Winning In The Aftermarket - The Fishman-Davidson Center

3y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
771.10 KB
11 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Joao Adcock
Transcription

TOOL KITCompanies realize the importance of providing spareparts and after-sales services, but most could make farmore money in the aftermarket than they do. Here’s how.Winning in theAftermarketTMARTIN O’NEILLhis is the golden age of services,and to survive and prosper, we’retold, every company must transformitself into a services business. Executives swear by that services-centric viewof the world, but privately, they admitto one niggling concern: Most companies either don’t know how or don’tcare to provide after-sales services effectively. Top managements the worldover treat aftermarket services as a mereafterthought.But ignoring the promise of aftersales services is imprudent, to say theleast. Since the early 1990s, companiesin North America, Western Europe, andJapan have stopped pushing productsand started delivering the value thatcustomers get out of using those products. They changed tack because demand slowed, competition intensified,may 2006and profit margins imploded. As businesses began offering solutions insteadof products, it became evident that selling spare parts and after-sales services –conducting repairs; installing upgrades;reconditioning equipment; carrying outinspections and day-to-day maintenance;offering technical support, consulting,and training; and arranging finances –could be a bountiful source of revenuesand profits as well.How bountiful? In industries such asautomobiles, white goods, industrial machinery, and information technology,companies have sold so many units overthe years that their aftermarkets havebecome four to five times larger thanthe original equipment businesses. Although there are few reliable estimates,research firm Aberdeen Group pegsthe sale of spare parts and after-sales129YEL MAG CYAN BLACKby Morris A. Cohen, Narendra Agrawal,and Vipul Agrawal

T O O L K I T Wi n n i n g i n t h e A f t e r m a r ke tservices in the United States at 8% ofannual gross domestic product. Thatmeans American businesses and consumers spend approximately 1 trillionevery year on assets they already own.It also means that the U.S. aftermarketis bigger than all but the world’s eightlargest economies. No wonder executives at the Wharton-Stanford ServiceSupply Chain Thought Leaders Forumin October 2004 said that their firmsgenerate between 29% and 50% of theirrevenues by servicing products.After-sales services are a high-marginbusiness, and they account for a largechunk of corporate profits. Accordingto a 1999 AMR Research report, businesses earn 45% of gross profits from theaftermarket, although it accounts foronly 24% of revenues. An Accenturestudy, for instance, reveals that GMearned relatively more profits from 9 billion in after-sales revenues in 2001than it did from 150 billion of incomefrom car sales. Wall Street tracks companies’ aftermarket prowess, and studiesshow that there’s a direct correlationbetween stock prices and the qualityof firms’ after-sales services. Corporations such as ABB, Caterpillar, GE, andSaturn have won customers’ undyingloyalty by providing top after-sales services. In fact, one number that tells acompany how loyal its customers arelikely to be is how high they rate thefirm’s after-sales services.Despite the aftermarket’s obviouscharms, however, most organizationssquander its potential. They perceiveafter-sales services to be a necessaryevil and behave as though big businessto-business service contracts, smallbusiness-to-consumer warranties, andeverything in between were–like taxes–a needless expense. That’s mainly because after-sales support is notoriouslydifficult to manage, and only companiesthat provide services efficiently canmake money from them. It’s shockingto see how poorly large companies manage service networks, which the production and sales functions treat as stepchildren. Some years ago when we studiedthe after-sales network of one of America’s biggest automobile manufacturers,we found little coordination betweenthe company’s spare-parts warehousesand its dealers. Roughly 50% of consumers with problems faced unnecessarydelays in getting vehicles repaired because dealers didn’t have the right partsto fix them.Although original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) carry, on average, 10%of annual sales as spares, most don’t getthe best out of those assets. People andfacilities are often idle, inventory turnsAmerican businessesand consumers spendapproximately 1 trillionevery year on assetsthey already own.of just one to two times annually arecommon, and a whopping 23% of partsbecome obsolete every year. Some OEMsare content to let independent serviceproviders cater to customers. Indeed,third-party vendors have become soprice competitive that OEMs lose mostof the aftermarket the moment theinitial warranty period ends.Customers don’t expect products tobe perfect, but they do expect manufacturers to fix things quickly when theybreak down. Not surprisingly, customersare usually unhappy with the quality ofafter-sales support. In 1997, when weconducted the first ever study on thelinks between after-sales services andcustomer satisfaction, we found that satisfaction levels were between 10% and15% below customers’ expectations. Thedivergence would probably be highertoday, since customer expectations haveshot up over the years. In the 1980s, forinstance, semiconductor manufacturerswere content with a two-day responsetime if equipment failed; today, theyexpect suppliers to respond to requestsfor help within 15 minutes. In fact, somenewcomers have even managed to topple incumbents by providing betterafter-sales services. In the automobileindustry, for example, there’s a distinctcorrelation between the quality of aftersales service and customer intent to repurchase. Brands like Lexus and Saturninspire repeat purchases by providingsuperior service, and, consequently,they have overtaken well-establishedrivals like Ford and Chrysler.Companies can benefit in severalstrategic ways by focusing on after-salesservices. Providing support generates alow-risk revenue stream over a long period of time. Aircraft manufacturers, forinstance, can reap additional revenuesfor as long as 25 years after a sale. Thelonger the life of the asset, the more opportunities companies will find downthe line. Also, increasing sales of partsand service-related products costs businesses far less than finding new customers, though they can successfully crosssell and up sell only if the support theyoffer satisfies existing customers. Aftersales services can be a source of differentiation as well. Companies’ use ofcontract manufacturers and the development of global manufacturing standards have led to the homogenizationof products. Being on par with your rivals in performance, price, and qualitygets you into the game; after-sales services can win you the game. Finally,when businesses provide aftermarketsupport, they gain a deep understandingof customers’ technologies, processes,and plans – knowledge that rivals can’teasily acquire. That provides companieswith an unlikely, but sustainable, competitive advantage.Morris A. Cohen (cohen@wharton.upenn.edu) is the Panasonic Professor of Manufacturing and Logistics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and a cofounder and the chairman of MCA Solutions, an after-sales services supply chain software company based in Philadelphia. Narendra Agrawal (nagrawal@scu.edu) is an associate professor of operations management at theLeavey School of Business at Santa Clara University in California. Vipul Agrawal (vipul.agrawal@mcasolutions.com) is a cofounderand the executive vice president of products at MCA Solutions.130harvard business review

