Polk County Public Schools Auburndale Senior High School
Polk County Public SchoolsAuburndale Senior HighSchool2020-21 Schoolwide ImprovementPlan
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPTable of ContentsSchool Demographics3Purpose and Outline of the SIP4School Information5Needs Assessment8Planning for Improvement13Positive Culture & Environment18Budget to Support Goals19Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 2 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPAuburndale Senior High School1 BLOODHOUND TRL, Auburndale, FL icsPrincipal: Tye BrunoStart Date for this Principal: 6/1/20182019-20 Status(per MSID File)ActiveSchool Type and Grades Served(per MSID File)High School9-12Primary Service Type(per MSID File)K-12 General Education2018-19 Title I SchoolYes2018-19 EconomicallyDisadvantaged (FRL) Rate(as reported on Survey 3)71%2018-19 ESSA Subgroups Represented(subgroups with 10 or more students)(subgroups in orange are below the federal threshold)Black/African American StudentsEconomically Disadvantaged StudentsEnglish Language LearnersHispanic StudentsMultiracial StudentsStudents With DisabilitiesWhite Students2018-19: C (52%)2017-18: C (47%)School Grades History2016-17: C (46%)2015-16: C (42%)2019-20 School Improvement (SI) Information*SI RegionSoutheastRegional Executive DirectorDiane LeinenbachTurnaround Option/CycleN/AYearSupport TierESSA StatusLast Modified: 6/25/2020TS&Ihttps://www.floridacims.orgPage 3 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIP* As defined under Rule 6A-1.099811, Florida Administrative Code. For more information, clickhere.School Board ApprovalThis plan is pending approval by the Polk County School Board.SIP AuthoritySection 1001.42(18), Florida Statutes, requires district school boards to annually approve andrequire implementation of a Schoolwide Improvement Plan (SIP) for each school in the districtthat has a school grade of D or F. This plan is also a requirement for Targeted Support andImprovement (TS&I) and Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CS&I) schools pursuant to1008.33 F.S. and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).To be designated as TS&I, a school must have one or more ESSA subgroup(s) with a FederalIndex below 41%. This plan shall be approved by the district. There are three ways a school canbe designated as CS&I:1. have a school grade of D or F2. have a graduation rate of 67% or lower3. have an overall Federal Index below 41%.For these schools, the SIP shall be approved by the district as well as the Bureau of SchoolImprovement.The Florida Department of Education (FDOE) SIP template meets all statutory and rulerequirements for traditional public schools and incorporates all components required for schoolsreceiving Title I funds. This template is required by State Board of Education Rule 6A-1.099811,Florida Administrative Code, for all non-charter schools with a current grade of D or F, or agraduation rate 67% or less. Districts may opt to require a SIP using a template of its choosingfor schools that do not fit the aforementioned conditions. This document was prepared by schooland district leadership using the FDOE's school improvement planning web application located atwww.floridacims.org.Purpose and Outline of the SIPThe SIP is intended to be the primary artifact used by every school with stakeholders to reviewdata, set goals, create an action plan and monitor progress. The Florida Department of Educationencourages schools to use the SIP as a “living document” by continually updating, refining andusing the plan to guide their work throughout the year. This printed version represents the SIP asof the “Date Modified” listed in the footer.Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 4 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPPart I: School InformationSchool Mission and VisionProvide the school's mission statementThe mission of Auburndale High School is to prepare our students to become successful incollege, career, and citizenship.Provide the school's vision statementThe vision of Auburndale High School is to create an extraordinary environment thatinspires greatness.School Leadership TeamMembershipIdentify the name, email address, position title, and job duties/responsibilities for eachmember of the school leadership team.:NameTitleBruno, TyePrincipalMills, JennAssistant PrincipalWilder, TyroneAssistant PrincipalPortillo, IsmaelAssistant PrincipalLancaster, PamDeanSchneider, CarrieAssistant PrincipalGiles, JoslynTeacher, Career/TechnicalHilton, LeslieInstructional CoachMarazzi, AlisonInstructional CoachGraham, LindseyDeanJob Duties and ResponsibilitiesDean and Title I CoordinatorDemographic InformationPrincipal start dateFriday 6/1/2018, Tye BrunoNumber of teachers with a 2019 3-year aggregate or a 1-year Algebra state VAMrating of Highly Effective. Note: For UniSIG Supplemental Teacher Allocation, teachersmust have at least 10 student assessments.0Number of teachers with a 2019 3-year aggregate or a 1-year Algebra state VAMrating of Effective. Note: For UniSIG Supplemental Teacher Allocation, teachers musthave at least 10 student assessments.11Total number of teacher positions allocated to the school87Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 5 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPDemographic Data2020-21 Status(per MSID File)ActiveSchool Type and Grades Served(per MSID File)High School9-12Primary Service Type(per MSID File)K-12 General Education2018-19 Title I SchoolYes2018-19 EconomicallyDisadvantaged (FRL) Rate(as reported on Survey 3)71%2018-19 ESSA Subgroups Represented(subgroups with 10 or