Welcome To The Smart Policing Initiative Phase VI .
Welcome to the Smart Policing InitiativePhase VI Inaugural MeetingBoston, MA1June 29-30, 2015This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Site Introductions and Agenda OverviewCatherine McNamee and James “Chip” R. Coldren, Jr.9:00 – 9:30 a.m.2This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Agenda Overview – June 29 3Site Introductions/Agenda OverviewWelcoming Remarks: Director Denise O’DonnellBoston Police Department KeynoteSPI Principles and PracticesSuccessful SPI Initiative: Kansas City SPIGuest Lunch Speaker: U.S. Attorney Carmen OrtizSustainability Practices in SPISmart TechnologyPeer-to-Peer NetworkingCriminology 101/Busted MythsClosing Remarks: Director O’Donnell
Agenda Overview – June 30 4Overview of Day’s AgendaSite Presentations: Toledo and PortlandSite Presentations: Henderson and MiamiPolice-Community CollaborationPeer-to-Peer NetworkingResearch and Coordinator RoundtablesClosing RemarksBoston Police Department Site Visit – HarborTour
Meeting Goals Dialogue with BJA leadership Hear from sites at various stages ofimplementation Receive and record (podcasts) site updates Focus on issues of sustainability, analysis,technology, and collaboration Focus on other core Smart Policing principles Focus on capacity assessments and TTA plans Build the Smart Policing community ofpractice5
Welcome from Bureau of JusticeAssistance Director Denise O’Donnell9:30 – 9:45 a.m.6This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Boston Police Department KeynoteCommissioner William Evans, Deputy Superintendent John M.Brown, Dr. Anthony Braga9:45 – 10:15 a.m.7This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
BreakPodcasts: Cambridge and Kansas City10:15 – 10:30 a.m.8This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
SPI Principles and PracticesCatherine McNamee and James “Chip” R. Coldren, Jr.10:30 – 11:15 a.m.9This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
SPI Site’s Engaging in SmartPolicing Principles and Practices 10Boston, MALowell, MAPhiladelphia, PALos Angeles, CA
Smart Policing Principles in Action Focus Innovation Research Partnership Technology Collaboration Sustainability11
Smart Policing InitiativeReducing violence in Kansas City:Past, Present, and Future12 12Chris Young - Operations SergeantRosilyn TempleKansas City Missouri PoliceDepartment, Violent CrimesEnforcement DivisionNo Violence Alliance OperationsPresident of Kansas CityMissouri Mothers InCharge
Kansas City, Missouri13
Kansas City, Missouri Demographics Population 464,310 59% White29% Black Metropolitan population 2.35 Million 315 Square miles, same land size as comparable cities ofAtlanta, St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Cincinnati combined(335). Atlanta 132 miles2Cincinnati 79 miles2Minneapolis 58 miles2St. Louis 66 miles2 Four counties: Jackson, Clay, Cass, Platte14
Kansas City Crime Historically one of the top 10 most violent cities in theUnited States Averages 106 Homicides per year Averages 3,484 Aggravated Assaults per year Crime typically contained within urban core 13 square miles of 315 account for 47 % of all homicides15
Smart Policing Initiative begins and then transforms In 2011, local stakeholders began to rethink how violent crimewas being addressed in Kansas City. They realized that somethinghad to be done differently. Stakeholders made the decision to apply for a grant from theBureau of Justice Assistance’s Smart Policing Initiative. Upon being awarded that grant, the Kansas City PoliceDepartment, in partnership with the University of MissouriKansas City, initiated a foot patrol project covering some of themost violent crime "hot spots" in the city.16
Smart Policing Initiative begins and then transforms In 2012, incumbents left the three offices of police chief, countyprosecutor, and mayor. With new officials in those key places, theground became fertile for attempting more ambitious andcollaborative initiatives for reducing violence. Those three officials, along with several others, formed theKansas City No Violence Alliance (KC NoVA) to plan and execute afocused deterrence strategy specifically to reduce group-relatedviolence. Although a positive move overall, that shift in leadershipand priorities caused the foot patrol project to lose traction. In 2013, the Smart Policing Initiative grant was shifted to focuseddeterrence. The foot patrol project involved the police and aresearch partner. KC NoVA, on the other hand, is a multiagency focused deterrence effort that has become theprimary strategy for addressing violent crime in Kansas City.17
