I. National Criminai Justice Reference Service NCJrs
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.,'- :::: :::; :::::::::::: Jt:::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::; :::::::::::::;::::::::::::r: :::::::::::;:::: ';::::: ::; -:;;: :::::;c ;. ., .II.National Criminai Justice Reference ServiceInCJrsThis microfiche was produced from documents received forinclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercisecontrol over the physical condition of. the documents submitted"the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart onthis frame may be used to evaluate the document quality.-'#". C4 ,,-. ,-- "", r' *, """"X,,' "". -:--.",-,",' .'. · .--·J:" 'f'f .""';"'-' "".B1f:;1 ----,.5H' ;;1.01111.1111111.25 111111.4 '111111.6 'Su pplement to the1979 EditionMICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A- "" ''''''''''''' -'''-' ""'' -' .--.,,-. . -.-. .,.,/,. . . . ,";c:rc i,,.".", .,--,-'- 1;"1;. -,:", r-.,A".,Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply withthe standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504.Points of view or opinions stated in this document arethose of the author(s) and. do not represent the officialposition or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice.:1'.r",-"""l,(Institute: LJustice2 j . ,, . ,National,'United States Department of JusticeWashington, D. C. 205 .H Q, !IDATE FIl MEDIII'8; 3/8 1. I\'A Project of theNational College of District Attorneys,;I, ' ,.,1,
--------.---- ----------- ----l r:'O···{---,rrrBIBLIOGRAPHIC GUIDE FOR PROSECUTORSSUPPLEMENT TO THE 1979 EDITION.'C" . . :r, e7tot, JUstice69320This document h u e 01 Justiceperson or org . a been reprOduced.in this docum fatlon originating it. Po : iY ,as received from theerepr sent the offic't:, th e of the authors a or opinions statedJUstIce,Poslllon or policies of th0, not neceSsarilye NatIonal Institute ofPermission tocrotlchreproduce this co'R y has been granted b:ynghted material in mi.ert S. Fertit'Nat'l Colle'ta, Assoc Dea:: -:-::--": -:::::::':3g Ee 0 f D'.rto the National Criminal J ' st. Attny s 'FUr/herreprodIsion of the'NCJRSJUL 111980ACQUISITIONSUst,ce Referenc S ' e ervlce (NCJRSj,cop eof the NCJRS system requ/'res' 'perm/sPublished by theNATIONAL COLLEGE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEYS,College of LawUniversity of Houston4800 Calhoun BoulevardHouston, Texas 77004.-,-,·f-7I, \.
- ---------·. - .--.-··---------.-',.----.-' ----- - -----\-I- - - - - -frr} l' :' "iITABLE OF CONTENTS((FOREWORD . ························· .INTP.ODUCTION . .ixxiPublicationsAudioVisualSUBJECTS3Appellate Justice Administration . .*of Sentence . .3Arrest . '.: . .3***Arson . .357Attorney General . .******45757Casebooks and Texts . .**Case P repa ration . .*57Charging . , . '.' . " .*58Child Abuse . .558Child Support . .*Civil Contempt .*6***Civil- Legal Liability . .659Closing Argument . . .59Community Relations . .**Computers . .6*Confessions . .6Conspi racy . .7**AppellateRevif wBail . ; . .Bibliographies . .Capital Punishment . ···········1Career Criminal . .'Ij,- 1980 by National College of District Attorneys.Printed in the United States of America.All rights reserved. Civil Law . is project was supported in part by a grant awarded by the LawEnforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department ofJustice. The contents of articles and books listed in this publicationdo not necessarily represent the official position of the United StatesDepartment of Justice or the National College of District Attorneys.No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any formor by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying,recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, withoutpermission in w'riting from the National College of District Attorneys.iii"' .57Appeals . .*oJ:','
