Sources, Costs, And Solutions Fall 2019

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
1.48 MB
50 Pages
Last View : 11d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nixon Dill
Transcription

Sources, Costs, and SolutionsFall 2019Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedSAND AND DUST STORMSIN THE MIDDLE EASTAND NORTH AFRICA(MENA) REGIONEnvironment, Natural Resources & Blue Economy10117 Dust CVR.indd 311/12/19 12:00 PM

SAND AND DUST STORMSIN THE MIDDLE EASTAND NORTH AFRICA(MENA) REGIONSOURCES, COSTS, AND SOLUTIONS

2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank1818 H Street NWWashington, DC 20433Telephone: 202-473-1000Internet: www.worldbank.orgThis work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, andconclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent.The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bankconcerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.Rights and PermissionsThe material in this work is subject to copyright. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this workmay be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given.Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2019. Sand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North AfricaRegion—Sources, Costs, and Solutions. Washington, DC.Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to:World Bank PublicationsThe World Bank Group1818 H Street NWWashington, DC 20433USAFax: 202-522-2625

TABLE OF CONTENTSAcknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vAcronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viExecutive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viiiTrends and Sources of Dust Storms in MENA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Dust Hot Spots and Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Sources and Drivers of Sand and Dust Storms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Impacts of Increased Dust Concentration and Dust Storms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Health Impacts of Dust Deposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Environmental Impacts of Dust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14Economic Costs of Dust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Preventative Actions, Interventions, and Policies against Sand and Dust Storms . . . . . . . 19Early Warning Systems for Dust Storm Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Technical Interventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22National and Regional Government Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Sources, Costs, and Solutionsiii

FIGURESFigure 1: Global Pattern of Dust Frequency Estimated from the Synoptic Present WeatherRecords for the Period of January 1974 to December 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Figure 2: Geographic Distribution of the Dust Atmospheric Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Figure 3: Time Series of Global Monthly Mean Dust Concentration and the Corresponding95% Confidence Interval (in error bars) for the Period 1974–2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Figure 4: Sand and Dust Storms Path and Source Clusters in MENA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Figure 5: Distribution of the Percentage Number of Days per Year with DustOptical Depth 0.2 over North Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Figure 6: Distribution of the Percentage Number of Days per Year with DustOptical Depth 0.2 over the Middle East . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Figure 7: Global PM10 Levels and DALYs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Figure 8: Annual PM10 Concentration, Deaths, and DALYs in MENA Countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Figure 9: Technologies for Sand and Dust Storm Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20TABLESTable 1: Key Physical Factors Influencing Wind Erosion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Table 2: Short-term and Long-term Impacts of Sand and Dust Storms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Table 3: Welfare Losses from Ambient PM2.5 by Region (2011 US billions—PPP adjusted) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Table 4: Mean Annual PM2.5, and Total Deaths and Losses from Pollution by Country . . . . . . 18Table 5: Institutions and Organizations with Dust Forecasting Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22BOXESBox 1: Indirect Human-Induced Factors That Contribute to Sand and Dust Storms . . . . . . . . 9Box 2: Economic Cost Case Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Box 3: UN-Interagency Response to SDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Box 4: Regional Air Pollution Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26ivSand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis report was prepared by Menaal Ebrahim under the guidance of Craig Meisner, SeniorEnvironmental Economist of the World Bank.The team would like to thank their colleagues from the World Bank for their useful adviceand support throughout this project: Benoit Blarel, Practice Manager, Lia Sieghart, PracticeManager, Tim Brown, Senior Natural Resources Management Specialist, Philippe Dardel,Senior Environmental Specialist, Raffaello Cervigni, Lead Environmental Economist, PaolaAgostini, Lead Natural Resources Management Specialist, and Melissa Landesz, SeniorNatural Resources Management Specialist. The team would also like to acknowledge thefinancial support of this study through the Program for Forests (PROFOR) Trust Fund.Sources, Costs, and Solutionsv

