AGRICULTURALCOMMERCILIZATIONIN ETHIOPIA:A Review Of Warehouse ReceiptsIn The Maize, Wheat, SorghumAnd Tef Value ChainsAugust 2017This publication was producedat the request of the AgriculturalTransformation Agency (ATA). It wasprepared independently by TuftsUniversity. The author of the report isSally Pauw.Agricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chains
Agricultural Commercializationin Ethiopia: A Review of WarehouseReceipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghumand Tef Value ChainsAugust 2017USAID Contract number: AID-663-C-14-00002Agriculture Knowledge, Learning, Documentation andPolicy (AKLDP) ProjectImplemented by:Feinstein International CenterFriedman School of Nutrition Science and PolicyTufts University Africa Regional OfficePO Box 1078Addis AbabaEthiopiaTel: 251 (0)11 orgSuggested citationPauw, S. (2017). Agricultural Commercialization inEthiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize,Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chains. USAID/EthiopiaAgriculture Knowledge, Learning, Documentation andPolicy Project, Addis AbabaDisclaimerThe views expressed in this report do not necessarilyreflect the views of the United States Agency forInternational Development or the United StatesGovernment.AcknowledgmentsThanks in particular to Adrian Cullis, former AKLDP Chiefof Party, for initiating this study. Advice, feedback andtechnical assistance from Mirafe Marcos, Fekadu Tilahun,Gebre Egziabner Abay, Zewdu Abera and Karl Pauw aregreatly acknowledged.Agricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chains
TABLE OFCONTENTSLIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXESiiiACRONYMSivEXECUTIVE SUMMARYv1. INTRODUCTION12. ETHIOPIA’S WAREHOUSE RECEIPT SYSTEM AND THE SUPPORTINGENVIRONMENT32.1 Establishment of the WRS, ECX, and EACWSE32.2 WRS utilization and performance42.3 The AGP-AMDe roadmap: recommendations pertaining tothe WRS52.4 Agricultural Commercialization Clusters and the WRS9102.5 Community WRS: Successes and challenges2.6 Information Communication Technology (ICT)requirements112.7 Financial institutions and WRF122.8 Private sector14163. PRIORITY COMMODITY MARKET ANALYSIS3.1 Technical assessment of storability163.2 Price trends and seasonality164. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS205. REFERENCES246. APPENDIX27Agricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chainsii
LIST OF TABLES,FIGURES AND BOXES7Table 1. Assessed storage capacity in Ethiopia, by storage ownerTable 2. Markets selected for price analysis31Table 3. Correlation coefficients between market pairs, 2011–2017325Figure 1. Warehouse receipt finance disbursements (ETB): 2011-2012Figure 2. ACC integration with IAIPs and the LMP10Figure 3. Price index of national maize and tef prices, 2012–201618Figure 4. Price index of national wheat and barley prices, 2012–201619Figure 5. Schematic representation of an integrated WRS in Ethiopia22Figure 6. ACCs in Oromia27Figure 7. ACCs in Amhara28Figure 8. ACCs in Tigray29Figure 9. ACCs in SNNP308Box 1. The Agricultural Storage and Investment Facility in MalawiBox 2. Forward contracts13Box 3. Malting Factory Example15Agricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chainsiii
ACRONYMSACCAgricultural Commercialization ClustersACEAgricultural Commodity Exchange for AfricaAGP-AMDeAgricultural Growth Program-Agribusiness and Market DevelopmentATIAfrica Trade InsuranceATAAgricultural Transformation AgencyCBECommercial Bank of EthiopiaCRDBCommunity Rural Development Bank (Tanzania)CRSCommunity Warehouse Receipt SystemCSPCooperative Storage PlanDFIsDevelopment Finance InstitutionsEABCEthiopian Agricultural Business Corporation (former Agricultural Input Supply Enterprise and theformer Ethiopian Seed Enterprise)EACWSEEthiopia Agricultural Commodities Warehouse Services EnterpriseECAsExport Credit AgenciesECEAEthiopian Commodities Exchange AuthorityECX WRSEthiopia Commodity Exchange Warehouse Receipts SystemECXEthiopia Commodity ExchangeEDRIEthiopian Development Research InstituteEGTEEthiopian Grain Trade EnterpriseEIBEuropean Investment BankEIIDEEthiopian Industrial Inputs Development Enterprise (former Merchandise Wholesale & ImportTrade Enterprise)ETBEthiopian BirrETBCEthiopian Trading Business Corporation (former Ethiopian Trading Enterprise, EGTE, ETFruit)FAOFood and Agriculture OrganizationFCUFarmer Cooperative UnionGRNGoods Received NoteGTP IIGrowth and Transformation Plan IIIAIPsIntegrated Agro-Industrial ParksICTInformation Communication TechnologyIFADInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentIFCInternational Finance CorporationLMPLivestock Master PlanMFIMicro Finance InstituteNBMNational Bank of MalawiNDRMCNational Disaster Risk Management CommissionPCPrimary CooperativePOPrimary OrganizationRIAResearch ICT AfricaRUSACOsRural Saving and Credit CooperativesSFRAStrategic Food Reserve Agency (former Ethiopian Food Security Reserve Administration)SHFSmall Holder FarmerSIPStorage Investment PlanUSAIDUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentWRWarehouse ReceiptWRFWarehouse Receipt FinancingWRICOWarehouse Receipts and Inventory Collateral OfficeWRSWarehouse Receipt SystemAgricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chainsiv
EXECUTIVESUMMARYEthiopia’s agricultural sector has reported considerablegrowth rates over the past decade as the result ofan estimated doubling in the use of modern farminputs, rapid expansion of arable land, increasedlabor productivity, government investments in theextension system and an improved road network. Thesecond phase of Ethiopia’s Growth and TransformationPlan (GTP II) aims to maintain current high levels ofagricultural GDP growth over the 2015–2020 period.Several of the Agricultural Transformation AgendaDeliverables for the commercial orientation pillar of GTPII can be directly addressed or strengthened through anefficient Warehouse Receipt System (WRS), includingprovision of market services and infrastructure,promoting aggregation and storage use and availability,and fostering agro-processing, value addition andexports.It is expected that the Transformation AgendaDeliverables be operationalized in the Governmentof Ethiopia’s Agricultural Commercialization Clusters(ACCs), which aim to provide a strategic andcommercially viable platform for the development ofpriority agricultural commodity value chains through ageographically focused approach. It is proposed thatthe platforms will enable the implementation of multiplepriority interventions for agricultural transformationled growth and rural transformation. The primary goalof the ACCs is the commercialization of smallholderagriculture and agro-industrial development, offering astrategic entry point for private sector engagement.Ethiopia is considered as one of the pioneers of theWarehouse Receipt System (WRS) in Africa, havingfirst enacted a Proclamation for the Ministry of Trade toimplement and regulate such a system in 2003. TheEthiopia Commodity Exchange (ECX) was established in2008 and was assigned the responsibility of managingthe WRS. By insuring against operational risks theECX helped regain confidence from the banks tofinance receipts. In 2014 a new regulation led to theestablishment of the Ethiopian Agricultural CommoditiesWarehousing Service Enterprise (EACWSE), to providewarehouse management services. It was recentlyannounced that the EACWSE would be merged with itsmother organization the ECX by 1 July 2017, ostensiblydue to the weak performance of the warehouseservice provision under EACWSE management. Thisrestructuring of the ECX provides an ideal opportunityto take stock and revisit the question of whether theWRS linked to Warehouse Receipt Finance (WRF) canexpedite agricultural commercialization in Ethiopia,particularly within priority commodity value chainsfor tef, barley, maize and wheat. Maize and wheat arealready eligible for warehouse receipting on the ECX.With one of the core objectives of the ACCs to promotean integrated platform to implement multiple priorityinterventions across value chains and across sectors,there are several benefits to introducing the WRS tothe ACCs. First, the WRS assures quality of produceand same-standard commodities. Second, theWRS promotes market linkages though a commonmarketable instrument, the WR. Third, value additioncan be improved through increasing finance availabilityin the value chain though Warehouse Receipt Financing(WRF). Finally, the WRS facilitates aggregation.A marketable surplus is a prerequisite for a functioningWRS, however there are three further importantrequirements for success: first, the storability of theunderlying commodity should be high so as to ensurethat all the parties have trust that the value of theproduct is preserved over time; second, the expectedseasonal price differential, i.e. the gap between thetrough and peak prices, should be sufficient to cover thecost of storage and financing; and third, the price shouldfollow a predictable curve over the course of the seasonas any deviation from the normal seasonal patternimparts