Kansas City No ViolenceAlliance (KC NoVA) Established June of 2012 New mindset for Kansas City, MO - reduce violentcrime New agency heads “the perfect storm” 18KCPDProsecutors- Federal and StateATF needing violence reduction mantraNew mayorUMKC partnership developing“Focused Deterrence” chosen KCPD project manager selected
Kansas City Governing PartnersKCPDATFJACO & CityProsecutorsFBIUniversity ofMissouri - KansasCityCity of KansasCity19U.S. AttorneyMO Probation & Parole
The Goal of KC NoVA Reduce Homicides and Aggravated Assault20 2012 - 108 homicides2011 - 109 homicides 106.3 Annual Average3,484 Annual Averagefor Aggravated Assaults
“Smarter Policing” KC NoVA draws upon the strengths of the community, academicpartners, and the criminal justice system to identify the networksmost likely to be involved in violent crime. Dedicates the finite amount of resources to the very smallpercentage of individuals in Kansas City that cause the mostproblems.21
The implementationprocess begins,Fall 2012Build IntelligenceBuild intelligence models and relationships to direct the finite resources of thePD to the core group of individuals involved in, or likely to become involved in,violent crime.Build RelationshipsBuild relationships in the community to establish a moral voice that impactsviolence.Establish a StructureEstablish a structure of outreach to those who want to change, and need thehelp to make change.22
KC NoVA - First Steps Dime block gangnetwork Developed by UMKC andDet. Cramblit Process took twomonths Silos of intelligence IT Barriers / CrystalReports Product deliveredDecember 201223
Problem SetsUsing official data and human intelligence tounderstand the problem24
Dime Block Intelligence 360 members in group 202 in largest connected group 60 currently were on probation / parole 32 pending cases were in Jackson County processes 126 members had active warrants 22 warrants were felony One killed in December 2012 shootout Four indictments for murder in group January 201225
Dime Block Betweenness Centrality (Warrant)26
Dime Block Betweenness Centrality(Probation & Parole)27
Demonstration Crackdown –Operation Clean Sweep January 2013 KC incurred 15homicides in first four weeks. Operation Clean Sweeporganized to introduce NoVAformally to the public, and thetargeted criminal element. Conducted January 28, 29,and 30, 201328
Demonstration Crack down –Operation Clean Sweep Enforcement arm includedover 125 KCPD, ATF, FBI, USMarshals, Postal Inspectors,Codes Enforcement 47 warrants cleared 15 new Federal, Statecharges filed 91 residences checkedor knock and talked29
Law Enforcement Resource Center Centralized Investigative Analysis combiningIntelligence, Crime, and Operational Analysis 35 Personnel Division Supporting a Kansas CityRegional Fusion Center, Real-Time Crime Center, andInvestigative Analysis Unit Mission of Reducing Violent Crimes through theinfusion of Technology into Intelligence-Led Policing30
Intelligence Analysts Trained March and April 2013 Two analysts trained by Dr. Fox, UMKC, in Social NetworkAnalysis Training funded by LISC (Local Initiative Support Cooperation) Analysts assigned to the newly formed LERC (LawEnforcement Resource Center) Immediately began streamlining intelligence developmentand showing value to investigative elements. Produced Impact 2013 Network This network contained “data” only from official sourcesand systems31
Impact 2013 Network starting point Suspects of all aggravated assaults and homicides for the past 2 years(2011 & 2012) Two relational steps using FIF’s – Aggravated Assault Reports All associates of violent suspects All associates of the associates of violent suspects Total number of individuals 2,16132
Impact 2013Five largest Group Optimized Layout33
The 514Five largest groups optimized layout Efforts to implementfocused deterrencemodel continue 121 identified throughcentrality measure forinvitation to call ins 80 of the 121 onProbation and Parole Area Commandestablished:1 Sergeant and6 officers34
