Regulatory Quality And Competitiveness In Recent European .

3y ago
41 Views
2 Downloads
1.18 MB
27 Pages
Last View : 4d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Maleah Dent
Transcription

Regulatory Quality and Competitivenessin Recent European Union Member StatesBy Ferran BrunetUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaPresentation of the paper prepared for the Conference“Europeanisation after EU accession:Transformation, reform and compliance in recent EU member states”,organized by "L'Europe en formation. Revue d'études sur la construction européenne et lefédéralisme", Nice, 23rd and 24th March 2012

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20122

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS Contents of the full paper0. Abstract & 1. Introduction2. Economy, Society, and Policy: Analyzing the Regulatory Quality (RQ)3. The RQ in the Recent European Union (EU) Member States (MS)4. The Governance Quality (GQ) in the Recent EU MS5. The Recent EU MS Competitiveness (CP)6. The Performance of the Recent EU MS: European Deficits,Euroimbalances and the Euro Crisis7. Conclusion: The Recent EU MS Deficits of RQ, GQ and CP and theNeed for Stabilization, for Structural Reforms and for Europe –The State‐builder Task of the EUF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20123

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 0. Abstract & 1. IntroductionIn this paper we consider: i) the regulatory quality among the Recent EU MS,its components, dynamics and gaps; ii) the links found between regulatoryquality and productivity, competitiveness and performance; and iii) theimpact on the regulatory quality of the European multilevel economicgovernance system currently under construction.Despite the integration process, the Europeanization of economic formsremains somewhat limited. With the crisis and debt, euro and bankingdifficulties the regulatory gaps have exacerbated the euroimbalances and theeconomic divergences. For many European countries and regions, andespecially for recent EU MS, the Union appears to be an anchor for theempowerment of democracy, rule of law and competition, and a guaranteefor minimum quality standards and the limitation of interventionism. The EUis doing a key state‐building task. Thus, there is a pressing need for Europe.Keywords: Regulatory Quality; Competitiveness; Economic Policy; Governance; EuropeJEL F15, K83, L51. Paper length: 11,330 wordsF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20124

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 2. Economy, Society, and Policy: Analyzing the Regulatory Quality2.1. The Regulatory QualityThe subject of this research is the regulatory quality in the EU MS and itsrelations with governance quality and with competitiveness.Regulatory Quality, Governance Quality and Competitiveness (Fig. 1) 3 Spheres. EP conclusion: The RQ and other Deficits are Sources of Growth.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20125

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSThis research has developed three aims and has analyzed three kinds of sources: Elaborating empirical Data on RQ, GQ and CP furnished mainly by the WB (2011,2004‐2012a and 2012b: reports on Doing Business and onevidence gatheredWorldwide Governance), the Bertelsman Stiftung (2011), thefrom the MS aboutOECD (2012a and 2012c: Regulation data base), and the WEFRQ, GQ and CP(2004‐2012: Competitiveness reports). Contrasting the Analyses of the EU economy such as those by Martin Neilabove results with theBaily and Jacob Funk Kirkegaard (2004), Alberto Alesina andFrancesco Giavazzi (2006 and 2010), the EuropeanEuropean economicCommission‐DG ECFIN (2010 and 2012), and Hans‐Wernerconstitution and theSinn and Timo Wollmershaeuser (2011).common policies Discussing the Elaborations on the regulatory quality from sourcestendencies of and thesuch as Claudio M. Radaelli and Fabrizio De Francesco (2007),Susana Borrás and Radaelli (2010), Alesina et alii. (2010) andprospects for theseBrunet (2011a).elements all togetherF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20126

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS2.2. The Dynamics of the Regulatory Quality in the Recent EU MS (Fig. 2)Note to all the figures of this presentation.‐ Source: Author elaboration on data from the sources shown at the full paper and for 2012 or closest if other year(s) are not mentioned. 4 Phases: 1995‐2000: high growth, 2000‐2005: growth, 2005‐2010: stability, 2010‐2012: decrease. Convergence.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20127

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSDynamics of the Regulatory Quality and Competitiveness in the Recent EU MS (Tab. 1) QR: Best. GC: Limited Progress.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 2012 CP: Decrease.8

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS2.3. RQ, GQ and CP in Old EU MS (Fig. 4) Old EU MS: Higher Index for GQ and for Smallest Countries.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 20129

