Automatic Flight Control - Soaneemrana

2y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
4.88 MB
332 Pages
Last View : 27d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Averie Goad
Transcription

Automatic Flight Control

Automatic Flight ControlFourth EditionE. H. J. Pallett IEng, AMRAesS. Coyle MSETPBlackwellScience

r E. H.J. Pallett & S. Coyle 1993Blackwell Science Ltd, a Blackwell Publishing companyEditorial offices:Blackwell Science Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UKTel: 44 (0) 1865 776868Blackwell Publishing Inc., 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USATel: 1 781 388 8250Blackwell Science Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, AustraliaTel: 61 (0) 3 8359 1011The right of the Author to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted inaccordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrievalsystem, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.First published by Granada Publishing Ltd 1979Second edition 1983Third edition published by BSP Professional Books 1987Reprinted 1989, 1990Fourth edition published by Blackwell Science 1993Reprinted 1995, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005Second Indian Reprint 2007Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataPallett, E.HJ.Automatic flight controljE.HJ. Pallett-4th ed.p. cm.Includes index.ISBN 978-1-4051-3541-21. Flight control. 2. Automatic pilot(Airplanes) I. Title.TL589.4.P34 199398-25282CIP629.135'2-dc20ISBN 978-1-4051-3541-2A catalogue record for this title is available from the British LibrarySet by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd, Hong KongPrinted and bound in India by Replika Press Pvt. Ltd.The publisher's policy is to use permanent paper from mills that operate a sustainableforestry policy, and which has been manufactured from pulp processed using acid-free andelementary chlorine-free practices. Furthermore, the publisher ensures that the text paperand cover board used have met acceptable environmental accreditation standards.For further information on Blackwell Publishing, visit our website:www.blackwellpublishing.comLicensed for sale in India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka only.Sale and purchase of this edition outside these territories is unauthorizedby the publishers.

Preface to First EditionAt the present time there is hardly an aircraft in either civil or militaryoperation without some form of automatic flight control system comprisingpart of its standard operational equipment. The systems available are asdiverse as the aircraft themselves, varying from a simple roll stabiliseror 'wing-leveller' in a single-engined private aircraft, to the sophisticatedflight-guidance systems capable of automatically controlling the flight pathsoflarge transport aircraft from take-off to touchdown and roll-out. It is thena little difficult perhaps to realise that the development of such systems hasarisen from foundations laid years before man himself took to the air tobecome the controller of his own 'flight path destiny'.The early inventors of 'heavier-than-air flying machines' were, of course,faced with many problems, the most prominent of which was the oneassociated with the attainment of stabilised flight. Although there wasan awareness that stability should be inherent in the basic design of amachine, little was known of the separation of stability into dynamic andstatic elements in relation to the various degrees of freedom possessed bya machine. As a result, and as recorded history indicates, efforts weredirected more towards keeping a machine straight and level and free fromthe effects of external disturbances, and to derive the requisite stability byapplying some form of artificial stabilising device.It is of interest to note that possibly the first machine to use such a devicewas an unmanned glider designed by the Frenchman Charles Renardin 1873. The device consisted of a transverse pendulum coupled to two'steering wings', the idea being that if the machine turned from its intendedflight path, the pendulum would raise one wing and lower the other, andthereby straighten the machine's path. The first flight test indicated thatsuch a device could work, but that lateral instability would have to bemuch less than that exhibited by Renard's machine to be really successful!Apart from the pendulum, the stabilising properties of a gyroscope werealso considered, and a noteworthy 'first' in this connection was the stabiliserpatented in 1891 by Sir Hiram Maxim and installed in his steam-poweredmachine. The design concept was somewhat ahead of its time in that it alsocomprised a servo control loop and other features which are basic to today'sVII

