Nce Upon A Time . . . After Billions Of Years . . . A Frog .

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
1.24 MB
16 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Esmeralda Toy
Transcription

O nce upon a time . . . after billions of years . . . a frog became manFairytales,Faith & FoolsTHE ONLY TRUE GODJANUARY 2008by DAVE HUNT

NEW! YOGA AND THE BODY OF CHRIST RADIO BROADCASTSearch the Scriptures Daily : Dave Hunt and T.A. McMahon discuss thegrowing trend of Yoga and the spiritual dangers involvedHunt/McMahon—From4 Compact Discswt .4 18.00fast-food franchise promo- CD132tion to virtual video-game1 MP3 Discwt .3 9.00venues, yoga is revolution- MP3132izing the fitness movementworldwide—and is even Yoga and the Body of Christextending its reach directly Hunt—Is yoga simply stretching, as some Christiansinto the churches and the claim? Is it a way to “breathe in” the Holy Spirit? Orlifestyles of professing Christians. But is it simply stretching, as some is yoga one of the greatest Trojan Horses of our time?Christians claim? Is it a way to “breathe in” the Holy Spirit? Or is yoga Promising to bring peace, healing, and wholeness (evenone of the greatest Trojan Horses of our time? Promising to bring peace, prosperity!) to its practitioners, readers will be shockedhealing, and wholeness (even prosperity!) to its practitioners, readers to discover what yoga truly is. Thewill be shocked to discover that yoga is, in fact, based on the worship author—an avid promoter of biblicallyof (and prepares participants for supernatural connection with) unholy based physical, mental, and spiritualspirits that manifest in extraordinary and dangerous ways. Every Chris- wholeness—distinguishes pure truthfrom popular belief in this revealingtian should be informed of the true origins and effects of the practice ofexposé. The Berean Call, 175 pp.yoga and its ungodly roots in Kundalini energy—which, literally defined,wt .5 9.00means an awakening of the “Serpent Power.” This fascinating compila- B60487tion from Search the Scriptures Daily Radio will encourage listeners tolook to God’s Word—and toward heaven—for Christ’s imminent return.Get the book FREE withThe Berean Call, Runtime: 4.3-hours.purchase of audio set!NEW! WILLIAM TYNDALE DVD & TOZER EDITIONSGodʼs Outlaw — The story of William TyndaleGrenville Film Productions—Asimple God-seeking man, WilliamTyndale somehow became oneof the most wanted men in England and all of Europe. Pursued byKing Henry VIII, Lord Chancellor SirThomas More, and the Pope’s personallegate Cardinal Wolsey, he darted acrossEurope to avoid capture—always pushingto complete the task that obsessed him. Thetask was translating the Bible into English and publishing it for his fellow countrymen—Englishmenwho lived in a country where the Bible and even prayers in English were outlawed by a harsh and rigid religious establishment.Today he is renowned as “the father of the English Bible” and isrecognized as one of the major leaders of the English Reformation. But the tale of how he lived and died as “God’s Outlaw” isa compelling “rest-of-the-story” and is a moving encouragementfor modern people of faith.SPECIAL FEATURES: Available in English, Spanish, Portuguese andKorean, with or without English subtitles. Abridged version, withcommentary. Christian History magizine article and more!DVD1631 DVD disc—93 minuteswt .3 20.00The Pursuit of GodTozer—Whether you are thirsting for more of God or do not yetknow of the “mighty longing after God” that so consumed A.W.Tozer’s life and ministry, The Pursuit of God will draw you into adeep, abiding relationship with the One who “nourishes the soul.”This spiritual masterpiece exposes the roadblocks that keep usfrom fully knowing God. Wing Spread Publishers, 121 pp.B93663wt .4 11.00Godʼs Pursuit of ManTozer—Although written two years after the publication of ThePursuit of God, A.W. Tozer’s God’s Pursuit of Man sets forththe biblical truth that before man can pursue God, God mustfirst pursue man. A “prequel” of sorts, God’s Pursuit of Manspeaks fervently of God’s desire for man to be saved and theaction He takes as He “invades” the human soul. Wing SpreadPublishers, 160 pp.B07049wt .5 11.00COVER ART: James Perloff put it well: “But remember; ʻThe princesskissed the frog, and he turned into a handsome prince.ʼ We call thata fairy tale. Evolution says frogs turn into princes, and we call itscience.Is that science? Or is it, like the fraud of Piltdown Man, theforgeries of Haeckelʼs embryos, the misrepresentations of Inherit theWind, and the coercions of the Supreme Court, merely part of a longeffort to deny God?” Atheists who end up in hell cannot blame God,who declares in his word that they are without excuse. (Rom. 1:20)

