Suees Nw D.C.
Carol A. PlummerPo Box 34ookala,HI 96774chairman Michael K PowellFederal communications Gunmission445 12th suees NwWashmgton. D.C.20554Dear Chairman Michael K Powell:As a broadcast television viewer and c o m m a of elecuonics and computer products. I urge the FederalCommunicationscommission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am ouuaged that the FCCwould consider a regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The broadcavt flag is neithtx in my interest nor the public's interest It will prevent IW fiom w a t c h q digitalbroadcast television in the ways I currently enjoy analog broadcast television-for example, it will remict myability to move the video I have rmrded for personal viewing tomrcan-to-rmm a d placeto-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofsofiware on a plane or rain. or to send a television clip of a high school f m t b d game to family and friiends.Furthermore, if computers cannot b l y receive digital television, how can I expect creative developen todiscover new devices that enable me to use content in exciways 1 haven't even thought of! I value.innovative devices like TiVo, ReplayW and the Wdow Media Center PC, which exist today because theywere built to open standards using inexpensive, ofFthe-shelf computer parts.Ifthe move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience mre enjoyable, flexible, andt ?prettierexciting, what compelliag reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital television e q u i p nApicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electronics and computerequipment. As a citizen and viewer of broadcast televisios I urge you to promote the digital televisiontransition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.Sincerely.Carol A. Plummer1
Angela Celeste Farr5110 Tomasita C tRaleigh NC 27616Chairman Michael K PowellFederal Communications Commission445 12th street.NwWashtngton. D.C. 20554Dearchairman Michael K Powell:of elecmmics and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Cammission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am ouEaged that the FCCwould consider a regulation would reshict the way I enjoy television.As a broadcast television viewer and cons-The broadcast flag is neitha in my interen nor the public's interest It will prevent me fiom watching digitalbroadcast television inthe ways I currently enjoy analog broadcast television-for example, it will restrict myability to move the video I have recorded for personal viewing from room--tMoom and placeto-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofs o h on a plane or uain. or to send a television clip of a high school football game to family and fiieuds.Fruthermore, if computers cannot fieely receive digital television, how can I expect creative developers todiscover new devices that enable me to use content in exciting ways I haven't even thought of? I valueinnovative devices Like TiVo. ReplayTV and the Windows Media Center PC, which exist today because theywere built to open standards using inexpensive, off-theshelf computer patts.If the move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible, andexciting, what compelling reason do 1 have as a consumer to buy new digital television equipment? A prettierpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electronics and computerequipment. As a citizen and viewer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digital televisiontransition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.sincerely,Angela Celeste Farr1I
2W3-1021 16 1835(QMT)18508181678 FromTuesday, October 21 2003Chairman Michael K Powell445 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20554VIA FACSIMILEDear Chairman Powell,As a consumer of broadcast television, electronics. and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am gravely concerned thata broadcast flag regulation would restrict the way I enjoy televisionThe digital television transition relies on convincing consumers of the benefits of switching to and buyingdigital television equipment That transition will be far more palatable to me as a consumer if switchingdoesn't mean discarding my existing home network, buying new high-resolution displays, and finding roomfor yet another device in my living room. Please do not allow the MPAA and its allies to hinder the transitionby making us buy special-purpose DTV devices that are more expensive and less valuableIn addition. I am very concerned about the fair-use implications of the broadcast flag. With today'stechnology, I can be more than a passive recipient of content -- I can modify, create, and participate I canrecord TV to watch later, clip a small piece of N and splice it into a home movie. send an email clip of mychild's football game to a distant relative; or record a TV program onto a DVD and play it at my friend'sapartment The broadcast flag seems designed to remove this control and flexibility that I enjoyIf the move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable. flexible, andexciting. what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital equipment? A prettier TVpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electronics and computerequipment. As a citizen and consumer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digital transition byopposing the broadcast flagSincerely,Stephen Patrick400 East Cloud StreetSalina. KS 67401
