Parametric Modeling For Advanced Architectu Re

1y ago
5 Views
2 Downloads
1.91 MB
9 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Grant Gall
Transcription

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: Parametric modeling for advanced architectureArticle · January 2011CITATIONSREADS221,2372 authors:Milena StavricOgnen MarinaGraz University of TechnologySs. Cyril and Methodius University50 PUBLICATIONS 69 CITATIONS24 PUBLICATIONS 68 CITATIONSSEE PROFILESome of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:Folding View projectArchitectural scale modelling in the digital age View projectAll content following this page was uploaded by Milena Stavric on 28 September 2017.The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.SEE PROFILE

Issue 1, Volume 5, 20119Parametric Modeling for AdvancedArchitectureM. Stavric1 and O. Marina2Abstract—Computer simulation of evolutionary processes isalready well established technique for the study of environmental,biological and economic dynamics. Use of algorithms for generationof virtual entities that will develop its functional and formalproperties within the non-linear process of adaptation of complexsystem is a foundation for new point of view in understandingarchitecture and urban environment. This paper describes parametricapproach in architectural design through elaboration of shift inparadigms in architecture that has brought to the idea of use ofparametric modeling with emphasis on two different groups ofparametric software and presents the possibilities of generativealgorithms in modeling architectural form and development of citiesand urban design.Keywords—geometry, parametric design, generative algorithmsurbanism, architectural design.I. INTRODUCTIONDESCRIPTION and explanation of a natural phenomenonwithin abstract mathematical framework has become verysuccessful with introduction of calculus in 17th century.Physical phenomena of world around us have becomereproducible without direct reference to physical reality. It wasachieved with use of codes and equitation that represent theunderlying order and regularities of represented phenomena.The use of code in architecture as a formal and designconvention has a long tradition. The transformations of thosecodes and constraints have determined development ofarchitecture throughout history. With introduction ofcomputation, codes in architecture could be understood as aset of instructions determining certain attributes of the formalentity or instructing a process of manipulation of the same.The formalization of the design process and use ofcomputation has opened an endless range of generative powerof algorithms. This has enabled architects of today to createnew environments with a system of codes that is coherent withthe nature of the phenomena and in the same time to becreative. It is a moment of revelation in a sense of newlyM. Stavic is a researcher at the Graz University of Technology, Faculty ofArchitecture, Institut of Architecture and Media, Austria. Inffeldgasse 10/2,8010 Graz, Austria ( phone: 43-316-873-4738, e-mail: mstavric@tugraz.at).O. Marina is Assistant Professor at Faculty of Architecture, University “Ss.Cyril and Methodius”- Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, blvd. Partizanskiodredi 24, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia (phone: 389 2 3116367, e-mail:ognenmarina@gmail.com)released power of codes and algorithms that contemporaryarchitect can use to breed new forms rather than to specificallydesign them.Digital modeling and visualization of architecturalbuildings has become the benchmark in the work of architectsand is unavoidable in architectural education [19][24]. Fromthe original 2-D programs used for drawing architecturaldesigns, the software used for computer-aided design has nowturned into intelligent 3-D software packages based onparametric modeling. These new possibilities have led to newmovements in architecture and defined the field of nonstandard architecture.Judging by the latest trends, the development of digitaldesign did not end with simple parametric modeling; it hastaken a step ahead by using generative algorithms. Severalsoftware packages offer graphical algorithm editors (e.g.Coffee, Grasshopper), which are directly linked to 3-Dmodeling tools and allow interactive parametric modeling.These editors do not require any previous knowledge ofprogramming or scripting, and yet they make it possible fordesigners to generate a broad range of non-standard designsthat can be changed interactively. This new parametricallybased approach in architectural design enables architect tosearch for a completely new level in form generating process.It is possible with design of non-standard objects that can bedynamically transformed to achieve a strong interaction andintegration of design process with fabrication of architecturalelements, or in the scale of urban plans with development ofsemantically enriched elements.This paper gives a brief overview of parametric designusing two distinct types of parametric software packages andpresents the possibilities of applying of generative algorithmsin modeling architectural form and development of cities andurban design.II. SHIFT IN PARADIGMS IN ARCHITECTUREDominant typologies that have served to legitimized theproduction of architectural and urban form since 18th centurywere either based on the idea of return of architecture to itsnatural origins – a model of primitive shelter as an imitation ofthe order of Nature, or emerging as a result of Industrial era –architecture as a process of production of functional parts [26].In these concepts urban form is just an inert receptor ofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 2011externally imposed order and therefore its form ispredetermined by fixed typologies [4].The order