major risk to the parties involved. For thesereasons, this review of whether the WRS can expediteagricultural commercialization in Ethiopia assessesthe storability and historical seasonal price patterns ofprioritized commodities.Warehouse Receipt Financing can benefit severalactors in agricultural value chains: By storing andaccessing credit, producers can avoid forced sellingof commodities shortly after harvest when pricestend to be suppressed; commodity traders engagingin temporal arbitrage can access finance to coveroperational, storage and other costs, in addition toovercoming the problem of large opportunity costsassociated with financial capital locked up in storedAgricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chainsv
commodities; and agro-processors can enter intorepurchase agreements with banks or forward contractsusing a standardized Warehouse Receipt (WR) asapproved collateral.Despite various proclamations and extensive investmentin the exchange, the WRS has still not truly taken off inEthiopia. The lack of participation by producers, tradersand financial institutions is evident when looking atthe actual utilization of the WRS: To date only sesameand pea beans have been financed using the WRS,and only during 2011 and 2012. The success of WRSelsewhere, such as in South Africa and Malawi, lies intheir expansion of warehouse operations to all potentialactors—including primary cooperatives, cooperativeunions, private sector actors such as malt plants andfeed lots, traders, aid organizations and investors.Increased participation brings about economies ofscope and scale, making insurance, finance and storagecosts more affordable.Following an extensive review of the issues andchallenges, this study proposes the adoption of a multitiered WRS for Ethiopia—starting from producers atground level, followed by primary organizations (POs),then farmer cooperative unions (FCU), and eventuallyend users, such as traders, exporters, governmentagencies and aid organizations. The ACCs alreadyembrace all of these levels, and hence a formalizedand extended WRS will contribute to the objectives ofthe ACCs. However, building capacity will be crucialfor the successful roll out of the WRS. Prerequisiteskills include warehouse management, financingor marketing, grading of commodities and qualityassurance. Financiers will require capacity in carryingout collateral inspections and should be encouragedto increase liquidity between the different levels. Thecomplexity of products offered should gradually evolvefrom the producer- to end-market level: Insurancecompanies can offer different types of insuranceinstruments appropriate to the level of the system;and costly fidelity insurance becomes feasible if therisk is spread across the entire system. Ownership ofthe system at each level should reflect the primaryusers at that particular level. The PO should become amarket ‘one-stop-shop’ for producers to receive marketinformation, store produce, purchase inputs and accessloans. Cohesion throughout the entire system shouldbe brought about by a robust warehouse managementoversight enterprise made up of all the market actors.Once the EACWSE reunites with the ECX it should bea priority of the Exchange to reconsider the WRS. Thefollowing recommendations are made:1. SCOPEExpand the focus of the WRS from exported crops tomaize, wheat, tef and barley. Include all market actorsin the WRS. Expand warehouse operators to includeprivate companies and cooperative unionsInvestigate a potential sliding scale for the ETB 1million of capital requirement for warehouse operators,and publish clear directives for registration ofcooperatives as warehouse operators2. CAPACITYConduct a capacity audit of all market actors, followedby capacity building plan with ongoing training andsensitization at all levels. Publication of a simplestorage operator handbook accessible to all levels3. GRADINGAlign grade standards for all traded commoditiesacross all sectors, tiers, ACCs4. INVESTMENTCreate a Storage Investment Plan alongside the ATA’splanned National Storage Strategy to first analyzeconstraints and thereafter mobilize investment.Provide incentives for WRS investment such as taxbreaks and rebates for WR trade volumes. Addressfinancing constraints such as commercial bank bondpurchase requirement5. OVERSIGHTInclude members of all tiers in the WRS managementand oversight body / Ethiopian CommoditiesExchange Authority (ECEA). Review existing legislationwith the objective of creating a robust regulatoryorgan that can restore the integrity of the WRS6. ICTSeek evolution of the national telecommunicationsprovider to include services such as mobilemoney. Promote infrastructure investment oftelecommunications to increase rural accessibility.Agricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chainsvi
