THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

2y ago
38 Views
2 Downloads
345.63 KB
18 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Sutton Moon
Transcription

THE GRIEVANCE PROCESSELLEN EIDELBACH PITLUKEthics AttorneyState Bar of TexasP.O. Box 12487Austin, Texas 78711-2487Ethics Helpline(800) 532-3947State Bar of Texas5TH ANNUAL JOHN HUFFAKER AGRICULTURAL LAW COURSEMay 19-20, 2011LubbockCHAPTER 13

ELLEN EIDELBACH PITLUKEthics AttorneyState Bar of TexasP.O. Box 12487Austin, Texas 78711-2487Ethics Helpline(800) 532-3947Ellen Eidelbach Pitluk is an ethics attorney with the State Bar of Texas in the Office of Chief DisciplinaryCounsel. She advises attorneys on the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, Texas Rules ofDisciplinary Procedure and ethics opinions issued by the Professional Ethics Committee for the State Barof Texas. She has also served as an administrative attorney and classification attorney for the Office ofChief Disciplinary Counsel. Ms. Pitluk speaks frequently at continuing legal education events forTexasBar CLE and city and county bar associations. Her article, Is the Confidence Man Your Client? ConArtists Target Lawyers on the Internet, was published in 74 Tex. B.J. 80, 81 (2011).Ms. Pitluk received her law degree from St. Mary’s University School of Law in December 2002. Shebecame licensed in Texas in May 2003 and in the United States Western District of Texas in December2003. Prior to joining the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Ms. Pitluk represented clients in privatepractice and volunteered as a mediator for the Bexar County Dispute Resolution Center and Hill CountryDispute Resolution Center for several years. She is a former member of the San Antonio Bar Associationand San Antonio Bar Foundation. Ms. Pitluk is a member of the State Bar of Texas, Travis County WomenLawyers Association, College of the State Bar of Texas and American Bar Association. She enjoysvolunteering for community-related service organizations in Austin.

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13TABLE OF CONTENTSI.TO GRIEVE OR NOT TO GRIEVE, THAT IS THE QUESTION . 1A. No Standing or Privity Requirement . 1B. Lawyer’s Mandatory Duty to Report Misconduct or Fitness of Another Lawyer or Judge . 1II.ONE SIDE OF THE STORY – THE CLASSIFICATION PROCESS . 2A. Classification . 2B. Dismissal as an Inquiry . 2C. Upgrade to a Complaint . 2III. DEVELOPING THE STORY – THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS . 3A. Confidentiality . 3B. Investigation . 3C. Summary Disposition Panel – A Second Chance for Dismissal . 3D. Just Cause . 3IV. TELLING THE STORY – ADJUDICATION . 4A. Procedural Rules. 4B. Evidentiary Panel and a Proper Quorum . 4C. Timeframes and Venue . 4D. Published Case Law . 5E. Appeal of an Evidentiary Judgment . 5V. ENDINGS ARE THE HARDEST PART – SANCTIONS . 5A. Sanctions . 5B. Grievance Referral Program . 7C. Reinstatement . 7VI. ANOTHER GENRE – COMPULSORY DISCIPLINE . 7A. Intentional Crime . 7B. Pleas That Trigger Compulsory Discipline . 7VII. APPENDICES . 8APPENDIX A: RESOURCES . 9APPENDIX B: FLOWCHART FOR PROCESSING A GRIEVANCE . 11APPENDIX C: REGIONAL OFFICES FOR THE OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL . 12i

