PROGRAMME DESIGN DOCUMENT - World Vision

3y ago
63 Views
2 Downloads
404.88 KB
40 Pages
Last View : 8d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Annika Witter
Transcription

PROGRAMME DESIGNDOCUMENTLeuk Daek Area Development ProgrammeWorld Vision CambodiaLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 1

Table of Contents1Programme summary1.1Programme profile2Design methodology3Context for child well-being3.1Environmental context3.2Social Context3.3Political Context4Child well-being status4.1Children enjoy good health4.2Children are educated for life4.3Children love God and their neighbour4.4Children are cared for, protected and participating5Programme rationale5.1Strategic importance6Programme description6.1Programme goal and outcomes6.2Programme approach7Programme transition7.1Management of the Transition process8Learning and knowledge management strategy8.1Baseline Study8.2Knowledge management and learning8.3Programme evaluation9General implementation strategy10Management and administration10.1National office capacity10.2Programme structure11References12AppendicesLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design 37373838394040Page 2

List of acronymsACAgriculture CooperativeACSCEDAgriculture Cooperative for Sustainable community economic developmentADPArea Development ProgrammeADPTLFADP team leader forumAIDSAcquire immune deficiency syndromeALNAction Learn NetworkAPRAnnual Progress ReportARVAnti retrovirusBBBBirth Day Bound BackCCDMCommune Committee for Disaster ManagementCDHSCambodian Development Health SurveyCDMDCambodian Development Mission for DisabilityCIPCommune Investment PlanCLTSCommunity Lead Total SanitationCMSChild Monitoring SystemCPNChild Protection NetworkCSMPChild Sponsorship management projectCVACitizen Voice of ActionCWBOChild Well Being OutcomeDCDMDistrict Committee for Disaster ManagementDMEDesign Monitoring and EvaluationDOEDistrict of EducationFGDFocus Group DiscussionFNLFood and Nutrition livelihoodFYFiscal YearHCHealth CentreHEFCHealth Equity Fund CommitteeHHSHousehold SurveyIPCIndirect Project CostIPMIntegrated Programming ModelITTIndicator Tracking TableKSAKnowledge Skill and AttitudeLDRLabour Distribution ReportLFTLearning for transformationalMCCPMobilizing Community for Child ProtectionLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 3

MCHNMaternal and Child Health and NutritionMFIMicro finance InstitutesMoEYSMinistry of Education youth and SportMSC/SCMost significant Change/ story of ChangeNGONon Government OrganizationNONational OfficeNPMNational Policy ManagementOIOpportunity InfectionOMOOperations Monitoring OfficerOOCAOffice Operation Cost AllocationP&CPeople and CulturePBASPartnership Budget and Actual SystemPCProject CoordinatorPDAProvincial Department of AgriculturePDDProgram Design DocumentPDMPerformance development managementPLHIVPeople Living with HIVPMISProgram Management Information SystemPNCPost Natal CarePoAPlan of ActionRCRegistered ChildrenRCFRegister Children FamiliesSCStudent CouncilSDPCShare Direct project costSEASexual exploitationSHGSelf Help GroupSOSupport OfficeSSCSchool Support CommitteeSTEPSponsorship Tracking Enhancement ProgramSTOSector Technical OfficerTDTransformational DevelopmentTDFTransformational Development FacilitatorTDFTLTransformational Development Facilitator team leaderUNUnited NationVDCVillage Development CommitteeVFCVision Fund CambodiaLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 4

VHSGVillage Health Support GroupWASHWater and Sanitation HygieneWFCWater Festival CardWHOWorld Health OrganizationWVCWorld Vision CambodiaWVUSWorld Vision United StatesLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 5

