Household Food Insecurity In Canada 2017-2018 - PROOF

1y ago
12 Views
2 Downloads
602.12 KB
27 Pages
Last View : 24d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nora Drum
Transcription

HOUSEHOLDFOOD INSECURITYIN CANADA 20172018Valerie Tarasuk and Andy Mitchell

AcknowledgmentsThis report is a PROOF initiative supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Researchgrant PJT 153260 and the Joannah and Brian Lawson Centre for Child Nutrition atthe University of Toronto. The authors are indebted to Stephanie Vasko, Sarah AnneCharlebois, and Niveen Saleh from the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness for theirlayout and design work on the report.Hub Solutions is a social enterprise embedded within the Canadian Observatory onHomelessness (COH). Income generated from Hub Solutions fee-for-service work isreinvested into the COH to support research, innovation, policy recommendations andknowledge mobilization.Learn more: www.hubsolutions.caHow to cite this document: Tarasuk V, Mitchell A. (2020) Household food insecurity inCanada, 2017-18. Toronto: Research to identify policy options to reduce food insecurity(PROOF).Retrieved from https://proof.utoronto.ca/ 2020 Research to identify policy options to reduce food insecurity (PROOF)This research paper is protected under a Creative Commons license that allows you toshare, copy, distribute, and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes, provided youattribute it to the original source.

Executive SummaryHousehold food insecurity refers to the inadequate or insecure access to food becauseof financial constraints. Food insecurity takes a serious toll on individuals’ health andwell-being, and it places a significant burden on our health care system. Although therehas been rigorous measurement and monitoring of household food insecurity in Canadasince 2005, there is little indication that this problem is getting better. Drawing on datafor 103,500 households from Statistics Canada’s Canadian Community Health Surveyconducted in 2017 and 2018, we found that 12.7% of households experienced some levelof food insecurity in the previous 12 months. There were 4.4 million people, including morethan 1.2 million children under the age of 18, living in food-insecure households in 2017-18.This is higher than any prior national estimate.Food insecurity is much moreprevalent in Nunavut than anyother part of Canada. In 201718, 57.0% of households inNunavut reported some levelof food insecurity and almosthalf of these householdswere severely food insecure.The prevalence of foodinsecurity was also high inNorthwest Territories, at21.6%. The lowest prevalenceof household food insecuritywas 11.1% in Quebec. Quebecwas the only place in Canadawhere the prevalence of foodinsecurity fell significantlybetween 2015-16 and 2017-18.Household Food Insecurity BY PROVINCE & 3.3%Data Source: Statistics Canada, CanadianCommunity Health Survey (CCHS), 2017-18.14.0%11.1%15.3%13.0%Among the 35 census metropolitan areas examined, food insecurity was most prevalentin St John’s, affecting more than 1 in 6 households in this city. The lowest rate of foodinsecurity was in Quebec City, where 1 in 12 households was food-insecure.3

Food insecurity is more prevalent amonghouseholds with children. In 2017-18, 17.3%of children under 18, or more than 1 in 6,lived in households that experienced foodinsecurity. Nunavut and the NorthwestTerritories had the highest prevalence ofchildren living in food-insecure householdsat 79% and 30% respectively, but rateswere also high in many provinces. About 1in 5 children in Saskatchewan, Manitoba,Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, andNew Brunswick lived in householdsreporting some food insecurity.1 in 6CHILDRENFood insecurity is closely related toother markers of social and economiclive in food-insecure householdsdisadvantage. It is most prevalent amonghouseholds with low incomes, lone-parentfamilies, those who rent rather than ownData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Healththeir housing, and those who identify asSurvey (CCHS), 2017-18.Indigenous or Black. In 2017-18, 65% offood-insecure households were reliant on employment incomes. Among those outside theworkforce, food insecurity affected 60% of households reliant on social assistance, 32% ofthose reliant on Employment Insurance or Workers’ Compensation, and 7% of householdsreliant on pensions and retirement incomes.Most food-insecurehouseholds are inthe workforce.65% reported theirmain source ofincome as wagesor salaries fromemployment.The persistently high prevalence of household food insecurityacross Canada highlights the need for more effective, evidencebased policy responses by the federal government to address thesocial and economic circumstances that give rise to this problem.The differences in food insecurity rates across the provinces andterritories also point to the important roles that provincial andterritorial governments can play in protecting their populationsfrom food insecurity.4