.-'-'- ::::. . . .,"""""H"''":.'''' -"-,, ,,,,,.,b I ''''''' -: : ':':: ''j:-,,,,,.t-:.-''''''''''' : '''''''' ,. ,, . . /PublicationsConstitutional Law . .7Con'sumer Fraud . .8Contempt . .*Corrections . .9Corruption . .9Counsel . .9AudioVisualCrime . .11601161Criminal Justice Administration . .1161Criminal LawProcedural . , . .12Criminal LawSubstantive . .****13Criminology . . .*Cross-Examination . .14Defenses . ,.1461Demonstrative Evidence . .**62Di rect Examination . .Discovery and Disclosure . .Discretion . .Disorders . .1415*Diversion . .15Domestic Violence . .15Eco.nomic Crime . .Electronic Surveillance . .*16Environmental Law . .1762176320*216421Pair Trial and Free Press . .*22Federal Criminal Procedu re . .23Grand Jury . .24Grantsmanship . " . .*******Expert Witnesses . .Extradition . .Guilty Pleas . .I*25Homicide .2564Immunity . .25Incompetency . .*2665Insanity . "2665Instructions . .27I nternational Law . .*27*276527*2865Jurisdiction . .28Jur'y . .*2866Juvenile Behavior . .3066Juvenile Justice . .3066Jeopardy\ . C'Judiciary . , . .iv"24Habeas Corpus . .Investigation*********Exclusionary Rule . .l·.AudioVisual17Evidence . .6162.Ethics ., . .*Criminal Justice . .Criminal Responsibility . ./****13Entrapment**11*Publications60Counsel - Appointed . .Criminal Court Administration . ,/'v
----- ---.-. '"- ----":"':::::' ;, ".- ., ,, ----.-.:.---------- '--'---:::::::::::':::::::: .-'-'-'-. --. ([I'I'II udio-I,Publications;Law EnforcementLaw Enforcement AssistanceAdministration . .;Visual*****Legal Education . .32Library Management . .'**Major Fraud**Mental Health32Narcotics and Drug Abuse .33**.*67Computers*67Personnel3367*6733*Open i ng Statement3368Organized Crime3469**34*Plea Negotiations/Da rgaining . .3471Police3671Policy and Prc\cedural Manuals .Omnibus Hearing. . .'ParalegalsParole ' t,,""". . C' Police - Prosecutor Relations . .Pornography. "' . .Post'-Conviction Remedies.".10 Preliminary HearingPress Relations.*36*--.lPublications{Pretrial Release . .Office ManagementBudget and Finance'''''-AudioVisual**Prisoners' Rights . / . .37*Privacy . .**Probation . .38*Prosecution . .38*Prosecutor3873Prostitution . .39*Psychology . .39*Public Corruption . .*73Public Defenders . .**Rehabilitation . .39*Scientific Evidence : . .3974Screening . .*74Search and Seizu re . .4074Sentencing42*Sexual Assault . .4475Speedy Trial . .44*Standards ., . .**Technological Advancements . .45*Terrorism . .45***Trial4676Victims46*White Collar Crime . .46*Witnesses . .46****72Pretrial Detention . " . .**Pretrial Hearings*73(i it}iTraining . .72i1t,72*lJ;.!11qIiIi1111b!I Ii'1 }l,!JDISTRI BUTORS . .*Indicates no entries in this issue under this subject.vii"4878i,11jtilH\i{, It , - ". '.-! I,;i
--rINTRODUCTIONFOREWORDThe purpose of this. Supplement to the 1979 Bibliographic Guide for Prosecutors is to increase the researchaids available to the practicing prosecutor. The subjectsreflect the broad range of needs and responsibilities of theaverage district attorney.We are ph ased to provide a complimentary copy of thisSupplement to the 1979 Bibliographic Guide for Prosecutors.On behalf of the Board of Regents, the National College ofDistrict Attorneys expresses its appreciation to HoustonEndowment, Incorporated, which helped make possible thepublication of this Bibliography. It is an example of theservices provided by the College to prosecutors throughoutthe nation.,To facilitate easy reference, the bibliography isdivided into two sections:publications and audio-visualmaterials.The College hopes it is filling a void in the criminaljustice field by providing essential reference sources forcurrent prosecution materials.The PUBLICATIONS SECTION lists books, manuals, andperiodical articles of interest to the average districtattorney. A listing of the publishers cited in the supplement can be found on page 48; periodical abbreviations usedcan be found on pages 49-53.Special recognition is extended to those NCDA staffmember's without whose hours of often tedious proofing,reading, and attending to countless details, this publicationwould not exist.The College especially thanks editorMichael E. McGown, research associates Joan Ward and KenWard, and typist Leah Alexander for their dedication to thisproject.The AUDIO-VISUAL SECTION lists selected materials bysubject, available for rental or purchase.A listing ofdistributors for audio-visual materials can be found on page78.Additional issues of the bibliography will be publishedperiodically to keep it cu rrent.JOHN JAY DOUGLASSDeani. )i .,I' ;,.ix,,!fxi1 ;l:t1. !i.,,.",