1Programme summary1.1 Programme profileNational Office NameProgramme NameProgramme GoalProgramme OutcomesWorld Vision CambodiaLeuk Daek Area Development ProgramChildren are healthy, completed quality basic education and live inpeace.Outcome #1 To contribute to the transformation of Registered Children, theirfamilies, communities and sponsors.Outcome #2 All children, pregnant and lactating women are healthy, wellnourished, and protected from preventable diseases.Outcome #3 Children in target commune especially poor and poorest studentscompleted quality basic education.Programme Impact Area PopulationMale 6,440Female 6,508Boy 3,863Girl 4,040Male 4,000Female 6,508Boy 1,738 (project estimated number of male births in 2013-15 basedon ministry of planning data)Girl 2,080 (project estimated number of girl births in 2013-15 basedon ministry of planning data)Programme Direct Participants for education Male 1,267 (994 ID Poor1&2 people, 84 teachers, 95 SSCs members,and 94 AC members )Programme Direct Participants for MCHNFemale1,631 (1,180 ID Poor1&2, 62 teachers, 13 SSCs members, 376 ACmembers)Boy 3,029 [(Statistic student in school 2,432 (poor boys 241) and poorboys in community 597]Estimated Duration of Programme lifeProgramme PhaseProgramme Phase BudgetAnticipated Funding Source(s)Girl 2,469 [(Statistic student in schools 1,936(poor girls 293) and poorgirls in community 533)]15 years (FY01-FY15)Phase 3 ( Transition phase)933,500 USD (3yrs)Source #1 -Type of funding Sponsorship-Grant funding for MCCP project funded by FEC/PNS funding.- Grant funding for ACSCED project funded by World VisionAustralia.Registered Children NumbersCurrent Number of RC 2,500 RCs, 48% of boys and 52% girlEstimated number of RC for Year 1 2,500 RCs (FY13)Year 2 2,000 RCs (FY14)Year 3 1,000 RCs (FY15)Support Office NameNational Office review of PDD:Review dateReviewer’s name and titleNational Office approval/agree of PDD: ApprovaldateApprovers name and titleDate Design Document first Submitted to SOWorld Vision United SatesPlease see attached review toolsOD/MQD/PQL SOM12 July 2012( Should be updated whoever send last)Leuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 6

Support Office review of PDD:Review dateReviewer’s name and titleSupport Office approval of PDD:Approval dateApprovers name and titleEstimated Start Date of this Phase1st October 2013Leuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 7

2Design methodologyA mid-term evaluation of Leuk Daek ADP was conducted and completed in July 2011 byan external consultant with support from NO staffs and line management to measure theeffectiveness and efficiency of the program.To prepare for the process of re-design for transition, ADP staffs (05 PCs, 01 ADPmanager and 03 TDFs) reviewed the evaluation and attended redesign training on 19-23September 2011 and sector workshop on 24-28 October 2011 at Phnom Penh city. ADPstaffs learned on how to process re-design with community and also key partners. BeforeADP staffs conducted meeting with community, they conducted the IPM self assessmentreview tool on 08 November 2011 and subsequently developed a plan of action whichthey implemented .within the design process like inviting children to share their needs andrecommendations. ADP staffs also prepared key messages box and shared keyresults of evaluation with the community. The messages helped communitymembers to know where they are and what they intend to improve in the next threeyears.By using participatory approach, community shared their ideas to put in re-design; theyraised and prioritized hot issues, which form the basis for selecting projects in thetransition phase.We conducted three community workshops in the three target communes: in Preak Dechcommune on 22-24 November 2011, Peam Rang commune on 13-15 December 2011 andKhbop Atav commune on 20-22 December 2011. There were 117 persons participated inthe workshop. They were:one District of Education officer, 2 Commune Councilmembers, 10 village leaders, 3 Self Help Group representatives, 11 Village DevelopmentCommittee members, 5 HC staffs, 29 youths, 17 school teachers, 3 church leaders, 17Village Health Support Groups, and 19 Agriculture Cooperative leaders. Besidescommunity people, WVC staffs also participated such as operations manager, ADPmanager, zonal health, technical officer for economic and agriculture, education,transformational development facilitators, transformational development team leader, andproject coordinatorsTo verify community needs, ADP staffs invited key partners and stakeholders to reviewcommunity’s plan. There were 38 persons who participated such as one Chief ofProvincial Department of Education, Sports and Youth, one Deputy of Director ofProvincial Health Department, one Vice-District Governor, 2 Operational DistrictOfficers, 3 Health Centre staffs, 3 commune leaders, one District Agriculture Officer, onefrom the District of Education, one District of Hydrology Officer, 7 youths, 4 schoolteachers, 10 villager leaders and 3 AC leaders.Afterwards, key partners such as DOE staffs and also HC staffs developed solution tree on10 February 2012. After solution tree meeting, partners and staffs came up with draft logframe. Two projects were established in response to the issues of community besides ofsponsorship project such as Health and Nutrition and Education Projects. Other sectorssuch as disaster and agriculture, community decided to integrate into education projectbecause the same root causes. For example, child dropout of school, the main root causeLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 8

