Final Report Measuring Sustainability In Infrastructure .

2y ago
19 Views
2 Downloads
1.36 MB
77 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Sabrina Baez
Transcription

Final ReportMeasuring Sustainability inInfrastructure InvestmentA Case Study Assessment of Selected Standards and ToolsOctober 2020

About World Wildlife FundFor nearly 60 years, WWF has been protecting the future of nature. The world’s leadingconservation organization, WWF works in 100 countries and is supported by more than onemillion members in the United States and close to five million globally. WWF's unique wayof working combines global reach with a foundation in science, involves action at every levelfrom local to global, and ensures the delivery of innovative solutions that meet the needs ofboth people and nature.About Guggenheim InvestmentsGuggenheim Investments (GI) is the asset management and investment advisory division ofGuggenheim Partners, a global diversified financial services firm. GI has more than 220 billion*in total assets across fixed income, equity, and alternative strategies. GI focuses on the returnand risk needs of insurance companies, corporate and public pension funds, sovereign wealthfunds, endowments and foundations, consultants, wealth managers, and high-net-worthinvestors. As a global asset manager, GI seeks to deliver exceptional, long-term value to itsclients while managing its business with strong governance, sustainable business practices, anda workplace built on respect and community engagement. GI’s work in pursuing sustainabledevelopment goals seeks to advance safe, reliable infrastructure and financing innovation inways that preserve and protect the environment and contribute to a better world.*Guggenheim Investments assets under management are as of 6.30.2020. The assets include leverage of 13bn for assets under management.Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim PartnersInvestment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Fund Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC,Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC and Guggenheim Partners IndiaManagement. Guggenheim Investments has not made any commitment to participate, and may not participate in the projects assessed in thisReport on behalf of its clients.Guggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report2

Foreword by Scott Minerd and Carter RobertsThe estimates are staggeringly high for the level of investment in infrastructure that will be necessaryto achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), facilitate the growth ofdeveloping countries, and upgrade the existing stock of aging capital assets around the world. Notonly is the need great but the need to do it right is even greater. If new and upgraded infrastructurestock is poorly planned or executed, the damage to the world’s ecosystems and social developmentcould outweigh the desired benefits.The good news is that two important advancements are converging in the area of sustainableinfrastructure finance. First, sustainable infrastructure is growing as an asset class among institutionalScott Minerdinvestors and asset managers, particularly as they increasingly focus their capital allocations throughthe lens of environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. The past few years have witnessed anawakening in the finance sector around the roles and responsibilities of asset owners and managers inprioritizing investments to secure a healthy and stable planet and global economy. This has been mostpronounced with respect to addressing the climate crisis and the “E” in ESG.Now this trend must be placed in the context of responding to the COVID-19 crisis. While individualcountries and the international community have struggled to meet their immediate health systemneeds, attention has now firmly turned to the “S” in ESG—to health security, to job preservation andcreation, and to restarting global and local economies in a just and equitable manner. With low interestCarter Robertsrates and huge commitments of public-private partnerships for funding economic stimulus, spendingon infrastructure is likely to expand significantly. This creates an even more urgent case for developingclear and widely accepted sustainable infrastructure standards so these investments can support thetransition toward climate-positive, safe and equitable economies and societies.The second promising development in sustainable infrastructure finance is that we are movingcloser to seeing the adoption of a set of consistent methodologies and metrics for sustainabilitymeasurement that will be necessary to attract significant institutional capital. We still have work todo, but this project, “Measuring Sustainability in Infrastructure Investment" is an important part ofthat process.In this report, researchers from KPMG and Mott MacDonald applied a selection of ESG andsustainability standards to two different operating infrastructure assets: the Yatí-Bodega RoadInterconnection in Bolivar, Colombia and the Carlsbad Desalination Plant in Carlsbad, California.The objective of the report is to assess the effectiveness and the practicalities of implementing thesestandards for investors. The research is the latest product of an ongoing collaboration between ourtwo organizations on sustainable infrastructure investing, including a 2018 study we commissioned byStanford University Global Projects Center (SGPC), “State of the Practice: Sustainability Standards forInfrastructure Investors.” Three standards identified in the SGPC study were assessed in this project:The International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards (PS) and Equator Principles (EP)(considered as one standard for the purpose of this research), Envision and the UN SDGs. In addition,the research assessed impact measurement and valuation (IMV) as an infrastructure investmentGuggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report3

decision-making tool. IMV measures the economic, environmental and social impacts of infrastructureassets using the single metric of monetary value.The key insights, conclusions and recommendations in this paper move us closer to adoptingcommonly used standards and measurements that must be in place before sustainable infrastructureinvesting becomes an institutional asset class. We want to commend the team at KPMG, led by MarkMcKenzie and Frits Klaver, and the team at Mott MacDonald, led by Niniane Tozzi, for their work onthis important endeavor.Scott MinerdCarter RobertsChairman of Investments andPresidentGlobal Chief Investment OfficerWorld Wildlife FundGuggenheim PartnersGuggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report4

