Receiving Antenna MetricsWith ExamplesSteps Beyond Gain and F/BJukka Klemola OH6LIFeb 13th 2018
Practical Presentation is longer than typically seen onWWROFWe will have a short break at about 45 minutesAll antenna model files and the Excel WorkbookRX Ant Metrics will be availale via WWROFAs you have questions, please write themdown. Presentation is longQ&A at the end
Contributors Markku OH2RA Dan AC6LA Frank W3LPL Reino OH3MA Maik DJ2QV Ward N0AX
Contents Traditional Metrics Gmax, F/B Receiving Directivity Factor Directivity Merit Figure Noise Margin Leaking Index Receiving antennas for residential locations Better decent size antennas for rural locations Linear Inline Receiving Array
Antenna Gain Maximum
Antenna Gain Maximum
Antenna Front-to-Back
Antenna Front-to-Back16,1 dB16,1 dB
Antenna Front-to-Back
Cardioid Pattern Antenna0.5wl BOG, Flag, 2xGP
Cardioid Pattern Antenna-3 dB-3 dB-3 dB-3 dB
Cardioid Pattern Antenna-3 dB-3 dB-3 dB-3 dBFor a receiving antennaWhich is considered the 'Better' directionThe receiving sector on right orThe attenuated sector on the left?
Cardioid Pattern Antenna-6 dB or better
Cardioid Pattern Antenna-12 dB or better
Modern Metrics
Receiving Antenna RDFReceiving Directivity FactorRDF isMaximum GainAverage GainCalculated through full hemisphere
Receiving Antenna RDFReceiving Directivity FactorRDF isMaximum Gain [dB]– Average Gain [dB]Calculated through full hemisphere
Receiving Antenna RDFReceiving Directivity FactorRDF isAvailable in EZNEC, AutoEZ, 4nec2
Receiving Antenna RDFReceiving Directivity FactorRDFPrinciple introduced byJohn Devoldere, ON4UN,Low Band DXing, Chapter 7
Receiving Antenna RDFReceiving Directivity FactorRDF is3D numeric calculation
Receiving Antenna DMFDirectivity Merit FigureDMF isMaximum Gain [dB]– Back Half Average Gain [dB]Calculated through back halfhemisphere
Receiving Antenna DMFDirectivity Merit FigureDMF isIntroduced as a 3D itemJohn Devoldere, ON4UNLow Band DXing, Chapter 7
Receiving Antenna DMFDirectivity Merit FigureDMF isNot available
Receiving Antenna DMFDirectivity Merit FigureDMF isNot availableSolution release in this presentation
What are the Metrics Good For? Previously unanswered questions:Does my system hear noise from the band oram I limited by electronics thermal noise?
What are the Metrics Good For? Previously unanswered questions:Does my system hear noise from the band oram I limited by electronics thermal noise?How small my directional antenna can be andstill receive the noise from the band?
What are the Metrics Good For? Previously unanswered questions:Does my system hear noise from the band oram I limited by electronics thermal noise?How small my directional antenna can be andstill receive the noise from the band?Which antenna pattern is better?