Tackling AftermarketChallengesIt isn’t surprising, though, that companies find it tough to compete in the aftermarket. Across industries, deliveringafter-sales services is more complex thanmanufacturing products. When delivering service products, executives have todeploy parts, people, and equipment atmore locations than they do to makeproducts. An after-sales network has tosupport all the goods a company hassold in the past as well as those it currently makes. Each generation has different parts and vendors, so the servicenetwork often has to cope with 20 timesthe number of SKUs that the manufacturing function deals with. Businessesalso have to train service personnel,who are dispersed all over the world, ina variety of technical skills. Moreover,after-sales networks operate in an unpredictable and inconsistent marketplace because demands for repairs cropup unexpectedly and sporadically. Ontop of that, companies have to handle –may 2006in an environmentally safe fashion –the return, repair, and disposal of failedcomponents.Most businesses don’t appreciate thosemyriad challenges. They blindly applyenterprise-resource-planning thinking,processes, and software solutions totackle the complexity of support networks. In our experience, that doesn’tdeliver results; the processes and toolsthat companies use to manufacturegoods in a cost-effective manner don’twork well in the support business.Here’s a simple example. In manufacturing, a quantity and a due date represent a forecast, and the manager’s goalis to schedule deliveries so that materials are available just in time. In aftersales support, forecasts for spare partsappear only as probability distributionsbecause breakdowns occur unexpectedly. Executives have to draw up forecasts that can help mitigate risk – notschedules that match forecasts. Mostcompanies don’t realize that distinction,and they use a deterministic approachwhen predicting demand. As a result,companies face mismatches betweensupply and demand, deliver poor service to customers, and leave profits behind on the table.We’ve been studying after-sales service networks for more than two decades. We’ve worked with giants suchas Boeing, Cisco Systems, IBM, KLATencor, and Tellabs to help them improve the quality of the services theyoffer customers and to increase theirfinancial returns from the businesses.Our research shows that to win in theaftermarket, executives need to recognize that after-sales services are a commitment companies make to respondwithin a specific time frame to the customer’s need for support. That definition has three important managerialimplications.First, companies must approach thepromises they make as products thatthey design, price, produce, and deliverto customers in order to generate revenues. Many businesses don’t understand131YEL MAG CYAN BLACKWi n n i n g i n t h e A f t e r m a r ke t T O O L K I T

