TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARDMore Than Recycling –Best Practices in Airport Waste ManagementTuesday, February 5, 20192:00-3:30 PM ET
PurposeDiscuss research from the Airport Cooperative ResearchProgram (ACRP) Research Synthesis 92: Airport WasteManagement and Recycling Practices.Learning ObjectivesAt the end of this webinar, you will be able to: Describe the waste management hierarchy and strategiesapplied at each level Determine how to find strategy toolkits developed throughthis project
ACRP WebinarMore Than Recycling - Best Practices inAirport Waste ManagementFebruary 5, 2019
B. J. Carpenter, REM, CESSWICity of Austin/Austin-Bergstrom International AirportSustainability ProgramCoordinator 2.5 years with AustinBergstrom 20 years in environmentalfield Glorified Dumpster Diver
Five Ways to Get Involved!Visit us online:www.trb.org/ACRP
Today’s SpeakersMorgan TurnerMead & Hunt, Inc.andJeremy WebbPort of Seattle / Seattle-TacomaInternational AirportPresenting ACRP Synthesis 92Airport Waste Management and Recycling Practices
ACRP SYNTHESIS 92Airport Waste Management andRecycling PracticesMorgan TurnerMead & Hunt
Morgan TurnerPrincipal InvestigatorAirport Recycling and WastePlanning Service Leader,Mead & HuntFormer Airport Planner,Environmental Health and SafetySpecialist, and Airport Engineer
ACRP Synthesis 92 Oversight PanelKane Carpenter, Austin-Bergstrom International AirportJerry Haws, City of Phoenix Aviation DepartmentLiza Milagro, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International AirportBryan C. Wagoner, Wayne County Airport Authority-DTWJeremy Webb, Port of Seattle Aviation DivisionJerry P Williams, Denver International AirportShenghua Wu, University of South AlabamaJennell Barrilleaux, FAA LiaisonChristine Greencher, TRB LiaisonGail Staba, TRB Staff Officer
ACRP Synthesis 92: Airport Waste Management and Recycling PracticesFocuses on airport waste management and recycling practicesIncorporates findings from literature review, airport survey, andcase example airport interviewsIncludes toolkits of existing effective practicesPublished September 2018
Research rstandingKey StakeholdersReduce ImpactsConserveResourcesProvide Benefits
Research ApproachLiterature ReviewAirport Survey ACRP Studies FAA Resources US EPA Resources Other Reports 36 AirportsCase ExampleInterviews 21 Airports
Research Results: Survey Representation
Research Results: Drivers and ChallengesEstablished Drivers RequirementsFinancial Impacts/CostsEnvironmental ImpactsRequests/ExpectationsOther AirportsEmerging Drivers International MarketGreenhouse Gas /Carbon AccountingSocial ImpactsZero Waste GoalsResource ManagementCircular EconomyAirport Challenges Security Restrictions Limited Resources Stakeholder ChallengesWaste ManagementIndustry Challenges Varied MetricsContaminationLost CaptureMaterial Markets
Research Results: Program Management tivesTargetsPurchasingRoles &ResponsibilitiesPoliciesPlans &Procedures
Research Results: Physical StrategiesSource ReductionReuseRecyclingCompostEnergyRecovery Food Donation Other Donation Liquid Collection
Research Results: Stakeholder Practices and Other cession& RetailCommunicationEducationTraining
Research Results: Effective PracticesFoodDonationTerminalRecycling forPassengersStrongSignagePay AsYou ThrowFees forTenantsMeasuring &Monitoring ofMetricsOffice/WorkplaceRecycling ning forEmployees &TenantsTenant &Service ProviderContractingDesigned mposting
Research Results: Data and Metrics
Case Example: AUS
Case Example: COS
Case Example: DEN
Case Example: LAS
Case Example: MSP
Case Example: PDX
Case Example: SFO
Case Example: SLC
Case Example: SMF
Case ExamplesABQATL Reuse of previous containers Sole source procurement process Stakeholder survey Coreless toilet paper rolls Eliminated toilet paper cardboard packaging Requiring compostable serviceware and carryout containersDTW Employee tumblers and mugsEWR Recycle Across America container labels
Case ExamplesMKE Airside airline recycling facilityPAE Recycling from Airport areasPHL Dealing with liquids/contamination Dedicated recycling coordinatorPHX Waste stream composition study
Case ExamplesRNO Airside recycling facility Self-haul of recyclablesSAN Plastic film recycling Recycling from Airport areasSEA “Pay As You Throw” waste charges and usage monitoring Airfield recyclingTUL Transitioning to recycling from energy-from-waste
ToolkitsContractingEnvironmental Preferred PurchasingFood DonationTerminal RecyclingOffice/Workplace RecyclingLiquid CollectionBack-of-House CompostingMetricsSignageTraining