1. INTRODUCTIONEthiopia’s agricultural sector has reported considerablegrowth rates over the past decade as the result ofan estimated doubling in the use of modern farminputs, rapid expansion of arable land, increasedlabor productivity, government investments in theextension system and an improved road network. Thesecond phase of Ethiopia’s Growth and TransformationPlan (GTP II) aims to maintain current high levels ofagricultural GDP growth over the 2015–2020 period.Several of the Agricultural Transformation AgendaDeliverables for the commercial orientation pillar of GTPII are directly addressed or strengthened through anefficient Warehouse Receipt System (WRS), includingprovision of market services and infrastructure,promoting aggregation and storage use and availability,and fostering agro-processing, value addition andexports.It is expected that the Transformation AgendaDeliverables be operationalized in the Governmentof Ethiopia’s Agricultural Commercialization Clusters(ACCs), which provide a strategic and commerciallyviable platform for the development of priorityagricultural commodity value chains through ageographically focused approach. The platformsenable the implementation of multiple priorityinterventions for agricultural transformation-led growthand rural transformation. The primary goal of the ACCsis the commercialization of smallholder agriculture andagro-industrial development, offering a strategic entrypoint for private sector engagement.The proposed restructuring of the Ethiopia CommodityExchange (ECX) provides an ideal opportunity totake stock and revisit the question of whether theWarehouse Receipt System (WRS) linked to WarehouseReceipt Finance (WRF) can expedite agriculturalcommercialization in Ethiopia, specifically in thecontext of the establishment of four AgriculturalCommercialization Clusters (ACCs) and the AgriculturalTransformation Agency’s (ATA) Cooperative StoragePlan (CSP). This study assesses whether the WRS—through the provision of credit, the reduction of postharvest losses, and by linking producers, cooperativesand traders to agricultural value chains—can contributeto the fast-tracking of agricultural commercializationand transformation in the sector, as envisioned underthe second Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP II).The analysis focuses on tef, maize, wheat and barleyvalue chains, of which the latter three commodities arecurrently eligible for warehouse receipting on the ECX.Specific questions to be addressed inthis study are:a) Which of the ACC focus commodities are physicallysuitable for medium term storage?b) Is the historical seasonal price curve of thesecommodities favorable for medium term finance?c) Are there financial institutions with an appetite forWRF of these specific commodities?d) What are the alternatives to increase access toagricultural trade finance?A warehouse receipt (WR) is a document that providesproof of ownership of a specific volume of a commodity,with specific characteristics, that is stored in a specificwarehouse (Varangis and Larson, 1996). The commodityis graded by an accredited authority and then storedaccording to the standards, rules and regulations ofthe warehousing authority in order to maintain qualityand minimize post-harvest losses. Once issued, a WRcan be used as collateral for accessing loans or fordelivery against financial instruments such as forwardcontracts or futures contracts (Jayne et al. 2014). A wellfunctioning WRS can: (i) reduce post-harvest losses; (ii)reduce transaction costs; (iii) create awareness of and/or raise quality standards; (iv) permit the aggregationof commodities; (v) empower value chain agents tonegotiate for better prices; and (vi) facilitate access tocredit for all value chain actors, allowing them to buildup a credit history.Various studies have identified lack of access to creditas a major constraint to agricultural productivity inEthiopia and elsewhere. For example, Tilahun, D. (2015)found that two-thirds of Ethiopian rural households arecredit constrained. Despite rapid growth in the bankingsector and Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs), demandfar outweighs the supply of credit. Although agricultureaccounted for almost 17.3 % of bank lending in the2014/15 financial year (NBE annual report 2014/15),the majority of the finance is raised against fixedAgricultural Commercialization in Ethiopia: A Review of Warehouse Receipts in the Maize, Wheat, Sorghum and Tef Value Chains1