ACRONYMS SSDSSDS-WASSMSUAEUAVUNUNCCDUNDPUNECEUNEPviAsian Development BankMeteorological State Agency of SpainAerosol IndexAir Pollution Information Network for AfricaAssociation of Southeast Asian NationsAustralian DollarCentre for Atmosphere Watch and Services (China)Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air PollutionChinese YuanChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseDisability-Adjusted Life YearsEuropean Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasting (UK)Food & Agriculture OrganizationGross Domestic ProductInertial Altitude Reference SystemInfrared Atmospheric Sounding InterferometerInternational Civil Aviation OrganizationInstitute of Health Metrics and EvaluationInternational Telecommunication UnionInternational Union for Conservation of NatureKorea Meteorological AdministrationSquare kilometersMiddle East and North AfricaModerate Resolution Imaging SpectroradiometerNational Institute for Environmental Studies (Japan)National Weather Service (USA)Particulate Matter (diameter less than 2.5 microns)Particulate Matter (diameter less than 10 microns)Peak Expiratory FlowPurchasing Power ParityRegional Air Pollution in Developing CountriesRegional CentreSource ApportionmentSouth Asia Cooperative Environment ProgrammeSoil Conservation Service (USA)Sand and Dust StormSand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment SystemShort Message ServiceUnited Arab EmiratesUnmanned Aerial VehicleUnited NationsUnited Nations Convention to Combat DesertificationUnited Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations Economic Commission for EuropeUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeSand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region

d Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and PacificUnited Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western AsiaUnited Nations Human Settlement ProgrammeUnited Nations Institute for Training and ResearchUnited States DollarsWorld Health OrganizationWorld Meteorological OrganizationWeather Research and ForecastingWireless Sensor NetworkSources, Costs, and Solutionsvii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYDust storms are capable of transporting sediment over thousands of kilometers, but due to the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region’s proximityto the Sahara Desert, the region is one of the dustiest in the world. Dust stormsare transboundary, which has important implications for their mitigation, as effects are felt indifferent countries and even regions than their source of origin. North African dust is transported to as far away as the Amazon Forest, North America, Europe, and China. The SaharaDesert is undoubtedly the biggest dust source, as its dust emissions are about four times asmuch as Arabian deserts. North Africa, the Middle East, South West Asia, and North EastAsia are the regions with the highest dust frequencies and highest Aerosol Index (AI) values.The highest density of dust sources in the Middle East is found in northern Iraq between theTigris and Euphrates rivers and along the Syria-Iraq border. Dust sources in the region arealso generally found in areas with extensive desert cover, low population densities, and sparseagriculture concentrated along river valleys. In terms of occurrences of dust storms, Sudan,Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the Persian Gulf report the greatest number of dust storms overall.While natural sources such as the Sahara are the main contributors to duststorms in MENA, land-use changes and human-induced climate change hasadded anthropogenic sources as well. There are about three times as many naturaldust sources as anthropogenic dust sources, however due to land use changes in the past fewdecades, anthropogenic sources have increased. Most North African dust storms originate fromnatural sources such as the Sahara, but there are some anthropogenic sources too. For instance,Southern Sahel, the Atlas Mountains, and the Mediterranean coast sources are overwhelminglyanthropogenic. The Middle East region also experiences dust storms from a mix of natural andanthropogenic sources. The Aral Sea is an active dust source, as well as dry riverbeds in SaudiArabia. There is a cluster of anthropogenic and hydrologic sources along the Jordan River, particularly on the east side. In addition, Iran has prominent dust sources such as large salty lakesand deserts, but the northwestern part is anthropogenic. Although much dust in the Middle Eastderives from local sources, substantial amounts of dust come from the Sahara.Like sources, drivers of sand and dust storms are also natural and anthropogenic, as both wind speed and land management can cause them. Wind erosion isthe main driver of sand storms and dust emissions in all systems. Essentially, erodibility of surface material coupled with aridity that limits protective effects of vegetation is a natural drivingfactor of sand and dust storms. For instance, the major dust storm event in 2015 in the MiddleEast has been attributed to the wind and arid conditions in the area rather than man-made factors. However, there are many man-made drivers of wind erosion too. Human-induced landdegradation is a driver of wind erosion and a major contributor toward sand and dust storms,as it exposes degraded and dry surfaces with a long wind fetch. Besides resource use and management in drylands, practices that disrupt the hydrology and protection provided by land ingeneral also contribute to sand and dust storms. In addition, land management practices thatresult in deforestation and clearance of vegetation will lead to an increase of wind velocity, aswell as reduce the entrapment of particles. The complementary piece titled ‘Sustainable LandManagement and Restoration in the Middle East and North Africa Region—Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations’ provides details on land degradation severity, drivers, and impacts and providesinsights into the human-induced drivers of dust storms in MENA.viiiSand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region