Future ResearchInfluence of economic factors (tipping fees)Cost benefit analysis of practicesWaste reduction strategiesEvaluation of airline and concessionaire practicesAnalysis of passenger behaviors and terminal signageEvaluation of metrics and identification of standardStrategies for coordination with waste haulers and custodial staff
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONMorgan Turnermorgan.turner@meadhunt.com
ACRP SYTHESIS REPORT 92Airport Waste Management andRecycling PracticesJeremy Webb, Seattle-TacomaInternational Airport (SEA) Port of Seattle
Jeremy WebbProject PanelistEnvironmental Program Manager,Seattle-Tacoma International AirportAviation Environmental ProgramsSustainability & ComplianceEPA, FAA, and local waste industryresearch contributorAmerican Association of AirportExecutives MemberWashington State Recycling AssociationMember
General Takeaways from ReportNew go-to airport recycling referenceDiverse perspectives and Regional contextCommon strategies, trends, and priorities and challengesCompetition prompts comparisons but measurement methods posechallengesCase examples provide practical guides based on successful strategiesToolkits highlight best-in-class waste prevention, recycling, anddiversion solutions
SEA’s Waste Diversion gramWhat’snext?
SEA Activity and Waste ProfileActivity47 million passengers1,500 employees28 airlines90 ConcessionsWasteTerminal:8,223 generated3,018 diverted37% (goal 60%)Airfield:2,862 generated235 diverted8% (goal 15%)
SEA Case Example Highlights (Appendix 20)25 years recyclingAirport &PublicSupportTerminal,Airside,LandsidePassengers, Service &marketaccessPolicy nomicsMore
ChallengesContaminationChina recyclingrestrictionsParticipationGrowth &CapacityTrainingIndustry,MarketChanges
Solid Waste Management PlanningRoadmap to successUpdate in 2019/2020 (5-year cycle)FAA Recycling Plan CompliantDocument conditionsSet Goals and PrioritiesEvaluate StrategiesApp 9,18,20,24
Forecast and Capacity AnalysisProjected solid waste trendsAssessed activity and policy impactsIdentified system capacity limitationsSchedule system changesApp 20
Waste Characterization Study2018 Airfield Waste CharacterizationConfirmed composition, quantities, generatorsIdentified priorities and diversion opportunitiesAnalyzed disposal data to optimize outreach/policySurveyed Airfield users to assess feasibilityApp 8, 9, 20
Contracts and PolicyUpdating Rules & RegulationsSupport contamination mitigation/sanitationExpand Monitoring and EnforcementMonitoring compliance with tenant lease requirementsApp 25
Food RecoveryTriple bottom line benefitsReduce waste, feed community, reduce costsPredominant portion of terminal and airfield wasteEPA 2018 Food Recovery Challenge Regional AwardFoodDonationCompostingUsed CookingOil Recycling37,500meals692tons70 tonsApp 27, 31
Checkpoint Liquid CollectionDrain stations at each security checkpointPaired with recycle and garbage binsRefill stations beyond securityCustodial teams service and measureSecurity CheckpointRecoveryApp 30Post-Security Refill
Education and OutreachCritical for passengers, tenants, employeesRevising recycling bin labels & signage standardsUpdating tenant Recycling Guide and posters“Sustainable InSights” window graphicsApp 33,34
Infrastructure & System UpdatesCentral Terminal Core Waste CapacityCart Wash StationsInternal TransitLoading Dock StandardsResearch technologiesVolume reduction options
Researching Alternative Disposal OptionsAdvanced Material Recovery (Mixed Waste Processing)On-site Resource Consolidation & RecoveryPreliminary review of waste-to-fuel technologiesApp 5
Contamination IssuesSignificant challengeCoordinated multi-department responseIncreased and mandatory trainingMonitoring & EnforcementChina recycling restrictionsApp 6, 15, 33,34 ComplianceInspections Training Requirements EducationMaterials HaulerCoordination
For Additional InformationJeremy WebbWebb.j@portseattle.org
Today’s Participants BJ Carpenter, Austin-Bergstrom International Airport,BJ.Carpenter@austintexas.gov Morgan Turner, Mead & Hunt, morgan.turner@meadhunt.com Jeremy Webb, Port of Seattle/Seattle Tacoma InternationalAirport, Webb.J@portseattle.org
Panelists webinars/190205.pdfAfter the webinar, you will receive a follow-up emailcontaining a link to the recording
ACRP is an Industry–Driven ProgramManaged by TRB and sponsoredby the Federal AviationAdministration (FAA).Seeks out the latest issues facingthe airport industry.Conducts research to findsolutions.Publishes and disseminatesresearch results through freepublications and webinars.
