Amsterdam Barcelona Berlin Brussels Copenhagen Helsinki Istanbul London .

1y ago
35 Views
2 Downloads
1.84 MB
60 Pages
Last View : 8d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aliana Wahl
Transcription

C I T I E A M S T E R DA MB A R C E LO N AI S TA N B U LLO N D O NBERLINBRUSSELSM O S C OWC O P E N H AG E NPA R I SP R AG U EVIENNABEIJINGJA K A R TAHELSINKITA L L I N NB A N G A LO R ECITY INITIATIVES forTECHNOLOGY, INNOVATIONand ENTREPRENEURSHIPH O N G KO N GNEW DELHIA resource for city leadershipJune 2015SEOULTO K YOS E AT T L ESINGAPOREJohn Gibson, Matthew Robinson and Scott CainB O S TO NTO R O N TOC H I C AG OVA N C O U V E RLO S A N G E L E SMELBOURNEN E W YO R K C I T YSYDNEYSAN FRANCISCODOHA

Innovation and entrepreneurship have an important role toplay in shaping the future of cities.High-growth companies are creating the kinds of jobs, skillsand technology needed to compete in the 21st century globaleconomy. At the same time a new wave of businesses arechanging how people interact with the city around them,through the creation of data-driven, location-aware and ondemand services.It is perhaps no surprise that city governments around theworld are starting to take action to capitalise on these trends.Through our research, we can see policymakers in cities usingan impressive range of initiatives to create the right conditionsfor talent, ideas and businesses to flourish; from ‘TechnologyHow city administrations programme themselves and thecity for innovation is little understood. It is also not alwaysclear what entrepreneurs should ask of their city hall. What ismissing is a comprehensive view of the ways in which a citygovernment can mainstream the innovation that underpinsa city. The City Initiatives for Technology, Innovation andEntrepreneurship consortium was founded to fill this gap.The businesses that can be incubated in cities can providenew jobs and economic growth, but also solve the challengesof city governments and help them run well. For a numberof cities embracing this growing sector of their economies,a positive feedback loop exists between innovation andentrepreneurship outside the city administration and goodgovernance - including both policy and delivery - within it.We went into this project confident that city governments candraw on the tools already at hand to implement a systematicand efficient approach in how innovation and entrepreneurshipare realised in the city - an approach that does not require asignificant investment. The results from CITIE bear this out:incremental adjustments in the day-to-day workings of cityOne of the most fundamental challenges of 21st centurycity governance lies in creating an environment whereentrepreneurs and businesses can thrive. As cities facestrains that include ageing populations, shifting publicservice provisions and the saturation of infrastructure,there’s never been a more vital time for innovation, nor amore difficult situation in which to make it happen.At Future Cities Catapult, we work with cities around the worldto help deliver innovation at the city scale. We know thatto achieve such results cities must share knowledge, buildsynergistic partnerships and ultimately create an ecosystemwhere businesses and people thrive. The framework proposedin the CITIE project provides a springboard from which citiescan do just that.Apprenticeships’ in London, ‘New Urban Mechanics’ in Bostonand ‘Owl Buses’ in Seoul, to innovation-friendly regulation inAmsterdam, and start-up-friendly procurement in Barcelona.CITIE aims to bring the best of this urban innovation together,both in the form of a framework that allows cities to benchmarktheir performance and through case studies that can help citieslearn from one another.Our hope is that by doing this we can enable more citiesharness the energy of innovation and entrepreneurship todrive growth and make better places to live.John GibsonDirector of Government InnovationNestaleadership can have a significant impact on the innovativecapacity of a city.Successful creation and implementation of delivery willrequire, perhaps, a city administration that acts a bit more likea start-up itself, in how it creates, experiments, prototypes andscales solutions. Through this approach, city governmentswill be in constant dialogue and interaction with the businesscommunity, leading to policy that is more experimental andmore impactful.Accenture is pleased to work with Nesta and the Future CitiesCatapult to understand how a city government can re-engineeritself to better enable innovation and entrepreneurship. Thisreport is an important resource for both city governmentsand entrepreneurs to draw on to begin or deepen theirconversation.Matthew RobinsonManaging Director of Policy ResearchAccenture Institute for High PerformanceThe framework offers powerful visualisations of urban data,which will help unlock the information cities already collectand turn it into useful tools to inform better decision making atscale. It will guide cities towards fruitful conversations abouttheir strengths and relative weaknesses, allowing them toexplore new opportunities to encourage innovation. And it willimprove their ability to create positive partnerships, allowingthem to work more closely than ever with businesses andacademia, and with other cities.Ultimately, it will enable city leaders to develop policies thathelp entrepreneurs and businesses to succeed. Because a21st century city needs the governance to make best use of its21st century innovation.Scott CainChief Business OfficerFuture Cities Catapult

