Annual Prison Performance Ratings Guide 2019/20 - GOV.UK
Annual Prison Performance RatingsGuide2019/20Ministry of JusticeOfficial Statistics Bulletin30 July 20201
ContentsIntroduction3Prison Performance Tool3Prison Scores5Moderation6Weights7Rules7First performance rating or change of function in year8Inclusion in the Prison Performance Tool8Prison Function10Comparator Groups11COVID-1911Worked Examples12Annex A – Performance Measure Information17Annex B – Performance Measure Rating Definitions23Annex C – Measure Weightings28Annex D – 2019/20 Prison Comparator Groups302
Guide to Annual Prison Performance RatingsIntroductionHer Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is an executive agency of the Ministryof Justice (MoJ) with the goal of helping prison and probation services work together tomanage offenders through their sentences. For 2019/20 HMPPS had responsibility fordelivering prison performance using a suite of performance measures resulting inperformance ratings for both public sector and privately managed prisons across Englandand Wales.The Annual Prison Performance Ratings are derived from the Prison Performance Tool(PPT) which was introduced in April 2018. All prison performance ratings reflect performancebetween 1st April 2019 and 31st March 2020.There is overlap between some information provided in the Annual Prison PerformanceRatings and other MoJ publications: The Safety in Custody National Statistics published quarterly by MoJ. Previous andcurrent publications can be found at -statistics.The HMPPS Annual Digest Official Statistics is published annually by MoJ. Previousand current publications can be found -and-probation-trusts-performancestatistics.Data presented in this report have been drawn from administrative IT systems. Although careis taken when processing and analysing the data, the level of detail collected is subject to theinaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system.Further information regarding data quality of individual performance measures used todetermine overall prison performance can be found in the accompanying supplementarytables to this guide.Prison Performance ToolThe prison performance framework was revised for 2019/20 to replace the one used in2018/19, to better ensure it meets Ministerial and Agency priorities. Accommodation on thefirst night following release, employment at six weeks following release and staff resignationrate were all added to the framework. Positive Random Mandatory drug testing was split intotwo measures, one excluding psychoactive substances and the other monitoringpsychoactive substances only.Prison level performance is monitored and measured using the Prison Performance Tool.The PPT uses a data-driven assessment of performance in each prison to derive overallprison performance ratings. As in previous years, data-driven ratings were ratified andsubject to in depth scrutiny at the moderation process which took place in June 2020.In the PPT, overall performance in each prison is rated on a 1 to 4 scale. The differentratings are 4: Performance is exceptional; 3: Performance is acceptable; 2: Performance isof concern and 1: Performance is of serious concern.In 2019/20, the PPT used 33 performance measures including three sub measures, split intosix domains which aim to reflect the HMPPS priorities:3
Safety;Security;Respect;Rehabilitation and Release Planning;Purposeful Activity;Organisational Effectiveness.When the initial performance framework was devised for the PPT in 2018/19, work wasundertaken jointly between MoJ and HMPPS to align the performance measures to anappropriate domain, and where appropriate linking to the expectations set by Her Majesty’sInspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). This process was repeated in 2019/20 when the newmeasures were introduced. The performance measures by domain are as follows:PPT DomainPerformance MeasureSafetyPositive Random Mandatory drug testing (excluding newpsychoactive substances)Positive Random Mandatory drug testing (new psychoactivesubstances only)Months drug testing levels not met (sub measure)Risk Management AuditMeasuring the Quality of Prison Life - safetyPrisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisonersAssaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisonersControl and Restraint training/Minimising and Managing PhysicalRestraint training**Tornado commitmentSelf-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisonersHM Inspectorate of Prisons – safetySecurityNumber of escapes from prison or prisoner escortAbsconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisonerdaysSecurity AuditRespectMeasuring the Quality of Prison Life – decencyAudit of Living ConditionsMeasuring the Quality of Prison Life – BME simplifiedHM Inspectorate of Prisons – respectPurposefulActivityHours worked by prisoners in industryHM Inspectorate of Prisons – purposeful activityRehabilitation and Accredited programme completionsRelease Planning Accommodation on first night following releaseEmployment at six weeks following releaseRelease on Temporary Licence – % successful releases4
