Building Inspection Report - Buildings Department

1y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
1.85 MB
73 Pages
Last View : 7d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Halle Mcleod
Transcription

Buildings DepartmentPractice Note for Mandatory Buildingand Window Inspection SchemesPNBI-7Building Inspection ReportPursuant to section 12(2) of the Building (Inspection and Repair) Regulation(B(I&R)R), a registered inspector (RI) must, within 7 days after completion of a prescribedinspection in respect of a building, submit an inspection report to the Building Authority(BA). The RI is also required under section 30(1)(a) of the B(I&R)R to deliver a copy ofthe inspection report to the person for whom the prescribed inspection is carried out.2.Guidelines on preparing an inspection report have been given in the Code ofPractice for the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme and the Mandatory WindowInspection Scheme. The following reference documents are provided to facilitate thepreparation of inspection report:(a)Checklists for preparing an inspection report for different building elements(Appendix A);(b)Sample inspection report on projections (balcony / verandah) (AppendixB); and(c)Sample inspection report on common parts and external walls (AppendixC).3.The reference documents listed above are for general guidance and are notmeant to be exhaustive. The RI may include other items as necessary. The checklistsshould be used for assuring that essential information is included in the inspectionreport. The checklists are however NOT required to be submitted to the BA.4.To facilitate record management, the RI should submit to the BA a separatenon-rewritable DVD-ROM containing a copy of the inspection report in PDF file formatof 200dpi resolution together with a hard copy of the inspection report.5.To ensure due administration of the Buildings Ordinance (BO), the BA carriesout random audit checks on inspection reports submitted. The BA will consider takingprosecution and/or disciplinary actions against RI who blatantly or repeatedlycontravenes the requirements of the BO and its subsidiary regulations.( YU Tak-cheung )Building AuthorityRef. : BD GR/1-125/101/0 (II)First issue :April 2016Last revision : April 2018This revision : August 2020 (AD/MBI) (Paragraph 3(b) of Appendix C amended)

Appendix A(PNBI-7)Checklists for preparing an inspection reportfor different building elementsThe requirements for inspection report are generally stipulated in the BuildingsOrdinance (BO), the Building (Inspection and Repair) Regulation and related regulations, theCode of Practice for the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme and the Mandatory WindowInspection Scheme (the Code) and PNBIs. To ensure that all the essential information iscontained in the inspection report, the following checklists are provided for RI’s reference:ChecklistNo.TitleSC1Master Checklist for Inspection ReportSC2Checklist for External WallSC3Checklist for Structural ElementsSC4Checklist for Fire Safety ProvisionsSC5Checklist for Drainage SystemSC6Checklist for Unauthorized Building Works(UBW) / Change in UseSC7Checklist for Curtain WallSC8Checklist for Cantilevered Projecting StructuresSC9Checklist for Balcony/Verandah

Checklist No. SC1Master Checklist for Inspection ReportThe inspection report is prepared for the following MBIS notice served under section 30B ofthe Buildings Ordinance (BO): 30B(3) : Prescribed Inspection in respect of the common parts of a building 30B(4) : Prescribed Inspection in respect of the external wall of a building/premises 30B(5) : Prescribed Inspection in respect of the projections of a premises 30B(6) : Prescribed Inspection in respect of the signboards of a building Yes1.Have following building information beenobtained?-2. No or NotandReportedApplicable Detailsrefer to thereport atPage No.OP date;Original and current usage;Number of storeys and units;Approved floor plans where available;Principal construction materials;Salient information of previous inspection andrepair;Name of Owners’ Corporation and managementcompany.Reference documents-Have the approved building, structural,drainage, alteration and addition plans beenobtained and listed out in the report? -Have the plans and details of minor works beenobtained and listed out in the report? -Have the plans and documents submitted to theBA under section 39C of the BO for validationof prescribed building or building works (i.e.signboard, supporting frame for A/C unit,drying racks and window canopies) beenobtained and listed out in the report? -Have Fire Safety Directions been received? -Are there any information and records ofprevious large scale repair works? Checklist No. SC 1P. 1 / 4

