Sachpazis Propped Cantilever Retaining Wall Example

2y ago
15 Views
3 Downloads
267.65 KB
17 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Olive Grimm
Transcription

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd byDate1App'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoRETAINING WALL ANALYSISIn accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February2009 and the recommended valuesRetaining wall detailsStem type;Stem height;Propped cantileverhstem 5500 mmProp height;hprop 4500 mmStem thickness;tstem 500 mmAngle to rear face of stem;α 90 degStem density;γstem 25 kN/mToe length;ltoe 1000 mmHeel length;lheel 3000 mmBase thickness;tbase 500 mmKey position;pkey 4150 mmKey depth;dkey 500 mmKey thickness;tkey 350 mmBase density;γbase 25 kN/mHeight of retained soil;hret 5000 mm33Angle of soil surface;β 0 degDepth of cover;dcover 500 mmHeight of water;hwater 150 mmWater density;γw 9.8 kN/m3

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoRetained soil propertiesSoil type;Very loose gravelMoist density;γmr 16 kN/mSaturated density;γsr 20 kN/m331App'd byDate

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoCharacteristic effective shear resistance angle;φ'r.k 26 degCharacteristic wall friction angle;δr.k 13 degBase soil propertiesSoil type;Firm clayMoist density;γmb 18 kN/mCharacteristic cohesion;c'b.k 25 kN/mCharacteristic adhesion;ab.k 20 kN/mCharacteristic effective shear resistance angle;φ'b.k 18 degCharacteristic wall friction angle;δb.k 9 degCharacteristic base friction angle;δbb.k 12 deg322Loading detailsVariable surcharge load;SurchargeQ 50 kN/m2Calculate retaining wall geometryBase length;lbase ltoe tstem lheel 4500 mmBase height;hbase tbase dkey 1000 mmSaturated soil height;hsat hwater dcover 650 mmMoist soil height;hmoist hret - hwater 4850 mmLength of surcharge load;lsur lheel 3000 mm- Distance to vertical component;xsur v lbase - lheel / 2 3000 mmEffective height of wall;heff hbase dcover hret 6500 mm- Distance to horizontal component;xsur h heff / 2 - dkey 2750 mmArea of wall stem;Astem hstem tstem 2.75 m- Distance to vertical component;xstem ltoe tstem / 2 1250 mmArea of wall base;Abase lbase tbase dkey tkey 2.425 m- Distance to vertical component;xbase (lbase tbase / 2 dkey tkey (pkey tkey / 2))Area of saturated soil;Asat hsat lheel 1.95 m- Distance to vertical component;xsat v lbase - (hsat lheel / 2) / Asat 3000 mm- Distance to horizontal component;xsat h (hsat hbase) / 3 - dkey 50 mmArea of water;Awater hsat lheel 1.95 m- Distance to vertical component;xwater v lbase - (hsat lheel / 2) / Asat 3000 mm- Distance to horizontal component;xwater h (hsat hbase) / 3 - dkey 50 mmArea of moist soil;Amoist hmoist lheel 14.55 m222/ Abase 2400 mm222222- Distance to vertical component;xmoist v lbase - (hmoist lheel / 2) / Amoist 3000 mm- Distance to horizontal component;xmoist h (hmoist (tbase hsat hmoist / 3) / 2 (hsat hbase) ((hsat hbase)/2 - dkey)) / (hsat hbase hmoist /2) 1778 mm2Area of base soil;Apass dcover ltoe 0.5 m- Distance to vertical component;xpass v lbase - (dcover ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Apass 500 mm

