Impact Of Early Help On Preventing Escalation To Statutory .

1y ago
40 Views
1 Downloads
410.17 KB
27 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 6m ago
Upload by : Kaleb Stephen
Transcription

Impact of Early Help on PreventingEscalation to Statutory Services ReviewREPORT OF THECHILDREN’S SERVICESSCRUTINY COMMITTEELondon Borough of IslingtonJune 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYImpact of Early Help on Preventing Escalation to Statutory Services ReviewAim To analyse the extent to which services provided by Islington Council and its partners arepreventing needs escalating to the point children, young people and families needstatutory intervention (statutory social work services and youth offending service). To highlight areas of good practice. To make recommendations to further improve outcomes for families with multipleproblems.EvidenceThe review ran from September 2014 until April 2015 and evidence was received from a variety ofsources:1. Presentations from Council OfficersRuth Beecher, Service Manager for Early Help for FamiliesLucinda Hibberd-French, Deputy Service Manager with responsibility for the Families FirstserviceEllen Ryan, Islington Learning and Working (ILW) Manager2. Site visitsFamilies First (Highbury and Hornsey Team), Holland Walk Area Housing Office, N19Families First (Holloway and Canonbury Team), The Exchange, N7Islington Families Intensive Team (IFIT), New River Green Children’s Centre, N13.Documentary evidenceImpact of Early Help on preventing escalation to statutory services, background report –October 2014Families First Early Impact Report, Executive SummaryFamily Intervention Employment Advisor Evaluation –July 2014Families First mystery shopping feedback – November 2014Data from exit interviews with former Families First service users – March 2015Evaluation of Islington’s Early Help Family Support Services, Executive Summary – April 2015Families First service specification – April 20144. Information from witnessesElaine Sheppard, Operational Manager of Family ActionMairead McDonnell, Deputy Head of Newington Green School,Win Bolton, Camden and Islington Mental Health Foundation TrustMichelle Tolfrey, Camden and Islington Mental Health Foundation TrustHazel Jordan, CASA Islington Community Alcohol ServiceFamilies using the Families First and IFIT servicesFamilies First and IFIT staff5. Information about a comparable service of another local authorityStella Clarke, Programme Director for Preventative Services, London Borough of LambethMarcella McHugh, Delivery Lead Multi-Agency Team 1, London Borough of LambethGeraldine Abrahams, Delivery Lead Multi-Agency Team 2, London Borough of Lambeth1

Main FindingsOverall the Committee was impressed with how Islington’s early help services operated. FamiliesFirst and IFIT provided comprehensive support to families with complex and multiple issues. Thesupport offered was wide-ranging and practical; focusing on issues such as housing, benefits, socialproblems and relationships with schools, as well as parenting, mental health, employability andsubstance abuse. Each family was assigned a support worker who was the primary contactthroughout their intervention.The Committee was pleased with the level of integration between early help services, statutoryservices, and partner organisations such as schools. A range of supplementary wrap-aroundservices were available which focused on issues such as mental health, employment and substanceabuse.The Council offered a single point of contact for families requiring support via the IslingtonChildren’s Services Contact Team. Families could self-refer to the team, or could be referred byprofessionals with parental consent. This method was considered to be efficient and less complexfor service users; the single point of contact enabled families to be placed with the right supportservice first time, which meant that families did not need to repeat information multiple times todifferent agencies.The evidence received from service users was overwhelmingly positive, with all of the familiesinterviewed praising the early help services. The families indicated that, as well as providingpractical support, early help services had helped to increase their confidence and raise theiraspirations. Support workers received particular praise from service users, and were described asprofessional, friendly, approachable, dedicated, knowledgeable, non-judgemental and good withchildren.Islington’s early help services used a mentoring and supportive approach which was intended toempower service users and build resilience. The services also took a holistic “whole family”approach where support was offered to parents, children and siblings. These approaches were wellreceived by families. Parents felt engaged in their own support, and that early help services werebeing delivered in cooperation with them.Many of the families interviewed compared the welcoming approach and positive experiences theyhad with early help services to the negative experiences they had with other services. In particular,families had little trust in social services, housing providers and schools and found these servicesdifficult to work with. Although early help services worked to build the resilience and increase theconfidence and independence of service users, the Committee speculated if more could be done tomake other council services more approachable to the borough’s most vulnerable residents. For thisreason the Committee recommend that the Council’s early help services’ successes in creating safeand trusting relationships with families be noted, and consideration be given to how similarapproaches to positive relationship building can be adopted by other services, including but notexclusive of schools and housing.Many of the families interviewed had not heard of either Families First or IFIT before theirintervention began. It was thought that this unfamiliarity led to anxiety about engaging with theservices. Some service users had assumed the early help services would be similar to the statutoryservices they either had negative experiences with or negative perceptions of, and were thensurprised when this was not the case. The Committee also noted the stigma attached to accessinghelp and thought that targeted promotion could help to normalise access to help. Following the workcarried out by the London Borough of Lambeth to address these issues, the Committee recommendthat the early help services appoint former service users as ambassadors to work in the community,both publicising the service and removing the stigma of accessing early help services.2

