The Value Of Libraries For Research And Researchers

3y ago
34 Views
2 Downloads
7.15 MB
68 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jayda Dunning
Transcription

The value of libraries for research and researchersThe value of libraries forresearch and researchersA RIN and RLUK reportMarch 20111

AcknowlegementsThis report was commissioned by Research Libraries UK (RLUK) and the Research Information Network (RIN). Thefieldwork and data analysis were undertaken by Curtis Cartwright Consulting Limited, in partnership with the HigherEducation Statistics Agency (HESA) and Professor Charles Oppenheim (University of Loughborough). The project wasoverseen by a Project Board whose members were Michael Jubb (RIN), Phil Sykes (University of Liverpool and RLUK),Stephen Town (University of York), Jan Wilkinson (University of Manchester and RLUK), and Nicola Wright (LSE).We wish to thank all those in universities across the UK who gave freely of their time in providing information andevidence to us; and SCONUL for allowing us access to its data.List of iation of College and Research LibrariesArts, Humanities and Social SciencesGrade Point AverageHigher Education Pay and Prices IndexHigher Education Statistics AgencyOpen AccessPrincipal Component AnalysisResearch Assessment ExerciseResearch Councils UKREFResearch Excellence FrameworkRIMSResearch Information Management SystemRINResearch Information NetworkRLUKResearch Libraries UKROIReturn on InvestmentRSOResearch Support OfficeSCONUL Society of Colleges, National and University LibrariesSTEMScience, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsVLEVirtual Learning EnvironmentVREVirtual Research Environment

ContentsExecutive summaryPage 4IntroductionPage 102.The environment for libraries and researchPage 123.A map of the value that libraries providePage 184.Good libraries help institutions to recruit and retain top researchersPage 225.Libraries help researchers win grants and contractsPage 266.Libraries promote and exploit new technologies and new modelsof scholarly communicationsPage 30Repositories increase the visability of the institution and raise itsresearch profile8.Outward-facing libraries contribute to institution-wide initiativesPage 349.Specialist staff work in partnership with academic departments10.Connecting with researchers enhances the value of the library’s servicesPage 4211.Dedicated spaces provide a better work environment for researchers12.Convenient access to high-quality research content remains a keyfoundation for good researchPage 5013.Page 607.Libraries are a physical manifestation of the values of the academyand of scholarship14.Review of evidencePage 38Page 46Page 54Page 62

Executive summaryExecutive summaryAim and approachThis report presents the findings of a systematic study ofthe value of the services that libraries in the UK provideto researchers, and of the contributions that librariesfrom a wide range of institutions make to institutionalresearch performance. The aim was to identify the keycharacteristics of library provision to support research insuccessful UK universities and departments.The approach comprised two main elements: quantitativeanalysis of statistics – from SCONUL, HESA, and the RAE,along with bibliometric data - to investigate correlationsbetween the characteristics and behaviours of librariesin 67 UK HE institutions, and the research performanceof those institutions; and gathering and analysing a largetranche of qualitative information from nine institutionswith a range of characteristics.Statistical and qualitative evidenceOur initial hope was that analysis of statistical trendsand correlations would provide evidence and suggestavenues to explore in the qualitative phase of the project.The limitations of the available statistical data on libraryprovision and characteristics, however, mean that ourstatistical analyses have been of limited utility.4This report is therefore based on a large weight ofqualitative evidence, gathered from interviews and focusgroups with a range of stakeholders – researchers, PVCsResearch, the Research Support Office, Graduate Deansand Finance Directors as well as librarians - across nineinstitutions, and carefully analysed and cross checked.Such evidence is based on individual perceptions andexperiences, but we believe that in the aggregate, theevidence on the value of libraries set out in this documentis robust and unequivocal. Libraries contribute to theresearch performance of individuals and institutions inmany different ways, even if the nature and extent of thatcontribution is not well understood by researchers andsenior managers.Our findings are summarised in the form of map whichsets out the key characteristics and behaviours of libraries,and the links between them and the performance ofindividual researchers and institutions. Libraries havechanged and are changing, developing new roles andservices. Our detailed findings are thus presented in theform of ten stories – summarised in the map - about thedifferent kinds of value that libraries provide in supportingboth individual researchers and the research performanceof their host institutions.