is family’s income that is not enough to support children go to school, so communitydecided to integrate to education project.To make sure the log-frame aligned with secondary strategy of WVC, ADP manager, PCsand TDFTL attended design workshop on 20-24 February 2012 at Phnom Penh city. Then,through face to face review on log-frame and also through email, ADP got result forprogram log-frame and submitted to line management and also SO to approval.Leuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 9

3Context for child well-being3.1 Environmental contextStatusLeuk Daek district has natural resources such as lowland forest with tall trees in amountof 14,512 hectares and rivers, lakes, and canals in amount of 8,194 hectares. These arepotential resources for fish to grow and it also brings water for doing farming. Moreover,community people could catch fish for food and also for selling. However some humanactions have affected the climate. The spread out of gas and other industrial pollutantsfrom garment factory and also from Vietnam has polluted the waters. Land erosion on theriver banks has also been observed. Other climate changes have intensified naturaldisasters that have affected the province and this district as well such as drought and flood.The recent flood damaged and destroyed household assets, livestock, crops and killedhuman lives and animals. To cope with these, WVC and local authority formed structureboth at district and commune level to respond to the disaster by building the capacity ofcommittee members. Existing structure, by supporting from WVC, conducted awarenessto community on danger sign, preparedness plan and also responded plan for all kinds ofdisaster to safe for people including children.AnalysisLowland forest, river and also canal are potential resource that community could benefitfrom these. However, there are many challenges like community destroyed lowland forestto be firewood and sell for income. Community also has an illegal fishing by using materialsthat are not allowed by the law. So it reduces the fish from time to time. Moreover,community dropped garbage improperly including garbage tangible and also liquid. Thoseaffected to hygiene, health and lost beauty of village compound. In addition, community hasused much pesticide that affected to multi-biology and polluted the environment. Therehave been structure of disaster committee, but their capacity is still limited, especially theyhave not enough funding to respond when disaster happened.3.2 Social ContextThe population in Leuk Daek district is 55,633 persons including 18,539 females, 17,735males, 9,481boys and 9,878 girls. The density of population is 185 persons/square metres.90.24% are farmers; their income is depended on agriculture products. Besides agricultureproducts, community earned income through fishing, garment factory worker, and alsogovernment staffs. Buddhist religion is 95 %, Christian 4% and Tao 1%. Currently, LeukDaek ADP has 2,500 RCs.3.2.1 Most Vulnerable GroupsStatusLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 10