Another improvement which could be made is better publicising that families may change supportworker in exceptional circumstances. It was reported that some families had changed supportworker, and others were unaware of this possibility.Users of both services interviewed by the Committee expressed their anxiety at their case beingclosed and some worried they would not be able to cope after their intervention ended. Someservice users explained that early help services carry out a great deal of advocacy work, liaisingwith schools, housing providers and others on their behalf, and worried that they would not be ableto engage positively without the help of their support worker. Some families suggested that a longertime period for interventions was needed; however officers suggested that a fixed and relativelyshort timescale was most effective in focusing service users on achieving their goals and leaning tolive independently. Many of the families interviewed expressed that they were socially isolated and itwas considered that their anxieties about their intervention ending were partially connected to theirlack of a social support network. This presented problems as it was suggested that those without asupport network were more likely to require follow up support from early help services. TheCommittee heard some evidence to suggest that support workers helped to reduce social isolationby recommending social groups to service users; however the Committee considered that furtherwork was needed in this particular area. It was recommended that early help services better prepareservice users for their intervention ending by working further to build resilience, which will reducesocial isolation and empower families to live independent and fulfilled lives;The Committee gave a great deal of thought to how the success of early help services could bemeasured. It was agreed that any measure of success must be focused on outcomes for families,however as the purpose of early intervention programmes is to turn around families beforesignificant problems arise, it can be difficult to evaluate the outcomes and impact of the servicequantitatively.Internal assessment carried out by the services included measuring how families had progressed onthe ‘family star’ assessment tool, mystery shopping exercises, exit interviews with service users andcross-auditing the work of other teams. The Council had commissioned an external evaluation ofthe service, which concluded that Islington’s early help services had been ‘successful in directingtheir services at families who face the ‘priority issues’ outlined in their service specifications’;however noted that that no local authority had yet demonstrated a reduction in need for statutoryservices since the introduction of early help strategies and the Troubled Families agenda. Theevaluation also highlighted that early help services appeared to support a disproportionately highnumber of younger children and recommended that the service should carry out more targeted workto engage families with adolescents. The Committee recommended that the service adopt thisrecommendation.The available evidence suggested that Islington’s early help services had a positive impact onfamilies and led to improved outcomes for children. There were positive indications that early helpservices were reducing demand on statutory services, however not enough evidence was availableto make a firm conclusion on this point. To ensure that the services continue to perform favourably,the Committee recommend that the internal monitoring and evaluation of early help servicescontinue to be prioritised through further exit interviews and mystery shopping exercises. Theservice may wish to consider the methodology of this type of internal evaluation to ensure that thewidest possible range of views on the service is sought.The Committee noted how early help services worked with other support services and emphasisedthe importance of joined up working to achieve the best outcomes for families. For example, earlyhelp services could be supplemented by wrap-around employment support services which thoughtto be crucial in improving outcomes for workless families. Service users were often most successfulin finding employment when they considered employment to be a priority and understood how thiswould initiate change in other areas of their life. Employment could help to improve a family’sfinancial position, increase aspirations, and broaden social networks. The Committee noted that the3