RX Antenna Development Small antennas
RX Antenna Development Small antennas Flag, FO0AAA, DoubleKAZ, phased antennas Optimize the antenna size Solution proposal in this presentation Most antennas produce side lobes Pattern may leak despite overall average is goodSolution proposal in this presentation
RX Antenna Development New small antennas use a load to form thepattern Antenna's gain is typically negative in dBi Need to design antenna system level sensitivity Best S/N by cleanest pattern adequate amplificationTransmit antennas integrate all noise Transmit antennas' receiving S/N grows by Gmax
Antenna Metrics Development Computers bring opportunities True 3D pattern data available Idea to Need to Requirement to Specification Calculating is easy
Antenna Pattern DataSample based 3D pattern into ExcelDan, AC6LA, made an automatedinput for MMANA Table Angle / Gainand for EZNEC and 4nec2 .pf3 filesMMANA uses MININECEZNEC and 4nec2 use NEC
Antenna Pattern DataSample based 3D pattern into ExcelDan, AC6LA, made an automatedinput for MMANA Table Angle / Gainand for EZNEC and 4nec2 .pf3 filesMMANA uses MININECEZNEC and 4nec2 use NECZenith, Azimuth, Gain at 1 degreeresolutionFirst calculus to steradiansMath basics:hemisphere surface is 2 Pi
Data to MetricsSample based 3D pattern into ExcelDan, AC6LA, made an automatedinput for MMANA Table Angle / Gainand for EZNEC and 4nec2 .pf3 filesMMANA is MININEC while EZNECand 4nec2 use NEC engineMath basics:hemisphere surface is 2 PiZenith, Azimuth, Gain at 1 degreeresolutionFirst calculus to steradiansThen average gain to get RDFand back half average to get DMF
RX Ant Metrics WorkbookRead MMANA .csv File
RX Ant Metrics WorkbookRead MMANA .csv File
RX Ant Metrics WorkbookRead EZNEC or 4nec2 pf3 File
RX Ant Metrics OutputsFront sheet - Avg Gain RDF DMFRDF algorithm same as EZNECDMF available as a new item
RX Ant Metrics OutputsNoise Margin estimates if the receiving system is limited byelectronics thermal noiseThat is, if antenna's Average Gain is big enough to hear theband noise over the receiver's thermal electronics noise
RX Ant Metrics OutputsLeaking Index tells if the antenna pattern leaks outside the Main Lobe
RX Ant Metrics OutputsSummary of Metrics gives an easy to copypaste data set to acollection workbook
New Antenna Metrics Explained
Noise Margin The Sky provides noise to antenna Noise is mostly man-made or atmospheric Directional antenna receives noise bycalculated average gain in relation to fullhemisphere noiseSmaller antenna with smaller amplificationreceives less noise
Noise Margin The Sky provides noise to antenna Noise is mostly man-made or atmospheric Directional antenna receives noise bycalculated average gain in relation to fullhemisphere noiseSmaller antenna with smaller amplificationreceives less noiseTo hear the weak signals, the noise levelreceived from the Sky must exceed the noise ofelectronics, the thermal noise, by a margin
Noise Margin We can calculate the noise power we receive Thermal electronics noise equals Noise Figure We want to have a small, yet highly directiveantenna and receive the smallest possiblesignalsThat is, we want to hear the band noise at mainlobe -3dB points and have the smallest feasibleantennaWe need to understand and evaluate theantenna system Noise Margin
Noise LevelITU-R P.372-13
Noise LevelITU-R P.372-13Shows 46 dBnoise on 160 at 1Hzbandwidth for a quietrural receiving site64dB for a residentialarea receiving site
Noise LevelITU-R P.372-13Shows 46 dBnoise on 160 at 1Hzbandwidth for a quietrural receiving site64dB for a residentialarea receiving siteValidation for NoiseLevel comes from ITU
Noise LevelITU-R P.372-13Shows 46 dBnoise on 160 at 1Hzbandwidth for a quietrural receiving site64dB for a residentialarea receiving siteA B C Noise Levels arestatistical medianD is minimum noiselevel expected