THE BEREANCALL“[The Bereans] . . . searched the scriptures daily, [to see] whether those things were so.” —ACTS 17:11WWW.THEBEREANCALL.ORGThe Only True GodDave HuntAs we all know, the “Lord’s prayer” wasnever prayed by our Lord. It was a pattern forprayer: “After this manner therefore pray ye:Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed bethy name.” (Mt 6:9). To repeat these wordsover and over (instead of using them as apattern for prayer from the heart) would beto disobey our Lord and to engage in what Hestrictly forbade: “vain repetition” (6:7).Certainly this prayer is only for those whoknow God as their heavenly Father. It is agrievous error common to pseudo-Christianity to assume the universal Fatherhood ofGod and brotherhood of man. The typicalUnity church service, for example, includesthis affirmation repeated in unison, “I am achild of God and therefore I do not inheritsickness.” Such “positive confessions” haveled multitudes astray. Paul declared that webecome “the children of God by faith inChrist Jesus” (Gal 3:26).The fact that this relationship with Godas one’s Father does not come by naturalbirth is clear. To those who boasted of being“Abraham’s children,” Christ countered,“Ye are of your father the devil, and thelusts of your father ye will do” (Jn 8:44). Therebellion of Adam and Eve, by which theybecame the followers of Satan as “the godof this world” (2 Cor 4:4), made the devil thepatriarch of mankind.That is why Christ told Nicodemus,“Except a man be born again, he cannot seethe kingdom of God” (Jn 3:3). This spiritualbirth is an absolute requirement, allowing noexceptions. No one will be in heaven whohas not been “born again,” both “of waterand of the Spirit” (v. 5).There is a common abuse of this prayeramong American athletic teams. A highpercentage of teams across America (especially in high school football) pray the“Lord’s Prayer” either before or after games.Attitudes of participants vary from skepticism, to suppressed ridicule, to a shruggingacquiescence to something that might nowand then bring “good luck.” This Americantradition is an abomination to God.Phil Jackson, one of the most successfulcoaches in NBA history, turned from thePentecostalism in which his co-pastorparents raised him to Zen Buddhism and theoccultism of Lakota Indian “spirituality.”Yet he still repeats the “Lord’s prayer” andhas for years encouraged his teams to do— VOL. XXIIINO. 1 —so without knowing God or Christ. Thisunbiblical practice has been one of Satan’smajor tools of deception.Confusion reigns over what it meansto be “born again.” The teaching is rathercommon that Christ’s words, “of water,”refer to the protective amniotic water sacthat breaks in natural birth, while “of theSpirit” refers to being born of the Spirit ofGod at the second birth. The latter is true,but the former is false.Everyone enters via the amniotic fluid intothe human race. “Born of water” must meanmore than that. It would be redundant to saythat in order to be born again one must havealready been born once. Furthermore, thatdoctrine would place an unbiblical restriction upon entrance into heaven! Such aproposition would mean that there would beno salvation for anyone who had not experienced natural birth. Thus no fetus that died bywhatever means before coming to full-termdelivery could be considered a real personeligible for the second birth and heaven, thusallowing abortion at any stage.The biblical teaching of the “new birth”(becoming a “born-again” Christian) hascaused much controversy. Roman Catholics, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and othersbelieve this occurs at baptism. As previouslynoted (see TBC 8/04), every Lutheran churchfollows Luther’s Small Catechism. Atbaptism (usually as a baby), one receives acertificate stating, “In baptism full salvationhas been given unto you; God has becomeyour Father, and you have become His childthrough this act.”In fact, the Bible teaches that baptism(like the “Lord’s prayer”) is only for thosewho have believed the gospel. Baptism testifies to the faith by which one was born again.Otherwise it is meaningless. Infant baptismdefies Scripture, denies the gospel, and is amajor net by which “the god of this world”gathers multitudes into his kingdom, providing them with false assurance that preventsthem from seeing their need to receive Christas Savior and Lord.How could a church defend baptizing aninfant that cannot understand or believe? Itwas necessary to claim some efficacy, as theCatechisms say, “in this act of baptism.”This occult lie of spiritual power innate inand released by baptism, burning a candleor incense, doing rituals, priestly handmotions, voice tones, etc., has been forthousands of years the essence of ritualmagic, witchcraft, paganism, etc., whichanthropologists now call shamanism.JANUARY 2008This pernicious delusion is also known assacramentalism—a heresy so vital to RomanCatholicism that it has its own Latin term:ex opere operato (i.e., “in the act itself”). Todeny this doctrine concerning any officialsacrament is to deny Roman Catholicism,for which the penalty is automatic excommunication (tantamount to being sentencedto hell). Here it is from The Canons andDecrees of the Council of Trent: SEVENTHSESSION.third day of March, 1547, DECREECONCERNING THE SACRAMENTS.CANONS ONTHE SACRAMENTS IN GENERAL [still in fullforce]:Can. 4. If anyone says that the sacramentsof the New Law are not necessary for salvation but.that without them or withoutthe desire of them men obtain from Godthrough faith alone the grace of justification.let him be anathema.Can. 8. If anyone says that by the sacraments of the New Law grace is notconferred ex opere operato, but that faithalone in the divine promise is sufficient toobtain grace, let him be anathema.The grievous heresy of sacramentalismcontinues to seduce in various forms most“Reformed” churches. R.C. Sproul, forexample, justifies infant baptism by likeningit to circumcision: “The scriptural case forbaptizing believers’ infants rests on the parallel between [O.T.] circumcision and N.T.baptism as signs and seals of the covenantof grace.The Old Testament precedentrequires it” (Geneva Study Bible, p. 38).The Ethiopian to whom Philip had justpreached Christ from Isaiah 53 (Acts 8:29-35)asked, “See, here is water; what doth hinderme to be baptized? And Philip said, If thoubelievest with all thine heart, thou mayest”(8:36,37). Philip then baptized him—not bysprinkling or pouring water over him but,obviously, by immersion, for “they wentdown both into the water” (v. 38). Baptismpublicly declares one’s faith, identifying thebeliever with Christ in His death, burial, andresurrection. One does not sprinkle dirt on acorpse. One buries it.If “born of water” does not refer toamniotic fluid or to baptism, what could itmean? The second birth is by the Spirit ofGod and by water (Jn 3:5), symbolic of theWord of God, as in “the washing of water bythe word” (Eph 5:26), and “Now ye are cleanthrough the word which I have spoken untoyou” (Jn 15:3). When we believe the gospel,