The value of libraries for research and researchersLibrary behaviour orcharacteristcInformation andorganisational skillsIntermediate outcomes andbenefitsGood knowledge ofexternal environmentGood subject expertiseIncreased potentialreadership of researchClose relationshipswith researchersProactive informationspecialistsMore research incomeWider institutional roleIncreased visability ofresearchStrong service cultureManifestation ofscholarshipOutward-facing libraryResearcher-focusedservicesStrong researchmaterialsImproved researchpracticesPublicly availablecatalogue of researchmaterialsEnd benefitsBetter informedresearchersFlexible physical spaceOpportunities forbrowsingManaging institutionalrepositoryNew research interestsor directionImproved institutionalunderstanding ofinformation assetsBetter researchmanagementHigher qualityresearchRecruitment andretention of higherquality researchersMore efficient researchImproved coordinationof research activitesMore satisfiedresearchersGood reputation ofinstitution for researchGreater researchoutputMore motivatedresearchersNeutral position atcentre of institutionBetter researchenvironmentLegacy perceptionof library as home ofknowledge5

Key messages1. Good libraries help institutions to recruit and retaintop researchers4. Repositories increase the visibility of the institution andraise its research profileThere is global competition for top researchers, andinstitutional reputation is key to attracting them. Manyfactors contribute to a good reputation, including leaguetables, RAE scores, research productivity and fundinglevels. But the library also contributes, positively ornegatively, to an institution’s reputation. The quality,nature, and extent of the library’s collections, of its staffand the services they provide, and of its buildings areall important. Successful and high-quality libraries canbe a significant factor in recruiting and retaining topresearchers.Most institutions now have repositories to store and makeavailable institutional assets such as research papers andtheses. In most cases, the library runs the repository onbehalf of the institution, and senior institutional managersacknowledge the role the repository plays in increasing thevisibility of the institution’s outputs and raising its researchprofile. But repositories are only as valuable as the contentthey hold, and now the focus is on increasing the volumeof content, by making it routine for researchers to deposittheir outputs. Libraries are now playing an increasingrole in educating researchers and building more effectiveprocedures and approaches across the institution.2. Libraries help researchers win research grants andcontractsSuccess in winning research grants and contracts iscritically-important, especially for research-intensiveuniversities. Research Support Offices help researchersto generate a regular flow of high-quality applicationsfor such grants and contracts, but libraries are playingan increasingly significant role too. On the whole theydo so in response to specific requests rather than proactively, however, and in general researchers are notrequired to consult the library in generating their bids.Libraries could play a greater role if researchers knew thatsupport was available, and if their involvement was moreformalised. Libraries have an opportunity to use their skillsto help researchers improve the quality of their fundingapplications, and to increase the institution’s success inwinning research income.3. Libraries promote and exploit new technologies andnew models of scholarly communicationsLibraries are critically important in helping researchersto exploit the full benefits and opportunities of thenetworked world, including such developments as openaccess and social media. But libraries are not alwayswell-equipped to promote change, and researcherssometimes resist efforts to modify their behaviours andpractices. Nevertheless, many libraries have succeeded inaddressing such problems, by establishing stronger linkswith researchers and re focusing their services to promoteand exploit new technologies and new models of scholarlycommunication.65. Outward-facing libraries contribute to institution-wideinitiativesIn recent years, many libraries have demonstrated thatthey can seize opportunities to help institutions respondto changes in the research environment. Libraries’ centraland impartial position, together with their informationand organisation expertise, puts them in a good positionto play a wide institutional role and deliver new value.Seizing these opportunities is not always straightforward,since in some institutions libraries have to overcometraditional views about their appropriate role. Butoutward-facing libraries can help in joining up researchsupport and administration, leading to better researchmanagement and a higher profile for the library across theinstitution.6. Specialist staff work in partnership with academicdepartmentsInformation specialists - both subject specialists and thosewith a specific focus on the needs of researchers - forma significant group of the library staff in most institutions.The researchers who make use of them see them as vital.But too often information specialists and researchers arenot well connected. Putting that right can alter specialists’roles profoundly, shifting them away from more traditionalcollection management roles. Where this change hastaken place, information specialists take a more proactiverole, working in partnership with academic departmentsand acting as consultants. Such developments have beenwelcomed by heads of departments and researchers.