PPT DomainPerformance MeasureHM Inspectorate of Prisons – rehabilitation and release planningOrganisationalEffectivenessIncident Reporting System – data quality auditIncident Reporting System – assaults checks (sub measure)Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks (sub measure)Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)Foreign National Offender referralsPrison operating within budgetStaff sickness absenceStaff resignation rate* Male Young Offender Institution - Young People establishments undertake Minimising andManaging Physical Restraint training. All other prisons undertake Control and Restrainttraining.Data is reported for each measure from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 except for: Positive Random Mandatory drug testing (new psychoactive substances only) – dueto concerns with data quality this measure only captures the period 1 December2019 to 31 March 2020Accommodation on first night following release which measures data from 1 October2019 to 31 March 2020Employment at six weeks following release which measures data from 1 October2019 to 31 March 2020Measures impacted by COVID-19 as explained on page 11.Descriptions of each performance measure along with the data source and target can befound in Annex A. Information on rating definitions for each performance measure can befound in Annex B.Prison ScoresOverall prison performance ratings are derived from a data-driven score for each prison.Each measure in the performance framework carries a weighting, with the sum of allmeasure weights adding up to 100% for each prison. The weightings represent theimportance of the performance measure for HMPPS. Measures are weighted differently fordifferent prison functions, based on their relative importance. Not all performance measuresin the framework apply to every prison as a result of varying prison functions.Each applicable measure carries a rating for each prison; most are rated on a 1 to 4 scale,while some measures only allow ratings of 1 to 3 and others are binary. As such, themaximum possible score a prison can achieve on the PPT varies depending on whichmeasures apply to the prison and the specific distribution of weights. To overcome this, theoverall prison ratings are assigned using the score the prison achieved as a percentage ofthe maximum possible score achievable.There are also differences in the way measure ratings are calculated. Some compareperformance to target, some are set nationally to reflect consistent expectations across theestate, whereas others are specific to each prison considering a range of local factors. For5
audit and HM Inspectorate of Prisons measures, the measure rating corresponds directly tothe audit or inspection outcome.The overall prison score is calculated by the sum of each individual measure weightmultiplied by the individual measure rating.The thresholds for the Annual Prison Performance Ratings 2019/20 are:RatingPercentage of max score4: Performance is exceptionalGreater than or equal to 82%Less than 82%AndGreater than or equal to 61%Less than 61%AndGreater than or equal to 51%3: Performance is acceptable2: Performance is of concern1: Performance is of serious concernLess than 51%ModerationPrior to publication of Annual Prison Performance Ratings, an annual moderation process isundertaken by HMPPS. During this process performance data is scrutinised by keystakeholders in the prison performance process and considered alongside wider contextualevidence to make a final assessment for the year-end rating of each prison. This ensures therating for each prison is fully reflective of performance.In 2019/20, prisons could voluntarily enter the process, or were automatically referred if oneor more of the following criteria was met: One or more escape from the prison or prisoner escort; Urgent Notification invoked; or First year a prison received a rating or where there was a major change within theyear, e.g. change in functionA moderation panel discussed each proposal to agree a final rating. The panel consisted ofrepresentatives from across HMPPS and MoJ to ensure an independent approach wasmaintained.6
