29R-03: Forensic Schedule Analysis - AACE International
E29R03SAMPLFORENSICSCHEDULEANALYSIS
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 29R-03EFORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSISTCM Framework: 6.4 – Forensic Performance AssessmentPLRev. April 25, 2011Note: As AACE International Recommended Practices evolve over time, please refer to www.aacei.org for the latestrevisions.MContributors:Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the authors and contributors to this recommended practiceare their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers, unless otherwise stated.SA(April 25, 2011 Revision)Kenji P. Hoshino, CFCC PSP (Author)John C. Livengood, CFCC PSP (Author)Christopher W. Carson, PSP (Author)Andrew Avalon, PE PSPMichael S. Dennis, CCCRob Hartley, PSPRichard J. Long, PEJ. Scott Lowe, PERobert B. McCullough, PE CCE CFCCDonald F. McDonald, Jr., PE CCE PSPMark F. Nagata, PSPJeffery L. Ottesen, PE CFCC PSPThomas F. Peters, PE CFCCDr. Fredric L. Plotnick, PEDr. Anamaria I. Popescu, PE PSPMark C. Sanders, PE CCE PSPL. Lee Schumacher, PE PSPMichael D. TarulloJeffrey M. WentzRonald M. Winter, PSPJ. Kimon Yiasemides, PSPJames G. Zack, Jr., CFCCRichard J. LongMark F. Nagata, PSPJeffery L. Ottesen, PE CFCC PSPThomas F. Peters, PE CFCCDr. Anamaria I. Popescu, PEJose F. Ramirez, CCEMark C. Sanders, PE CCE PSPL. Lee Schumacher, PSPStephen P. Warhoe, PE CCE CFCCRonald M. Winter, PSPJames G. Zack, Jr. CFCCJohn C. Livengood, CFCC PSPMark F. Nagata, PSPJeffery L. Ottesen, PE CFCC PSPThomas F. Peters, PE CFCCKeith PickavanceDr. Anamaria I. Popescu, PEJose F. Ramirez, CCEMark C. Sanders, PE CCE PSPTakuzo SatoL. Lee Schumacher, PSPRobert Seals, PSPRonald M. Winter, PSPJames G. Zack, Jr. CFCC(June 23, 2009 Revision)Kenji P. Hoshino, CFCC PSP (Author)Andrew Avalon, PE PSPChristopher W. Carson, PSPMichael S. Dennis, CCCSidney J. Hymes, CFCCJohn C. Livengood, CFCC PSP(June 25, 2007 Revision)Kenji P. Hoshino, CFCC PSP (Author)Robert B. Brown, PEJohn J. Ciccarelli, PE CCE PSPGordon R. Costa. CFCC PSPMichael S. Dennis, CCCEdward E. Douglas, III CCC PSPPhilip J. Farrocco, PEDr. Sidney J. Hymes, CFCCCopyright AACE InternationalAACE International Recommended Practices
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 29R-03FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSISTCM Framework: 6.4 – Forensic Performance AssessmentApril 25, 2011CONTENTS1. ORGANIZATION AND SCOPE . 91.1 Introduction . 91.2. Basic Premise and Assumptions . 101.3. Scope and Focus . 10SAMPLE1.4. Taxonomy and Nomenclature. . 11A. Layer 1: Timing . 131. Prospective . 132. Retrospective. 13B. Layer 2: Basic Methods. 131. Observational . 132. Modeled . 14C. Layer 3: Specific Methods. 141. Observational Methods . 14a. Static Logic Observation . 14b. Dynamic Logic Observation . 142. Modeled Methods . 14a. Additive Modeling . 14b. Subtractive Modeling . 15D. Layer 4: Basic Implementation . 151. Gross Mode or Periodic Mode . 152. Contemporaneous / As-Is or Contemporaneous / Split . 153. Modified or Recreated . 154. Single Base, Simulation or Multi-Base, Simulation . 16E. Layer 5: Specific Implementation . 161. Fixed Periods vs. Variable Periods / Grouped Periods . 162. Global (Insertion or Extraction) vs. Stepped (Insertion or Extraction). . 161.5. Underlying Fundamentals and General Principles. 17A. Underlying Fundamentals . 17B. General Principles. 171. Use CPM Calculations . 172. Concept of Data Date Must be Used . 173. Shared Ownership of Network Float . 174. Update Float Preferred Over Baseline Float . 185. Sub-Network Float Values . 186. Delay Must Affect the Critical Path . 187. All Available Schedules Must Be Considered. 182. SOURCE VALIDATION . 18Copyright AACE InternationalAACE International Recommended Practices
29R-03: Forensic Schedule Analysis2 of 136April 25, 20112.1. Baseline Schedule Selection, Validation, and Rectification (SVP 2.1) . 19A. General Considerations . 19B. Recommended Protocol . 19C. Recommended Enhanced Protocol . 20D. Special Procedures . 211. Summarization of Schedule Activities . 212. Reconstruction of a Computerized CPM Model from a Hardcopy . 213. De-Statusing a Progressed Schedule to Create a Baseline . 224. Software Format Conversions . 22PLE2.2. As-Built Schedule Sources, Reconstruction, and Validation (SVP 2.2) . 23A. General Considerations . 23B. Recommended Protocol . 24C. Recommended Enhanced Protocol . 25D. Special Procedures . 251. Creating an Independent As-Built from Scratch “Daily Specific As-Built” (DSAB) . 252. Creating a Fully Progressed Baseline . 273. Determination of ‘Significant’ Activities for Inclusion in an As-Built . 274. Collapsible As-Built CPM Schedule . 285. Summarization of Schedule Activities . 28SAM2.3. Schedule Updates: Validation, Rectification, and Reconstruction (SVP 2.3) . 28A. General Considerations . 28B. Recommended Protocol . 29C. Recommended Enhanced Protocol . 29D. Special Procedures . 291. Reconstructed Updates . 29a. “Hindsight” Method . 30b. “Blindsight” Method . 302. Bifurcation: Creating a Progress-Only Half-Step Update . 303. Correcting the Contemporaneous Project Schedule for the Analysis . 302.4. Identification and Quantification of Discrete Delay Events and Issues (SVP 2.4) . 32A. General Considerations . 321. ‘Delay’ Defined . 33a. Activity-Level Variance (ALV) . 33b. Distinguishing ALV from Project-Level Variance (PLV) . 34c. Distinguishing Delay-Cause from Delay-Effect . 34d. Delay Characterization is Independent of Responsibility . 342. Identifying and Collecting Delays . 34a. Two Main Approaches to Identification and Collection . 34b. Criticality of the Delay . 353. Quantification of Delay Durations and Activity Level Variances . 35a. Variance Method . 35b. Independent Method . 354. Cause of Variance . 365. Assigning or Assuming Variance Responsibility . 36a. Contractor Delay . 36b. Owner Delay . 37c. Force Majeure Delay. 37Copyright AACE InternationalAACE International Recommended Practices