Andrea I. Quijada3 14 Valencia NEAlbuquerque. Nh4 87108Chairman Michael K PowellFederal Communications Commission445 12th street, NwWashington, D.C.20554Dear chairmanMichael K Powell:As a broadcast television viewer and wmumer of electronics and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commission to vote against the adoption of a "brcadcast flag." I am oueaged that the FCCwould consider a regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The broadcast flag is neither in my interest nor the public's interest It will prevent me from watching digitalbroadcast television in the.ways I currently enjoy analog broadcaa television-for example, it will restrict myability to move the video I have recoded for personal viewing from roonMMoom and place-tc-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofsoftware on a plane or rain, or to send a television clip of a high school football game to family and 6iends.F u n h m if, computers cannot k l y receive digital television, how can I expect creative developers todiscover new devices that enable me to use content in exciting ways I haven't even thought of? I valueinnovative devices like TiVo, ReplaylV and the Windows Media center PC. which exist today because theywere built to open standards using inexpensive, off-theshelf computer parts.Ifthe move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible, andexciting, what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital television e q u i p m t ? A pmtierpicture is hardy enough reason f o r m to dispense with all my current consumer elecmnics and computerequipment. As a citizen and viewer of broadcast television. I urge you to promote the digital televisiontransition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Andrea I. Quijada1
Melissa Click112 West Boulevard NorthColumbia, MO 65203Chairman Michael K PowellFederal Communications Commission445 12th SrnL NwWashington. D.C. 20554Dear Chairman Michael K Powell:As a broadcast television viewer and consumer of elecaanics and cnmputer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commissionto vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am outraged that the FCCwould consider a regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The broadcast flag is neither in my interest nor the public's interest It will prevent me f?omw a t c h g digitalbroadcast television in the ways I c m l y enjoy analog broadcast television-for example, it will restrict myability to move the video I have recorded for personal viewing f?omroom-to-room and place-to-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofsoftware on a plane or t r a h or to send a television clip of a high school football game to family and frimds.Furthermore, if computers carnot &ly receive digital television, how can I expect creative developers todiscover new devices that enable me to use content in exciting ways I haven't even thought of? I valueinnovative devices like TiVo, ReplaylV and the Windows Media Center PC. which exist today because theywere built to open standards using inexpensive, off-theshelf computer parts.If the move to digital television does not rnake the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible, andexciting, what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital television e q u i p m t ? A prenierpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer e l m n i c s and computerequipmxt. As a citizen and viewer of broadcast televisioq I urge you to promote the digital televisionm i t i o n by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Melissa Click
Tamar Goldenberg12LargoheLivingston, NJ 07039Chairman Michael K PowellFederal communications commission445 12th s*NwWashmgton, D.C. 20554Dearchairman Michael K Powell:As a broadcast television viewer and cotlsumer of elecnonics and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunicationsCommission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am outraged that the FCCwould d d e r a regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The broadcast flag is neither in my interest nor the public's interest It will prevent me from watching digitalbroadcast television in the ways I currently enjoy analog broadcast television-for example, it will resaict myability to move the video I have recorded for personal viewing from rmnrto-rmm a d place-to-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofsoftware on a plane oror to send a television clip of a high school fmtball game to family and friends.Furthermore, if computers cannot &ly receive digital television, how can I expect creative developers todiscover new devices that enable ne to use contenl in exciting ways I haven't even thought of?1v d u einnovative devices like TiVo. ReplayTV and the Wmdows Media center PC, which exist today because theywere built to open standards using inexpensive, o 5 t h e s h e l f computer parts.Ifthe move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible, andexiting, what compelliug reason do I have as a m u m a to buy new digital television equipment? A prettierpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electmnics and computerequipment. As a citizen and viewer of broadcast television, I urge you to pronmte the digital televisiontransition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Tamar Goldenberg1