IntroductionThe Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)in 2017-18 marks the first time since 2011-12that the household food insecurity has beenmeasured in every province and territory. Drawingon data from this survey, we present a portrait ofhousehold food insecurity in Canada, examiningwho is most affected and how food insecurityrates differ across the country. Our report isdesigned to provide a tool to monitor trends andidentify priorities for interventions to addressthis major public health issue. It builds on theextensive work of Health Canada and StatisticsCanada in measuring and monitoring householdfood insecurity in Canada. To gain a deeperunderstanding of the problem of food insecurityin Canada, readers are encouraged to consult theresearch papers and reports footnoted throughoutthis report.The report has been prepared by PROOF, aresearch program launched in 2011 with fundingfrom the Canadian Institutes of Health Research,to identify effective policy interventions to addresshousehold food insecurity. This is the fifth reporton household food insecurity in Canada thatPROOF has released.insecurity can range from concerns about runningout of food before there is more money to buymore, to the inability to afford a balanced diet, togoing hungry, missing meals, and in extreme cases,not eating for wholedays because ofa lack of food andThe deprivationexperienced bymoney for food.households thatare food-insecureis not confined tofood; householdfood insecuritydenotes pervasivematerial deprivation.Although foodinsecurity was initiallyunderstood to be afood problem, withmore research ithas become clearthat the deprivationexperienced byhouseholds that are food insecure is not confinedto food. Rather, the food problems that definehousehold food insecurity denote much morepervasive material deprivation. Food-insecurehouseholds compromise spending across abroad range of necessities, including housing andprescription medication costs1 .Food insecurity is a serious public health problemin Canada because individuals’ health and wellbeing is tightly linked to their household foodsecurity status. Among children, exposureto severe food insecurity (measured as childhunger) has been linked to poorer health statusand the subsequent development of a variety ofchronic health conditions, including asthma anddepression2 . Adults in food-insecure householdsare much more likely than food-secure adults toreport having been diagnosed with a wide varietyWhat is FoodInsecurity?Household food insecurity, as this problem ismeasured and monitored in Canada, refers tothe inadequate or insecure access to food dueto financial constraints. The experience of food1 For more information about household expenditure patterns in the context of household food insecurity, please see Fafard StGermain & Tarasuk. Prioritization of the essentials in the spending patterns of Canadian households experiencing food insecurity. PublicHealth Nutrition 2018;21(11):2065-78. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000472. To learn about the relationship between food insecurity andpeople’s abilities to afford prescription medications, see Men et al, CMAJ Open 2019.2 This information comes from the results of several studies using data from Canada’s National Longitudinal Study of Children andYouth. See, for example, Kirkpatrick and McIntyre & Potestio. Child hunger and long-term adverse consequences for health. Archivesof Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2010;164(8):754-62. McIntyre et al. The pervasive effect of youth self-report of hunger ondepression over 6 years of follow up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017;52:537-47.5

