Disproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring Protocol

2y ago
8 Views
3 Downloads
981.26 KB
23 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Maxine Vice
Transcription

Disproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring ProtocolGeorgia Department of EducationDivision for Special Education Services and Supports1870 Twin Towers East205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SEAtlanta, GA 30334

Table of ContentsIntroduction to the Disproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring Protocol.iiiDisproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring Protocol . 1Focus Area I - School-wide Approaches and Prereferral Interventions .5Focus Area II - Child Find . 7Focus Area III - Evaluation and Reevaluation . 9Focus Area IV - Eligibility Determination .12Focus Area V - Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) .15Focus Area VI - Discipline . 17Georgia Department of EducationDr. John D. Barge, State School SuperintendentNovember2013ii

Introduction to the Disproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring ProtocolThe Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) is required by the reauthorized Individuals with DisabilitiesEducation Act (IDEA) to make determinations for disproportionality and provide for a review of the policies,procedures and practices to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Act. Disproportionality is acomprehensive construct that requires determinations in several different categories.Determination 1: Significant DisproportionalityEach state that receives assistance under Part B of the Act, and the Secretary of the Interior, must providefor the collection and examination of data to determine if significant disproportionality based on race andethnicity is occurring in the state and the local educational agencies (LEAs) of the State with respect to: The identification of children as children with disabilities, including the identification ofchildren with disabilities in accordance with a particular impairment described in section602(3) of the Act;The placement in particular educational settings of these children; andThe incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary actions, including suspensions andexpulsions. [34CFR300.646(a)][20U.S.C.1418(d)(1)]Determination 2: Disproportionate RepresentationThe state must monitor the Local Education Agencies (LEAs) located in the state, using quantifiableindicators in each of the following priority areas, and using such qualitative indicators as are needed toadequately measure performance in those areas, [including] disproportionate representation of racial andethnic groups in special education and related services, to the extent the representation is the result ofinappropriate identification. [34 CFR 300.600(d)(3)] [20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(C)]Determination 3: Significant DiscrepancyThe state must examine data, including data disaggregated by race and ethnicity, to determine if significantdiscrepancies are occurring in the rate of long-term suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities: Among LEAs in the State; orCompared to the rates for nondisabled children within those agencies.[34 CFR 300.170(a)] [20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(22)(A)]The State must determine if districts have disproportionality and provide a review of policies, procedures,and practices that contributed to the disproportionality. In an effort to conduct a review of policies,procedures, and practices, the State administers a Self-Assessment Monitoring Protocol to districts andrequires the districts to convene a team of stakeholders to complete the Self-Assessment.To effectivelybegin the review, each district must identify appropriate stakeholders such as regular and special educatorsrepresenting administration, professional learning, parents, curriculum nstruction,and ischool psychology,student support services, and school improvement.Georgia Department of EducationDr. John D. Barge, State School SuperintendentNovember2013iii

The monitoring process is a focused review of a district’s policies, procedures and practices that mostclosely relate to the specific areas of disproportionality. This review has six Focus Areas: I. School-wideApproaches and Prereferral Interventions, II. Child Find Procedures, III. Evaluation Procedures,IV. Eligibility Determination, V. Least Restrictive Environments (LRE) and VI. Discipline Procedures.Checklist to Complete the DisproportionalitySelf-Assessment Monitoring Protocol(For your Convenience - Not Required) Checklist ItemsSchool superintendent or designee selects the team members to conduct the reviewConduct an initial meeting of the review team to discuss timelines for the review and theprocess to collect the required informationIdentify other sources of data and information that must be reviewedSelect appropriate samples to support documentation and evidence of componentsComplete the Self-Assessment Monitoring Protocol and appropriate attachmentsConvene a Self-Assessment team meeting to discuss the findingsAnalyze the data and identify appropriate action steps to address improvement areasUse the Next Steps Planning Template to outline pertinent actions necessary to addressdisproportionalityNote – The district is not required to complete the Next Steps Planning Template but mustaddress this indicator in the Consolidated LEA Improvement Plan (CLIP).Receive technical assistance from the State to determine compliance statusReport to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE)Districts shall maintain documentation of its review for a period of five years. This documentation issubject to additional review by GaDOE and, therefore, should be maintained in an easily retrievable andorganized manner.Georgia Department of EducationDr. John D. Barge, State School SuperintendentNovember 2013iv