Yes No or NotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. Checklist for External Wall (No. SC2) Checklist for Structural Elements (No. SC3) Checklist for Fire Safety Provisions (No. SC4) Checklist for Drainage System (No. SC5) Checklist for Unauthorized Building Works /Changein Use (No. SC6) Checklist for Curtain Wall (No. SC7) Checklist for Cantilevered Projecting Structures(No. SC8) Checklist for Balcony/Verandah (No. SC9) andReported3.Method Statement for Building Inspection-Apart from visual inspection, have any othertests conducted?Brief Description :-4.If RI’s representative is appointed to assist RI toascertain the extent of the defects, have theparticulars, qualifications and experience of theRI’s representative been provided in the report?Inspection Result-Have the checklists for the following buildingelements been completed (if applicable)?-Have “Inspection Forms for MBIS” beenprovided in the report? -Have the photos for each elevation of thebuilding been provided? -Have the summary of all building defects anddeficiencies in table form been provided? The table shall be accompanied by annotatedphotos and marked up plans, where necessary,or inspection results accompanied by annotatedChecklist No. SC 1P. 2 / 4

Yes No or NotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. andReportedphotos showing conditions of the buildinginspected where rectification and repair worksare not required.-5.In case that a defect extending from commonparts or external walls to individual flats isidentified and the RI intends to draw BD’sattention to it, is the record included in thereport?Summary and Assessment-Have a concise summary and assessment of theconditions of the whole building and its majorelements been provided? -Is detailed investigation proposed? Detailed investigation may be required whenthere are any serious defects, not arising fromnormal deterioration, constituting structuralinstability or serious health hazard, or where theextent or cause of the defects cannot beascertained in the inspection.-6.If there are any building components and areaswhich required regular maintenance,replacement or management for maintainingsafety until the next cycle of inspection, hasadvice on the need for regular maintenance andreplacement of building components beenprovided? Repair Proposal-Have marked-up plans for repair works beenprovided? Repair isnotrequiredThe mark up plan, where appropriate, shouldshow the demarcation of the different types ofrectification and repair works to be carried outunder the MWCS (specifying the class, type,and item) or works requiring prior approval ofplans and consent to the commencement ofworks from the Building Authority (BA).Checklist No. SC 1P. 3 / 4

YesandReported7. No or NotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No.-Has the method statement for rectification andrepair works including details of the proposedmethods, materials, specifications andprecautionary measures been provided? -Has the proposal of proof tests been provided? -If RI’s representative will be appointed in repairstage in accordance with section 6.4 of theCode, have particulars, qualifications andexperience of the RI’s representative beenprovided? Recommendation for Improvement/Upgrading Works-Has recommendation forimprovement/upgrading works such as thoseunder the purview of the FS(CP)O or FS(B)Obeen provided?Checklist No. SC 1P. 4 / 4

Checklist No. SC2Checklist for External Wall Yes1.3.ApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. NotSufficient Visual Inspection-2.andReported No or NotHas sufficient visual inspection been carried outfrom a close distance to all external walls(including protective barriers, parapets andbalustrades) and has hammer tapping beencarried out at representative area? (PNBI-6refers)sufficient.However, moreinformationwill be/ havebeen obtainedin item (2) tosupport theobservationIf item 1 above could not be met:-Would re-inspection be carried out at repairstage? -Have any tests been carried out?(e.g. infrared thermography) -Any recent records of building conditions? Defects on the External Wall Finishes & Rendering-Are there any cracks or spalling observed? -Are there any loose or missing tiles/renderingobserved? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Brief Description :4.Defects on the Fin/Grilles/Cladding/Appendages-Are there any defects observed?Examples:a. Dilapidation;b. Rust or corrosion of metallic parts or fixing;c. Cracks or signs of distress;d. Loose or defective fixing; ande. Deformation or displacement.(4/2018)Checklist No. SC 2P. 1 / 1