Dust deposition has wide-ranging health impacts, such as causing and aggravating asthma, bronchitis, respiratory diseases, and infections and lungcancer. Populations far from the source regions are exposed to a wide range of air quality–related health problems when long-range atmospheric transport carries dust. For instance,African dust transported to the Caribbean and Florida has deteriorated air quality standardsin those areas and makes up half of South Florida’s airborne particles in the summer. Poorair quality and dust cause numerous health problems, both near the dust storm and thousands of kilometers away. Inhalation of fine particles can cause or aggravate diseases such asasthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and silicosis. Chronic exposure can be linked to respiratorydisease, lung cancer, and acute lower respiratory infections.Apart from devastating health impacts, dust also impacts the environment,agriculture, transport, and infrastructure. For the environment, dust can have bothnegative and positive effects. Dust storms have some positive global impacts due to their transboundary nature and the importance of dust in global climate and terrestrial and biogeochemical cycling. For instance, dust fertilizes and sustains both oceans and forests, playinga huge part in the earth’s biogeochemical cycles. While dust boosts primary productivity ofoceans, it could have damaging effects on coral reefs. In addition, dust has been also associated with leading to and exacerbating climatic events such as storms, droughts, and the melting of glaciers. Dust deposition and dust storms are also associated with many other costs suchas crop damage, livestock mortality, infrastructure damage, and interruption of transport.Globally, welfare losses from dust are approximately 3.6 trillion USD, wherecosts are about 150 billion USD and over 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on average in MENA. Dust storm costs range from negative health impactsto reducing crop yields to lowering property values to steering talented workers away frompolluted places. The World Health Organization estimates that 7 million people die frompoor air quality every year, which is at least partly attributed to dust. A study prepared by theWorld Bank and the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) calculated welfarelosses from ambient PM2.5 pollution for each country, where welfare losses represent thecost of premature mortality. Global welfare losses from premature mortality are large andincreasing from 2.2 trillion in 1990 to 3.6 trillion USD in 2013. For MENA, dust concentration and storms cost MENA over 150 billion USD annually and over 2.5 percent of GDPfor most countries in the region. According to the UN, about 13 billion USD are lost everyyear from dust storms alone in the MENA region and welfare losses from PM2.5 alone wereabout 141 billion USD in 2013. The biggest welfare losses were incurred by Egypt, Iran, andPakistan.Besides investing in early warning systems, governments all over the worldare designing policies to mitigate the impact of sand and dust storms, bothat national and regional levels. Devastating impacts from sand and dust storms in theAmericas, MENA region, and East Asia have encouraged governments to enforce manylarge-scale initiatives and plans. In many instances, these initiatives also tackle land degradation, terrestrial biodiversity, and climate change mitigation. However, policies designed tomitigate the wider impacts of sand and dust storms, including many that are transboundary,are geographically patchy and have a much shorter history. Regional and international cooperation among countries will lead to greater understanding of the transportation paths ofdust storms, particle content, and their impacts. Eventually, regional action will also lead toreduced the occurrence of dust storms. Recent years have seen some regional air pollutionpolicies emerge, but more collaboration is needed and should be sustained.Sources, Costs, and Solutionsix

