CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 By A. L.

2y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
1.41 MB
9 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Grady Mosby
Transcription

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaALFREDO TERRAZASSenior Assistant Attorney GeneralvnLBERTE.BENNETTSupervising Deputy Attorney GeneralSHANA A. BAGLEY, State Bar No. 169423Deputy Attorney General5 JUSTIN R. SURBER, State Bar No. 226937Deputy Attorney General6 1515 Clay Street, 20 th FloorP.O. Box 705507. . ENDORSEDFILEDALAMEDA COUNTYJAN 2 2 2010CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURTBy A. Yvonne Bazzell. Deputy"89 NANCY E. O 'MALLEYDistrict Attorney of the County of AlamedalO LA WRENCE C. BLAZER, SBN 95598Assistant District AttorneyII SCOTT D. PATTON, SBN 148468Deputy District Attorney12 Consumer and Environmental Protection Division7677Street, Suite 650I13ELIZABETH A. EGANDistrict Attorney of the County of FresnMICHAEL C. BRUMMEL (236116)Deputy District Attorney of theCounty of FresnoConsumer Protection Unit929 L. StreetCA 937211415 Attorneys for: Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA16SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA17IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA18PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF19 CALIFORNIA,20CASE NO. RG09460505Plaintiff,STIPULATED JUDGMENT21v.22 BE GLAD, INC., a Cali forniaCorporation, M.l. GLAD, INC., a23 Cal ifornia corporation, SO GLAD, INC.,a Ca lifornia corporation, ALLGLAD,24 INC., a California corporation, andMAURICE IRVING GLAD,25 individually, and as C.E.O. of BEGLAD, INC., M.l. GLAD, INC., SO26 GLAD, INC., and ALLGLAD, INC.; andDOES 1 through 50,27Dept.: 23Judge: Hon. Winifi'ed Sm ithTrial Date: Not AssignedComplaint filed June 30, 200928STIPULATED JUDGMENT

Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Alameda County District Attorney2 Nancy E. O'Malley, and Fresno County District Attorney Elizabeth A. Egan ("Plaintiff' and/or3 "PEOPLE") and Defendants BE GLAD, INC ., a California Corporation, M.l. GLAD, INC., a4 California corporation, SO GLAD, INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., a California5 corporation, and MAURlCE IRVING GLAD, individually, (collectively "Defendant" and/or6 "Defendants") have entered into a Stipulation for Judgment wherein it is agreed that a Stipulated7 Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants.8NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:9I.The Parties have entered into a Stipulation for Judgment, a copy of which is attached10 hereto, marked as Exhibit I and fully incorporated by reference herein.II2.The Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter hereof and ofthe parties hereto.123.Venue as to all matters between the Parties relating hereto lies in this Court.1314SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, TRAINING AND EDUCATION FUND, COSTS OF LAWSUITAND INVESTIGATION, ATTORNEYS FEES AND ADMINSTRATIVE COSTSRECOVERYIS4.Defendants will pay to Plaintiff the sum of One Million Eight Hundred Thousand16( 1,800,000) Dollars. The sum of 1,800,000 is allocated and payable as follows:17a.Settlement Payment. Within 10 days following entry of the Stipulated18Judgment in the Civil Action, Defendants shall deliver three (3) cashiers19checks to the Office of the Attorney General in the total amount of20 966,667. Thes'e Settlement Payments are made pursuant to Business and21Professions Code sections 17203, 17206, 17207, 17535, 17535 .5 and 17536.22Pursuant to Government Code section 26506, said Settlement Payment23checks shall be payable to the prosecuting agencies bringing this Civil24Action as follows:25AgencyAmount26Attorney General of California, D.O.1. 483,334Alameda County District Attorney 241,666.50Fresno County District AttorneyI 241,666.502728STIPULATED JUDGMENT

