Public Opinion Research Group

1y ago
12 Views
2 Downloads
2.12 MB
109 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Julius Prosser
Transcription

Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedWorld Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaFY 2016 Guatemala Country Opinion Survey ReportTHE WORLD BANK GROUPPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Opinion Research Group1December 2016

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaAcknowledgementsThe Guatemala Country Opinion Survey is part of the County Opinion Survey Program series ofthe World Bank Group. This report was prepared by the Public Opinion Research Group(PORG) team led by Sharon Felzer (Senior Communications Officer, Head of PORG), Jing Guo,Svetlana Markova, Jessica Cameron, Calita Woods, and Isabel Tepedino. Dania Mendoza andNoreen Wambui provided data support. The report was prepared under the overall guidance andsupervision of Sumir Lal (Director, ECRGP). PORG acknowledges the significant contributionfrom the Guatemala country team and the local fielding agency Aragón & Asociados. Inparticular, PORG is grateful for the support from Angels Maso (Communications Officer) whocoordinated the survey related activities from San Salvador, El Salvador.1

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaTable of ContentsI. Objectives .3II. Methodology .3III. Demographics of the Sample.4IV. General Issues Facing Guatemala .9V. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group .14VI. Sectoral Effectiveness.22VII. How the World Bank Group Operates .26VIII. World Bank Group’s Knowledge and Instruments .32IX. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Guatemala .36X. Communication and Outreach .39XI. Appendices .422

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaI. ObjectivesThis survey was designed to assist the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a betterunderstanding of how stakeholders in Guatemala perceive the WBG. The survey explored: General Issues Facing Guatemala Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group World Bank Group’s Effectiveness and Results The World Bank Group’s Knowledge Work and Activities Working with the World Bank Group The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Guatemala Communication and Information Sharing Background InformationII. MethodologyFrom March to April 2016, 367 stakeholders of the WBG in Guatemala were invited to providetheir opinions on the WBG’s work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey.Participants were drawn from the Office of the President, Prime Minister; office of a minister;office of a parliamentarian; ministries/ministerial departments/implementation agencies; ProjectManagement Units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of WBG projects;consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; local governments;bilateral/multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financialsector/private banks; NGOs/community based organizations; the media; independent governmentinstitutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; youth groups; academia/research institutes/thinktanks; the judiciary branch; and other organizations. A total of 279 stakeholders participated inthe survey (76% response rate).Some respondents received and returned the questionnaires via mail or email. Other respondentsfilled out the questionnaire with a representative from the independent fielding agency.Respondents were asked about: general issues facing Guatemala; their overall attitudes towardthe WBG; the WBG’s effectiveness and results; the WBG’s knowledge work and activities;working with the WBG; the WBG’s future role in Guatemala; and the WBG’s communicationand information sharing.Every country that engages in the Country Opinion Survey (COS) must include specific indicatorquestions that will be aggregated for the World Bank Group’s annual Corporate Scorecard.These questions are identified throughout the survey report.The results in this year’s Country Survey were compared to those in the Country Surveyconducted in FY’13 (response rate was 69%, N 62). Data were weighted to reach the samestakeholder composition in two years, which allows for year comparisons. Stakeholder groupswhich were not present in both fiscal years were not included in the comparison. Respondentswho belonged to the “other” stakeholder category were not included either. As a result, meanratings, percentages of respondents, and the total number of respondents in both years areslightly different from those of the original data reported in the FY’13 COS report and the nonweighted data presented in appendices A, B, C, and E. For the weighted stakeholder breakdownand year comparison results, please refer to Appendix D (page 87).3

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIII. Demographics of the SampleCurrent Position For further analyses, respondents from the Office of the President/Prime Minister werecombined with respondents from the office of a minister; respondents from PMUs andconsultants were combined; respondents from the financial sector/private banks werecombined with those from private sector organizations; respondents from NGOs/CBOs,private foundations, faith based groups, and trade unions were combined in the “CSO”category; and the small number of respondents from the judiciary branch and otherorganizations were included in the “Other” category. There were no respondents fromyouth groups.Percentage of Respondents (N 272)Employee of a Ministry/MinisterialDepartment/Implementation Agency13%Academia/Research Institute/Think Tank13%NGO/Community-Based Organization12%Other10%Office of Minister8%Private Sector Organization8%Media7%Local Government Office or Staff6%Office of Parliamentarian6%Bilateral/ Multilateral Agency6%Independent Government Institution3%PMU /Consultant/Contractor2%Private Foundation1%1%Office of the President/Prime MinisterFaith-Based Group1%Judiciary Branch1%Financial Sector/Private Bank 1%Trade Union 1%“Which of the following best describes your current position?” (Respondents chose from a list.)4