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info- Distance to horizontal component;xpass h (dcover hbase) / 3- dkey 0 mmArea of excavated base soil;Aexc hpass ltoe 0.5 m- Distance to vertical component;xexc v lbase - (hpass ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Aexc 500- Distance to horizontal component;xexc h (hpass hbase) / 3- dkey 0 mm2mmPartial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 1Permanent unfavourable action;γG 1.35Permanent favourable action;γGf 1.00Variable unfavourable action;γQ 1.50Variable favourable action;γQf 0.00Partial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 1Angle of shearing resistance;γφ' 1.00Effective cohesion;γc' 1.00Weight density;γγ 1.00Retained soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle;φ'r.d atan(tan(φ'r.k) / γφ') 26 degDesign wall friction angle;δr.d atan(tan(δr.k) / γφ') 13 degBase soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle;φ'b.d atan(tan(φ'b.k) / γφ') 18 degDesign wall friction angle;δb.d atan(tan(δb.k) / γφ') 9 degDesign base friction angle;δbb.d atan(tan(δbb.k) / γφ') 12 degDesign effective cohesion;c'b.d c'b.k / γc' 25 kN/mDesign adhesion;ab.d ab.k / γc' 20 kN/m22Using Coulomb theoryActive pressure coefficient;22KA sin(α φ'r.d) / (sin(α) sin(α - δr.d) [1 [sin(φ'r.d δr.d) sin(φ'r.d - β) / (sin(α - δr.d) sin(α 2β))]] ) 0.353Passive pressure coefficient;2KP sin(90 - φ'b.d) / (sin(90 δb.d) [1 - [sin(φ'b.d 2δb.d) sin(φ'b.d) / (sin(90 δb.d))]] ) 2.359Bearing pressure checkVertical forces on wallWall stem;Fstem γG Astem γstem 92.8 kN/mWall base;Fbase γG Abase γbase 81.8 kN/mSurcharge load;Fsur v γQ SurchargeQ lheel 225 kN/mSaturated retained soil;Fsat v γG Asat (γsr - γw) 26.8 kN/mWater;Fwater v γG Awater γw 25.8 kN/mMoist retained soil;Fmoist v γG Amoist γmr 314.3 kN/mBase soil;Fpass v γG Apass γmb 12.2 kN/m

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd byDate1App'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoTotal;Ftotal v Fstem Fbase Fsat v Fmoist v Fpass v Fwater v Fsur v 778.7 kN/mHorizontal forces on wallSurcharge load;Fsur h KA cos(δr.d) γQ SurchargeQ heff Saturated retained soil;Fsat h γG KA cos(δr.d) (γsr - γw) (hsat hbase)167.8 kN/m2/ 2 6.4 kN/mWater;2Fwater h γG γw (hwater dcover hbase) / 2 18kN/mMoist retained soil;Fmoist h γG KA cos(δr.d) γmr ((heff - hsat 2hbase) / 2 (heff - hsat - hbase) (hsat hbase)) 146.9kN/mTotal;Ftotal h Fsat h Fmoist h Fwater h Fsur h 339.2kN/mMoments on wallWall stem;Mstem Fstem xstem 116 kNm/mWall base;Mbase Fbase xbase 196.4 kNm/mSurcharge load;Msur Fsur v xsur v - Fsur h xsur h 213.6 kNm/mSaturated retained soil;Msat Fsat v xsat v - Fsat h xsat h 80.2 kNm/mWater;Mwater Fwater v xwater v - Fwater h xwater h 76.6Moist retained soil;Mmoist Fmoist v xmoist v - Fmoist h xmoist h 681.6kNm/mkNm/mBase soil;Total;Mpass Fpass v xpass v 6.1 kNm/mMtotal Mstem Mbase Msat Mmoist Mpass Mwater Msur 1370.5 kNm/mCheck bearing pressureMaximum friction force;Ffriction max Ftotal v tan(δbb.d) 165.5 kN/mMaximum base soil resistance;Fpass h max γGf KP cos(δb.d) γmb (dcover 2hbase) / 2 47.2 kN/mBase soil resistance;Fpass h min(max((Mtotal Ftotal h (hprop tbase) Ffriction max (hprop tbase) - Ftotal v lbase / 2) / (xpass h- hprop - tbase), 0 kN/m), Fpass h max) 0 kN/mPropping force;Fprop stem min((Ftotal v lbase / 2 - Mtotal) / (hprop tbase), Ftotal h) 76.3 kN/mFriction force;Ffriction Ftotal h - Fpass h - Fprop stem 262.8 kN/mMoment from propping force;Mprop Fprop stem (hprop tbase) 381.7 kNm/mDistance to reaction; x (Mtotal Mprop) / Ftotal v 2250 mmEccentricity of reaction;e x - lbase / 2 0 mmLoaded length of base;lload lbase 4500 mm

