Leader’s Guide To Objective Assessment Of Training Proficiency

2y ago
36 Views
2 Downloads
2.07 MB
69 Pages
Last View : 2d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Mika Lloyd
Transcription

15 March 2017Leader’s Guide toObjective Assessment ofTraining ProficiencyInformally referred to as the Army’s ‘Objective-T’ initiative, these procedures outline howleaders and units objectively assess and record training proficiency IAW FM 7-0, Train toWin in a Complex World. To correctly implement the procedures outlined in this guide,leaders should start with a full understanding of the basic, doctrinal procedures found inFM 7-0. This Leader’s Guide supports FM 7-0 and serves as interim instruction to assistleaders in understanding and implementing the objective assessment and recording oftraining proficiencies.HQDA G/3/5/7Department of the Army

[This leader’s guide is formatted to optimize 2-sided printing]The proponent for the Leader’s Guide: Objective Assessment of TrainingProficiency is the Department of the Army. The preparing agency is the TrainingManagement Directorate (TMD) within CAC–Training (CAC-T). CAC–T issubordinate to the United States Army Combined Arms Center. TMD is the Armyproponent for training management. Send comments through the Army TrainingNetwork (ATN) at https://atn.army.mil using the “Ask-A-Trainer” feature and usingthe term “LG to Assessment” in the subject line.2

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyTable of ContentsForewordChapter 1Introduction to Training ProficiencyChapter 2Assessing Training ProficiencySECTION I – Individual, Crew Served and Platform ProficiencySECTION II – Mission-Essential Task ProficiencySECTION III – Collective Live-Fire Task ProficiencySECTION IV – Training DaysChapter 3Recording Training ProficiencyChapter 4Reporting Training ReadinessAppendicesA. Terms of ReferenceB. Operational Environment (OE)C. Individual/Crew Served/Platform Proficiency TablesD. Collective Live-Fire GatesE. Unit Training Proficiency ReportF. Training and Evaluation OutlinesReferences3March 2017

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training Proficiency15 March 2017ForewordThis Leader’s Guide provides procedural instructions in supportof Army Directive 2016-05 (Building Training Readiness), HQDAEXORD 002-16 (Enable, Resource, Build, Assess, and SustainTraining Readiness), FRAGO 1 to EXORD 002-16, and FRAGO 2 toEXORD 002-16.The Guide serves as a bridging document for AR 220-1 (ArmyUnit Status Reporting and Force Registration – ConsolidatedPolicies), AR 350-1 (Army Training and Leader Development), theirassociated DA PAMs, and FM 7-0. Where there are differencesbetween AR 220-1, AR 350-1, and FM 7-0 and the procedures statedin the Leader's Guide to Objective Assessment of TrainingProficiency, the Leader's Guide has predominance. The Leader'sGuide provides prescriptive guidance in the interim until these otherpublications are revised and updated. It applies Army wide unlessotherwise stated.I encourage you to read FM 7-0, Train to Win in a ComplexWorld. As leaders, our responsibility is to properly plan, prepare,execute, and assess training to ensure our Soldiers are prepared forcombat. Training readiness informs senior leaders and supports theirdecisions regarding the distribution of a wide variety of resources, toinclude time,me money, and personnel.For additional information and supporting documentation pleasevisit the Army Training Network https://atn.army.mil. If you haveadditional questions contact your USR reporting POCs, as well asyour chain of command.HAR I 5 !Oil-,J l ANDERSONLieutenant General, GSDeputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/74

