Front End Engineering Design Of Linde- BASF Advanced Post .

3y ago
114 Views
5 Downloads
949.61 KB
18 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jayda Dunning
Transcription

Front End Engineering Design of LindeBASF Advanced Post-CombustionCO2 Capture Technology at a SouthernCompany Natural Gas-Fired PowerPlantDE-FE0031847Landon Lunsford, PISouthern Company ServicesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Energy Technology LaboratoryCarbon Capture Front End Engineering Design Studies and CarbonSafe2020 Integrated Review WebinarAugust-17-19 2020Research & Development

DisclaimerThis presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency ofthe United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor anyagency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express orimplied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or processdisclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service bytradename, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constituteor imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United StatesGovernment or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressedherein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government orany agency thereof.2

Project Overview and ObjectivesProject Overview: Funding: 7,101,737– DOE: 5,674,533– Recipients: 1,427,204 Work Period: 10/1/2019 - 9/30/2021Project Objectives: Complete a Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) study for installing theLinde-BASF advanced aqueous amine solvent-based post-combustion CO2capture technology (PCC) at an existing domestic natural gas-fired combinedcycle (NGCC) power plant within Southern Company’s portfolio of assets. Provide a reference case for a more detailed understanding of CO2 capturecosts in a commercial application that will support the development of costeffective, environmentally sound, and high performing technologies for thereduction of CO2 emissions from NGCC plants.3

Linde-BASF Post-Combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) TechnologyReduced capital costs / energycosts Optimized BASF OASE bluesolvent Efficient CO2 capture from lowpressure sources Longer solvent life (can handlehigher O2 conc) Lower solvent circulation rateNotable Linde-BASF processimprovements(C, E) Dry bed water wash design tominimize solvent losses(G) Stripper regeneration at 3.4 barsreducing CO2 compressor cost andpower consumption(I) Advanced Stripper InterstageHeater to reduce regenerator steamconsumption.4

Linde-BASF Post-Combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) Technology Technology tested from 2009-2017 in two pilot plants– Different flue gas sources– Wide range of flue gas compositions and impurities– Achieved Technology Readiness Level of 6– Multiple process design improvements achieved OASE blue solvent– Advanced aqueous amine solvent– Favorable kinetics and reduced steam energy requirements– Demonstrated solvent stability– Lower solvent circulation ratePrior NGCC CO2 capture studies conducted in2011 and 2018 will be leveraged5

Project MilestonesTask/SubtaskNumberMilestone Title &DescriptionPlannedCompletion DateVerification Method1.1Project Kickoff Meeting11/22/2019Presentation file1.1Updated ProjectManagement Plan2/28/2020PMP file2.2Host site evaluation andselection, including designbasis4/29/2020Quarterly ProgressReport3.2Basic engineering complete9/30/2020Quarterly ProgressReport4.1HAZOP complete10/30/2020Quarterly ProgressReport, HAZOP report4.0Front-End engineeringpackages complete6/30/2021FEED Study Report5.3Finalized cost and scheduleanalysis9/30/2021Topical Report6

Success Criteria and Decision PointsDecision PointDateSuccess CriteriaHost site selected4/29/2020Letter of confirmation from selectedhost site; design basis created for thatsiteBasic EngineeringCompleted Successfully9/30/2020Solvent system basic designcomplete. All information required toconduct initial HAZOP complete.Front-End EngineeringDesign Complete6/30/2021All design packages ready forequipment/material estimation fromvendors. HAZOP recommendationsreviewed and addressed.Cost and ScheduleEstimate Complete9/30/2021Cost and schedule estimatecompleted and reviewed7