b.Costs of Investigation, Suit and Attorneys' Fees in Civil Action. Within 102days of the entry of the Stipulated Judgment in this Civil Action, Defendants3shall pay, by cashiers check payable to the Bureau of Automotive Repair, the4costs of suit, including attorneys' fees, in this civil matter in the amount of5 90,000. Within 10 days of the entry of the Stipulated Judgment in this6Civil Action, Defendants shall pay, by cashiers check payable to the7Alameda County District Attorney, the costs of suit, including attorneys'8fees, in this civil matter in the amount of 241,666.50. Within 10 days of9the entry of the Stipulated Judgment in this Civil Action, Defendants shall10pay, by cashiers check payable to the Fresno County District Attorney, theIIcosts of suit, including attorneys' fees, in this civil matter in the amount of12 241,666.50.13c.Costs Recovery in Administrative Action. Within 10 days of the entry of the14Stipulated Judgment in this Civil Action, Defendants shall pay, by cashiers15check payable to the Bureau of Automotive Repair, the costs of investigation16and prosecution, including attorneys' fees, of the Administrative Action17entitled: In the Matter of the Accusation Against BE GLAD, INC., dba18MIDAS AUTO SERVICE CENTER,19President; M.I . GLAD, INC., dba MIDAS AUTO SERVICE CENTER,20MAURICE IRVING GLAD, President; and, SO GLAD, INC., dba MIDAS21AUTO SERVICE CENTER, MAURlCE IRVING GLAD, President, et a!.,22Bureau of Automotive Repair Case No. 77/07 and Office of Administrative23Hearings Case No. 2009022238, in the amount of 260,000.24d.Payment Method.MAURICE IRVING GLAD,All checks payable to the Alameda County District25Attorney, Fresno County District Attorney and the Office of the Attorney26General under the terms of the Settlement Agreement shall be delivered to27the Office of the Attorney General, Attention Justin Surber, 455 Golden28Gate Ave., Suite 11000, San Francisco CA 94102-7004 within 10 days of2STIPULATED JUDGMENT

the entry of the Stipulated Judgment in this Civil Action. All checks payable2to the Bureau of Automotive Repair under the terms of the Settlement3Agreement shall be delivered to Rick McLarty, Bureau of Automotive4Repair, Department of Consumer Affairs 10220 Systems Parkway, Suite B,5Sacramento, CA 95827 within 10 days of the entry of the Stipulated6Judgment in this Civil Action.7General's Office shall be deposited into the unfair competition law fund.89The money payable to the AttorneyINJUNCTIVE RELIEF5.Defendants agree that they shall be permanently enjoined and restrained pursuant to10 Business and Professions Code sections 17203 and 17535 from applying for or holding any licenseII or registration issued by the Bureau of Automotive Repair or any successor agency. Defendants12 further agree that they shall be permanently enjoined and restrained pursuant to Business and13 Professions Code sections 17203 and 17535, directly or indirectly, from engaging in any business14 that requires any type of license or registration issued by Bureau of Automotive Repair or any15 successor agency.It is expressly understood and agreed that Defendants may lease the real16 property they own to licensees/registrants of the Bureau of Automotive Repair and such leasing17 activity shall not violate the terms of this injunctive provision, as long as Defendants are not18 involved in the operation of the automotive repair business.19a.These injunctive provisions shall become effective 90 days following entry20of this Stipulated Judgment. Defendants shall be entitled to continue the21operation of their Midas Shop automotive repair businesses until the22effective date of these injunctive provisions. '236.The settlement in the Administrative Action (the "Administrative Settlement) is24 expressly incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Stipulated Judgment. A copy of25 the Administrative Settlement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit 2 and fully incorporated by26 reference herein. A violation of the terms and conditions of the Administrative Settlement shall27 constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this Stipulated Judgment.283STIPULATED JUDGMENTI

7.This Stipulated Judgment does not modify, alter or amend the Judgment entered2 June 30, 1989 in the case entitled People v. MI. Glad, Inc., e/ al., Superior Court of the State of3 California, County of Alameda, Case nos. H120168-4 and H120169-3 (the " 1989 Judgment and4 Injunction").The 1989 Judgment and Injunction shall remain in full force and effect as to5 Defendants herein. However, any purchaser of Defendants' Midas Shops will not be bound by or6 subject to the terms and conditions of the 1989 Judgment and Injunction, provided that any7 prospective purchaser is an independent third-party who is not related to MAURICE IRVING8 GLAD and that the purchase is otherwise conducted as an arms-length transaction. The 19899 Judgment and Injunction shall not and will not encumber the sale of Defendants' Midas Shop10 automotive repair businesses and the new purchaser will purchase the Midas Shops free and clearII of the 1989 Judgment and Injunction.12Notwithstanding anything stated herein, the Superior Court of the State of8.13 California, County of Alameda, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce, interpret and adjudicate any14 breach of the Stipulation for Judgment and Stipulated Judgment.1516N!17 DATED:. JA! , otnWINIFRED Y SMITHJudge of the Superior Court18 II I19 I II20 APPROVED AS TO FORM:21EDMUND G. BROWN, ATTORNEY GENERAL,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,2223 -2/ -'1 cJ j /0",---,1,-- 24 , COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATEOF CALIFORNIA4STIPULATED JUDGMENT