WeightsWeights used in the PPT are separated into three overall distributions to reflect the mainprison functions: male closed prisons; women’s prisons; and male open prisons. The agreedweightings for each distribution can be seen in Annex C.Weight redistributionWhere a measure doesn’t apply to a prison, the weighting for that measure is redistributed toall other measures across the PPT. This is done proportionately to ensure the weightdistribution sums to 100% for all prisons.Inspections, audits and surveys used in the PPT are not always carried out on annual basis,and as such these measures are age weighted on the assumption that the results becomeless relevant over time. The weightings for each of these measures reduce in weight overtime as follows:AgeWeighting reduces by:Up to 1 year0%1 to 2 years20%2 to 3 years40%3 to 4 years60%Over 4 years80%In these cases, the weighting which no longer applies to the measure is proportionatelyredistributed across all other measures in the framework. As such, the measure whichreduced in weight will regain some of this released weight.RulesA number of rules exist in the PPT for certain measures.Drug testing levelsPrisons are required to undertake a minimum number of drug tests each month. Failure todo this affects the maximum achievable performance for the Positive Random Mandatorydrug testing (excluding new psychoactive substances) and Positive Random Mandatory drugtesting (new psychoactive substances only) performance measures.If a prison misses the minimum number of mandatory tests in five or fewer months of theyear, the maximum rating they can achieve for Positive Random Mandatory drug testing(excluding new psychoactive substances) and Positive Random Mandatory drug testing(new psychoactive substances only) is 3.If they miss the minimum number for six or more months, the rating for Positive RandomMandatory drug testing (excluding new psychoactive substances) and Positive RandomMandatory drug testing (new psychoactive substances only) will reduce by 1 rating.Incident Reporting System – assaults checksThis is a subset of records reviewed as part of the Incident Reporting System Audit, lookingspecifically at assaults incidents. If a prison does not meet the target of 85% of assaults7
incidents correctly recorded, the maximum rating they can achieve for both the prisoner onprison assaults rate and assaults on staff rate performance measure is a 2.Incident Reporting System – self-harm checksThis is a subset of records reviewed as part of the Incident Reporting System Audit, lookingspecifically at self-harm incidents. If a prison does not meet the target of 85% of self-harmincidents correctly recorded, the maximum rating they can achieve for the self-harm rateperformance measure is a 2.Accommodation on first night following release and Employment at six weeksfollowing releaseThe accommodation and employment outcomes are relevant to all offenders who arereleased from prison. Although the measures and targets are applied to all establishments,the measures take into account that some prisons only release small volumes of prisoners.Therefore, weighting is not applied for either the accommodation or employment measure forany prison with fewer than 30 releases in the performance year.Not all releases are included in these measures. The rules for inclusion vary betweenaccommodation on first night of release and employment at six weeks following release. Ifthe accommodation measure contributes to the overall rating in a prison, this does notnecessarily mean the employment measure also will and vice versa.Release on Temporary LicencePrisons that release fewer than 30 offenders on temporary licence in the performance yearare exempt from this measure, with weighting redistributed across all other applicablemeasures.Escapes from prison or prisoner escortIf a prison had an escape from prison or prisoner escort during 2019/20, they wereautomatically considered at the moderation process with a view for the overall performancerating to be reduced.Urgent NotificationIf a prison had an HM Inspectorate of Prisons inspection during 2019/20 and received anUrgent Notification as a result, the prison was automatically considered at the moderationprocess to further scrutinise their data-driven rating.First performance rating or change of function in yearIf a prison is included in the Prison Performance Tool for the first time, it was automaticallyconsidered at the moderation process to ensure the data-driven rating is reflective ofperformance over the whole performance year. If a prison was subject to a major change inyear, such as a change in primary function, it was also automatically considered at themoderation process.Inclusion in the Prison Performance ToolIn 2019/20, 119 prisons were included in the PPT compromising of 95 male closed prisons,12 male open prisons and 12 women’s prisons. For a prison to be included in the PPT, theyneed to meet the following criteria: have received an HM Inspectorate of Prisons inspection;8