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Chapter 1Introduction to Training ProficiencyThis chapter provides an overview and background to theArmy’s effort to make the evaluation, assessment and recordingof training proficiency more objective. This in turn provides thefundamental basics of how units report the foundationalcomponents of Training Readiness in the Commanders UnitStatus Report.Introduction1-1. Training is the cornerstone of readiness. Readiness determines our Nation’sability to fight and win in a complex world. To achieve and maintain a high degreeof readiness, the Army trains in the most efficient and effective manner possible.Realistic training with limited time and resources demands commanders focus theirunit training efforts to maximize training proficiency. Evaluating, assessing,recording, and reporting unit training proficiency and training readiness requiresArmy Leaders to have a firm understanding of the training fundamentalsestablished by FM 7-0, Train to Win in a Complex World.1-2. The purpose of this guide is to detail the procedures for Army leaders toobjectively and accurately evaluate, assess, record, and report the fourFoundational Components of Training Readiness. It applies to all Army readinessreporting units. This guide serves as a baseline and prescriptive tool for unitleaders as they assess unit training proficiency. Where there are differencesbetween AR 220-1, AR 350-1, and FM 7-0 and the procedures stated in theLeader's Guide to Objective Assessment of Training Proficiency, the Leader'sGuide has predominance. The Leader's Guide provides prescriptive guidance inthe interim until AR 220-1, AR 350-1 and FM 7-0 are revised and updated.Background1-3. The Army needs a disciplined and objective linkage between assessingtraining proficiency and reporting training readiness. This guide addressesobjective evaluation criteria to prevent over-weighted subjective taskassessments, in order to provide a more complete and accurate report of actualunit capabilities and readiness. This guide addresses effects of over a decade of5

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017unit deployments and persistent combat operations, which contributed to leaders’diminished understanding and employment of sound, fundamental unit driventraining doctrine and procedures.Figure 1-1. Process of assessing Training Proficiency and reporting Training ReadinessLinking Training Proficiencies to Training Readiness1-4. Units train to achieve and sustain training proficiencies. Proficiencies aredirectly related to the unit’s training readiness as reflected in the T-level rating asdefined by AR 220-1. This Leader’s Guide provides the metrics and how-to fortranslating the unit’s training proficiencies into the unit’s training readiness level.1-5. Training Proficiencies are the measure of individuals, crews, and units abilityto perform their training tasks to standard. For individual and crew tasks, the Armyproponent for the task defines the standards and the ratings for measuring taskproficiency. For all Army collective tasks, the task’s T&EO contains the standardsand the proficiency ratings. Select training proficiencies are used for readinessreporting purposes and are outlined in this guide.1-6. The T-level Rating is an assessment of the unit’s ability to provide thecapabilities for which it was designed based upon a composite assessment of thefour foundational components of training readiness. Assigned Mission Training(AMT) Level is a reflection of the Commanders assessment of the units trainingproficiency to provide the capabilities required to accomplish its assigned missionas determined by the Army Tasking Authority.Components of Training Readiness1-7. There are four foundational components of training readiness.a. Individual, Crew Served, and Platform Proficiency conducted IAWappropriate doctrinal reference (TRADOC proponent Centers of Excellencepromulgate qualification standards by weapon system) with three categories:Individual, Crew Served, and Platform (I/CS/P). ‘Qualified’ or ‘Unqualified’ are thetraining proficiency measures used for the reporting of these proficiencies.b. Mission-Essential Task (MET) Proficiency demonstrated throughevaluation of collective task proficiency during training events IAW MET Trainingand Evaluation Outlines (T&EO).6

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017c. Collective Live-Fire Task Proficiency demonstrated through evaluation ofcollective task proficiency under live-fire conditions IAW Training and EvaluationOutlines (T&EO). The Commander two levels above the echelon of measuredproficiency determines the collective task(s) that will be performed/evaluatedunder live-fire conditions. The collective live-fire task(s) are performed during thelive-fire gate specified for the unit in Appendix D.d. Training Days (T-Days) The Commander’s estimate of the minimumnumber of continuous training days, unconstrained by resources, required toachieve T1. T-Days is derived from the approved unit training plan (UTP) andrefined through commanders’ dialogue.7

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyThis page intentionally left blank.8March 2017

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Chapter 2Evaluating and Assessing Training ProficiencyThis chapter provides a description for evaluating and assessingthe four foundational components of training readiness:Individual, Crew Served and Platform Proficiency; MissionEssential Task (MET) Proficiency; Collective Live-Fire TaskProficiency, and Training Days (T-Days).Introduction2-1. IAW FM 7-0, Chapter 1. The objective evaluation and assessment of trainingis measured against approved and published standards. The four components are;Individual, Crew Served, and Platform Proficiency, Mission-Essential Task (MET)Proficiency, Collective Live-Fire Task Proficiency, and continuous Training Daysto achieve T1 as shown in Figure 2-1.Figure 2-1. The components of training readiness9

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyThis page intentionally left blank.10March 2017