Automatic Flight Controlautomatic flight control systems. Maxim's flying machine unfortunately, .came to an untimely end before the stabiliser could be tested under 'live'conditions.When later pioneers took up the challenge of designing machines inwhich they themselves ventured to fly, the possibility of manoeuvring theirmachines away from straight and level flight was realised. However, thiswas to present another problem; namely, how to cater for the changes instability which would result when control for initiating a manoeuvre wasapplied. Thus, 'controllability' was to become an important feature of flyingmachine design, and one which the Wright brothers were to incorporatein the machine which gained for them the distinction of making thathistoric flight in 1903. The Wrights' approach to aerodynamic and in-flightproblems was more advanced than that of their predecessors, and althoughthe machines built and flown by them were not completely stable, theincorporation of the controllability feature permitted a number of successfulflights to be made without artificial stabilisation.The introduction of control systems by the Wright brothers and subsequent pioneers in their aeroplanes (as they were becoming known) was toestablish an additional role for stabilisation devices to play because, if adevice could be coupled to the controls, then it alone could correct anydeparture from a stabilised condition. This was not to go unchallenged ofcourse, and the first practical demonstration of a coupled gyroscopic twoaxis control device was given by Lawrence Sperry during his historic flightin Paris in 1914. Thus, it can be said that the foundation for automaticallycontrolled flight was laid in the early years of this century. By the midtwenties and in the 'thirties', the development of systems in the UnitedStates, the United Kingdom and Europe, became a separate field ofengineering technology, and a number of 'automatic pilots' and 'gyropilots'demonstrated their capabilities in commercial and military aircraft operations, and in several historic long-distance record flights. As the technologyhas continued to develop, system designs have been influenced not onlyby the advances made in aerodynamics and aircraft controllability characteristics, but also by the advances taking place in other technological fields.For example, the changeover from pneumatic operation of gyroscopes toelectrical operation; the processing of control signals by electron tubes andmagnetic amplifiers; the introduction of the semiconductor; and, perhapsthe greatest influence of all at this moment in time, .the vast potential ofdigital processing technology.The diversity of present-day automatic flight control systems arises principally because they need tailoring to suit the aerodynamic and flighthandling characteristics of individ ual types of aircraft. It is possible tocompromise, and by virtue of this, many of the systems installed in aircraftdesigned for operation in the general aviation sector are, in fact, highlyversatile in their applications; however, there are limitations particularlywhere the more complex types of transport aircraft are concerned. Thus,Vlll

Preface to First Editionany attempts at describing the range of systems and their operatingfundamentals would be a mammoth task involving the writing of severalvolumes. However, any one automatic flight control system may .be considered as being composed of four principal elements, which althoughdiffering in design and construction, perform functions common to allother control systems. The element functions concerned are progressively:attitude sensing, error signal sensing, signal processing, and conversion ofprocessed signals into powered control, and they set a convenient patternfor a general study of control fundamentals. The material for this book has,therefore, been structured accordingly, and it is hoped that the selectedexamples of devices performing such functions, will usefully illustrate howrelevant principles are applied.A basic understanding of the priciples of flight and aircraft stability, andof servomechanisms, is a pre-requisite to a study of the main subject andthey are therefore covered in the opening chapters. With the developmentof flight director systems and of the concept of integrating basic attitudeand navigational data, it became logical to share data and servomechanismlinks such that a director system could provide guidance commands to anautomatic flight control system. Thus, manufacturers develop and makeavailable a wide range of complementary systems, the basic principles ofwhich have also been included in this book. Chapter IO deals with whatmay be termed the ultimate in automatic flight control evolution, namelyautomatic landing and autothrottle systems.In preparing the material on systems, I have been greatly assisted bydata and illustrations supplied by manufacturers, and would in particular,like to express grateful thanks to Collins Radio Company of England Ltd,Smith's Industries, Marconi Avionics Ltd, and Sperry Rand Ltd, for theirpermission to use certain of the data, and to have photographs reproduced.My thanks are also extended to friends and colleagues for useful suggestions, comments and assistance in proof reading, and finally to thepublisher's editoral staff for their patience.CopthorneSussexE.P.IX

Preface to the Fourth EditionThe continuing demand for this book has been most encouraging, andit has therefore, been particularly gratifying to meet the publisher's requirement for the production of this, the fourth edition.Since the book was first published in 1979, considerable technologicaladvancement of systems designed for the automatic control of aircraft has,inevitably, taken place. As is generally the case however, such advancementhas been in the methods by which established fundamental principles areapplied. It is hoped that the coverage of these principles in previouseditions has been of help to those readers who, having encountered practicalexamples of 'new applications technology' in the course of their particularspecialisation in aviation, have had to gain more detailed knowledge of suchapplications.In preparing the material for this edition, it was considered appropriateto retain the same. sequence of chapters, in accordance with the functions ofthe principal elements that comprise any one type of control system.New information has been added on principles of flightautomatic control of helicoptersautothrottle controldigital computer-based systems.Information on the fundamentals of fly-by-wire control systems has alsobeen expanded and now forms the subject of a new chapter.The authors would like to thank the following manufacturers for supplingnew illustrations for this edition: SFIM, Honeywell, Airbus Industrie, andWestland Helicopters.Copthorne, SussexRoade, NorthamptonXE.P.s.c.