How is Food InsecurityMeasured in Canada?Health carecosts rise withincreasingseverity ofhousehold foodinsecurity.of chronic diseases, including mood and anxietydisorders, arthritis, asthma, back problems, anddiabetes3 . The relationship between food insecurityand health is graded, with adults in more severelyfood-insecure households more likely to reportpoorer mental health across a broad spectrumof measures and to have been diagnosed withmultiple chronic conditions4 . Food insecurity hasalso been associated with higher mortality ratesamong adults in Canada.Food insecurity places a substantial burden on ourhealth care system. We charted a sharp increase inprovincial health care expenditures for adults inOntario with increasing severity of household foodinsecurity, such that over a 12 month period, adultsin severely food-insecure households cost theprovince, on average, about 2.5 times the healthcare dollars of those who were food secure.Data on food insecurity are collected through theCCHS, a cross-sectional survey administeredby Statistics Canada that collects health-relatedinformation from about 130,000 Canadians overa two year period. The sample is designed to berepresentative of the ten provinces and threeterritories, but it excludes full-time members of theCanadian Forces, individuals living on First Nationsreserves, Crown Lands, or in the Quebec healthregions of Région du Nunavik and Région desTerres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James, and persons inprisons or care facilities. Although on-reserve FirstNations people and homeless people compriserelatively small proportions of the Canadianpopulation, their high levels of vulnerability to foodinsecurity must mean that the true prevalence offood insecurity is underestimated because of theiromission5 .Since 2004, the Household Food Security SurveyModule has been included in the CCHS to monitorhouseholds’ experiences of food insecurity overthe previous 12 months. (See Appendix A for thefull Household Food Security Survey Module.) Thissurvey module consists of 18 questions asking therespondent whether he/she or other householdmembers experienced the conditions described,which range in severity from experiences ofanxiety that food will run out before householdmembers have money to buy more, to modifyingthe amount of food consumed, to experiencinghunger, and in the extreme, going a whole daywithout eating. These questions distinguish theexperiences of adults from those of children,recognizing that in households with children,adults may compromise their own food intake toreallocate scarce resources for children.3 Tarasuk et al. Chronic physical and mental health conditions among adults may increase vulnerability to household food insecurity.J Nutr 2013;143(11):1785-93. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.178483.4 Tarasuk et al. Chronic physical and mental health conditions among adults may increase vulnerability to household food insecurity. JNutr 2013;143(11):1785-93. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.178483.5 For information about food insecurity among First Nations living on reserves and in northern communities, see reports from the FirstNations Regional Health Survey.6

Based on the number of positive responses tothe questions posed, households are classifiedas either food secure or marginally, moderately,or severely food insecure. (See Appendix B fora full description of the classification scheme.)Food-secure households are those who gave noindication of any income-related problem of foodaccess. Those who are marginally food insecurehave reported some concern or problem of foodaccess over the past 12 months. Householdsclassified as moderately food insecure havereported compromises in the quality and/orquantity of food consumed among adults and/ orchildren. Those classed as severely food insecurehave reported more extensive compromises,including reducedfood intake amongThe results in thisadults and/or childrenreport are basedbecause of a lack ofon populationmoney for food.included marginally food-insecure households inour estimates of the prevalence of household foodinsecurity in Canada, whereas the results providedby Statistics Canada only count householdsthat are moderately or severely food insecure.Secondly, we have calculated the total numberof people affected by food insecurity by countingall members of households classified as foodinsecure. The prevalence estimates presented hereprovide a comprehensive account of the problemof household food insecurity in Canada.WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A MARGINALLYFOOD-INSECURE HOUSEHOLD?34.6% reported being worried that their foodwould run out before they got money to buy more.41.6% reported that they could not afford to eatbalanced meals.weighted data fromapproximately103,500householdsincluded in the2017-18 CanadianCommunity HealthSurvey.14.6% reported that the food they bought for thehousehold did not last and there was no money tobuy more.In this report, wepresent estimates ofthe number of adultsand children livingin food-insecurehouseholds and therate of householdfood insecurity amongchildren, based on population-weighted data fromabout 103,500 households surveyed in CCHS2017-18. In contrast to the annual reports PROOFissued for 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, we arepresenting the results for 2017 and 2018 togetherin this status report. Pooling the two years isconsistent with Statistics Canada’s approach tosampling in the cycle, and it allows us to reportmore stable estimates of key indicators forsmaller jurisdictions.12.5% reported that they relied on a few low-costfoods to feed their children.2.4% reported that they could not afford to feedtheir children balanced meals.In 2015, Statistics Canada implemented a majorredesign of the CCHS. This included changesto the method of sampling households for thesurvey6 . The changes were implemented toimprove the population representativeness ofthe data from CCHS. However, because of thechanges, Statistics Canada cautions users againstcomparing more recent survey results with thoseprior to 2015. Consequently, we only present acomparison of prevalence estimates from CCHS2017-18 and 2015-16. This comparison is limitedto provinces and territories that measured foodinsecurity in 2015-16. The food security moduleOur estimates differ from those released byStatistics Canada and included in Canada'sOfficial Poverty Dashboard. Firstly, we have6The method of sampling employed for CCHS since 2015 is described here.7