v.".- ,,, ----,-.APPEALSGovernment Appeal from Defendant's Successful Motion to Dismiss NotBarred by the Double Jeopardy Clause--United States v. Scott.(437 U.S. 82 (1978)), 28 De Paul L. Rev. 485 (1979).Harmful Use of Harmless Error in Criminal Cases, 64 Cornell L. Rev.538 (H).79).APP:ELLATE JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIONNONE ENTEREDIiAPPELLATE REVI EW OF SENTENCEAppellate ,R.eview of Sentences:A New Standard in Louisiana.(State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762 (La. 1979)), 39 La. L.Rev. 1172 (1979).I)Palmer, The Role of Appel/ate Courts in Mandatory SentencingSchemes . 26 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 753 (1979).PUBLICATIONS SECTIONI!,ARRESTAbsent Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Felony Arrest Effected inSuspect's Home Violates Fourth Amendment Guarantees. UnitedStates v. Reed, 53 St. John's L. Rev. 296 (1979).Fol k, The Case for Constitutional Constraints Upon the Power toMake Full Custody Arrests, 48 U. Cin. L. Rev. 321 (1979).Goldstein, An American Gulag?Summary Arrest and EmergencyDetention of Political Dissidents in the United States, 10Colum. Human Rights L. Rev. 541 (1978-79).United States v. Gaultney: The Fifth Circuit Redefines "HotPursuit." (581 F.2d 1137 (5th Cir. 1978)), 24 Loy. L. Rev.406 (1979).ARSONArson Fraud:Criminal Prosecution and Insurance Law, 7 FordhamUrb. L. J. 541 (1978-79).Carroll, Physical and Technical Aspects of Fire and ArsonInvestigation. 470 p. 29,50. Chas. C. Thomas (1979).FAIR Plans:History, Holtzman and the Arson-for-Profit Hazard, 7Fordham Urb. L. J. 617 (1978-79).3"
· -Palmer, Two Perspectives on Structuring Discretion:JusticesStewart and White on the Death Penalty, 70 J. Crim. L. &Criminology 194 (1979).The Arson Investigation--Its Dual Nature andFourth Amendment Se.arch Requirements. (436 U.S. 499 (1978)),1979 Det. C. L. Rev. 329.Michigan v. Tyler:ATTORNEY GENERALJNONE ENTEREDCAREER CRIMINALNONE ENTEREDBAILNONE ENTEREDCASEBOOKS AND TEXTSNONE ENTEREDBI BLiOGRAPHIESNONE ENTERED.CAPITAL PUNISHMENT \,Adelstein, Informational Paradox and the Pricing of Crime: CapitalSentencing Standards in Economic Perspective, 70 J. Crim. L. &Criminology 281 (1979).\NONE ENTERED - '"::to:"CHILD ABUSEChild Abuse and Neglect--A Compendium of Course Materials. 8.75. National College of District Attorneys (1977).Criminal Law--Death Penalty--Right of a Defendant to Have AnyRelevant Aspect of His Character and Circumstances of OffenseUsed as Factors Mitigating a Death Sentence. (Locket v. Ohio,'138 U.S. 586 (1978)), 25 Wayne L. Rev. 1147 (1979).Dembitz, Preventing Youth Crime by Preventing Child Neglect.& Mihaila, Incest and the Legal System:Alternatives, 12 U.C.D. L. Rev. 673 (1979).KirkwoodLegal Profession Toward Capital Punishment--A Survey andAnalysis, 30 Mercer L. Rev. 585 (1979).65Inadequacies andKroth, Child Sexual Abuse: Analysis of a Family Therapy Approach.200 p. Chas. C. Thomas (1979).Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Temporal Cross-SectionalApproach, 70 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 235 (1979).Rosenthal, Physical Abuse of Children by Parents: The Criminalization Decision, 7 Am. J. Crim. L. 141 (1979).Evolutions of the Eighth Amendment and Standards for the Impositionof the Death Penalty, 28 DePaul L. Rev. 351 (1979).Sklar, The Criminal Law and the Incest Offender: A Case forDecriminalization?, 7 Bull. Am. Acad. Psych. & L. 69.Hancock, The Perils of Calibrating the Death Penalty ThroughSpecial Definitions of Murder, 53 Tul. L. Rev. 828 (1979).CHILD SUPPORTMisner, Resentencing to Death Under State v. Watson: A Denial ofthe Right to a Speedy Trial, 1979 Ariz. St. L. J. 137.NONE ENTERED54,,.387 p.A. B .A.J. 920 (1979).Davidow & Lowe, Attitudes of Potential and Present Members of thefCASE PREPARATIONNONE ENTEREDBailey, The Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty for Murder inCalifornia, 52 S. Cal. L. Rev. 743 (1979).:r,CHARGINGBailey, Some Further Evidence on Imprisonment vs. the Death Penaltyas a Deterrent to Murder, 2 Law & Human Behavior 245.'