Host Sites for Evaluation Alabama Power’s Plant Barry Units 6 and 7– Located in Bucks, AL– Each unit: (2) GE 7FA gas turbines - (1) Vogt triple pressureHRSG - (1) GE TC2F D11 steam turbine, 525 MW net– Began commercial operation in May 2001– Estimated storage costs at 3-4/ton from extensive prefeasibility geological studies Mississippi Power’s Plant Daniel Units 3 and 4– Located in Moss Point, MS– Each unit: (2) GE 7FA gas turbines - (1) Vogt triple pressureHRSG - (1) GE TC2F D11 steam turbine, 525 MW net– Began commercial operation in May 2001– Estimated storage costs at 3-5/ton from pre-feasibilitygeological studies8

Task 2: Requirements Definition and Host Site Evaluation Linde and SCS evaluated performance,utility availability, regulatory impacts, andplot space to select Plant Daniel host site A basis of design detailing major boundaryconditions and operating scenarios wascompleted Developed PCC plant concept:– 2 PCC Compression trains withcommon utility supply and facilitiessupport infrastructure– Each train includes 2 DCC columns, 2absorbers, and 1 desorber column.– Each compression train includescompressor w/ dryer and processcondensate handling3D design for 550 MW PCC plant based on earlier work9

Task 3: Conceptual DesignLinde Scope (ISBL):– BASF completed basic design basedon OASE blue solvent technology,including preliminary heat andmaterial balances and key equipmentsizing– Linde has progressed basicengineering including development ofthe first version of PFD, detailed heat& material balances, P&ID, and plotplan.SCS Scope (OSBL):– Evaluating optimum integration ofthe steam cycle with the carboncapture system– Evaluating integration of requiredutilities, including necessaryadditions/upgrades– Evaluating permitting requirementsfor air and effluents– Reconciliation between Linde andSCS design standards10

Basic Engineering in DevelopmentKey progress:- Design basis documentdetailed to summarizequality & quantity of utilityrequirements and conditionsat scope transitions- Continued Linde-SCSinteraction to define utilitysource points & availability- Integration aspects relatedto steam cycle, flue gas ductlayout considered11

Synergy: DE-FE00031888, Project ECO2S Phase III 21.9M project, led by Southern States Energy Board (SSEB) Project partners include 16 universities, labs, and private companies Project remains under negotiation Prepare for a regional CO2 host site in Kemper County, MS– Previous phase identified potential for complex capable of storing 900 millionmetric tons of CO 2– Current efforts will fully characterize the site through additional test well drills– CO2 to be sourced from Plant Ratcliffe (NGCC), Plant Daniel (NGCC), and PlantMiller (Coal) Project deliverables– Final site geologic characterization– CO2 capture feasibility assessments for proposed host sites– UIC Class VI Permit to Construct application12

Challenges due to COVID-19: Travel restrictions eliminated the possibility of having inperson kickoff and host site visits– Team was able to build rapport and select the host site through virtualmeetings HAZOP scheduled at the end of Task 3 / beginning of Task 4– Travel restrictions are expected to still be in place– There is a 7-hour time difference between the Linde Engineering teamand the SCS engineering team– Team is exploring options for rescheduling or executing virtually13

Summary Southern Company and Linde assembled a diverse team to develop a FEED studywith detailed cost and schedule estimates. Despite major changes in work practices and plans due to the COVID-19pandemic, the project team has adapted and continued the work.– No site visits and no in-person team kickoff.– Remote working conditions will continue for foreseeable future for many team members. The project team is working to complete basic engineering by 3 rd quarter.– Primary basis of design complete.– Initial Process Flow Diagrams complete.– Equipment specifications and preliminary P&IDs in development. HAZOP will be conducted as basic engineering shifts to detailed design.– Virtual options are being considered due to travel restrictions; time zone differences pose achallenge.14