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIII. Demographics of the Sample (continued)Area of Primary SpecializationPercentage of Respondents (N 272)Other29%Generalist (specialized in multiple sectors)11%Urban, rural, and social development8%Governance8%Education7%Health, nutrition, and population5%Macroeconomics and fiscal management5%Environment and natural resources4%Poverty4%Social protection and labor3%Trade and competitiveness3%Fragility, conflict and violence3%Finance and markets3%Transport and ICT3%Agriculture2%Gender1%Water1%Public-private partnerships 1%Jobs 1%Climate change 1%“Please identify the primary specialization of your work.” (Respondents chose from a list.)5

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIII. Demographics of the Sample (continued)Geographic Locations Most respondents were from Guatemala City, therefore geographic comparisons were notconducted.Percentage of Respondents (N 274)Quetzaltenando,2%Escuintla, 1%Cobán, 2%Ciudad deGuatemala,95%"Which best represents your geographic location?"(Respondents chose from a list.)Exposure to Agencies within the World Bank GroupPercentage of Respondents (N 228)The InternationalFinance Corporation(IFC), 8%Other, 11%The World Bank(IBRD), 81%"Which of the following agencies of the World Bank Group do you primarily engage with inGuatemala?" (Respondents chose from a list.)6

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIII. Demographics of the Sample (continued)Familiarity with the World Bank Group Respondents’ levels of familiarity with the WBG were significantly, strongly correlatedwith their ratings of the WBG’s overall effectiveness in Guatemala, and significantly,moderately correlated with the extent to which the WBG plays a relevant role indevelopment in Guatemala, and the extent to which the WBG contributes to the country’sdevelopment results.Mean Familiarity Rating123456All Stakeholder Groups7896.2Office of President/ Prime Minister/Minister7.0Academia/ Research Institute/ Think Tank6.8Bilateral/ Multilateral Agency6.8Independent Government Institution6.8Office of Parliamentarian6.8Employee of a Ministry/ PMU/ Consultant6.7Other6.3Local Government6.1Private Sector Organization/ FinancialSector/ Private Bank6.0MediaCSO5.34.9"How familiar are you with the work of the World Bank Group in Guatemala?"(1 - "Not familiar at all", 10 - "Extremely familiar")710

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIII. Demographics of the Sample (continued)Familiarity with the World Bank Group and other organizations Respondents were significantly less familiar with the WBG than the IDB. However, theywere significantly more familiar with the WBG than the Central American Bank forEconomic Integration and Latin American Development Bank.Mean Familiarity Rating12345World Bank Group (WBG)6786.2Inter-American Development Bank (IDB/BID)6.5Central American Bank for EconomicIntegration (CABEI/BCiE)5.6Latin American Development Bank (CAF)3.1"How familiar are you with the work of these organizations in Guatemala?"(1 - "Not familiar at all", 10 - "Extremely familiar")8910

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIV. General Issues Facing GuatemalaHeaded in the Right Direction Stakeholder groups: In this year’s Country Survey, respondents from the Office of thePresident/Prime Minister/Minister and independent government institutions weresignificantly more likely to indicate that Guatemala is headed in the right direction, whilerespondents from the media and academia were significantly less positive about theprospect of Guatemala.Percentage of Respondents (N 277)The right direction48%The wrong direction26%Not sure26%"In general, would you say that Guatemala is headed in .?"(Respondents chose from a list.)9

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIV. General Issues Facing Guatemala (continued)Development PriorityPercentage of Respondents (N 277)Public sector governance/reform41%Education39%Food security33%Poverty reduction25%Health19%Anti-corruption18%Job creation/employment17%Rural development17%Crime and violence11%Law and justice10%Economic growth10%Equality of opportunity9%Water and sanitation8%Climate change5%Gender equity4%Environmental sustainability4%Social protection4%Foreign direct investment3%Global/regional integration3%Private sector development3%"Listed below are a number of development priorities in Guatemala. Please identify which of the followingyou consider the most important development priorities in Guatemala. (Choose no more than THREE)"(Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined. Top 20 of 31 response options shown.)10