annual cost of the wrap-around iWork service was 269,000 and considered this good value giventhe number of people helped into employment.The Committee also noted the high prevalence of mental health need Islington and that a significantproportion of early help clients needed related support. It was thought that 46% of families engagingwith Families First had a mental health need; these were often complex and related to trauma. TheCommittee was particularly concerned with the mental health of early help service users andsuggested that better targeting of mental health services could improve outcomes for these families.For this reason it was recommended that, through the Health and Wellbeing Board, the Councilwork with its partners, such as clinical commissioning groups, to ensure better access to effectivemental health provision;The Committee was pleased with the integration and wrap-around approach adopted by the serviceand the number of projects available to assist families with particular needs. It was recommendedthat the Executive continue to recognise mental health, school attendance, domestic violence andparental employment as key factors in achieving family wellbeing.In carrying out the review the Committee asked service users and support workers for theirsuggestions to improve the early help services. Some suggestions were made which the Committeethought warranted further consideration. It was thought that a greater emphasis could be given tohelping families to access other services and support available to them. One theme that emergedthrough the review was that some families needed help in accessing the Council’s online services.Demonstrations of how to access these from council facilities or local libraries could be beneficial.Support workers also expressed that some families may benefit from cultural and social trips andoutings, and although the service could not fund these directly, it was understood that some localtheatres had outreach schemes and the service could help families access these and other similaropportunities. It was noted that such trips can inspire and raise the aspirations of young people,strengthen family relationships and reduce social isolation. The Committee recommended that, tocombat social isolation, consideration be given to how information about cultural and socialopportunities can be more accessible to families and staff.Some support workers suggested that increased access to remote working would be useful, as thiswould give them the ability to take technology on home visits. However officers said that this wouldrequire a significant financial outlay and may not achieve value for money given the relatively smallamount of written work completed by support workers. It was also noted that staff had laptops toenable home working when appropriate and the Council was in the process of upgrading its caserecording system which would lead to efficiencies.Support workers also suggested that a discretionary ‘crisis fund’ could be available, offering smallamounts of money ( 10-20) for families in extreme crisis situations. It was understood thatChildren’s Social Care had a similar budget. The Committee noted that such a fund would addadditional costs to the service which would be difficult find, however the Committee recommendedthat officers investigate if such a fund could be provided within existing budgets.ConclusionsThe Committee found Islington’s early help services to be of a high quality. The services workedwell with partner agencies, were integrated with other support services, and took a comprehensive‘whole family’ approach. The services were very well received by service users, with familiespraising the accessibility of the service and the work of support workers. There was evidence thatthe Council’s early help services and associated wrap-around support services were leading tobetter outcomes for families, and there were positive indications that early help services werereducing the demand for statutory services. It was known that school attendances were increasing,parents were being helped into paid employment, and parents had expressed that they feelempowered and more confident as a result of their interaction with the services. Although there was4

scope for further innovation, the Committee supported the work of the Council’s early help servicesand recommended that the Executive continues to prioritise the early help approach. It was hopedthat continuing the early help approach over a sustained period of time would further decreasedemand for statutory services.In carrying out the review, the Committee has met with officers, support workers and members ofthe public to gain a balanced view. The Committee would like to thank all witnesses that gaveevidence in relation to the scrutiny. The Executive is asked to endorse the Committee’srecommendations.Recommendations1. That the Executive continue to prioritise the Early Help approach to preventing escalationto statutory services;2. That the Council’s early help services’ successes in creating safe and trustingrelationships with families be noted, and consideration be given to how similarapproaches to positive relationship building can be adopted by other services, includingbut not exclusive of schools and housing;3. That early help services better prepare service users for their intervention ending byworking further to build resilience, which will reduce social isolation and empowerfamilies to live independent and fulfilled lives;4. That the Executive continue to prioritise mental health, school attendance, domesticviolence and parental employment as key factors in achieving family wellbeing;5. That, through the Health and Wellbeing Board, the Council work with its partners, suchas clinical commissioning groups, to ensure better access to effective mental healthprovision;6. That consideration be given to introducing ‘Early Help Ambassadors’, residentvolunteers that can assist with outreach, promotion, and reducing the stigma ofaccessing help;7. That the internal monitoring and evaluation of early help services continue to beprioritised through further exit interviews and mystery shopping exercises;8. To combat social isolation, consideration be given to how information about cultural andsocial opportunities can be more accessible to families and staff;9. That officers investigate if a discretionary fund to support families in extreme crisissituations could be provided within existing budgets;10. That the service adopts the recommendation of the external evaluation to work furtherwith families with adolescent children, and adolescent children themselves.5