The value of libraries for research and researchers7. Connecting with researchers enhances the value of thelibrary’s servicesThe digital revolution has changed the relationshipbetween libraries and researchers, many of whom do notuse the physical library. As one librarian said, “the morewe do to make access quick, seamless and easy, the moreinvisible we make ourselves”. Libraries are becomingalert to their separation from researchers, and are trying tofind ways to reconnect with them, and to fill the gaps intheir knowledge and understanding of researchers’ needs.Such an approach can lead to a strong service culturepermeating the library, increasing researcher satisfaction,as well as winning recognition and respect for the libraryacross the institution.8. Dedicated spaces provide a better work environmentfor researchersFor some researchers the physical library is valued as aplace to work and study, particularly if they do not havetheir own departmental space or if they rely for theirresearch on printed or manuscript content held in thelibrary. Many researchers find, however, that the library iscrowded with undergraduates, especially in term time, andthat it provides a difficult environment in which to work.In order to meet researchers’ needs, some libraries havetherefore created dedicated areas for them, providing abetter environment for those researchers who depend onthe library and its contentshelp libraries to meet researchers’ needs more effectivelyas well as helping their dialogue with the senior managersfrom whom they seek funding.10. Libraries are a physical manifestation of the values ofthe academy and of scholarshipLibraries are one of the most enduring features ofthe academy, central to the values and the practiceof scholarship. But in a period of austerity they areincreasingly being asked to justify their existence.Perhaps the deepest, yet most elusive, contribution thatlibraries make is to provide a physical manifestation ofthe scholarly ethos that universities exist to inculcate andpreserve. There is a risk that this intrinsic value may notbe recognised by future generations of researchers whowork in an online world. In building the evidence as tolibraries’ contribution to research, it is important to stressthat the whole is greater than the sum of the parts; andthat the value of the library is as a crucial cornerstoneand representation of the values of the academy and ofscholarship.9. Easy access to high-quality content is a key foundationfor good researchAccess to high-quality content remains crucial to research,and its value is recognised by researchers, senior managersand librarians alike. Libraries spend huge amounts tosustain and develop their collections, and researchersacross the sector now have access to more content thanever before. But they always want more. The downwardpressure on institutional budgets, continuing increasesin subscription costs at above inflation levels, andfluctuations in exchange rates, are making it more difficultto sustain the current level of purchasing. Some librariesare still seeking to increase the content budget, but othersare reducing the amounts of content they buy, while yetothers are seeking to be smarter by procuring more withless. ‘Daring to be different’, and taking a more evidencebased, strategic approach to content procurement, should7