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIV. General Issues Facing Guatemala (continued)What Would Contribute Most to Reducing PovertyPercentage of Respondents (N 273)Education47%Rural development44%Job creation/employment24%Public sector governance/reform23%Economic growth21%Equality of opportunity19%Anti-corruption18%Food security14%Health13%Water and sanitation10%Crime and violence8%Social protection6%Law and justice6%Agricultural development5%Climate change5%Foreign direct investment5%Trade and exports4%Gender equity3%Environmental sustainability3%Transport3%"The World Bank Group has committed itself to two goals: ending extreme poverty by 2030 and boostingshared prosperity. Poverty reduction is a broad term that encompasses work in many different areas.Which THREE areas of development listed below do you believe would contribute most to reducing povertyin Guatemala? (Choose no more than THREE)"(Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined. Top 20 of 30 response options shown.)11

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIV. General Issues Facing Guatemala (continued)Factors Contributing to “Shared Prosperity”Percentage of Respondents (N 259)Education and training that better ensure jobopportunity40%Consistent economic growth33%Better opportunity for the poor who live in rural areas20%Greater equity of fiscal policy15%Greater access to health and nutrition for citizens15%Better entrepreneurial opportunities (i.e., to startsmall and medium sized businesses)14%Greater access to micro-finance for the poor12%A growing middle class8%Better quality public services8%Better employment opportunities for young people8%Greater voice and participation for citizens to helpensure greater accountability7%More reliable social safety net7%Better employment opportunities for womenOtherBetter opportunity for the poor who live in urbanareas5%4%2%"The World Bank Group’s “Shared Prosperity” goal captures two key elements, economic growth andequity. It will seek to foster income growth among the bottom 40 percent of a country’s population.Improvement in the Shared Prosperity Indicator requires growth and well-being of the less well-off. Whenthinking about the idea of “shared prosperity” in your country, which of the following TWO best illustratehow this would be achieved in Guatemala? (Choose no more than TWO)"(Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined.)12

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaIV. General Issues Facing Guatemala (continued)Gap between the Rich and the PoorNot a problem at Percentage of Respondents (N 268)all, 4%Don’t know, 1%A small problem,4%A moderately bigproblem, 25%A very bigproblem, 66%"Do you think the gap between the rich and the poor is a very big problem, a moderately bigproblem, a small problem, or not a problem at all in Guatemala.?"(Respondents chose from a list.)Global Climate ChangeNot too seriousproblem, 1%Percentage of Respondents (N 270)Not a problem, 1%A somewhat seriousproblem, 6%A very seriousproblem, 92%"In your view, is global climate change a very serious problem, somewhat serious, not tooserious, or not a problem.?" (Respondents chose from a list.)13

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank GroupAttributing Failed/Slow Reform EffortsPercentage of Respondents (N 266)Lack of/inadequate levels of capacity inGovernment34%The World Bank Group is not sensitive enough topolitical/social realities on the ground30%The Government works inefficiently28%Political pressures and obstacles28%There is not an adequate level of citizen/civilsociety participation28%Reforms are not well thought out in light ofcountry challenges19%Poor donor coordination9%The World Bank Group works too slowly6%The World Bank Group does not do adequatefollow through/follow-up6%Other3%"When World Bank Group assisted reform efforts fail or are slow to take place,which of the following would you attribute this to? (Choose no more than TWO)"(Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined.)14

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)As noted in the “Methodology” section, the indicator questions referred to throughout the surveyreport are questions that are asked in every country that engages in the Country Opinion Survey.These will be aggregated for the World Bank Group’s annual Corporate Scorecard.The World Bank Group’s Overall Effectiveness (Indicator Question) Respondents gave significantly higher ratings for the effectiveness of the WBG than thatof the Central American Bank for Economic Integration and Latin AmericanDevelopment Bank. Respondents gave statistically similar ratings for the effectiveness ofthe WBG and the IDB.Mean Effectiveness Rating1234567World Bank Group (WBG)6.4Inter-American Development Bank (IDB/BID)6.5Central American Bank for EconomicIntegration (CABEI/BCiE)89105.9Latin American Development Bank (CAF)4.1"Overall, please rate your impression of the effectiveness of these organizations in Guatemala ."(1 - "Not effective at all", 10 - "Very effective")15

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)Achieving Development Results (Indicator Question)Mean Rating123456All respondents789106.2"To what extent does the World Bank Group’s work help to achieve development resultsin Guatemala?" (1-"To no degree at all", 10-"To a very significant degree")WBG Staff PreparednessMean Rating123All Respondents456789107.2"To what extent do you believe the World Bank Group’s staff is well prepared (e.g., skills andknowledge) to help Guatemala solve its most complicated development challenges?"(1-"To no degree at all", 10-"To a very significant degree")16