was optional content during that cycle of CCHS,and the governments of Ontario, Newfoundlandand Labrador, and Yukon chose to not measurefood insecurity among their populations.In comparing prevalence estimates over timewithin the provinces and territories for which foodinsecurity measurements are available for both2015-16 and 2017-18, it is important to consider the95% confidence intervals around these estimates.The confidence intervals are an indication ofthe degree of uncertainty associated with eachprevalence estimate. Only where confidenceintervals do not overlap can the differences inprevalence estimates between the two surveycycles be considered statistically significant.CANADIANHOUSEHOLDS12.7% of households,one in eight , are food-insecure3.0% 5.7 % 4.0%Prevalenceof Food InsecurityHouseholdsin Canada areseverelyfood insecureIn 2017-18, 12.7% of households in the countryexperienced some level of food insecurity duringthe previous 12 months. This represents 1.8 millionhouseholds, or 4.4 million individuals, includingover 1.2 million children under the age of 18. Thismeans that 17.3% of children under 18, or morethan 1 in 6, lived in households that experiencedfood insecurity in 2017-18.4.41.8millionHouseholdsin Canada aremoderatelyfood insecureHouseholdsin Canada aremarginally foodinsecureData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey(CCHS), 2017-18.The levels ofdeprivationdocumentedwere substantial,with 5.7% ofhouseholds(i.e. 819,900households)classified as moderately food insecure, indicatingcompromises in the quality and possibly thequantity of food consumed over the past 12months, and 3.0% (i.e. 429,900 households)severely food insecure. Almost 1 in 4 foodinsecure households in Canada were severely foodinsecure. This is concerning because severe foodinsecurity denotes an extreme level of deprivationthat is strongly associated with multiple negativehealth outcomes, including mortality.429,900 householdswere severely foodinsecure, experiencingserious levels of fooddeprivation because ofa lack of money for food.millionINDIVIDUALSINCLUDING1.2 MILLION CHILDREN in Canadaare living in food-insecure households.Data Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community HealthSurvey (CCHS), 2017-18.8

Household Food Insecurity In Canada By PROVINCE & TERRITORYKEYSevere Food InsecurityNL3.3%PENSNBQCONMBSKABBCYTNTNU2.9% 7.0%6.8%4.6%Moderate Food InsecurityMarginal Food Insecurity4.7 %4.0%6.4%2.9% 6.0%4.4%4.1%2.3% 5.1%3.7%3.2%5.8%3.1%7.0%4.3%4.2%2.8% 6.5%4.6%3.2%6.1%3.7 %3.2%5.5%5.1%7.4%5.0%11.0%3.7 %4.3%5.7 %23.7 %Data Source: Statistics Canada, CanadianCommunity Health Survey (CCHS), 2017-18.25.8%7.6%20%40%Food Insecurity byProvince or TerritoryFood insecurity in Nunavut was extraordinarilyhigh, with a prevalence of 57.0% in 2017-18. Thisis the highest rate of food insecurity charted inNunavut since monitoring began. The secondhighest prevalence (21.6%) of food insecurity inthe country in 2017-18 was found in the NorthwestTerritories, and the third highest prevalence(16.9%) was found in Yukon. The lowest prevalenceof household food insecurity in 2017-18 was inQuebec, at 11.1%.As with food insecurity overall, the prevalence ofsevere food insecurity was much higher in Nunavut(23.7%) than elsewhere in Canada. Relatively highrates of severe food insecurity were also observedin Yukon (5.1%), Northwest Territories (5.0%), andNova Scotia (4.6%). Severe food insecurity waslowest in Quebec, with a prevalence of 2.3%.9Prevalence tells us the proportion of the populationor subpopulation experiencing food insecurity. Tounderstand how the problem of food insecurityaffects Canadians, it is also instructive to examinethe distribution of individuals living in food-insecurehouseholds across the country. In 2017-18, 84% ofpeople living in food-insecure households were inone of four provinces: Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, orBritish Columbia.Ontario, Québec, Alberta & British Columbiaaccounted for the largest share of food insecurehouseholds in Canada, accounting for:84%OF THE FOODINSECUREPOPULATIONData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community HealthSurvey (CCHS), 2017-18.