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info2Bearing pressure at toe;qtoe Ftotal v / lbase 173.1 kN/mBearing pressure at heel;qheel Ftotal v / lbase 173.1 kN/mEffective overburden pressure;q (tbase dcover) γmb - (tbase dcover hwater) γw 6.7 kN/m222Design effective overburden pressure;q' q / γγ 6.7 kN/mBearing resistance factors;Nq Exp(π tan(φ'b.d)) (tan(45 deg φ'b.d / 2)) 25.258Nc (Nq - 1) cot(φ'b.d) 13.104Nγ 2 (Nq - 1) tan(φ'b.d) 2.767Foundation shape factors;sq 1sγ 1sc 1Load inclination factors;H Ftotal h - Fprop stem - Ffriction 0 kN/mV Ftotal v 778.7 kN/mm 2miq [1 - H / (V lload c'b.d cot(φ'b.d))] 1iγ [1 - H / (V lload c'b.d cot(φ'b.d))](m 1) 1ic iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc tan(φ'b.d)) 1Net ultimate bearing capacity;nf c'b.d Nc sc ic q' Nq sq iq 0.5 (γmb2- γw) lload Nγ sγ iγ 413.9 kN/mFactor of safety;FoSbp nf / max(qtoe, qheel) 2.392PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressurePartial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 2Permanent unfavourable action;γG 1.00Permanent favourable action;γGf 1.00Variable unfavourable action;γQ 1.30Variable favourable action;γQf 0.00Partial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 2Angle of shearing resistance;γφ' 1.25Effective cohesion;γc' 1.25Weight density;γγ 1.00Retained soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle;φ'r.d atan(tan(φ'r.k) / γφ') 21.3 degDesign wall friction angle;δr.d atan(tan(δr.k) / γφ') 10.5 degBase soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle;φ'b.d atan(tan(φ'b.k) / γφ') 14.6 degDesign wall friction angle;δb.d atan(tan(δb.k) / γφ') 7.2 degDesign base friction angle;δbb.d atan(tan(δbb.k) / γφ') 9.7 degDesign effective cohesion;c'b.d c'b.k / γc' 20 kN/mDesign adhesion;ab.d ab.k / γc' 16 kN/m22

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoUsing Coulomb theoryActive pressure coefficient;22KA sin(α φ'r.d) / (sin(α) sin(α - δr.d) [1 [sin(φ'r.d δr.d) sin(φ'r.d - β) / (sin(α - δr.d) sin(α 2β))]] ) 0.425Passive pressure coefficient;2KP sin(90 - φ'b.d) / (sin(90 δb.d) [1 - [sin(φ'b.d 2δb.d) sin(φ'b.d) / (sin(90 δb.d))]] ) 1.965Bearing pressure checkVertical forces on wallWall stem;Fstem γG Astem γstem 68.8 kN/mWall base;Fbase γG Abase γbase 60.6 kN/mSurcharge load;Fsur v γQ SurchargeQ lheel 195 kN/mSaturated retained soil;Fsat v γG Asat (γsr - γw) 19.9 kN/mWater;Fwater v γG Awater γw 19.1 kN/mMoist retained soil;Fmoist v γG Amoist γmr 232.8 kN/mBase soil;Fpass v γG Apass γmb 9 kN/mTotal;Ftotal v Fstem Fbase Fsat v Fmoist v Fpass v Fwater v Fsur v 605.2 kN/mHorizontal forces on wallSurcharge load;Fsur h KA cos(δr.d) γQ SurchargeQ heff 176.5 kN/mSaturated retained soil;Fsat h γG KA cos(δr.d) (γsr - γw) (hsat hbase)2/ 2 5.8 kN/mWater;2Fwater h γG γw (hwater dcover hbase) / 2 13.4kN/mMoist retained soil;Fmoist h γG KA cos(δr.d) γmr ((heff - hsat 2hbase) / 2 (heff - hsat - hbase) (hsat hbase)) 132.1kN/mTotal;Ftotal h Fsat h Fmoist h Fwater h Fsur h 327.8kN/mMoments on wallWall stem;Mstem Fstem xstem 85.9 kNm/mWall base;Mbase Fbase xbase 145.5 kNm/mSurcharge load;Msur Fsur v xsur v - Fsur h xsur h 99.5 kNm/mSaturated retained soil;Msat Fsat v xsat v - Fsat h xsat h 59.3 kNm/mWater;Mwater Fwater v xwater v - Fwater h xwater h 56.7kNm/mMoist retained soil;Mmoist Fmoist v xmoist v - Fmoist h xmoist h 463.5kNm/mBase soil;Mpass Fpass v xpass v 4.5 kNm/m

