2m ago
523.02 KB
12 Pages
Last View : 3d ago
Last Download : n/a
Upload by : Ciara Libby

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GovernorSTATE OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSChristine Baker, Director1515 Clay Street, 17th FloorOakland, CA 94612Tel: (510) 286-7087 Fax: (510) 622-3265Michael Cohen, DirectorDepartment of Finance915 L StreetSacramento, CA 95814Joint Legislative Budget Committee1020 N Street, Room 553Sacramento, CA 95814Attention: Peggy CollinsJoint Legislative Budget Committee Members:Senator Holly J. Mitchell (Chair)Senator Patricia C. BatesSenator Jean FullerSenator Ricardo LaraSenator Bill MonningSenator Jim NelsonSenator Richard PanSenator Nancy SkinnerAssembly Member Philip Y. Ting (Vice Chair)Assembly Member Dr. Joaquin ArambulaAssembly Member Richard BloomAssembly Member Rocky J. ChavezAssembly Member Kevin McCartyAssembly Member Melissa A. MelendezAssembly Member Jay ObernolteAssembly Member Shirley WeberSubject: Labor Enforcement Task Force Report to the LegislaturePursuant to the Budget Act of 2012 (Assembly Bill1464 , Chapter 21, Statutes of 2012), theDepartment of Industrial Relations (DIR) is pleased to report to the Director of Finance and the JointLegislative Budget Committee on the accomplishments of the Labor Enforcement Task Force(LETF). This report covers activity from 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, and it is also availableonline at LETF mission is to combat the underground economy in order to ensure safe workingconditions and proper payment of wages for workers; to create an environment in which legitimatebusinesses can thrive; and to support the collection of all California taxes, fees, and penalties duefrom employers. The LETF uses both data-driven and complaint-driven methods to targetnoncompliant employers. Staff from the Labor Commissioner's Office, Cal/OSHA, EDD, CSLB,and other partner agencies coordinate to identify bad actors, share information, and conduct jointenforcement. Each agency on its own does not have access to the full range of data and otherinformation that the LETF teams can access through cooperation.

This collaborative enforcement approach has clear benefits. LETF joint inspections have foundconsistently high rates of noncompliance . In 2016 LETF found that an average of 91% of employersinspected each month were out of compliance with at least one LETF partner agency.LETF is committed to education and outreach to ensure that employers know their responsibilitiesand workers know their rights. To this end, LETF has produced educational materials for bothemployers and workers. LETF and its partners have participated in a various outreach events,including workshops to educate workers and seminars to engage with employer groups and industryassociations. ·Increased coordination across agencies and data sharing as permitted by law will enhance overallresponse time, eliminate activity overlap, refine targeting, and enable performance monitoring forongoing evaluation. DIR looks forward to increased collaboration and enhanced effectivenessthrough the LETF and related enforcement efforts. If you have any questions, please do not hesitateto contact me.Sincerely,/S/Christine BakerChristine BakerDirector

LETF Five-Year Report (2012-2016)to the California Legislature

Table of ContentsLETF Five-Year Report (2012-2016). 2A. Targeting Methods: Value Added by the LETF. 2Average Percentage of Businesses Found out of Compliance per month by Year, 2012 2016. 3B. Joint Enforcement Activity: Value Added by the LETF . 4Table 1. Cal/OSHA Results . 4Table 2. DLSE Results . 5Table 3. EDD Results . 6Table 4. CSLB Results. 6Table 5. BAR Results. 6Table 6. BOE Results. 7C.D.E.F.Education and Outreach . 7Partnerships . 8Recommended Changes to Statutes. 9Objectives for 2017 . 91