in classical architecture has been determined byformal tools or techne of composition connected with orderand distribution of matter. The form is predetermined byformal typology organized and transferred in reality throughcanonical system of formal conventions and is encoded bysocial conventions through which building obtains socialrelevance within the built and social environment. The idea ofarchitecture and urban form as an inert receptor ofpredetermined form originates in part from the dominantconcepts of representation. Formal elements of architecturalform represented in Cartesian three-dimensional space aredetermined by fixed coordinates of their points within thesystem. With this, elements of architecture are nothing morethan a copy of ideal, platonic forms liberated of any trace ofinherent order [5].Most of the paradigms were delegitimized with the fact thatthe origin of the order of urban form was positioned outsidethe system instead to acknowledge the inherent order of thesystem as fundamental for form generating process.With process of revision of Modernism dominant conceptsin architecture are based on phenomenology directlyconfronting with functionalism and universal positivisticmodels of Modernism [9]. With this shift in paradigms andtranscendence of concepts in architecture the interdependenceof the inherent nature of phenomena of architecture and theprocess of its creation has become a new challenge. The natureof the architecture and urban form is inherently dynamic andcannot be determined by fixed types regardless of the vastnessof the number of types. Therefore, the existing concepts intheory of architecture and urban form based on fixedtypologies do not provide solid ground for understanding theprocess of creation of form and the phenomenon of urbanity ingeneral. Solution of this situation can be reach only by radicalchange in the viewpoint: the architecture and urban form not tobe conceived as a static system of predetermined ideal formsbut rather as a dynamic system of changes that will generate acomplex result.The concepts of instability and de-centralization of identity[7] will be used in architecture to exclude existence of an idealform [4] and to determine that the shape is a unique result ofprocess of morphogenesis. As a result of this, the idea of formin architecture will shift from a fixed typology toward ahistorically convergent result of a form generating process intime, shaping unique and historic result that is coherent to thenature of the phenomena that we recognize as architecture.The emerging form will be a result of a process ofmorphogenesis as a historically embedded process of creationand adaptation [11].With this shift in paradigms a theoretical ground for noveldesign tools and methods in architecture has been established.Within this theoretical framework the creation of a form can beunderstood as a process of individualization where everyparticular property of a distinctive element is a result of10accumulation and interaction of different influences,conditions and restrictions, a process that is completelydependent on specific and historically contingent details.Adjacent to this concept is the topological paradigm whereidentity and position of each of the elements or parts of itwithin the system are determined exclusively through itsrelation with all other elements within the system. Since thereis no centre to dictate the predetermined form of elements ofthe architectural and urban form, formal order is establishedonly by locally defined relations between the elements. Thisdecentralized order generating process is distributed within,and in the same time dependant on a population of elements.So, instead of thinking in terms of a form defining centre thesystem should be understand in terms of population ofelements. This multiplicity [6] of elements and local relationsthat create the order of the system are the source of amorphogenesis process. In a situation where a system ofarchitectural forms is defined as a population of elements, wealways have to specify the process of creation first, in order tohave the idea of the overall form of the system. This process isinherently historic and it is based on the existence ofdifferences between the elements. Without the existence ofthese productive differences that raise the process ofadaptation and differences leveling within the system and thediffusion of novel and creative solutions within the populationof formal elements there would be no morphogenesis.These are the new paradigms and new concepts that shouldhelp us to construct a model of dynamic development ofarchitectural and urban form. Therefore, in the next chapter wewill introduce some of the concepts and softwares that areenabling the creation of form as a dynamic and parametricallydetermined non-linear process.III. PARAMETRIC DESIGNDuring the past fifteen years digital media in architecturewas used in different ways and influenced the whole field ofconstruction and design. At the beginning digital media wasapplied only as a representational tool. With emerging digitaltechnology architecture has found a new tool for conceptualdesign in digital media [22].On the one hand architectural design was inspired by thevarious possibilities of digital technology itself. On the otherhand many topics from different fields influenced the design.Former “invisible” mathematical and geometrical algorithms,forms and structures are now visible and spatialunderstandable for architects and, therefore, usable. Using newtechnique architectural design has established computationalconcepts such as: topological space (topological architectures),isomorphic surfaces (isomorphic architectures), motionkinematics and dynamics (animate architectures), keyshapeanimation (metamorphic architectures), parametric design(parametric