Disabled persons, widows, children under 5 years old from poor families, pregnantwomen, PLHIVs, and those who are categorized as Poor 1 & 2 by the government areidentified as vulnerable people. They have neither intention nor ability to access theservices of health centre because they are engrossed with working or finding work to earndaily income to support their families every day. They focused less on protectingthemselves and preventing illnesses. They did not also keep their children in school longerdue to their limited family economic capacities. These groups earn small incomes and areat high risk in facing health and education problems. Most children born to poor familiesdo not get fully immunized because their parents are more concerned with day to daysurvival rather than bringing their children to the Health Centers for immunization. Mostchildren who are malnourished have parents who did not breastfeed them during the firstsix months nor gave them the proper nutritious complementary foods nor did they haveenough nutritious food to feed them. Some of children, they did not stay longer in schoolbecause they were forced to stop studying to work for income generation. However,previous time, ADP supported poor children in nourished food like soybean and most ofthem improved nutrition status. Poor students were supported like study materials andthey also were took care by teacher when they went to school because ADP alwaysaware to school teacher to treat then as same as other.AnalysisThe children who drop out of school are mostly from vulnerable families whose parentsdo not value education much because they spend all their time working in order to meettheir most basic need for food. Hence they allow their children to migrate for work. Forexample, children dropped out school to work at garment factory in local area and also goto Phnom Penh city. Not having much education and skills, the children sometimes fall intounsafe situations where their safety and health are placed at risk. This is why that theyspend much money when they get sick.3.2.2 Civil SocietyCivil Society Status:Lately the government through the Provincial Agriculture Department has promoted theformation of agricultural cooperatives which actually allows for cooperatives that are notonly focused on agricultural activities. Seeing this as a way to contribute to buildingeconomic resilience the ADP has availed of this opportunity. Agriculture cooperative (AC)was established by the Provincial Agriculture Department of Kandal with support by ADP.ADP staffs and agriculture officers worked together to complete all steps of forming fromstep one to five. Step 1 is to orient the AC concept. Step 2, disseminate royal degree tocommunity and let them know what is community, how can it sustain, how doesgovernment support on that. Through this step, community understood and consider forbecoming to be AC member. Step 3 is to draft by-law.In step 4, community who wanted to become member of AC, they came together andvote to select the best leaders to lead the AC. This is the way that ADP leads communitypeople to apply democracy by using their choice. Leaders of AC are called boardmembers. They worked together to implement the business plan of AC through assemblymeeting. In the by-law of AC, there is no someone making decision without agreementfrom other members even he/she is chairman. The benefit of AC will be shared toLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15Page 11

members and keep some for community development. They also decided to use reservefund for supporting poor child education and any emergency response of their members.Besides implementer as board member, AC has monitoring committee to monitor theperformance of AC board to ensure they have worked in the right ways. AC is not onlyan idea of WVC concept to establish it, but also government structure that it wanted toengage community people to be a group which is easy to support them rather thanindividual household.Before ADP staffs and PDA officers worked to establish AC, all members of AC camefrom self help group (SHG). SHG is a group from 10-20 members who worked togetherfor saving money, loan to members and also shared any agriculture technique to memberto improve how to grow the rice and also corn. Moreover, they met each other everymonth to share their concern and solve the problem together. It is very helpful for themto make a good relationship. SHG is an initiative of WVC staffs that wanted them to besocialized.Health Equity Fund Committee is a group that initiated by ADP staffs under fully supportof district governor to mobilize community resource to support the vulnerable peoplewhen they got sick and have no ability to pay for health service. Recently, this committeeat district level is recognized by district governor, district monk leader and alsooperational district. The structure is allowed the monk to be chairman because monk isable to mobilize community resource through religious activities. In addition, committeehave built their capacity to manage the resource with transparency. These are the waysthat vulnerable are focused through mobilizing community themselves to help each other.Table: Agencies working in the programme impact areaOrganisation orGroupLocationAgriculture CooperativeLeuk Daek districtVision Fund CambodiaNational Office withWVCSchool SupportCommitteesPrimary school in LeukDaekLocal ChurchesLeuk DaekAmret, microfinanceinstitute.Leuk Daek branchoffice.Kredit, microfinanceLeuk Daek branchLeuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15GoalsToengagecommunitymembers to be a group fordoing business in the area ofagriculture.Support loan to thepoor/poorestcommunityincluding WV transparent program budgetand child monitoring foreducation.Mobilizechildrenforeducation and strengthenspiritual development forcommunity of faith.To provide a wide range offinancial services for lowincome people as well asmicro, small and mediumenterprises-while at thesame time achieving a highlevel of financial and socialperformance.To be a reliable and wellStart and resent2001-present2006-presentPage 12