LETF Five-Year REPORT (2012-2016)The mission of the Labor Enforcement Task Force (LETF) is to combat the underground economy in orderto ensure safe working conditions and proper payment of wages for workers, create an environment inwhich legitimate businesses can thrive, and support the collection of all California taxes, fees, andpenalties due from employers. Task force members include the following: Labor & Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), including Division of Labor Standards Enforcement(DLSE) and the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) Employment Development Department (EDD) Contractors State License Board (CSLB) California Department of Insurance (CDI) Board of Equalization (BOE) Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) State Attorney General and district attorneys throughout CaliforniaBeginning in January 2012, DIR assumed responsibility for administering the newly formed LETF.Executive and strategic operations teams were established to plan, evaluate, and monitor the program.This report covers activities for calendar years 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016.A. Targeting Methods: Value Added by the LETFLETF is tasked with ensuring efficacy, resource maximization, and the avoidance of overlap in agencyenforcement. Targeted inspections are the most effective approach for meeting these centralobjectives. To accurately target noncompliant businesses, DIR continually refines its methods, which areboth data driven (proactive) and complaint driven (responsive).LETF teams include different strategic combinations of inspection staff from the member agencies listedabove, depending on the industry. On its own, each agency does not have access to the full range ofdata and other information that the LETF teams can access collectively: DLSE uses wage claim data, Bureau of Field Enforcement (BOFE) data, and contacts with localdistrict attorneys and community-based organizations. Cal/OSHA uses contacts with the local Agricultural Commissioner’s office, the local USDepartment of Agriculture’s office, and community-based organizations. EDD uses complaint data and their Automated Collection Enhancement System (ACES) thatincludes multiple databases, including tax and DMV records. Their data on taxpayers areprotected by federal privacy laws. CSLB uses complaint data, licensing data, and contacts with industry partners.In addition, DIR receives complaints and tips submitted directly by the public to identify potentialtargets. The public may report through the LETF hotline, the LETF online referral form, or the LETF email2

address, as provided online at targeting protocol involves a multiphase process that all inspectors follow. Teams identify potentialtargets and conduct research to develop a business profile. Lists of potential targets are sent to EDD forscreening to learn if the employer is registered with EDD and to determine how many employees theemployer has reported. The target lists are screened through the Workers’ Compensation InsuranceRating Bureau (WCIRB) to determine if the employer is adequately insured. In addition, LETF screensbusiness names using other agency databases to match on a variety of fields that may indicate areas ofnoncompliance. The results are added to the business profile and used to prepare inspectors for jointenforcement action.Prior to the joint inspections, teams conduct physical surveillance to confirm the information obtained inthe targeting process and gather additional information. Physical surveillance can include both visualexamination from a distant location and on-site visits to the premises.As illustrated in Figure 1, LETF continues to improve the effectiveness of targeted joint enforcement byfocusing on inspecting noncompliant businesses. In 2016 LETF found that an average 91% of businessesinspected each month were out of compliance by at least one LETF partner agency. This percentage hassteadily increased since LETF’s inception in 2012 demonstrating the efficacy of targeted, jointinspections. Figure 1 shows results only from LETF joint targeted inspections and does not reflect anupward trend in noncompliance in the overall business community.Figure 1: Average Percentage of Inspected Businesses Found out of Compliance per Year, 2012 12320152016