2 DATED:3! /I7//CJtof Alameda, AttorneySTATE OF CALIFORNlA456ELIZABETH A. EGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,COUNTYOFFRESNO,STATEOFCALIFORNIA78 DATED:9MICHAEL BRUMMEL, Deputy District Attorney,County of Fresno, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLEOF TI-JE STATE OF CALIFORNIA1011McCOY, MCMAHON, KOSS, MARKOWITZ andRAINES,1213 DATED:141516WILLIAM GAGEN, JR. attorney for Defendants BEGLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.l.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLAD1718KNOX, LEMMON, ANAPOLSKY & SCHRIMP,LLP1920 DATED:212223LOUIS J. ANAPOLSKY, attorney for DefendantsBE GLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.l.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE TRVINGGLAD24252627285STIPULATED JUDGMENT

12 DATED:SCOTT PATTON, Deputy District Attorney, Countyof Alameda, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THESTATE OF CALIFORNIA34ELIZABETH A. EGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,OFCOUNTYOFFRESNO,STATECALIFORNIA5678 DATED:I:;L/ /7I/ OfJ910IIMcCOY, MCMAHON, KOSS, MARKOWITZ andRAINES,1213 DATED:141516WILLIAM GAGEN, JR. attorney for Defendants BEGLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.l.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLAD1718KNOX, LEMMON, ANAPOLSKY & SCHRIMP,LLP1920 DATED:212223LOUIS J. ANAPOLSKY, attorney for DefendantsBE GLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.l.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLAD24252627285STIPULATED JUDGMENT

SCOTI PATION, Deputy District Attorney, Countyof Alameda, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THESTATE OF CALIFORNIAELIZABETH A. EGAN, DISTRICT ATIORNEY,COUNTYOFFRESNO,STATEOFCALIFORNIAMICHAEL BRUMMEL, Deputy District Attorney,County of Fresno, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLEOF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAMcCOY, MCMAHON, KOSS, MARKOWITZ andRAINES, --,--.-- . , .BEGLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.1.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLADKNOX, LEMMON, ANAPOLSKY & SCHRJMP,LLPLOUIS J. ANAPOLSKY, attorney for DefendantsBE GLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.l.GLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC., aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLAD5STIPULATED JUDGMENT

' . .112 DATED:SCOTT PATTON, Deputy District Attorney, Countyof Alameda, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THESTATE OF CALIFORNIA345ELIZABETH A. EGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,COUNTYOFFRESNO,STATEOFCALIFORNIA .678 DATED:MICHAEL BRUMMEL, Deputy District Attorney,County of Fresno, Attorney for Plaintiff PEOPLEOF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA910McCOY, MCMAHON, KOSS, MARKOWITZ andRAINES,111213 DATED:WILLIAM GAGEN, JR. attorney for Defendants BEGLAD, INC., a California Corporation, M.LGLAD, INC., a California corporation, SO GLAD,INC., a California corporation, ALLGLAD, INC. , aCalifornia corporation, and MAURICE IRVINGGLAD14151617KNOX, LEMMON, ANAPOLSKY & SCHRJMP,LLP181920DAT % « l!\ attolr#Y for Vej'endantsCorporation, M.LC tfMlri:!t-c:dTporation, SO GLAD,Cal.itolmla corporation, ALLGLAD , INC. , acorporation, and MAURICE IRVING21'-'i11UUliUI'''222324252627285STIPULATED JUDGMENT

District Attorney of the County of Fresn MICHAEL C. BRUMMEL (236116) Deputy District Attorney of the County of Fresno Consumer Protection Unit 929 . L. Street CA 93721 . Attorneys for: Plaintiff PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA . PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v.

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Clerk of the Superior Court *** Electronically Filed *** 03/15/2021 8:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2020-014553 03/12/2021 Docket Code 019 Form V000A Page 1 CLERK OF THE COURT HONORABLE JOHN R. HANNAH JR R. Sheppard Deputy ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY JOHN DOUGLAS WILENCHIK v. ADRIAN FONTES, et al. THOMAS PURCELL LIDDY

The Clerk of Court also serves as the Clerk of Court for the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. The Clerk of Court reports directly to the presiding judge. This is a professional and highly visible position that has broad and overarching responsibilities. The Clerk