Leading For Change A Blueprint For Cultural Diversity And .

3y ago
3.13 MB
44 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 4m ago
Upload by : Oscar Steel

Leading for ChangeA blueprint for cultural diversityand inclusive leadership revisitedApril 2018

Australian Human Rights Commission 2018.The Australian Human Rights Commission encourages the dissemination and exchange of information presented in this publicationand endorses the use of the Australian Governments Open Access and Licensing Framework (AusGOAL).All material presented in this publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence, with theexception of: photographs and images; the Commission’s logo, any branding or trademarks; where otherwise indicated.To view a copy of this licence, visit de.In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the publication, as long as you attribute the Australian Human RightsCommission and abide by the other licence terms.Please give attribution to: Australian Human Rights Commission 2018.Leading for Change: A blueprint for cultural diversity and inclusive leadership revisitedISBN 978-1-921449-89-5

LEADING FOR CHANGEA blueprint for cultural diversityand inclusive leadership revisited


PrefaceIn 2016 the Leading for Change report highlighted the lack of cultural diversityrepresented within the senior leadership positions in Australian business, politics,government and universities. It challenged us to do better in making the most of thetalents in our multicultural nation.We have revisited the Leading for Change exercise for a number of reasons. SinceAustralia does not yet officially collect comprehensive data on cultural diversitywithin organisations and institutions, independent research is crucial to ensuring weknow the state of play. We also believe it is important to highlight what leaders andorganisations are doing to support cultural diversity and inclusion.We hope this report challenges readers to think deeply about cultural diversity.Ultimately, we hope it will be used by leaders and organisations as a blueprint foraction – because our national success and prosperity depends on us getting themost from our multicultural talents.Dr Tim SoutphommasaneRace Discrimination Commissioner,Australian Human Rights CommissionProfessor Greg WhitwellDean,The University of Sydney Business SchoolKate JordanChair, Professional and Business Services Taskforce,The Committee for SydneyPhilipp IvanovChief Executive Officer,Asia Society AustraliaApril 2018

ContentsExecutive summary01Figures1. Introduction03Figure 1: Australia’s population bycultural background072. Methodology04Figure 2: Cultural Backgrounds of Senior Leaders inAustralian Organisations08Figure 3: Cultural Backgrounds of Chief Executives09Figure 4: Cultural Backgrounds of Senior ExecutiveManagement11Figure 5: The Business Case for Cultural Diversity15Figure 6: Leadership, systems and culture162.1 C ultural backgroundand classification3. Findings04073.1 The Australian population073.2 S enior leaders of Australianorganisations073.3 Chief executives and equivalents093.4 S enior executive management(non-chief executive ‘C-suite’)114. Not just a matter of time135. Leadership, systems and culture155.1 Leadership165.2 Systems185.2.1 Data185.2.2 Accountability215.3 Culture23Table 1: Cultural Backgrounds of Senior Leaders inAustralian Organisations (Chief Executivesand Other ‘C-Suite’ Leaders)08Table 2: Cultural Backgrounds of Chief Executives09Table 3: Cultural Backgrounds of CEOsand equivalents - 201810Table 4: Cultural Backgrounds of CEOsand equivalents - 201610Table 5: Cultural Backgrounds of Senior ExecutiveManagement (non-chief executive‘C-suite’)11Table 6: Cultural Backgrounds of CEOsand equivalents125.3.1 Bias and discrimination23Case Studies5.3.2 Professional development25Case Study 1: L eadership Council onCultural Diversity19Case Study 2: Department of the Prime Ministerand Cabinet20Case Study 3: Law firms216. Challenges286.1 Ethnic zoning and visibility286.2 D ealing with deflectionsand hostility297. Tables34Case Study 4: DeloitteCase Study 5: Department of Foreign Affairsand Trade23Case Study 6: Commonwealth Bank of Australia25Case Study 7: The University of Sydney26Case Study 8: Clayton Utz27Case Study 9: Australian Broadcasting Corporation27Case Study 10: Cultural Diversity andLeadership Fellowship29Case Study 11: Special Broadcasting Service29