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoTotal;Mtotal Mstem Mbase Msat Mmoist Mpass Mwater Msur 915 kNm/mCheck bearing pressureMaximum friction force;Ffriction max Ftotal v tan(δbb.d) 102.9 kN/mMaximum base soil resistance;Fpass h max γGf KP cos(δb.d) γmb (dcover 2hbase) / 2 39.5 kN/mBase soil resistance;Fpass h min(max((Mtotal Ftotal h (hprop tbase) Ffriction max (hprop tbase) - Ftotal v lbase / 2) / (xpass h- hprop - tbase), 0 kN/m), Fpass h max) 0 kN/mFprop stem min((Ftotal v lbase / 2 - Mtotal) / (hprop Propping force;tbase), Ftotal h) 89.3 kN/mFriction force;Ffriction Ftotal h - Fpass h - Fprop stem 238.5 kN/mMoment from propping force;Mprop Fprop stem (hprop tbase) 446.7 kNm/mDistance to reaction; x (Mtotal Mprop) / Ftotal v 2250 mmEccentricity of reaction;e x - lbase / 2 0 mmLoaded length of base;lload lbase 4500 mmBearing pressure at toe;qtoe Ftotal v / lbase 134.5 kN/mBearing pressure at heel;qheel Ftotal v / lbase 134.5 kN/mEffective overburden pressure;q (tbase dcover) γmb - (tbase dcover hwater) γw 6.7 kN/m2222Design effective overburden pressure;q' q / γγ 6.7 kN/mBearing resistance factors;Nq Exp(π tan(φ'b.d)) (tan(45 deg φ'b.d / 2)) 23.784Nc (Nq - 1) cot(φ'b.d) 10.711Nγ 2 (Nq - 1) tan(φ'b.d) 1.447Foundation shape factors;sq 1sγ 1Load inclination factors;sc 1H Ftotal h - Fprop stem - Ffriction 0 kN/mV Ftotal v 605.2 kN/mm 2miq [1 - H / (V lload c'b.d cot(φ'b.d))] 1iγ [1 - H / (V lload c'b.d cot(φ'b.d))](m 1) 1ic iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc tan(φ'b.d)) 1Net ultimate bearing capacity;nf c'b.d Nc sc ic q' Nq sq iq 0.5 (γmb2- γw) lload Nγ sγ iγ 266.3 kN/mFactor of safety;FoSbp nf / max(qtoe, qheel) 1.98PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateChk'd byDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/20131DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoRETAINING WALL DESIGNIn accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and therecommended valuesConcrete details - Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concreteConcrete strength class;Characteristic compressive cylinder strength;C30/372fck 30 N/mmCharacteristic compressive cube strength;fck,cube 37 N/mmMean value of compressive cylinder strength;fcm fck 8 N/mm 38 N/mm22222 2/3Mean value of axial tensile strength;fctm 0.3 N/mm (fck / 1 N/mm )5% fractile of axial tensile strength;fctk,0.05 0.7 fctm 2.0 N/mmSecant modulus of elasticity of concrete;Ecm 22 kN/mm (fcm / 10 N/mm )N/mm 2.9 N/mm2222 0.3 328372Partial factor for concrete - Table 2.1N;γC 1.50Compressive strength coefficient - cl.3.1.6(1);αcc 1.00Design compressive concrete strength - exp.3.15;fcd αcc fck / γC 20.0 N/mmMaximum aggregate size;hagg 20 mm2Reinforcement details2Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement;fyk 500 N/mmModulus of elasticity of reinforcement;Es 210000 N/mm2Partial factor for reinforcing steel - Table 2.1N;γS 1.15Design yield strength of reinforcement;fyd fyk / γS 435 N/mm2Cover to reinforcementFront face of stem;csf 40 mmRear face of stem;csr 50 mmTop face of base;cbt 50 mmBottom face of base;cbb 75 mmCheck stem design for maximum momentDepth of section;h 500 mmRectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1Design bending moment;M 94.6 kNm/mDepth to tension reinforcement;d h - csr - φsr / 2 442 mm2K M / (d fck) 0.016K' 0.196K' K - No compression reinforcement is requiredLever arm;0.5z min(0.5 0.5 (1 – 3.53 K) , 0.95) d 420 mmDepth of neutral axis;x 2.5 (d – z) 55 mmArea of tension reinforcement required;Asr.req M / (fyd z) 518 mm /mTension reinforcement provided;16 dia.bars @ 200 c/cArea of tension reinforcement provided;Asr.prov π φsr / (4 ssr) 1005 mm /m222