CITIECITY INITIATIVES for TECHNOLOGY,INNOVATION and ENTREPRENEURSHIPEXECUTIVE SUMMARY4Section one: AN INTRODUCTION TO CITIECity Initiatives for Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship6What is CITIE?7The CITIE framework9The cities in our analysis11Section two: THE ANALYSISNine roles city governments can play to support innovation and entrepreneurship12OPENNESS1. CITY AS REGULATOR2. CITY AS ADVOCATE3. CITY AS CUSTOMER14151821INFRASTRUCTURE4. CITY AS HOST5. CITY AS INVESTOR6. CITY AS CONNECTOR24252831LEADERSHIP7. CITY AS STRATEGIST8. CITY AS DIGITAL GOVERNOR9. CITY AS DATAVORE34353841Section three: THE RESULTSOverview of performance across all policy roles44The top 5 cities45Overall performance for all 40 cities48Characteristics of each tier of performance50The traits high-performing city governments have in common52APPENDIX: The policy levers we looked for in city governments53ABOUT THE RESEARCH54ENDNOTES56

4CITIEEXECUTIVE SUMMARYCity Initiatives for Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship(CITIE) provides city policymakers with a resource to helpthem develop the policy initiatives that catalyse innovation andentrepreneurship in citiesThis report is an introduction to the CITIEframework, analysis and results for 2015.It complements the CITIE website, wheremore detail including full case studies and adiagnostic tool can be found.www.citie.orgSection one makes the case for innovationand entrepreneurship, and introduces ourapproachInnovative tech companies are attractive to cities.Not only do they produce the jobs of tomorrow,but they are increasingly perceived as a symbolof civic vitality. There is a growing feedback loopbetween entrepreneurship outside of the city hall,and innovative governance within them. As a result, agrowing number of city governments are turning theirattention to what they can do to grow this part of theireconomy.While city authorities can’t create tech communitiesor entrepreneurs, what they can do is optimise thepolicy levers that are within their control to designthe best set of conditions for innovation to flourish.CITIE aims to help city leaders around the worldunderstand how best to approach this.We researched how 40 leading cities fromaround the world are supporting innovation andentrepreneurship. We tested against a series ofmetrics that collectively answer three questions:1. How open is the city to new ideas and newbusinesses?2. How does the city optimise its infrastructure forhigh-growth businesses?3. How does the city build innovation into its ownactivities?In the course of our research we generated 1,440original data points. Each of these was derived byobserving whether, and if so how extensively, a cityhas implemented a particular policy.