4January 2008we are regenerated and washed clean. “Hesaved us by the washing of regeneration andrenewing of the Holy Ghost.” Peter declares:“Being born again.by the word of God.which by the gospel is preached unto you”(1 Pt 1:23-25).Having been brought into the family ofGod, we address Him as “Father” in prayer.In His high priestly prayer (the true “Lord’sprayer” that Christ prayed), He declared,“And this is life eternal, that they mightknow thee the only true God, and JesusChrist, whom thou hast sent” (Jn 17:3). Sothe new birth involves knowing the onlytrue God—not being “born again” throughbaptism, especially of infants.There are millions of so-called gods andnumerous prayers to each of them in thevarious religions they represent. The Biblecondemns every one in unmistakable terms:For all the gods of the nations are idols: butthe LORD made the heavens.Give unto theLORD the glory due unto his name.[F]earbefore him, all the earth.[H]e cometh tojudge the earth: he shall judge the worldwith righteousness, and the people withhis truth. (Ps 96:5-13)Such language is ridiculed by the “NewAtheists” such as Richard Dawkins, whosays the atheists must “spread the goodnews. Evangelism [to convert the world toatheism] is a moral imperative.” Althoughthe Bible clearly distinguishes Christianityfrom all religions and separates their leaders(Buddha, Muhammad, et al.) from Christ,who is unique, atheists make no such distinction. Consequently, most of their argumentsare irrelevant.The Bible denounces all religions asinstruments of Satan to keep mankind indarkness, shut off from the light of the gospelby which alone one can be saved, for “thegod of this world has blinded the minds ofthem which believe not” (2 Cor 4:4).Atheism is just one of the world’s religions, and Satanic blindness is reflected inits arguments against God and Christianity. Arecent secular article about the New Atheistswas titled, “The Church of the Non-Believers.” And it is a church—a church to whicheveryone must belong, if atheists get theirway. In their religious fervor to destroy “religious faith” and to convert the entire world totheir religion, they are blind to the true faiththat motivates biblical Christians.Dawkins says, “Faith is one of the world’sgreat evils.[It is] belief that isn’t based onevidence [and] the principal vice of any religion.” Francis Collins, however (in charge ofthe Human Genome Project involving 2,300scientists), who turned from unbelief to faithin Christ, says that Dawkins’ definition offaith “certainly does not describe the faith ofTH EBE R E A NCA L Lmost serious believers of history nor of mostof those of my personal acquaintance.”Many famous scientists, Nobel Prize winners, and some of the greatest historians andlegal experts have turned from atheism to faithin the resurrected Christ—not by mysticalor emotional experience but from verifiableevidence. The early pioneers in science, likeKepler, claimed that it was precisely their conviction that there was a creator that inspiredtheir science to ever-greater heights.“Religion is not only wrong; it’s evil,”atheists fume, unaware that biblical Christianity is not a religion but a relationship withGod through Jesus Christ. Leading atheistsharangue against religion, blind to the factthat the Bible is not about religion. In its morethan 1,000 pages, the phrase “religious faith”is not found once, the word “religion” appearsonly five times, all in one verse, and the word“religious” twice in the next verse. All but oneof these seven references is critical of “religion.” Furthermore, in these few times thatit mentions religion, the Bible never meanswhat atheists foolishly denounce.In their war against God, Dawkins andhis fellow crusaders dishonestly equateChristian “fundamentalists” with murderousMuslims. In fact, atheists are themselvesfundamentalists, seeking to impose theirwarped