Checklist No. SC3Checklist for Structural Elements Yes1.Sufficient Visual Inspection-Has sufficient visual inspection been carried outfrom a close distance to structural elements andhas hammer tapping been carried out atrepresentative area?andReported No or NotApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No. Notsufficient.However,moreinformationwill be/ havebeen obtainedin item (2) tosupport theobservation(Cantilevered slab type structure shall be fullyexposed for inspection while other structureshall be at least 30% exposed for inspection.)2.3.If item 1 above could not be met:-Would re-inspection be carried out at repairstage? -Have any other tests been carried out?(e.g. infrared thermography) -Any recent records of structural conditions? Defects on Structural Elements-Are there any defects observed?Examples:a. Dampness;b. Rust stains or corrosion of reinforcement;c. Cracks or signs of distress;d. Spalling;e. Delamination;f. Exposed reinforcement;g. Voids and honeycombing;h. Deformation or displacement; andi. Abnormal separation of the building fromadjoining buildings.4.Cantilevered Projecting Structures-Are there any cantilevered projectingstructures? Canopy Balcony / Verandah FinsChecklist No. SC 3P. 1 / 2

Features A/C Platform Drying Racks Planter boxes-Has/Have checklist(s) for cantileveredprojecting structures been completed? (please refer to No. SC8 for cantileveredprojecting structures and No. SC9 for Balconyand Verandah)Checklist No. SC 3P. 2 / 2

Checklist No. SC4Checklist for Fire Safety Provisions Yes and1. NotHave Fire safety directions under the FS(CP)O orFS(B)O been received? Not If “Yes”, have upgrading works beencompleted? InHas sufficient visual inspection from a closedistance at representative areas been carriedout?sufficientFire Safety Direction-3.ApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No.Sufficient Visual Inspection-2.Reported No or NotreceivedprogressMean of Escape-Are there any defective or missing exit signs? -Are there any inadequate lighting? -Are there any defective balustrades and handrailsin staircases and escape routes? -Are there any door swing obstructing means ofescape? -Are there any blocked or obstructed means ofescape? -Are there any defective treads? -Apart from the above defects, are there any otherdefects observed? Brief Description :4.Means of Access for Fire Fighting and Rescue-Is there any blocked means of access to building,particularly along rear lane? -Is there any blocked or obstructed means ofaccess within building such as access to thefireman’s lift lobby on G/F? -Is there any dilapidated emergency vehicularaccess? Checklist No. SC 4P. 1 / 2

Yes and No or NotReportedApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No.-Are there any defects in the integrity of thefireman’s lift lobby, such as any unauthorisedopening in the enclosure wall, insufficientventilation or obstruction to the fireman’s lift? -Apart from the above defects, are there any otherdefects observed? Brief Description :5.Fire Resisting Construction-Are there any defective or dilapidated materialsresulting in inadequate fire resisting construction? -Are there any ventilation ducts or other buildingservices passing through compartment walls orfloors breaching the requirements of fire resistingconstruction? -Are there any broken hinges or glass panels infire doors? -Are there any defective or non-provision of selfclosing mechanism in fire doors? -Are there any broken or dilapidated fire doors orfire resisting glazing? -Is there any inadequate fire resistance of fire dooror glazing? -Are there any non-emergency services such aselectric wires, cables and meters in the escapestaircases and lobbies, without adequate fireprotection? -Are there any damaged staircase enclosure suchas walls, windows and doors including those forthe protected lobby? -Is there any obstruction to fire dampers or fireshutters for compartmentation? -Is there any defective or blocked staircase topvents? -Apart from the above defects, are there any otherdefects observed?Brief Description : Checklist No. SC 4P. 2 / 2

Checklist No. SC5Checklist for Drainage System Yes1.2.3.4.Sufficient Visual Inspection on Building Drainage SystemandReported No or NotApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No.-Has sufficient visual inspection from a closedistance at representative areas of the drainagepipe been carried out? Notsufficient.However,moreinformationwill be/ havebeen obtainedin item (2) tosupport theobservation-For any common drainage pipes inside privatepremises, has sufficient inspection from a closedistance of the drainage pipes with minimumevery 3 floor been carried out? Nocommondrainagepipes insideprivatepremisesIf item 1 above could not be met:-Would re-inspection be carried out at repairstage? -Have any other tests been carried out?(e.g. CCTV) -Any recent records of drainage pipesconditions? Inspection on Underground Drainage System-Has CCTV been carried out? -Any recent records of underground drainageconditions? -Have any other methods been carried out toinspect the underground drainage? Defects observed-Is there any visible leakage or potential leakagesuch as rusty support, dislocation of pipe joints? -Are there any blockages or overflow from thedrainage system? Checklist No. SC 5P. 1 / 2