Noise Distribution Noise distribution is even for dA(sr) steradiansurface elements through the hemisphereNoise Mask can be used but Excel file size growsfrom 5MB level to 8M Low angle man-made noise likely dominates0 to 2 degrees elevation gain is small, attenuatesthe low angle noise, lowers importanceLow angle emphasizing noise mask algorithmprototyping showed less than 1 dB differenceNoise Margin algorithm can be improved
Noise LevelCalculate in dB:Noise Level Antenna Gaverage
Noise Level at ConnectorCalculate in dB:Noise Level Antenna Gaverage- Feed System Losses Noise Level atantenna system outputconnector at MainLobe Gmax
Noise Level at -3dB pointsCalculate in dB:Noise Level Antenna Gaverage- Feed System Losses- 3 dB Noise Level atantenna system outputconnector atMain Lobe – 3 dBpoints
Receiver Noise FigureRX Noise FigureReceiver Noise Figurestands on the bottom,limiting the receivingsystem sensitivity
Noise MarginCalculate in dB:Noise Level Antenna Gaverage- Feed System Losses- 3 dB- RX Noise Figure Noise Margin
Noise MarginCalculate in dB:Noise Level Antenna Gaverage- Feed System Losses- 3 dB- RX Noise Figure Noise MarginNoise Margin givesroom for Noise Levelchanges
Noise Margin in RX Ant Metrics
Noise Margin in RX Ant Metrics
Leaking Index
Leaking Index Leaking Index tells how much the antennapattern leaks to unwanted directions
Leaking Index Leaking Index tells how much the antennapattern leaks to unwanted directions Default 80 to 280 degrees AzimuthThe antenna is better when Smaller proportion of pattern leaks Any leaking is attenuated moreThe percentage of leaking is calculated at threelevels; Gmax -12 dB, -18 dB and -24 dB.Leaking Index is the average percentage ofleaking at these three levels
Leaking Index
Leaking Index8028090
Leaking Index8028090
Leaking Index8028090
Leaking Index80280Three levels-12 dB-18 dB-24 dB90
Leaking Index in RX Ant Metrics
Leaking Index in RX Ant Metrics
Leaking Index Bottom Line RDF and DMF are general averagingcalculationsLeaking Index brings up only the amount ofleakingLeaking index calculates more than back halfand is configurable for narrower Main LobesLeaking Index can be the final decision makingcriteria where RDF and DMF provide uncleardifferentiation between antennas
Leaking Index Limitations Leaking index is currently limited to 0-90elevationForward looking high elevation angles are notcounted inLeaking Index drives to improve the pattern to-24 dB level, not furtherLeaking Index algorithm can be improved
Examples
Examples Various antenna examples Also a new antenna concept
Examples FO0AAA triangle / delta Beverage Twin Triangle Linear Inline targetX Antenna - LIXA Staggered beverage Linear Inline Receiving Array - LIRA
Triangle AntennaLoadIdea from Earl K6SEFeedpoint
Triangle AntennaTriangle HeightBottom Wire HeightBottom Wire LengthConstruction WidthWireLoadFeed5.5m (18'4“)3m (10')8m (26'6“)3m (10') struts/guys4mm Cu820-850 ohm800 ohmLoadFor all antennasFeedpoint
Triangle AntennaTriangle HeightBottom Wire HeightBottom Wire LengthConstruction WidthWireLoadFeed5.5m (18'4“)3m (10')8m (26'6“)3m (10') struts/guys4mm Cu820-850 ohm800 ohmEasy to install feed pointLoad placement optimized for patternLoadAlmost like FO0AAA triangle/deltaby Earl K6SEFeedpoint
Triangle Metrics
Triangle RDF, DMF
Triangle Noise Margin
Triangle Noise MarginQuiet Rural QTH
Triangle Noise MarginResidential QTH
Triangle Noise MarginResidential QTH-5.4 dB to 12.6 dB difference comes from changeto Residential from Quiet Rural
Triangle Noise MarginResidential QTH-5,4 dB to 12,6 dB difference comes from changeto Residential from Quiet RuralThat equals receiving site Noise Level change from 46 dB to 64 dB
Triangle Leaking Index
Comparison
Bigger TriangleTriangle HeightBottom Wire HeightBottom Wire LengthConstruction WidthWireLoadFeed7.5m (25')3m (10')15m (50')3m (10') struts/guys4mm Al830-850 ohm800 ohm
Bigger Triangle
ComparisonNoise Margin increased to 2.1 dB from -5,4 dB2,1 dB is not a good enough Noise Margin for theabsolute most quiet QTH
Smaller TriangleRESIDENTIALConstruction HeightBottom Wire HeightBottom Wire LengthConstruction WidthWireLoadFeed6m (20')3m (10')5m (13'4“)2m (8') struts/guys4mm Al740-760 ohm800 ohm
Smaller TriangleRESIDENTIAL
ComparisonNoise Margin shows 3,4 dB at a Residential QTHFor a 5 meters long antenna, the result is surprising
Smaller Triangle 80mRESIDENTIAL
Smaller Triangle 80mRESIDENTIAL
Comparison5 m long, 6m high Triangle antenna justabout functions in a residential area QTH
Beverage 170mTotal construction length 170m (558')Wire height 3m (10')Construction width 2m (6'7“) with strutsLoads 820-850 ohmFeed 800 ohm (0 and 180 deg)Feed 600 ohmLoad 450 ohm
Beverage 170m
Beverage 170m
Beverage 170m Leaking Index
Comparison
Beverage 250m
Beverage 250m Leaking Index
Beverage 250m
ComparisonBeverages show their power compared to the smallest antennas
Twin TriangleTotal construction length 58m (190')Bottom wires at 3m (10')Bottom wire lengths 24m (78'9“)Triangle height 9,5m (31'2“)Construction Width 3m (10')Wire 4mm AlLoads 840-860 ohmFeed 800 ohm (0 and 180 deg)
Twin Triangle
Twin Triangle RDF DMF
Twin Triangle Noise Margin
Twin Triangle Leaking Index-12 dB or better attenuation level area widerthan Leaking Indexdefault 80-280 degrees
Twin Triangle Leaking Index-12 dB or better attenuation level area widerthan Leaking Indexdefault 80-280 degrees
Twin Triangle Leaking Index-12 dB or better attenuation level area widerthan Leaking Indexdefault 80-280 degrees
ComparisonNotice !!RDF gets worseDMF stays exactly the sameLeaking Index improvesHowever, Noise Margin is too small forthe most quiet QTH
Smaller Twin TriangleRESIDENTIALTotal construction length 25m (82')Bottom wires at 3m (10')Bottom wire lengths 8m (26'3“)Triangle height 6.5m (21'4“)Construction width 3m (10')Loads 780-800 ohmFeeds 800 ohm (0 and 180 deg)
Smaller Twin TriangleRESIDENTIAL
Smaller Twin TriangleRESIDENTIAL
ComparisonNotice !!RDF worse than 250m beverageDMF 1.7 dB better than 250m beverageLeaking Index improves clearlyNoise Margin too small to ensure hearing theweakest possible signals even at Residential QTH
Smaller Twin Triangle 80mRESIDENTIAL
Smaller Twin Triangle 80mRESIDENTIAL
Smaller Twin Triangle 80mResidential QTHQuiet rural QTHTotal construction length 25m (82ft)
ComparisonSmaller Twin Triangle gives solid performance on 80,marginal on 160 at a Residential area QTHDMF and Leaking Index win over a 250m long beverage
LIXA protoLinear Inline targetX AntennaTotal construction length 22.8m (74'9“)Bottom wires at 2.4m (7' 10“)Material 4mm AluminumTriangle height 5.4m (17'8“)Construction width 3m (10')Load 800 ohmFeed 800 ohm
LIXA protoLinear Inline targetX Antenna
LIXA proto
ComparisonLIXA has a little better pattern than DHDL or Double DeltaThis prototype is dual band 160/80, under testing at OH4ANoise performance is marginal on 80, should be better on 160OH4A QTH is not the most quietAlso a dual rectangle version, feed and loads at low corners, is under testing
2x LIRALinear Inline Receiving AntennaNamed after idea generator OH2RATotal construction length 83m (272'4“)Bottom wires at 2.4m (7' 10“)Material 4mm AluminumTriangle height 8.1m (26'7“)Construction width 3m (10')Loads 920 ohmFeeds 600 ohm (180 deg phase)
2x LIRALinear Inline Receiving Antenna
2x LIRA
ComparisonNew performance levelRDF still worse than 250m beverageDMF and Leaking Index show exceptional performanceAntenna total land area 83 x 3 mNoise Margin too small for the most Quiet Rural QTH
Staggered 320m BeveragesConstruction length 360m (1181 ft)Height 3m (10')Width 100m (328')Feed 500 ohm, 90 deg phasingLoads 450 ohm
Staggered 320m Beverages
Staggered 320m Beverages
ComparisonRDF is benchmark 14.8 dBDMF dropped to 25.9 dB from 30.1 dB of 2x LIRALeaking Index increased to 15% from 4,6%2x LIRA gives a good challenge to staggered beverages of360x100m as a 83x3m land area antenna
2x LIRA in Picture2x LIRAFirst prototypeUnder testingsince Dec 2016SoutheasternFinland
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
Maximum Performance Receiving Antenna4x LIRA
ComparisonRDF is same as staggered long beverages 14.8 dBDMF increased to 37,6 dB – much better than any other antennaLeaking Index 0 %4x LIRA searches for a test locationExcellent usage for 216x3m land area
Maximizing own QTH? New tools open up new possibilities in findingthe best alternative also to residential QTHoperatorsYou do not need a big land area to improveIf you have a big land area, there is room andnow also an opportunity for improvementSet criteria, compare, choose, design, buildand Operate
Conclusion One or two numbers alone is too simplified wayto look at receiving antenna performanceNoise Margin is a new amplification metricFor pattern quality the RDF, DMF, LeakingIndex and any combination are now availableReceiving antenna metrics develop withcomputing capabilitiesFuture: optimizing based on new metrics
Thank You for Listening Questions ?Jukka OH6LIjpklemola@gmail.com
antenna system Noise Margin Noise Margin. Noise Level ITU-R P.372-13. Noise Level ITU-R P.372-13 Shows 46 dB noise on 160 at 1Hz bandwidth for a quiet rural receiving site 64dB for a residential area receiving site. Noise Level ITU-R P.372-13 Shows 46 dB noise on 160 at 1Hz
Random Length Radiator Wire Antenna 6 6. Windom Antenna 6 7. Windom Antenna - Feed with coax cable 7 8. Quarter Wavelength Vertical Antenna 7 9. Folded Marconi Tee Antenna 8 10. Zeppelin Antenna 8 11. EWE Antenna 9 12. Dipole Antenna - Balun 9 13. Multiband Dipole Antenna 10 14. Inverted-Vee Antenna 10 15. Sloping Dipole Antenna 11 16. Vertical Dipole 12 17. Delta Fed Dipole Antenna 13 18. Bow .
Random Length Radiator Wire Antenna 6 6. Windom Antenna 6 7. Windom Antenna - Feed with coax cable 7 8. Quarter Wavelength Vertical Antenna 7 9. Folded Marconi Tee Antenna 8 10. Zeppelin Antenna 8 11. EWE Antenna 9 12. Dipole Antenna - Balun 9 13. Multiband Dipole Antenna 10 14. Inverted-Vee Antenna 10 15. Sloping Dipole Antenna 11 16. Vertical Dipole 12 17. Delta Fed Dipole Antenna 13 18. Bow .
Wire-Beam Antenna for 80m. 63 Dual-Band Sloper Antenna. 64 Inverted-V Beam Antenna for 30m. 65 ZL-Special Beam Antenna for 15m. 66 Half-Sloper Antenna for 160m . 67 Two-Bands Half Sloper for 80m - 40m. 68 Linear Loaded Sloper Antenna for 160m. 69 Super-Sloper Antenna. 70 Tower Pole as a Vertical Antenna for 80m. 71 Clothesline Antenna. 72 Wire Ground-Plane Antenna. 73 Inverted Delta Loop for .
3: HR metrics ⁃ Examples of different HR metrics ⁃ HR process metrics vs. HR outcome metrics 4: HR and business outcomes ⁃ Going from HR metrics to business metrics ⁃ The difference between metrics and KPIs Course & Reading Material Assignment Module 2 Quiz 2 VALUE THROUGH DATA AND HR METRICS MODULE 2
system with one transmitting antenna and two receiving antenna at the receiving end for analysis (in this case only two, more than two also possible). Fig. 4: SIMO system. In the above diagram, S: input, Y 1 & Y 2: two outputs from two receiving antennas, X T: Transmitting antenna, Y R1 & Y R2: two receiving antenna (both the receiving
Professional Wireless HA-8089 helical antenna – 470-900MHz Sennheiser A2003 UHF W/B Antenna Sennheiser A5000CP Antenna Sennheiser AD3700 Active Antenna Shure UA830WB UHF Active Antenna Booster Shure UA860/SWB omnidirectional antenna UHF Shure UA870-WB Active Antenna Shure UA874-WB Active Antenna Shure
headliner, down the A-pillar to the instrument panel. For antenna removal, see REMOVAL . For antenna installation, see INSTALLATION . OPERATION ANTENNA BODY AND CABLE The antenna body and cable connects the antenna mast to the radio. The radio antenna is an . 2008 Jeep
Metrics for Software Testing: Managing with Facts: Part 2: Process Metrics Provided by Rex Black Consulting Services (www.rbcs-us.com) Introduction In the previous article in this series, I offered a number of general observations about metrics, illustrated with examples. We talked about the use of metrics to manage testing and quality with facts.