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)The World Bank and the IFC Working Together Only those stakeholders who responded “Yes” to the question “Do your projects involveboth the World Bank and the IFC?” provided their views on the working relationshipbetween the World Bank and the IFC.Percentage of Respondents (N 31)Don't know, 23%The twoinstitutions workwell together, 35%The way the twoinstitutions worktogether needsimprovement, 42%“If your projects involved both the World Bank and the IFC, what was your view on the twoinstitutions working together in Guatemala?” (Respondents chose from a list.)(Note: No respondents believe that "the two institutions do not work well together.")17

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)Overall Ratings for Indicator Questions by Stakeholder Groups Stakeholder groups: Respondents from independent government institutions,ministries, PMUs and consultants/ contractors on WBG-supported projects had thehighest mean ratings for the aggregated responses to the twenty six COS indicatorquestions, whereas respondents from CSOs had significantly lower mean ratings.Responses for individual indicator questions by stakeholder groups can be found inAppendix B (see page 57). Collaboration: Respondents who collaborate with the WBG had significantly higheroverall ratings (6.8) for the twenty six COS indicator questions than respondents who donot collaborate with the institution (6.0).Mean Ratings123456All stakeholders7896.1Employee of a Ministry/ PMU/ Consultant7.1Independent Government Institution7.0Local Government6.5Other6.4Office of President/ Prime Minister/ Minister6.4Bilateral/ Multilateral Agency6.0Academia/ Research Institute/ Think Tank5.9Private Sector Organization/ Financial Sector/Private Bank5.8Office of Parliamentarian5.6Media5.6CSO5.3Mean Ratings for All Indicator Questions by Stakeholder Groups on a Scale from 1 to 101810

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)Greatest ValuePercentage of Respondents (N 266)Financial resources41%Policy advice, studies, analysesTechnical assistanceHelp to bring discipline/effective supervision toimplementation of investment projectsCapacity developmentData and statistics25%9%7%21%10%4% 7%Mobilizing third party financial resources 3%3%Linkage to non-Bank expertise (i.e., SouthSouth knowledge sharing)56%45%30%20%19%11%6%6%Donor %15%Greatest valueSecond greatest value 1%"When thinking about the World Bank Group’s role, which activity do you believe is of greatestVALUE and which activity is of second greatest value in Guatemala?"(Respondents chose from a list.)19

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)Most Effective Instruments in Reducing PovertyPercentage of Respondents (N 267)Investment lending52%Technical assistance37%Policy based lending/budget support to theGovernment27%Capacity development24%Knowledge products/services19%Multi-sectoral approaches12%Trust Fund managementDon’t knowOther9%4%2%“Which World Bank Group's instruments do you believe are the MOST effectivein reducing poverty in Guatemala? (Choose no more than TWO)”(Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined.)20

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaV. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (continued)Greatest WeaknessPercentage of Respondents (N 269)Too influenced by developed countries22%Not enough public disclosure of its work19%Imposing technocratic solutions without regard topolitical realities14%World Bank Group’s processes too complex14%Not adequately sensitive to political/social realitiesin GuatemalaIts advice and strategies do not lend themselves topractical problem solving13%12%Don’t know12%Not aligned with country priorities12%World Bank Group’s processes too slow11%Not willing to honestly criticize policies and reformefforts in the countryNot collaborating enough with stakeholders outsidethe Government10%9%Other6%Arrogant in its approach6%Not aligned with other donors’ work6%Staff too inaccessible4%Not exploring alternative policy options3%Not client focused3%The credibility of its knowledge/data 1%"Which of the following do you identify as the World Bank Group’s greatest WEAKNESSES in its work inGuatemala? (Choose no more than TWO)" (Respondents chose from a list. Responses combined.)21

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVI. Sectoral EffectivenessEffectiveness of WBG’s Support in Sectoral AreasMean Effectiveness Rating1234567Economic growth89107.1Public sector governance/reform6.8Trade and exports6.8Financial markets6.8Global/regional integration6.7Transport6.6Regulatory framework6.6Poverty reduction6.6Environmental sustainability6.6Foreign direct investment6.6Private sector development6.6Water and sanitation6.5Education6.5Rural development6.5Information and communications ood security6.4Climate change6.3Disaster management6.3Equality of opportunity6.3Law and justice6.3Agricultural development6.2Urban development6.2Gender equity6.2Natural resource management6.0Crime and violence5.8Job creation/employment5.7Social protection5.6Communicable/non-communicable diseases5.5"How EFFECTIVE do you believe the World Bank Group is in terms of the work it does in the followingareas of development in Guatemala?" (1-"Not effective at all", 10-"Very effective")22