interpretation of the fundamentalsof science on the world.Nor can the New Atheists be ignorantof the fact that the fundamentals of Islam(according to the Qur’an, Hadith, the dogmas and example of Muhammad, and 1,300years of history) teach that Islam must beforced upon the entire world by murderingall who refuse to submit to Allah. Christtaught and lived entirely otherwise. Yet theNew Atheists persist in equating Islam andChristianity simply because each is considered to be a “faith.” Such irresponsibleaccusations permeate their arguments.Yes, some who have called themselvesChristians (Roman Catholic popes, EasternOrthodox leaders, crusaders, numeroustelevangelists, et al.) have been guilty of allmanner of evil. In the process, they haveviolated the teachings and example of Christ.But Muslim terrorists follow both Islamicteaching and the example of Muhammad andhis successors who tortured and slaughteredmillions from France to China for 13 centuries. Today’s terrorism is just a hint of whatIslam would continue to do if it could.The fundamentals of true Christianitypromote love, freedom of choice, and forgiveness, not hatred and violence. The latterare the trademark of fundamentalist Islam.To equate the fundamentals of Islam withthose of Christianity is reprehensible.Atheists also perversely equate Christianity with the fanaticism and violence of theCrusades and Inquisition. Yet the crusaderswere not biblical Christians; they violatedeverything Christ taught and slaughtered Hisbrethren, the Jews, everywhere they went. Itis gross dishonesty to attribute the crusaders’misconduct to biblical Christianity.From the days of Christ, multitudes ofChristians have never given allegiance toRome but to the Bible and to Christ alone.They were martyred by the millions by thechurch of Rome for centuries before the birthof Luther. From the 16th-century Reformation onward, millions of Roman Catholicsembraced faith in the Bible and Christalone and were martyred by the hundredsof thousands by the popes and their armies.To fail to distinguish between martyrs andtheir murderers is unconscionable.The New Atheists, led by Dawkins, callthemselves “the brights” and look upontheists as dimwits. Nobel laureate StevenWeinberg recently said, “The world needsto wake up from the long nightmare ofreligion.Anything we scientists can do toweaken the hold of religion should be done,and may in fact be our greatest contributionto civilization.” Richard Dawkins says: “Iam utterly fed up with the respect we havebeen brainwashed into bestowing on religion.” Religion? As we’ve seen, atheists aretilting at windmills.In their fervor to convert the world totheir religion, atheists betray their complete ignorance of biblical Christianity. TheBible is not a religious book and does notpromote “religion.”Many Christians try to be “scientific” byadopting theistic evolution as compatiblewith Christianity. Their compromise doesnot impress atheists. Unashamedly, Dawkinsdeclares that “evolution must lead to atheism” and “the atheist movement has.amoral imperative.to aggressively spreadthe good news.”Dawkins declares, “Should [theists] befree to impose their beliefs on their children?Is there something to be said for societystepping in?” This is dangerous totalitariantalk that makes one fear for parents andchildren alike.James Perloff put it well: “But remember;‘The princess kissed the frog, and he turnedinto a handsome prince.’ We call that a fairytale. Evolution says frogs turn into princes,and we call it science.Is that science? Or isit, like the fraud of Piltdown Man, the forgeries of Haeckel’s embryos, the misrepresentations of Inherit the Wind, and the coercionsof the Supreme Court, merely part of a longeffort to deny God?”Atheists who end up in hell cannot blamethe God they hate for excluding them fromheaven. We need to rescue as many as wecan from atheism’s lies.TBC