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoMinimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;Asr.min max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) d 6662mm /mMaximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);2Asr.max 0.04 h 20000 mm /mmax(Asr.req, Asr.min) / Asr.prov 0.662PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement requiredCrack control - Section 7.3Limiting crack width;wmax 0.3 mmVariable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;ψ2 0.3Serviceability bending moment;Msls 44.8 kNm/mTensile stress in reinforcement;σs Msls / (Asr.prov z) 106.2 N/mm2Load duration;Long termLoad duration factor;kt 0.4Effective area of concrete in tension;Ac.eff min(2.5 (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) 1450002mm /mMean value of concrete tensile strength;2fct.eff fctm 2.9 N/mmReinforcement ratio;ρp.eff Asr.prov / Ac.eff 0.007Modular ratio;αe Es / Ecm 6.395Bond property coefficient;k1 0.8Strain distribution coefficient;k2 0.5k3 3.4k4 0.425Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;sr.max k3 csr k1 k2 k4 φsr / ρp.eff 562 mmMaximum crack width - exp.7.8;wk sr.max max(σs – kt (fct.eff / ρp.eff) (1 αe ρp.eff), 0.6 σs) / Eswk 0.171 mmwk / wmax 0.569PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack widthRectangular section in shear - Section 6.2Design shear force;V 151.5 kN/mCRd,c 0.18 / γC 0.120k min(1 (200 mm / d), 2) 1.673ρl min(Asr.prov / d, 0.02) 0.002Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;1/2vmin 0.035 N /mm kDesign shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;3/2 fck20.5 0.415 N/mm421/3VRd.c max(CRd.c k (100 N /mm ρl fck) ,vmin) dVRd.c 183.3 kN/mV / VRd.c 0.827PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear forceRectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1Design bending moment;M 63.7 kNm/m

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateChk'd byDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/20131DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infod h - csf - φsx - φsf / 2 440 mmDepth to tension reinforcement;2K M / (d fck) 0.011K' 0.196K' K - No compression reinforcement is required0.5z min(0.5 0.5 (1 – 3.53 K) , 0.95) d Lever arm;418 mmDepth of neutral axis;x 2.5 (d – z) 55 mmArea of tension reinforcement required;Asf.req M / (fyd z) 351 mm /mTension reinforcement provided;16 dia.bars @ 200 c/cArea of tension reinforcement provided;Asf.prov π φsf / (4 ssf) 1005 mm /mMinimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;Asf.min max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) d 6632222mm /mMaximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);2Asf.max 0.04 h 20000 mm /mmax(Asf.req, Asf.min) / Asf.prov 0.659PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement requiredCrack control - Section 7.3Limiting crack width;wmax 0.3 mmVariable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;ψ2 0.3Serviceability bending moment;Msls 29.6 kNm/mTensile stress in reinforcement;σs Msls / (Asf.prov z) 70.4 N/mm2Load duration;Long termLoad duration factor;kt 0.4Effective area of concrete in tension;Ac.eff min(2.5 (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) 1483332mm /mMean value of concrete tensile strength;fct.eff fctm 2.9 N/mmReinforcement ratio;ρp.eff Asf.prov / Ac.eff 0.0072Modular ratio;αe Es / Ecm 6.395Bond property coefficient;k1 0.8Strain distribution coefficient;k2 0.5k3 3.4k4 0.425Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;sr.max k3 csf k1 k2 k4 φsf / ρp.eff 537 mmMaximum crack width - exp.7.8;wk sr.max max(σs – kt (fct.eff / ρp.eff) (1 αe ρp.eff), 0.6 σs) / Eswk 0.108 mmwk / wmax 0.36PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack widthRectangular section in shear - Section 6.2Design shear force;V 151.5 kN/mCRd,c 0.18 / γC 0.120k min(1 (200 mm / d), 2) 1.674

