Scope And Definition Of The Concept Of Operations For The .
EXPLORATORY RESEARCHScope and definition ofthe concept of operationsfor the projectDeliverable D2.1APACHEGrant:Call:Topic:Consortium coordinator:699338H2020-SESAR-2015-1ER-11-2015 (ATM performance)Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Edition date:6 February 2017Edition:01.00.00
EDITION 01.00.00Authoring & ApprovalAuthors of the documentName/BeneficiaryPosition/TitleDateGeorgina Ansaldo – ALGWP2 Leader01/12/2016Vladimir Coca – ALGContributor01/12/2016Maria Inês Costa – ALGContributor01/12/2016Sergio Ruiz – UPCContributor01/12/2016Xavier Prats – UPCContributor01/12/2016Obrad Babic – UB-FTTEContributor01/12/2016Fedja Netjasov – UB-FTTEContributor01/12/2016Bojana Mirkovic – UB-FTTEContributor01/12/2016Tatjana Krstic Simic – UB-FTTEContributor01/12/2016Andrija Vidosavljevic – ENACContributor01/12/2016Daniel Delahaye – TitleDateXavier Prats – UPCAPACHE Coordinator15/12/2016Rubén Martínez – ALGALG researcher15/12/2016Sergio Ruiz – UPCUPC researcher15/12/2016Reviewers internal to the projectApproved for submission to the SJU By — Representatives of beneficiaries involved in the projectName/BeneficiaryPosition/TitleDateXavier Prats – UPCAPACHE Coordinator20/12/2016Vladimir Coca - ALGALG Principal Investigator20/12/2016Fedja Netjasov – UB-FTTEUB-FTTE Principal Investigator20/12/2016Daniel Delahaye –ENACENAC Principal Investigator20/12/2016Rejected By - Representatives of beneficiaries involved in the projectName/Beneficiary2Position/Title – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditionsDate
SCOPE AND DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THEPROJECTDocument 127/05/2016DraftALGDocument structure with section titles00.00.0208/06/2016DraftAllFirst draft with contributions by all partners00.00.0305/07/2016DraftAllUpdates on all sections after SJU KOM00.00.0413/07/2016DraftALGAddition of Section 5 and Attachment A00.00.0521/07/2016DraftUPCDocument re-structuring and addition of Section 200.00.0625/07/2016DraftAllDocument update for draft delivery to the SJU00.00.0701/08/2016DraftAllDocument revision internal to the project.00.01.0003/08/2016DeliverableAllFinal document for delivery00.01.0125/10/2016DraftALGFirst proposed structure after SJU assessment00.01.0228/10/2016DraftUPCProposed structure after SJU assessment with UPCamendments00.01.0311/11/2016DraftAllFirst draft with contributions by all partners toproposed structure after SJU assessment00.01.0428/11/2016DraftALGConsolidation of partner contributions anddocument revision00.01.0502/12/2016DraftUPCAmendments to APACHE system description00.01.0606/12/2016DraftAllDocument revision and comments on all sections00.01.0712/12/2016DraftUPCAmendments on all sections00.01.0813/12/2016DraftAllUpdates on all sections00.01.0917/12/2016DraftAllDocument revision internal to the project00.01.1019/12/2016DraftAllFinal revision and approval internal to the project.00.02.0021/12/2016DeliverableAllFinal document version 00.02.00 for delivery01.00.0006/02/2017SJU approved versionDirect approval of v00.02.00Dissemination levelThis document is PUBLIC. – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions.3
EDITION 01.00.00APACHEASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT ATM OPERATIONS AND OF NEWCONCEPTS OF OPERATIONS FOR ITS HOLISTIC ENHANCEMENTThis Document1 is part of a project that has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking undergrant agreement No 699338 under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovationprogramme.AbstractThe APACHE project proposes a new approach to assess European ATM performance based onsimulation, optimization and performance assessment tools that will be able to capture the complexinterdependencies between KPAs at different modelling scales.This document is the baseline for the Project and defines the operational context which encompassesthe evaluation studies that will be carried out in the Project. The baseline and SESAR 2020 targetoperations definition within the context of APACHE will permit to settle the scope of the project andtrace it within the context of the SESAR programme. This traceability is carried out as per SESARsolutions to be assessed, that could be assessed or that enable other solutions to be assessed withinthe Project.1The opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s view only. Under no circumstances shall the SESAR Joint Undertaking beresponsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.4 – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions
SCOPE AND DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THEPROJECTTable of ContentsAbstract. 41Introduction . 71.1Purpose, context and scope of the document . 71.2Document structure . 81.3SESAR 2020 context and definitions . 81.3.11.3.21.3.31.42Glossary and Definition of Terms . 9The APACHE Project . 132.1Background and motivation . 132.2Project scope and objectives . 142.2.12.2.22.2.33SESAR Solution . 8Capability. 8Operating Environments . 8Assumptions and limitations of the Project . 14Operating Environments and Stakeholders . 15Link with SESAR Solutions . 162.3Research approach . 182.4Research questions and expected outcomes . 22The APACHE System . 243.1Background Tools . 253.2Baseline Operations (current ATM model) . 4.13.4.2Airspace Organisation and Management . 28Demand and Capacity Balancing (DCB) . 31Flight Planning . 33Separation and Conflict Management . 36Target Operations (SESAR 2020 ATM model) . 39Flight Planning and Trajectory Management . 42Advanced Demand and Capacity Balancing (Advanced DCB, or dDCB) . 45Dynamic Airspace Configuration and Advanced Airspace Management . 52Separation and Conflict Management . 55Performance Analyser . 58Computation of Performance Indicators (PIs). 59Risk Assessment module . 604Conclusions . 625References . 63Appendix AComplete SESAR Solutions list . 66 – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions.5
EDITION 01.00.00List of figuresFigure 1-1. Context of deliverable D2.1 . 7Figure 2-1. The APACHE simulator framework . 19Figure 3-1. The APACHE System . 24Figure 3-2. Swiss Cheese Model representing the main safety layers of current ATM . 27Figure 3-3. APACHE System configuration to model current ATM operations . 28Figure 3-4. Network oriented approach for airspace organization and management (EUROCONTROL Network Manager, 2015c) . 29Figure 3-5. Dynamo architecture . 36Figure 3-6. Example of trajectory calculated with DYNAMO . 36Figure 3-7. Two trajectories in conflict (red circle) and four different trajectory amendments found byGOA . 38Figure 3-8. Swiss Cheese Model representing the main safety layers of SESAR 2020 target ATM . 40Figure 3-9. APACHE Framework configuration to model SESAR 2020 target ATM operations . 41Figure 3-10. Development of the Business Trajectory under SESAR TBO/PBO concept of operations 42Figure 3-11. Different phases of a 4D trajectory . 43Figure 3-12. Global conflict resolution is a highly combinatorial problem . 50Figure 3-13. Scenario of ECAC as a single sector with 4010 and more than 300 conflict (left) and globallyde-conflicted scenario with 283 flight routes modified (right) . 51Figure 3-14. Airspace management in SESAR environment overview (EUROCONTROL, 2013) . 52Figure 3-15: Airspace blocks - SAMs building process . 54Figure 3-16: Example of the graph partitioning . 54Figure 3-17. Interaction between APACHE-TAP and Performance Analyser . 58Figure 3-18. APACHE PA module and knowledge generation . 59Figure 3-19. Situation in which conflict between two aircraft exist (Netjasov, 2012) . 61List of tablesTable 1-1. Glossary of terms. 12Table 2-1. Upper limit of main European TMAs . 15Table 2-2. SESAR solutions relevant to the APACHE project . 18Table 2-3. Preliminary set of scenarios for research . 22Table 3-1. Summary of existing tools . 25Table 3-2. Hierarchy of tactical trajectory resolutions . 39Table A-1. SESAR Solutions list 696 – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions
SCOPE AND DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THEPROJECT1 Introduction1.1 Purpose, context and scope of the documentThe APACHE Project covers the topic ER-11-2015 – ATM Performance within the area of ATMOperations, Architecture, Performance and Validation and proposes a new approach based onsimulation, optimization and performance assessment tools, which aims to capture complexinterdependencies between Key Performance Areas (KPA) at different modelling scales (micro, mesoand macro).This Deliverable D2.1 - Scope and definition of the concept of operations for the project, can be seen asthe baseline document of the Project. It is the sole output of Project's work package (WP) 2: WP2 Scope and definition of the concept of operations and aims to set the different contexts of operationsthat will be considered in the new APACHE system developed within the Project. From this operationalcontext, the scope of the Project is concreted and a set of SESAR solutions is identified to be subjectof study during the assessing activities of the Project. Finally, D2.1 aims to set up the pavement of thepotential evolution of the concept towards higher levels of maturity.This Document is the main input for WP3 - Key performance indicators (KPI) review and definition ofnovel KPIs, where a review of current KPIs for the contexts of operations identified in this D2.1 will beperformed, together with a proposal for new indicators, which could be computed with the APACHEsystem developed in this Project. As result, WP3 will produce Deliverable D3.1 - Review of current KPIsand proposal for new ones. Moreover, D2.1 and D3.1 will provide with the essential information toidentify the functional requirements for the APACHE framework. Thus, as final output for WP3,Deliverable D3.2 - Functional requirements and specification for the ATM performance assessmentframework will be produced, serving as starting point for WP4 - Development of the APACHEframework (see Figure 1-1 below).Figure 1-1. Context of deliverable D2.1 – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions.7