TQuotableAnd now I would ask you.who is themost powerful prelate in all England? Hesurpasses all the rest in his diligence. I cantell you. For I know him well.it is theDevil. He is the most diligent preacher ofall others; he is never out of his diocese.call for him when you will, he is alwaysavailable.But alas! The devil by the helpof that Italian bishop yonder [the pope],his chaplain, has labored by all means thathe might frustrate the death of Christ andthe merits of his passion.Hugh Latimer, most fruitful evangelistin England at the time, preaching tomore than 1,000 sitting on the grass atWhitehall, residence of King EdwardVI, the “British Josiah.” Latimer, Ridley, and Cranmer were among severalhundred protestants burned at the stakeby Edward’s half-sister, “Bloody Mary,”who stole the kingdom after his death andturned England back to Catholicism.Q&AQUESTION: I recently read “A CommonWord Between Us and You,” signed by 138Muslim scholars, clerics, and intellectualsfrom all over the world. They claim common ground shared by Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. The statement was wellreceived by scholars at the Yale Center forFaith and Culture. Moved by the “Muslim hand of conviviality and cooperationextended to Christians worldwide,” theyextended their “own Christian hand inreturn, so that we may live in peace andjustice, loving God and neighbors.”Yale’s scholars claim that Christianssinned against Muslims in the Crusades,and still do so by our “excesses in thewar on terror.” They say that if we couldachieve religious peace with Muslims,world peace would likely follow.The “common ground” between us issupposedly “love of God and neighbor.”Muslims say their God is “The InfinitelyGood and All-Merciful.” Yale scholarsagree that the Bible tells us “God is love”in 1 John 4:8. The “open letter” quotesMuhammad: “None of you has faith untilyou love for your neighbor what you lovefor yourself.” The Yale Center comparesthis to 1 John 4:8 and 20.The Yale scholars also state that when“freedom to worship God accordingto one’s conscience is curtailed, Godis dishonored.and neither God norneighbor is loved.” Haven’t you beena bit rough on those trying to establishpeaceful cooperation between ChristiansH EBE R E A NCA L Land Muslims? Romans 12:18 tells us,“If it is possible, as much as depends onyou, live peaceably with all men.” ManyMuslims want peace. Can’t we accept theolive branch they offer? Many Christianleaders have signed this agreement.RESPONSE: Common ground.olive branch.religious peace? Islam says Allah is theonly true God. Sixteen times the Qur’ansays Allah is not a father and has no son.But the very foundation of Christianity isthat “God so loved the world that he gavehis only begotten Son.the Father sent theSon to be the Savior of the world.” (Jn 3:16;1 Jn 4:14, etc., etc.) The Qur’an says Christ isnot the Son of God, did not die for our sinson the cross—someone died in His place, soHe did not rise from the dead, and anyonewho believes in the Trinity goes to hell.What common ground is there with thosewho reject every Christian distinctive?Muhammad teaches love for neighbor?His career included murders of hundredsof innocent people (all “neighbors” byChrist’s definition) during scores of unprovoked attacks upon villages and caravansinvolving robbery and murder. This horrorhas been multiplied thousands of times bysincere Muslims following the Qur’an andMuhammad’s example, slaughtering andtorturing untold millions from France toChina for 1,300 years.This unequaled mayhem and murder isstill justified by Muslim historians and clerics as true “Islam, Allah be praised!” Whenthe twin towers came down, hundreds ofthousands of Muslims around the worlddanced in the streets shouting, “AllahuAkbar!” [Allah is the greatest!]