B. Joint Enforcement Activity: Value Added by the LETFWorking together with combined authority, LETF teams have access to a fuller range of enforcementtools than does each agency on its own: DLSE has the authority under Labor Code section 90 to access all places of employment. OtherLETF partners do not have this full authority. DLSE may also issue stop orders requiringemployers to cease illegal operations immediately. Cal/OSHA has the authority to issue citations for serious, willful, and repeat (SWR) violations.Cal/OSHA may also issue an order prohibiting use where a condition or practice exists thatcreates an imminent hazard to the safety and health of employees. EDD has authority under Section 1092 of the California Unemployment Insurance Code torequire employers to provide records for inspection at any time during the employing unit’sbusiness hours. CSLB is able to suspend contractors’ licenses until penalties issued by DLSE and state payrolltaxes, penalties, and interest due to EDD are paid or formal arrangements have been made topay off the liability due in installments. Penalties are far more likely to be paid promptly whenthe license is suspended until payment is made.Joint enforcement has two key comparative advantages for the business community. First, because LETFinspection teams comprise members from multiple agencies, one LETF inspection has less impact onbusiness operations than multiple separate inspections by the individual agencies. Second, when severalagencies, working together, find egregious employer misconduct, the ensuing publicity has a deterrenteffect that is much more powerful than that of a single agency’s enforcement.Tables 1–6 show enforcement results by year for all the member agencies:Table 1. Cal/OSHA ResultsBusinesses 4,168% Businesses Out of77%78%86%89%93%84%ComplianceOrder Prohibiting Use1514122644111(OPU)Total Number of1,9162,6742,7793,1572,73613,262Violations% of Total Violations16%16%30%15%15%18%That Were Serious37%40%31%% of Programmed20%29%29%Inspections w/SWRViolationsInitial Assessment 1,265,383 1,721,643 1,317,020 2,450,633 2,472,166 9,226,845Amounts*Totals for 2016 do not reflect information for 212 inspections that are still pending citation issuance.4

Table 2. DLSE ResultsBusiness InspectedBusinesses Out ofCompliance% Businesses Out ofComplianceNumber of Workers’CompensationInsurance ViolationsNumber of Child LaborViolationsNumber of DeductionStatement ViolationsNumber of MinimumWage ViolationsNumber of OvertimeViolationsNumber of GarmentViolationsNumber of Contractor’sLicense (1021/1021.5)ViolationsNumber of GarmentRegistration ViolationsNumber of Car WashRegistration ViolationsNumber of Rest PeriodViolationsNumber of Meal PeriodViolationsNumber of Split ShiftViolationsNumber ofMisclassificationViolationsNumber of UnlicensedFarm Labor Contractor(1683) ViolationsTotal Number ofViolationsAssessment 0506807896994,004 7,232,786 9,346,759 5,784,431 7,369,656 5,605,370 35,339,00252016

Table 3. EDD d1,1271,0698239058814,805% of edWages** 102,348,344 197,129,983 113,554,258 110,546,059 169,289,090 ,8952,4843,14514,5391732145044403811,712 6,756,275 6,414,504 12,473,729 11,935,391 12,016,208 d on Closed LETF Cases. **Closed LETF Leads.Table 4. CSLB Results2012*2013201420152016TotalBusinesses Inspected6075834105163262,442% Businesses Out ofCompliance44%36%30%41%31%37% 369,950 438,650 412,000 141,400 108,300 1,470,300Civil Penalties Assessed*Totals for 2012 followed different methodology than totals for the other years, which both reflect joint inspectionresults when CSLB partnered with at least one other LETF enforcement partner.Table 5. BAR ResultsBusinesses Inspected% Businesses Out 957%45%62%17%17%36%6

Table 6. BOE Results20122013201420152016TotalBusinesses Inspected3683361121662081,190% Businesses Out ofCompliance43%33%53%31%26%36%C. Education and OutreachLETF uses multiple education and outreach methods to ensure that employers know theirresponsibilities and workers know their rights.LETF initiated a statewide program in collaboration with UC Berkeley to achieve the following: Design and produce effective educational materials for workers and employers in coordinationwith other agencies Translate educational materials into the languages commonly spoken by employers andemployees in specific low-wage industries across California Inform and train local and regional organizations serving low-wage workers using enhancedmaterials and industry-specific information Publicize the campaign and enforcement efforts via speaking engagements, press releases,website features, television, radio, email news releases, and newspapers, as well as socialmedia, such as Facebook and Twitter.LETF educational materials inform workers of their rights and help employers understand theirresponsibilities. The booklet “All Workers Have Rights in California” is available in English, Spanish,Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese and covers topics such as minimum wages and overtime, rest andmeal breaks, workplace safety and health, and benefits for those injured or unemployed. LETF has alsoproduced fact sheets to help employers understand and follow labor, licensing, and payroll tax laws. Thefact sheets have been designed for employers in specific industries, including agriculture, automotive,construction, garment, landscaping, and restaurants.Printable and mobile versions of these materials for workers and employers are now available. Themobile versions are readable on smartphones and mobile devices. All the LETF educational materials areavailable at the LETF website: for workers and employers.html.LETF and its partners are involved in a wide range of outreach and educational events. Partners from UCBerkeley and community-based-organizations hold regular workshops and training sessions to educateunrepresented workers in the underground economy on their rights. LETF representatives from multiplepartner agencies participated in 16 events in 2016 hosted by industry associations and employer groups.7