more students)(subgroups in orange are below the federalthreshold)Black/African American StudentsEconomically DisadvantagedStudentsEnglish Language LearnersHispanic StudentsMultiracial StudentsStudents With DisabilitiesWhite Students2018-19: C (52%)2017-18: C (47%)School Grades History2016-17: C (46%)2015-16: C (42%)2019-20 School Improvement (SI) Information*SI RegionSoutheastRegional Executive DirectorDiane LeinenbachTurnaround Option/CycleN/AYearSupport TierESSA StatusTS&I* As defined under Rule 6A-1.099811, Florida Administrative Code. For more information,click here.Early Warning SystemsCurrent YearThe number of students by grade level that exhibit each early warningindicator listed:Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 6 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPGrade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112TotalNumber of students enrolled0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 415 426 384 356 1581Attendance below 90 percent0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 049737573270One or more suspensions0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 090985946293Course failure in ELA0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000Course failure in Math0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000Level 1 on 2019 statewide ELAassessment0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07119440152Level 1 on 2019 statewide Mathassessment0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 002910434167The number of students with two or more early warning indicators:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Students with two or more indicators910 11 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 108 76 64Total357The number of students identified as retainees:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 12TotalRetained Students: Current Year0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 1751269Students retained two or more times0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2191768Date this data was collected or last updatedTuesday 6/2/2020Prior Year - As ReportedThe number of students by grade level that exhibit each early warningindicator:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112TotalNumber of students enrolled0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 421 432 430 350 1633Attendance below 90 percent0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 049577861245One or more suspensions0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 021227Course failure in ELA or Math0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 067734930219Level 1 on statewide assessment0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 176 167 142676The number of students with two or more early warning indicators:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Students with two or more indicatorsLast Modified: 6/25/2020910 11 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 72 65 45https://www.floridacims.orgTotal252Page 7 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPThe number of students identified as retainees:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 12Retained Students: Current Year0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 91 88 65Students retained two or more times0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 051365Total32329Prior Year - UpdatedThe number of students by grade level that exhibit each early warningindicator:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112TotalNumber of students enrolled0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 421 432 430 350 1633Attendance below 90 percent0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 049577861245One or more suspensions0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 021227Course failure in ELA or Math0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 067734930219Level 1 on statewide assessment0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 176 167 142676The number of students with two or more early warning indicators:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Students with two or more indicators910 11 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 72 65 45Total252The number of students identified as retainees:Grade LevelIndicatorK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 12Retained Students: Current Year0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 91 88 65Students retained two or more times0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 051365Total32329Part II: Needs Assessment/AnalysisSchool DataPlease note that the district and state averages shown here represent the averages for similarschool types (elementary, middle, high school, or combination schools).School Grade ComponentELA AchievementELA Learning GainsELA Lowest 25th PercentileMath AchievementMath Learning GainsMath Lowest 25th PercentileScience AchievementLast Modified: 8%45%67%Page 8 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPSchool Grade ComponentSocial Studies 8%2018District63%State71%EWS Indicators as Input Earlier in the SurveyGrade Level (prior year reported)9101112(0)(0)(0)(0)IndicatorTotal0 (0)Grade Level DataNOTE: This data is raw data and includes ALL students who tested at the school.This is not school grade data.ELAGradeYear0920192018Same Grade ComparisonCohort Comparison1020192018Same Grade ComparisonCohort olSchool43%47%CompareLast Modified: trictComparisonBIOLOGY usState-24%-18%Page 9 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPYearSchoolCIVICS reHISTORY RA METRY bgroup Data2019 SCHOOL GRADE COMPONENTS BY