Michalsommers6400 Wyoming Blvd NEABQ,NM 87 108Chainnan Michael K PowellFedeml communications Commission445 12th street N wWashington, D.C. 20554Dear chairmanMichael K Powell:As a teacher, broadcast televisian viewer and consof electronics and computer produrn, I urge theFederal Communications Commission to vote against the adoption of a "brcadcastflag." I am ouuaged thatthe FCC would consider a regulatian would resuict the way I use television as a teaching tool in the dassrmmatxi how I enjoy television personally.The broadcast flag is neither in my interest nor the public's interest It will prevent nu? fiam watching digitalbroadcast television in the ways I currently enjoy d o g broadcast televisian-for example, it will remict myability to move the video I have recorded for per onalviewing fiom rmm-to-rmm and place-tc-place.The broadcast flag will also lock out my computer as a way to watch my favorite shows using my choice ofsoftware on a plane or t r d or to send a televisian clip of a high school football game to family and friendsFurthermore, if computers cantlot k l y receive digital television how can I expect creative d e v e l o p todiscover new devices that enable me to use content in exciting ways I haven't even thought of? I valueinnovative devices Like TiVo, ReplayTV and the Wmbva Media Center PC, which exist today becausetheywere built to open standards using inexpensive, off-thesbelf computer parts.If the move to digtal television does not make the public's viewing experience mre enjoyable. flexible.exciting and beneficial for education, what compelling reason do I have as a c m m r to buy new digitaltelevisionequipmmt? A prettier picture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my currentCoIlSumer electronics and computer equipment, As a citizen and viewer of b r o a b s t television, I urge you topromote the digital television transition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Mchal Sommers1
Tuesday, October 21 2003Chairman Michael K. Powell445 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20554VIA FACSIMILEDear Chairman Powell,As a consumer of broadcast television, electronics, and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commlssion to vote against the adoptim of a 'broadcast flag." I am gravely cmcernedthat a broadcast flag regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The digital television transition relies on convincing consumers of the benefits of switching to and buyingdigital television equipment. That transition wlll be far more palatable to me as a consumer if switchingdoesn't mean discarding my existing home network, buying new high-resolution dlsplays, and flndinq roomfor yet another device in my living room. Please do not allow the MPAA and i t s allies to hinder thetransition by making us buy special-purpose DTV devices that are more expensive and less valuable.In addition, I am very concerned about the fair-use implications of the broadcast flag. With today'stechnology, I can be more than a passive recipient of content . I can modify, create, and participate. Ican record TV to watch later; cllp a small piece of TV and splice it Into a home movie; send an email clipof my child's football game to a distant relative; or record a TV program onto a DVD and play It a t myfriends apartment. The broadcast flag seems designed to remove this control and flexibility that I enjoy.If the move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible,and exciting, what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital equipment?A prettier TVpicture i s hardly enough reason for me to dispense with a l l my current consumer electronics andcomputer equipment. A s a citizen and consumer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digitaltransition by opposing the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Daniel Johnson110 Crosswind Dr.Shrewsbury, PA 17361
16508181678 FromTuesday, October 21 2003Chairman Michael K. Powell445 12th Street, M.yWashington, DC 20554VIA FACSIMILEDear Chairman Powell,As a consumer of broadcast television, electronics, and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag." I am gravely concerned thata broadcast flag regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The digital television transition relies on convincing consumers of the benefits of switching to and buyingdigital television equipment. That transition will be far more palatable to me as a consumer if switchingdoesn't mean discarding my existing home network, buying new high-resolution displays, and finding roomfor yet another device in my living room. Please do not allow the MPAA and its allies to hinder the transitionby making us buy special-purpose DTV devices that are more expensive and less valuable.In addition, I am very concerned about the fair-use implications of the broadcast flag. With today'stechnology, I can be more than a passive recipient of cnntent -- I can modify, create, and participate. I canrecord TV to watch later; clip a small piece of TV and splice it into a home movie; send an email clip of mychild's football game to a distant relative; or record a TV program onto a DVD and play it at my friendsapartment. The broadcast flag seems designed to remove this control and flexibility that I enjoy.If the move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible, andexciting. what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital equipment? A prettier TVpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electronics and computerequipment. As a citizen and consumer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digital transition byopposing the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Paul Traue, Jr.14506 Sunrose LaneDallas, Tx 75234
16508181679 FromTuesday, October 21 2003Chairman Michael K. Powell445 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20554VIA FACSIMILEDear Chairman Powell,AS a consumer of broadcast te1evision;electronics. and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commission to vote against the adoption of a "broadcast flag " I am gravely concerned thata broadcast flag regulation would restrict the way I enjoy televisionThe digital television transition relies on convincing consumers of the benefits of switching to and buyingdigital television equipment That transition will be far more palatable to me as a consumer if switchingdoesn't mean discarding my existing home network, buying new high-resolution displays, and finding roomfor yet another device in my living room Please do not allow the MPAA and its allies to hinder the transitionby making us buy special-purpose DTV devices that are more expensive and less valuableIn addition. I am very concerned about the fair-use implications of the broadcast flag With today'stechnology, I can be more than a passive recipient of content I can modify, create, and participate. I canrecord TV to watch later; clip a small piece of TV and splice it into a home movie. send an email clip of mychild's football game to a distant relative; or record a TV program onto a DVD and play it at my friend'sapartment The broadcast flag seems designed to remove this control and flexibility that I enjoy--If the move to digital television does not make the public's viewing experience more enjoyable, flexible. andexciting. what compelling reason do I have as a consumer to buy new digital equipment? A prettier TVpicture is hardly enough reason for me to dispense with all my current consumer electronics and Computerequipment As a citizen and consumer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digital transition byopposing the broadcast flag.Sincerely,Chris Vickroy203 Stonewall DrLeague City, TX 77573
18508181878 FromTuesday, October 2 1 2003Chairman Michael K. Powell445 12th Street, NWWashlngton, DC 20554VIA FACSIMILEDear Chairman Powell,As a consumer of broadcast television, electronics, and computer products, I urge the FederalCommunications Commission t o vote against t h e adoption o f a "broadcast flag." I am gravelyconcerned t h a t a broadcast flag regulation would restrict the way I enjoy television.The dlgltal television transitlon relles on convinclng consumers of t h e benefits o f swltching toand buying dlgital televlslon equipment. That transitlon will be far m o r e palatable t o m e as aconsumer If swltchlng doesn't mean dlscarding m y exlstlng home network, buylng new hlghresolution dlsplays, and flnding room for y e t another device in my living room. Please do n o tallow t h e MPAA and its allles t o
As a citizen and viewer of broadcast television, I urge you to promote the digital television transition by opposing adoption of the broadcast flag. sincerely, Angela Celeste Farr 1 I . 2W3-1021 16 1835(QMT) 18508181678 From Tuesday, October 21 2003 Chairman Michael K Powell
API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design TWENTY-SECOND EDITION NOVEMBER 2014 310 PAGES 395.00 PRODUCT NO. G2AWSD22 This recommended practice is based on global industry best practices and serves as a guide for those who are concerned with the design and construction of new fixed offshore platforms and for the .
Update to reflect user’s comments Version 2 1.3.16 Hugo den Boogert UEQ31 Update to reflect new developments and user’s comments Version 0 1.10.2018 Habsi, Haitham UEQ32 Revised entirely to SP (previously, it was PR-1708) iii Related Business Processes Code Business Process (EPBM 4.0) iv Related Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF) Documents The related CMF Documents can be retrieved from .
Automotive EMC Introduction and Overview. 14. Automotive System RF Emissions Vehicle systems can be responsible for onboard noise generation as a byproduct of vehicle operation. In the automotive industry, this noise has been classified into two categories: – Broadband (typically due to electrical arcing) » Referred to as “Arc and Spark” noise. – Narrowband (typically due to .
BEVERAGES. Si avvisa la gentile clientela che per qualsiasi informazione sulla presenza di sostanze che possono provocare allergie ed intolleranze è possibile consultare l’apposita documentazione che verrà fornita, a richiesta, dal personale in servizio. Per garantire la continua presenza del nostro prodotto, alcune materie prime potrebbero essere surgelate all’origine o congelate in .
Cold beverages Robinson Refresh’d The number one new product out of home in 2017 & continues to deliver value growth. 60% of UK consumers said they would like to see a healthier range of soft drinks on offer. This line contains less than 60 calories and is sweetened with naturally sourced stevia. Flavours available: Peach & Mango, Apple and Kiwi, Orange & Passionfruit Sobe V Water Health as .
The Garden Bridge Executive Summary 1. On 19 October, the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan formally appointed me to undertake a review of the Garden Bridge project. This review does not seek to assess whether building a Garden Bridge over the River Thames is a good idea; that is a matter for the Mayor, and I made clear at the start of this review process that I had no view. I have studied the .
Business model reporting (October 2017) was the first in this series, and it established that good business model disclosure provides the foundation for the strategic report as a whole, and in particular on how the company considers risk and viability. The second report in this series was Risk and viability reporting (November 2017), which examined the key attributes of principal risk and .
Calicut University P.O. Malappuram, Kerala, India 673 635 380. School of Distance Education Modern World History – IV Semester 2 UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDY MATERIAL Complementary Course BA- ENGLISH & POLITICAL SCIENCE IV Semester PART II – MODERN WORLD HISTORY Prepared & Scrutinized by: Dr. N Padmanabhan, Associate Professor , PG Department of History, C.A.S .