Yes-Are there any discharge or untreated tradeeffluent, including hot water, into the drainagesystem or to external parts of the building oropen area?-Is there any misconnection to the publicdrainage systems? No or NotandReportedApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No. (e.g. Discharge of foul or waste water to thesurface water drainage system or external partsof the building or open areas, or discharge ofsurface water to the foul water system)-Are there any misconnected drain pipesaffecting sanitary or hygienic condition of thebuilding? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Examples:a. Corrosion, leakage, deformation,displacement, damage and blockage of drainpipes and traps;b. Corrosion, loosening or breaking of metalbrackets;c. Damage or blockage of manhole/septic tank;d. Broken of surface channel, gullies and catchpits;e. Missing drain pipes or grating at the top ofventilation pipes; andf. Deterioration or missing of mica flap in thefresh air inlet.Checklist No. SC 5P. 2 / 2

Checklist No. SC6Checklist forUnauthorized Building Works(UBW)/Change in Use1.UBW identified: Yes No or NotApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No.andReported-Are there any unauthorised structures in thecommon parts and on roof top, flat roof, yard,lane or street? -Are there any unauthorised projections andsignboards erected on the exterior of thebuilding? -Are there any unauthorised alterations oradditions affecting fire safety? Examples: Doors, gates or roller shutters obstructingescape routes; Unprotected openings at enclosure walls ofexit routes or compartment walls, floors andceilings; Structures on refuge floors; Door openings from cocklofts to exitstaircases in single-staircase buildings; Alteration to escape routes, protected lobbiesor fire resisting construction resulting indeficiencies in fire safety; Structures on main or flat roofs resulting ininadequate means of escape; Structures on main or flat roofs resulting indeficiency in fire resisting construction suchas inadequate fire separation between thestructures concerned and the main or flat roofdesignated as a refuge floor; Change in provision of fireman’s lift or lobbyof the fire fighting and rescue stairway; and Removal of fire doors, fire shutters or otherfire resisting construction.-Are there any unauthorised alterations oradditions of structural system? -Are there any unauthorised alterations oradditions of drainage system? -Is there any unauthorised alteration of externalwalls or parapets? Checklist No. SC 6P. 1 / 2

Yes No or NotApplicableDetails referto the reportat Page No.andReported-Is there any unauthorised removal or alterationof provisions for barrier free access for peoplewith disability? -Are there any alterations or additions tobalconies, canopies or other approvedprojections of the building? -Are there any signs of suspected subdivision offlats? Examples: Presence of many flat door openings, doorbells, electricity meters or drain pipeconnections.-Is there any unauthorized change in useaffecting structural or fire safety?Examples: Storage of hazardous materials; Exceeding the approved capacity in terms ofmeans of escape and/or imposed load of aroom or storey.2.Assessment to the UBW/Change in Use-Does the UBW/Change in Use constituteobvious hazard or danger to life or property? No-Is the parent structure overloaded and showsserious signs of distress? No-Do the UBWs constitute serious environmentalnuisance or health hazard? No-Are there any UBW under construction duringinspection? NoChecklist No. SC 6P. 2 / 2

Checklist No. SC7Checklist for Curtain Wall Yes No or NotDetails referto thereport atPage No.andReported1.2.3.ApplicableSufficient Visual Inspection-Has sufficient visual inspection from a closedistance at representative areas been carriedout? Notsufficient.However, moreinformationwill be/ havebeen obtainedin item (2) tosupport theobservation-If obvious defects were found on thecorresponding external surfaces, hassufficient visual inspection of the curtainwall from internal areas been carried out? Notsufficient.However, moreinformationwill be/ havebeen obtainedin item (2) tosupport theobservationIf item 1 above could not be met:-Would re-inspection be carried out at repairstage? -Have any other tests been carried out? -Any recent records of conditions? Defects observed-Are there any defects observed?Examples: Cracked, loose, broken or missing glasspanes; Corroded or loose fixings; Defective sealants; Defective fire stop; Defective locking devices bar hinges; Signs of water leakage behind curtainwall.Checklist No. SC 7P. 1 / 1