5CITIESection two provides detail on the nine policyroles that are at the heart of our analysisOur analysis revolves around nine policy roles thatcity governments can adopt to support innovationand entrepreneurship. The roles are Regulator,Advocate, Customer, Host, Investor, Connector,Strategist, Digital Governor and Datavore. They aredesigned to cover the full range of a city’s operations.For each of these roles, we: Set out why it is important. Identify the specific actions we look for toindicate good practice. Show how each city performs. Describe examples of good practice, andextracts of the detailed case studies that can befound at www.citie.org. This case study materialis designed to highlight what good practice lookslike globally so that other cities can learn from it.Section three gives an overview of the resultsfor 2015, and draws out some lessons from topperforming citiesWe have assessed 40 cities against our framework.The purpose of doing this is to help them identifytheir relative areas of strength and weakness in orderto guide policymaking efforts.We have clustered our 40 cities into four tiers ofperformance: ‘Front Runners’, ‘Challengers’, ‘Builders’and ‘Experimenters’. This is to provide each citywith a group of comparable peers that they canbenchmark themselves against and learn from.We have also highlighted the five cities that we currentlythink represent best practice globally for 2015:1. New York City2. London3. Helsinki4. Barcelona5. AmsterdamAlthough the cities in this leading group tend toperform consistently well across our indicators, thereare also marked variations in the approaches thatthey take.Our analysis of 40 cities globally shows a richdiversity of approaches to catalysing innovation andentrepreneurship. This kind of diversity is apparentacross all 40 cities. There is no single pathway tosuccess. Nevertheless, there are certain things thathigh-performing city governments share:1. They make sure that very different areas ofpolicy need to work in concert.Good policy in one area can be undermined bybad policy in another. As a result, they tend tohave teams, individuals or strategies in placewho champion innovation across departmentalsiloes.2. They are open by default.They recognise that the kind of knowledge andideas needed to drive change are unlikely toreside entirely within the city hall. As a result,they habitually find ways to work with outsidersin solving urban problems.3. They employ styles of working that aremore closely associated with start-ups thanbureaucrats.They are happy to try things out and not afraidto fail. And they are increasingly delivering agileprojects, prototyping, deploying user-led designand developing digital services. As a result, theyare able to move quickly as the world changesaround them.

6CITIESection one: An introduction to CITIE:CITY INITIATIVES for TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATIONand ENTREPRENEURSHIPWhy this is important for city leadersInnovation is disproportionately driven byyoung, technology-intensive companies.1A new breed of companies are reshaping theway people interact with the city around themOver the past few years these new businesses aremoving from suburban research parks to urbancommunities integrated into the heart of the city.2Companies like Uber, Airbnb, Citymapper, Deliverooand JustPark are bridging the digital and the physicalwith location-aware and on-demand services thatcreate new ways for citizens to experience their city.They bring with them considerable benefits to cities.High-growth companies create jobsGrowth is disproportionately driven by young, highgrowth companies. Between 2002 and 2008, forexample, just 6% of high-growth companies created50% of the UK’s employment growth.3Vibrant tech sectors are often the epicentre for newgrowth. New York City’s tech sector directly created45,000 jobs between 2003 and 2013 – 6% higherthan the employment growth rate in New York Cityand 14% higher than the national average.4These are the jobs of tomorrowNot only are these jobs numerous, they are also thejobs of tomorrow. With recent research predicting thatup around 47% of U.S. jobs are at risk of automation,innovative high-growth companies are creating theskills and ideas that cities will need to compete in anincreasingly digital global economy.5There is a growing feedback loop betweenentrepreneurship outside city halls, andinnovative governance within themWhereas city administrations were once relativelyclosed and insular environments, leading citiesare now looking to engage with outside ideas andinnovators to improve services and create newsolutions to complex problems. Individuals andteams within cities are also starting to adopt workingpractices more typically associated with start-upsthan bureaucrats.Tech companies are startingto build services that connectthe physical and digital worlds.It is natural that cities arethe focal point for this kind ofinnovation, which in turn addsto the richness of the urbanexperience. New possibilities arebeing created in terms of whereto stay, how to get around, whatto eat or where to go.Greg MarshCo-founder and CEOonefinestayIt is clear that many cities recognise theimportance of innovation and entrepreneurshipBy looking across 40 cities from around the world,we can observe a growing range of policy initiativesbeing employed by city governments to fosterentrepreneurship both in the private sector as well asinnovation in the way the city delivers services.These efforts have yet to be brought together andanalysed in a systematic way, leaving an importantknowledge gap. We developed CITIE to fill this gap.