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017SECTION IIndividual, Crew Served, and Platform Proficiency2-2. This section provides guidance on reporting individual, crew served, andplatform weapon system proficiency. Qualification for individual, crew served, andplatform is determined IAW the proponent published training circular (TC) for thatweapon. Training circulars can be accessed on the Army publishing directorate(APD) website, http://www.apd.army.mil/.2-3. Qualification standards are determined by the weapon system’s proponent.Proficiencies are either qualified or not qualified for readiness reporting purposes.Training proficiency for individual, crew served and platform (I/CS/P) weaponsystem qualification is based on the unit’s MTOE equipment systems under therequired column. See Appendix C for the I/CS/P Qualification tables.Figure 2-2. The individual, crew served and platform qualification componentProcedures2-4. Units report only the systems as required by MTOE and listed in Appendix C.Units with more individual, crew served or platform weapon systems on-hand thanrequired by MTOE only report those required by MTOE. A unit with only individualweapons reports individual qualification only. A unit with only individual and crewserved weapons reports only individual and crew served qualifications. Pintlemounted crew served weapons are counted only in their mounted role.2-5. I/CS/P categories are defined as:a. Individual. Training proficiency for individual weapon qualification is basedon the total number of individual weapon types required by MTOE (Note: If aSoldier is assigned two individual weapons by MTOE, e.g. M4 Carbine and M203,reporting qualification proficiency on both weapons is required). The Armystandard for individual weapon qualification duration is 12 months.b. Crew Served. A weapon required by unit MTOE and identified by individualand crew served qualification criteria table (Appendix C) as being assigned to andoperated by two or more individuals functioning as a crew.11

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017c. Platform. A weapon system operated by a crew and defined in AppendixC. Replacement of one or more key individuals within the crew requires requalification, this does not apply for aviation platforms.d. Systems not listed in Appendix C, such as special purpose weapons, nonkinetic systems, and special skill requirements are not captured for T-levelreporting purposes at this time.2-6. Qualification percentages are independently calculated for each of the threecategories (Individual, Crew Served, and Platform) IAW the following rules (% numerator / denominator X 100).a. Numerator: The number of Soldiers and / or Crews that are qualified onthe weapon.b. Denominator: The number of weapons required by the MTOE.c. In general, the overall qualification percentage for companies / troops /batteries (even for separate AA level reporting units) is calculated by averagingseparate qualification percentages for I/CS/P (all that apply to the unit). As anexample, see Figure 2-3. By exception, platform centric companies / troops /batteries (non HHC) calculate all percentages but report only the platformpercentage as the unit’s overall I/CS/P percentage. As an example, see Figure2-4 below. Platform centric units are listed in Table C-4 and include tank / armorcompanies / troops, attack / reconnaissance companies / troops, field artillerybatteries, and ADA batteries.2-7. In general, AA (units with UICs that end in AA) units above company levelcalculate their I/CS/P percentage by taking the geometric mean of subordinatecompany I/CS/P percentages, as illustrated in figure 2-5 below.2-8. FF (major units with organic subordinate units with UICs ending in AA) unitscalculate their I/CS/P percentage by taking the geometric mean of theirdoctrinally aligned AA’s I/CS/P proficiency rating, as illustrated in figure 2-6below.12

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Example: Mechanized Rifle Company from a Combined Arms Battalion, in an ABCT assigned120/135 Soldiers. Unit has all weapons systems from the MTOE required column .Individual 105 of 115 M4 qualified2 of 2 M9 qualified18 of 18 M249 qualified13 of 18 shotgun qualified12 of 20 M320A qualifiedCrew ServedPlatform 9 of 11 M240B qualified 1 of 1 Mk 19 qualifiedQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required150 / 173 87%Qualified Required10 / 12 83%87%83% 14 of 14 M2A2Qualification RatingQualified Required14 / 14 100%100%Company I/CS/P Rating(87 83 100) / 3 90%Figure 2-3 Mechanized Rifle Company (I/CS/P average of Individual, Crew Served, andPlatform qualification percentages)Individual & Crew QualificationMathematical Average MethodologyExample: Armor Company from a Combined Arms Battalion, in an ABCT assigned 62/62Soldiers. Unit has all weapons systems from the MTOE required column .Individual 43 of 58 M4 qualified21 of 21 M9 qualified4 of 4 M320A qualifiedCrew Served 2 of 2 M2HBQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required68 / 83 82%Qualified Required2/282%Platform 10 of 14 M1A2Qualification RatingQualified Required10 / 14 71%71%100%Company I/CS/P RatingPlatform % 71%Figure 2-4 Platform Centric Unit (I/CS/P platform rating)13