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13& (b). Comment 4 emphasizes that the rule “ limitsthe reporting obligation to those offenses that a selfregulating profession must vigorously endeavor toprevent. Similar considerations apply to the reportingof judicial misconduct. A measure of judgment is,therefore required in complying with the provisions ofthis Rule.” 8Consequently, under the mandatory duty to reportanother lawyer or judge, the reporting lawyer needs tohave: (1) actual knowledge of the prohibited behavior,which (2) raises a substantial question of either (a) thelawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as alawyer; or (2) the judge’s fitness for office.9The term “substantial” refers to the seriousness ofthe alleged misconduct and “not the quantum ofevidence of which the lawyer is aware”.10 Forexample, a lawyer who misuses his or her client’s trustaccount funds would meet the definition of substantial,because of the resulting financial harm to the clientand/or a third person, and the profession.11The term “fitness” is defined in the terminologypreceding the TDRPC. ‘“Fitness” denotes thosequalities of physical, mental and psychological healththat enable a person to discharge a lawyer’sresponsibilities to clients in conformity with the[TDRPC]. Normally a lack of fitness is indicated mostclearly by a persistent inability to discharge, orunreliability in carrying out, significant obligations.’12Rule 8.03(c) allows a lawyer to satisfy themandatory duty to report a fitness issue, resulting fromsubstance abuse or mental illness, by anonymouslyreporting the lawyer or judge to a peer assistanceprogram, such as the Texas Lawyers AssistanceProgram (TLAP).13 The name of the person whoreports another lawyer or judge is kept confidential.14THE GRIEVANCE PROCESSI.TO GRIEVE OR NOT TO GRIEVE, THAT ISTHE QUESTIONA. No Standing or Privity RequirementA grievance is defined as “a written statement,from whatever source, apparently intended to allegeProfessional Misconduct by a lawyer, or lawyerDisability, or both, received by the Office of the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel.”1 Consequently, any person orentity may file a grievance against a lawyer, who islicensed in Texas, regardless of standing or privity.The State Bar of Texas’ Office of Chief DisciplinaryCounsel (CDC) receives approximately 7,000grievances each year.2 Because anyone can file agrievance and allege anything, whether or not theallegation involves a violation of the TexasDisciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (TDRPC),roughly two-thirds of the grievances are dismissed;although, these figures vary annually.3 A grievancewhich is dismissed is referred to as an inquiry.4 Agrievance that is upgraded for investigation is called acomplaint.5B.Lawyer’s Mandatory Duty to ReportMisconduct or Fitness of Another Lawyer orJudgeRule 8.03 of the TDRPC addresses a lawyer’sduty to report misconduct or fitness of another lawyeror judge. As Comment 1 to the rule notes: “Selfregulation of the legal profession requires thatmembers of the profession take effective measures toprotect the public when they have knowledge notprotected as a confidence6 that a violation of theserules has occurred. Lawyers have a similar obligationwith respect to judicial misconduct.” 7However, not every violation by another lawyer orjudge falls under the reporting requirements of 8.03(a)1Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 1.06 (R).Id. 8.03(a)-(b).Id. 8.03 cmt. 4 (emphasis added).11Source: State Bar of Texas Attorney Grievance SystemStatistics (2010). An average of 7,031 grievances werereceived over the past seven years, beginning with the StateBar of Texas fiscal year, June 1, 2003-May 31, 2004 to June1, 2009- May 31, 2010.See generally Neely v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline,302 S.W.3d 331 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet.denied); Onwuteaka v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 2009WL 620253 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.], pet. denied);McIntyre v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 247 S.W.3d 434(Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, pet. denied); Brown v. Comm’n forLawyer Discipline, 980 S.W.2d 675 (Tex.App.-San Antonio1998, no pet.); and Fry v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline,979 S.W.2d 331 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet.denied).3Id. An average of 4,927 grievances were dismissed in thetime period described in FN2, based on a total average of7,031 less an average of 2,104 grievances classified ascomplaints. (7,031-2,104 4,927 inquiries.)5Id. 8.03 cmt. 4 (emphasis added).910248Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 1.06(S).12Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof’l Conduct Terminology.Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 1.06(G).13Id. 8.03(c) & Cmt. 5.6See Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof’l Conduct 8.03(d); 1.05(c)(2)[client may consent to reveal confidences].714Tex. Health & Safety Code §467.005 (Vernon 1989 &Supp. 1997), §467.007(a) (Vernon 1989 & Supp. 1991). Seegenerally http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Id. 8.03 cmt. 1 (emphasis added).1