7CITIEWhat is C I T I E ?City Initiatives for Technology, Innovationand Entrepreneurship (CITIE) is the productof a partnership between Nesta, Accenture andthe Future Cities Catapult.CITIE provides city policymakers with a resourceto support the development of policy initiatives tocatalyse innovation and entrepreneurship in cities.CITIE comprises four main components:1. A framework for understanding how policy innine key areas at the city level can be used tosupport innovation and entrepreneurship.2. A diagnostic tool that allows cities to understandhow they perform against this framework relativeto 40 global cities.3. A range of examples and case studies that shinea light on best practice from around the world.4. The results and analysis for 2015.CITIE is designed to be used by policymakers incities. To the greatest extent possible, it focuseson those policy levers that city governments haveat their disposal, although this inevitably varies fromplace to place.Explore our framework, diagnostic tool and casestudies with city leaders further at: www.citie.org.When people ask whatcountries can do to fosterinnovation, they’re asking thewrong question. It’s reallyabout what cities can do. Somecities across Europe, the US andbeyond have become hotbedsfor entrepreneurship, withinnovative start-ups driving thegrowth of their economies andserving their inhabitants.Neil RimerCo-founder and partnerIndex VenturesFigure 1: CITIE resourcesCITIE FRAMEWORKDIAGNOSTIC TOOLCASE STUDIESAn assessment of 40 globalcities against a frameworkof policy levers city governmentscan use to support innovationand entrepreneurshipAn online tool to allowcity governments toexplore their performanceand assess how theycompare with their peersA series of case studiesfor cities to learn aboutglobal best practice

CITIEFigure 2: The CITIE FrameworkDREGULATORRDVPOCHIARSATAT E G I SC USTOMTSLEAESDEENNTAEPEDIGIVOROL ROPENNESSHow open is the city to new ideasand businesses?INFRASTRUCTUREHow does the city optimise itsinfrastructure for high-growthnew businesses?LEADERSHIPHow does the city build innovation into itsown activities?R E G U L ATO RHow does the city regulate businessmodels in a way that allows fordisruptive entry?HOSTHow does the city use space to createopportunities for high-growthcompanies?S T R AT E G I S THas the city set a clear direction andbuilt the internal capability requiredto support innovation?A DVO C AT EHow does the city promote itself as aninnovative hub and its new businesscommunity to the outside world?I N V E S TO RHow does the city invest in the skillsand businesses required forinnovation?D I G I TA L G OV E R N O RHow does the city use digital channelsto foster high-quality, low-frictionengagement with citizens?C U S TO M E RIs procurement accessible to smallbusinesses, and does it activelyseek out innovation?C O N N E C TO RHow does the city facilitatephysical and digital connectivity?DATAVO R EHow does the city use data to optimiseservices and provide the raw materialfor innovation?

9CITIEThe C I T I E frameworkAn overview of the frameworkThe CITIE framework provides a resource for citypolicymakers who want to develop policy to supportinnovation and entrepreneurship (Figure 2).It was developed by combining extensiveconsultation with city government leaders, policyexperts, venture capitalists and entrepreneurs withdetailed research into the state of the art in policyfrom cities around the world.There are three levels to our analysis, illustrated inFigure 3:1. Policy dimensions: overarching questionsabout how a city supports innovation andentrepreneurshipOn the basis of this research, we identified that theapproach a city government takes to innovationand entrepreneurship can be characterised by theanswers to the following three questions:OPENNESSa. How open is the city to new ideas andbusinesses?High-performing city governments supportinsurgent businesses by ensuring thatregulations, procurement rules and advocacyefforts work in their favour.INFRASTRUCTUREb. How does the city optimise its infrastructure forhigh-growth businesses?High-performing city governments invest in theirtransport and digital infrastructure, and supportaccess to inputs such as talent and capital thathigh-growth businesses need to thrive.LEADERSHIPc. How does the city build innovation into its ownactivities?High-performing city governments lead byexample, by taking a clear view on how theywant to support innovation, and then using dataand engaging with citizens to do so.2. Policy roles: the nine roles that citygovernments can play to support innovationand entrepreneurshipIn order to answer these questions, we designeda framework that identifies nine different rolesthat a city can play to support innovation andentrepreneurship.City governments can increase their opennessto new ideas and businesses through their rolesas Regulator, Advocate and Customer. Theycan optimise the enabling infrastructure for highgrowth businesses in their roles as Host, Investorand Connector. And they can lead from within thecity hall through their roles as Strategist, DigitalGovernor and Datavore.These nine roles are the focal point of CITIE, andeach is described in detail in the rest of this report.3. Policy levers: the specific policy initiatives weuse to measure how well cities perform theserolesWe tested how well 40 leading city governmentsperform each of these roles by measuring a seriesof policy levers.These levers were chosen to represent bestpractice from around the world. In many cases,they are measures that can be quick to implement,allowing policymakers opportunities for promptaction. The levers are detailed in each section andare set out in full at Appendix 1.City governments must beopen to new ideas that challengethe status quo and help stimulateinnovation locally to competeglobally.Josep M. PiquéCEOOffice of Economic GrowthBarcelona City Council