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVI. Sectoral Effectiveness (continued)Effectiveness of WBG’s Support in Sectoral Areas: Collaboration1Mean Effectiveness Public sector governance/reformEconomic growthTrade and exportsTransportDisaster managementForeign direct investmentPoverty reductionPrivate sector developmentWater and sanitationEnergyRural developmentFood securityRegulatory frameworkEducationFinancial marketsUrban developmentEquality of opportunityEnvironmental sustainabilityAnti-corruptionHealthClimate changeGlobal/regional integrationInformation and communications technologyAgricultural developmentJob creation/employmentNatural resource managementLaw and justiceGender equity*Crime and violenceCommunicable/non-communicable diseasesSocial protection910Collaboratingwith the WBGNot collaboratingwith the WBG"How EFFECTIVE do you believe the World Bank Group is in terms of the work it does in the following areasof development in Guatemala?" (1-"Not effective at all", 10-"Very effective")(*Significantly different between collaborators and non-collaborators with the WBG)1Note in the Appendix on the sectoral effectiveness (Appendix A, page 43) that primarily informed stakeholdersresponded to this question. Respondents were given the option of “don’t know” if they did not have exposure to theWBG’s work in certain development areas.23

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVI. Sectoral Effectiveness (continued)Drivers of EffectivenessTo determine the key drivers of respondents’ ratings of the World Bank Group’s overalleffectiveness and ratings of its ability to help achieve development results in Guatemala,bivariate correlational analyses were conducted using respondents’ ratings of the thirty onespecific areas of effectiveness.Correlational analyses, however, are not able to tell us exactly what is causing respondents’ratings of the World Bank Group’s overall effectiveness or ratings of its ability to help achievedevelopment results. Rather, these analyses tell us that as ratings of effectiveness in one areaincrease, respondents’ ratings of the WBG’s overall effectiveness increase, or as ratings ofeffectiveness in one area increase, ratings of the WBG’s ability to help achieve developmentresults increase. Thus, it can be inferred that respondents’ perceptions of effectiveness in onespecific area are related to, or drive, respondents’ perceptions of the WBG’s overall effectivenessor perceptions of the WBG’s ability to help achieve development results. Overall Effectiveness: Those specific areas with the highest Pearson Product-Momentcorrelations were determined to be the most closely related to perceptions of the WBG’soverall effectiveness, suggesting that ratings of effectiveness in those specific areas aredrivers of perceptions of the WBG’s overall effectiveness in Guatemala. The areasdetermined to be key drivers from these analyses were: The WBG’s effectiveness at food security; The WBG’s effectiveness at health; and The WBG’s effectiveness at anti corruption. Achieving Development Results: Those specific areas with the highest Pearson ProductMoment correlations were determined to be the most closely related to perceptions of theWBG’s ability to help achieve development results in Guatemala, suggesting that ratingsof effectiveness in those specific areas are drivers of perceptions of the WBG’s ability tohelp achieve development results. The area determined to be key driver from theseanalyses was: The WBG’s effectiveness at health; The WBG’s effectiveness at information and communications technology; and The WBG’s effectiveness at poverty reduction.24

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVI. Sectoral Effectiveness (continued)The WBG Promoting Private Public PartnershipsMean Ratings123456All respondents789106.3"To what extent do you believe that the World Bank Group’s work helps to find solutions thatpromote private public partnerships in Guatemala?"(1-"to no degree at all", 10-"To a very significant degree")Helping the PoorestPercentage of Respondents (N 266)To a fullysufficientdegree,Don't know,6%13%To a somewhatsufficientdegree, 17%To a veryinsufficientdegree, 23%To a somewhatinsufficientdegree, 41%“To what extent do you believe that the World Bank Group's work and support help thepoorest in Guatemala?” (Respondents chose from a list.)25

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVII. How the World Bank Group OperatesThe World Bank Group’s Work in GuatemalaMean Level of Agreement123456Overall the World Bank Group currently plays arelevant role in development in Guatemala¹5.7The World Bank Group’s work is aligned withwhat I consider the development priorities forGuatemala¹5.678910"To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the World Bank Group’swork in Guatemala?" (1-"Strongly disagree", 10-"Strongly agree")¹Indicator QuestionThe World Bank Group’s Work in Guatemala: CollaborationMean Level of Agreement12The World Bank Group’s work is aligned withwhat I consider the development priorities forGuatemala*¹3456789106.45.66.3Overall the World Bank Group currently plays arelevant role in development in Guatemala¹5.6Collaborating with the WBGNot collaborating with the WBG"To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the World Bank Group’swork in Guatemala?" (1-"Strongly disagree", 10-"Strongly agree")(*Significantly different between collaborators and non-collaborators with the WBG)¹Indicator Question26