Questions?15

Appendix

Project Organization Chart17

Project Gantt ChartTask 1.0 - Project Management & PlanningSubtask 1.1 - Project ManagementSubtask 1.2 - Project AdministrationSubtask 1.3 - Project ControlsMilestones:-Project kickoff meeting-Updated Project Management PlanTask 2.0 - Scope Definition and Design BasisSubtask 2.1 - Requirements DefinitionSubtask 2.2 - Host Site Evaluation and SelectionMilestones:-Host site evaluation and selection including designbasisTask 3.0 - Conceptual DesignSubtask 3.1 - Basic DesignSubtask 3.2 - Basic EngineeringMilestones:-Basic engineering completeTask 4. 0 - Front End Engineering Design StudySubtask 4.1 - Process EngineeringSubtask 4.2 - Mechanical EngineeringSubtask 4.3 - Instrumentation, Controls andElectrical EngingeeringSubtask 4.4 - Civil/Structural EngineeringSubtask 4.5 - Facilities EngineeringMilestones:-HAZOP complete-Fronte-End Engineering packages completeTask 5.0 - Cost and Schedule EstimationSubtask 5.1 - Procurement and Fabrication PlanningSubtask 5.2 - Construction Management andPlanningSubtask 5.3 - Cost and Schedule EstimationMilestones:-Finalized cost and schedule analysisStart Date End DateQ11/29/2020 9/30/20211/29/2020 9/30/20211/29/2020 9/30/20211/29/2020 9/30/2021Q2Q3Budget Period 110/1/19-9/30/2021Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8 0/20216/30/2021 9/30/20219/30/2021 18

Linde-BASF advanced aqueous amine solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture technology (PCC) at an existing domestic natural gas-fired combined cycle (NGCC) power plant within Southern Company’s portfolio of assets. Provide a reference case for a more detailed understanding of CO2 capture

Related Documents:

Taekwondo (Korean Translation): "The Art of the Hand & Feet" ALL PUNCHES- MIDDLE SECTION L FRONT R FRONT R FRONT R FRONT L FRONT L FRONT L FRONT L FRONT MIDDLE Ready Position R Foot Steps To. R Knifehand Strike R Single Inner Forearm Block L FRONT 1 2 3 R Side Kick L Outer Cresent Kick R Double Outer Forearm Block (KI BON) ONE-STEP #2 R .

Front-End Engineering & Design: Project Tundra Carbon Capture System Project Number FE0031845 Gerry Pfau Minnkota Power Cooperative U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Capture Front End Engineering Design Studies and CarbonSafe 2020 Integrated Review Webinar August-17-19 2020

RaaS Front End Engineering Design & Peer Review Process Introduction to the RaaS FEED - Front End Engineering Design - Report The accompanying document 'E2a.2 FEED Report' has been developed by RaaS project partner E.ON in close consultation with SSEN, and is the document issued to external reviewers to invite feedback on the proposals for

Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Production Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Textile Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, other related Engineering discipline Energy Resources Engineering (ERE) The students’ academic background should be: Mechanical Power Engineering, Energy .

rear front base pairs rear front 1-pc multi-slot bases ext multi-slot bases rear front rear front anschutz . rear front base pairs rear front 1-pc multi-slot bases ext multi-slot bases rear front rear front} topper 30, 22 jet & mod 158 (pre 1973) 18 60a (48064)} handy rifle 82 (48082) herters} j9 45 (48045) 46 (48046) 402 (48108) s45 (48226 .

Occluded front: when the cold front catches the warm front As the fronts circle the low, the cold front generally moves faster If the cold front catches the warm front, we get an occluded front (or occlusion) where the two cold air masses meet schematic occluded front (purple)

Q23 The fifth step in the Design Thinking process serves as the junction between what? A The Front End and Back End of Innovation. B The Front End and Mid Zone of Innovation. C The Mid Zone and Back End of Innovation. D The Fuzzy Front End and the Messy Back End. Q24 Design Thinking asks 3 fundamental questions about each proposed solution.

Careers in Engineering Guide the brighter choice. Contents ABOUT LSBU 4–5 BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING 6–7 CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 8–9 CIVIL ENGINEERING 10–11 ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 12–13 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 14–15 MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING 16–17 PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING 18–19 An engineering degree is a big challenge to take on. There is no denying .