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS2.3. RQ, GQ and CP in Recent EU MS (Fig. 4) Recent EU MS: Higher Index for RQ ; Worse Index for CP.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201210

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS2.3. RQ, GQ and CP in EU Neighbor Countries (Fig. 4) Neighbors: The Candidates and the Potential Candidates have a Long Way to Go.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201211

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 3. The Regulatory Quality in the Recent EU MS3.1. Elements of the QR in the EUMS Business Environment Economic Freedom (Heritage Foundation‐Wall Street Journal‐Down Jones) Ease of Doing Business (WB):1‐10 Overall: Doing Business Index1. Starting a Business.2. Dealing with Construction Permits.3. Employing Workers.4. Registering Property.5. Getting Credit.6. Protecting Investors.7. Paying Taxes.8. Trading Across Borders.9. Enforcing Contracts.10. Closing a Business.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201212

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSRegulatory Quality and Business Environment (Fig. 5) Red Line: Overall. Best Eur.: Nordic, UK. Worse Eur.: Greece, Italy, Poland, Romania. Small‐New‐Independent‐Recent Accessed: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania: good.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201213

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS3.2. The Most Problematic Factors for DBThe Most Problematic Factors for Doing Business (Fig. 6)PER EACH MS : Program ofEP. Latvia, Polandand Romania:Better on Labour. General: Tax ‐regulations & rates. Great Concernson Qualities ofGovernment:Stability,Bureaucracy,Efficiency andCorruption: EvenSlovakia and CzechR. Inflation &Banking: Estonia,Latvia, Hungary.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201214

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 4. The Governance Quality in the Recent EU MS4.1. Political and Governance Stances Economist Intelligence Unit – Legatum Prosperity – Bertelsman Stiftung Freedom House – Heritage Foundation‐WSJ‐DJ Governance (WB)1‐6. Overall Governance Quality.1. Voice & Accountability.2. Political Stability and Absence of Violence.3. Government Effectiveness.4. Regulatory Quality.5. Rule of Law.6. Control of Corruption.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201215

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS4.2.The Quality of Governance in a Recent EU MSFrom Political Stability to the Rule of Law (Fig. 7) BESTMT, CY, EstoniaWORSE BG, RO, SKF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201216

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 5. The EU MS Competitiveness5.1. The CP World Economic Forum‐Davos – competitive industry Pillars1‐12 Overall: Global Competitiveness Index.1. Institutions.2. Infrastructure.3. Macroeconomic Stability.4. Health and Primary Education.5. Higher Education and Training.6. Goods Market Efficiency.7. Labour Market Efficiency.8. Financial Market Sophistication.9. Technological Readiness.10. Market Size.11. Business Sophistication.12. Innovation.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201217

5.2. The Elements for Competitiveness in the Recent EU MS (Fig. 8) Better: 4.Health ‐ 9.Tech.Readiness ‐ 3.Macroec.Stability. Worse: 1.Institutions ‐ 7.Labor Market ‐ 6.Goods Market Efficiency.

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 6. The Performance of the EU MS: European Deficits, Euroimbalancesand Euro Crisis6.1. The European Models: Structure vs. PolicyRQ, GQ and Competition vs. Competitiveness in the EU MS (Fig. 9)Panel A. Regulatory Qualityand Competitiveness Clear between RQ and CP.Panel B. Governance Qualityand Competitiveness Highest correlation between GQ and CP.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 2012Panel C. Competition Qualityand CompetitivenessSome small MS arecompetitive despite limitedCompetition Quality.19

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSRegulatory Quality vs. Economic and Social Performance in the EU MS (Fig. 10)Panel C. Regulatory Qualityand Standard of LivingPanel A. Regulatory Qualityand Foreign BalancePanel B. Economic Liberalizationand Social Inclusion The dispersion on HDI is All MS with Foreign The Highest Correlation.lower than for otherSurplus have high RQ.indicators.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201220

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS6.2. The EuroimbalancesThe European Deficits: Deficit of Employment. Deficit of Productivity. Deficit of Regulatory Quality. Deficit of Governance Quality. Deficit of Competitiveness. Deficit of Performance.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201221

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSThe Recent EU MS Economic Deficits (Tab. 4) The Largest Recent EU MS: Regulatory Deficit & Competition & Competitiveness Deficits.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201222

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSThe EU MS Imbalances(Fig. 11) The Triplet European Skyline. See Foreign Surplus Countries: Lower Unemployment and Public Deficit (except Latvia).F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201223