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13(See Appendix A for a list of organizations whichhandle reporting requirements.)have to disclose the dismissed grievance.21Complainants, on the other hand, may disclose it.22II.C. Upgrade to a ComplaintIf BODA reverses the CDC’s dismissal, thegrievance becomes a complaint.23 A complaint is anygrievance that is upgraded for investigation during theclassification process or any inquiry that is reversed onappeal.24 Both the complainant and respondent arenotified that the grievance has been classified as acomplaint.25 The respondent receives a copy of thecomplaint with a demand to respond in writing to theCDC within 30 days of receipt of the notice.26The importance of a respondent preparing a wellwritten response (essentially a rebuttal) withsupporting evidence cannot be understated. In fact,the failure to provide any kind of written response tothe CDC violates TDRPC 8.04(a)(8).27 Lawyers havebeen disciplined for a failure to respond even when theunderlying disciplinary case may have been proper fordismissal by a summary disposition panel. The lessonhere is for the lawyer not to be too proud, too busy, ortoo lazy to respond; even if the complainant was theworst client in the universe. A respondent should neverignore a demand by the CDC for a written response toa complaint.The CDC has to conclude its investigation in 60days or less from the deadline for the respondent’swritten response.28 In addition, the complainantbecomes a fact witness, because the party prosecutingthe complaint is the Commission for Lawyer Discipline(Commission).29 The Commission is the CDC’s clientand gives the CDC the authority to pursue appeals andagree to settlements.30ONE SIDE OF THE STORY – THECLASSIFICATION PROCESSA. ClassificationThe story begins with a written grievance. Thegrievance is only one side of the story about anindividual lawyer, but it is the crux of how long thestory continues. The screening of a grievance todetermine whether or not it alleges a violation of thedisciplinary rules is called, classification. Lawyers atthe CDC in Austin classify all of the grievances for thestate within 30 days of receipt.15B.Dismissal as an InquiryA grievance classified as an inquiry may beappealed by the complainant to the Board ofDisciplinary Appeals (BODA) within 30 days fromreceipt of notice of the CDC’s determination.16 Therespondent lawyer will also receive a notice from theCDC, explaining that a grievance was filed and wasclassified as an inquiry, and the complainant has a rightto appeal. Respondent is also provided a copy of thedismissed grievance. If the complainant appeals andBODA affirms the inquiry, the decision is final.17 TheCDC refers inquiries to the State Bar of Texas’ ClientAttorney Assistance Program (CAAP) for voluntarydispute resolution. 18In the 2009-10 bar year, BODA affirmed 89percent of the appeals of CDC classification decisionsit received as inquiries.19 Subsequent grievances by thesame complainant alleging the same misconduct areclassified as res judicata.Inquiries are treated as confidential by the CDC,which cannot disclose them to persons requesting suchinformation.However, the CDC may discloseinquiries to authorized agencies or committees and lawenforcement as described in Rule 6.08 of the TexasRules of Disciplinary Procedure (TRDP).20 Thelawyer, who was the subject of an inquiry, does not21Tex. Gov’t Code §81.072(o) (Vernon 1987 & Supp. 1991,2001, 2003); and Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.16 (amended2009). But see Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof’l Conduct8.04(a)(3).Template.cfm?Section Texas Lawyers Assistance22Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.16.Program.23Id. 2.10.24Id.Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.10.25Id.Id.1516Id.2617Id.2718Id.192009-2010 ST. B. OF TEX. COMMISSIONDISCIPLINE ANN. REP. 16.20Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof’l Conduct 8.04(a)(8). See also8.04(a)(1).FOR28Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.12.29Id.30Id. 4.06(A); Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof’l Conduct 1.02(a).LAWYERTex. R. Disciplinary P. 6.08 (amended 2009).2