MEMBERSHIP OF THE CHILDREN’S SERVICES SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – 2014/15Councillors:Councillor Kaya Comer Schwartz (Chair)Councillor Nick Ward (Vice-Chair)Councillor Alice DonovanCouncillor Michelline Safi NgongoCouncillor Dave PoyserCouncillor Nurullah TuranCouncillor Diarmaid WardCouncillor Nick WayneCo-opted members:James Stephenson, Secondary Parent GovernorErol Baduna, Primary Parent GovernorMary Clement, Roman Catholic DioceseSubstitutes:Councillor Mouna Hamitouche MBECouncillor Angela PicknellCouncillor James CourtCouncillor Satnam GillCouncillor Asima Shaikh (to February 2015)Acknowledgements:The Committee would like to thank all the witnesses who gave evidence to the review.Officer Support:Nikki Ralph – Children’s Partnership Development and Strategy ManagerCathy Blair – Director, Targeted and Specialist Children’s ServicesJonathan Moore and Zoe Crane – Democratic Services6

1.Introduction1.1 The Committee commenced the review in September 2014 with the following aims: to analyse the extent to which services provided by Islington Council and its partners arepreventing needs escalating to the point children, young people and families need statutoryintervention (statutory social work services and youth offending service); to highlight areas of good practice; to make recommendations to further improve outcomes for families with multiple problems.1.2 In carrying out the review the Committee met with Council officers, service users, supportworkers from both the Families First and IFIT teams, and representatives of partnerorganisations. Visits were carried out to offices which the Families First and IFIT services operatefrom, and the Committee also considered a range of written evidence including evaluationdocuments and service specifications.National context1.3 Early Help services were provided within the context of the Working Together to SafeguardChildren statutory guidance. This set out the legislative requirements and expectations onindividual services to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. The guidance identified thatproviding early help is more effective in promoting the welfare of children than reacting later.1.4 The guidance required local agencies to provide early help services and to work together toidentify and assess families which may benefit from those services. In particular, ear

statutory intervention (statutory social work services and youth offending service). To highlight areas of good practice. To make recommendations to further improve outcomes for families with multiple problems. Evidence The review ran from September 2014 until April 2015 and evidence was received from a variety of sources: 1.

Related Documents:

The Impact of the (Early) Cold War on American Society An Online Professional Development Seminar Michael Kazin Professor of History Georgetown University . americainclass.org 2 . Billy Graham, Radio Sermon, 1953 . The Impact of the (Early) Cold War americainclass.org 11 Graham Crusade, 1957. The Impact of the (Early) Cold War

A child centred approach to safeguarding 9 A co-ordinated approach – safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility 11 Chapter 1: Assessing need and providing help 13 Early help 13 Identifying children and families who would benefit from early help 13 Effective assessment of the need for early help 15 Provision of effective early help services 16

2 IIG IMPACT REPORT 2019 CONTENTS AUTHORS: DR ERIN CASTELLAS, CHIEF IMPACT OFFICER JOSHUA ZAIL, IMPACT ANALYST 3 About Us 5 Our Impact at a Glance 6 Our Performance Highlights 7 Renewable Energy 9 Venture Capital: Giant Leap Fund 11 Real Estate & Place-based Investing 13 Catalyst Fund 14 IIG Operational Impact 15 Our Impact Processes 17 About the Impact Management Project

The Early Colleges in this study yielded significant and meaningful improvements in almost every student outcome examined. Early College students were benefitting from their Early College experience beyond high school, and we expect these benefits to continue. For example, Early College students may earn more college degrees, may accrue less

Impact Early College High School at Lee College Application GCCISD 2012 Recruitment Packet Below is the application to the Impact Early College High School at Lee College. The deadline to return the application is Tuesday, April 10th, 2012 to your 8th grade counselor. Early College High Sc