Continuing change and risks: the need foran evidence baseLibraries are changing and the value they providewill change too. This project has provided a snapshotof libraries based on current evidence, as the HEsector begins a period of turbulent change. The needto demonstrate value will endure and should not beunderestimated. Arguing the case for libraries may getharder as the traditional role of libraries in providingaccess to content – the role most frequently mentionedand valued by researchers and senior managers –continues to become less visible.We frequently spoke to senior researchers and managerswhose experience of research began before the digitalrevolution, and who tend to see the value of librariesresiding in their traditional role as content providers. Suchperceptions may come under increasing scrutiny as budgetpressures mount, and as current senior managers arereplaced by those whose experience is of a different world,with a different set of assumptions. A big challenge forlibraries, therefore, is to communicate to both researchersand senior managers how they are changing, and theopportunities for the future. Should traditional perceptionspersist, there is the danger that the development of newroles and services will be put at risk. Further work to buildthe evidence base is therefore critical. But in so doing, itis important to stress that libraries must be judged beyondthe immediate needs they serve; and that the value of anylibrary is inextricably linked to the values of the university.We hope that this report provides a framework fordemonstrating the contribution libraries can and do makecurrently to the performance of researchers, researchteams and institutions. But further work for the future willrequire better statistical evidence on library characteristicsand activities.8That in turn will require working with SCONUL and itsmembers, or finding other ways to gather statistics on howlibraries support research, including, for example, trainingin information skills, support for individual researchprojects, and the development of institutional repositories.If possible, the statistics should provide breakdowns of theprovision focused on the needs of specific departments orcost centres.Gathering data of this kind need not be formalised to thesame extent as the collection of the returns to SCONULand HESA. Periodic lightweight surveys may suffice, inorder to gather evidence to test particular hypotheses orinvestigate specific areas of provision.

The value of libraries for research and researchers9

Introduction1. IntroductionPurpose and objectivesThis report presents the findings of a systematic study ofthe value of the services that academic libraries in theUK provide to researchers, and of the contributions thatthey make to institutional research performance. This isan important theme in RLUK’s current strategic plan, andcomplements RIN’s aim to develop an evidence base onthe provision of information services to researchers. Thereport is intended primarily for university librarians andtheir staff, but we believe it should also be of interestto research funders, and to senior managers and policymakers in the higher education sector.The specific objectives of the project were to: investigate, across a range of universities anddepartments with differing records of success inresearch, the nature and extent of the provisionof library services for researchers, including suchcharacteristics as:- the volume and range of content provided;- the nature, range and extent of the services providedby subject specialists and others.10 investigate changes over the past decade in keyindicators of research performance and in keycharacteristics of library provision.assess any correlations between key features of libraryprovision and of research performance.ApproachThe approach comprised two main elements: quantitativeanalysis of statistics to investigate correlations betweenthe characteristics and behaviours of libraries in 67 UKHE institutions, and the research performance of thoseinstitutions; and gathering and analysing a large tranche ofqualitative information from nine institutions with a rangeof characteristics.The quantitative analysis was based on: SCONUL statistics measuring various librarycharacteristics; statistics published by HESA covering such matters asnumbers of staff and research students; research grantsand contract income (particularly in comparison withtotal income);

The value of libraries for research and researchers bibliographic data on the numbers and impact ofpublications produced;evidence submitted to and the results of the RAEs of2001 and 2008.The study was undertaken between April and September2010. The qualitative information included interviewsand focus groups with a range of librarians and membersof the research communities in the selected institutionsand subject domains. A more detailed account of the1methodology is available on the RLUK and RIN websites.The study also draws on evidence from relevant previousstudies, some of which have taken different approachesto demonstrating the value of academic libraries (eg byattempting to calculate a return on investment).ScopeLibrariesThis project covers academic libraries in UK HEinstitutions, not just RLUK institutions. It thus coverslibraries which differ significantly in the range of functionsthey fulfil and services they provide, as well as theplace they occupy in broader institutional structures(for example, whether or not they are converged with ITservices). The picture presented in this report of the valueof libraries is therefore an amalgam of many differentlibraries rather than any individual library. The table inSection 3 provides an overview of the services offered bylibraries to different groups of users and stakeholders.TerminologyA range of terms is used across the sector to describesimilar concepts and practices relating to library servic

2. Libraries help researchers win research grants and contracts Success in winning research grants and contracts is critically-important, especially for research-intensive universities. Research Support Offices help researchers to generate a regular flow of high-quality applications for such grants and contracts, but libraries are playing

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan