Research Article Development And Validation Of RP-HPLC .

3y ago
10 Views
2 Downloads
1.39 MB
7 Pages
Last View : 5m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Harley Spears
Transcription

Hindawi Publishing CorporationISRN SpectroscopyVolume 2013, Article ID 572170, 6 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/572170Research ArticleDevelopment and Validation of RP-HPLC Methodfor Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium Quantitation inHuman Plasma by Solid Phase Extraction ProcedureParas P. Vekariya and Hitendra S. JoshiDepartment of Chemistry, Saurashtra University, Rajkot 36005, IndiaCorrespondence should be addressed to Hitendra S. Joshi; drhsjoshi49@gmail.comReceived 21 June 2013; Accepted 14 August 2013Academic Editors: I. P. Gerothanassis, B. Liu, and S. PandeyCopyright 2013 P. P. Vekariya and H. S. Joshi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.Simple and rapid reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed and validated usingsolid phase extraction (SPE) technique for the determination of Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium (AMP) in human plasma;detection was carried out by photo diode array detector. Chromatographic separation of the analyte AMP was achieved within7.5 min by Waters symmetry C18 (4.6 250 mm, 5 ๐œ‡m) column, mobile phase was 25 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5):acetonitrile 55 : 45 v/v, flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the detection was carried out at 254 nm. Calibration curve was linear (r2 0.9985) in the range of 1.0โ€“9.0 ๐œ‡g/mL, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.150 ๐œ‡g/mL and 0.400 ๐œ‡g/mL,respectively, and intra- and interday deviations were between 1.53โ€“8.41% and 1.78โ€“4.59%, respectively. The overall mean recoveryof AMP was 92.35%. No any endogenous constituents were found to interfere at retention time of the analyte. This new RP-HPLCmethod was successfully validated and may be applied to conduct bioavailability and bioequivalence studies of AMP.1. IntroductionAzilsartan Medoxomil Potassium is chemically namedas (5-Methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4yl) methyl 2-ethoxy-1-{[2 (5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl) te monopotassium salt(Figure 1). It is a white crystalline powder which is practicallyinsoluble in water, freely soluble in methanol, dimethylsulfoxide, and dimethylformamide, soluble in acetic acid, slightlysoluble in acetone, and acetonitrile and very slightly solublein tetrahydrofuran and 1-octanol [1].The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hasapproved Edarbi tablet (Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium)on February 25, 2011, to treat hypertension in adults. It isavailable in 80 mg and 40 mg dosages, with the recommendeddosage set at 80 mg once in a day [2].Angiotensin II hormone plays a vital role in activation ofrenin-angiotensin-aldosterone system as well as in regulationof blood pressure, fluid-electrolyte balance, and also in pathophysiology of hypertension. Activation of type 1 angiotensinreceptor which is a member of G protein coupled receptorefficiently controls the numerous effects of AII which arevasoconstriction, secretion of aldosterone and vasopressinand cellular proliferation. So blocking of AII receptor willalso block receptor-1, and it will lead to termination of thewhole course of action mentioned above; so AII blocker willbe helpful in the management of cardiovascular and renaldiseases as therapeutic agent [3].The active moiety of AMP is revealed by hydrolysis ofthe medoxomil ester and it converts into Azilsartan which isan active angiotensin II receptor blocker and more effectivein lowering blood pressure within 24 hours as compared tovalsartan and olmesartan [4โ€“6].The literature survey shows that there is only a singlemethod available for quantitation of Azilsartan MedoxomilPotassium and Chlorthalidone in pharmaceutical dosageform [7]. As per our findings, there is not any methodreported for quantitation of AMP in human plasma thus itis inevitable to develop such a sensitive, rapid, and accurate

2ISRN SpectroscopyOOO KO NNOO4.5, and 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL). All stock and working solutions werestored in refrigerator (at 2โ€“8 C) when not in use. The spikedplasma samples were prepared by adding 25 ๐œ‡L of respectivespiking stock solution in 475 ๐œ‡L of blank plasma.OH3 CNONCH3Figure 1: Chemical structure of lafutidine hydrochloride salt.method which could be used to investigate further bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.2. Experimental2.1. Materials and Reagents. Pharmacopoeial grade standardof Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium was gifted by AmiLifesciences Private Limited, Baroda. LC grade methanol waspurchased from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd., Baroda, the waterused was purified by milli-Q water assembly, analytical gradeammonium acetate was obtained from Spectrochem Pvt.Ltd., and solid phase extraction cartridges (Strata-X) werepurchased from Phenomenex.2.2. Instrumentation. The chromatographic system used toperform development and validation of this method wascomprised of an LC-10ATvp binary pump, an SPD-M10Avpphoto-diode array detector, and a Rheodyne manual injectormodel 7725i with 20 ๐œ‡L loop (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan),connected to a multi-instrument data acquisition and dataprocessing system (LC Solution, Shimadzu).2.3. Biological Samples. Human blank plasma samples for thedevelopment and validation of the method were obtainedfrom government recognise laboratory.2.4. Chromatographic Conditions. Chromatographic analysiswas performed on a reverse phase column purchased fromWaters, symmetry C18 (15 cm, 4.6 250 mm, 5 ๐œ‡m) part number WAT054275, serial number 022638193236. The mobilephase consisted of 25 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH5.5): methanol 55 : 45, v/v. The flow rate of the mobile phasewas adjusted to 1.0 mL/min, retention time of analyte was7.5 min, and the injection volume was 20 ๐œ‡L. Detection wasperformed at 254 nm.2.5. Preparation of Stock Solution and Spiked Plasma Samples.The stock solution of AMP was prepared in methanol atconcentration of 1.0 mg/mL. Working solution of 50 ๐œ‡g/mLwas prepared by appropriately diluting the stock solutionof AMP in methanol : water 50 : 50 v/v. Working solutionof AMP was used to prepare the spiking stock solution forpreparation of nine points of calibration curve (1โ€“9 ๐œ‡g/mL)and quality control samples at three concentration levels (1.5,2.6. Sample Preparation and Extraction Procedure. Extraction was performed by solid phase extraction procedurewhich is a very efficient technique, and the samples extractedby this procedure are untainted compared to those extractedby other techniques. Sample extracted by this method showsgood recovery results; so it was decided to conduct themethod validation by using SPE technique to achieve moreefficient data of bioavailability and equivalence studies.475 ๐œ‡L of plasma was spiked with 0.25 ๐œ‡L of respectiveQC and calibration standard in glass tube, mixed with 250 ๐œ‡Lof 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer, and vortexed thoroughlythen mixture was loaded into Strata-X cartridge which waspreconditioned by 2 mL methanol followed by 2 mL water;cartridge was washed by 1 mL water two times. Then cartridgewas transferred into clean test tube, the analyte was elutedin 1.0 mL methanol, and then 20 ๐œ‡L volume is injected intoHPLC system.2.7. Method Validation. The validation was executed as perโ€œGuidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validationโ€from the United States Food and Drug Administration [8].2.7.1. Selectivity. The selectivity of the method was performedto ensure absolute separation of AMP from the biologicalendogenous components of the human plasma. Selectivitywas carried out by analysing seven different lots of blankhuman plasma by solid phase extraction procedure givenabove.2.7.2. Linearity. Five standard curves of nine different concentration standards and two blank samples have beenassayed, but only nine concentration standards were includedin the calibration curve, whereas blank samples were used tocheck interference and contamination. Each calibration curveshould meet the following acceptance criteria: deviation atLLOQ level must be lower than 20% and not more than 15%deviation for the rest of the standards other than LLOQ.2.7.3. Precision and Accuracy. Interday and intraday precisionand accuracy were evaluated by five spiked samples atanalyzing three different concentrations of AMP (1.5, 4.5,and 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL). Within batch, precession and accuracy weredetermined by repeated analysis of five spiked samples ofAMP at each QC level. Intraday precession and accuracywere determined by repeated analysis of three consecutivedays (5 series per day). The concentration of each sample wasdetermined using standard curves prepared and analysed onthe same day.2.7.4. Matrix Effect. Matrix effect was evaluated by comparing peak areas of extracted samples using five differentlots of human plasma in triplicate at three concentrationlevel of analyte (1.5, 4.5, and 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL); percentage RSD

ISRN Spectroscopy3PDA multi 1PDA multi 131.0(mAU)0.5(mAU)AMP20.0 0.510 1.0 )(a)(b)Figure 2: HPLC-PDA chromatograms of blank plasma sample and LLOQ (1.0 ๐œ‡g/mL) standard (a); chromatogram of extracted blank plasma(b); Chromatogram of extracted LLOQ sample spiked with 1.0 ๐œ‡g/mL of calibration standard.AMPPDA maulti 1PDA multi 11.5AMP1.00.0(mAU)(mAU)0.5 0.50.50.0 0.5 1.0 5(min)(b)Figure 3: HPLC-PDA chromatogram of LOD and LOQ samples (a); Chromatogram of LOD sample (b); Chromatogram of LOQ sample.and accuracy were calculated to check interference of matrixeffect on the analyte concentration.2.7.5. Recovery. Percentage recovery of AMP was determinedby comparing the AMP peak area obtained from extractedplasma samples with aqueous sample of the same concentration standard. This procedure was followed for three differentconcentration levels of analyte 1.5, 4.5 and 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL.3. Results and DiscussionDuring method development stages, we found that theresults obtained by solid phase extraction method were muchbetter than those obtained by protein precipitation extraction(especially mean recovery of analyte), so it was decided toproceed with SPE.3.1. Sample Preparation. To accelerate drug dissociation ofanalyte from plasma, different buffers were tried, but with25 mM ammonium acetate (pH 5.5), recovery and responsewere found better; so it was added to plasma sample, andmethanol was used as eluent.3.2. Separation. Different mobile phases were investigated byusing methanol, acetonitrile, and ammonium acetate in various proportions; after several trials, mobile phase acetonitrile:25 mM ammonium acetate 45 : 55 v/v (pH 5.5) was finalised.Flow rate selection was based on peak parameters height,asymmetry, tailing, baseline drift, and run time. Flow rate wasset at 1.0 mL/min. The retention time for the investigated drugwas found at 7.5 min, and runtime was 15 min.Different columns have been tested, with minimal effecton the resolution of the analyte, and a Waters C18 columnhas been finalised because of its demonstrated smoothness and reproducibility in this method. Column-to-columnreproducibility was also evaluated; only slight variations inretention time were observed when injecting the sample oncolumn from different manufacturers and containing thesame brand of packing material.The optimum wavelength for detection of analyte was254 nm, at which much better detector response was

4ISRN SpectroscopyTable 1: Results of 5 calibration curves for AMP determination.Added conc.Back calculated conc. (๐œ‡g/mL)MeanMean 859.678.929.07100.813.83Table 2: Parameter corresponding to linear regression obtained from 5 calibration curves of AMP.Calibration 561723.6833456.634426.4918Correlation 0090.0895obtained. For the estimation of AMP, a sharp and symmetrical peak was obtained with good baseline, which assists theaccurate measurement of the peak area.for interday it was found to be 1.78โ€“4.59 and 99โ€“113%,respectively. The results revealed good precision and accuracy(Table 3).3.3. Assay Selectivity. Seven blank samples were assayedto examine selectivity of the method, and there was nointerference of endogenous peak observed at the retentiontime of AMP (Figure 2).3.7. Matrix Effect. Results of matrix effect are given inTable 4. Percentage of RSD and accuracy of the injectedsamples for LQC was 1.19โ€“7.54 and 99.66โ€“104.78%, forMQC 1.64โ€“2.58 and 103.16โ€“108.4%, and for HQC was3.43โ€“7.11 and 103.16โ€“106.46%, respectively. Results indicate that there is no considerable endogenous component from blank plasma interferes in the measurement ofanalyte.3.4. Linearity. Five calibration curves were assayed as mentioned in Section 2.5, and all of them met the acceptancecriteria with good regression (๐‘Ÿ2 0.9985). The linearityof the method was evaluated by a calibration curve in theconcentration range of 1โ€“9 ๐œ‡g/mL. Calibration curve wasdetermined by peak area versus concentration. Concentration of analyte was calculated by using mean calculationformula ๐‘Œ 30365๐‘ฅ 1723. Data of calibration curves isgiven in Tables 1 and 2.3.5. LOD and LOQ. Limit of detection and limit of quantification (LOD and LOQ) were estimated in accordancewith the baseline to noise ratio; it should be 3 and 10 timeshigher than the blank plasma sample, respectively. LOD andLOQ were estimated to be 0.150 ๐œ‡g/mL and 0.400 ๐œ‡g/mL,respectively; a representative chromatogram of LOD andLOQ is given in Figure 3.3.6. Precision and Accuracy. RSD and accuracy of intradayprecision were in the range 1.53โ€“8.41% and 102โ€“105%, while3.8. Extraction Recovery. The extraction recovery determined for AMP was shown to be consistent, precise, andreproducible. As per result given in Table 5, mean recoveriesof the three concentration levels (1.5, 4.5, and 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL)were 93.69, 91.57, and 91.64%, respectively, whereas the meanrecovery between QC level is 92.35%.3.9. Stability. Table 6 summarizes stability experimentswhich are the bench top 24 hour at room temperature, postextraction (at 4โ€“8 C after extraction), freeze thaw stability(three cycle), long-term stability for 30 days (stored at 20 C), and post preparative stability data of AMP. All theresults showed the stability behaviour during these tests andno stability-related problems occurred during the validationand stability testing. The stability of working solutions was

ISRN Spectroscopy5Table 3: Intra- and interday precision and accuracy of the method for determination of AMP at three levels of quality control samples.Added conc. ed conc.a1.53 ( 0.02)4.61 ( 0.17)8.41 ( 0.33)Detected conc.a1.49 ( 0.02)5.08 ( 0.23)8.11 ( 593.94Accuracy%99.98113.03101.27Mean( SD, ๐œ‡g/mL); intraday ๐‘› 5and interday ๐‘› 5 series per day.Table 4: Results of matrix effect analysing 5 different lots of blank human plasma at three different levels of quality control samples.LOTA-1A-2A-3A-4A-5aMeana1.54 ( 0.07 )1.56 ( 0.04)1.49 ( 0.02)1.52 ( 0.05)1.57 ( 0.12)1.5 ๐œ‡g/mLRSD%4.482.631.193.207.54Meana4.64 ( 0.08)4.86 ( 0.07)4.72 ( 0.10)4.75 ( 0.08)4.72 ( .1108.0105.0105.7105.0Meana8.29 ( 0.28)8.35 ( 0.45)8.37 ( 0.59)8.51 ( 0.45)8.49 ( 0.30)8.0 4103.1106.4106.1( SD, ๐œ‡g/mL).Table 5: Absolute recovery of AMP from 0.5 mL of plasma at threedifferent levels of quality control samples.1.5 ๐œ‡g/mL 4.5 ๐œ‡g/mL 8.0 ๐œ‡g/mL% Mean recovery within QC level 93.69% Mean recovery between QClevelSD% CV91.5791.6492.351.311.35Table 6: Stability data of AMP at three levels of quality controlstandard samples.1.5 ๐œ‡g/mLAccuracyaBench top98.51 ( 1.83)Process98.12 ( 2.78)Freeze and thaw 102.47 ( 4.33)Long term99.75 ( 2.59)a4.5 ๐œ‡g/mLRSD%1.921.642.231.802.584.5 ๐œ‡g/mLAccuracya104.71 ( 3.47)103.37 ( 4.24)101.94 ( 2.62)104.34 ( 4.19)8.0 ๐œ‡g/mLAccuracya101.2 ( 1.45)101.49 ( 0.67)98.94 ( 1.68)101.75 ( 1.65)Mean ( SD).tested, and on the basis of the results obtained these solutionswere at least stable for 6 h.4. ConclusionWe have developed a suitable method for the determinationof Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium in human plasma bysolid phase extraction procedure. To our knowledge, this isthe first description on development and validation of AMPby using RP-HPLC method which gives a good resolutionin short analysis time ( 7.5 min). The method is simple,sensitive, specific, and reproducible and may be used inbioavailability and bioequivalence studies.AcknowledgmentsThe authors are thankful to Ami Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. forsupplying them with the Azilsartan Medoxomil Potassium;facilities and grants were given under the UGC-SpecialAssistance Program Department of Research Support (SAPDRS), Department of Science and Technology (DST) NewDelhi, Fund for Improvement of Science and Technology(FIST), National Facility for Drug Discovery and Departmentof Chemistry, Saurashtra University, Rajkot. 360 005, India.The authors are thankful to them for providing analyticalfacilities.References[1] European Medicines Agency, โ€œEdarbi (Azilsartan MedoxomilPotassium),โ€ Assessment Report Procedure no. EMEA/H/C/002293, 2011.[2] Press announcement by The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 244722.htm.[3] M. Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and T. Unger,โ€œInternational union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensinII receptors,โ€ Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 415โ€“472, 2000.[4] M. Ojima, H. Igata, M. Tanaka et al., โ€œIn vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, inreceptor binding and function studies,โ€ Journal of Pharmacologyand Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 336, no. 3, pp. 801โ€“808, 2011.[5] G. L. Bakris, D. Sica, M. Weber et al., โ€œThe comparative effects ofazilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinicblood pressure,โ€ Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 13, no. 2,pp. 81โ€“88, 2011.[6] W. B. White, M. A. Weber, D. Sica et al., โ€œEffects of theangiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versusolmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension,โ€ Hypertension,vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 413โ€“420, 2011.

6[7] K. Madhubabu and K. Bikshalbabu, โ€œReverse phaseโ€”Hplcmethod development and validation of azilsartan medoxomiland chlortalidone in pharmaceutical dosage form,โ€ Journal ofAtoms and Molecules, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 117โ€“126, 2012.[8] โ€œGuidance for industry: bio analytical method validation,โ€US Department of Health and Human Services, Food andDrug Administration, CDER, Rockville, Md, USA, May pdf.ISRN Spectroscopy

International Journal ofMedicinal ChemistryHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014PhotoenergyInternational Journal ofOrganic ChemistryInternationalHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014International Journal ofAnalytical ChemistryHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014Advances inPhysical ChemistryHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014International Journal ofCarbohydrateChemistryHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comJournal ofQuantum ChemistryHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.comVolume 2014Volume 2014Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hind

detection was carried out by photo diode array detector. Chromatographic separation of the analyte AMP was achieved within.min by Waters symmetry C 18 ( . mm, m) column, mobile phase was mM ammonium acetate bu er (pH .): acetonitrile : v/v, ow rate was .mL/min, and the detection was carried out at nm. Calibration curve was linear ( r2 .

Related Documents:

Amendments to the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 Article I Article II Article III Article IV Article V Article VI Article VII Article VIII Article IX Article X Article XI Article XII Article XIII Article XIV Article I: Declaration of Rights Election Ballot # Author Bill/Act # Amendment Sec. Votes for % For Votes Against %

Cleaning validation Process validation Analytical method validation Computer system validation Similarly, the activity of qualifying systems and . Keywords: Process validation, validation protocol, pharmaceutical process control. Nitish Maini*, Saroj Jain, Satish ABSTRACTABSTRACT Sardana Hindu College of Pharmacy, J. Adv. Pharm. Edu. & Res.

Pharmaceutical Engineers (ISPE) GAMP 5. Our validation service is executed in accordance with GxP standards producing a validation library that features the following documents: Validation and Compliance Plan The Validation and Compliance Plan (VCP) defines the methodology, deliverables, and responsibilities for the validation of Qualer.

heard. These goals relate closely to the Validation principles. Validation Principles and Group Work The following eleven axioms are the Validation Principles as revised in 2007. I have tried to find various ways of incorporating the principles into teaching Group Validation and by doing so, anchoring group work to theory. 1.

Validation of standardized methods (ISO 17468) described the rules for validation or re-validation of standardized (ISO or CEN) methods. Based on principles described in ISO 16140-2. -Single lab validation . describes the validation against a reference method or without a reference method using a classical approach or a factorial design approach.

Dipl.-Ing. Becker EN ISO 13849-1 validation EN ISO 13849-2: Validation START Design consideration validation-plan validation-principles documents criteria for fault exclusions faults-lists testing is the testing complete? Validation record end 05/28/13 Seite 4 Analysis category 2,3,4 all

3. Analytical method verification or mini validation to be done before analysing (routine samples) tests like assay, dissolution and related substance in development laboratories etc. 4. Prior starting the validation the satisfactory result should be found in mini validation and formulation should be finalized3. VALIDATION

Analytical Method Development and Validation of Bendamustine in Bulk Using RP-HPLC J Pharm Res Analytical Method Development and Validation of Bendamustine in Bulk Using RP-HPLC . Table 3: Variables in HPLC.-Hplc Method Validation is a key process for effective quality assurance. "Validation" is established documented .