architectures), genetic algorithms (evolutionaryarchitectures) or fractal geometry (fractal architecture) asdiscussed in Kolarevic [14].Generally in parametric design form is shaped by values ofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 2011parameters and equations are used to describe the relationshipsbetween the forms. Hence, interdependencies between formscan be established and their behavior under transformation canbe defined (mathematically and geometrically). Since about1990 parametric design has influenced the development ofdigital architectural design, where we can distinguish between:- architectural CONCEPTUAL parametric design and- architectural CONSTRUCTIVE parametric design.IV. CONCEPTUAL PARAMETRIC DESIGNIn conceptual parametric design, it is the parameters of aparticular design that are declared, not its shape. By assigningdifferent values to the parameters different objects orconfigurations can be easily created. Rosenman and Gero,Prousalidou [18] analyze parametric and generativerepresentations of buildings, whether based on orthogonal orcurvilinear geometry (DeCOi [3]). They are powerful owing totheir ability to capture a high degree of variation in a fewnumerical values. Software like Maya or Rhinoceros (with Melor Rhino Script) offers such script editors for parametricdesign. Maya is software developed for film industry(primarily for animation and capturing) but lately manyarchitects (Fig. 1) have used it for conceptual design.11such technology is to reduce the drafting time and correctionsto 2D drawings. We detected some limitations in such softwaretools. First, it is not possible to consider a wide range ofdifferent building materials to make one standard for allmanufactures of building materials and components with theaim to provide an “intelligent” model. Second, these softwaretools are originally designed for standard building elements,whereas non-standard elements of contemporary digitalarchitecture cannot be implemented [15].In contemporary architectural practice there are somesuccessful examples of using parametric design and we willdiscuss some of the projects.Nicholas Grimshaw & Partners used parametric design forthe arched roof of the train shed at the international terminal atWaterloo Station in 1993. Each arch and its related claddingare different as the roof width changes along the curved track.In this project only a single parametric model of one arch ismodelled and different parametric controlled variations definethe whole roof.A bigger-scale project is the Hessing Cockpit Buildingwithin the alliance of the Acoustic Barrier in Utrecht, Holland(Fig. 2).Fig. 2 Oosterhuis/Boer, Hessing Cockpit Building, Utrecht 2005Fig. 1 Mel scripting, student Martin Schnabel, Institute ofArchitecture and Media, Course DM2This design method requires knowledge of programming orscripting and it is inherent of the mathematical algorithmswhereby interactive design is not possible.Kas Oosterhuis and Sander Boer proposed oneparameterized universal detail for the whole structure, OneBuilding – One Detail [2]. Oosterhuis/Boer provided a digitalcontrol model to the contractors, which allowed them to buildall constructive details on top of this control structure. Allsteps are described as an Autolisp routine. The Swiss FederalInstitute of Technology has realized three projects of complexforms: Swissbau Pavilion, Inventioneering Architecture,Libeskind’s Futuropolis (Fig. 3) in timber by implementingparametric design as early as at the beginning of the designprocess [21].V. CONSTRUCTIVE PARAMETRIC DESIGNConstructive parametric design refers to data embeddedwithin a predetermined 3D object. This parametric concept isrealized in various CAD packages like Autodesk Revit, SoftPlan, Nemetschek, ArchiCAD or Chief Architect. Instead ofdrawing lines, arcs, etc. designers can insert pre-drawncomponents, doors, windows, load elements, stairs or roofsetc.This results in 3D models instead of 2D drawings, which isalready standard in ship-building industry. The objective ofFig. 3 Libeskind’s FuturopolisINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 2011Frank O. Gehry went one step further using fully parametricsupport for a whole building – from design to manufacturing.Frank Gehry and Associates formed 2002 Gehry Technologies(GT) [9] to provide integrated, digitally driven constructionsand methodologies for the building industries. Frank Gehrystarts projects by sketching and manipulating physical models.Using inverse engineering physical models are translated intoCatia and projects are controlled and manufactured usingcomputer-generated construction plans. At GT it is knownwhat it will be, how it will be made and who will build it rightfrom the beginning of the project. Teams of architects,engineers, and consultants work together in the same Catiadatabase. The accuracy of the information and the eliminationof middlemen reduce everyone’s cost and risk, and make nonstandard objects buildable. Gehry Technology is serviceablefor big project teams working with the same database. Thisoversized technology is not useful in the case of standardarchitectural practice.The whole projects were geometrically well elaborated andthis enabled their realization within a digital chain process(from CAD to CAM). All three of them are very different indesign and building strategies but they show the advantages ofusing parametric design methods.VI. GENERATIVE ALGORITHMSGenerative programming is a style of computerprogramming that uses automated source code creationthrough generic frames, classes, prototypes, templates, aspects,and code generators to improve programmer productivity. It isoften related to code-reuse topics such as component-basedsoftware engineering and product family engineering. In thefield of architecture such editors are tightly integrated