have received internal audits carried out by HMPPS Operational System &Assurance Group;have maintained consistent performance for six months;have stable Operational Capacity levels.As a result, HMP The Verne were not included in the PPT in 2019/20 and do not feature inthe Annual Prison Performance Ratings 2019/20.HMP Berwyn is included in the Annual Prison Performance Ratings 2019/20 for the first timedue to meeting the above criteria.9
Prison FunctionPrisons are classified by their predominant prison function. A number of prisons are multifunctional and hold a range of types of prisoner. In these cases, the predominant functionhas been reported in the Annual Prison Performance Ratings 2019/20.Prison FunctionDescriptionMale DispersalHold male prisoners classified as category A; prisoners whoseescape would be highly dangerous to the public or the police orthe security of the state and for whom the aim must be to makeescape impossible.Male Category BHold male prisoners classified as category B; prisoners for whomthe very highest conditions of security are not necessary but forwhom escape must be made very difficult.Male Category CHold male prisoners classified as category C; prisoners whocannot be trusted in open conditions but who do not have the willto make a determined escape attempt or the resources to do so.Male OpenAccommodate male category D prisoners whose risk ofabsconding is considered to be low or who are of low risk to thepublic because of the way they have addressed their offendingbehaviour. Open prisons also house indeterminate and longersentenced prisoners who are coming towards the end of theirsentence and who have gradually worked their way down thecategories.Male LocalHold male prisoners. These serve the courts and receive remandand post-conviction prisoners, before their allocation to otherestablishments. They hold many short-term prisoners; remandprisoners; those waiting allocation to training prisons; and mayhold a small number of immigration detainees. The short-termprisoners held in local prisons are those who are due for releasein to the surrounding area and as such engage with resettlementproviders in the last three months of their sentence.Female ClosedHold female prisoners for whom the very highest conditions ofsecurity are not necessary but who present too high a risk foropen conditions or for whom open conditions are not appropriate.Female OpenSimilar to Male Open but holding female prisoners.Female LocalSimilar to Male Local but holding female prisoners.Male Closed YoungOffender InstitutionMale closed establishment holding young men aged 18 to 21.Male Young OffenderInstitution - YoungPeopleHold male young people aged 15 to 17.10
Comparator GroupsThe 2019/20 comparator groups of prisons can be found in Annex D. A statisticalmethodology is used to calculate the comparator groups. A number of contextual variablesare used to determine a statistical score for each prison. These include: Prison Type;Whether the prison holds young offenders;Prison Category;Gender of prisoners;Proportion of prisons who are sex offenders;Complexity of the prison to determine whether it is a standard site, complex ordiverse and complex1;Operational capacity;Average age of the prisoners;Churn of prisoners2;Building age;Proportion of different category prisoners;Proportion of prisoners who are foreign national offenders.The variables are weighted with the most important (as set by HMPPS) contributing more tothe statistically derived score. Prisons with the nearest scores are set as the comparatorswith each prison having a maximum of eight within their group. A maximum distance limit isset to ensure only statistically similar prisons are grouped together. This results in somesmaller comparator groups, particularly for specialised prisons.A comparator group is unique to the prison. If Prison A has Prison B and C in its comparatorgroup, this does not necessarily mean Prison B would have Prison A and C in its group.COVID-19The following measures were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 and datawas excluded from the PPT. Random Mandatory Drug Testing Levels – March 2020 data excludedControl and Restraint Training and Minimising and Managing Physical RestraintTraining – March 2020 data excludedTornado commitment – March 2020 data excludedHours worked in industry – March 2020 data excluded1Prison complexity is a judgement based on prison population and churn rate, amount of staff, complexity ofprisoner population and notoriety, location, site logistics, categorisation and risk, political scrutiny, media relationsand management and financial commercial management.2 Churn of prisoners is the rate of new admissions or transfers in as a proportion of the prison population.11