. The samecry rang in the streets during the Muslimriots in Paris, the Muslim riots over the Danish cartoons, and when two Israelis made awrong turn into Ramallah and were literallytorn apart by a frenzied mob, etc. Mobs,during binge after binge of destruction ofproperty and innocent lives, always screampraise to Allah. And Allah is the “commonground” for peace?!Christians mistreated Muslims in the Crusades? The crusaders were not Christians butRoman Catholics to whom (to match Islam’spromise of paradise for Muslims dying injihad) Pope Urban II promised escape frompurgatory to heaven for dying in the fight torecover the “Holy Land” (not for Israel butfor the Church!). They disobeyed Christ infighting for an earthly kingdom and killedevery Jew they encountered. Christ andChristianity cannot be blamed for what thesedeceived pawns of Rome did!Muslims had attacked and capturedNorth Africa, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, et al.,400 years earlier and had been torturing,January 20085enslaving, and slaughtering innocent andpeaceful civilians for centuries before thecrusaders finally struck back. Yale can’t beignorant of history! These “scholars” aresuppressing the truth to promote a lie!Excesses in the war on terror? At leastthe British and Americans follow the rulesof warfare and punish their own troopsif they misbehave. Compare that withvehicles loaded with explosives detonatedin markets, suicide bombers in mosques,every devilishly clever deception possibleto kill and maim, torturing and beheadingprisoners—and we are guilty of excesses?!Anyone who thinks we are in Afghanistanand Iraq for anything other than “as muchas possible” to find some means of livingpeacefully with these morally blind monsters is wrong.Freedom to worship God according to thedictates of one’s conscience?! Yale scholarsand evangelical signatories suggest we arepreventing this? We give Muslims full religious freedom in the West. We let them buildmosques by the thousands, though in manythey hide terrorists and plot our destruction.How do Muslims respond? Everywhere theygain control, all non-Islamic religions aresuppressed and often prohibited, Christiansare killed and churches destroyed by thethousands from Nigeria to Indonesia to Pakistan. In Saudi Arabia you can’t carry a Bibleon the street, cannot build a non-Muslimplace of worship, or even worship the Godof the Bible in the privacy of your home. Youmust be a Muslim to be a citizen! There is nofreedom of the press, of speech, of religion,of worship. Any Muslim who converts to anyother religion is beheaded in public.Whereis the extended olive branch?!Islam’s Allah is “The Infinitely Goodand All-Merciful”? Tell that to the manymillions enslaved, tortured, and slaughteredin his name! Muslims killed more just inIndia than Hitler killed in all of East andWest Europe and North Africa! Muhammadclaimed, “Allah has commanded me to fightagainst all people until all people confessthere is no god but Allah and Muhammadis his prophet.” Terrorists today are not“extremists” but true Muslims, obedient to Allah and following Muhammad’sexample. “Peace” is for those who submitto Allah! Some olive branch!I am shocked by the leaders who joinedMuslims in signing this document, whichbetrays Christ and the gospel for a phonypromise of “peace” from the enemies ofGod and Israel! Sadly, here are some ofthem: Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, GeorgeVerwer, Robert Schuller, John Stott, BrianD. McClaren, David Neff, Richard Mouw,Richard Cizik, David Yonggi Cho, et al.