AcknowledgementsSustainable infrastructure projects must play a foundational role in achieving the SustainableDevelopment Goals. Even with ramped up government spending in response to the COVID-19 crisis,private investment will still be needed to meet growing infrastructure demands. Fortunately, thereis sufficient private capital available to help fund these projects, either through partnering withgovernments or as standalone investments. Moreover, the holders of this capital are increasinglyseeking investments that can earn sufficient returns while also contributing solutions to climate,environmental and social challenges. One important key to unlocking this capital is for a set ofsustainability standards and measurement tools to be commonly adopted by investors, developers,and regulators.James PassThis study was commissioned with the intention of furthering progress toward such internationallyrecognized norms and standards to enable greater allocation of private capital by a diversified set ofinstitutional investors to sustainability objectives. We believe the authors have moved us closer to thisgoal and unlocking that vital private capital.Guggenheim Investments and World Wildlife Fund thank KPMG and Mott MacDonald for havingled this project. In particular, we would like to recognize the contributions of Frits Klaver and MarkMcKenzie of KPMG as well as Niniane Tozzi of Mott MacDonald, who served as the lead authors, withkey contributions from team members Nikki van Dam and Vera Moll of KPMG, and Marielle RowanDavid McCauleyand Kristy McConnel of Mott MacDonald. They were supported by Richard Threlfall, Global Headof Infrastructure at KPMG. We also appreciate the support of many others who contributed theirexpertise and perspectives, and without whose advice this product would not have come to fruition.At Guggenheim, this includes Michael Perkinson, Chief of Staff to the Global Chief Investment Officer,who has overseen these and related efforts, as well as the helpful inputs of Ning Liu and JeremyDiamond. Kate Newman, who leads WWF’s work on sustainable infrastructure, was involved withthe study from the start with inputs and support from her colleagues Evan Freund, Helena Wright,Joanne Lee, and Collin Lawson. Finally, we should acknowledge the facilitating efforts of colleagues atHandshake, especially Robert Ludke, and the support of Alex Davis and Julia Cox.Quantifying criteria to help determine and certify the sustainability contributions of an infrastructureproject is no small task. In the face of the need for stimulus investments across the globe to supportthe COVID-19 recovery, we can expect a surge in demand for infrastructure spending. We hope thisstudy will help remind all involved that both public and private capital can and should be directedtoward those investments which will simultaneously address COVID-19 recovery needs and supportprogress toward sustainability goals. While we have not yet reached convergence around a specific setof tools and standards, the report shows that there are already plenty of good options available.Sincerely,James PassDavid McCauleyGlobal Head, Project FinanceSenior VP, Global Partnerships Multilateral AffairsGuggenheim InvestmentsWorld Wildlife FundGuggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report5

Table of ContentsIntroduction.7Background to This Study. 7Standards and Tools Tested.9IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles.9Envision. 11United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).12Impact Measurement & Valuation.12Infrastructure Projects on Which the Standards and Tools Were Tested. 14Project 1: Yatí - Bodega Road interconnection, Bolívar, Colombia. 14Research Methodology. 18Scoring Methodology.23Limitations to the research.23Results. 241. IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles.24How to apply the standard or tool.24Applying the standard or tool to the selected project(s).26The results. 30Key benefits and challenges.31Effectiveness for investors.322. Envision. 37How to apply the standard or tool. 37Applying the standard or tool to the selected project. 40The results.42Key benefits and challenges.45Effectiveness for investors.453. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. 49How to apply the standard or tool. 49Applying the standard or tool to the selected project(s). 49The results. 50Key benefits and challenges.53Effectiveness for investors.534. Impact Measurement & Valuation.57How to apply the standard or tool.57Applying the standard or tool to the selected project(s).57The results.59Key benefits and challenges.62Effectiveness for investors.63Conclusions and Recommendations. 68IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles. 68Envision. 69UN Sustainable Development Goals. 69Impact Measurement and Valuation (IMV). 70Key Insights.72Recommendations.73Appendix 1: Glossary.75Guggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report6