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateChk'd byDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/20131DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoρl min(Asf.prov / d, 0.02) 0.002Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;1/2vmin 0.035 N /mm kDesign shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;3/2 fck0.5 0.415 N/mm2421/3VRd.c max(CRd.c k (100 N /mm ρl fck) ,vmin) dVRd.c 182.7 kN/mV / VRd.c 0.829PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear forceHorizontal reinforcement parallel to face of stem - Section 9.6Minimum area of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(1);Asx.req max(0.25 Asr.prov, 0.001 tstem) 5002mm /mMaximum spacing of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(2);ssx max 400 mmTransverse reinforcement provided;12 dia.bars @ 200 c/cArea of transverse reinforcement provided;Asx.prov π φsx / (4 ssx) 565 mm /m22PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement requiredCheck base designDepth of section;h 500 mmRectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1Design bending moment at toe;M 72 kNm/mDepth to tension reinforcement;d h - cbb - φbb / 2 417 mm2K M / (d fck) 0.014K' 0.196K' K - No compression reinforcement is required0.5z min(0.5 0.5 (1 – 3.53 K) , 0.95) d Lever arm;396 mmDepth of neutral axis;x 2.5 (d – z) 52 mmArea of tension reinforcement required;Abb.req M / (fyd z) 418 mm /m2Tension reinforcement provided;16 dia.bars @ 200 c/cArea of tension reinforcement provided;Abb.prov π φbb / (4 sbb) 1005 mm /mMinimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;Abb.min max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) d 628222mm /mMaximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);2Abb.max 0.04 h 20000 mm /mmax(Abb.req, Abb.min) / Abb.prov 0.625PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement requiredCrack control - Section 7.3Limiting crack width;wmax 0.3 mmVariable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;ψ2 0.3Serviceability bending moment;Msls 39.8 kNm/mTensile stress in reinforcement;σs Msls / (Abb.prov z) 100 N/mmLoad duration;Long termLoad duration factor;kt 0.42

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateChk'd byDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/20131DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infoAc.eff min(2.5 (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) 149292Effective area of concrete in tension;2mm /mMean value of concrete tensile strength;fct.eff fctm 2.9 N/mmReinforcement ratio;ρp.eff Abb.prov / Ac.eff 0.007Modular ratio;αe Es / Ecm 6.3952Bond property coefficient;k1 0.8Strain distribution coefficient;k2 0.5k3 3.4k4 0.425Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;sr.max k3 cbb k1 k2 k4 φbb / ρp.eff 659 mmMaximum crack width - exp.7.8;wk sr.max max(σs – kt (fct.eff / ρp.eff) (1 αe ρp.eff), 0.6 σs) / Eswk 0.188 mmwk / wmax 0.628PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack widthRectangular section in shear - Section 6.2V 144 kN/mDesign shear force;CRd,c 0.18 / γC 0.120k min(1 (200 mm / d), 2) 1.693ρl min(Abb.prov / d, 0.02) 0.002Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;1/2vmin 0.035 N /mm kDesign shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;3/2 fck0.5 0.422 N/mm2421/3VRd.c max(CRd.c k (100 N /mm ρl fck) ,vmin) dVRd.c 176 kN/mV / VRd.c 0.818PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear forceRectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1Design bending moment at heel;M 186.4 kNm/mDepth to tension reinforcement;d h - cbt - φbt / 2 442 mm2K M / (d fck) 0.032K' 0.196K' K - No compression reinforcement is requiredLever arm;0.5z min(0.5 0.5 (1 – 3.53 K) , 0.95) d 420 mmDepth of neutral axis;x 2.5 (d – z) 55 mmArea of tension reinforcement required;Abt.req M / (fyd z) 1021 mm /mTension reinforcement provided;16 dia.bars @ 175 c/cArea of tension reinforcement provided;Abt.prov π φbt / (4 sbt) 1149 mm /mMinimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;Abt.min max(0.26 fctm / fyk, 0.0013) d 6662222mm /mMaximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);2Abt.max 0.04 h 20000 mm /m