\Silverman, The Burden of Proof and Procedural Fairness in CapitalCases, 3 Am. J. Trial Advocacy 75 (1979).""'! -);",, -- - - ,.,.;. :.:.: :.".:-::j.,(IIr"! I
;-.CIVI L CONTEMPTElliott & Wakefield, Exculpatory Statements by Accused Persons,1979 Crim. L. Rev. 428.NONE ENTEREDA Need to Reconsider theConstitutional Premises Underlying the Law of Confessions, 17Grano, Rhode Island v. Innis:CIVIL LAWAm. Crim. L. Rev. 1 (1979).Russell i New Damage Remedies for Violations of ConstitutionalRights, 31 Baylor L. Rev. 67 (1979).Miranda and Misdemeanors, 14 Land & Water L. Rev. 521 (1979).Police Use of Trickery as an Interrogation Technique, 32 Vand. L.CIVIL-LEGAL LIABILITYRev. 1167 (1979).Constitutional Law--Civil Rights--Covernmental Immunity--Scope ofImmunity Available to Federal Executive Officials. [Butz v.Economou, Lf38 U.S. Lf78 (1978)),1979 Wis. L. Rev. 604.Sunderland, Self-Incrimination and Constitutional Principle:Miranda v. Arizona and Beyond, 15 Wake Forest L. Rev. 171(1979) .Constitutional Law--Federal Executive Officials Sued for AllegedViolations of Constitutional Rights Entitled Only to aQualified Immunity. [Butz v. Economou, 98 S. Ct. 298LfTestimonial Waiver of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, 94Harv. L. Rev. 1752 (1979).(1978)). 53 Tul. L. Rev. 955 (1979).The Uncounselled Confession:Soc. Prob. 343 (1979).CLOSING ARGUMENTA New York Variant, 14 Colum. J. L.Zonana, Hypnosis, Sodium Amy tal, and Confessions, 7 Bull. Am. Acad.Psych. & L. 18.NONE ENTEREDCONSPIRACYCOMMUNITY RELATIONSMcLean, Conspiracy:Crim. L.Q. 286.NONE ENTEREDAdmissible Evidence and Method of Proof, 21Tarlow, Defense of a Federal Conspiracy Prosecution, 4 Nat'l J.Crim. Def. 183 (1978).COMPUTERSBaker, A Computerized Screening System for Correctional Classification, 6 Crim. 'Just. & Behavior 251 (1979).CONSTITUTIONAL LAWMcLaughlin, Computer Crime: The Ribicoff Amendment to UnitedStates Code, Title 18, 2 Crim. Just. J. 217 (1979).Beaird, In Their Own Image:The Reframing of the Due ProcessClause by the United States Supreme Court, 13 Ga. L. Rev. 479(1979).Sherman & Kinnard, The Development, Discovery, and Use of ComputerSupport Systems in Achieving Efficiency in Litigation, 79Constitutional Law and Criminal Procedure--Interrogation inViolation of Miranda--State v. Innis, 391 A.2d 1158 [R.I.1978), cert. granted, 99 S. Ct. 1277 (1979) [No. 78-1076), 13Co/urn. L. Rev. 267 (1979).Suffolk U.L. Rev. 591 (1979).CONFESSIONSConstitutional Law Deskbook.543 p. 12.00.District Attorneys C3rd ed.1978).Constitut[onal Law and Criminal Procedure--lnterrogation inViolation of Miranda. [State v. Innis, 391 A.2d 1158 [R.I.1978) cert. granted, 99 S. Ct. 1277 (1979) No. 78-1076), 13Constitutional Law in Texas--A Deskbook for Prosecuting Attorneys.Suffolk U.L. Rev. 591 (1979).51 p. 3.50.National College of District Attorneys (1977).67)1(National College of---- n:;;:::o""" ::: :. . . : '""'-!.;.d. .:l.(O