CITIETaken collectively, these three levels of analysiscomprise the CITIE framework. Figure 3 shows howthey build on top of each other.Figure 3: Constructing the CITIE frameworkDATAVO REREGULATODARRNRVEHIL GORSTADIGIDERVEHIL GOTADEDIGILEATERERSTRAT E G I SCUSTOMTSAT E G I VO OSTINVESTORINVESTOR1. POLICY DIMENSIONS2. POLICY ROLES3. POLICY LEVERSThree dimensions providean overarching narrativefor a city government’sability to influenceinnovation andentrepreneurshipNine policy roles anchorour framework andanalysis on how citygovernments cansupport innovationand entrepreneurshipA series of policy leversis used to assess theperformance ofa city againsteach policy role

11CITIEThe cities in our analysisCITIE has assessed 40 city governments from aroundthe world (Figure 4) against the policy framework.The cities were selected to provide a diverse setof insights across cities of different sizes, culturalcontexts and with different stages of maturity in thestart-up ecosystem.Figure 4: The 40 cities in our analysisHelsinkiVancouverSeattleSan FranciscoLos AngelesTorontoChicagoBostonNew York CityCopenhagen TallinnMoscowAmsterdamBerlinLondonPragueBrussels Paris ViennaBarcelonaIstanbulTel AvivBeijingSeoulTokyoDohaRiyadhDubaiNew DelhiHong KongBangaloreBogotáNairobiSão PauloSingaporeJakartaJohannesburgSydneyBuenos AiresMelbourneAmsterdamNetherlandsBuenos AiresArgentinaJakartaIndonesiaNew York sburgSouth nhagenDenmarkLondonUKPragueCzech RepublicTallinnEstoniaBeijingChinaDohaQatarLos AngelesUSARiyadhKSATel an ndMoscowRussiaSão PauloBrazilTorontoCanadaBostonUSAHong lsBelgiumIstanbulTurkeyNew DelhiIndiaSeoulSouth KoreaViennaAustria

12CITIESection two: THE ANALYSISNine roles city governments can play to supportinnovation and entrepreneurshipOur analysis revolves around nine policyroles that city governments can adoptto support innovation and entrepreneurship(Figure 2).Each is important in its own right, but taken togetherthey can create an environment that is optimised tosupport innovation and entrepreneurship.Putting the nine roles in contextBelow, we set out a few points of context that helpdescribe how the policy roles relate to one anotherand how best to interpret them.1. Some policy roles imply a direct focus onprivate sector entrepreneurship. Others aremore about innovation within city hall. Thesystem as a whole works best when these worktogetherPolicy roles such as Regulator, Customer andInvestor directly define how a city governmentengages with and supports businesses.Getting them right tends to require an explicitcommitment to prioritise entrepreneurship.Other policy roles such as Strategist, DigitalGovernor and Connector are less explicitlyfocused on entrepreneurship. Measures such aslaying fibre, digitising public services or buildingan internal innovation team serve a wider rangeof policy objectives. Nevertheless, they formimportant components of the overall businessenvironment.Entrepreneurship outside the city hall andinnovation inside it are complementary to eachother.2. The extent of control over each policy levervaries between different city governmentsWe have tried to focus on areas in which citieshave direct policy levers to work with. However,the delineation of powers between national,regional and city-level government variesconsiderably around the world.We have tried to accommodate this withinour analysis where possible. We have alsoaccounted for less direct measures that citygovernments can take when they do not haveformal powers, such as advocacy, matchmaking,educational campaigns and marketing.Increasingly, these tactics are being deployedthrough partnerships with private sector actorsand other key stakeholders in the city.3. The areas that a city government has themost direct control over do not correlateperfectly with the things that matter most toentrepreneursFor example, access to capital is crucial toentrepreneurs, indicated by the rapid growth ofthe alternative finance market, such as equitybased and reward-based crowdfunding.6 Itis therefore not surprising that we can see anumber of cities making efforts to support theseinputs, but they are rarely the principal actor inthese areas. Risk capital markets are primarilyprivate, and few city governments have directcontrol over school curriculums or the quality oflocal universities.In contrast, all city governments have controlover how they run their procurement or whatthey do with their data. These factors are veryimportant to some businesses, but less so toothers.Figure 5 sketches the relationships betweenhow important different variables are toentrepreneurs and innovators, and how muchcontrol a city has over them.