TRENDS AND SOURCES OF DUSTSTORMS IN MENASand and dust storms (SDS) are complex events with transboundary impacts.Sand and dust storms result from the erosion and transport of mineral sediments from land.Sand particles are larger than dust, but both are typically associated with dryland areas andcan occur anywhere where there are dry unprotected sediments.1 They could lift large quantities of dust particles into the air and transport them hundreds or thousands of kilometersaway.2 SDS occur because of interlinked direct and indirect drivers, divided into natural andanthropogenic sources. Concern on sand and dust storms is growing considering their hugeimpacts on the economy, human health, and the environment.DUST HOT SPOTS AND TRENDSThe MENA region, which neighbors the Sahara Desert, is the dustiest regionin the world. Nine regions contribute to the total global production of desert dust: NorthAfrica (Sahara), South Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, Central Asia, Western China, EasternChina, North America, South America and Australia.3, 4 North Africa, the Middle East,South West Asia, and North East Asia are the regions with the highest dust frequencies, asobserved from synoptic weather reports (Figure 1).5 Similarly, in terms of Aerosol Index(AI) hot spots, the Sahara and Asian deserts are dominant, whereas AI values are low inthe Southern Hemisphere and the Americas.6 The dust observed in the Caribbean is transported dust from the Sahara, while the dust observed in Mexico may be partly related to thedust activities in the Chihuahua Desert.7, 8 The Sahara Desert is undoubtedly the biggestdust source, as its dust emissions are about four times as much as Arabian deserts.Dust can travel thousands of kilometers, as North African dust is transportedas far as the Caribbean. Dust storms are capable of transporting sediment over thousands of kilometers. Dust storms are transboundary, which has important implications for their1Middletonand Goudie, Desert Dust in the Global System.Didevarasl, and Saadatabadi, “Dust Events in the Western Parts of Iran and the Relationship with DroughtExpansion over the Dust-Source Areas in Iraq and Syria.”3Prospero et al., “Environmental Characterization of Global Sources of Atmospheric Soil Dust Identified with the Nimbus 7Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) Absorbing Aerosol Product.”4Tanaka and Chiba, “A Numerical Study of the Contributions of Dust Source Regions to the Global Dust Budget.”5Shao, Klose, and Wyrwoll, “Recent Global Dust Trend and Connections to Climate Forcing.”6Middleton and Goudie, Desert Dust in the Global System.7Prospero, “Long-Range Transport of Mineral Dust in the Global Atmosphere.”8Liu et al., “CALIPSO Lidar Observations of the Optical Properties of Saharan Dust.”2Zoljoodi,Sources, Costs, and Solutions1

FIGURE 1: GLOBAL PATTERN OF DUST FREQUENCY ESTIMATED FROM THE SYNOPTICPRESENT WEATHER RECORDS FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1974 TO DECEMBER 2012Source: Shao et al., 2013.mitigation, as effects are felt in different countries and even regions than their source of origin.For instance, dust from China can reach the European Alps, after being transported acrossthe Pacific and Atlantic Oceans over 13 days.9 Dust from Central Asia and China reachesKorea, Japan, the Pacific Islands, and North America.10 Based on estimates made by Tanakaand Chiba (2006), Figure 2 shows the geographical distribution of the desert dust atmosphericloads, in mg m 2.11 North African dust is transported to as far away as the Amazon Forest,North America, Europe, and China. The westward dust movement from the Sahara is thelargest flow, accounting for 30–50 percent of the output. For example, transport to the Caribbean, where 20 million tons of Saharan dust are deposited annually, typically takes 5 to 7 days.While dust emissions have generally been high and increased over the last century, the past two decades have not seen a rise in emissions from the NorthAfrica region. Simulations suggest that global annual dust emissions have increased by 25to 50 percent over the last century due to a combination of land use and climate changes.Sand and dust storm frequency and severity have increased in recent decades in some areasbut decreased in other areas. However, a recent analysis by Shao et al. (2013) revealed thatover the period 1984–2012, the global mean of near-surface dust concentration decreasedat 1.2 percent per year (Figure 3).12 This decrease is mainly due to reduced dust activitiesin North Africa, accompanied by reduced activities in Northeast Asia, South America, andSouth Africa. This could be attributed to recovery of vegetation because of rainfall followingthe droughts in the 1980s, leading to a reduction in wind.13 However other studies concludethat a reduction in wind cannot be directly linked to changes in land use.149Groussetet al., “Case Study of a Chinese Dust Plume Reaching the French Alps.”and Goudie, Desert Dust in the Global System.11Tanaka and Chiba, “A Numerical Study of the Contributions of Dust Source Regions to the Global Dust Budget.”12Shao, Klose, and Wyrwoll, “Recent Global Dust Trend and Connections to Climate Forcing.”13Cowie, Knippertz, and Marsham, “Are Vegetation-Related Roughness Changes the Cause of the Recent Decrease in DustEmission from the Sahel?”14Ridley, Heald, and Prospero, “What Controls the Recent Changes in African Mineral Dust Aerosol across the Atlantic?”10Middleton2Sand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region