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Procedures forCalculated atAA UICAA LevelMetric 4Individual, Crew Served,and Platform Qualification 90%123493 X 90 X 71 X 94 86%2 90% to 80% 80% to 70% 70%Geometric Mean: measure of central tendency equal to the nth root of the product of the values in a set; used whencomparing different items where each item has multiple properties with varying numeric ranges.Mathematical Average of QualRates to AA LevelIndividualReq173Qual160Crew Served%92%Req51Qual48Platform%94%Req14Crew 15087%121083%1414100%Crew %141071%Individual93%(92 94 93)/3PlatformReqIndividualI/CS/PRatingCrew 088%11100%I/CS/PRating90%(87 83 100)/3I/CS/PRating71%Platform %I/CS/PRating94%(93 88 100)/3Figure 2-5 Calculation procedure for AA Level unit Combined Arms BattalionNote: If any Qualification Percentage is 0, enter 1.ProceduresCalculated atFF UICFF LevelGeometric Mean 83X2X2X2X3X2X4X2 2Qualification Metric (1-4)to FF LevelGeometric Mean: measure of central tendency equal to the nth root of the product of the values in a set; used when comparing differentitems where each item has multiple properties with varying numeric ranges.Figure 2-6 Calculation procedure for FF Level unit Brigade Combat Team14

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Individual & Crew QualificationMathematical Average MethodologyExample: HHC STB Sustainment Brigade. Unit has all weapons systems from the MTOErequired column .Individual 45 of 49 M4 qualified5 of 5 M9 qualified5 of 6 M249 qualified5 of 6 M320A qualifiedCrew ServedPlatform 2 of 4 M240B qualified 2 of 3 M249L qualified 1 of 1 Mk 19 qualified 5 of 5 Convoy ProtectionPlatformQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required60 / 66 91%Qualified Required10 / 13 77%91%77% N/AN/AHHC STB I/CS/P Rating(91 77) / 2 84%MetricIndividual, Crew Served,and Platform Qualification1234 90% 90% to 80%STB2 80% to 70% 70%Figure 2-7 HHC and HQ Special Troops Battalion (STB) Sustainment BrigadeExample: Signal Company (can apply to any non-platform company). Unit has all weaponssystems from the MTOE required column .Individual 30 of 33 M4 qualified 1 of 1 M9 qualified 4 of 4 M249 qualifiedCrew Served 1 of 1 .50 CAL qualified 5 of 6 M249L qualifiedQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required35 / 38 92%Qualified Required6 / 7 86%92%86%Platform N/AN/ACompany I/CS/P Rating(92 86) / 2 89%Metric1234Individual, Crew Served,and Platform Qualification 90% 90% to 80% 80% to 70%Figure 2-8 Signal Company, Sustainment Brigade15 70%2

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Calculated atFF UICSustainment Brigade (FF Unit) I/CS/P Q MetricGeometric Mean 2 2x22Qualification MetricGeometric Mean: measure of central tendency equal to the nth root of the product of the values in a set; used when comparing differentitems where each item has multiple properties with varying numeric ranges.22Figure 2-9 Calculation for an FF Level Sustainment BrigadeNote: The signal company in a Sustainment Brigade is an AA reporting unit.Individual & Crew QualificationMathematical Average MethodologyExample: Functional and Multi-Functional Sustainment Companies. Unit has all weaponssystems from the MTOE required column .Individual 105 of 115 M4 qualified10 of 12 M9 qualified18 of 18 M249 qualified12 of 20 M320A qualifiedCrew Served 9 of 11 M240B qualified 11 of 15 M249L qualified 1 of 1 Mk 19 qualified 5 of 5 Convoy ProtectionPlatformQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required145 / 165 88%Qualified Required26 / 32 81%88%81%Platform N/AN/ACompany I/CS/P Rating(88 81) / 2 85%Figure 2-10 Calculation for an AA level Multifunctional Sustainment Company16