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MS 7. ConclusionsThe Deficits of the Recent EU MS on RQ, GQ and CPThe Need for Stabilization, Structural Reforms and for EuropeThe State‐builder Task of the EUA. On RQ and CP In a global world where factors and technology move, intangibles aseconomic regulation are the key for competitiveness, growth anddevelopment. Dynamics of Economic Freedom: Elements of Business Environment,Factors More Problematic for DB. EU Quality of Governance: Dynamics and Elements, from Representation toCorruption. EU Competitiveness: Dynamics and Elements. The Links between QR, QG and CP. EU Countries: Models, Structures and Policies. Convergence & Divergence.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201224

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSB. On Economic Policy The EU MS Deficits are the basement for the Economic Policy Programs. Economic Policy: Converting the Gaps‐Deficits on Employment,Productivity, QR, QG, CP and Performance in Sources‐Opportunities forGrowth. Structural Reforms: Profiting from the Improvement on the RQ. Wellbeing relates to economic freedom, to political freedom and to thequality of institutions.C. The Need for Stabilization, for Structural Reforms and forEurope Euro and Financial Crisis: Need for Stabilization. Deficits on Competitiveness and other: Need for Structural Reforms. The EU as an Anchor The EU as a Torpedo.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201225

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSD. The EU as State‐builder The New Independent Small Recent EU MS.The EU Added Value.The European Tendency to Over‐regulation.The European Sin – Less is Better.Avoiding Over‐regulation For a Smart Multilevel Governance System.The State‐building Task of the EU.F. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201226

Regulatory Quality in Recent EU MSThank You Very Muchfor Your Kind Attention!Prof. Dr. Ferran BrunetDepartment of Applied Economics – Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona University Campus, Building B, Office B3‐0098, ES‐08193 Bellaterra, Spain 34‐93‐581‐4580. ferran.brunet@uab.esF. Brunet – Conférence Europe en formation – 23‐24 mars 201227

Economy, Society, and Policy: Analyzing the Regulatory Quality 2.1. The Regulatory Quality The subject of this research is the regulatory quality in the EU MS and its relations with governance quality and with competitiveness. Regulatory Quality, Governance Quality and Competitiveness (Fig. 1)

Related Documents:

A formal Regulatory Management System [RMS] can help with: reduction of regulatory burden on citizens and firms improvement of regulatory quality identification of best choice of policy options Comprised of four elements: 1. regulatory quality tools 2. regulatory processes 3. regulatory institutions 4. regulatory policies 16

Competitiveness in context - Essay Competitiveness and disparities The analysis of the relationship between competitiveness and inequalities adds an additional level of complexity to the debate. The ambiguity in defining competitiveness in sections of the literature, for example, makes it difficult to shed light on the linkages. In the European .

Therefore, this paper is focusing on the analysis of competitiveness of state (territory), not business or market competitiveness. For analysing the factors of competitiveness this paper evaluates main sources of competitiveness according to M. Porter's Diamond Model, two the most important competitiveness researches -

perceived environmental competitiveness in both the classroom and the workplace. Trait competitiveness is a dispositional construct, whereas perceived environmental competitiveness is a situation-specific construct that emerges upon encountering a particular context and the people within it. Persons bring trait competitiveness with them to each new

The National Competitiveness Council's mandated focus is on competitiveness and productivity, and through this lens the Council's earlier publication, Ireland's Competitiveness Scorecard 2020, identified four broad challenges that need to be addressed to put the economy on a sound footing. In this report, the Council makes Competitiveness

competitiveness of a certain number of services. Competitiveness Advisory Group 3ppointcd by President S:.mtcr The first report of the Group took a broad view of competitiveness, stressing that competitiveness implies clements of productivity, efficiency and profitability, and that it is not an end in itself.

Competitiveness Index 4.0 (GCI 4.0), which measures the set of institutions, policies and factors that determine an economy's level of productivity. Because of shared foundations of competitiveness, there is a clear relationship between T&T and general competitiveness. Consequently, pursuing T&T competitiveness through such foundations

300-a02 abp enterprise sdn bhd. 7th floor menara lien hee no, 8 jalan tangung, 47700 petaling jaya. selangor p. j john c.o.d. 03-7804448 03-7804444 300-c01 control manufacturing 400-2 (tingkat satu) batu 1/2, jalan pahang, 51000 kuala lumpur kl lal net 60 days 03-6632599 03-6632588