Removal Of Heavy Metal Ions From Industrial Wastewater By .

3y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
990.34 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Harley Spears
Transcription

Almalih et al., J Environ Anal Toxicol 2015, 5:5DOI: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Journal ofl ToxicologicaytEnvironmental & Analytical Toxicologyyofrnal Enviroouental & AnalnmJISSN: 2161-0525Research ArticleResearchArticleOpenAccessAccessOpenRemoval of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater by ScoleciteAlmalih MA1*, Salih A1, Dafaallah AA2, Magid SAA3, Gizouli AME1 and Tilal AS1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, SudanDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Elnelain University, Sudan12AbstractIt is a strategic target now to reuse treated industrial waste water for washing, irrigation etc., to efficiently manageand maximize Sudanese's water resources. The aim of the present work was to study the performance of natural zeolite(scolecite) for removing heavy metals from industrial waste water. Natural zeolite deposit sample was collected fromBayooda desert. Natural zeolite used (scolecite) was characterized by XRD, XRF, SEM and FTIR instruments. Thephysical properties (pH, EC, TDS, COD, BOD, total hardness) and chemical properties (Ni2 , Pb2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 , Cr3 )of the collected industrial waste water samples were investigated. Zeolite sorbed around 95.8, 88.1, 48, 50, 19.7 and99.9% of Ni2 , Pb2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 and Cr3 metal concentrations respectively. According to the percentage sorptionvalues, the selectivity sequence of studied metals by natural zeolite can be given as Cr3 Ni2 Pb2 Cd2 Zn2 Fe3 .These results show that natural zeolites hold great potential to remove cationic heavy metal species from industrialwastewater.Keywords: Scolecite; Industrial wastewater; Heavy metal ionsMaterials and MethodsIntroductionThe sample of natural zeolite scolecite collected from Bayoudadesert. It locates west of Kadabas, and south of Nubian Desert. TheBayouda volcanic field located:Scolecite is a tectosilicate mineral belonging to the zeolite group; itis a hydrated calcium silicate, CaAl2Si3O10 3H2O. Only minor amountsof sodium and traces of potassium substitute for calcium. There is anabsence of barium, strontium, iron and magnesium [1,2]. Scoleciteis isostructural (having the same structure) with the sodium-calciumzeolite mesolite and the sodium zeolite natrolite, but it does not forma continuous chemical series with either of them [1]. It was describedin 1813, and named from the Greek word, σκώληξ 'worm' becauseof its reaction to the blowpipe flame. Scolecite is a common zeolite.It is a mineral of secondary origin, and occurs with other zeolites inthe amygdaloidal cavities (cavities filled with secondary minerals) ofweathered basalts, also in gneisses and amphibolites, and in laccolithsand dikes derived from syenitic and gabbroic magmas, and in contactmetamorphic zones. It is a hydrothermal mineral derived from lowtemperature alteration of basalts and related rocks, associated withother zeolites, calcite, quartz and prehnite. It can be found on top ofthe calcium zeolites heulandites, stilbite and epistilbite [2]. Associatedminerals include quartz, apophyllite, babingtonite, heulandite, stilbiteand other zeolites. Due to their structural characteristics, naturalzeolites can be used in several applications, from which Pansini [3]reviewed those of environmental interest. For example Zamzow etal. [4] used clinoptilolite to remove Al, Fe, Cu, and Zn from coppermine wastewater to below drinking water standards. Ouki andKavannagh [5] showed that clinoptilolite and chabazite differ in theirperformance regarding capacity and selectivity. Other authors havedemonstrated natural zeolites exhibit excellent selectivity a number ofhazardous cations, a very moderate environmental impact [6-8]. Thecharacteristics of industrial wastewater vary widely from industry toindustry, and even within the same industry, depending on the rawmaterials used, processes employed, and various other factors [9].Natural zeolites are especially attractive for removing heavy metal ionsfrom effluent wastewaters mainly of industrial origin [5]. Zeolite mediais a versatile product; it works the same way as any cation exchanger.Ca2 , Mg2 and heavy metals ions are replaced on one to one basiswith sodium or potassium through the ion exchange process [11].Our objective in this study is to investigate the removal of inorganicpollutants like Ni2 , Pb2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 and Cr3 metal ions from amodel solution by the scolecite natural zeolite (SNZ).J Environ Anal ToxicolISSN: 2161-0525 JEAT, an open access journalLatitude: 18.330 18.20′0″NLongitude: 32.75 32.45′0″EThere are four industrial wastewaters from:1.Tannery in Khartoum.2.Paints factory in Khartoum industrial area.3.Petroleum water from Foloug field in Southern Sudan.4.Mahmoud Sharif's electricity station. Samples collected andstored in one liter plastic container, and kept in refrigerator.ChemicalsHCl (0.1M), NaCl (1M), sulfuric acid reagent (453.5 mL conc.H2SO4 5.5 g Ag2SO4), standard potassium dichromate (4.913 gK2Cr2O7 in 167 mL H2SO4 33.3 g HgSO4 and dilute to 1 Liter), standardferrous ammonium sulfate (0.1M), ferrion indicator. Phosphate buffer,magnesium sulfate, calcium chloride, ferric chloride and manganese(II)sulfate solution. EDTA (4 g disodium salt in 500 mL distilled waterand dilute to (1 Liter). Total hardness buffer solution. Total hardnessindicator tablets.Instruments1.X-Ray diffract meter (XRD), system: Philips, Model: X-pert*Corresponding author: Almalih MA, Department of Chemistry, Faculty ofScience and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan, Tel: 249 (187) 511525; Email: zubairmaleeh@yahoo.comReceived April 01, 2015; Accepted June 13, 2015; Published June 18, 2015Citation: Almalih MA, Salih A, Dafaallah AA, Magid SAA, Gizouli AME, et al. (2015)Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater by Scolecite. J EnvironAnal Toxicol 5: 302. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Copyright: 2015 Almalih MA, et al. This is an open-access article distributedunder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal author and source are credited.Volume 5 Issue 5 1000302