April 17th NoVA’s first “Call-In” April 201335
SNA begins to grow, but the focuseddeterrence mission begins to creep KCPD ATF Operation Ink Guns 225 weapons purchased 61 Federal Indictments Largest Federal Sweep in KCHistoryRed Call InGreen ProbationBlue Call In & ProbationBlack Ineligible36
NoVA hits the reset button 2013 winding down Approaching 100 homicides Entire governing board, researchers, key staff travel to NYC totroubleshoot focused deterrence effort Good “official data and SNA” Horrible “group / gang data” New intel process for our group violence reduction strategybegins January 201437
Violent Crime Intelligence Squad Created 5 Detectives and 1 Sergeant Collect intelligence on violent groups and individuals. Partners with Violent Crime Enforcement Squad to addressviolent group problems before they arise. Provide intelligence to Patrol and Investigative Elements toprevent violence from occurring. Responsible for conducting quarterly group audits38
Group Audit Process Draw intelligence from “official” police reports; Suspects,Victims, Witnesses of Homicide / Agg Assault. Invite representatives from NoVA partners and KCPD Patroland Investigative Elements to a Group Audit Meeting(Quarterly) (about 70 people attend) Identify groups / gangs and their loose or structuredrelationships. Identify “beefs” and “alliances” between groups. Compile human and documented police intelligence of thoseinvolved in violence into one sociogram.39
September 2014 Group Audit 4 Results 57 department members. Line-level officers.66 violent groups identified.These groups had a total of 832 members.About the groups 47.5% of the groups were considered extremely violent 13% of the groups were considered highly organized40
Group Social StructuresDetermine social structure of all “groups” involved in violence.A group is any social structure of individuals connected byrelationships, and not necessarily designated as a “gang.”41
Group Audit Sociogram42
Group Audit Sociogram43
Group Audit Sociogram44
Group Audit Scoiogram45
LERC Capabilities – SNA - Crime Data Mapping46
The ApproachFocused Deterrence47
Group Interventions Conduct notifications via “call-in” to key individuals of allgroups putting them “on notice” that violence will not betolerated and has severe consequences to the first group thatcommits a murder. Offer Social Service support such as “life skills, substanceabuse, anger management, education, employmentpreparation etc.” Follow up with severe enforcement on first group thatcommits a murder utilizing the full strength of the NoVAcollaborative. Repeat group intervention process a minimum of four timesper year, each time educating the groups of the consequencesof violence, and what has happened to others who committedviolence before them.48
Selection for Call-In 66 groups identified through group audit 2 individuals selected from each group Consideration given to those holding “betweennesscentrality” Consideration given to individuals on Probation and Parole49
Kansas City’s Local Chapter ofMothers In Charge50
SuccessOutcomes, Processes, and Organizations51
Aggravated Assault Incidents in 012With Guns2013Without Guns2014
KC Monthly Homicides(Cumulative Per Month)# Homicides an758148Feb Mar Apr May June13 19 33 41 48818 25 36 4814 29 38 42 4717 22 30 36 4810 16 22 29 36Jul6059555841Aug Sep70 7971 8468 7968 8146 57Oct Nov Dec88 92 10287 103 11190 97 10688 93 10064 69 79
Kansas City HomicidesRate / 100K: 1950-201440.030.020.010.00.054
Process The number of field interview forms completed hasincreased by more than 35 percent. Creating this feedback process with patrol officersfacilitates street-level buy-in and creates betterintelligence, resulting in more efficient policing andeffective crime preventionDatacollectionFIF’s /ReportsSociogram55
Organization56
Expanding Partnershipwith entire MO DOC Custom Notification Teams Instead of waiting on quarterly Call-In’s, interrupt cycles ofviolence as intelligence is learned and shared. Partnering with Missouri Department of CorrectionsProbation and Parole Reentry Process and the Director ofAdult Institutions Custom Notifications Teams – NoVA Reentry Prison Visits Intelligence Sharing with Missouri DOC Inspector GeneralsOffice57