Disproportionality Self-Assessment Monitoring ial Education Director:Disproportionality Contact Person:E-mail Address:Team Members Who Participated in the Self-Assessment Review Process:(Use additional sheets, if needed)NameTitleStatement of Verification of AccuracyI verify that the information submitted in this report is accurate based upon the findings from the DisproportionalitySelf-Assessment Monitoring Protocol conducted during the 2012-2013 school year.SuperintendentDate submitted:Page I 1

FY14 Disproportionality DeterminationsDetermination AreaCategoryTypeSignificant DisproportionalityAll DisabilitiesIdentification of SWD*Note – See BelowSpecific Disability CategoriesYes40 – 79% of the dayYes 40% of the dayYesSeparate SettingsYesSignificant DisproportionalityIncidenceYesDiscipline of SWD*Note – See BelowDuration and TypeYesDisproportionate RepresentationAll DisabilitiesState Performance Plan Indicator 9YesSpecific Disability CategoriesState Performance Plan Indicator 10YesAll SWDState Performance Plan Indicator 4aYesSWD by Race and EthnicityState Performance Plan Indicator 4bYesSignificant DisproportionalityPlacement of SWD“In the general education setting”*Note – See BelowOverrepresentation of SWDSignificant DiscrepancyDiscrepant Rate ofSuspension/Expulsion for SWD{Out-of-School; 10 Days}Yes Race/EthnicityDisability CategoryDisability ce/EthnicityDisability CategoryDisability tyRace/EthnicityRace/Ethnicity*Note - Required to use 15% of federal funds to provide Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) for at-risk students during FY14Data used to make the disproportionality determinations may be accessed on the GaDOE Portal by selecting “View Documents” and clicking theword “Special Education”.Page 2

FY14 Disproportionality DeterminationsDetermination AreaCategoryConditionsPractical Examples/Probing QuestionsDo racial/ethnic groups have equal risk of receiving special education and relatedservices when the risk ratio is weighted according to the state’s demographics?All ationSpecific 0 – 79% of thedayPlacement “In thegeneral educationsetting” 40% of the dayWeighted Risk Ratio (WRR) 3.0 for FY13 and 3.0 forFY14Students with Disabilities (SWD) Subgroup enrollment 10(WRR calculated based on district risk and statecomposition)Weighted Risk Ratio (WRR) 3.0 for FY13 and 3.0 for FY14Students with Disabilities (SWD) Subgroup enrollment 10(WRR calculated based on district risk and state composition)Separate iplineDuration and TypeDisproportionateRepresentationAll DisabilitiesOverrepresentationSpecific nt Rate ofSuspension/Expulsionfor SWD {Out-ofSchool; 10 Days}All SWDby Race andEthnicityRelative Risk(RR) for the count of District Level DisciplinaryRemovals 3.0 for FY12 and 3.0 for FY13SWD Subgroup enrollment 10(RR compares district risk among subgroups)Relative Risk Ratio (WRR) for the number of Students with DistrictLevel Disciplinary Removals 3.0 for FY12 and 3.0 for FY13Includes ISS 10days, OSS 10days, ISS 10days, and OSS 10daysSWD Subgroup enrollment 10(RR compares district risk among subgroups)Weighted Risk Ratio (WRR) 3.0 for FY13 and 3.0 forFY14Students with Disabilities (SWD) Subgroup enrollment 10(WRR calculated based on district risk and statecomposition)Relative Risk(RR) for District Level OSS 10 days 2.0 for FY12 and 2.0 for FY13SWD count 5 per subgroup(RR compares district risk to state risk)Page 3Do racial/ethnic groups have equal risk of receiving special education and relatedservices, for a particular disability category, when the risk ratio is weighted according tothe state’s demographics?Sample District had a weighted risk ratio of 3.0 for Hispanic students identified as havingan Intellectual Disability, which means that Hispanic students were three times MORElikely to be identified as having an Intellectual Disability than the comparison group.Do racial/ethnic groups have equal risk of receiving special education and related services in aparticular environment when the risk ratio is weighted according to the state’sdemographics?Sample District had a weighted risk ratio of 2.0 for Black students receiving special educationand related services inside the regular classroom 40% of the school day, which means thatBlack SWD were two times MORE likely to be placed in this setting than the comparisongroup.Are there equal risks for total number of disciplinary removals of SWD, by race andethnicity?Are there equal risks for the duration/type of disciplinary removals of SWD, by race andethnicity?Sample District had a relative risk ratio of 3.0 for Black SWD who experienceddisciplinary removals, which means that Black SWD were three times MORE likely to beremoved than the comparison group.See explanation for Significant Disproportionality (Identification).Do SWD have equal risks for disciplinary removals greater than 10 days when the risk isrelative to the state’s risk?Do SWD, by race and ethnicity, have equal risks for disciplinary removals greater than 10days when the risk is relative to the state’s risk?Sample District had a relative risk of 2.0 for removals of White SWD, which means thatWhite SWD were two times MORE likely to be removed than the comparison group.

FY14 Supporting Document for Disproportionality DeterminationsBased on your Disproportionality Determination area(s) (first column) Complete the designated Focus Areas of this Self-Assessment (second column) Complete the designated Attachments (third column)Important Note: The Self-Assessment is a comprehensive document that will meet the individualized needs of districts identifiedas having disproportionality.Area of DisproportionalitySignificant Disproportionality for IdentificationDisproportionate Representation for OverrepresentationSignificant Disproportionality for PlacementSignificant Disproportionality for DisciplineSignificant Discrepancy for Suspension and ExpulsionAttachment 1:Attachment 2:Attachment 3:Attachment 4:Attachment 5:Attachment 6:Attachment 7:Mandatory Focus Areas of the Self-AssessmentAttachmentsFocus Area I (Prereferral Interventions)Focus Area II (Child Find)Focus Area III (Evaluation and Reevaluation)Focus Area IV (Eligibility Determination)Attachment 1Attachment 2Attachment 3Attachment 5Focus Area I (Prereferral Interventions)Focus Area V (Least Restrictive Environment)Attachment 1Attachment 2Attachment 3Attachment 5Focus Area I (Prereferral Interventions)Focus Area VI (Discipline)Attachment 1Attachment 2Attachment 4Attachment 5Comprehensive Data Analysis SheetData Analysis of Student ReferralsIndividual Student Records Review FormIndividual Discipline Records Review ChecklistStaff Interview Survey QuestionsNext Steps Planning Template (Optional for District Use)Corrective Action Plan Template (Completed if the District is notified of noncompliance findings)Page 4

Focus Area I - School-wide Approaches and Prereferral InterventionsDirections: Review your district’s written policies and procedures for school-wide approaches and prereferral interventions.Determine if these provide equitable opportunities to support interventions that allow students to be successful in the generaleducation environment. Upon completion of your self-assessment in this area, the GaDOE will examine all documentationsupporting your ratings. Complete the following checklist pertaining to SST procedures and gather the evidence to support youranswers.School-wide Approaches and Prereferral InterventionsGeorgia Rule 160-4-2-.32 (Student Support Team)Rate YourComplianceYesNo1. The district has written procedures for implementation of the SST Rule (i.e., use of systematic processes to address learningand/or behavior problems of students, K-12, in a school).2. The district provides high quality, sustained professional learning activities on the written procedures for appropriate districtand school personnel to assist with the implementation of the SST Rule.3. The district provides sustained supervision to monitor the implementation of compliant practices for the SST Rule.4. The district uses the supervision and monitoring data to identify schools and/or personnel that require technical assistance tosupport compliant practices in the area of SST.5. The district provides prereferral interventions that are equitable by type, degree and frequency across all racial/ethnic groups.Sampling of Documentation to Support Compliance RatingsSampling of Evidence to ConsiderLook at:Look for evidence that: Written district policies and procedures for school-wideapproaches and prereferral interventions Building-level procedures implementing board policy or planWritten procedures give direction for adherence to eachcomponent of the Georgia SST rule (consider using the GeorgiaSpecial Education Rules Outline) Comprehensive Data Analysis Sheet (Attachment 1) Building-level procedures implement board policy Data Analysis of Student Referrals (Attachment 2) Available resources for prereferral interventions district-wide andby the building levelResources for prereferral interventions district-wide and buildinglevel are available Building-level research-based tiered interventions have beensystematically implementedPage 5

Sampling of Documentation to Support Compliance Ratings Individual Student Records Review Form (Attachment 3) Additional Interview Questions (Attachment 5)Sampling of Evidence to Consider Prereferral interventions are not made available to all students bytype, degree, and frequency across all racial and ethnic groups There are discrepancies in the types of prereferral supportsavailable to students by buildingProvide a list of the evidence and documentation you will present to the GaDOE to support your compliance rating:Page 6

Focus Area II - Child FindDirections: Review your district’s written policies and procedures for Child Find. Determine if teachers and administrators makeappropriate use of prereferral interventions and if student referrals are handled consistently district-wide. Upon completion of yourself-assessment, the GaDOE will examine all documentation supporting your ratings.Complete the following checklist pertainingto Child Find procedures and gather the evidence to support your answers.Rate YourComplianceChild Find ProceduresGeorgia Rule Number 160-4-7-.03 (Child Find)Yes1. The district has written procedures for implementation of the Child Find Rule.2. The district provides high quality, sustained professional learning activities on the written procedures for appropriate districtand school personnel to assist with the implementation of the Child Find Rule.3. The district provides sustained supervision to monitor the implementation of compliant practices for the Child Find Rule.4. The district uses the supervision and monitoring data to identify schools and/or personnel that require technical assistance tosupport compliant practices in the area of child find.5. The district publishes annual notice of any significant activity that is designed to identify, locate or evaluate children using sometype of media to publicly notify parents.6. The district provides screening and evaluation of all children with suspected disabilities birth through age 21. Please note theChild Find Rule for specific reference such as the referring children birth through the age three to the Babies Can’t Wait earlyintention program.7. The district has a practical method to determine which children are currently receiving special education and related services.8. The district provides student referrals that are accompanied by documentation of scientific, research or evidence basedacademic and/or behavioral interventions that have been implemented as designed for the appropriate period of time to showeffect or lack of effect that demonstrates the child is not making sufficient rate of progress to meet age or State-approved,grade-level standards within a reasonable time frame. *See Rule for exclusionsSampling of Documentation to Support Compliance RatingsLook at: Documentation of district written procedures for Child Find ruleSampling of Evidence to ConsiderLook for evidence that: Page 7Written procedures give direction for adherence to eachNo

Sampling of Documentation to Support Compliance Ratings Documentation of professional learning on RTI proceduresprovided at the local school level. Documentation of the district’s RTI forms and procedures. Documentation to support advertisement of child find activities Documentation of procedures for transition from Babies Can’tWait (BCW) to receiving special education services. Evidence of formal notices to the public supporting identificationof children identified in the Child Find rule. Written referrals Documentation of building principal meetings and agreements towithdraw the referral with documentation of alternative methodsto address the child’s needs Comprehensive Data Analysis Sheet (Attachment 1) Data Analysis of Student Referrals(Attachment 2) Individual Student Records Review Form (Attachment 3) Additional Interview Questions (Attachment 5)Sampling of Evidence to Considercomponent of the Child Find Rule (consider using the GeorgiaSpecial Education Rules Outline). Local school RTI records include reports of interventions, progressmonitoring, and timelines. The appropriate school personnel are knowledgeable of theimportant collaboration with the BCW Agency. Written referrals include information about reasons for the referraland interventions that include universal screeners and researchbased interventions that were tried or reasons why no suchattempts were made Building administrators are involved to ensure that generaleducation support services are considered. General education supports, services and behavioral interventionsare implemented prior to referral regardless of a student’s race orethnicity. The staff is knowledgeable of the different strategies to advertisechild find activities. The staff can describe current child find activities.Provide a list of the evidence and documentation you will present to the GaDOE to support your compliance rating:Page 8

Focus Area III - Evaluation and ReevaluationDirections: Review your district’s written policies and procedures for Evaluation and Reevaluation. Determine if students of all racialand ethnic groups, and particularly students of the identified group, have received appropriate evaluations. The evaluations mustinclude a variety of assessment tools and strategies to gather relevant functional, developmental and academic information aboutthe student that may assist in determining whether the student is a student with a disability. Upon completion of your selfassessment, the GaDOE will examine all documentation supporting your ratings.Complete the following checklist pertaining toEvaluation and Reevaluation procedures and gather the evidence to support your answers.Evaluation and ReevaluationGeorgia Rule Number 160-4-7-.04 (Evaluation)1. The district has written procedures for implementation of the Evaluation and Reevaluation Rule (i.e., use of systematicprocesses to address learning and/or behavior problems of students, K-12, in a school).2. The district provides high quality, sustained professional learning activities on the written procedures for appropriate districtand school personnel to assist with the implementation of the Evaluation and Reevaluation Rule.3. The district provides sustained supervision to monitor the implementation of compliant practices for the Evaluation andReevaluation Rule.4. The district uses the supervision and monitoring data to identify schools and/or personnel that require technical assistance tosupport compliant practices in the area of evaluation and reevaluation.5. The district provides a reevaluation of each child with a disability at least once every 3 years, unless the parent and the districtagree that a reevaluation is unnecessary.6. The district uses a variety of evaluation tools and strategies to gather relevant academic, functional and developmentalinformation about the child, including information provided by the parents that may assist in determining: (i) Whether the childis a child with a disability and (ii) The content of the child's individualized education program including information related toenabling the child to be involved in and progress in the general curriculum (or for a preschool child to participate in appropriateactivities).7. The district uses more than one procedure to determine whether a child has a disability and the appropriate educationalprogram for the child.8. The district uses technically sound instruments to assess the relative contribution of cognitive and behavioral factors, inaddition to physical or developmental factors.Page 9Rate YourComplianceYesNo

Rate YourComplianceEvaluation and ReevaluationGeorgia Rule Number 160-4-7-.04 (Evaluation)YesNo9. The district selects assessments and other evaluation materials based on the following criteria:i) Are selected and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial or cultural basis;ii) Are provided and administered in the child's native language or other mode of communication and in the form most likelyto yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally, unlessit is clearly not feasible to so provide or administer;iii) Are used for the purposes for which the evaluations or measures are valid and reliable;iv) Are administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel; andv) Are administered in accordance with any instructions provided by the producer of the assessments.10. The district assesses children in all areas related to the suspected disability, including, if appropriate, health, vision, hearing,social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communicative status, and motor abilities.Sampling of Documentation to Support Compliance RatingsSampling of Evidence to ConsiderLook at:Look for evidence that: Eligibility Reports/Student Records Individualized Education Program (IEP) documentation(reevaluation)Written procedures give direction for adherence to eachcomponent of the Evaluation and Reevaluation rule (consider usingthe Georgia Special Education Rules Outline). Policies and procedures to support this Rule Students receive a comprehensive evaluation. Comprehensive Data Analysis Sheet (Attachment 1) Data Analysis of Student Referrals(Attachment 2) The comprehensive evaluation provides information necessary todetermine the disability and need for special education servicesand supports.Individual Student Records Review Form (Attachment 3) Additional Staff Interview Questions (Attachment 5)Assessments and other evaluation materials are in the student’snative language or other mode of communication. Assessments and other evaluation materials are administered forpurposes for which the assessments or measures are valid andreliable. Multiple measures are used to determine if a student is a studentwith a disability.Page 10

Provide a list of the evidence and documentation you will present to the GaDOE to support your compliance rating:Page 11

Focus Area IV - Eligibility DeterminationDirections: Review your district’s written policies and procedures for Eligibility Determination. Determine to what extent students ofthe identified racial and ethnic groups are provided appropriate instruction and resources to promote learning prior to referral andthat the special education recommendations are based on the students’ evaluations. Upon completion of your self-assessment, theGaDOE will examine all documentation supporting your ratings.Complete the following checklist pertaining to Child Findprocedures and gather the evidence to support your answers.Eligibility DeterminationGeorgia Rule Number 160-4-7-.05 (Eligibility)1. The district has written procedures for implementation of the Eligibility Determination Rule (i.e., use of systematic processesto address learning and/or behavior problems of students, K-12, in a school).2. The district provides high quality, sustained professional learning activities on the written procedures for appropriate districtand school personnel to assist with the implementation of the Eligibility Determination Rule.3. The district provides sustained supervision to monitor the implementation of compliant practices for the EligibilityDetermination Rule.4. The district uses the supervision and monitoring data to identify schools and/or personnel that require technical assistance tosupport compliant practices in the area of eligibility.5. The district ensures Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) are developed for children with a determination made of havinga disability that has: (a) an adverse effect on educational performance (academic, functional and/or developmental) and (b)requires special education and related services.6. The district ensures that an eligibility report, which documents the area of disability, is completed and placed in each child’sspecial education folder. The eligibility report must provide statements for each component of the eligibility and becomprehensive enough to serve as the evaluation report when necessary.7. The district ensures upon completion of the administration of assessments and other measures that the Eligibility Team (agroup of qualified professionals and the parents of the child) determine whether the child is a child with a disability and theeducational needs of the child.8. The district ensures appropriate consideration of the exclusionary factor for reading (a child is not to be determined to be achild with a disability if the primary factor for that determination is a lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including theessential components of reading instruction as defined in section 1208(3) of ESEA).Page 12Rate YourComplianceYesNo

Rate YourComplianceEligibility DeterminationGeorgia Rule Number 160-4-7-.05 (Eligibility)YesNo9. The district ensures appropriate consideration of the exclusionary factor for math (a child must not be determined to be achild with a disability if the primary factor for that determination is a lack of appropriate instruction in math).10. The district ensures appropriate consideration of the exclusionary factor for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) (a child must notbe determined to be a child with a disability if the primary factor for that determination is a lack of LEP).11. The district ensures: (1) evaluation data draws upon information from a variety of sources, including aptitude andachievement tests, parent input, and teacher recommendations as well as the information about the child’s physicalcondition, social or cultural background, and adaptive behavior and (2) that information obtained from all of these sources isdocumented and carefully considered.Sampling of Documentation to Support Compliance RatingsSampling of Evidence to ConsiderLook at:Look for evidence that: Written procedures give direction for adherence to eachcomponent of the Eligibility Determination rule (consider using theGeorgia Special Education Rules Outline). What attempts have been made to provide remedial instruction orother general education support alternatives to special education?(name specific research-based activities/programs/strategies used)Eligibility decisions are based on evaluation data demonstratingthat students require special educa

School; 10 Days} All SWD Relative Risk(RR) for District Level OSS 10 days 2.0 for FY12 and 2.0 for FY13 SWD count 5 per subgroup (RR compares district risk to state risk) Do SWD have equal risks for disciplinary removals

Related Documents:

EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol OSPF Open Shortest Path First Protocol IE-IRGP Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol VRRP Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol PIM-DM Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode PIM-SM Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode IGRP Interior Gateway Routing Protocol RIPng for IPv6 IPv6 Routing Information Protocol PGM

2.2 Monitoring surveys 7 3 Monitoring habitat 8 3.1 Food supply - direct measurement 9 3.2 Food supply - indirect measurements 9 4 Monitoring protocol summary 10 4.1 Monitoring otters 10 4.2 Monitoring habitat 11 SECTION 2:REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES AND PROTOCOL RATIONALE 13 1 Introduction 13 1.1 Monitoring otter populations 13

overview of the literature on this topic, but not every finding or practice described may be applicable to each community or agency. Each community and agency should review its own data, practices, policies, and other factors to determine the best path to address any disproportionality and disparities.

Americans (e.g., Ward, 2010). Yet the disproportionality of African Americans in special education has been nearly two and a half times that of non-African Americans (Oswald, Coutinho, Best & Singh, 1999). The problem of disproportionality has been esp

Jan 01, 2016 · Report to the Legislature . Racial Disproportionality and Disparity in . Washington State . RCW 74.13.096(

spreadsheet application is state agency staff who analyze disproportionality data. While this user’s guide and the spreadsheet application are intended to be as user-friendly as possible, they do assume a basic knowledge of Excel. In addition, some of the methodologies and calculations included in

Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Training Curriculum). Disproportionality is a complex problem - a. symptom, not a cause. 1. 2 READ SLIDE ALOUD. 3 READ NOTES ALOUD. Disproportionality in the context of

SNMP V1/V2/V3 Simple Network Management Protocol SNTP Simple Network Time Protocol RFC RFC 768 UDP (User Datagran Protocol) RFC 783 TFTP (Trivial File Transfer Protocol) RFC 791 IP (Internet Protocol) RFC 792 ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) RFC 793 TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) R