Citation: Almalih MA, Salih A, Dafaallah AA, Magid SAA, Gizouli AME, et al. (2015) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater byScolecite. J Environ Anal Toxicol 5: 302. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Page 2 of 5PRO stress XRD analyzer Cu-target radiation.2.Atomic Absorption spectrophotometer (A.A.S); PerkinElmer Model; 2380, flame double beam systems.3.X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Model: ARL 9900 Series, Intellipower X-ray analyzer. Thermo Scientific, Belgium.4.Infra-Red (IR) Spectrophotometer: Model: FTIR -8400S,Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer, Shimadzu.5.Scanning Electron Microscope: Model: TESCAN. OxfordInstrument Company, using energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS)system.6.Conductivity Meter: Model 4320 Jenway.7.pH Meter: Model Corning Pinnacle 555 pH ion meter.8.COD Reactor.MethodA sample of (scolecite natural zeolite) 2 g as Na- Zeolite (315500 µm) grain-size was placed in a beaker. Before determinedconcentrations of heavy metal ions from industrial wastewater samples,adjusted to decrease (pH) with Nitric acid. Then was added 50 mLindustrial wastewater which had six heavy metal ions (Ni2 , Pb2 , Zn2 ,Cd2 , Fe3 , and Cr3 ) To facilitate extraction of the heavy metal ions.Stirring: vigorous shaking was applied for 10 min as contact time. Thesolution was then filtered at room temperature 25 C, and the filtratewas analyzed by (A.A.S) to determine the residual of the heavy metalions concentration.Results and DiscussionResults of scolecite were shown in Tables 1 and 2, the chemicalcomposition of the natural zeolite as oxides. SiO2 and AL2O3 percentagewere found high in sample. This indicates that silicate and aluminateare important components in natural zeolites. Percentages of metaloxides (Fe2O3 , CaO , MgO , Na2O , K2O) were found (32.31%) andthis indicates that all cations were exchanged by Na ions to formsodium zeolite as cation exchanger. The exchange of multivalent metalCountsions can be achieved in low pH to ensure the solubility of heavy metalcations according to Blanchard [11]. Characteristics of Scolecite weredrown in Figures 1-3. The identification of the zeolite was carried byX-Ray diffract meter (XRD), system: Philips, Model: X-pert PRO stressXRD analyzer Cu-target radiation, used in the present work phaseanalysis was achieved by using XRD, sample was analyzed and foundto be scolecite Figure 1. SEM photograph of zeolite particles is shownin Figure 2. It is clear that particles are rectangular in shape with sharpedges. In the infrared spectrum shown in Figure 3 of Scolecite withoutchemical processing but grinding as powder. It is reported the followingpositions of these bands: 462.88 cm-1 bending [O-Si(Al) O Si-O-Al],1029.9288 cm-1 stretching [Si(Al) O], 1645.17cm-1 [O-O] bond of watermolecules bending (OH), and around 3423.41 cm-1 region stretching(OH).Results of industrial wastewater: Samples were shown in Table3. Physiochemical properties of industrial wastewater samples weredrown in (Figure 4), Indicates pH for tannery wastewater (3.56), andpH for paints wastewater (8.40). In comparison the Arab IndustrialDevelopment and Mining Organization (AIDMO) standards (May2001) where pH range [6-9], tannery wastewater is acidic, and paintswastewater is acceptable.In comparison the AIDMO standards where the concentrationsof total dissolved solids (TDS) does not exceed (1200 ppm), tannerywastewater (32100 ppm) has a very high value, where electricitywastewater (435 ppm) has acceptable value. This explains the highconductivity of tannery wastewater (53.100 µs/cm).In comparison the AIDMO standards for biological oxygendemand BOD (30 ppm), tannery wastewater has a high value (53.34ppm), while and paints wastewater is acceptable (7.5 ppm). Chemicaloxygen demand (COD) in tannery wastewater (3000 ppm), andpetroleum wastewater (112 ppm) are high in comparison the AIDMOstandards (10 ppm). Total hardness in tannery wastewater is 1012.78ppm, but it is much lower in petroleum wastewater (34.56 ppm). Highconcentrations of heavy metal ions were shown in Table 4. Thus it isconcluded that tannery wastewater has many pollutants dischargeddirectly without treatment to the river. Removals of heavy metals byscolecite were drowning in used SPSS IBM version 20 were shown inD.Shefaa2600400200010203040506070Position [ 2Theta] (Copper (Cu))Figure 1: XRD Patterns for scolecite zeolite.J Environ Anal ToxicolISSN: 2161-0525 JEAT, an open access journalVolume 5 Issue 5 1000302