Executive summaryof the population have a non-Europeanbackground, and 3 per cent of the populationhave an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander(Indigenous) background.This study builds on the Leading for Changereport of 2016, which provided a snapshotof the cultural diversity represented in thesenior leadership of Australian organisationsand institutions.Our study examines the cultural backgrounds ofchief executive officers of ASX 200 companies,federal ministers, heads of federal and stategovernment departments, and vice-chancellorsof universities. It also examines the culturalbackgrounds of senior management at thelevel directly below chief executives andequivalent – namely, group executives of ASX200 companies, elected members of theCommonwealth Parliament, deputy heads ofgovernment departments and deputy vicechancellors of universities.We adopt a classification that includes four widegroups of cultural backgrounds, which was firstused in the Leading for Change report (2016): Indigenous background; Anglo-Celtic background; European background; andThis cultural diversity is significantly underrepresented among senior leaders in Australianorganisations and institutions.Of those who occupy 2490 of the most seniorposts in Australia, 75.9 per cent have anAnglo-Celtic background, 19.0 per cent have aEuropean background, 4.7 per cent have a nonEuropean background and 0.4 per cent have anIndigenous background.Described another way, about 95 per centof senior leaders in Australia have an AngloCeltic or European background. Althoughthose who have non-European and Indigenousbackgrounds make up an estimated 24 per centof the Australian population, such backgroundsaccount for only 5 per cent of senior leaders.Cultural diversity is particularly low within thesenior leadership of Australian governmentdepartments and Australian universities.Of the 372 chief executives and equivalentsidentified in this study, we find that 76.9 percent of chief executives have an Anglo-Celticbackground, 20.1 per cent have a Europeanbackground, and 2.7 per cent have a nonEuropean background. There is one chiefexecutive who has an Indigenous background(0.3 per cent). non-European background.Using statistical modelling based on the 2016Census, we estimate that 58 per cent of thepopulation have an Anglo-Celtic background.An estimated 18 per cent of the populationhave a European background, 21 per centCultural Backgrounds of Senior Leaders in Australian Organisations (Chief Executives andOther ‘C-Suite’ Leaders)NumberPercentage ofsenior leadersPercentage ofAustralian populationPercentage over/underrepresentation ( /-)189075.958 17.9European47419.018 1.0Non-European1164.721-16.3100.43-2.6Cultural backgroundAnglo-CelticIndigenousTotal2490Leading for Change 01

The pattern of cultural representation withinthe cohort of chief executives and equivalentsbroadly tracks that of the total group of2490 senior leaders in this study. The level ofnon-European background representation,however, is substantially lower (2.7 per centcompared to 4.7 per cent). There is a combinedtotal of 11 chief executives who have a nonEuropean or Indigenous background – or3.0 per cent of the total 372 chief executives.Put another way, 97 per cent of chief executiveshave an Anglo-Celtic or European background.This is a dismal statistic for a society that pridesitself on its multiculturalism.It challenges Australia’s egalitarian self-image.It also challenges Australia as a nation whoseprosperity relies upon international trade, capitalinflows and mobility of people.It would be complacent to believe that it willonly be a matter of time before cultural diversityis better represented. There remains limitedcultural diversity that appears in the leadershippipeline, as demonstrated by our findingsregarding non-chief executive senior leaders.Getting serious about the issue demands thatleaders and organisations take committedaction in three areas: leadership, systems andculture. We reiterate the general guidanceoutlined in Leading for Change (2016), whichcan be summarised as below.There is one general area where efforts canbe strengthened on cultural diversity. Theexperience of gender equality has demonstratedthe power of having data and reporting ongender. If we are committed to deepening oursuccess as a multicultural society, there must beconsideration of official collection and reportingof comprehensive data on cultural diversitywithin Australian organisations and institutions.Cultural Backgrounds of Chief Executives and equivalentsNumberPercentage ofsenior leadersPercentage ofAustralian populationPercentage over/underrepresentation ( /-)28676.958 18.9European7520.118 2.1Non-European102.721-18.310.33-2.7Cultural 1. Provide leadership on cultural diversity that is authentic and humble2. Equip and support leaders from diverse backgrounds to be role models3. Leaders must be prepared to respond to deflections and backlashSystems1. Collect meaningful data on cultural diversity2. Accompany any data initiative with deeper conversations about cultural differences3. Where there is data, consider targets and accountability for cultural diversity and inclusionacross the organisationCulture1. Mitigate bias and discrimination by promoting positive contact between different culturalbackgrounds2. Unlock the potential of multicultural talent through targeted professional development3. Go beyond cultural celebration and cultivate organisational resilience in negotiatingcultural differences02