Checklist No. SC8Checklist for Cantilevered Projecting Structures YesandReported1. No orNotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No.Type of Cantilevered Projecting StructuresCanopy / Fins / Features / A/C Platform / Drying Rack / PlanterBox*(Please refer to Checklist No. SC9 for inspection ofBalcony/Verandah)2.Sufficient Visual Inspection-Has sufficient visual inspection from a closedistance at representative areas been carriedout? Not sufficient(Cantilevered slab type structure shall be fullyexposed for inspection while other structureshall be at least 30% exposed for inspection.)3.Cantilevered slab canopy projecting over street(Not applicable for other type of projections)-Has the concrete cover at suitable locations atthe root of the canopy immediately adjoiningthe parent structure been opened up with sitemeasurement taken for below?i. Screeding thicknessii. Cover of the reinforcementiii. Size of the reinforcement-Have information from building records asbelow been verified on site?i. Spanii. Thickness of slab4.RC Elements-Are there any cracks or sign of distress alongthe support of cantilevered slab? (item no. inthe Diagram 1)Checklist No. SC 8P. 1 / 3

Yes-Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? (item no. and inthe Diagram 1)andReported No orNotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. Examples:a. Defective tiles/rendering;b. Cracks or spalling;c. Delamination;d. Exposed reinforcement;e. Voids and honeycombing; andf. Deformation or displacement.5.Metal Elements-Is there any rust or corrosion observed? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Examples:a. Dilapidation;b. Loose or defective fixing; andc. Deformation or displacement.6.Surface Drainage (item no. in the Diagram 1)-Are there any leaking or broken drainage pipe? -Are there any defects observed in the supportingframe? -Are there any blockages observed? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Brief Description :7.Unauthorised Building Works-Are there any unauthorised building works?Details:-thickened finishes/Change in use/ or*Have the building works found deviated fromthe building records constituted obvious hazardor danger?Checklist No. SC 8P. 2 / 3

Yes-8.Have the deviations caused the structureoverloaded or seriously impaired the safety ofthe structure?andReported No orNotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. Assessment-Is there any overloading to the cantileveredprojecting structure observed? No-Is the cantilevered projecting structure safe? No-Is further testing or detailed investigationrecommended? (Reference shall be made toSection 4.3.1 of the Code) No* Delete where appropriate Canopy / Fins / Features / A/C PlatformDiagram 1 : Inspection Items for Cantilevered Projecting Structures Soffit of the Structure Support of the StructureChecklist No. SC 8 Surface of the Structure Drainage SystemP. 3 / 3

Checklist No. SC9Checklist for Balcony/Verandah Yes No or NotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No. Not sufficientandReported1.Sufficient Visual Inspection-Has sufficient visual inspection from a closedistance at representative areas been carriedout?(Cantilevered slab type structure shall be fullyexposed for inspection while other structureshall be at least 30% exposed for inspection.)2.RC Elements-Are there any cracks or sign of distress alongthe support of cantilevered slab? (item inDiagram 1) -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? (items , and in Diagram 1) Examples:a. Defective tiles/rendering;b. Cracks and spalling;c. Delamination;d. Exposed reinforcement;e. Voids and honeycombing; andf. Deformation or displacement.3.Metal Railing / Glass balustrade (items & in Diagram 1)-Is there any rust or corrosion observed? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Examples:a. Dilapidation;b. Loose or defective fixing;c. Deformation or displacement;d. Cracked, loose, broken or missing glasspanels; ande. Defective sealants.Checklist No. SC 9P. 1 / 3

Yes No or NotApplicableDetailsrefer to thereport atPage No.andReported4.Surface Drainage (item in Diagram 1)-Are there any leaking or broken drainagepipe? -Are there any defects observed in thesupporting frame? -Are there any blockages observed? -Apart from the above defects, are there anyother defects observed? Brief Description :5.Unauthorized Building Works-Are there any unauthorised building works?Details: change of parapet/enclosure with wall/thickened finishes (item inDiagram 1)Change in use/ or*6.Nodiscrepancieswere observed-Have the building works found deviated fromthe building records constituted obvioushazard or danger? Not applicable-Have the deviations caused the structureoverloaded or seriously impaired the safety ofthe structure? Not applicableAssessment-Is there any overloading to thebalcony/verandah observed? No-Is the balcony/verandah safe? No-Is further testing or detailed investigationrecommended? (Reference shall be madeSection 4.3.1 of the Code) No* Delete where appropriateChecklist No. SC 9P. 2 / 3