Citation: Almalih MA, Salih A, Dafaallah AA, Magid SAA, Gizouli AME, et al. (2015) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater byScolecite. J Environ Anal Toxicol 5: 302. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Page 3 of 5CharacteristicSourcesPhysical propertiesColorDomestic and industrial wastes, natural decay of organicmaterials.SolidsDomestic water supply, domestic and industrial wastes,soil erosion, inflow, and infiltration.Chemical constituentsHeavy metalsIndustrial wastes.pHDomestic, commercial, and industrial wastes.NitrogenDomestic and agriculture wastes.Domestic water supply, domestic, commercial andindustrial wastes.SulfurMethaneDecomposition of domestic wastes.Domestic wastes, surface water infiltration, treatmentplants.ArchaebacteriaFigure 2: Show SEM image for scolecite.Table 1: Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of wastewater and theirsources [10].Component (%)Scolecite O2.59K2O1.75SO30.00Cl0.114LOI11.12Table 2: Chemical composition of scolecite by XRF.WasteFigure 3: I.R for tswastewaterpH3.568.407.588.04Conductivity53100 µs/cm299 µs/cm9500 µs/cm544 µs/cmTDS32100 ppm1807 ppm5710 ppm435 ppmBOD53.34 ppm7.5 ppm9.65 ppm27.7 ppmWaterElectricitywastewatertestCOD3000 ppm1600 ppm112 ppm250 ppmTotal hardness1012.78 ppm184.79 ppm34.56 ppm74 ppmTable 3: Physiochemical properties for industrial wastewater.WastewaterHeavy leumwastewaterppmElectricitywastewaterppmNi2 20.04.02.250.923Pb2 1.263.673.894.8822 Zn1.230.0950.0030.00Cd2 1.785Fe3 Figure 4: Show physiochemical properties results of industrial wastewater.J Environ Anal ToxicolISSN: 2161-0525 JEAT, an open access journalCr3 Table 4: Concentrations of heavy metal ions in industrial wastewater by AASVolume 5 Issue 5 1000302