EDITION 01.00.001.2 Document structureThe document is structured as follows: Section 1: Purpose, context and scope of the document; document structure; SESAR contextand definitions, Glossary and definition of terms.Section 2: The APACHE Project is presented, summarising its background and motivation, itshigh-level objectives and outcomes and, briefly, the research approach proposed.Section 3: The APACHE system is described, including the basic elements of both the currentATM paradigm and the SESAR 2020 target ATM paradigm that should be modelled to capturethe main actors and stakeholders of the ATM, together with their principal performancedrivers and interrelations between the same.Section 4: concludes this report.1.3 SESAR 2020 context and definitionsAs the project is encompassed within the SESAR 2020 framework, some concepts need to be clarifiedin order to understand the context of this document. This section details several SESAR definitions andconcepts.1.3.1 SESAR SolutionThe SESAR 2020 programme output is defined and packed in the form of “SESAR Solutions”. SESARSolutions contain outputs from R&I activities which relate to either an Operational Improvement (OI)step or group of OI steps and associated enablers which have been designed, developed and validatedin response to validation targets that when implemented, will deliver performance improvements toEuropean ATM (SESAR Joint Undertaking, 2015b).Appendix A of this document contains a complete list of the SESAR solutions that have been identifiedin the course of activities of APACHE WP2 (SESAR Joint Undertaking, 2016a, 2016b).1.3.2 CapabilityA Capability is the collective ability to deliver a specified type of effect or a specified course of action.Within the context of the SESAR Programme, a capability is therefore the ability to support the deliveryof a specific operational concept to an agreed level of performance (EUROCONTROL, 2015e).1.3.3 Operating EnvironmentsThe R&D solutions under SESAR 2020, will contribute to the improvements and benefits to be realisedthrough the gradual implementation and deployment of the SESAR ConOps. The following aspects offour operational environments (airport, en-route, TMA and network) need to be considered for SESAR2020 (SESAR Joint Undertaking, 2016c): 8Traffic Characteristics (including Airport) - Presented by Long term forecasting with horizonsof up to twenty years, as indicated in (EUROCONTROL, 2013). – 2016 – APACHE consortiumAll rights reserved. Licensed to the SESAR Joint Undertaking under conditions
SCOPE AND DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THEPROJECT Capacity Characteristics (SESAR Joint Undertaking, 2015a):o Airports: Combination of Utilisation / Layout.o TMA: Low Medium/High Complexity.o En Route: For En Route Operating Environments, the categories are based on theComplexity score (a composite measure combining traffic density (concentration oftraffic in space and time) with structural complexity (structure of traffic flows)described in the PRR Report 2013 (EUROCONTROL, 2014). See Section 2.2.2 of thisdocument for more information.Airport Capacity - Presented in (EUROCONTROL, 2013)Environmental Impact - Presented in (EUROCONTROL, 2013)1.4 Glossary and Definition of TermsA list of the important terminology and acronyms used in this document is presented below. They aretaken, when available, from the SESAR ATM Lexicon (EUROCONTROL, TCOATFCMATFMATMATSATSUExplanation(Advanced) Flexible Use of AirspaceAirborne Collision Avoidance SystemArea Control CentreATFCM Daily PlanAutomatic Dependent Surveillance – BroadcastAutomatic Dependant Surveillance - ContractAeronautical mobile airport communication systemAtlantic Interoperability InitiativeArrival ManagementATFCM Notification MessageAir Navigation Service ProviderAircraft OperatorAirport Operations CentreAirport Operations PlanAssessment of performance in current ATM operations and of new concepts ofoperations for its holistic enhancementAlternative Position, Navigation and TimingAirspace Reservation/RestrictionAirborne Separation Assurance SystemAirspace Organisation and ManagementAirspace Planning (APACHE system module)Airspace ManagementAir Traffic ControlAir Traffic ControllerAir traffic flow and capacity managementAir traffic flow managementAir traffic managementAir Traffic ServiceAir Traffic Services Unit – 2016 – APACHE consortium
00.00.04 13/07/2016 Draft ALG Addition of Section 5 and Attachment A 00.00.05 21/07/2016 Draft UPC Document re-structuring and addition of Section 2 00.00.06 25/07/2016 Draft All Document update for draft delivery to the SJU 00.00.07 01/08/2016 Draft All Document revision internal to the project.
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được
Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .
More than words-extreme You send me flying -amy winehouse Weather with you -crowded house Moving on and getting over- john mayer Something got me started . Uptown funk-bruno mars Here comes thé sun-the beatles The long And winding road .