T O O L K I T Wi n n i n g i n t h e A f t e r m a r ke tthat fundamental idea. For example,executives and engineers at an American semiconductor equipment manufacturer believed until recently that reliability was a core characteristic ofproducts and that they were obligedto help customers get the best out oftheir machines. Therefore, they offeredcustomers free after-sales services. Onlywhen the company’s costs shot throughthe roof did top management becomeaware of the strategy’s shortcomings. Thefirm almost went broke before it startedcharging customers who, incidentally,were happy to pay for post-sale services.Remember that service products, likeinsurance policies, have well-definedterms that entitle the customer to benefits under specific conditions.Second, companies must design aportfolio of service products. Differentcustomers have different service needseven though they may own the sameproduct. For example, when a mainframe computer in a stock exchangefails, the financial impact will be moresevere than when a mainframe in a library goes down, so the supplier has tooffer different kinds of services to thetwo customers. Service needs also varyat different times. A grounded aircraftmeans more to the U.S. Air Force duringa war than it does during the courseof a training exercise. OEMs must studycustomers’ needs, create products thatsatisfy different segments, and pricethem according to customers’ willingness to pay.In addition, executives need to designservice products based on customerfocused metrics such as machine uptime–not on internally focused metricsneers, call center staff, depot and warehouse staff, and transportation staff),and infrastructure (for materials movement and storage, repair, transportation, information systems, and communications). Services supply chains andmanufacturing supply chains both consist of entities and assets linked by theflow of materials, information, andmoney, but they differ in many ways.The services supply chain has to handlemore SKUs than the manufacturingDespite the aftermarket's obvious charms,most organizations squander its potential.such as the part-fill rate, which is theyardstick that most companies use.The level of demand that can be fulfilled through parts at the manufacturer’s warehouse has no meaning tothe customer if her product hasn’t beenrepaired.Third, companies should visualize adistinctive after-sales services supplychain that delivers service products tocustomers through a network of resources: materials (parts), people (engi-supply chain; deliver people, parts, andinfrastructure rather than just raw materials or finished products; and contendwith reverse flows of failed parts. (Seethe exhibit “Two Chains Compared.”)Still, the surface similarities betweenthe two drive management decisions,and that creates inefficient after-salesservices supply chains.Our studies suggest that one crucialdistinction between the two kinds ofsupply chains should differentiate theTwo ChainsComparedparametermanufacturingsupply chainafter-sales servicessupply chainNature of demandPredictable, can be forecastAlways unpredictable, sporadicCompanies neglect after-Required responseStandard, can be scheduledASAP (same day or next day)Number of SKUsLimited15 to 20 times moreProduct portfolioLargely homogeneousAlways heterogeneousDelivery networkDepends on nature ofproduct; multiple networksnecessarySingle network, capableof delivering differentservice productsInventorymanagement aimMaximize velocityof resourcesPre-position resourcesReverse logisticsDoesn’t handleHandles return, repair, anddisposal of failed componentsPerformance metricFill rateProduct availability (uptime)sales services supply chainsbecause they’re tougher tomanage than manufacturing supply chains. Theirperformance suffers bycomparison, too.Inventory turns(The more the better)132Six to 50 a yearOne to four a yearharvard business review