ContentspagePreface to First EditionPreface to Fourth EditionIvuxPrinciples of FlightA. Fixed-wing aircraftB. Helicopters2 Servomechanisms and Automatic Control FundamentalsI55723Sensing of Attitude Changes1074Command Signal Detection1295 Command Signal Processing6Outer Loop Control1481677 Conversion ofCom111and Signals to Powered Control2048Automatic Control of Helicopters2369Flight Director Systems25610Automatic Landing and Autothrottle Systems277llFly-by-wire (FBW) Control Systems292Appendix I Fixed-wing Aircraft/AFCS Combinations302Appendix 2 Helicopter/AFCS Combinations305Appendix 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations Associated with AFCS,307Equipment and Controlling Signal FunctionsAppendix 4 Logic Circuits3l 3Appendix 5 Solutions to Multi-choice Questions316Index317V

1Principles of FlightIn order to understand the operating fundamentals of any automaticflight control system (AFCS) and its application to an aircraft, it is firstnecessary to have some understanding of how an aircraft flies, its stabilitycharacteristics, and of the conventional means by which .it is controlled.There are two classes of aircraft with which we are concerned, namelyfixed-wing and rotary wing or helicopter class, and the contents of thischapter are therefore set out under these appropriate headings.A. FIXED-WING AIRCRAFTLiftIt is a well-known fact from common experience that all material objectsare attracted to the earth by a force which is in proportion to the mass ofthe object; such a force is called gravity. In order for an object to rise fromthe earth's surface, and to maintain itself in a continual ascent or at aconstant height above the surface, the attraction which gravity has for theobject must be opposed by the development of a force called lift. A varietyof methods can of course be adopted, the choice being dependent on theobject to be lifted. The method with which we are concerned, however, isthe one applied to the wings of an aircraft. In this method, wings aredesigned so that they conform to specific plan forms, and aerofoil-shapedcross-sections, chosen on the basis of size, weight and performance requirements of the particular aircraft. The geometry of some typical wingplan forms, aerofoil cross-sections, and associated terminology are shown infig. 1.1.In order to generate the required lifting force there must be relativemovement between the wing and the surrounding air. Theoretically, itmakes no difference whether air flows over a stationary wing or whether thewing is moved through the air; in practice, however, the latter movementtakes place as a result of the propulsive thrust from a propeller or turbineengine exhaust gases.

Automatic Flight ControlC---JTaperTipRectangularSweptbackII Slender Delta Low-speed,,I ''')\''\\\' 'v'I High speedVariable geometryMean camber lineLEChord line andmean camber lineTEChord lineTELE radiusUnsymmetricalFig. 1.1 Wing planforms and aerofoil terminology.2Symmetrical

Principles of FlightIncreasedlocal velocity---Angle ofattack.:a --.-::::.jNet lifting force- ---Pressure distributionFig. 1.2 Generation of lift.Referring to fig. 1.2 it will be noted that when the air strikes the leadingedge of the wing, it divides into a flow over the upper and lower camberedsurfaces of its aerofoil section. The mass of continuity of flow is constant,but as a result of differences between the amount of upper and lowersurface camber, and also because the wing is at an angle of attack, i.e. at anangle relative to the airflow, the velocity of the airflow over the uppersurface will be greater than that of the air flowing along the lower surface.Since the pressure of fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where thevelocity of the fluid increases, then for an aircraft wing at small angles ofattack the pressures acting on both surfaces of the wing will decrease.However, the decrease is greater on the more highly cambered uppersurface, and it is the resulting pressure difference across the wing aerofoilsection which generates the net lifting force. The greatest pressures occur atthe stagnation point, at points around the leading edge, and at the trailingedge.The measurement of the pressures acting on the surfaces are in absolutevalues, and they are represented by vectors drawn perpendicular to thesurfaces. The length of a vector is proportional to the difference betweenabsolute pressure at a point and free stream static pressure. It is usual toconvert this to a non-directional quantity called the pressure coefficient3