SUBGROUPSELAMathGradC&CELA ELAMath MathSciSSMSSubgroupsLGLGRateAccelAch. LGAch.LGAch. Ach. Accel.L25%L25%2016-17 83542018 SCHOOL GRADE COMPONENTS BY SUBGROUPSELAMathGradC&CELA ELAMath MathSciSSMSSubgroupsLGLGRateAccelAch. LGAch.LGAch. Ach. Accel.L25%L25%2015-16 8069Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 10 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIP2018 SCHOOL GRADE COMPONENTS BY SUBGROUPSELAMathGradC&CELA ELAMath MathSciSSMSSubgroupsLGLGRateAccelAch. LGAch.LGAch. Ach. Accel.L25%L25%2015-16 3633363241448065ESSA DataThis data has been updated for the 2018-19 school year as of 7/16/2019.ESSA Federal IndexESSA Category (TS&I or CS&I)TS&IOVERALL Federal Index – All Students50OVERALL Federal Index Below 41% All StudentsNOTotal Number of Subgroups Missing the TargetProgress of English Language Learners in Achieving English Language Proficiency136Total Points Earned for the Federal Index551Total Components for the Federal Index11Percent Tested98%Subgroup DataStudents With DisabilitiesFederal Index - Students With Disabilities41Students With Disabilities Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NONumber of Consecutive Years Students With Disabilities Subgroup Below 32%0English Language LearnersFederal Index - English Language LearnersEnglish Language Learners Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?Number of Consecutive Years English Language Learners Subgroup Below 32%32YES0Asian StudentsFederal Index - Asian StudentsAsian Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?Number of Consecutive Years Asian Students Subgroup Below 32%N/A0Black/African American StudentsFederal Index - Black/African American Students42Black/African American Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NOLast Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 11 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPBlack/African American StudentsNumber of Consecutive Years Black/African American Students Subgroup Below 32%0Hispanic StudentsFederal Index - Hispanic Students49Hispanic Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NONumber of Consecutive Years Hispanic Students Subgroup Below 32%0Multiracial StudentsFederal Index - Multiracial Students57Multiracial Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NONumber of Consecutive Years Multiracial Students Subgroup Below 32%0Native American StudentsFederal Index - Native American StudentsNative American Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?Number of Consecutive Years Native American Students Subgroup Below 32%N/A0Pacific Islander StudentsFederal Index - Pacific Islander StudentsPacific Islander Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?Number of Consecutive Years Pacific Islander Students Subgroup Below 32%N/A0White StudentsFederal Index - White Students55White Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NONumber of Consecutive Years White Students Subgroup Below 32%0Economically Disadvantaged StudentsFederal Index - Economically Disadvantaged Students43Economically Disadvantaged Students Subgroup Below 41% in the Current Year?NONumber of Consecutive Years Economically Disadvantaged Students Subgroup Below32%0AnalysisData ReflectionAnswer the following reflection prompts after examining any/all relevant school datasources (see guide for examples for relevant data sources).Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 12 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIPWhich data component showed the lowest performance? Explain thecontributing factor(s) to last year’s low performance and discuss any trendsThe data component that showed the lowest performance was ELA. From our 9th and10th graders that completed progress monitoring (2019-2020, 3rd quarter districtquarterly assessments), 34% of those tested scored a level 1. In 2018-2019, 37% of our9th and 10th graders scored a level 1 in ELA. The data for the current year does notinclude ELA FSA test scores as students did not particpate in FSA testing. Therefore,quarterly assessment data was also utilized as an additional data source.Which data component showed the greatest decline from the prior year?Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this declineThe data component that showed the greatest decline from the prior year is ELA,specificially Learning Gains (44% to 40%) and Lowest 25th Percentile (37% to 26%).Factors that contributed to this decline are poor student attendance and high number ofdiscipline referrals.Which data component had the greatest gap when compared to the stateaverage? Explain the factor(s) that contributed to this gap and any trendsThe data component that had the greatest gap when compared to the state average isScience Achievement (Biology EOC, with AHS at 46% proficient and the state at 68%proficient). Factors that contributed towards this trend are poor student attendance andhigh number of discipline referrals.Which data component showed the most improvement? What new actions didyour school take in this area?The data component that showed the most improvement was improving US Historyproficiency. Actions that our school took in this area include:Common planning, with monitoring and support by administration.Utilizing formative assessments and analyzed data to drive instruction (reteaching).Provided reading support for U.S. History teachers, focused on non-fiction text.Utilization of LSI framework for instruction.Reflecting on the EWS data from Part I (D), identify one or two potential areasof concern?Two areas of potential concern are the number of students that earned a Level 1 on 2019statewide ELA assessment and the number of students