ProjectJob Ref.Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN1997-1:2004incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009)SectionGEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas SachpazisCivil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company forStructural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.Sheet no./rev.Civil & Geotechnical EngineeringCalc. byDateDr.C.Sachpazis 23/05/2013Chk'd by1DateApp'd byDate-Tel.: ( 30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.: 30 210 5711461 Mobile: ( 30) 6936425722 & ( 44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.infomax(Abt.req, Abt.min) / Abt.prov 0.888PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement requiredCrack control - Section 7.3Limiting crack width;wmax 0.3 mmVariable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;ψ2 0.3Serviceability bending moment;Msls 81.2 kNm/mTensile stress in reinforcement;σs Msls / (Abt.prov z) 168.2 N/mmLoad duration;Long term2Load duration factor;kt 0.4Effective area of concrete in tension;Ac.eff min(2.5 (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) 1450002mm /mMean value of concrete tensile strength;2fct.eff fctm 2.9 N/mmReinforcement ratio;ρp.eff Abt.prov / Ac.eff 0.008Modular ratio;αe Es / Ecm 6.395Bond property coefficient;k1 0.8Strain distribution coefficient;k2 0.5k3 3.4k4 0.425Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;sr.max k3 cbt k1 k2 k4 φbt / ρp.eff 513 mmMaximum crack widt

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values Retaining wall details Stem type; Propped cantilever Stem height; h stem 5500 mm Prop height; h prop 4500 mm Stem thickness; t stem 500 mm Angle to rear

Related Documents:

The BPR typical plans present retaining wall dimensions for wall heights from 6 to 30 ft. The first type of retaining wall shown is the cantilever retaining wall on a spread footing. Also shown are pile-supported cantilever walls and counterfort walls. For our discussion we will refer only to the cantilever retaining walls on spread footings.

Fig 1. Design variables of a cantilever retaining wall model Cross-section and forces action on a typical cantilever retaining wall can be seen in Fig. 1. Fig 1. Cross section and forces acting on a cantilever retaining wal

125 Retaining walls Example 3.16 Design of a cantilever retaining wall (BS 8 110) The cantilever retaining wall shown below is backÞlled with granular material having a unit weight, ,

Cantilever Retaining Wall For feasibility level retaining wall design, we examined what we considered to be a critical section along the proposed retaining wall. Specifically, we examined the section at Station 119 00 where the highest cantilever wall will occur along with full traffic lo

Project: Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7. Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Section . Sheet no./rev. 1 Calc.Made by Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 27/02/2016 Chk'd by Date App'd by Date. Stage 1 (Generated) - Drawing Board 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15

Retaining Wall Design. 11 The objective of the study was to verify or . Pressure cells were used to measure the lateral earth pressure acting on a cantilever retaining wall and a precast panel retaining wall. Force transducers were used to measure total force acting on the precast panel wall. Measurements of wall movement were made during and .

c. Counter fort retaining wall. d. Buttress retaining wall. Cantilever retaining walls are constructed of reinforced concrete. They consist of a relatively thin stem and a base slab. The base is also divided into two parts, theheel and toe. The heel is the part of the base under the backfill. The toe is the other part of the base. The analysis .

Elliot Aronson Timothy D. Wilson Samuel R. Sommers A01_ARON1287_10_SE_FM.indd 1 12/2/17 12:08 AM. Portfolio Manager: Kelli Strieby Content Producer: Cecilia Turner/Lisa Mafrici Content Developer: Thomas Finn Portfolio Manager Assistant: Louis Fierro Executive Product Marketing Manager: Christopher Brown Senior Field Marketing Manager: Debi Doyle Content Producer Manager: Amber Mackey Content .