FIGURE 2: GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE DUST ATMOSPHERIC LOADSource: De Longueville et al., 2010.15FIGURE 3: TIME SERIES OF GLOBAL MONTHLY MEAN DUST CONCENTRATIONAND THE CORRESPONDING 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (IN ERROR BARS)FOR THE PERIOD 1974–2012Source: Shao et al., 2013.15DeLongueville et al., “What Do We Know about Effects of Desert Dust on Air Quality and Human Health in West AfricaCompared to Other Regions?”Sources, Costs, and Solutions3

Countries in the Middle East experience varying frequencies of dust stormsdepending on the time of year. The Middle East region is a notable dust hot spot, especially during the summer months when the dust storms in the region are often associatedwith Shamal winds.16 Sudan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the Persian Gulf report the greatestnumber of dust storms overall.17 In the summer months, Iran, Iraq, Syria, the Persian Gulf,and the southern Arabian Peninsula experience the most dust storms. In western Iraq andSyria, Jordan, Lebanon, northern Israel, northern Arabian Peninsula, and southern Egyptthey occur mainly in the spring, while in southern Israel and in the Mediterranean parts ofnorthern Egypt, they occur in winter and spring.18Sand and dust storms in MENA are determined by numerous climate systemsand pathways. There are a variety of climate systems that govern the distribution ofsand and dust storm events in the MENA region such as the Siberian, polar, and monsooncyclones, and the depressions in the non-summer months. In MENA, most of dust stormsystems can be classified into Summer Shamal and frontal dust storms.19 Shamal dust stormsusually occur across Iraq, Kuwait, western part of Khuzestan plain, and some parts of Arabian Peninsula, whereas frontal dust storms occur across Jordan, Israel, and the northernArabian Peninsula.20 There are six main sand and dust storm paths dominated by the climate in MENA (Figure 4). The first path originates from the Mediterranean Sea passing overCyprus and enters Syria. The second path is under the control of a high-pressure systemover east of Europe.21 The third path comes from south of the Mediterranean Sea or coastalof northern Africa and always strikes south of Syria or the north border of Jordan and SaudiArabia. The fourth path is from north of Africa which usually passes across Egypt, north ofthe Red Sea, and blows toward southeast in Saudi Arabia.22 The fifth path is also locatedin the depressions in north of Africa. The last path originates from Sistan Plain at the Iran–Afghanistan border which is controlled by anticyclone over central Asia. Air masses from theMediterranean Sea are important factors for the generation of sand and dust storms whichcover about 70 percent dust storm events.23SOURCES AND DRIVERS OF SANDAND DUST STORMSSOURCES OF SAND AND DUST STORMSSand and dust storm sources and drivers are both natural and anthropogenic.There is need to distinguish drivers of sand and dust storms from natural sources, which supply most of the global dust emissions and anthropogenic sources. However natural ecosystems are increasingly being subject to human pressure, which may intensify their importanceas source areas in the future.24 Although there is currently much uncertainty on the magnitude of human activity on sand and dust storms, disturbance of natural systems throughhuman pressure is highly likely to increase in the coming decades, including through human- induced climate change.16Choobari,17Furman,Zawar-Reza, and Sturman, “The Global Distribution of Mineral Dust and Its Impacts on the Climate System.”“Dust Storms in the Middle East.”18Ibid.19Hamidi,Kavianpour, and Shao, “Synoptic Analysis of Dust Storms in the Middle East.”“Dust Storms in the Middle East.”21Hamidi, Kavianpour, and Shao, “Synoptic Analysis of Dust Storms in the Middle East.”22Wilderson, “Dust and Sand Forecasting in Iraq and Adjoining Countries.”23Cao et al., “Identification of Dust Storm Source Areas in West Asia Using Multiple Environmental Datasets.”24Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem.20Middleton,4Sand and Dust Storms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region