At these events, LETF representatives answered questions from employers, explained the widespreadimpact of the underground economy, and provided guidance on how employers can comply with labor,health and safety, licensing, and payroll tax laws.DIR is making continuous improvements to the LETF website, including translating the website intoSpanish at and launching the LETF online ral.asp. The public can now use this online form,available in English and Spanish, to report leads to LETF on activity in the underground economy.D. PartnershipsThe LETF/JESF Collaborative Enforcement PartnershipTo help combat California’s underground economy and protect workers’ rights, the Department ofIndustrial Relations (DIR) and the Employment Development Department (EDD) have joined effortsthrough their respective enforcement programs, namely, the Labor Enforcement Task Force (LETF) andthe Joint Enforcement Strike Force (JESF), to coordinate activity and share effective strategies.The LETF/JESF Collaborative Enforcement Partnership merges best practices based on a wide range ofexperiences and innovation. The joint effort draws upon both program’s respective strengths throughtraining, refinement of targeting methods, and strategic planning. While LETF and JESF remain under theguidance of their respective agencies, enforcement coordination has allowed a streamlining ofadministration to leverage resources and mitigate overlap. The results include broader statewideoperations, stronger communications, and knowledgeable, cross-trained staff.DIR hosted the third annual LETF/JESF joint training session in 2016; investigators and supervisors fromaround the state came together to share best practices on joint enforcement operations. Additionally, in2016, DIR hosted a series of webinar training sessions for LETF and JESF staff.Operation UndergroundOn May 18, 2016, LETF and JESF participated in “Operation Underground,” a statewide outreach andenforcement effort led by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to target the undergroundeconomy. LETF and JESF teams inspected 19 businesses and assessed approximately 80,000 in fines asa result of this one-day operation. LETF Cal/OSHA inspectors issued one Order Prohibiting Use (OPU) foran unguarded wood-chipping machine at a trimming operation. After the OPU has been issued, theequipment or machinery cannot be used again until the hazards have been abated and Cal/OSHA hasgiven its approval. LETF and JESF DLSE inspectors issued three stop orders to employers that had noworkers’ compensation insurance for their employees. For more information on OperationUnderground, please see the press release on the CDI website: leases/2016/release049-16.cfm.8

E. Recommended Changes to StatutesThough LETF does not currently have any active plans for legislation, Task Force partners arecontinuously looking for ways to improve effectiveness and interagency collaboration.F. Objectives for 2017Objectives for 2017 include the following:1. Expand outreach and education, as discussed in section C above. LETF will continue to work withpartners to raise awareness among vulnerable workers in the underground economy about their rights.Additionally, LETF seeks to promote compliance by partnering with employer groups and educatingemployers from multiple industries of their responsibilities.2. Use data matching to prioritize incoming leads and tips. LETF will continue to refine data matchingtechniques and targeting protocols in order to streamline interagency collaboration, target the mostegregious violators, and maximize resources.3. Increase engagement with community partners.

Senator Patricia C. Bates Senator Jean Fuller Senator Ricardo Lara Senator Bill Monning Senator Jim Nelson Senator Richard Pan Senator Nancy Skinner . Assembly Member Philip Y. Ting (Vice Chair) Assembly Member Dr. Joaquin Arambula Assembly Member Richard Bloom . Assembly Member Rocky J. Chavez Assembly Member Kevin McCarty