Diagram 1: Inspection Items for Balcony (also applies to Verandah) Ceiling of the Balcony/Verandah Support of the Balcony/Verandah Surface of the Balcony/Verandah Drainage System RC Parapet (internal surface) Metal Railing Thickened finishes Glass balustrade(4/2018)Checklist No. SC 9P. 3 / 3

Appendix B(PNBI-7)Sample Inspection ReportMandatory Building Inspection SchemeInspection Report on Projections (Balcony / Verandah)Flat 8, 9/F, Block A, Square Tower, Wan ChaiStatutory Notice No. :UMB/50C199/1401-999/0055Name of RI: Lau YIMCertificate of registration number: RI (E) 555/1232Date of expiry of registration: 7.7.2017Signature of RI:My SignatureDate of Report: 16.2.2015Cover Page

MBIS Inspection Report for ProjectionsStatutory Notice No: UMB/50C199/1401-999/00551.Summary1.1I carried out the prescribed inspection personally as required bythe above statutory notice for the projections including abalconyNote1 on 10 February 2015.Note 1: List of possible items: balcony / verandah2.1.2*In my opinion the above premises has been rendered dangerousor is liable to become dangerous, and a prescribed repair isrequired to be carried out to render the building safe / in myopinion the above premises is safe and no prescribed repair isrequired.1.3*There are unauthorised building works (UBWs) in the abovepremises, however, in my opinion, the UBWs do not constituteany obvious hazard or danger. I have informed the owner andrecommend him/her to consider rectifying and removing theUBWs.Building InformationBuilding Information(Details)Date of Occupation Permit:3 April 1960Approved usage:*domestic/commercial/industrial useCurrent usage:The balcony has been enclosed withwindows and become part of thekitchenStructural arrangement of the *It is reinforced concreteprojection:cantilevered slab structure/*: Denotes possible items1/9

MBIS Inspection Report for ProjectionsStatutory Notice No: UMB/50C199/1401-999/0055reinforced concrete cantileveredbeam and slab structure/ reinforcedconcrete column and beam structureSalient information of previousinspection and repair:3.*The owner has no record of anyrepair since he has owned thepremises 10 years ago / Spallingoccurred about 3 years ago andrepaired accordingly.Reference DocumentsI have reviewed the following documents:(a) Approved building, structural, drainage, alteration and additionplans:Drawing TitleDrawing No.Date of ApprovalGBP for 9th FloorRC Detail for 9th FloorGBP 9/1000RC 6/1013 Sept 195929 Dec 1959(b) Plans and details of minor works carried out under the simplifiedrequirements:MinorNo.Works MinorWorks ItemsMW1311034151.6DescriptionDate ofCompletionAlteration ofprotective barrier7 Jul 2013*: Denotes possible items2/9

MBIS Inspection Report for ProjectionsStatutory Notice No: UMB/50C199/1401-999/00554.Method Statement for Building InspectionI have used the following methods and carry out the following tests toinspect the projections of the premises:5.Inspection MethodScope of Inspection*Visual Inspection*Whole place including ceiling, floor slab,inside and outside of metal railing, inside ofRC parapet.*Hammer Tapping*Whole place including ceiling, floor slab,inside of RC parapet.Inspection ResultsI have personally carried out inspection for the projections of the abovementioned premises, including checking the structure and relateddrainage pipe and outlet of the projections. Inspection Form is providedin Section 9.1.The cantilevered span of the balcony is about 1100 mm and thestructural depth of the concrete slab is about 150 mm, which conform tothe approved drawings. The thickness of finishes on top of the slab is30mm. The weight of finishes should not cause any overloading.*No ponding, seepage, cracks or other defects were noted.*No cracks were found along the support of the balcony.*I have found the following defects: (Please refer to Section 9.2 for thephotos and details)(a) Corroded metal railings were noted.(b) Spalling at the ceiling of balcony was noted.*: Denotes possible items3/9