FIGURE 4: SAND AND DUST STORMS PATH AND SOURCE CLUSTERS IN MENASource: Cao et al., 2015.Globally, there are about three times as many natural dust sources as anthropogenic dust sources; however, due to land use changes in the past few decades,anthropogenic sources have increased. There are three dust source types: hydrologic,dust linked to various water features as discussed above; natural, dust emitted from landsurfaces where land use is less than 30 percent; and anthropogenic, sources where land useexceeds 30 percent. North Africa accounts for 55 percent of global dust emissions with only8 percent being anthropogenic, mostly from the Sahel. Hydrologic dust sources (e.g., ephemeral water bodies) account for 31 percent worldwide; 15 percent of them are natural while85 percent are anthropogenic. Overall, natural dust sources globally account for 75 percentof emissions and anthropogenic sources account for the rest.Most North African dust comes from natural sources such as the Sahara,with some anthropogenic sources. Southern Sahel sources are overwhelminglyanthropogenic (locations 1 to 5), whereas the Sahara is the most significant naturalSources, Costs, and Solutions5

FIGURE 5: DISTRIBUTION OF THE PERCENTAGE NUMBER OF DAYSPER YEAR WITH DUST OPTICAL DEPTH 0.2 OVER NORTH AFRICASource: Ginoux et al., 2012.25source (locations 6 to 11) (Figure 5). This could be explained by the fact that agriculturaland grazing activities in regions with some rainfall are confined to relatively localized

anthropogenic. The Middle East region also experiences dust storms from a mix of natural and anthropogenic sources. The Aral Sea is an active dust source, as well as dry riverbeds in Saudi Arabia. There is a cluster of anthropogenic and hydrologic sources along the Jordan

Related Documents:

45678 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 F 54321 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 A-76543 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 A CS-347 1 Fall 2009 Taylor 3128 C 00128 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A-12345 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 23856 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 54321 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 76543 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 10.7 Answer: a. Everytime a record is

FISH & WILDLIFE COSTS 17TH ANNUAL REPORT TO THE NORTHWEST GOVERNORS PAGE 3 Figures 08 Figure 1: Costs by Major Area, FY2017, as Reported by Bonneville's Fish and Wildlife Division 09 Figure 2: Costs by Types of Species 10 Figure 3: Costs of FCRPS BiOp Projects 11 Figure 4: Costs Associated with ESA Listed Fish 12 Figure 5: Costs by Fund 13 Figure 6A: Costs by Category

Table 2 The Various Measures of Cost: Thirsty Thelma's Lemonade Stand Average Costs Average costs can be determined by dividing the firm's costs by the quantity of output it produces. The average cost is the cost of each typical unit of product. Average Costs Average Fixed Costs (AFC) Average Variable Costs (AVC)

Fall Protection Categories All fall protection products fit into four functional categories. 1. Fall Arrest; 2. Positioning; 3. Suspension; 4. Retrieval. Fall Arrest: A fall arrest system is required if any risk exists that a worker may fall from an elevated position, as a general rule, the fall

comprise of core APC costs of 26.4 billion in 2015-16, mental health costs of 6.9 billion, community costs of 5.4 billion and ambulance costs of 1.7 billion. 15. Figure 2 shows the total costs reported in 2015-16, split by setting10. The largest single proportion of costs is non-elective inpatient care, which accounts for 25.9% of

2017 Affordable Rental Housing Program & Underwriting Guidelines Elderly: A person sixty-two (62) years of age or older. Eligible Costs - project costs that can be paid with CDD funds. Costs include, but are not limited to, costs or partial costs of acquisition, verifiable hard construction costs, reasonable soft costs,

fall protection systems/equipment and the recognition of fall hazards related to their use, including: - a. The nature of fall hazards in the work area; - b. The correct procedures for erecting, using , dismantling, maintaining, and storing fall protection equipment; - c. The application limits, free fall distance, total fall distance and .

Parag B. Deotare University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2 /7 Teaching, Education and Outreach [Winter 2017, Fall 2017, 2018, 2019] University of Michigan: EECS 334, Principles of Optics [Fall 2017, Fall 2018, Fall 2019 2020] University of Michigan: EECS 438, Advanced Laser Lab [Fall 2016, Fall 2017, Fall 2018