Covid-19: Impact on schools and early childhood services Page 1 Covid-19: Impact on schools and early childhood services Interim Report, August 2020 Overview ERO has a comprehensive and fast-tracked work programme underway to understand the ongoing impact of Covid-19 on students, services and schools, and on teaching and learning

Context-Sensitive Help: For help in a particular part of Medisoft, click the area for which you need help and press F1. The help topic for that area will appear. Main Help File: To access the main help file, click the Help menu and click Medisoft Help. The main help file will appear, displaying the Contents tab. Use the Contents tab to view

between completion and impact assessment, methods used to assess impact, and level of impact identified. Thirty-one studies reported on policy impact, 17 on clinic ian behaviour or informing clinical practice, three on a combined category such as policy and clinician impact, and 12 on wider elements of impact (health gain, patient benefit,

3.V Impact on Demand and Supply of Rural Labour 20 3.VI Impact on Agriculture Marketing 22 3.VII Impact on Banking Services 24 3.VIII Impact on Micro-finance activities of SHG and NBFC-MFI 27 3.IX Impact on Activities of FPOs and FCs 29 3.X Impact on MSMEs 30 3.XI Conclusions 33 3.XII Policy Implications/Action Points 33

Peer relationships in early childhood: Current trends and future directions. Early Education and Development, 10, 233-240. Brownell, C. & Hazen, N. (Eds) (1999). Early Peer Relations, invited special issue of Early Education and Development, 10 (3). NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1998). Early child care and self-control, compliance and

T.E.A.C.H. Early Childhoodâ PENNSYLVANIA Certification Only Scholarship What is the Purpose of the T.E.A.C.H. Early Childhood Certification Only Scholarship? The purpose of the T.E.A.C.H. Early Childhood Certification Only Scholarship is to assist early childhood teachers in obtaining their PA Early Childhood Education (PreK-4) teaching certificate.

Early Years Practitioner (Early Years Educator) 3605-03 April 2014 Version 4.0 (June 2016) O OK. 2 City & Guilds Level 3 Diploma for the Early Years Practitioner (Early Years Educator) Qualification at a glance Subject area Childcare City & Guilds number 3605 Age group approved 16

Early Years practitioners to identify the need for additional All Early Years providers are required to have support as early as possible. 2. Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0 - 25 years - 2014 (SEND Code of Practice) Providers of Early Years education, that is all Early Years providers in the maintained, private .

Creating Early Learning Environments OVERVIEW OF PLAY AND EXPLORATION: EARLY LEARNING PROGRAM GUIDE Play and Exploration: Early Learning Program Guidewas distributed to the early learning and child care sector in the spring of 2008. The Guide is a resource for early childhood educa- tors to promote high quality, age-appropriate, play-based learning experiences for young chil-

Understand the importance of early childhood education for 0-6 years Learn the need and scope of early childhood education. 18.2 Importance/ Need for early childhood care and education 18.2.1 Significance of early childhood years i. Early childhood is a period of life not just quantitatively different from that of an adult

A curriculum based assessment. Used as an on-going assessment tool to track the progress of the children we serve. Components of the HELP HELP Strands HELP Checklist HELP Charts HELP Activity guide HELP at Home HELP when the parent has disabilities

Getting help and contacting Dell Self-help resources You can get information and help on Dell products and services using these self-help resources: Table 20. Self-help resources Information about Dell products and services www.dell.com Dell Help & Support app Get started app Accessing help In Windows search, type Help and Support, and press Enter.

GINA Help me please help me help help help please help please help please please help me please- THE SOUND OSCILLATES BETWEEN HOW IT SOUNDED IN THE ROOM AND HOW IT SOUNDED DOWN THE PHONE. . RICH Numbers don’t lie mate. DYLAN Yeah, and I’m still ahead. RICH But the gap is clos

early childhood education in Nigeria, specifically the geographical location of Ikeja, Lagos State. The specific objectives include the following: To examine the impact of parents in early childhood years. To investigate if the socio-demographic characteristics of the parents have an impact on early childhood education.

Early Childhood Teachers, Early Interventionists, and Early Childhood Special Educators Instructions This document has been developed to help early learning educators create individual professional development plans (IPDPs) for their professional growth and improvement. IPDPs include specific, concrete professional