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Individual & Crew QualificationMathematical Average MethodologyExample: HHB Field Artillery. Unit has all weapons systems from the MTOE required column .IndividualCrew Served 37 of 150 M4 qualified 5 of 11 M9 qualified 10 of 18 M320A qualifiedPlatform 10 of 18 M240B qualified 5 of 10 Mk 19 qualified 6 of 11 M2 .50 CALQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required52 / 179 29%Qualified Required21 / 39 54%29% N/A54%N/ABattery I/CS/P Rating(29 54) / 2 42%Figure 2-11 Calculation for an AA level Field Artillery HHBIndividual & Crew QualificationMathematical Average MethodologyExample: Field Artillery Battery (MLRS). Unit has all weapons systems from the MTOErequired column .Individual 57 of 71 M4 qualified 1 of 1 M9 qualified 5 of 11 M320A qualifiedCrew Served 8 of 11 M240B qualified3 of 4 Mk 19 qualified1 of 1 249L qualified2 of 3 M2 .50 CALPlatform 8 of 8 M270 MLRSLauncher qualifiedQualification RatingQualification RatingQualification RatingQualified Required63 / 83 76%Qualified Required14 / 19 74%Qualified Required8 / 8 100%76%74%100%Battery I/CS/P RatingPlatform% 100%Figure 2-12 Calculation for an AA level Field Artillery Battery17

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017IICalculated atAA UICField Artillery Battalion (AA Unit) I/CS/P Q MetricMetric 3Individual, Crew Served,and Platform Qualification 90%123442 X 100 X 100 75%3 90% to 80% 80% to 70% 70%Geometric Mean: measure of central tendency equal to the nth root of the product of the values in a set; used whencomparing different items where each item has multiple properties with varying numeric ranges.Mathematical Average of QualRates to AA LevelIHHBIndividualCrew 54%N/AN/AN/AI/CS/PRating42%(29 54) / 2IReq83Crew eq8Qual8I/CS/PRating%100%100%Platform %IIndividualReq83Crew CS/PRating%100%100%Platform %Figure 2-13 Calculation for an AA level Field Artillery BattalionNote: If any Qualification Percentage is 0, enter 1.Calculated atFF UICField Artillery Brigade (FF Unit) I/CS/P Q MetricGeometric Mean 6 2 X 3 X 2 X 4 X 3x 33 Geometric Mean: measure of central tendency equal to the nth root of the product of the values in a set; used when comparing differentitems where each item has multiple properties with varying numeric ranges.IIIIIIIIIQualification Metric (1-4)to FF re 2-14 Calculation for an FF level Field Artillery Brigade18

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017SECTION IIMission-Essential Task Proficiency2-9. The Mission-Essential Tasks (METs) are collective tasks evaluated andassessed by commanders at all echelons through bottom-up feedback obtainedprimarily through the use of training and evaluation outlines (T&EO). T&EOsprovide the Army standard for all individual and collective tasks, and are based onthe conditions established by the publishing proponents. T&EOs are available inDTMS, CATS, CAR and ATN. The MET proficiency component is determinedusing the metrics in Figure 2-16 under the MET proficiency column and thecommander’s assessment of unit proficiency (T, T-, P, P-, U) on tasks in theMission-Essential Task List (METL). The Commander’s proficiency assessmentis based primarily on evaluation of unit performance of the MET during collectivetraining using Objective Task Evaluation Criteria Matrix found in FM 7-0 Chapter3, shown in Figure 2-17 of this guide, and applied to the MET in the T&EO. Figure2-20 shows how the task criteria matrix is used to evaluate unit MET proficiency.Figure 2-16. The MET proficiency component2-10. For mission-essential tasks (MET) assessments, there is no requirement toformally record/report a proficiency assessment for each MET’s supportingcollective tasks. The MET's T&EO stands alone as the approved performancestandard for the MET. See supporting collective tasks in Appendix A.Task Criteria Matrix2-11. The Objective Task Evaluation Criteria Matrix found in FM 7-0 Chapter 3 andshown in Figure 2-17 in this guide is referred to as the “task criteria matrix”throughout this leaders guide for simplicity. The task criteria matrix is the Armystandard evaluation criteria used by commanders to objectively evaluate theirunit’s collective task training conducted during collective training events. See FM7-0.2-12. The task criteria matrix consists of the following fields, allowing the evaluatorto capture a more accurate and objective picture of the unit’s performance of thecollective task: (Operational environment (OE), Training environment, PercentLeaders present, Percent Soldiers Present at training, External evaluation,Performance measures, Critical performance measures, Leader performancemeasures).19