1. IntroductionAustralia is widely celebrated as a multiculturaltriumph, but any such success remainsincomplete. There remains significant underrepresentation of cultural diversity in the seniorleadership of Australian organisations. Oursociety does not yet appear to be making themost of its diverse talents.Doing so is important, not only as a naturalprogression of our multiculturalism, but alsobecause it is necessary. Australia needs adiversity of ideas, capabilities and culturalintelligence to navigate technological, social,economic and geopolitical changes.In 2016, for the first time, research provided astatistical snapshot of the cultural diversity ofsenior leaders in business, politics, governmentand higher education. As published in Leadingfor Change: A Blueprint for Cultural Diversity andInclusive Leadership, the story was an unhappyone. There was an almost total absence of nonEuropean backgrounds represented among thecohort of chief executives in Australia.During the past two years, more attention hasbeen devoted to getting cultural diversity right.There is growing recognition that efforts ondiversity and inclusion have focused primarilyon gender, and have downplayed or ignoredculture and race. This is a welcome, thoughoverdue, development.At the same time, concerns about culturaldiversity are still often assimilated intodiscussions about gender diversity. Forexample, while there are some similarities inthe obstacles for greater gender and culturaldiversity in leadership, the issues are by nomeans identical. There is a need to givededicated time and energy to cultural diversityin its own right.This report provides an updated overview of therepresentation of cultural diversity in the seniorleadership of Australian organisations. Applyingand updating the methodology used in Leadingfor Change (2016), it gives a breakdown of thecultural diversity of the two most senior tiers ofsenior management within the ASX 200 groupof listed companies, Commonwealth and Stategovernment departments and universities. Thereport also provides statistics for the culturaldiversity of the Australian Parliament.The findings of this report suggest we have along way to go before realising the full potentialof our multicultural population. If progress isbeing made on cultural diversity, it remains slow.We reiterate that improving the representation ofcultural diversity requires action at three levels:leadership, systems and culture. Through aseries of case studies drawn from Australianorganisations’ experience, we highlightexamples of how such concrete steps canbe taken.This report does not purport to provide anexhaustive treatment of cultural diversityand leadership. It aims, though, to provide areference point for understanding how we arefaring. This includes providing a classificationthat can assist in discussing cultural diversity.This report also aims to provide some thematicguidance to organisations, in light of currentdebates. In addition to the inherent challenge ofdealing with race and culture, a contemporarybacklash against diversity might also impedeprogress. In the United States, Britain andEurope, political debates have exhibited ahardening of sentiments against immigration andmulticulturalism. This has been accompanied bynotable campaigns against diversity initiativeswithin workplaces, including within Silicon Valley.There are signs that such sentiments may alsobe gaining strength here in Australia.None of this gives us a reason to abandoncultural diversity. The fact that something is hardto do does not in any way mean that it is not theright thing to do. But it does mean advocatesfor cultural diversity must be prepared to updatetheir thinking and reinvigorate their language.Leading for Change 03

2. MethodologyOur study examined the cultural backgrounds ofchief executive officers of ASX 200 companies,federal government ministers, heads of federaland state government departments, and vicechancellors of universities. It also examined thecultural backgrounds of senior managementat the level directly below chief executivesand equivalent – namely, group executives ofASX 200 companies, elected members of theCommonwealth Parliament, deputy heads ofgovernment departments and deputy vicechancellors of universities.1These cohorts were chosen to illustrate therepresentation of cultural diversity amongleaders in business, politics, government (publicservice) and civil society.2.1 Cultural backgroundand classificationWe consider cultural background to referprimarily to a person’s ethnicity and ancestry.The concept of ethnicity can be understoodto relate to a human group or population thathas a common origin, and which may exhibitshared defining features such as homeland,language, customs, historical tradition, religionand physical appearance.2 We regard ancestry –a person’s descent and family background – asinextricably tied to ethnicity.Our study adopts a classification that includes fourwide groups of cultural backgrounds, which wasfirst used in the Leading for Change report (2016):1. Indigenous background;2. Anglo-Celtic background;3. European background; and4. non-European background.04The use of this classification, and the way inwhich cultural backgrounds are grouped, doesnot imply the expression of an opinion on thepart of the authors about the recognition ofsuch backgrounds by governments or thestatus accorded to them. It does not implythat there are only four ways in which people’scultural backgrounds can be expressed orcaptured – using this classification does nothingto prevent or deny people from expressingtheir cultural background or heritage. We usethis classification simply as a conceptual aidto understanding the representation of culturaldiversity. It provides a means of aggregatingcultural backgrounds in a way that permits moresophisticated analysis than otherwise possible.The meaning of the classification can beexplained in the following way.‘Indigenous’ designates those who have anAboriginal or Torres Strait Islander culturalbackground.‘Anglo-Celtic’ describes those culturalbackgrounds that are English, Scottish, Welshand Irish.3 ‘European’ includes all Europeanbackgrounds other than Anglo-Celtic – includingNorth-West European (e.g. German, French,Dutch) and Southern and Eastern European(e.g. Italian, Greek, Polish).‘Non-European’ encompasses all other culturalbackgrounds, including South-East Asian(e.g. Vietnamese, Malaysian), North-East Asian(e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Korean), Southern andCentral Asian (e.g. Indian, Sri-Lankan, Afghani),Latin American (e.g. Mexican, Colombian),Middle Eastern and North African (e.g. Egyptian,Turkish), Sub-Saharan African (e.g. Nigerian,Zimbabwean) and Oceanic and Pacific Islander(e.g. Maori, Tongan).4