Which Householdsare Most Vulnerableto Food Insecurity?NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING INFOOD-INSECURE HOUSEHOLDSby Province & 0ON1,719,300MB175,900SK164,000ABAmong households with children, the risk of foodinsecurity is much higher for lone parents thancouples. In 2017-18, 11.8% of couples with childrenunder 18 were food-insecure, but this rate rose to21.6% for male lone-parent households and 33.1%for female lone-parent households with childrenunder 18.518,600BC555,700YT 6,100NT9,900NU24,500500,0001,000,000Household food insecurity is a measure of materialdeprivation, tightly linked to other indicatorsof social and economic disadvantage. Notsurprisingly, therefore, food insecurity is mostprevalent among households with inadequate,insecure incomes and few if any financial assets7.1,500,000HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDRENVS. THOSE WITHOUT CHILDRENNochildren 18in householdFood insecurity is more prevalent amonghouseholds with children than those withoutchildren. In 2017-18, 16.2% of households with atleast one child under 18 years of age were foodinsecure, compared to 11.4% of households withouta child under 18 years of age.MODERATELYFOOD INSECUREHouseholds with before-tax incomes in thelowest decile had the highest prevalence of foodinsecurity (35.6%) and 11.9% were severely foodinsecure. The prevalence of food insecurity fellto 22% among households in the second lowestincome decile, and only 5.5% reported severe foodinsecurity. The rate of food insecurity continuedto fall as household income rose (See AppendixC for the detailed breakdown of household foodinsecurity status by income decile).MARGINALLYSEVERELYFOOD INSECUREFOOD INSECURE3.1%4.8%3.6%11.4% total food insecureOne or morechildren 18in householdMODERATELYFOOD INSECUREMARGINALLYFOOD INSECURESEVERELYFOOD INSECURE2.9%8.3%Data Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey(CCHS), 2017-18.5.1 %7 For a more in-depth analysis of the predictors of foodinsecurity in Canada, see Tarasuk et al, Geographic and sociodemographic predictors of household food insecurity in Canada,2011-12. BMC Public Health 2019;19.16.2% total food insecure10

KEYFood Insecurity Levels byMAIN SOURCE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOMESevere Household Food InsecurityModerate Household Food InsecurityMarginal Household Food InsecurityData Source: Statistics Canada, CanadianCommunity Health Survey (CCHS), 2%8.6%2.3%5.5%2.2%Wages, salaries orself-employment2.8%1.7%Senior’s income,including dividendsand interest11.6%EmploymentInsuranceor workers’compensationThe main source of a household’s income is alsoa strong predictor of their food security status.Households whose main source of income waseither pensions or dividends and interest had thelowest rate of food insecurity (6.8%). This findingis consistent with the results of earlier populationsurveys, and it has been linked to the protectiveeffect of Canada’s public pension system 8 . Foodinsecurity affected 11.7% of households relianton employment incomes, 32.0% of households25.4%Social Assistance4.8%Otherwho reported their main source of income asEmployment Insurance or Workers’ Compensation,60.4% of households reliant on social assistance(i.e. welfare and disability support programs), and18.4% of those reliant on other income sources(e.g., child benefits, child support, alimony, etc).Among households reliant on social assistance, thelevels of deprivation were substantial, with 25.8%experiencing moderate food insecurity and 25.4%experiencing severe food insecurity.8 See the discussion of this issue by Emery et al, How a guaranteed annual income could put food banks out of business. SPPResearch Papers 2013;6(37):1-20.11