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13complaint as an inquiry.41 A complaint dismissed bythe SDP is final and cannot be appealed by thecomplainant.42 During the 2009-10 bar year, 97percent of the cases presented for summary dispositionwere dismissed.43 However, the SDP may vote toproceed to just cause based on its own analysis of theevidence.44III. DEVELOPING THE STORY – THEINVESTIGATION PROCESSA. ConfidentialityThe treatment of a complaint is confidentialduring the classification and investigation phases.31Confidentiality continues if just cause is found and thedisciplinary case is adjudicated by an evidentiarypanel. Even though the evidentiary hearing process isconfidential, records to the proceeding become publiclyaccessible once a respondent receives a publicsanction.32Public sanctions include a publicreprimand, suspension, disbarment and resignation inlieu of discipline.33 If a respondent receives a privatereprimand, the records will remain confidential.34 Ofcourse, if a respondent chooses to have his or her caseheard in district court by a visiting judge, it is notconfidential.35D. Just CauseThe TRDP define just cause to mean:“ such cause as is found to exist upon areasonable inquiry that would induce areasonably intelligent and prudent person tobelieve that an attorney either has committedan act or acts of Professional Misconductrequiring that a Sanction be imposed, orsuffers from a Disability that requires eithersuspension as an attorney licensed to practicelaw in the State of Texas or probation.” 45B.InvestigationA CDC investigator and administrative attorney,who are assigned to a particular complaint, begin theinformation-gathering process. The ,complainant(s) and respondent; reviewing therespondent’s written response; researching court files;and obtaining other information. At the conclusion ofthe investigation, a finding must be made of whetherjust cause exists to prosecute respondent forprofessional misconduct.36When a determination of just cause is made, therespondent is notified in writing of: (1) the just causefinding, (2) the alleged rule violations, (3) the allegedacts or omissions leading to those violations, and (4)given a choice (or election) between the complaintproceeding to an evidentiary hearing or district court.46Respondent’s election must be in writing and servedupon the CDC no later than 20 days from the date therespondent received the just cause notification.47 Ifrespondent does not make an election, the complaintproceeds to an evidentiary hearing.48In the 2009-10 bar year, there were 453 just causefindings and less than 10 percent of respondentselected district court.49 Respondents typically choosean evidentiary hearing, because it offers the possibilityof receiving the lowest sanction, called a privatereprimand, which is not available in district courtproceedings.50 Respondents, who do not make anC. Summary Disposition Panel – A SecondChance for DismissalIf there is no finding of just cause, the CDC mustrequest a summary disposition panel (SDP) to reviewthe complaint.37 Venue for a summary disposition is inthe county where the alleged misconduct occurred, if itoccurred in Texas.38 Otherwise, venue is in the countywhere the respondent resides or, in the alternative, inTravis County.39 The SDP meets without the presenceof complainant, respondent or witnesses.40 If the SDPagrees with the CDC’s finding, it will dismiss the3132Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.16.Id. 2.16(A)(2).36373842Id.2009-2010 ST. B. OF TEX. COMMISSIONDISCIPLINE ANN. REP. 18.Id. 1.06(Y); and 2009-2010 ST. B. OF TEX. COMMISSIONFOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE ANN. REP. 20-22.35Id.4333344144Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.13.Id. 2.16(E); and 20.45Id. 1.06(U).Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 3.02.46Id. 2.14(D); 2.15.Id. 1.06(U); 2.12.47Id. 2.15.Id. 2.13.48Id.Id. 2.11(A).4939Id.40Id. 2.13.2009-2010 ST. B. OF TEX. COMMISSIONDISCIPLINE ANN. REP. 19.503Id.; Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.16 & 3.10.FORLAWYERFORLAWYER