Citation: Almalih MA, Salih A, Dafaallah AA, Magid SAA, Gizouli AME, et al. (2015) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater byScolecite. J Environ Anal Toxicol 5: 302. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Page 4 of 5Table 5. Scolecite removed 95.8, 88.1, 48, 50, 19.7 and 99.9% of Ni2 , Pb2 ,Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 and Cr3 metal concentrations respectively. Accordingto the percentage removal values, the selectivity sequence of studiedmetals by scolecite can be given as Cr3 Ni2 Pb2 Cd2 Zn2 Fe3 (Figure 5). These results show that scolecite hold great potential toremove cationic heavy metal species from industrial wastewater.ConclusionIn the present study, we characterized industrial wastewatereffluents, results indicated that many toxic pollutants drained directlyto river and affected dangerously to environment. Scolecite naturalzeolite is capable of removing metal ions Ni2 , Pb2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 ,Cr3 from industrial waste water samples. The percentage of removalheavy metal ions by scolecite 95.8, 88.1, 48, 50, 19.7 and 99.9% ofNi2 , Pb2 , Zn2 , Cd2 , Fe3 and Cr3 . The obtained results showed thatnatural zeolite can be used effectively for the removal of these metalions from industrial wastewater. This naturally occurring materialprovides a substitute for the use of other materials as adsorbent due toits availability and its low cost.% Lead Removal% Nickel Removal% Lead Removal% Nickel Removal% Zinc Removal% Zinc Removal% Cadmium Removal% Cadmium Removal% Chromium Removal% lron Removal% lron Removal% Chromium RemovalFigures 5: Six heavy metals removal by scolecite.J Environ Anal ToxicolISSN: 2161-0525 JEAT, an open access journalVolume 5 Issue 5 1000302

Citation: Almalih MA, Salih A, Dafaallah AA, Magid SAA, Gizouli AME, et al. (2015) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater byScolecite. J Environ Anal Toxicol 5: 302. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000302Page 5 of 5Heavy metal ionssampleMeanStd. DeviationNNi2 .9.1Pb2 Zn2 Cd2 Fe3 Cr3 6.516747.48026Total63.412542.5116244. Ouki SK, Kavannagh M (1999) Treatment of metal-contaminated Wastewatersby use of natural zeolites. Water Sci Technol 39: 115-122.5. Misaelides P, Godelitsas A, Noli F, Kossionidis S (1998) 12C-RBS investigationof scolecite crystals interacted with Cs- and Sr-aqueous solutions. Nucl InstrumMethods Phys Res Sect B 139: 249-252.6. Jacobs PH, Forstner U (1999) Concept of sub aqueous capping of contaminatedsediments with active barrier systems (ABS) using natural and modifiedzeolites. Wat Res 33: 2083-2087.7. Carvalho WA, Bosco SMD, Jimenez RS (2005) Removal of toxic metals fromwastewater by Brazilian natural scolecite. J Colloid Interface Sci 281: 424-431.8. Arceiala SJ, Asolekar SR (2007) Wastewater Treatment for Pollution Controland Reuse (3rdedn), New Delhi: Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing CompanyLimited.9. Metcalf, Eddy (1998) Wastewater Engineering Treatment. Disposal. Reuse(3rdedn), New Delhi: Tata Mc.Graw- Hill Publishing Company ltd. Pp. 48-68.10. Kesraoui-Ouki S, Cheeseman CR, Perry R (1994) Natural Zeolite utilization inpollution control: A review to applications to metal effluents. J Chem TechnolBiotechnol 59: 121-126.11. Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G (1984) Removal of heavy metals fromwater by means of natural zeolites. Water Res 18:1501-1507.Table 5: Descriptive statistics of scolecite - Dependent variable: % removal.References1. Dwight JD, Brian M, Eugene EF, Abraham R, Skinner H, et al. (1997) Dana’sNew Mineralogy. (8thedn), Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.2. Pansini M (1996) Natural zeolites as cation exchangers for Environmentalprotection. Miner Deposita 31: 563-575.3. Zamzow MJ, Eichbaum BR, Sandgreen KR, Shanks DE (1990) Removalof heavy metals and other cations from wastewater using zeolites. Sep SciTechnol 25: 1555-1569.J Environ Anal ToxicolISSN: 2161-0525 JEAT, an open access journalVolume 5 Issue 5 1000302