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyPlan and PrepareExecuteTask proficiency rating 80%Leader performancemeasuresCritical performancemeasuresPerformance measuresOEPPPLTSQD 90%GO 85% 90%T80-90%AllGO75-84%T80-89%65-74% 75-79%65-79%GOP60-64% namic&complex( all OEvariablesand singlethreat)External evaluationDynamicandDynamic complex(single(all OEthreat)variablesand singlethreat)Proponent establishes training environment standardsStatic(singlethreat)Dynamicandcomplex(all OEvariablesand 4 OEthreat)variablesand hybridthreat)BDEandabove% Present at training/authorizedCOandBN% Leaders presentat training/authorizedTraining arch 2017 All 80% 60% 60%operational environmentpracticedmarginally practicedplatoonsquad 51%GOTTUVUfully trainedtraineduntrainedvirtualNote:1. The percentages used in this figure are for illustration only. See the collective task’s published training andevaluation outline for the applicable percentages.2. Dialogue between commanders at multiple echelons is essential when assessing METs. See para 2-23 of thisguide.Figure 2-17. Objective Task Evaluation Criteria Matrix20

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Operational Environment2-13. The proponent describes the variables of an operational environment in thecondition paragraph of the T&EO. The proponent builds a near-peer competitorinto the training scenario. The operational environment is within the Plan andPrepare section of the task criteria matrix, and depicts by echelon what theoperational environment requirements are for obtaining an assessment rating. TheCommanders plan at echelon how to conduct METL training and in whatenvironment it will be conducted. See figure 2-18.Figure 2-18. Replicating and recording the OE on a task criteria matrixAn example of addressing the OE can be found in figure 2-18. Of note, these areexamples. Commanders may use any aspect of PMESII-PT in accordance withthe training objectives. (See ADRP 3-0 for a full description of operationalvariables).21

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Figure 2-19. Examples for achieving trained (T-) assessmentsTraining Environment2-14. The proponent establishes the training environment conditions available forthe task. The three training environments consist of live, virtual (includes gaming),and constructive (LVC). T&EO may reference the Combined Arms TrainingStrategy (CATS) statement. CATS should be referenced when developing a UnitTraining Plan (UTP). CATS are located on the ATN. (See FM 7-0, Chapter 2 for adescription of each of the training environments).Percent of Leaders Present2-15. The unit records the percentage of unit key leaders present at the trainingevent. Key leaders are leaders in leadership positions within the organization. Thetask criteria matrix compares the number of personnel present against theauthorized strength identified in the TOE, MTOE, or TDA. Leaders are identifiedin the standards of each T&EO. If not articulated in the standards paragraph ofthe T&EO, the leaders for the collective task are the leaders in leadership positionsat echelon of the collective task being trained/evaluated and one echelon below.For example (two use cases):a. In a Rifle Platoon, the leaders are the Platoon Leader, PlatoonSergeant and the 4 Squad Leaders. If the Platoon Sergeant is not presentduring the training of the Platoon’s collective task(s) being evaluated, thereare 5 of 6 leaders present or 83%. (If a Staff Sergeant is serving as the22