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13election, default to an evidentiary hearing.51Additionally, a trial in district court is public while anevidentiary hearing is confidential.52A respondent who elects district court may, ofcourse, choose a jury or bench trial.53 In either case, theTexas Supreme Court appoints an active district judgewho does not reside in the respondent’s administrativejudicial district to preside over the case.54dedicated lawyers and nonlawyers donated their timeto serve as grievance committee members.59 Inaddition, there are six lawyers and six public memberswho serve as volunteers on the Commission forLawyer Discipline.60 Even the appellate body, BODA,which has original and appellate jurisdiction over sixtypes of disciplinary cases, is made up of twelvelawyers who volunteer their time.61A properly constituted quorum is the subject ofTRDP and case law.62 Generally, for every group oftwo lawyer members, there must be one public memberon the evidentiary panel.63 For example, if there arethree lawyers present (which equal one grouping oftwo), there has to be one public member.64 But if thereare four lawyers present (which equals two groupings),there must be two public members present for thehearing to proceed.65The panel presiding over an evidentiary hearingmust also have a majority of the members appointed tothe panel be present in order to have a quorum.66Additionally, the quorum has to remain properlyconstituted during the entire evidentiary hearing.67 Asa result, a properly constituted quorum will (1)represent a majority of members appointed to theevidentiary panel (2) with the proper ratio of lawyermembers to public members (3) during the entireproceeding.68IV. TELLING THE STORY – ADJUDICATIONA. Procedural RulesSince approximately 90 percent of complaints areheard by an evidentiary panel of grievance committeemembers, this paper will focus primarily onevidentiary hearings. Trial in district court proceeds asany other civil case and the right to appeal is throughthe state appellate court system.Regardless of the adjudicatory setting, there aretwo sets of procedural rules that a lawyer, who isrepresenting respondents or is a respondent, should beknowledgeable of: (1) the Texas Rules of DisciplinaryProcedure (TRDP) and (2) the Texas Rules of CivilProcedure except as varied by the TRDP.55B.Evidentiary Panel and a Proper QuorumFor an evidentiary panel to convene, it must havea properly constituted quorum of grievance committeemembers.56 An evidentiary panel is typically made upof six grievance committee members, four of whom areTexas-licensed lawyers and two of whom are publicmembers or nonlawyers.57 All grievance committeemembers are volunteers.58 In some respects, thereliance of the disciplinary system on volunteers isastounding. In 2009-10 bar year, a total of 399C. Timeframes and VenueFifteen days after the CDC receives therespondent’s election (or the day following theexpiration of the respondent’s right to elect), thegrievance committee chair must appoint committeemembers to an evidentiary panel.69 Evidentiary panels5951Id. 2.15.2009-2010 ST. B. OF TEX. COMMISSIONDISCIPLINE ANN. REP. 13.52Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.16.6053Id. 3.01.6154Id. 3.02.55Id. 1.02 ; 3.08(B) (emphasis added).Id. 2.07; Allison v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, BODACase No. 08-0705 (August 21, 2008) (interpreted a properlyconstituted quorum under TRDP 2.07 to mean, if there areonly four members from the six-member evidentiary panelpresent during an evidentiary hearing, at least one of themmust be a public member [e.g., 3 attorney members 1public member; or 2 attorneys 2 public members]; Cafierov. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, BODA Case No. 37811(May 10, 2007) [one public member left during theevidentiary hearing and there was no longer a properlyconstituted quorum]. BODA opinions are available at:http://txboda.org/.58LAWYERId. at 1-3; and Tex. R. Disciplinary Procedure 4.08.2010 BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY ANN. REP. 1 & 5; but seeTRDP 7.06. The six types of disciplinary cases are: (1)appeal of a CDC inquiry, (2) appeal of an evidentiary paneljudgment, (3) reciprocal discipline [original jurisdiction], (4)compulsory discipline [original jurisdiction], (5) revocationof disciplinary probation [original jurisdiction], and (6)lawyer disability discipline [original jurisdiction].5657FOR62See generally Allison; and Cafiero.63Allison at 4-6.64Id.65Id.6667Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.07.Cafiero at 11-12, 14.Cafiero at 10-11.68Supra note 62.Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.08.69Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.17.4

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13usually are in six-member or three-member panels,depending on the size of the committee.70 Venue is inthe county where respondent’s principal place ofpractice is maintained; or in the alternative, the countywhere respondent resides.71 Other venue choices mayinclude the county where the professional misconductallegedly occurred if respondent does not maintain aplace of practice or residence; or, in some cases, TravisCounty.72The CDC has 60 days from receipt of therespondent’s election (or the deadline for election if noelection is made) to file its evidentiary petition with theevidentiary panel.73 Respondent’s deadline to file ananswer is 5:00 p.m. on the first Monday following theexpiration of 20 days after receiving service of theCDC’s petition.74 If Respondent does not timely filean answer, then a default is entered and the evidentiarypanel conducts a hearing on sanctions. 75An evidentiary hearing must be held no later than180 days after the date the answer is filed, but nosooner than 45 days after each party receives notice ofthe hearing date (unless waived by all parties).76Either party may serve a request for disclosureupon the other within 30 days before the first setting ofthe evidentiary hearing.77 A party has to provide awritten response to the request within 30 days afterreceiving service. A failure to respond to the requestfor disclosure may prevent the party from introducingwitnesses or evidence that was not disclosed in theenumerated list provided in TRDP 2.17(D).78 Inaddition, the parties may not raise an objection orassertion of work product in order to avoid a requestfor disclosure.79TRDP 2.17(E) outlines a limited discovery planand states that the discovery period begins when theevidentiary petition is filed and continues until 30 daysbefore the day of the evidentiary hearing.80 Althoughthe evidentiary hearing is less formal than a districtcourt trial, it is similar in many ways to other civilcases.81The evidentiary panel must issue a judgmentwithin 30 days of the hearing.82 The judgment mustinclude findings of fact, conclusions of law and thesanction to be imposed.83 At the conclusion of theevidentiary hearing, the evidentiary panel may: (1) findthat professional misconduct occurred and imposesanctions; or (2) dismiss the case; or (3) find that therespondent suffers from a disability and forward thatfinding to BODA.84For a complete set of procedural deadlines, thelawyer should consult the TRDP. (See Appendix A foronline links to the TRDP.)7081Id. 2.17(F)-(N).82Id. 2.17(P).Id.83Id.Id.717273D. Published Case LawCase law regarding Texas disciplinary cases maybe found in the Southwest Reporter, Federal Reporter,and at the Board of Disciplinary Appeals’ web site athttp://www.boda.org/.E.Appeal of an Evidentiary JudgmentAll appeals from an evidentiary hearing go toBODA.85 The notice of appeal must be filed within 30days after the date of the evidentiary judgment. 86However, when a motion for a new trial or a motion tomodify the judgment is filed, the deadline to file thenotice increases to 90 days.87 Appeals are reviewedunder the substantial evidence standard.88 In addition,BODA promulgates its own procedural rules for theparties to follow.89 An appeal from BODA is to theTexas Supreme Court.90V. ENDINGS ARE THE HARDEST PARTSANCTIONSA. SanctionsBoth the evidentiary panel and the district courtjudge may, at their discretion, hold bifurcated hearingson sanctions when professional misconduct is found.91Id. 2.06-2.07; and Cafiero at 10-11.Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 2.11(B).Id. 2.17(A).8474Id. 2.17(B).85Id. 2.24.75Id. 2.17(C).86Id.Id.76Id. 2.17(O).8777Id. 2.17(D).88Id.78Id.89Id.Id.90Id. 2.28 & 7.11.Id. 2.17(E).91Id. 2.18 & 3.10.79805