concentrations of heavy metal ions from industrial wastewater samples, adjusted to decrease (pH) with Nitric acid. Then was added 50 mL industrial wastewater which had six heavy metal ions (Ni. 2 , Pb , Zn , Cd. 2 , Fe. 3 , and Cr. 3 ) To facilitate extraction of the heavy metal ions. Stirring: vigorous shaking was applied for 10 min as contact .

Related Documents:

spectroscopy were used to determine the concentration of these ions.The obtained results reveal that the percent adsorption for removal of most ions at (pH 6.7, particle size less than 38 µm, and 3 min retention time) was approximately 90%. Keywords: cellulose acetate,heavy metal, column tech, ions removal, adsorption. 1. INTRODUCTION

applied by metal finishing industries from several decades. In this process, metal ions from dilute solutions are exchanged with ions held by electrostatic forces on the exchange resin. The disadvantages include, high cost and partial removal of certain ions. For large quantities of competing mono and divalent ions Na (I) and Ca (II),

used. The mechanism of heavy metal removal by pre-cipitation of metal hydroxides is shown in Eq. 1: M2þ þ 2OHðÞ MOHðÞ 2 ð1Þ where M2 and OH represent the dissolved metal ions and the precipitant, respectively, while M(OH) 2 is the insoluble metal hydroxide (Wang et al. 2004). For the precipitation of heavy metals from the solu-

being used to remove heavy metal ions include chemical precipi-tation, ion-exchange, adsorption, membrane filtration, electro-chemical treatment technologies, etc. The present review article deals with the current techniques for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Their advantages and limitations in appli-cation are also evaluated.

Cd2 and Fe3 ions, effect of pH of the solution during the removal of these metallic ions. Two isotherms were tested (Langmuir, Freundlich) to determine which isotherm the adsorption processes will follow. Kinetic experiments were studied to determine the effect of time on the metal ions removal process. Finally, the removal percentages

might also be capable of metal binding. Alfalfa may be a potential source of bioma-terial for the removal of heavy metal ions from water. Alfalfa has been found growing in fields irrigated with water high in heavy metal contamination [21, 22]. Studies have shown that alfalfa has tolerance levels to heavy metals above other plants [23-26].

Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Lignocellulosic Fibers Beom-Goo Lee Roger M. Rowell ABSTRACT. Spruce, coconut coir, sugarcane bagasse, kenaf bast, kenaf core, and cotton were tested for their ability to remove copper, nickel and zinc ions from aqueous-solutions as a function of their lignin content. The

Scope and Sequence for Grade 2- English Language Arts 8/6/14 5 ELA Power Standards Reading Literature and Reading Informational Text: RL 2.1, 2.10 and RI 2.1, 2.10 apply to all Units RI 2.2: Identify the main topic of a multi-paragraph text as well as the focus of specific paragraphs within the text.