Social assistance programs are administered bythe provincial and territorial governments and varyconsiderably across jurisdictions. The bar graphbelow presents the rate of food insecurity amongsocial assistance recipients by province andterritory. Social assistance recipients in Nunavuthad the highest rate of food insecurity in thecountry (93.1%); the lowest rate (54.9%) was foundin New Brunswick.Food-insecure households’MAIN SOURCE OF INCOMEKEYWages, salaries or self-employmentSenior’s income, including dividends and interestEmployment Insurance or workers’ compensationSocial AssistanceOtherProportion of Households Reliant onSOCIAL ASSISTANCE who were FoodInsecure by BSKABBCYTNTNUData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey(CCHS), 2017-18.Although the prevalence of food insecurity amonghouseholds reliant on wages and salaries wasrelatively low, they made up the majority (65.0%)of food-insecure households9 . Conversely, whilesocial assistance recipients were at highest riskof food insecurity, they comprised only 14.5% ofall food-insecure households in the country. Thepercentage of food-insecure households who werereliant on wages and salaries differed by province,ranging from a low of 53.8% in Newfoundland andLabrador to a high of 75.2% in Alberta.9 To learn more about food insecurity in the workforce, seeMcIntyre et al, When working is not enough: food insecurity in theCanadian labour force. Public Health Nutrition 2012;17(1):49-57.1214.5%5.8%12.2%65.0%Proportion of Food-InsecureHouseholds who were relianton WAGES, SALARIES OR SELFEMPLOYMENT by .4%66.6%75.2%67.9%65.2%68.7 %61.4%NLPENSNBQCONMBSKABBCYTNTNUData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey(CCHS), 2017-18.

Prevalence of Household Food Insecurityin Relation to RACIAL/CULTURAL IDENTITYRenters are much more likely thanhomeowners to be food-insecure.& INDIGENOUS kEast and Southeast AsianSouth AsianArab and West AsianIndigenousOther/Multiple originsData Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community HealthSurvey (CCHS), 2017-18.Food insecurity is much more prevalent amonghouseholds who rent rather than own theirdwelling, with 25.4% of renters and 7.2% of ownersaffected by some degree of food insecurity. Infact, 61% of food-insecure households in Canadaare renting their accommodation. This finding isconsistent with the results of two recent Canadianstudies examining the protective effects of homeownership in relation to food insecurity10.Although the vast majority of food-insecurehouseholds in Canada identify as White, theprevalence of household food insecurity differsmarkedly by Indigenous status and racial/culturalgroup. The highest rates of food insecurity werefound among households where the respondentidentified as Indigenous or Black, at 28.2%, and28.9% respectively. While most of the differencesbetween racial/cultural groups shown in thegraph below diminish when other householdcharacteristics are taken into account, the muchgreater probability of food insecurity amongIndigenous and Black households persists11 .Some other household characteristicsassociated with increased risk of foodinsecurity:Food insecurity was also more prevalentamong households with lower levels ofeducation. Whereas only 7.2% of householdsincluding at least one member with a Bachelor’sdegree or higher were food insecure, this rate roseto 13.9% among those with other post-secondaryeducation, 18.4% among households where thehighest level of educational attainment was highschool completion, and 21.1% among those whereno one had completed high school.The prevalence of food insecurity differedin relation to respondent’s immigrationstatus. The prevalence among householdswhere the respondent was a recent immigrantto Canada (less than 5 years) was 17.1%, but therate for households where the respondent hadimmigrated to the country five or more years agowas 13.8%, approaching the rate for Canadian-bornrespondents (12.2%)12.10 To learn more about the relationship betweenhomeownership and food insecurity, see McIntyre et al,Homeowner versus non-homeowner differences in householdfood insecurity in Canada. Journal of Housing and the BuiltEnvironment 2015;31(2):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s10901-015-9461-6;and Fafard St-Germain & Tarasuk, International Journal of Equityin Health 2020.12 When other household characteristics (e.g., income,housing tenure, income source) are taken into account,studies repeatedly indicate that immigration per se isnot an independent risk factor for food insecurity inCanada. However, it is important to note that refugeescannot be identified through the data available in CCHS.11 See analysis of vulnerability associated with race andIndigenous status in McIntyre et al, When working is not enough:food insecurity in the Canadian labour force. Public Health Nutrition 2012;17(1):49-57; and Tarasuk et al. Household food insecurity inOntario during a period of poverty reduction, 2005-2014. Canadian Public Policy 2019.13