6January 2008QUESTION [Excerpt of letter from leaderof large Messianic congregation]: Are youforbidding Gentile believers to celebrateJesus, our Passover Lamb, in a Passoversetting [Q&A 6/07;10/07]? It is one of the mostbeautiful things, and most prophetic, thatthe end-time church is rediscovering itsheritage in Israel.In the Millennium allnations, both Jew and Gentile, will haveto celebrate the Hebrew Feast of Sukkot(Tabernacles–Zechariah 14:16-21). Arewe not free to keep or not keep one dayabove the rest?RESPONSE: You are saying that for Gentilesto keep the Jewish Passover is a truth lostto the church and now being restored in this“end-time.” Yet the “Last Supper” was notthe annual Jewish Passover in remembranceof Israel’s deliverance but a new “Passover”feast for the church to keep “on the first dayof the week” (Acts 20:7), in remembrance ofthe death, burial, and resurrection of “Christour passover” (Lk 22:19; 1 Cor 5:7).Exodus 12:14 commands ethnic Jews tokeep the Passover “a feast by an ordinanceforever.” The fact that Jews alone keep thePassover is the great proof that they arethe chosen people to whom the PromisedLand was given for an everlasting possession: “When your children shall say.whatmean ye by this service?.[Y]e shall say,It is the sacrifice of the LORD’s passover.when he smote the Egyptians and deliveredour houses” (vv. 26,27). No Gentile couldsay that to his children—reason enough forGentiles not to keep this Jewish feast withits special meaning! This is specificallyfor the physical descendants of Abraham,Isaac, and Jacob, and for no one else. Sosays the Bible.Moreover, for Gentiles to keep this feastweakens its intended proof. Christians(whether Jews or Gentiles) celebrate “Christour Passover” in the breaking of bread “onthe first day of the week” (Acts 20:7), as did theearly church. The Jewish believers also keptthe Passover once a year as commanded.The fact that all nations will be forcedto keep Sukkot during the Millennium doesnot justify Gentiles keeping the Passover.Nor does it illustrate freedom to keep or notto keep one day above the rest. Nor doesRomans 14 refer to the Passover.QUESTION: I love your newsletter andradio program but I have to take exception to your statement [Dec ’07 article] thatfor Christ to taste “death for every manwould have to include the experience ofthe ‘lake of fire’ [which is] the seconddeath.” Jesus suffered physical death onthe cross and went immediately to theAbraham’s bosom/Paradise side of Sheol/Hades. As He said to the thief on the cross,TH EBE R E A NCA L L“Today you will be with me in Paradise,”not hell/gehenna/lake of fire. Yes, Goddid turn his back on Jesus—hence hiswords, “My God, my God, why hast thouforsaken me?” but Jesus did not actuallyexperience the “lake of fire,” which wasnot opened for business yet. The firstpersons to go there will be the Antichristand the False Prophet (Revelation 19:20).Your statement came too close to the falseteaching of Kenneth Copeland.RESPONSE: No, I was as far from Copeland’sheresy as the East is from the West. Copeland actually says, “Satan and every demontortured Christ in the depths of hell”—not“lake of fire.” But Satan is not the proprietorof either place and will be tormenting noone; he himself will be tormented continuosly forever in the Lake of Fire (R