withmodeling tools that require no knowledge of programming orscripting, but still allow designers to build form generatorsfrom the simple to the awe-inspiring [12].In order to explain the concept of generative algorithms inarchitecture, let us remind ourselves of the conventionalmethod of digital design. Digital modeling involves thedefinition of spatial elements (solid or plane/surface), theirtransformation and modification. Each change in the designleads to modifications in the geometry, making it extremelycomplicated to intervene on every single element, which isdirectly interdependent with the other elements. With any suchchanges it is necessary to adapt, scale and reorient eachindividual element, which is very time consuming.Generally speaking, two basic principles may be singled outwhen it comes to this type of design process. The firstprinciple is associated modeling, i.e. the synthetic building of astructure based on the hierarchical functioning of objects andtheir interdependencies. The second is the generative principle,where one solution is selected out of many 3-D spatialconfigurations offered representing the optimal configuration.The selection criterion for the optimal configuration may betechnical or aesthetic.It is precisely these two basic principles of conceptual12design that may be described by means of mathematicalmodels and are contained in associated and generativemodeling.A. Associated modelingAssociated modeling refers to a method where elements areconnected in a fixed order, which produces a result creating abasis for building a new order. Let us draw a curve andquadrilaterals at its beginning and end whose dimensions willdepend on the curvature of the line at its initial and finalpoints. If we change the form and position of the curve, theassociated quadrilaterals will change their positions and sizes.This method of design extracts the required parameters fromthe designed structures and manipulates them using the rightalgorithms.B. Generative modelingInstead of drawing a structure, generative modeling usesnumbers as the input data. Designs are generated by means ofmathematical operations, dependencies and functions. Anystructure designed in this way contains a great number ofvariables within its internal structure, which may be used asthe next step in the design process. This kind of modelingallows maneuvering in the development and generation of thedesign which is not possible when using standard 3-Dmodeling tools.For example, let us take the range of integers 1-10 and use arandom number configurator to generate three differentnumbers representing the spatial coordinates of three distinctpoints in space. The generated spatial points define a NURBSgeometry. Every time the spatial coordinates of any of theinput points x, y or z change, the generated surfaceautomatically changes its geometry and adapts to the newvariables.C. Generative algorithms in architectural designModeling which uses associated and generative modeling iscalled generative algorithm modeling. This process has theterm algorithm in its name because objects are generated usingalgorithms in this type of design and their output for thefurther stages of design is also generated by means ofalgorithms. When it comes to architectural design,Grasshopper is one of the most commonly used generativedesign editors [13][16]. This editor is connected to Rhino 3-Dobjects and offers a range of mathematical tools for generativemodeling such as operators, conditional statements, functionsand trigonometric curves (Fig 4).Fig.4 Grasshopper mathematical operatorsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 2011There are operators from the branch of analytic geometryfor vectors, points and planes. The list and data management isa very important segment as it allows extensive databasemanipulation. In terms of advanced modeling options, it ispossible to use scripting in VB.NET, rhino. NET SDK (itallows access to OpenNURBS geometry) and C#.The operations and analysis of associated elements make itpossible to select from a number of options for NURBSgeometry and somewhat fewer options for mesh objects.D. Parametric urbanismContemporary urbanism tends to embrace a dynamics of thematerial and social process that are shaping contemporarycities [8][23]. It is based on form finding process organized bynetworks of interrelated systems. This novel paradigm andtheoretical ground determines the city form as dynamic, nonlinear and mostly parametric phenomena. However, theramification of these new paradigms and concepts and theirapplication in novel design and production tools for urbanismhave widely remained untheorised and have not been exercisedin practice.The foundation for application of general theory ofcomputing in urbanism is in the effort to formalize thedynamics of development of urban form as a procedure, asequence of logical steps. By shifting the focus from the mattertoward the organization of the system of urban form in general,the essence of this process will be determined as a set of rulesregardles of materiality of the phenomenon. This abstraction ofthe phenomena to a level of abstract organizational structureenables us to think of it as a complex system based on simple,locally determined rules.Parametric approach to urbanism addresses the ways inwhich associative design systems can control local dynamicinformation to effect and adjust larger urban life-processes byembedding intelligence into the formation, organization andperformance of urban spaces, uses, activities, interfaces,structures and infrastructures [25]. Built environment is thebiggest and most complex creation of mankind. Its complexityand vastness comes from a process of continous creation ofurban form not only as a physical objects but as a proces ofcreation of spatial, social an cultural