MBIS Inspection Report for ProjectionsStatutory Notice No: UMB/50C199/1401-999/0055Other Examples:*The floor drain at the balcony was blocked.*Spalling on the internal surface of parapet.6.Record of UBWs identified*I have not found any UBWs in the projection(s).*I have identified the following UBWs:(a) Protective barrier has been altered/floor screed is thickened/additional partition walls are installed/external walls have beenadded/external walls have been altered, that is/are different fromthe approved plans.In my opinion, the UBWs do not constitute any obvious hazard ordanger. I have informed the owner and recommend the owner toconsider rectifying and removing the UBWs.7.Assessment of ConditionsMy assessment of the conditions of the projections is given below:* Based on the inspection results and in my opinion, the projections ofthis premises are liable to become dangerous and prescribed repair isrequired to be carried out to render the building safe. The repairproposal is provided in Section 8.* In my opinion the projections of this premises are safe.prescribed repair is required.NoI have copied this report to the owner and explained the content of it tothe owner.*: Denotes possible items4/9

MBIS Inspection Report for ProjectionsStatutory Notice No: UMB/50C199/1401-999/00558.Proposal of the Prescribed RepairThe owner should appoint a registered contractor to carry out thefollowing prescribed repair works and the works should be supervisedby a Registered Inspector.Item of PrescribedRepair WorksMinor WorksItems(If

inspection in respect of a building, submit an inspection report to the Building Authority (BA). The RI is also required under section 30(1)(a) of the B(I&R)R to deliver a copy of the inspection report to the person for whom the prescribed inspection is carried out. 2. Guidelines on preparing an report hainspectionve been given in Code of the

Related Documents:

1997 Ashton-Barnes Inspection, Stability, and Spillway Adequacy Report 2002 J.F. Brennan Co. Underwater Inspection Report and Videos 2004 DNR Inspection Report 2008 J.F. Brennan Co. Underwater Inspection Report and Videos 2009 DNR Inspection Report 2010 Stanley Consultants Inspection Report

INSPECTION INFORMATION 1.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY Commercial building xxxxxx Glendale, California 1.2 INSPECTION DATE Thursday February 25, 2016 1.3 INSPECTION TIME 2:30 p.m. . This inspection and report has been performed in accordance with the California Real Estate Inspection Association (CREIA) Standards of Practice which is incorporated herein .

Jun 27, 2019 · 2021 SUTTON AVE CINCINNATI OH 45230 County HAMILTON Building Approval Date 03/09/1988 Use Group/Code E Occupancy Limit 49 Maximum Under 2 ½ Fire Inspection Approval Date Food Service Risk Level Inspection Information Inspection Type Quality Monitoring Inspection Scope Partial Inspection Notice Unannounced Inspection Date End Time 06/27/2019

The BR requires mandatory inspections for more simple buildings and structures, such as houses (class 1a . buildings) and sheds and garages (class 10 buildings and structures). Guidelines are available for these classes of buildings to assist building certifiers to undertake inspections. The BR does not currently provide a similar inspection

Property Inspection Report Charlie and Mary Sample Residential Inspection Inspection Date: 11/20/06 Prepared for: Charlie and Mary Sample Report number: 60022011 Inspector: John P. Vagliardo Vagliardo Inspection Service Office 607-433-1630 Fax 607-433-1640 www.vagliardoinspectionservice.com .

transporting students. The pre-trip inspection consists of two parts: a stationary inspection and an operating inspection. The stationary inspection consists of an interior and exterior inspection. The exterior inspection is also known as the “daily walk-around.” The operating inspection is performed while the bus is being driven.

Preliminary Inspection Responsibilities 1. Read and understand the job specification 2. Attend the pre-job conference 3. Become aware of safety hazards and responsibilities 4. Prepare inspection forms and inspection plan 5. Inspection of jobsite conditions 6. Inspection of materials 7. Inspection of equipment 8. Monitor ambient conditions

time test takers of the American Board of Radiology radiation biology (left), physics (center), and clinical (right) qualifying examinations from 2005-2016 [2017 unavailable]. Reported average pass rates from 2018 are plotted as outliers (for radiation biology and physics) and labeled. Two-sided P-values (with distribution of normality confirmed by the Shapiro test) demonstrate that the .