29R-03: Forensic Schedule Analysis3 of 136April 25, 2011B. Recommended Protocol . 37C. Recommended Enhanced Protocol . 38D. Special Procedures . 381. Duration and Lag Variance Analysis . 383. METHOD IMPLEMENTATION . 38PLE3.1. Observational / Static / Gross (MIP 3.1) . 39A. Description . 39B. Common Names . 39C. Recommended Source Validation Protocols . 40D. Enhanced Source Validation Protocols . 40E. Minimum Recommended Implementation Protocols . 40F. Enhanced Implementation Protocols . 411. Daily Delay Measure . 41G. Identification of Critical and Near-Critical Paths . 42H. Identification and Quantification of Concurrent Delays and Pacing . 43I. Determination and Quantification of Excusable and Compensable Delay . 431. Excusable and Compensable Delay (ECD) . 432. Excusable and Non-Compensable Delay (END) . 43J. Identification and Quantification of Mitigation / Constructive Acceleration. 44K. Specific Implementation Procedures and Enhancements . 44L. Summary of Considerations in Using the Minimum Protocol. 44M. Caveats in Using the Minimum Protocol / Conditions Requiring Enhanced Protocols . 44SAM3.2. Observational / Static / Periodic (MIP 3.2) . 45A. Description . 45B. Common Names . 46C. Recommended Source Validation Protocols . 46D. Enhanced Source Validation Protocols . 46E. Minimum Recommended Implementation Protocols . 46F. Enhanced Implementation Protocols . 481. Daily Delay Measure . 48G. Identification of Critical and Near-Critical Paths . 49H. Identification and Quantification of Concurrent Delays and Pacing . 49I. Determination and Quantification of Excusable and Compensable Delay . 501.
Forensic Schedule Analysis. Forensic.[9]
SIG SAUER AUTO PISTOLS P238 2.70 “ 2 232 P32 P230, P232 3.60 “ 232 232 232 232 P32 1 1 1 1 1 P239 3.60 “ 696 239 239 C40 G30 2 2 3 3 3 3 P225 3.86 “ 92F 229 226 26R 229 229 2 2 3 3 3 3 P228 3.86 “ 228 229 228 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 P229 3.86 “ 29R 26R U40 U40 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 P229 w/equipment rail 3.86 “ 29R 29R 29R 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 P229 DAK w .
2011 AACE INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS CDR.493.4 Introduction This paper is the second in a series that presents a Forensic Schedule Analysis (FSA) example implementation, prepared to address the application of procedures described in Recommended Practice 29R-03—Forensic Schedule Analysis
Forensic Science is the integration of core scientific disciplines. Forensic science involves a variety of careers. 1. Students will recognize the major contributors to the development of Forensic . Worksheets Lab; Activity Project assessments Research activities such as “famous forensic scientists and their contributions” or “careers inFile Size: 444KBPage Count: 21People also search forforensic science for high school textbook pdfdo forensic criminologist investigate the cri forensic criminology bookswhat is a dental hygienisthow to check fingerprint forensic criminologyare dental hygienists and dentist same thing
forensic science discipline (or equivalent). Experience It is essential that the post holder is an experienced forensic scientist in forensic drug analysis, forensic toxicology and preferably in forensic criminalistics, with a minimum of 10 years performing multi-disciplined forensic
Forensic science is the application of science to law. Any science can be applied into a legal situation, but some of the commonest forensic sciences include forensic biology, forensic chemistry, and forensic toxicology. The word forensic in today’s world simply
Forensic Psychology Chapter ObjeCtives ·orensic Define f psychology. · Review career areas in the forensic sciences. · Distinguish forensic psychology from forensic psychiatry. · Identify and describe the major subareas of forensic psychology. · Review the educational, training, and certification requirements to become a forensic psychologist.
Delivering forensic services (Report 21: 2018-19) 4 . Summary of audit findings . Delivering forensic services . We audited four types of forensic services: fingerprints, deoxyribonucleic acid(DNA), forensic medical examinations and illicit drugs. Three of these services accounted for approximately 92 per cent of all forensic services .
Andreas Wagner, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany MIT Symposium - May 6, 2013 Andreas Wagner with acknowledgement to all contributions of researchers from the different universities and research institutions involved in the research programs to be presented here . Content German research programs on building energy efficiency Innovative building technologies and performance of .