IntroductionBackground to This StudyThis analysis was commissioned by Guggenheim Investments (Guggenheim) and the World WildlifeFund US (WWF) as part of an ongoing collaboration between the two organizations to betterunderstand parameters of and promote investment in sustainable infrastructure. Through thiscollaboration, Guggenheim and WWF aim to support the United Nations (UN) Sustainable DevelopmentGoals (SDGs) by enabling future infrastructure to be sustainable and resilient and by protecting thenatural assets that benefit society and economies.In order to deliver the SDGs and support the expanding human population, 90 trillion1 in infrastructureinvestment worldwide is required between 2015 and 2030. This represents a doubling of theannual global infrastructure investment in 2015. This level of investment is necessary to replaceageing infrastructure in developed economies and to facilitate the growth of developing countriesand emerging markets. Furthermore, this needs to happen in the context of a changing climate andCOVID-19. If this new infrastructure stock is planned, sited and designed poorly, the result willbe damage to ecosystems, compromised economic and social development goals, and weakenedresilience of supply chains.Investors need effective,It is therefore imperative that investors are enabled to direct capital to sustainable and resilientreliable and credibleinfrastructure projects that will deliver optimal outcomes both for people and for the ecosystems onstandards and assessmentwhich our societies depend. Investors need effective, reliable and credible standards and assessmenttools to help themtools to help them understand the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance ofunderstand the ESGthe infrastructure projects in which they invest, and to improve the impacts and outcomes of theirperformance of theinvestment decision-making. Furthermore, it is important for investors to know not only how theirinfrastructure projectsinvestments impact society, but also what impact environmental and social phenomena such as climatein which they invest.change might have on the performance and value of assets and what that means in terms of risksand returns.However, many investors lack established tools and processes to assess the ESG performance ofinfrastructure project assets and factor these into their project screening and selection processes.A diverse array of ESG assessment frameworks, standards and tools is available with yet more beingdeveloped and introduced every year but few, if any, have been developed specifically for investorneeds. This has led some investors to develop their own ESG assessment tools. There is therefore aclear and urgent need for greater consistency and convergence in terms of how infrastructure investorsfactor ESG into their investment decisions.In order to address this challenge, the Stanford Global Projects

Guggenheim Investments WWF KPMG Mott MacDonald Report 4 decision-making tool. IMV measures the economic, environmental and social impacts of infrastructure assets using the single metric of monetary value. The key insights, conclusions and recommendations in this paper move us closer to adopting

Related Documents:

Final Exam Answers just a click away ECO 372 Final Exam ECO 561 Final Exam FIN 571 Final Exam FIN 571 Connect Problems FIN 575 Final Exam LAW 421 Final Exam ACC 291 Final Exam . LDR 531 Final Exam MKT 571 Final Exam QNT 561 Final Exam OPS 571

1.3. Why Develop a Sustainability Plan? 5 1.4. Relationship to Other ICLEI Tools and Programs 6 1.5. Lessons Learned from NYC 7 2. Scope of a Sustainability Plan 8 2.1. Sustainability Plans vs. Climate Action Plans 8 2.2. Typical Elements of a Sustainability Plan 10 3. Overview of the Five Milestones for Sustainability 11 4. Forming a Team 16

The Office of Sustainability used UC Berkeley's inventory of sustainability courses as the baseline of which courses to map by UN SDG. The courses on the sustainability course inventory are from 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years. UC Berkeley's sustainability course list was developed for the Sustainability, Tracking,

Introduction 27 Readly's prioritised sustainability aspects 30 Sustainability governance 40 Auditor's opinion regarding the statutory sustainability report 41 Governance Remuneration Report 2020 42 Board of Directors 44 Senior Management Team 46 Directors' Report 48 Risk and risk management 52 The Readly share 59 Corporate Governance Report 62

2 Drive Sustainability Progress Report ABOUT DRIVE SUSTAINABILITY I. ABOUT DRIVE SUSTAINABILITY Drive Sustainability is an automotive partnership with the following Lead Partners - BMW Group, Daimler AG, Scania CV AB, Volkswagen Group, Volvo CarsVolvo Group, - and the following Partners - FordHonda, , Jaguar Lan

approach to sustainability and sustainability communications. Please send your feedback to: Zuellig Pharma Sustainability Team sustainability@zuelligpharma.com BOUNDARY AND SCOPE The information contained in this report pertains to the period January 1 to December 31, 2020 and covers Zuellig Pharma's operations across 13 markets. Where .

per IEC 60751 Class A Measuring deviation of the transmitter per IEC 60770 0.25 K Total measuring deviation according to IEC 60770 Measuring deviation of the measuring element the transmitter Measuring span Minimum 20 K, maximum 300 K Basic configuration Measuring range 0 . 150

2019 Sustainability Performance Report. We provide a suite of information about the Group’s Full Year 2019 performance. As well as our Sustainability Performance Report, further information can be found in our Annual Report, Full Year Financial Results, Annual Review and Sustainability Report, and Investor Discussion Pack. Financials