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 2017Platoon Sergeant permanently then that leader position is accounted for,for reporting purposes.)b. A Division is conducting the collective task Perform Reconnaissanceor Conduct Reconnaissance in Force. The leaders for this task wouldinclude but are not limited to, the Division Commander, CSM, ADC-M, ADCO, ACOS G2, G2X, ACE Chief, Chief of Fires, Chief of Protection, CBRN,IO, and subordinate commanders O5 and above.Percent Present for Training2-16. The unit records the percent of the unit present at the training event. Thetask criteria matrix compares the number present against the numbers presentidentified in the authorized strength of the TOE, MTOE, or TDA.External Evaluation (EXEVAL)2-17. EXEVALs are proficiency evaluations conducted from outside the unit. TheEXEVAL provides commanders and senior commanders a more objective way toevaluate unit training proficiency and enhance the ability to accurately evaluateMETs or other collective task proficiency. All units in the Army undergo an EXEVALto achieve and validate training proficiency. (See FM 7-0, Chapter 3, 3-49).Performance Measures2-18. The proponent defines the performance measures for each task. Theseinclude both leader steps/measures and critical steps/measures. Performance isrecorded as GO, NO-GO, or N/A (not applicable) based on the standards for thetask and the unit’s demonstrated execution of the task. The results are calculatedusing the task performance/evaluation summary block found on each T&EO.Critical Performance Measures2-19. As noted within the performance measures as the proponent identifiedcritical steps within the performance measures for the task. All critical performancemeasures must achieve a “GO” in order to achieve a minimum task proficiency rating of(P).Leader Performance Measures2-20. As noted within the performance measures as the proponent identified leadersteps within the performance measures for the task.Task Assessment23

Leader’s Guide to Objective Assessment of Training ProficiencyMarch 20172-21. The task proficiency rating is assessed by the Commander and recorded onthe T&EO. As shown in Figure 2-20, the overall proficiency assessment isdetermined by reviewi

Leader's Guide to Objective Assessment of Training Proficiency, the Leader's Guide has predominance. The Leader's Guide provides prescriptive guidance in the interim until AR 220-1, AR 350-1 and FM 7-0 are revised and updated. Background . 1-3. The Army needs a disciplined and objective linkage between assessing

Related Documents:

This Action Plan covers mental health and mental disorders across the life-course. It does not include substance use disorders. Table 1. Matrix: interface between Health 2020 and European Mental Health Action Plan Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 4 Objective 5 Objective 6 Objective 7 Inequities and social determinants 4 Governance 4

Independent Personal Pronouns Personal Pronouns in Hebrew Person, Gender, Number Singular Person, Gender, Number Plural 3ms (he, it) א ִוה 3mp (they) Sֵה ,הַָּ֫ ֵה 3fs (she, it) א O ה 3fp (they) Uֵה , הַָּ֫ ֵה 2ms (you) הָּ תַא2mp (you all) Sֶּ תַא 2fs (you) ְ תַא 2fp (you

work/products (Beading, Candles, Carving, Food Products, Soap, Weaving, etc.) ⃝I understand that if my work contains Indigenous visual representation that it is a reflection of the Indigenous culture of my native region. ⃝To the best of my knowledge, my work/products fall within Craft Council standards and expectations with respect to

1 Introduction to the Objective-C Interface 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 Objective-C data types 6 1.3 Invoking Objective-C methods 7 1.4 Defining Objective-C classes and methods 12 2 Objective-C Reference 18 alloc-init-object 18 autorelease 18 can-invoke-p 19 coerce-to-objc-class 20 coerce-to-selector 21 current-super 21 define-objc-class 22

is the amount of rth objective in the optimal solution and q r is the proportional satisfaction amount of rth objective relative to the normalizing factor. The objective function, maximizes multi-dimensional utility summed across all objectives. Each objective is weighted. The second equation sums the level of each objective into the variable gl r

With this guide at your fingertips, you have made an incredible decision to start an entrepreneurial journey that will be full of purpose, fulfillment, and freedom. . Gold Heart Mentor Platinum Heart Mentor Five Heart Servant Leader Four Heart Servant Leader Servant Leader Two Heart Partner One Heart Three Heart Leader Senior Leader Executive

Compass. Educational Leader Level 1 (EDL 1) – permits service as a school or district level leader Educational Leader Level 2 (EDL 2) – permits service as a school or district level leader for educators with successful leadership experience (has met the standards of effectiveness verifiabl

NORTH & WEST SUTHERLAND LOCAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 7th December 2006 at 12:00 Noon in the Rhiconich Hotel, Rhiconich. PRESENT: Dr Andreas Herfurt Lead Clinician Dr Moray Fraser CHP Medical Director Dr Alan Belbin GP Durness Dr Anne Berrie GP Locum Dr Cameron Stark Public Health Consultant Mrs Sheena Craig CHP General Manager Mrs Georgia Haire CHP Assistant .