Wi n n i n g i n t h e A f t e r m a r ke t T O O L K I Tmay 2006Six Steps for Managing Service NetworksCompanies should use a systematic approach to improve after-salesservice quality levels, reduce investments in service assets, and cutoperating costs.123Identify which products to cover.Support all, some, complementary, or competing products.45Modify after-sales organizational structures.Provide visibility, incentives, and focus for services.6Monitor performance continuously.Evaluate against benchmarks and customer feedback.Create a portfolio of service products.Position service products according to response times and prices.Select business models to support service products.Use different models for different products and life cycle stages.Design and manage an after-sales services supply chain.Decide location of resources, prioritize resource utilization,and plan for contingencies.have stopped manufacturing. Somebusinesses choose to service complementary products as well as their own.Others may support competing products in addition to their own to generateeconomies of scale from the servicetechnologies they’ve developed. ABB,for instance, supports all the processcontrol equipment in factories that haveinstalled its automation systems, thereby providing a one-stop service solutionto customers.Before companies decide to provideservice for products they don’t manufacture, though, they must determinewhether they can generate synergies inthe process. They must ask themselves:Do the assets and skills that we wouldneed to service all those products haveanything in common? Do customersreally want a one-stop service provider?How critical is support to retaining customers? Will we dilute our brand if weservice rival products? Toyota, for example, wouldn’t want to be caught servicing Ford trucks. If there aren’t manysynergies across the products they wantto support, businesses should serviceonly the products they make. Firmsshould be warned that few companieshave made money by becoming onestop service providers.Design a portfolio of service products. As we stated earlier, businessesmust design a portfolio of service products. To do that, they need to analyzethe parameters that govern after-salessupport from the customer’s viewpointas well as from their own. On the onehand, customers measure a service provider’s performance by the amount oftime it takes to restore a failed product.They have to weigh the levels of response they need against the prices theyare willing to pay. On the other hand,to respond quickly to breakdowns, manufacturers have to locate spare partsclose to customers and invest in largerstockpiles. The faster the response thatmanufacturers promise, the greatertheir costs will be. Thus, instead of segmenting customers by sales volumes,geography, or technological capabilities, companies must create a variety of133YEL MAG CYAN BLACKoperating philosophies applied to them.Companies fulfill demand for after-salesservices through physical assets such asspare parts, repair depots, and field engineers. Unlike factories, though, businesses can’t produce services in advanceof demand. They can manufacture themonly when an unpredictable event, suchas a product failure, triggers a need.Even when the event is predictable, asin the case of scheduled maintenance,the need for parts or engineers isn’t easyto forecast. Unlike in product manufacturing, companies must deploy physicalresources in advance of events to respond with the speed promised to customers, and they use up those resources when they cope with demandsfor support.Based on that dynamic, we’ve developed a new paradigm for managingservices networks. Our approach involves treating the delivery of servicesas real options; that is, companies haveto make investments to “purchase” options to deliver services to customers,and random events that occur determine how they exercise those options tofulfill demand. This framework recognizes that it isn’t enough for the servicessupply chain to react to mismatchesbetween supply and demand. Executives must plan for those frequent responses and acknowledge that the company has to manage its services networkin a dynamic fashion. When companiesimplemented our ideas, they boostedservice quality levels by 10% to 15%, reduced investments in service assets by25% to 50%, and lowered operatingcosts by 10%. That’s why we believe thatcompanies that don’t adopt the following six-step approach are doomed tomediocrity in the aftermarket. (See thesidebar “Six Steps for Managing ServiceNetworks.”)Identify the products. As a first step,companies must decide whether tosupport all the products they sell oronly some. For instance, Kodak supportsits digital cameras but not its disposables. Many PC manufacturers, such asDell and Hewlett-Packard, support allthe products they currently make butdiscontinue support for products they

T O O L K I T Wi n n i n g i n t h e A f t e r m a r ke tservice products that meet customers’needs and willingness to pay. Serviceproducts usually range from those thatare fast and expensive – platinum services, as they’re commonly known – tothose that are slow and economic–silverservices.Developing too few or too many service products reduces quality levels andprofits. Many companies provide a onesize-fits-all product, which often increases costs. A Silicon Valley–basedsemiconductor company, for instance,offered the same high level of supportto all its customers at a throwaway price.The demand for those services drainedthe company’s human resources, and ithad to bring in design e

fectively. Top managements the world overtreat aftermarket services as a mere afterthought. But ignoring the promise of after-sales services is imprudent, to say the least. Since the early 1990s, companies in North America,Western Europe,and Japan have stopped strong pushing /strong products and started delivering the value that customers get out of using .

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Chapter 1 – The Odds Of Winning The Lottery: A Primer On Playing The Lotto In this chapter you will learn: The Odds Of Winning In Powerball The Odds Of Winning InMega Millions The Odds Of Winning InWild Card 2 The Odds Of Winning InKansas Super Cash The Odds Of Winning InUK Thunderball The Odds Of Winning InTurkey Sans Topu The Odds Of Winning InTennessee Cash

aftermarket radio (if equipped). Connect the auxiliary RCA cables into the aftermarket radio (if equipped). Plug the Data cable to the data port of the aftermarket radio. Insert the Audio cable into the iDatalink 3.5 mm audio jack of the aftermarket radio. NOTE: In Pioneer radios: plug Audio cable in auxiliary input of the radio. STEP 6