with one or more suspensions.Rank your highest priorities (maximum of 5) for schoolwide improvement inthe upcoming school year1. Improving ELA proficiency2. ELL students3. Discipline (Choice Room visits)4. Diversity Compliance (Initially, we were below 5%, but after the fall report, wereincreased our area to above 5%)5.Part III: Planning for ImprovementAreas of Focus:Last Modified: 6/25/2020https://www.floridacims.orgPage 13 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Senior High School - 2020-21 SIP#1. Instructional Practice specifically relating to ELAArea ofFocusDescriptionandRationale:The data component that showed the lowest performance in 2018-2019 isELA, with 37% of our students being proficient in ELA. Data from our highneeds subgroup (ELL subgroup) also showed that in 2018, 16% of ELLstudents were proficient in ELA, which decreased to 9% proficient in 2019. InELA, The federal index for our ELL students was 32, which needs to beincreased to 41.Our 2018-2019, 37% of our 9th and 10th graders were proficient in FSAMeasureableEnglish Language Arts. The desired outcome for 2020-2021 is to increase theOutcome:number of proficient 9th and 10th graders to 42%.Personresponsibleformonitoringoutcome:Leslie Hilton TAR assessments, LSI, WICOR strategies, and writing progress monitoringRationaleforEvidencebasedStrategy:The evidence-based strategies were selected because they are aligned withour district goals. Our school data shows only 37% of our students areproficient with reading and literacy skills.Action Steps to Implement1. School-based coaches will provide reading support for all staff based on determined needsthrough common planning and PLC2. Students will complete quarterly assessments to guide instruction3. Common planing will be utilized to create target instruction lessons and in ELA andReading to meet the needs of all students at all levels4. Utilization of district learning maps and pacing guides and resources5. Common board configurations for all classrooms6. Administration will complete classroom walk-throughs, lesson plan checks, and reviewstudent test data to ensure students are making adequate progress7. LY students will be placed in a sheltered Reading class8. WICOR and LSI strategies will be used across content in all classes9. Technology such as Smart Boards and laptops will be utilized to supplement learning.10. District PD will be used to support teacher development and guide instructional activitiesPersonResponsibleLast Modified: 6/25/2020Carrie Schneider ims.orgPage 14 of 19
Polk - 0811 - Auburndale Sen
Polk County Public Schools Auburndale Senior High School 2020-21 Schoolwide Improvement Plan. Table of Contents School Demographics 3 . (elementary, middle, high school, or combination schools). 2019 2018 School Grade Component School District State School District State ELA Achievement 37% 47% 56% 37% 46% 56% ELA Learning Gains 40% 46% 51% .
THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS IN POLK COUNTY The need for public schools was paramount in the thinking of the first settlers of Polk County. The urgency for schools was re flected by the action taken by the three county commissioners be fore the first general election of county officers in December, 1872,
Polk County Projects Construct Central Polk Parkway from the Polk Parkway / SR 570 to US 17 FPN: 440897-2 The project constructs the first segment of the Central Polk Parkway linking the Polk Parkway / SR 570 at Winter Lake Road / SR 540 to US 17. The proposed 6-mile roadway will be a four-lane, divided, limited-access facility that will
well as high rates of obesity that are impacted by individuals’ ability to go outside and get active, sidewalks have become a priority for Polk County. Polk Vision’s Infrastructure Team developed a tactical plan focusing on eliminating sidewalk gaps within a one-mile radius of public schools in Polk County. This tactical plan has been added .
Joint Readiness Training Center & Fort Polk "Draft Deliberative Document - For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA" 8 As of: 11Feb2004 SWRO WB X HQS JRTC & FORT POLK XX OPS GRP X 2 ACR III USAG X IMA XX Fort Polk Tenant UnitsFort Polk Tenant Units FORSCOM XXXX TRADOC XXXX XVIII ABC XXX MEDDAC X DENTAC X WB Hqs MP Bn EN Bn C/46 EN .
and Rehabilitative Services (FHRS) recommended Polk County Public Health Unit (CPHU) test these wells in the department's October 1994 Site Review and Update report. Polk CPHU tested these wells in July 1995. The Alpha Resins Corporation (ARC), fonnerly known as Alpha Chemical Corporation, is near Kathleen, Polk County, Florida (Figures 1 and 2).
BRYN MAWR Public AUBURN Worcester 98%99% 100% 0.0% MARY D STONE Public AUBURN Worcester 99% 100% 98% 1.2% 0.0% MONTESSORI CHILDRENS HOUSE Private AUBURN Worcester † C C BURR ELEMENTARY Public AUBURNDALE Middlesex 97%98% 1.6% 0.0% WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY Public AUBURNDALE Middlesex 95%98% 100% 1.6%
Polk 517 -- 517 Polk Area 5,179 -- 5,179 Note: * Public schools include city as well as county schools systems. Private schools data is not available for 2020 from Georgia Independent School Association. High School Graduates - 2020 Source: The Governor's Office of Student Achievement of Georgia.
7. What is the name of this sequence of events which results in the production of a protein? 8. What is Reverse Transcription? 9. When does Reverse Transcription occur? 10. How can Reverse Transcription be used in Biotechnology? DESIGNER GENES: PRACTICE –MOLECULAR-GENETIC GENETICS 2 CENTRAL DOGMA OF MOLECULAR GENETICS 1. Where is DNA housed in Eukaryotic Cells? most is stored in the nucleus .