Organisation orGroupLocationinstitute.office.ACLEDALeuk Daek branchofficePRASACLeuk Daek branchofficeAMK CambodiaLeuk Daek branchofficeCambodian DevelopmentMission for Disability(CDMD)Office base in PhnomPenhThe Cambodia TrustOffice base in PhnomPenhMARIE STOPESINTERNATIONALCAMBODIAOffice base in PhnomPenhGoalsknown financial institutionthat provides diverse andinnovative financial solutionsto communities, serving andprotecting our clients whilemaintaining organizationalsustainabilitywithacommitment to the poor.To provide micro, small andmedium entrepreneurs withthe wherewithal to managetheir financial resourcesefficiently and by doing soto improve the quality oftheir lives.To provide sustainableaccess to financial servicesfor rural communities andmicro-enterprises.To help large numbers ofpoor people to improvetheir livelihood optionsthrough the delivery ofappropriateandviablemicrofinance services.Is working towards aninclusive, barrier-free andrights-based society forpeople with functional skills.Provide reproductive andsexual health services.Start and resent2011-present2009-presentWorld Vision History in the AreaLeuk Daek ADP is one of four ADPs in the Kandal Province operations area. It was thesecond ADP in Kandal operations to start with child sponsorship management project in2002 and now Leuk Daek ADP has 2,500 RCs funded b

Leuk Daek Area Development Programme Design FY13-FY15 Page 6 1 Programme summary 1.1 Programme profile National Office Name World Vision Cambodia Programme Name Leuk Daek Area Development Program Programme Goal Children are healthy, completed quality basic education and live in peace. Programme Outcomes Outcome #1 Outcome #2 Outcome #3

Related Documents:

2 Contents Page The Song Tree Introduction 3-7 Programme 1 Fly, golden eagle 8 Programme 2 Magic hummingbird 9 Programme 3 It’s hard to believe 10 Programme 4 Another ear of corn 11 Programme 5 The door to a secret world 12 Programme 6 Song of the kivas 13 Programme 7 Mighty Muy’ingwa 14 Programme 8 Heavenly rain 15 Programme 9 Rehearsal 16 Programme 10 Performance 17

2 Contents Page Music Workshop Introduction 3 Programme 1 Loki the Joker 7 Programme 2 Odin, Mighty World-Creator 8 Programme 3 Goblins a Go-Go! 9 Programme 4 Sing us a Saga 10 Programme 5 Thor on a journey 11 Programme 6 Apples of Iduna 12 Programme 7 Birds of the North 13 Programme 8 Rehearsal and Performance (1) 14 Programme 9 Rehearsal and Performance (2) 15 .

Layout of the Vision Center Equipment needs for a Vision Center Furniture Drugs and consumables at a Vision Centre Stationery at Vision Centers Personnel at a Vision Center Support from a Secondary Center (Service Center) for a Vision Center Expected workload at a Vision Centre Scheduling of activities at a Vision Center Financial .

VISION TM Toolkits MEASURE CALIBRATE DEVELOP OPTIMIZE SUCCEED www.accuratetechnologies.com VISION Calibration and Data Acquisition Toolkits VISION Toolkit Dependency: Part Number Name 152-0200 VISION Standard Calibration Package 152-0201 VISION Standard Calibration Package w/Third Party I/O 152-0208 VISION Data Acquisition Package 152-0209 VISION ECU Flashing Package 152-0210 .

3. B.Sc. (General) Programme Following UGC guidelines, University has launched Bachelor’s Degree programme in Science under the Choice Based Credit System. The detail of the programme is given below: Programme Objectives The broad objective of the B.Sc. programme is to provide higher education required for a

1 PROGRAMME PROJECT REPORT (PPR) Name of the Programme: MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ZOOLOGY (M.Sc. in ZOOLOGY) Duration: Minimum 2 years Maximum 4 years Recognition: This Programme was recognized by DEC-IGNOU and now by the UGC-DEB A. PROGRAMME’S MISSION & VISION Vision: To p

Programme Initiation Document The purpose of this document is to describe in detail the purpose, scope and outcomes of the programme, how it will be delivered and when, the ways in which the programme will be . Mia Evans Services Project Manager Macmillan Sue Ling Comms and Engagement Officer PCC Yvette Marks Project Manager PTHB Information .

The standards are neither curriculum nor instructional practices. While the Arizona English Language Arts Standards may be used as the basis for curriculum, they are not a curriculum. Therefore, identifying the sequence of instruction at each grade - what will be taught and for how long- requires concerted effort and attention at the local level. Curricular tools, including textbooks, are .