How Many Childrenare Affected?Is the Problem of FoodInsecurity in CanadaGetting Betteror Worse?In 2017-18, 17.3% of children under 18 years ofage in Canada (an estimated 1,227,900 children)lived in households affected by some level of foodinsecurity.The prevalence of food insecurity for householdswith children differs dramatically depending onthe province or territory of residence. Nunavutand the Northwest Territories had the highestprevalence of children living in food-insecurehouseholds, at 78.7% and 30.0% respectively.Elsewhere in Canada, however, the proportion ofchildren living in food-insecure households wasalso of concern. Over 20% of children in Manitobaand Saskatchewan and about 19% of childrenin Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and NewBrunswick were in food-insecure households.This means that about 1 in 5 children in theseprovinces were in families who sometimesstruggled to afford the food they needed. Thelowest prevalence of children in food-insecurefamilies was found in British Columbia, at 15.1%.Although food insecurity has been measuredconsistently in Canada since 2005, major changesto the design of the CCHS in 2015 mean that theresults from 2017-18 are only directly comparableto those from the 2015-16 survey cycle. The graphbelow shows the prevalence of total (marginal,moderate and severe) food insecurity in eachprovince and territory in 2015-16 and 2017-18,with blanks for the three jurisdictions that didnot measure their food insecurity in 2015-16.Differences from one survey cycle to the nextcan only be considered statistically significant ifthe 95% confidence intervals for these estimates(indicated by the thin black line at the top of eachcolumn) do not overlap. The only statisticallysignificant change in prevalence was in Quebecwhere food insecurity fell from 12.7% in 2015-16 to11.1% in 2017-18.PROPORTION OF CHILDREN UNDER 18Who Lived in Food-InsecureHouseholdsData Source: StatisticsCanada, CanadianCommunity HealthSurvey (CCHS),2017-18.18.3%

Household food insecurity refers to the inadequate or insecure access to food because of financial constraints. Food insecurity takes a serious toll on individuals' health and well-being, and it places a significant burden on our health care system. Although there has been rigorous measurement and monitoring of household food insecurity in Canada

Related Documents:

Food Insecurity Measures U.S. Census CPS Household survey questions collect data on food insecurity; these are unavailable at the county level. Feeding America generates county-level food insecurity estimates. Federal Food Assistance Participation Measures Participation in food assistance programs helps alleviate food insecurity, but

Food Insecurity in Early Childhood New Policy Series on Food Security Food insecurity and hunger are related but not synonymous.1 The concept of "food security" is used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to measure a household's social and economic ability to access adequate food. The most common cause of food insecurity is

Household food insecurity A household-level economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food. Households are considered food insecure if they experience 'severe' or 'moderate' food insecurity as measured by the Household Food Security Survey Module. See Chapter 2. Households below average income

in need as illustrated by news reports of miles-long lines at food pantries. In this report,1 we estimate current rates of food insecurity and the extent to which food insecurity rates have increased in national data and by state using the Census’s Household Pulse Survey (CHHPS). We find that food insecurity has doubled overall,

Second, food insecurity was on the rise in the UK prior to Covid-19. Controlling for socioeconomic variables, the probability of low-income adults being food insecure rose from 27.7% in 2004 to 45.8% in 2016.2. Third, food insecurity has more than doubled under Covid-19 and lockdown. Food insecurity levels in May 2020 were 250% higher than pre .

june-2020.pdf Photo credit: USDA Photo by Lance Cheung, Flickr Food Insecurity in the Census Household Pulse Survey Data . Table 2 displays the rates of household food insufficiency in the CHHPS collected from April 23-May 5 (column 1) and collected from May 7-12 (column 4). Between the two surveys, food insufficiency estimates increased

Food insecurity is an economic condition, meaning that it is driven primarily by lack of money and other critical resources. The following section outlines drivers that have been directly linked to food insecurity as well as household or individual characteristics that increase the risk of food insecurity.

AAT Advanced Diploma in Accounting Synoptic Assessment – SAMS – Assessment book 2 Notes for students and training providers This is a sample assessment and mark scheme which is reflective of the question types, depth of content coverage, the level of demand, duration and mark allocation of tasks that will be in the live assessment It is not designed to be used on its own to determine .