Automatic Flight Controlby comparing it with free stream dynamic pressure. The convention forplotting these coefficients is (i) measured pressure higher than ambientgives a positive coefficient, and the vector is plotted towards the surface; (ii)measured pressure lower than ambient, the coefficient is negative, and thevector is plotted away from the surface.From the foregoing it is apparent that variations in angle of attack are animportant factor in controlling the magnitude of the lift generated by awing. For example, when angle of attack is increased the velocity of airflowover the upper surface increases at a faster rate than that over the lowersurface, thereby changing the pressure distribution such that the net liftingforce is further increased. At some critical angle of attack, called the stallingangle, the airflow separates from the upper surface and becomes turbulent,with the result that the lifting force is drastically reduced. In practice, thewings of each type of aircraft are fixed at an optimum angle of the chordline relative to a longitudinal datum (generally called the 'rigging angle ofincidence') and the aircraft then flown within a small working range ofangles of attack so that in combination the highest lift/drag ratio andeconomic performance may be obtained.Other important factors which control pressure distribution and lift arethe velocity of the free air flow, its viscosity and its density, the shape andthickness of the aerofoil section adopted for a wing, the wing plan form andits area, and condition of wing surfaces.Delta wingThe lift coefficient (CL) of a delta wing continues to increase up to verysteep angles of attack because the system of leading edge vortices strengthens as angle of attack increases. The form of the vortex system of a wingwith a large angle of sweep is shown in fig. l .3.When the wing is at zero angle of attack, the airflow reJilains attached toboth surfaces of the wing and no lift is generated. As soon as the angle ofattack departs from zero, the flow separates along the entire length of theleading edges in the form of two free vortex layers joined to the leadingedges and rolled up in the manner of two conically-shaped spiralling coilsabove the upper surface of the wing. The coils, or leading edge vortices,induce a suction on the upper surface which remains constant along thechord except in the neighbourhood of the trailing edge. The size of thevortices increases with angle of attack and they cover a progressivelygreater proportion of the wing surface. When the angle of sweep is sufficient,these vortices remain in a broadly similar form through a wide range ofangles of attack and the flow is characteristically steady throughout therange appropriate to the required flight conditions. Secondary vortices flowbetween the leading edges and the cores of the main vortices, but because4

Principles of FlightLeadingEdgeSecondaryVorticesFig. 1.3 Leading edge vortices.these also develop progressively they do not interfere with the stability ofthe main flow.As the vortices increase with angle of attack, the suction force generatedon the upper surface of the wing increases and thereby contributes to thetotal lift produced.The slender delta plan form shown in fig. I. I is of the type adopted forthe 'Concorde'. The curved shape of the wing is such that maximumsweepback is obtained at the inboard sections of the wing without destroying the best effects of the vortex system.Centre of pressureIn connection with the pressure variations occurring across the surfaces of awing, it is usual to consider the total lift force as acting from one pointalong the chord line; this point is known as the centre of pressure (CP). Aswill be noted from fig. 1.4 a, the total lift force is resolved into two principalcomponents: (i) the lift component acting at right angles to the direction ofthe free airflow, and (ii) a total drag component acting in the direction ofthe free airflow. The ratio of lift to drag is a measure of the efficiency of anyaerofoil section adopted for an aircraft wing.The location of the CP is a function of camber and the factor known asthe lift coefficient, and it varies with the angle of attack. As the angle of5

Automatic Flight ControlLiftTotal forceCentre of pressureaLiftCentre of pressureLiftAerodynamic centrebFig. 1.4 Centre of pressure and aerodynamic centre.attack increases, there is a change in the distribution of pressure above andbelow the wing such that the magnitude of lift force increases and the CPmoves forward. At a certain angle of attack, known as the stalling angle,there is a sudden decrease in the magnitude of the lift force and the CPmoves rearward.Aerodynamic centreMovement of the CP with changes in angle of attack also causes thepitching moment of a wing to vary, to an extent which depends on theposition of the moment reference point 'A'. The pitching moment is equalto the product of the total lift force and the distance from the point 'A' tothe CP (fig. 1.4 b). It is, however, possible to locate a reference point aboutwhich the pitching moment is constant (Cm) regardless of the angle ofattack. Such a point is known as the aerodynamic centre, and for flight at6

Principles of Flightsubsonic speeds, it is usually located at or near 25% of the chord. In themathematical treatment of stability and control of aircraft, allowance ismade for the constant pitching moment and it is assumed therefore that thetotal lift force acts from the aerodynamic centre rather than the CP.DragThe movement of a body through a fluid, whether it is a liquid or air,always produces a force that tends to oppose the movement; such a force isknown as drag. Thus the wings of an aircraft, and all its other structuralparts exposed to the airflow, experience components of a total drag whichmust be reduced to a minimum. The drag components arise in severaldifferent ways and they can be considered as constituting two principaltypes of drag, i.e. profile, and induced or vortex; these are summarised intabular form in fig. 1.5.TOTAL DRAGPROFILEvortexformskin frictioninterferencesizeII'wetted' areaIIjunctions betweenstructural componentsfineness ratiosurface conditionIIIIIspeedspeedseparation pointviscosityIboundary layerflowFig. 1.5 Total drag of an aircraft.7

Automatic Flight ControlProjil,e dragProfile drag is composed of the drag components produced by the surface orskin friction created when a body is exposed to airflow, and also by theform or shape of the body. A controlling factor in determining, amongother things, the nature of these components, is the very thin layer of airextending from the surface of the body, and referred to as the boundary layer.The whole surface area of an aircraft has a boundary layer and thereforehas surface friction drag.If the streamlines of an airflow over the wing of an aircraft are consideredas the boundary lines between layers of air, then because air has viscosity,variations in the velocity of each layer will occur as a result of viscousadhesion. Such variations are governed by the distance from the wings'surface, and also by the condition of the surface, i.e. whether it is rough orsmooth. The layer adjacent to the surface will adhere to it and so itsvelocity will approximate to that of the wing. The viscous adhesion betweenVelocity decreasingtC::.iii!rnBoundarylayerAircraft skin TransitionpointSeparationpointII Turbulent wakeI!--Laminar-I-- TurbulentflowflowbFig. 1.6 Boundary layer.8--j

Principles of Flightthis layer and the one above it will cause the second layer to flow in thedirection of wing movement, but at a slightly lower velocity. Similarly, thevelocity of the adjacent layers will be lowered until a point is reached wherethe movement of the wing causes no movement whatsoever of layers of airat some distance 'd' from the wing surface (see fig. 1.6 a). Thus, boundarylayer may be more closely defined as the layer of air extending from asurface to the point where no viscous drag forces are discernible.Boundary layer airflow may be either laminar, i.e. streamline, or turbulent as shown in fig. 1.6 b. Usually the airflow starts by being laminarover the forward part of the surface, and then at some point, called thetransition point, the layer tends to break away from the surface and becomesturbulent. The turbulent air mixes with the air above the boundary layercausing a thickening and spreading out of the layer and, as this increasesthe distance at which viscous drag forces can act, surface friction drag willaccordingly increase. Eventually, at a point close to the trailing edge of thewing, the boundary layer separates from the surface resulting in a wake ofturbulent air. The separation depends on the rate at which the pressurechanges around the body, the rate of pressure change in turn depending-onthe shape of the body.The position of the transition point in an airflow of a given density an !viscosity depends on the velocity of the airflow and the thickness of thebody in the airflow. When applied to a wing of a given thickness, anincrease of velocity causes the transition point to move towards the leadingedge with the result that more of the wing surface is covered by a turbulentboundary layer and so surface friction drag is further increased. However, aturbulent layer has more kinetic energy than a laminar layer and, since thishas the effect of delaying boundary layer separation, the maximum value oflift coefficient is increased.Form dragThis type of drag, as the name suggests, is dependent on the shape of thebody exposed to the airflow and as noted earlier, the body shape governsthe boundary layer separation and the rate at which the pressure aroundthe body changes. For this reason, therefore, form drag is also referred to asboundary layer normal pressure drag. In order to appreciate the differencebetween surface friction drag and form drag, let us consider for a momentthat the body exposed to the airflow is in the form of a very thin plate.When the plate is at zero angle of attack with respect to the airflow thedirection of the airflow will not be materially changed and neither will thevelocity or pressure. Thus the boundary layer in this case is purely laminarand the drag results solely from surface friction. When the plate is set at anangle of attack it will cause a change in airflow direction, velocity andpressure, so that the boundary layer now becomes turbulent and begins toseparate from the upper surface of the plate. If the angle of attack is further9

Automatic Flight Controlincreased such that the total surface area of the plate is presented to theairflow then there is a complete breakdown of the boundary layer and thedrag is wholly form drag.Interference dragInterference drag is a result of disturbances to the airflow over an aircraftby the many junctions between major parts of its structure, e.g. betweenwings and fuselage, engine nacelles and wings. They can all cause changesin the pressure distribution and early separation of the boundary layer.Induced dragWhen a wing is producing lift, the airflow over both the upper and lowersurfaces join at the trailing edge, and leave it in the form of a vortex motionthe direction of which imparts a downward velocity component to the air.This downwash, as it is called, has the effect of inclining the lift forcerearwards so that it will have a component acting in the direction of thedrag force. This additional drag component is called the induced or vortexdrag, and is affected by such main factors as plan form and aspect ratio of awing, lift and weight, and speed of the aircraft.One method of reducing vortex drag is to fit what are termed 'winglets'such that they are virtually wing-tip extensions turned through an anglecompatible with the aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft concerned.An example of the method as applied to a current type of swept-wingaircraft is shown in fig. l. 7.Aircraft stabilityStability is the property of a system whereby the latter returns to a state ofequilibrium after it has been displaced from a state of rest or a state ofFig. 1. 7 Gulfstream III Corporate Jet (reproduced by courtesy of Grumman AerospaceCorporation).10