Constitutional Law--Massachusetts Statute Imposing A DifferentPenalty for Jury Convictions Upheld as Not Violative of DueProcess or Equal Protection. (Commonwealth v. LeRoy, 1978Mass. Adv. Sh. 2376, 380 N.E. 2d 128), 1 W. New Eng. L. Rev.CONTEMPTCooper, The Sixth Amendment and Military Criminal Law: Constitutional Protections and Beyond, 84 Mil. L. Rev. 41 (1979).CORRECTIONSNONE ENTERED831 (1979).:I Alpert, Patterns of Change in Prisonization: A LongitudinalAnalysis, 6 Crim. Just. & Behavior. 159 (1979).Criminal Law--Equal Protection Requires that Defendants Indicted bya Grand Jury be Granted a Post-Indictment Preliminary Hearing.(Hawkins v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.3d 58lf., 586 P.2d 916, 150Cal. Rptr. If.35 (1978)),19 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1119 (197fJ).Analysis of Alternatives to Incarceration for Non-ViolentOffenders: A Progressive Approach to Correctional Procedure,11 St. Mary's L.J. 187 (1979).Galie, State Constitutional Guarantees and Protection ofDefendants' Rights: The Case of New York, 1969-1978, 28Buffalo L. Rev. 157 (1979).Criminal Law: Punishment. (In re Akridge, 90 Wash. 2d 350, 581P .2d 1050 (1978)), 14 Gonz. L. Rev. 703 (1979).Jaffee, The Constitution and Proof by Dead or UnconfrontableDec/arants, 33 Ark. L. Rev. 227 (1979).Escape from Cruel and Unusual Punishment: A Theory of Constitutional Necessity. 59 B.U.L. Rev. 334 (1979).Lupu, Untangling the Strands of the Fourteenth Amendment, 77 Mich.L. Rev. 981 (1979).Mabli, Age and Prison Violence:Increasing Age Heterogeneity as dViolence-Reducing Strategy in Prisons, 6 Crim. Just. f:,Behavior. 175 (1979).A New Constitutional Approach to the Doctrine of TribalSovereignty, 6 Am. Indian L. Rev. 371 (1978).P.oulou, Dynamics of Criminal Corrections.(1979).People v. Pettingill: The Independent State Ground Debate inCalifornia. (21 ·Cal. 3d 23lf., 578 P.2d 109, 1lf.5 Cal. Rptr.862),67 Calif. L. Rev. 768 (1979).Foundation PressCORRUPTIONShaman, The First Amendment Rule Against Overbreadth, 52 Temp. L. Q.259 (1979).Loomis, Federal Prosecution of Elected State Officials for MailFraud:Creative Prosecution or an Affront to Federalism?Am. U. L. Rev. 63 (1978).Tate, C
This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of. the documents submitted" the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. - "", _ r' *, """"X -'#"._ C4_,,-. _ ,- .
Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם
Mr.Justice Sh.Riaz Ahmed, HCJ Mr.Justice Munir A.Sheikh Mr.Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Mr.Justice Qazi Muhammad Farooq Mr.Justice Mian Muhammad Ajmal Mr.Justice Syed Deedar Hussain Shah Mr.Justice Hamid Ali Mirza Mr.Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar Mr.Justice Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.15 OF 2002
Criminal Justice Information Project Catherine Plummer, SEARCH Pamela Scanlon, Automated Regional Justice Information System Laurie Smith, Kalamazoo Criminal Justice Council Integrated Justice Information System Institute (Integrated Justice Information Systems): Susan Bates, Justice Management Inc. Steve Mednick, Law Offices of Steven G.
Justice David S. Wiggins Justice Daryl L. Hecht Justice Brent R. Appel Justice Thomas D. Waterman Justice Edward M. Mansfield Justice Bruce B. Zager In Memoriam Chief Justice W. Ward Reynoldson (Iowa Supreme Court 1971-1987) Justice James H. Carter (Iowa Supreme Court 1982-2006)
Community School students: (l-r) Justice William J. Crain, Justice Piper D. Griffin, Chief Justice John L. Weimer, Justice Jay B. McCallum, and Justice James T. Genovese. (l-r) Louisiana Supreme Court Justice William J. Crain, Chief Justice John L. Weimer(seated), and Law Library of . Louisiana Director Miriam Childs.
and Victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preven tion is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance,
E O F JUST I C E P R O G R A M B S J N I J OJJ D P B J S O V C U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 1999 National Report Series Juvenile Justice Bulletin Shay Bilchik, Administrator DECEMBER 1999 Juvenile Justice: A Century of Change As the Nation moves into the 21st century .
An Introduction to Thermal Field Theory Yuhao Yang September 23, 2011 Supervised by Dr. Tim Evans Submitted in partial ful lment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Department of Physics Imperial College London. Abstract This thesis aims to give an introductory review of thermal eld theo- ries. We review the imaginary time formalism .