13CITIE4. The wider cultural and economic context ofa city is also important, but we have kept ouranalysis focused on the policy levers that citygovernments have at their disposalquality of bars and restaurants, all make a cityattractive. But, in general, it is difficult to holdcity governments directly to account for them, atleast in the short or medium term. As a result, wehave excluded them from our analysis.Considerations ranging from house prices, crimelevels, school quality to cultural vitality, to theFigure 5: Factors important to entrepreneurs that city governments can influenceDirect controlDigital servicesCity innovationvisionCity innovation teamand leadershipOpen dataOpen policymakingAccess to customersSmart cityanalyticsInternationalnetworksCost and availabilityof workspaceAbility of the city to influenceSupport and advocacyMobilityPartial control ingopportunitiesTalentDigitalinfrastructureAccess to capitalHouse pricesIndirect influenceover the long runQuality of lifeCultural vitalityUseful to someImportant to someImportant to the majorityImportance to entrepreneurs and innovatorsFactors included in our analysisFactors not included in our analysisThe remainder of section two gives an overview ofeach of the nine roles that city governments can play.For each of these roles, we: Set out why it is important. Identify the specific actions we look for toindicate good practice. Show how each city performs. Describe examples of good practice, andextracts of the detailed case studies that can befound at www.citie.org. This case study materialis designed to highlight what good practice lookslike globally so that other cities can learn from it.

14CITIEOPENNESSHow open is the city to new ideasand businesses?R E G U L ATO RHow does the city regulate businessmodels in a way that allows fordisruptive entry?A DVO C AT EHow does the city promote itself as aninnovative hub and its new businesscommunity to the outside world?C U S TO M E RIs procurement accessible to smallbusinesses, and does it activelyseek out innovation?

15CITIECITY AS REGULATORHow does the city regulate business models in away that allows for disruptive entry?Why this is important for city governmentsand entrepreneursRegulatory compliance is something that allbusinesses need to make sure they get right. Thiscan be particularly challenging for companiesthat bring new business models to market whichchallenge the assumptions made by regulations froma previous era.Often it is the city authority that has to determinehow these new models will be regulated, particularlyin markets that operate at a city level, such as ondemand taxi services and short lets. This is a delicatebalancing act.Digital technologies are increasingly disruptingpreviously well-defined industry boundaries, givingrise to new business models. These can create valuefor businesses and consumers alike. For example, inSan Francisco the short-term holiday rental platformAirbnb is estimated to contribute 56 million in localspending and support 430 jobs in the city.7However, such businesses often present novelchallenges for lawmakers and regulators - should aspare room be treated in the same way as a hotelroom? They can also threaten legacy businesses,which will often respond by seeking regulatoryprotection from what they perceive as unfaircompetition.High-performing city governments are finding ways toaccommodate innovative new business models intotheir local economy.This does not mean crudely deregulating markets,nor does it involve using regulation to protectincumbents. Rather, it is about taking measures tomake sure that regulations keep up to date with newideas and technologies.We used contemporary examples of disruptivebusiness models – shared lets and on-demand taxiservices – to test how well city governments do this.We assessed whether city governments:a. enforce existing regulations proportionately; andb. keep regulations up to date in response tochanges in the marketWhat we looked for in citiesENFORCE PROPORTIONATELYRESPONSE TO CHANGE1Enforce existingregulationsproportionately2Review andupdate regulationsto take account ofnew businessmodels3Engage the fullspectrum ofstakeholders tocraft balancedregulationProportional enforcementensures that old regulationsdo not block new entryover technicalities.Regulation becomesbetter able to takeaccount of pace ofchange.Engaging with allstakeholders helps toconstruct fair andbalanced regulations.

16CITIECITY AS REGULATORTIER 1How cities performedTOP PERFORMERSTIER 2TIER 3TIER 4BarcelonaBerlinBrusselsJakartaNew York CitySão gotáBuenos AiresCopenhagenDohaDubaiHelsinkiHong KongIstanbulJohannesburgLos AngelesMoscowNairobiNew DelhiParisPragueRiyadhTallinnTel kyoAmsterdamLondonSan FranciscoHow cities are acting as RegulatorIn advance of the 2020 Olympics, Tokyo has set atarget of 20 million visitors a year by 2020. And aspart of its economic growth strategy, the governmenthas designated spe

Nine roles city governments can play to support innovation and entrepreneurship 12 OPENNESS 14 1. CITY AS REGULATOR 15 2. CITY AS ADVOCATE 18 3. CITY AS CUSTOMER 21 INFRASTRUCTURE 24 4.CITY AS HOST 25 5. CITY AS INVESTOR 28 6.CITY AS CONNECTOR 31 LEADERSHIP 34 7. CITY AS STRATEGIST 35 8. CITY AS DIGITAL GOVERNOR 38 9. CITY AS DATAVORE 41 .

Related Documents:

City of Copenhagen. Copenhagen Climate Adaptation Plan: Copenhagen Carbon Neutral by 2025, Oct. 2011 . City of Copenhagen. Copenhagen Climate Projects, Annual Report, 2015. Approach to Teaching . During the course Copenhagen will be used as an ‘urban laboratory’ to study how liva

ART NOUVEAU IN BRUSSELS Brussels living Art Nouveau The first Art Nouveau house was built in Brussels in 1893. Today, Brussels still has more than 500 Art Nouveau buildings. Buildings that are always places to live in: dwellings, museums, shops, restaurants, cafés . Yes, we can still go on living Art Nouveau in Brussels! Contents

Natural Resource Management (Watershed, Forestry and Livelihoods) Wildlife Conservation An Analysis Report by CMS ENVIS Centre 1 COPENHAGEN SUMMIT COPENHAGEN SUMMIT COPENHAGEN SUMMIT COPENHAGEN SUMMIT (December 7-18, 2009) COVERAGE IN PROMINENT INDIAN NEWS CHANNELS December 24, 2009 COPENHAGEN SUMMIT

DOCTORATE REGULATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM 1 Doctorate Regulations of the University of Amsterdam Established by the Doctorate Board University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, 11 June 2020 These Doctorate Regulations are a translation of the Promotiereglement 2020 van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. In the event of any discrepancy between them .

Berlin Brussels Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link Budapest Vienna Hamburg Lübeck Copenhagen Stockholm Zürich Genoa Bologna Rome Nice Salzburg Prague Dresde n Verona Zagreb *If no Fehmarnbelt link, only to Copenhagen (see subdivision into A and B) Innsbruck Ljubljana Villach Breclav Prague Vienna Breclav Copenhagen Hanover www.bmvi.de 7 February 2020 18

netherlands stockhol m madrid * barcelona* london west end london city brussels dusseldorf cologne berlin frankfurt stuttgart luxembour g paris tallinn helsinki riga oulu vilnius malmÖ vaxjÖ oslo turku tampere jyvÄskyl Ä gothenburg copenhagen munich amsterdam hamburg rotterdam nantes lyon 7.00% 7.00% 6.75 % 6.75 % 5.00% 5.20% 7.00% 6.75% 8 .

7 City hopping: Munich - Berlin / Berlin - Prague - Vienna - Budapest 8 City hopping: Munich - Salzburg - Vienna - Budapest / Warsaw - Krakow 9 City hopping: Vienna - Salzburg - Munich - Berlin -Prague - Krakow 10 SCANDINAVIA Independent Tours: Copenhagen - Stockholm / Copenhagen - Oslo - Stockholm

ASTM C 1702 external mixing Sample 1 Sample 2 Not tested Cement, g 9.81 3.38 Water, g 4.90 1.69 Sand reference, g 37.37 12.61 Test duration, h 168 168 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Signal to noise Figure 1 shows the heat flow measured from the sample cell charged with sand that displayed the highest overall heat flow. This was taken as a measure of noise for the purpose of this study. Figure 1 .