Worked ExamplesPrison 1 is a male closed prison with all measures except absconds (not applicable toclosed prisons). All audit and HMIP measures took place within the last year.WeightingRatingMeasurescorePositive Random Mandatory drug testing (rMDT) (excludingnew psychoactive substances)2.5%10.025Positive rMDT (new psychoactive substances only)2.5%10.025Months random testing level not met0.0%20Risk Management Audit5.0%20.01Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) - safety3.0%20.06Prisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners4.0%20.079Assaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners5.9%20.119Control and Restraint training0.8%20.02Tornado commitment0.8%10.008Self-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners5.0%10.05HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) – Safety6.1%20.123Number of escapes from prison0.0%30N/AN/AN/ASecurity Audit9.9%30.297MQPL– decency3.0%30.089Audit of Living Conditions5.0%30.149MQPL – BME simplified4.0%30.119HMIP– Respect6.1%30.184Hours worked by prisoners in industry1.6%30.048HMIP– Purposeful Activity6.1%10.061Accredited programmes completions3.3%30.098Accommodation on first night following release0.8%20.016Employment at six weeks following release0.8%10.008Release on Temporary Licence – successes1.6%30.048HMIP– Rehabilitation and Release Planning6.1%20.122Incident Reporting System – Data Quality Audit5.0%20.1Incident Reporting System – assaults checks0.0%30Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks0.0%30Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)0.0%30Foreign National Offender Referrals1.6%20.032Prison Operating within Budget3.3%30.098Staff sickness absence3.3%20.065Staff resignation rate3.3%3Performance MeasureAbsconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisoner daysTotal:12The measurescore is themeasureweightingmultiplied by themeasure rating.The overall scorefor the prison isthe sum of eachmeasure score.Prison 1 scored2.23. Themaximum scoreachievable is 3.85.This gives apercentage scoreof 57.9%,equivalent to anoverall rating of 57.9%2
Prison 2 is a women’s prison. Some measures do not have data. All audits and HMIPmeasures took place within the last year.WeightingRatingMeasurescorePositive Random Mandatory drug testing (rMDT) (excludingnew psychoactive substances)2.7%10.027Positive rMDT (new psychoactive substances only)2.7%10.027Months random testing level not met0.0%30Risk Management Audit5.5%30.165Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) - safety3.3%10.033Prisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners4.4%30.132Assaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners6.6%20.132Control and Restraint training0.9%30.026Tornado commitment0.9%30.026Self-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners5.5%20.11HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) – Safety6.8%40.272Number of escapes from prison0.0%0Absconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisoner daysN/A3N/ASecurity Audit11%1MQPL – decency3.3%20.110.066Audit of Living ConditionsN/AN/AN/AMQPL – BME simplified4.4%30.132HMIP – Respect6.8%30.204Hours worked by prisoners in industry1.8%40.07HMIP – Purposeful Activity6.8%30.204Accredited programmes completionsN/AN/AN/AAccommodation on first night following release0.9%0.018Employment at six weeks following release0.9%21Release on Temporary Licence – successes1.8%30.053HMIP – Rehabilitation and Release Planning6.8%40.272Incident Reporting System – Data Quality Audit5.5%40.22Incident Reporting System – assaults checks0.0%30Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks0.0%30Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)0.0%30Foreign National Offender ReferralsN/AN/AN/APrison Operating within Budget3.6%30.109Staff sickness absence3.6%20.072Staff resignation rate3.6%3Performance MeasureTotal:13N/A0.009The measurescore is themeasureweightingmultiplied by themeasure rating.Prison 2 does nothave data for Auditof LivingConditions,AccreditedProgrammeCompletions orForeign NationalOffender Referrals.The weightassigned to thesemeasures isredistributed acrossall other measureswith data.The overall scorefor the prison is thesum of eachmeasure score.Prison 2 scored2.59. Themaximum scoreachievable is 3.89.This gives apercentage scoreof 66.7%,equivalent to anoverall rating of 966.7%3