Godʼs Pursuit of Man Tozer—Although written two years after the publication of The Pursuit of God, A.W. Tozer’s God’s Pursuit of Man sets forth the biblical truth that before man can pursue God, God must first pursue man. A “prequel” of sorts, God’s Pursuit of Man speaks fervently of God’s desire for man to be saved and the

Related Documents:

13A Fred Coyne (13C), Elsie Coyne nCe Eades (13A), Les Eades (13A), c. 1954 13B Corporal A. P. Farmer 13B Emily Farmer nCe Coyne with Martha and Phoebe Farmer (all 13B), 1890s 13B Eva Ross nCe Farmer (13B), Dolly Wheeler, Emily Keen nCe Farmer (13B), 1920s 13C Bertha Loo nCe Coyne

6 NCE 505 Design of Concrete 3 1 0 30 20 50 100 150 4 Structure-1 PRACTICAL/DRAWING/DESIGN 7 NCE 551 Geotechnical Engineering - - 3 10 10 20 30 50 1 Lab 8 NCE 552 Transportation Engineering - - 3 10 10 20 30 50 1 Lab 9 NCE 553 CAD Lab-1 - - 3 10 10 20 30 50 1

Verify that all the parts shipped with the NCE. Do not drop the NCE or subject it to physical shock. Parts included One NCE with removable terminal plugs. One data protection battery installed and connected when the NCE is shipped. One installation instructions sheet. Part No. 24-10143-63 Rev. T 2019-05-08 Release 9.0, 9.0.7

0000166690 New NCE FM CP FM 767388 Main 89.3 Ducktown, TN Legacy Broadcasting, Inc. 11/08/2021 Pending From: To: 0000167619 New NCE FM CP FM 768282 Main 89.1 Dickinson, ND Hi-Line Radio Fellowship, Inc. 11/09/2021 Pending From: To: 0000167324 New NCE FM CP FM 767294 Main 88.7 LUCERN

akuntansi musyarakah (sak no 106) Ayat tentang Musyarakah (Q.S. 39; 29) لًََّز ãَ åِاَ óِ îَخظَْ ó Þَْ ë Þٍجُزَِ ß ا äًَّ àَط لًَّجُرَ íَ åَ îظُِ Ûاَش

Collectively make tawbah to Allāh S so that you may acquire falāḥ [of this world and the Hereafter]. (24:31) The one who repents also becomes the beloved of Allāh S, Âَْ Èِﺑاﻮَّﺘﻟاَّﺐُّ ßُِ çﻪَّٰﻠﻟانَّاِ Verily, Allāh S loves those who are most repenting. (2:22

Generally at least 90 calendar days advance notice of the EE or NCE designation is provided to the employee. The incumbents shall be asked to accept the new designation of the position as an EE or NCE position and to sign the DD Form 2365 as a condition of continued employment. If an incumbent employee is unable or

and Exhibition (NCE) in Orlando, Florida. For 2019, 17 general infectious diseases sessions were accepted for the NCE in New Orleans, Louisiana along with other joint programs with the Section on Allergy and Immunology, the Section on Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, and the Section on Radiology.