relations. Dependance ofform creation process on these configurational aspects ofurban form determines the importance of understanding thesame. By this proces of transformation of preexisting conditionand creation of new order within the physical reality and newconfigurations of space social meaning and relevance is addedto an act of construction and form creation. With thisarchitecture becomes socially relevant and meaningful. Withthis system of architectural form becomes the spatio temporalmanifestations of configurational order realised througsphysical elements.With creation of a basic element of architectural form –spatial cell the elementary configurationally relation betweeninside and outside is created. Through process of additionmore discreet elements are created that generates complexconfigurations of physical and spatial structures.13These elements and their spatial relations and configurationof the system in general are represented through system ofcellular automata (Fig.5).Fig. 5 Cellular automata modelThe condition of each of the cells will be determined asresult of interaction and accumulation of different locallyembedded rules rather than by an exterior, order imposingcentre. In this model use of cellular automata is additionallyjustified with spatial and representational similarity betweenelements of urban form (buildings, lots, streets, squares andothers) and discrete cells as elements of the model [17].Furthermore condition of each of the elements of urban formthat is beyond its formal aspect (property rights, legal statusand others) can be represented with binary determinedcondition of the system of cells (Fig.6).Fig. 6 Cellular automata model of development of architectural formThe complexity of the system comes from a locally drivenset of simple rules that induce continuous adaptations andchanges on local level, but with an impact on the overallcondition of the system. It enables us to generate complex andnovel shapes and configurations as a result of a dynamic,nonlinear and locally driven morphogenetic process (Fig. 7).Fig. 7 Cellular automata model of development of urban form inresidential area in SkopjeINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 2011These new structures are more than a sum of their parts andare not predetermined or preconceived by any means. They area result of a historically embedded process of creation, whichis driven by locally conditioned simple rules and constrains.To breed new designs of the city form these rules need to bemanipulated and to contain principles of growth [1]. Theserules reflect a genetic code in that they orchestrate theresponse of the parameters and elements of the system (lines,surfaces, objects, cells or even a single attribute determinedentity) to the influence of diverse agents and conditions withinthe system, creating an emergent order. The result is surprisingin the way that final shape is a result of a bottom-up emergingorder and is dependent on sequences of random, interrelatedand local interactions.The digital tools used to model cities with parametricapproach and to generate different urban forms are widelyavailable as packages that use cellular automata, agent-basedmodels, associated or generative modeling and other systemsin digital urbanism. These are the tools that give us thepotential to understand, update and improve the process ofcreation of cities where non-standard methods coherent withthe nature of the phenomena of city can be conceived toconfront the banality of repetitive, arbitrary and predetermined form production on the city scale.The following case may serve as a quick explanation of howto use the generative algorithm method in urbanisms.Task definition: Generate a surface based on the giventopological coordinates and determine the optimal conditionsfor the location of the principal thoroughfare (the conditionsare technical: inclination and curvature by means of osculatingcircles). Based on the results define areas of different housingquality (conditions: proximity to thoroughfare, terraintopology). The urban structure was generated using thegraphical algorithm editor Grasshopper. The first step in themodeling process involved generating the topologicalcoordinates (x,y,z) which were used to create a NURBSgeometry of the terrain (Fig. 8).14The advantage of using the NURBS geometry incomparison with the mesh geometry lies in the fact thatsignificantly less data is used and the modification of theexistent geometry is simpler as uv parameters are used. At Fig.9, NURBS surface is defined with the set of points and uvvalue is extracted from the final form.Fig.9 Space coordinates and uv values of the pointsThis is possible because spatial coordinates are reduced toparameters located in the 0-1 domain- uv domain. Note: The zcoordinates of the points are scaled for the purpose of bettervisualization of the terrain morphology.The next step involves generating the horizontal contours.These contours are obtained as the given surface intersects theplanes running parallel to the xy plane. Depending on thecomplexity and intricacy of details in the terrain generated inthe further stages, various horizontal distances between thecontours are also defined by means of parameters. All thecontours are generated as a 3rd-order spline curve (Fig.10).Fig.10 Parametric definition of intersection plane and results fortwo intersection distancesFig.8 Surface definition with u,v parametarThe generated horizontal contours are used to determine theoptimal route location in relation to the position of the selectedcoordinates. All coordinates are associated to Rhino geometryand the proximity to the principal thoroughfare is analyzed,used to differentiate between different housing quality zones(Fig. 11 and Fig. 12).INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS

Issue 1, Volume 5, 201115technologies, thus contributing to the formation of a newaesthetics of digital architecture. On the one hand, technicalpossibilities open up new horizons in architecture, while on theother, they give rise to new issues related to the disciplines ofmathematics and geometry.ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work is supported by the Austrian Science Fond undergrand T440-N13 and COST Action TU0801.REFERENCES[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]Fig. 11 Visualization location of urban elements based on housingquality standards; parametrical and virtual model[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]Fig. 12 One of the infinite options in generating parametric design[18][19]VII. CONCLUSIONIn the age of digital parametric non-standard

parametric modeling with emphasis on two different groups of parametric software and presents the possibilities of generative algorithms in modeling architectural form and development of cities and urban design. Keywords—geometry, parametric design, generative algorithms urbanism, architectural design. I. INTRODUCTION

Related Documents:

parametric models of the system in terms of their input- output transformational properties. Furthermore, the non-parametric model may suggest specific modifications in the structure of the respective parametric model. This combined utility of parametric and non-parametric modeling methods is presented in the companion paper (part II).

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

Surface is partitioned into parametric patches: Watt Figure 6.25 Same ideas as parametric splines! Parametric Patches Each patch is defined by blending control points Same ideas as parametric curves! FvDFH Figure 11.44 Parametric Patches Point Q(u,v) on the patch is the tensor product of parametric curves defined by the control points

the design process. Parametric modeling is accomplished by identifying and creating the key features of the design with the aid of computer software. The design variables, described in the sketches and features, can be used to quickly modify/update the design. In Creo Parametric, the parametric part modeling process involves the following steps: 1.

Introduction to Creo Parametric 3.0 Advanced Modeling using Creo Parametric 3.0 Advanced Assembly Design using Creo Parametric 3.0 Introduction to Creo Simulate 3.0 Detailing using Creo Parametric 3.0 Surfacing using Creo Parametric 3.0 Sheetmetal using Creo

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for English Language Arts and Literacy 3 Grade 5 Language Standards [L]. 71 Resources for Implementing the Pre-K–5 Standards. 74 Range, Quality, and Complexity of Student Reading Pre-K–5 . 79 Qualitative Analysis of Literary Texts for Pre-K–5: A Continuum of Complexity. 80 Qualitative Analysis of Informational Texts for Pre-K–5: A .