Prison 3 is a male open prison with all applicable measures. The HMIP inspection tookplace 2.5 years ago.WeightingRatingMeasurescorePositive Random Mandatory drug testing (rMDT) (excludingnew psychoactive substances)2.8%10.028Positive rMDT (new psychoactive substances only)2.8%40.112Months random testing level not met0.0%30Risk Management Audit4.5%30.135Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) - safety3.2%30.097Prisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners3.6%40.146Assaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners4.3%20.086Control and Restraint training1.9%30.058Tornado commitment0.0%N/A0Self-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners3.9%40.154HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) – Safety4.4%40.175Number of escapes from prisonN/AN/AAbsconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisoner daysN/A6.0%40.24Security Audit3.4%40.137MQPL – decency3.6%30.109Audit of Living Conditions7.3%30.22MQPL – BME simplified4.5%20.09HMIP – Respect4.4%40.175Hours worked by prisoners in industry1.9%20.039HMIP – Purposeful Activity5.0%40.20Accredited programmes completionsN/AN/AN/AAccommodation on first night following release1.1%30.032Employment at six weeks following release1.1%20.021Release on Temporary Licence – successes8.4%30.251HMIP – Rehabilitation and Release Planning5.0%40.20Incident Reporting System – Data Quality Audit5.6%30.167Incident Reporting System – assaults checks0.0%30.00Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks0.0%30.00Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)0.0%40.00Foreign National Offender ReferralsN/AN/AN/APrison Operating within Budget3.8%30.113Staff sickness absence3.8%20.075Staff resignation rate3.8%3Performance MeasureTotal:14The measure scoreis the measureweightingmultiplied by themeasure rating.Prison 3 has allmeasuresapplicable to anopen prison,except ForeignNational Offenderreferrals.As the HMIP is 2.5years old, the fourHMIP measureshave reduced inweighting by 40%.The freed weight isredistributedacross allmeasures with datawith the HMIPmeasuresregaining some ofthis redistributedweight.The overall scorefor the prison isthe sum of eachmeasure score.Prison 3 scored3.17. Themaximum scoreachievable is 3.82.This gives apercentage scoreof 83.0%,equivalent to anoverall rating of 783.0%4
Prison 4 is a male closed prison. Some measures do not apply and the Security Audit wasundertaken 1.5 years ago.WeightingRatingMeasurescorePositive Random Mandatory drug testing (rMDT) (excludingnew psychoactive substances)2.9%20.058Positive rMDT (new psychoactive substances only)2.9%40.116Months random testing level not met0.0%30Risk Management Audit5.8%30.175Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) - safety3.5%30.105Prisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners4.7%30.14Assaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners7.0%40.28Control and Restraint training0.9%30.028Tornado commitment0.9%30.028Self-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners5.8%20.116HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) – Safety7.2%4Number of escapes from prison0.0%30.290Absconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisoner daysN/AN/AN/ASecurity Audit9.3%20.186MQPL – decency3.5%30.105Audit of Living ConditionsN/AN/AN/AMQPL – BME simplified4.7%30.14HMIP – Respect7.2%40.29Hours worked by prisoners in industry1.9%30.056HMIP – Purposeful Activity7.2%20.144Accredited programmes completionsN/AN/AAccommodation on first night following releaseN/AN/AN/AN/AEmployment at six weeks following releaseN/AN/AN/ARelease on Temporary Licence – successesN/AN/AN/AHMIP – Rehabilitation and Release Planning7.2%40.29Incident Reporting System – Data Quality Audit5.8%40.233Incident Reporting System – assaults checks0.0%30Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks0.0%30Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)0.0%40Foreign National Offender ReferralsN/AN/AN/APrison Operating within Budget3.8%20.077Staff sickness absence3.8%30.115Staff resignation rate3.8%3Performance MeasureTotal:15The measurescore is themeasureweightingmultiplied by themeasure rating.Due to the age ofthe Security Audit,the weighting forthis will reduce by20%.The weightingfreed from this andthe measureswithout data isproportionatelyredistributedacross allmeasures withdata. As such theSecurity Auditregains some ofthis redistributedweight.The overall scorefor the prison is thesum of eachmeasure score.Prison 4 scored3.08. Themaximum scoreachievable is 3.90.This gives apercentage scoreof 79.0%,equivalent to anoverall rating of 879.0%3
Prison 5 is a women’s prison which didn’t meet target for IRS Assaults checks and IRS SelfHarm checks. It has data for all other measures and all audits and HMIPs are within the lastyear.WeightingRatingMeasurescorePositive Random Mandatory drug testing (rMDT) (excludingnew psychoactive substances)2.4%10.024Positive rMDT (new psychoactive substances only)2.4%10.024Months random testing level not met0.0%30Risk Management Audit4.9%20.097Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) - safety2.9%30.087Prisoner on prisoner assaults incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners3.9%20.078Assaults on staff incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners5.8%2Control and Restraint training0.8%30.1170.023Tornado commitment0.8%3Self-harm incidents – rate per 1,000 prisoners4.9%10.0230.049HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) – Safety6.0%30.18Number of escapes from prison0.0%30Absconds from open prison conditions – rate per 100,000 prisoner daysN/AN/AN/ASecurity Audit9.7%30.291MQPL – decency2.9%30.087Audit of Living Conditions5.3%20.107MQPL – BME simplified3.9%30.117HMIP – Respect6.0%30.18Hours worked by prisoners in industry1.6%20.031HMIP – Purposeful Activity6.0%20.12Accredited programmes completions4.7%30.14Accommodation on first night following release0.8%20.016Employment at six weeks following release0.8%10.008Release on Temporary Licence – successes1.6%10.016HMIP – Rehabilitation and Release Planning6.0%30.18Incident Reporting System – Data Quality Audit4.9%10.05Incident Reporting System – assaults checks0.0%20Incident Reporting System – self-harm checks0.0%20Data Integrity (Governance & Operational Audit)0.0%30Foreign National Offender Referrals1.6%30.047Prison Operating within Budget3.2%30.096Staff sickness absence3.2%20.064Staff resignation rate3.2%2Performance MeasureTotal:16The measurescore is themeasure weightingmultiplied by themeasure rating.Prison 5 was rated1 for the IRSAssaults checkmeasure. Themaximum ratingachievable forAssaults on Staffand Priso
Prison level performance is monitored and measured using the Prison Performance Tool. The PPT uses a data-driven assessment of performance in each prison to derive overall prison performance ratings. As in previous years, data-driven ratings were ratified and subject to in depth scrutiny at the moderation process which took place in June 2020.
The prison population stood at 78,180 on 31 December 2020. The sentenced prison population stood at 65,171 (83% of the prison population); the remand prison population stood at 12,066 (15%) and the non-criminal prison population stood at 943 (1%). Figure 1: Prison population, December 2000 to 2020 (Source: Table 1.1) Remand prison population
In 2016, S&P Global Ratings acquired 49% of TRIS Ratings, a leading provider of credit ratings based in Bangkok, Thailand, and opened a new office in Santiago, Chile n S&P Global Ratings presence n S&P Global Ratings affiliate Globally, S&P Global Ratings rated more than 3.6 trillion in new debt in 2015 The table above reflects information .
Industry Top Trends 2020: North America Merchant Power S&P Global Ratings November 7, 2019 2 Ratings trends and outlook North America Merchant Power Chart 1 Ratings distribution Chart 2 Ratings outlooks Chart 3 Ratings outlook net bias Source: S&P Global Ratings. Ratings data measured at quarter end. Data for Q4 2019 is end October, 2019 0 5 10 15
prison. By 2004, people convicted on federal drug offenses were expected to serve almost three times that length: 62 months in prison. At the federal level, people incarcerated on a drug conviction make up nearly half the prison population. At the state level, the number of people in prison for drug offenses has increased nine-
FIDH/UCL - THAILAND. ANNUAL PRISON REPORT 2022 7 1. Introduction The annual prison report is the first and only independent and comprehensive review of prison conditions in Thailand. The 2022 report covers developments, trends, facts, and figures from 1 January to 31 December 2021. It is based on the following information: 1) interviews with former
ZOMBICIDE - GUIDE 7 SEASON 2 : PRISON OUTBREAK DOG COMPANIONS ZOMBIE DOGZ Prison Outbreak is often compared to an “advanced” Zombicide in a prison atmosphere. Richer and more tactical, Prison Outbreak introduces a new Zombie type, the Berserkers, in addition to new sculpts of Standard Zombies.
Figure 2: Prison Service structure from 1 April 2017 A functional group structure has been adopted for the management of some Prison Service establishments (i.e. for 'young people' within a distinct Youth Custody Service; for 'long-term/high security' prisons; and prisons for women) whilst others are based on prison
The first 100 days of employment within any business represents a golden opportunity to make a positive impact, cement your place in the organization and build a platform for ongoing success. By day 101 you could be sitting on top of the world. Alternatively, in that first 100 days you could relegate your future career with the organization to ‘catch-up’ mode. Even worse, some people will .