Other Ways to ParticipateBecome an Ambassador. Ambassadors representACRP at events and conferences across the country!Sponsor or become an ACRP Champion. Thechampion program is designed to help early- to midcareer, young professionals grow and excel withinthe airport industry.Visit ACRP’s Impacts on Practice webpage to submitleads on how ACRP’s research is being applied at anyairport.
Additional ACRP PublicationsAvailable on Today’s TopicReport 80:Report 100:Synthesis 42:Synthesis 66:Synthesis 77:Synthesis 81:
Upcoming ACRP WebinarsFebruary 26Digitize Your Checklists — Computerized AirportMaintenance Management (CMMS)March 12Getting Served — Legalities and Risks of AirportContractual AgreementsMarch 20Energetic Value — The Design and Economics ofMicrogrids at Airports
Best Practices in Airport Waste Management. Tuesday, February 5, 2019. 2:00-3:30 PM ET. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. . Zero Waste Goals Resource Management Circular Economy. Waste Management Industry Challenges . Solid Waste Management Planning. App 9,18,20,24. Projected solid waste trends
Transportation Engineering The transportation engineering faculty offer graduate course in transportation planning, design, operations and safety with an emphasis on surface transportation. The faculty are engaged in research in transportation planning and safety, intelligent transportation systems, transportation systems analysis, traffic flow .
Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2009–2010 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Director, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 WWW.TRB.ORG VIII Biennial Asilomar Conference September 2001 Transportation, Energy, and Environmental Policy: Managing Transitions ISBN -309-08571-3 Managing Transitions Transportation, Energy, and Environmental Policy
for Nursing (69) Delaware Board of Nursing (12) District of Columbia Board of Nursing (75) Florida Board of Nursing (70) Georgia Board of Nursing (31) Guam Board of Nurse Examiners (87) Hawaii Board of Nursing (37) Idaho Board of Nursing (82) Illinois Board of Nursing (49) Indiana State Board of Nursing (48) Iowa Board of Nursing (60)
for Transportation Policy (CTP) publishes rigorous, objective analyses of the problems facing transportation and provides ideas for and a clear path towards possible solutions. CTP also publishes a monthly transportation newsletter that reaches 2,000 individuals directly plus another 40,000 through the Transportation Research Board (TRB).
fee basis. Airlines, railroads, transit agencies, common carrier trucking companies, and pipelines are examples of for-hire transportation. Other types of transportation are discussed in Chapter 2. Box 1-1: Transportation Services Index The Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ (BTS) Transportation Services Index (TSI) measures the
Transportation's contribution to the economy can be measured by its contribution to gross domestic product (GDP). GDP is an economic measure of all goods and services produced . Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2017. Transportation-Related Final Demand by GDP Component Figure 2-1 shows total .
The overall goals of asset management are to minimize long-term costs, extend the life of the transportation system, and improve the transportation system's performance. The Iowa Department of Transportation's (DOT's) guiding principles for transportation asset management are the following: Asset management is policy driven.