Principles of FlightJla.U)i5--- eutralDYNAMICFig. 1.8 Stability.uniform motion. In applying this definition to an aircraft, it can be statedtherefore, that following a displacement from an original steady flight path,an aircraft has stability if it returns to that path without movements of itsflight control surfaces having to be applied.In practice however, there are two types of stability to consider: staticstability and dynamic stability (see fig. 1.8). Static stability refers to theimmediate reaction of the aircraft and its tendency to return to equilibriumafter displacement, while dynamic stability refers to the subsequent longterm reaction which is of an oscillatory nature about a neutral or equilibrium position. It is usual to classify both types of stability according tothe nature of an aircraft's response to displacements from its original steadyflight path: thus, stability is positive when, subsequent to the displacement,the forces and moments acting on the aircraft return it to its original steadyflight path; neutral if the forces and moments cause the aircraft to take up a11

Automatic Flight ControlNormal axisII;?" '·"'//Longi udinalaxis/Yawing plane-1·/"---Lateral axisRolling planeFig. 1.9 Aircraft axes and displacement planes.new flight path of constant relationship to the original; and negative if theaircraft is caused to diverge from the original steady flight path (an unstablecondition). Static stability is a prerequisite for dynamic stability, althoughthe converse is not true; it is possiblr: to have a system which is staticallystable, but dynam

automatic flight control system. Thus, manufacturers develop and make available a wide range of complementary systems, the basic principles of which have also been included in this book. Chapter IO deals with what may be termed the ultimate in automatic flight control evolution, namely automatic landing and autothrottle systems.

Related Documents:

AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM Flight Control and Guidance REV3,May03/05 Flight Crew Operating Manual CSP C--013--067 Course Pointer Control and Indication 1015 Figure 03---20---4 10 10 Primary Flight Display Pilot’s and Copilot’s Instrument Panels Flight Control Panel Center

Flight Operation Quality Assurance (FOQA) programs are today customary among major . EASA European Aviation Safety Agency F/D Flight Director . FAF Final Approach and Fix point FCOM Flight Crew Operating Manual FCTM Flight Crew Training Manual FDAP Flight Data Analysis Program FDM Flight Data Monitoring FLCH Flight Level Change FMC Flight .

Using ASA’s Flight Planner A flight log is an important part in the preparation for a safe flight. The flight log is needed during flight to check your groundspeed and monitor flight progress to ensure you are staying on course. The Flight Planner has two sections; the Preflight side is used for pre-

‘757 Captain’ Sim FLIGHT MANUAL Part III – Normal Procedures DO NOT USE FOR FLIGHT AMPLIFIED PROCEDURES EXTERIOR INSPECTION Prior to each flight, a flight crew member or the maintenance crew must verify the airplane is acceptable for flight. Check: - Flight control surfaces unobstructed and all surfaces clear of ice, snow, or frost.

means before the flight becomes official. A flight of less than 60 seconds duration will be considered a delayed flight; one delayed flight shall be allowed for each of the five official flights. After a delayed flight, the next launch shall result in an official flight being recorde

offically licensed cessna products from saitek pro flight avilable at: www.saitek.com pro flight cessna rudder pedals flight pedals with toe brakes pro flight cessna yoke system flight yoke and 3 lever quadrant modual pro flight cessna trim wheel

GLOSSARY ACMS: Aircraft Condition Monitoring System AFDAU: Auxiliary Flight Data Acquisition Unit APM: Aircraft Performance Monitoring ASR: Aviation Safety Report CRM: Crew Resource Management CVR: Cockpit Voice Recorder DFDR: Digital Flight Data Recorder FDA: Flight Data Analysis FDAU: Flight Data Acquisition Unit FDEP: Flight Data Entry Panel FDM: Flight Data Monitoring

dealing with financial and monetary transactions such as deposits, loans, investments or currency exchanges. NB. Do not include trust companies in this section, although it can be considered a financial institution. All of the clients/customers categorized in A02-A12 are to total all active clients disclosed in A01a above. Introduction