The Grievance ProcessChapter 13active and the lawyer cannot practice law.100 If thelawyer violates a disciplinary rule while on a probatedsuspension or partially probated suspension, he or sheis subject to revocation.101 An order granting a motionto revoke turns the entire suspension into an activesuspension without any credit for time the respondenthas already served during the probated period,essentially restarting the suspension period.102Revocations of evidentiary judgments are heard byBODA.103 However, a motion to revoke probation of adistrict court judgment is filed with the district court,which has continuing jurisdiction until the suspensionends.104Other suspensions include an immediate interimsuspension when the CDC can show that irreparableharm will occur to clients or prospective clients ifrespondent is allowed to continue practicing law whilethe disciplinary case is being adjudicated.105 A petitionfor an interim suspension is filed in a district court ofproper venue.106Another type of suspension is an indefinitedisability suspension, which only BODA can grant.107The TRDP define disability as “ any physical, mentalor emotional condition that, with or without asubstantive rule violation, results in the attorney’sinability to practice law, provide client services,complete contracts of employment, or otherwise carryout his or her professional responsibilities to clients,courts, the profession, or the public.” 108BODA has the authority to hear motions forindefinite disability suspensions.109 It will appoint aDistrict Disability Committee (DDC) to receiveevidence and determine whether respondent has adisability.110 The DDC is comprised of one attorney,one medical doctor (or mental health care professionalwith a doctorate degree) and one public member.111Some of the factors that the trier of fact must considerwhen imposing sanctions (in no particular order) are: nature and degree of the professional misconductcommitted by respondent, for which he or she isbeing sanctionedseriousness of and circumstances surrounding theprofessional misconductloss or damage to the clientdamage to the professionassurance that those who use legal services in thefuture will be insulated from the type ofprofessional misconduct foundprofits to the attorneyavoidance of repetitiondeterrent effect on othersmaintenance of respect for the legal Professionconduct of respondent during the Proceedingrespondent’s disciplinary record, including anyprivate reprimands 92Sanctions may range from a private reprimand todisbarment.93 A respondent who faces a sanction asserious as disbarment may choose to resign in lieu ofdiscipline.94 In

Counsel. She advises attorneys on the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure and ethics opinions issued by the Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas. She has also served as an administrative attorney and classification attorney for the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel. Ms.

Related Documents:

1 Management Human Resource Management Grievance Handling Items Description of Module Subject Name Management Paper Name Human Resource Management Module Title Grievance Handling Module Id Module No.29 Pre- Requisites Knowledge of Industrial relations Objectives To have a knowledge of Grievance handling Keywords Grievance, Grievance Handling, Grievance committee, Grievance redressal machinery.

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

ARTICLE 16 - MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS 16.1 Health Insurance. 16.2 Health Tests. 16.3 Life Insurance. 16.5 Other Insurance. 16.6 Retirement Plan. ARTICLE 17 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 17.1 Grievance Defined. 17.2 Filing a Grievance. 17.3 Time Limits. 17.4 Grievance Procedure. 17.5 Union Grievance. 17.6 Termination.

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được