The use of any such categories necessarilyreflects the history of a particular society andthe preponderance of groups within it. Webelieve the above four categories – Indigenous,Anglo-Celtic, European, non-European – areappropriate in light of Australia’s demographichistory. In particular, they reflect the main wavesof immigration that have primarily shaped thecomposition of Australian society today.For some 60 000 years Australia was solelyoccupied by Aboriginal and Torres StraitIslander peoples, until the arrival of the FirstFleet in 1788. With the colonisation of Australia,the population would become predominantlyBritish (English, Scottish, Welsh) and Irishin background. Scholars refer to Australiannational identity being shaped during its colonialera by an ‘Anglo-Celtic’ hybrid culture.5Such composition in the Australian colonialpopulation was reinforced by cumulativeimmigration from the British Isles. Significantnumbers of Chinese and other immigrantsarrived during the gold rushes in the second halfof the 19th century; there would also be manythousands of Pacific Islander workers who cameto Australia as indentured labourers in the 19thcentury, largely in Queensland. But immigrationrestrictions imposed by colonial and later theCommonwealth governments meant the culturalimpact of such immigration – namely, of nonAnglo-Celtic origin – was limited.The maintenance of the White Australia policyfor most of the 20th century meant thatimmigration was mainly from the British Isles –that is, until the post-Second World War period.The 1950s and 60s were years when significantnumbers of immigrants from Europe settled inAustralia. This would inject a new (non-AngloCeltic) European cultural component to theAustralian population.The next waves of immigration have been of anon-European origin, with the formal dismantlingof the White Australia policy in 1973, and thearrival of refugees following the conclusion ofthe Vietnam War and related strife in Cambodiaand Laos.The late 1970s and early 1980s saw some70 000 Indochinese refugees resettled inAustralia, with many more thousands of theserefugees’ relatives arriving in later years throughfamily reunion programs. This has also beenaccompanied by the arrival of immigrants fromother countries in Asia, as well as the MiddleEast, South America and Africa.62.2 Our process of classificationIn determining the cultural backgroundof Australian leaders in business, politics,government, and higher education, weexamined the following:a. publicly available biographical informationabout the individual (e.g. organisation websiteand Who’s Who entry);b. other relevant public statements that mayinclude information about the individual’scultural background (e.g. speeches andmedia reports);a. an individual’s full name and its origins;b. an individual’s place of birth; andc. photographs of the individual.Where possible, we have sought to findreferences to ancestry and cultural backgroundgoing back as far back as two generations (thatis, to a person’s grandparents). After gatheringthe available data, we then placed leaders’cultural backgrounds into one of the fourcategories: Indigenous, Anglo-Celtic, European,non-European.Such a methodology is consistent withac

Case Studies Case Study 1: Leadership Council on Cultural Diversity 19 Case Study 2: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 20 Case Study 3: Law firms 21 Case Study 4: Deloitte Case Study 5: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 23 Case Study 6: Commonwealth Bank of Australia 25 Case Study 7: The University of Sydney 26 Case Study 8 .

Related Documents:

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid

LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .

This presentation and SAP's strategy and possible future developments are subject to change and may be changed by SAP at any time for any reason without notice. This document is 7 provided without a warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a .

projects identified in the previous Blueprint, the Blueprint for Action 2014-2017. A statistical analysis of sexual assault and domestic violence crime data from 20142016- is included as part of the Blueprint Report. Looking forward, the Blueprint for Progress provides scopes of work for the goals and tasking the next three years, 2017of -2020.

The stock market profits blueprint has been hand crafted to enable you to understand all the factors that play on the stock market. It is called a blueprint because a blueprint is in effect an architectural document to show how something is designed. The Blueprint will show you a powerful way to envisage how the stock market and the stock market