ChallengesSustaining the partnership Sustaining funding Much of the project is sustained by the organizations involved;however, some grants are essential for the social service aspects. Mission Creep Others want the partnership to help solve other problems. Staying innovative Is it possible the new approach will become the norm and be lesseffective? What else can be done to reduce violence further? Training new partners New people get involved all the time. How do we make surethey are up to speed?58
Future SNA application can expand to other crime types andother sources of data Crime types- Gun crimes, Property, Fraud Sources of data- NIBIN, phone records, financial records How can SNA be used, not just to assist investigations, butto inform strategies? How does enforcement change based on network structure? How can we use new/innovative tools to impact networks?59
Smart Policing InitiativeSupport, TTA, Resources SPI assisted us in creating an evidence-based, data-driven,focused deterrence strategy that allowed us to achieve thelowest homicide rate in Kansas City’s history since 1972. SPI’s flexibility allowed for adjustments in our strategies whichultimately transitioned into the NoVA Project. SPI provided support that assisted with driving our strategiesthat made our NoVA Project more effective. The Bureau of Justice SPI Technical Training and Assistance putus back on track and provided course correction.60
QUESTIONS?61
LunchU.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz12:15 – 1:00 p.m.62This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Sustainability Practices in SPICambridge SPI, Lowell SPI, Philadelphia SPI, Mike White (facilitator)1:00 – 2:15 p.m.63This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-DP-BX-K006 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component ofthe Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do notnecessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Agenda Sustainability of Smart Policing Sustainability Efforts of SPI Sites– Cambridge, MA– Lowell, MA– Philadelphia, PA Closing Thoughts & Best Practices forSustainability64
What is Sustainability? Sustainability addresses:– Embedding change so that it survives over time– Continuing to produce desired or better thanexpected outcomes Presumes that the change has producedbenefits and that it is worth the effort tomaintain*From Nola Joyce’s webinar: ing-smartpolicing-webinar65
Sustainability is a Founding Principle inSmart Policing Sustainability:– Is stressed early on– Comes through deliberate, strategicplanning– Requires buy-in from all levels of the agency– Becomes less difficult when you have support fromexternal stakeholders (e.g., community).Keep in Mind: Some things are not worthsustaining. SPI tests new ideas.66
Two Approaches
Bureau of Justice Assistance’s Smart Policing Initiative. Upon being awarded that grant, the Kansas City Police Department, in partnership with the University of Missouri - Kansas City, initiated a foot patrol project covering some of the most violent crime "hot spots" in the city. Smart Policing Initiative . begins and then transforms
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
about community policing from a few decades of learning, research, and implementation efforts. It then examines the community policing components of Measure Y and the extent to which they are aligned with these best practices. In short, how do the community policing elements, as articulated in the 2004File Size: 401KBPage Count: 17Explore furtherAWARD-WINNING COMMUNITY POLICING STRATEGIEScops.usdoj.govExamples of Community Policing Strategies at Workwww.ravemobilesafety.comCommunity Oriented Policing Services USAGovwww.usa.govProblem-Solving and Community Policing: Crime and Justice .www.journals.uchicago.eduCommunity Policing: Much More Than Walking a Beatcops.usdoj.govRecommended to you b
their potential meaning for the future of law enforcement. These included Community Policing, Broken Windows Policing, Problem-oriented Policing, Pulling Levers Policing, Third Party Policing, Hot Spots Policing, Compstat, and Evidence-based Policing. In a luncheon presentation on day one of the workshop, participants heard from Prof.
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được