assets, which means many smallholders are excluded.Furthermore, the majority of the agricultural lending isdirected towards export facilities rather than domesticproduction and distribution (Agrifinfacility, 2012). Bynot exploiting the use of agricultural commodities ascollateral, the sector is possibly missing out on a majoropportunity to address its credit constraints.Warehouse Receipt Finance can empower and benefitmany actors in agricultural value chains: By storing andaccessing credit, producers can avoid forced sellingof commodities shortly after harvest when pricestend to be suppressed; commodity traders engagingin temporal arbitrage can access finance to coveroperational, storage and other costs—in addition toovercoming the problem of large opportunity costsassociated with financial capital locked up in storedcommodities; and agro-processors can enter intorepurchase agreements with banks or forward contractsusing standardized WR as approved collateral (asexplained in detail later in this study).There are three important prerequisites to thesuccess of a WRS and WRF. First, the storability of theunderlying commodity should be of a high standardso as to ensure that the all parties h
ECEA Ethiopian Commodities Exchange Authority ECX WRS Ethiopia Commodity Exchange Warehouse Receipts System ECX Ethiopia Commodity Exchange EDRI Ethiopian Development Research Institute . Ethiopia Commodity Exchange (ECX) was established in 2008 and was assigned the responsibility of managing the WRS. By insuring against operational risks the
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ethiopia - Land Degradation Neutrality National Report Degraded land under pressure in Hintalo-Wajirat district, South Eastern Zone, Tigray Region, Ethiopia (2015) (Photo by Yared Shumete) This report summarizes the key outcomes of the natio
Unexplored Heritage Tourism of Ethiopia: A Study of Tigray Region Dr. Alok Kumar Associate Professor Department of Tourism Management & Hospitality Studies IPHC Mekelle University, Ethiopia Abstract Ethiopia is country of ancient heritage, tradition and culture. Tigray region of Ethiopia has got a lo
called Ethiopia, Awakening Ethiopia, Ethiopia Awakening, or The Awakening of Ethiopia. A later, sixty-seven-inch plaster figure, similar in design, is pictured here (frontispiece).2 Art historians such as David Driskell, Judith Wilson, and Richard Powell have rightly discussed this sculpture in terms of its Pan-African ideals and the way in
Aggregation Study Report [CoST-Ethiopia] Page ii 40 Construction Sector Transparency Initiative - Ethiopia AGGREGATION, ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISCLOSURE AND ASSURANCE REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS COVERED BY CoST - ETHIOPIA STUDY REPORT Study Team Asmerom Taddese Hagos Abdea Kasiem Seid (ST leader) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia November 2016
The following At-A-Glance charts present comparative admission, cost, curricula and other relevant information about the state universities. . Agricultural Communications Agricultural Economics Agricultural Industries Agricultural Mechanization Agricultural Occupational Education Agricultural Production Agricultural Science Agronomy, Field Crops
Opening Doors: A Performance Evaluation of the Development Credit Authority (DCA) in Ethiopia Wolday Amha, Consultant William M. Butterfield, Mission Economist, USAID/Ethiopia Fasika Jiffar, Senior SME Development Specialist, USAID/Ethiopia Leila Ahlstrom, Financial Management Specialist, USAID/DCA USAID/Ethiopia May 2016, Addis Ababa Cre dit .
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health Review of Policy Documents On Climate Change, WASH and Public Health in Ethiopia September 2015 . Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ii . Executive Summary . Ministry of Health has commissioned a “Review of Policy Documents on Climate Change,
API RP 505, Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities Classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1, and Zone 2, 2002, reaffirmed 2013. 2.3.2 ASHRAE Publications. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning EngineersASHRAE, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305. ASHRAE 15ASHRAE STD 15, Safety Standard for .