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVII. How the World Bank Group Operates (continued)Overall PerceptionsMean Level of Agreement12345678Working with the World Bank Group increasesGuatemala's institutional capacity6.8The World Bank Group effectively monitors andevaluates the projects and programs it supports6.8Where country systems are adequate, the WorldBank Group makes appropriate use of them¹6.8The World Bank Group’s “Safeguard Policy”requirements are reasonable6.7The World Bank Group provides effectiveimplementation support (i.e., supervision ofprojects)6.7The World Bank Group’s approvals and reviewsare done in a timely fashion6.4The World Bank Group’s conditions on itslending are reasonable6.3The World Bank Group disburses funds promptly6.0The World Bank Group takes decisions quickly inGuatemala¹5.9"To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements?"(1-"Strongly disagree", 10-"Strongly agree")¹Indicator Question27910

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: GuatemalaVII. How the World Bank Group Operates (continued)Overall Perceptions: CollaborationMean Level of Agreement1The World Bank Group effectively monitors andevaluates the projects and programs it supports23456787.36.7Working with the World Bank Group increasesGuatemala’s institutional capacity7.36.7Where country systems are adequate, the WorldBank Group makes appropriate use of them¹7.36.7The World Bank Group’s conditions on its lending arereasonable*7.16.1The World Bank Group provides effectiveimplementation support7.16.6The World Bank Gro

World Bank Group Country Opinion Survey 2016: Guatemala Acknowledgements The Guatemala Country Opinion Survey is part of the County Opinion Survey Program series of the World Bank Group. This report was prepared by the Public Opinion Research Group (PORG) team led by Sharon Felzer (Senior Communications Officer, Head of PORG), Jing Guo,

Related Documents:

Japan-China Public Opinion Survey 2020 In Cooperation With: Japan: Public Opinion Research Center China: The China International Publishing Group (CIPG), Horizon Research Consultancy Group November, 2020 The Genron NPO . The Genron NPO 2020 THE 16TH JAPAN-CHINA PUBLIC OPINION POLL 2

Japan-China Public Opinion Survey 2019 In Cooperation With: Japan: Public Opinion Research Center China: Horizon Research Consultancy Group October, 2019 . intellectuals from the Horizon Research Consultancy Group's database, consisting of 45,000 people including business leaders, government officials, journalists, experts and public .

Opinion Research at IFES is a global program seeking to develop reliable and accurate opinion indicators. Results from IFES-sponsored surveys and focus group discussions are published in . entire set of Ukrainian data is from an IFES survey entitled "Public Opinion in Ukraine 1999. .

Japan: Public Opinion Research Center China: The China International Publishing Group (CIPG), Horizon Research Consultancy Group October, 2021 . In October 2021, The Genron NPO released the results of our 17th annual survey of public opinion in Japan and China, and one noteworthy result of the survey is the Chinese people's rapidly .

The University of Tehran Center for Public Opinion Research (UTCPOR) is an academic research institution dedicated to the study of public opinion in Iran and other countries. Since its inception, UTCPOR has been providing survey research and analysis services to a wide range of clients from the public, private, and nonprofit sectors.

American Association for Public Opinion Research and Oxford University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Public Opinion Quarterly. . according to a PIPA survey employing slightly different question wording, only a combined 25 percent of the public had either heard a great deal or some about .

[17:13 2/8/2007 4984-Donsbach-Ch01.tex] Paper: a4 Job No: 4984 Donsbach: Public Opinion Research (SAGE Handbook) Page: 7 7–24 PART I History, Philosophy of Public

Prosedur Akuntansi Hutang Jangka Pendek & Panjang BAGIAN PROYEK PENGEMBANGAN KUR IKULUM DIREKTORAT PENDIDIKAN MENENGAH KEJURUAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR DAN MENENGAH DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL 2003 Kode Modul: AK.26.E.6,7 . BAGIAN PROYEK PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM DIREKTORAT PENDIDIKAN MENENGAH KEJURUAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PENDIDIKAN DASAR DAN MENENGAH DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN .