Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Audit Report Adult . - Tennessee

1y ago
25 Views
2 Downloads
1,008.99 KB
105 Pages
Last View : 23d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Casen Newsome
Transcription

Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Audit ReportAdult Prisons & Jails InterimFinalDate of Interim Audit Report: February 25, 2021 N/AIf no Interim Audit Report, select N/ADate of Final Audit Report:August 11, 2021Auditor InformationName:Barbara Jo DenisonEmail:Company Name:Shamrock Consulting, LLCMailing Address:2617 Xavier Ave.Telephone:denisobj@sbcglobal.netCity, State, Zip:956-566-2578McAllen, TX 78504Date of Facility Visit:February 1-3, 2021Agency InformationCoreCivicName of Agency:Governing Authority or Parent Agency (If Applicable):Physical Address:Mailing Address:N/A5501 Virginia Way, Suite 110SAAThe Agency Is: MunicipalCity, State, Zip:Brentwood, TN 37027City, State, Zip:SAA Military Private for Profit Private not for Profit County State FederalAgency Website with PREA pe-elimination-act-of-2003-preaAgency Chief Executive OfficerName:Damon T. Hininger, President and Chief Executive :512-263-3000Agency-Wide PREA CoordinatorName:Eric S. Pierson, Senior Director, PREA Compliance and 615-263-6915PREA Coordinator Reports to:Number of Compliance Managers who report to the PREACoordinator:Steven Conry, Vice President,Operations/Administration65PREA Audit Report – V6.Page 1 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Facility InformationName of Facility:Trousdale Turner Correctional CenterPhysical Address: 140Macon WayMailing Address (if different from above):SAAThe Facility Is: MunicipalCity, State, Zip:Hartsville, TN 37074City, State, Zip:SAA Military Private for Profit Private not for Profit County State Federal Facility Type:Facility Website with PREA Information: /preaHas the facility been accredited within the past 3 years? Yes NoIf the facility has been accredited within the past 3 years, select the accrediting organization(s) – select all that apply (N/A ifthe facility has not been accredited within the past 3 years): ACA NCCHC CALEA Other (please name or describe: Click or tap here to enter text. N/AIf the facility has completed any internal or external audits other than those that resulted in accreditation, please describe:Click or tap here to enter text.Warden/Jail Administrator/Sheriff/DirectorName:Email:Raymond 01Facility PREA Compliance ManagerName:Email:Vincent Vantell, Assistant Warden/Support -808-0403Facility Health Service Administrator N/AName:Email:Joshua Lyonsjoshua.lyonsTelephone:615-808-0511Facility CharacteristicsDesignated Facility Capacity:2672Current Population of Facility:2148PREA Audit Report – V6.Page 2 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Average daily population for the past 12 months:2347Has the facility been over capacity at any point in the past 12months? YesWhich population(s) does the facility hold? FemalesAge range of population:18-70 Average length of stay or time under supervision:633.67 daysFacility security levels/inmate custody levels:Minimum and Medium No MalesNumber of inmates admitted to facility during the past 12 months:767Number of inmates admitted to facility during the past 12 months whose length of stayin the facility was for 72 hours or more:767Number of inmates admitted to facility during the past 12 months whose length of stayin the facility was for 30 days or more:767 YesDoes the facility hold youthful inmates? NoNumber of youthful inmates held in the facility during the past 12 months: (N/A if thefacility never holds youthful inmates)Does the audited facility hold inmates for one or more other agencies (e.g. a Statecorrectional agency, U.S. Marshals Service, Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Immigration andCustoms Enforcement)?Select all other agencies for which the auditedfacility holds inmates: Select all that apply (N/A if theaudited facility does not hold inmates for any otheragency or agencies): Both Females and MalesClick or tap here to enter text. N/A Yes No Federal Bureau of Prisons U.S. Marshals Service U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Military branch State or Territorial correctional agency (Tennessee Dept. of Corrections) County correctional or detention agency Judicial district correctional or detention facility City or municipal correctional or detention facility (e.g. police lockup orcity jail) Private corrections or detention provider Other - please name or describe: Click or tap here to enter text. N/ANumber of staff currently employed by the facility who may have contact with inmates:317Number of staff hired by the facility during the past 12 months who may have contactwith inmates:277Number of contracts in the past 12 months for services with contractors who mayhave contact with inmates:2Number of individual contractors who have contact with inmates, currently authorizedto enter the facility:26Number of volunteers who have contact with inmates, currently authorized to enter thefacility:48PREA Audit Report – V6.Page 3 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Physical PlantNumber of buildings:Auditors should count all buildings that are part of the facility, whether inmates areformally allowed to enter them or not. In situations where temporary structures havebeen erected (e.g., tents) the auditor should use their discretion to determine whetherto include the structure in the overall count of buildings. As a general rule, if atemporary structure is regularly or routinely used to hold or house inmates, or if thetemporary structure is used to house or support operational functions for more than ashort period of time (e.g., an emergency situation), it should be included in the overallcount of buildings.12Number of inmate housing units:Enter 0 if the facility does not have discrete housing units. DOJ PREA Working GroupFAQ on the definition of a housing unit: How is a "housing unit" defined for thepurposes of the PREA Standards? The question has been raised in particular as itrelates to facilities that have adjacent or interconnected units. The most commonconcept of a housing unit is architectural. The generally agreed-upon definition is aspace that is enclosed by physical barriers accessed through one or more doors ofvarious types, including commercial-grade swing doors, steel sliding doors,interlocking sally port doors, etc. In addition to the primary entrance and exit,additional doors are often included to meet life safety codes. The unit containssleeping space, sanitary facilities (including toilets, lavatories, and showers), and adayroom or leisure space in differing configurations. Many facilities are designed withmodules or pods clustered around a control room. This multiple-pod design providesthe facility with certain staff efficiencies and economies of scale. At the same time, thedesign affords the flexibility to separately house inmates of differing security levels, orwho are grouped by some other operational or service scheme. Generally, the controlroom is enclosed by security glass, and in some cases, this allows inmates to see intoneighboring pods. However, observation from one unit to another is usually limited byangled site lines. In some cases, the facility has prevented this entirely by installingone-way glass. Both the architectural design and functional use of these multiple podsindicate that they are managed as distinct housing units.7Number of single cell housing units:7Number of multiple occupancy cell housing units:6Number of open bay/dorm housing units:1Number of segregation cells (for example, administrative, disciplinary, protectivecustody, etc.):360In housing units, does the facility maintain sight and sound separation betweenyouthful inmates and adult inmates? (N/A if the facility never holds youthful inmates) Yes NoDoes the facility have a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, orother monitoring technology (e.g. cameras, etc.)? Yes NoHas the facility installed or updated a video monitoring system, electronic surveillancesystem, or other monitoring technology in the past 12 months? Yes No N/AMedical and Mental Health Services and Forensic Medical ExamsAre medical services provided on-site? Yes NoAre mental health services provided on-site? Yes NoPREA Audit Report – V6.Page 4 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Where are sexual assault forensic medical exams provided?Select all that apply. On-site Local hospital/clinic Rape Crisis Center Other (please name or describe: Click or tap here to entertext.)InvestigationsCriminal InvestigationsNumber of investigators employed by the agency and/or facility who are responsiblefor conducting CRIMINAL investigations into allegations of sexual abuse or sexualharassment:1When the facility received allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment (whetherstaff-on-inmate or inmate-on-inmate), CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS are conducted by:Select all that apply. Facility investigators Agency investigators An external investigative entitySelect all external entities responsible for CRIMINALINVESTIGATIONS: Select all that apply (N/A if noexternal entities are responsible for criminalinvestigations) Local police department Local sheriff’s department State police A U.S. Department of Justice component Other (please name or describe: (Tennessee Dept. of Corrections OIC N/AAdministrative InvestigationsNumber of investigators employed by the agency and/or facility who are responsiblefor conducting ADMINISTRATIVE investigations into allegations of sexual abuse orsexual harassment?1When the facility receives allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment (whetherstaff-on-inmate or inmate-on-inmate), ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS areconducted by: Select all that apply Facility investigators Agency investigators An external investigative entitySelect all external entities responsible forADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS: Select all thatapply (N/A if no external entities are responsible foradministrative investigations)PREA Audit Report – V6. Local police department Local sheriff’s department State police A U.S. Department of Justice component Other (please name or describe: (Tennessee Dept. of Corrections – TDOC OIC N/APage 5 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Audit FindingsAudit Narrative (including Audit Methodology)The Trousdale Turner Correctional Center (TTCC) is a private prison owned and operated byCoreCivic. CoreCivic contracts with the Tennessee Department of Corrections (TDOC) tohouse their minimum and medium security adult male offenders. The facility is located at 140Macon Way in Hartsville, Tennessee.Pre-Onsite Audit PhasePre-onsite audit preparation included a thorough review of CoreCivic policy 14-2, SexualAbuse Prevention and Response, 13-79, Sexual Assault Response and policy 5-1, IncidentReporting, facility procedures, training curriculums, the Pre-Audit Questionnaire and supportingPREA-related documentation was provided by the facility to demonstrate compliance to thePREA standards. Also reviewed were the following Administrative Policies and Procedures ofthe State of Tennessee Department of Corrections:-502.06, Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Implementation, Education andCompliance;-502.06.1, Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Screening, Classification, andMonitoring-502.06.2, Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Allegations, Investigations and SexualAbuse Response-502.06.3, Medical, Behavioral Health, Victim Advocacy, and Community SupportServices for PREA Victims-301.04, Job Requirements-115.01, Standards for Volunteers and Coordination of Community Involvement-501.01, Inmate Grievance Procedures-107.04, Office of Investigations and Compliance-113.37, Gender Dysphoria, Transgender, Intersex, and Gender Non-Conforming-506.06, SearchesVincent Vantell, Assistant Warden/Services, designated as the facility’s PREA ComplianceManager, answered questions and provided additional information and documentation asrequested throughout the Pre-Onsite Audit Phase. There were ongoing telephoneconversations with the PREA Compliance Manager with discussions on the audit process,audit schedule and clarification and requests of additional documentation and information.The agency’s PREA Coordinator provided the PREA Compliance Manager with facility noticesin English and Spanish eight weeks prior to the onsite audit visit informing inmates of thescheduled audit date. Notices included my name and mailing address if inmates wished tosend me correspondence. Inmates were informed correspondence would remain confidential.The facility provided photos of the posted notices in locations with the date posted noted as8/2/20. Due to increased positive cases of COVID-19 of staff and inmates, the onsite auditPREA Audit Report – V6.Page 6 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

visit was postponed twice. Facility notices were revised both times to reflect the rescheduleddates. Correspondence was received from two inmates during this Pre-Onsite Audit Phase.The facility has a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Sexual Assault Centerlocated in Nashville, TN. The MOU expires in October 2020 and the facility is in the process ofrenewing the MOU. The Victim Advocate/SART Coordinator/PREA Advocate was contactedto confirm and review the terms of the MOU. She stated that inmates and employees canaccess the emotional support services they offer. The Sexual Assault Center provides a 24hour crisis hotline and the agency can also be reached by mail. The agency also offers victimsof sexual abuse who are released continuing services at their location, with the exception of avictim with a background of sexual violence. The Sexual Assault Center provides victimadvocacy services, but at the present time the hospital that provides forensic exams toresident victims of sexual abuse does not allow them to provide this service. In the past 12months, the agency has received six calls from inmates of the Trousdale Turner CorrectionalCenter, but many callers do not give specific facility information, so that number may behigher.The Trousdale Turner Correctional Center has an MOU with the Nashville General Hospital.The Medical League Exam Team Manager was contacted to confirm and review the terms ofthe MOU. She reported the hospital would not call the Sexual Assault Center to dispatch anadvocate in the event an inmate victim requested an advocate be present during the forensicexam procedure. She explained that the hospital has some concerns over the amount oftraining the advocates have and the possibility of it being a liability to the hospital. She stated,if requested an advocate would be provided by the hospital. CoreCivic’s Director, PREACompliance and Investigations shared the agency is pursuing an MOU with VanderbiltHospital. At this time a draft of the MOU is being reviewed by the Vanderbilt Hospital’s legalteam.On 11/30/20, information was received from the PREA Resource Center informing PREAAuditors that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the DOJ had granted PREA Auditors permissionto conduct documentation review remotely and specialized staff interviews virtually. Incoordination with the PREA Coordinator and the facility’s PREA Compliance Manager, arandom sample of inmate records, random employee human resource records, contractorhuman resource records, volunteer files and 15 investigative files were requested and werereviewed remotely.Twenty employee human resource files were requested to determine compliance with criminalbackground check requirements. The twenty employee files included five new hires, fivepromotions and five transfers within the past 12 months and five records of staff employed forgreater than five years. The review of records revealed criminal background checks are beingperformed as required by the agency policy and the PREA standards. All applicants,employees and unescorted contractors are asked about previous misconduct. The 14-2H, SelfDeclaration of Sexual Abuse/Sexual Harassment form (14-2H) is completed as part of thehiring process, when an employee is being considered for a promotion and annually. Therewere five 14-2 H forms that were not found in the files. The Human Resource Manager wasable to locate three of the forms from 2020. Missing was one 14-2H from 2018 and one from2019.PREA Audit Report – V6.Page 7 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

The same employee files were reviewed to determine compliance with the requirements ofstandard 115.31, Employee Training. Upon completion of training, employees, contractors andvolunteers sign a CoreCivic PREA Policy Acknowledgement and/or Training Acknowledgementform (14-2A) acknowledging that they have reviewed the agency 14-2 policy and havecompleted and understood the PREA training provided. In review of the training files ofemployees, there were sixteen 14-2A forms not found in the employee files. Those missingincluded 14-2A forms for 2018, 2019 and 2020. Due to this finding, the facility did not meetcompliance to the requirements of standard 115.31. The recommended corrective action tobring standard 115.31 into compliance is outlined in the narrative of standard 115.31.Volunteer training files are maintained by the Chaplain/Volunteer Coordinator. One volunteerfile was missing a 14-2A form for 2020. In correspondence with the Volunteer Coordinator, heexplained the volunteer was not due to complete volunteer training until January 2022 andreferenced TDOC policy, 115.01, Standards for Volunteers and Coordination of CommunityInvolvement. According to TDOC policy 115.01, page 3, section E-8, volunteers are required tocomplete volunteer training every year for the first three years and then once every three years.The Chaplain explained during interview that he holds volunteer training sessions twice a year.In interview with two volunteers who have been providing religious services to inmates since thefacility opened, both stated they have attended volunteer training annually.The Learning and Development Manager maintains the training records for contractors. Inreview of six contractor files, there were ten 14-2A forms (2018, 2019, 2020) missing. TheLearning and Development Manager was able to locate five of the missing contractor 14-2Aforms. Due to the lack of documentation of PREA training for contractors, the facility did notmeet compliance to all provisions of standard 115.32. The recommended corrective action planto bring standard 115.32 into compliance is outlined in the narrative of standard 115.32.In review of medical contractor files and in a Not Met Report forwarded by the Learning andDevelopment Manager, there are eight healthcare workers who have not completed specializedtraining required for medical and mental health employees in standard 115.35. In interview withthe Health Services Administrator, he reported healthcare staff have completed training. Followup was made with the Learning and Development Manager who stated healthcare staff havecompleted specialized training and that one LPN completed the training, but needed to sign offto get credit for the course. Follow-up will be made with the Learning and DevelopmentManager during the onsite audit visit.Thirty random inmate records were requested to include sexual abuse screenings and mentalhealth referrals from screenings. The records were reviewed to determine compliance withscreening procedures. Additionally, documentation of PREA education was requested for thesame 30 inmates to determine compliance with the requirements of PREA education toinmates. The results of the review of screening information initially showed there were 17thirty-day reassessments missing. This information was forwarded to the facility andrequested these files be reviewed in an attempt to locate this information. The ChiefCounselor, and the agency’s PREA Coordinator responded that any inmates assigned to thefacility in 2016 and 2017 would not have 30-day reassessments as this process was identifiedPREA Audit Report – V6.Page 8 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

as a deficiency in the facility’s initial PREA audit in 2017. A corrective action plan wasrecommended and completed following that finding with the facility meeting compliance to allprovisions of standard 115.41 in 2017 upon completion of the corrective action plan. Therewere 10 records reviewed of inmates assigned to the facility in 2016 and 2017. Five of thoseinmates did not have initial screenings or 30-day reassessments. The remaining sevenrecords reviewed showed six inmates assigned to the facility in 2018, 2019 or 2020, did nothave 30-day reassessments and one inmate had a 30-day reassessment, but it was completed44 days after the inmate’s arrival date. The facility was found to not meet compliance toprovision 115.41(f) of standard 115.41.Three inmate records reviewed of inmates who alleged sexual abuse within the last 12 monthswere not rescreened following their report of an allegation of sexual abuse as required inprovision 115.41(g) of standard 115.41. In review of 11 investigative files of allegations ofsexual abuse, only one alleged victim was rescreened following a report of sexual abuse. Thefacility was found to not meet compliance to provisions 115.41(f) and 115.41(g) of standard115.41. A recommended corrective action plan is outlined in the narrative section of standard115.41.The facility was found non-compliant in provision 115.42 (c) of standard 115.42. The facility isnot following TDOC policy requiring a multidisciplinary committee review transgender inmateswhen they are assigned to the Trousdale Turner Correction Center and every six months. Arecommended corrective action plan is outlined in the narrative of standard 115.42.Thirteen of the inmate records reviewed revealed the inmates were not referred to mentalhealth for an evaluation after disclosing prior sexual victimization or of previously perpetratingsexual abuse, as required in provisions 115.81(a) and 115.81(b) of standard 115.81. Thirteenof the 30 inmate records reviewed were of inmates who were screened to be at high risk forvictimization or abusiveness, but were not referred to mental health for an evaluation asrequired. The facility was found to not meet compliance to standard 115.81. A recommendedcorrective action plan is outlined in the narrative section of standard 115.81.In review of documentation of PREA education of the 30 random inmates, records showed allinmates received PREA information upon intake to the facility and signed an acknowledgementof receipt and understanding of the information provided to them. Inmates sign a TennesseeDepartment of Correction Orientation Acknowledgement form as part of the intake process. Bysigning the form inmates acknowledge completing the orientation process, receiving a copy ofthe Institutional Rules and Regulations, a copy of Specific Unit Rules and Regulations andprovided information on PREA. They also acknowledge by their signature they viewed thePREA video provided during Orientation and received additional PREA information. Frominterviews with the Classification Manager/Chief Counselor and the Intake Case Manager,orientation and the PREA video are not completed on the day of arrival, but completed whilethe inmates are housed in the intake pod. Clarification of this practice will be discussed duringthe onsite audit visit.PREA Audit Report – V6.Page 9 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

The facility has one Investigator responsible for conducting administrative investigations ofsexual abuse and sexual harassment. Since the last PREA audit, there were 102 PREAallegations reported and investigation. In the past 12 months, there were 35 allegationsreported. The breakdown of those allegations are as follows:NumberTypeDisposition10 – Unfounded11 – Unsubstantiated2 – Voided (recanted)1 - Ongoing4- Unsubstantiated1 – Unfounded1 – Voided (recanted)24Inmate-on-Inmate Sexual Abuse6Inmate-on-Inmate Sexual Harassment4Employee-on-Inmate Sexual Abuse1 – Unfounded3 – Substantiated1Employee-on-Inmate Sexual Harassment1 – UnsubstantiatedFifteen investigative files were selected to be reviewed. They included a random sample ofcases in each in the four allegation types listed above. There was some documentationmissing and communication was made with the Investigator and the Director, PREACompliance and Investigations for clarification of the administrative investigation proceduresand requirements. The issues found were identified and addressed at an earlier date. If anallegation appears to be criminal in nature, the allegation is referred to TDOC’s Office ofInvestigation and Compliance (OIC) and the Trousdale County Sheriff’s Department. In thepast 12 months, five allegations were referred to TDOC’s Office of Investigation andCompliance.Specialized staff, contractors and volunteers, for a total of 25, were selected to be interviewed.Virtual interviews were held on 1/13/21, 1/14/21 and 1/20/21, with the Quality AssuranceManager coordinating the interviews. The following is the Specialized Staff interviewcategories:Specialized Staff Interview CategoryContract MonitorChief of SecurityMedical StaffMental Health StaffHuman Resource ManagerLearning and Development ManagerPREA Audit Report – V6.Page 10 of 105InterviewsConducted111311Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Facility InvestigatorsIntake StaffStaff Responsible for Risk ScreeningsStaff Responsible for Unannounced PREA RoundsIncident Review Team MembersStaff Who Monitor for RetaliationFirst Responders (Non-Security)Volunteers (telephone interviews)Contractors (telephone interviews)112551322Total Specialized Staff Interviews Conducted Virtually30Agency HeadPREA Coordinator11Additional Specialized Staff Interviews at an Earlier Date2The Agency Head and the PREA Coordinator were interviewed by telephone at the beginningof this reaccreditation period. Random staff and interviews of the PREA Compliance Managerand the Warden will be conducted during the onsite audit visit.The PREA Compliance Manager provided lists of security staff scheduled to work during theonsite audit visit and the names of security staff who was a first responders to allegations ofsexual abuse. The PREA Compliance Manager also provided inmate housing rosters, lists ofinmates with special designations, inmates who screened to be victims and aggressors and alist of LGBTI inmates. From this information, a random sample of security staff and inmateswere selected to be interviewed.Onsite Audit PhaseThe PREA audit of the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center was conducted February 1-3,2021 by this DOJ Certified PREA Auditor. The facility’s initial PREA audit was in 2017. On thefirst day of the audit, an entrance meeting was held to discuss the audit schedule and auditprocess with the following persons attending:Raymond Byrd, WardenVincent Vantell, Assistant Warden/Support ServicesByron Ponds, Assistant Warden/OperationsRodney McCloud, Chief of SecurityShawn Warren, Assistant Chief of SecurityBlair Leibach, FSC ConsultantAmber Wood, InvestigatorTeri Carter, Quality Assurance ManagerKari Kaiser, Quality Assurance ManagerDana Thomas, Chief of Unit ManagementKendras Reed, Mental Health SpecialistLeah Miller, Clinical Nursing SupervisorPREA Audit Report – V6.Page 11 of 105Trousdale Turner Correctional Center

Peaches Poole, Human Resource ManagerPanthea Shannon, Learning and Development ManagerHeather Baltz, Director, PREA Compliance and InvestigationsEric Pierson, Senior Director, PREA Compliance and ProgramsA site review of the entire facility was conducted with the following with the following individualson the site review:Raymond Byrd, WardenByron Ponds, Assistant Warden/OperationsVincent Vantell, Assistant Warden/Support ServicesAmber Wood, InvestigatorKari Kaiser, Quality Assurance ManagerBlair Leibach, FSC ConsultantHeather Baltz, Director, PREA Compliance and InvestigationsEric Pierson, Senior Director, PREA Compliance and ProgramsDuring the site review the locations of cameras and mirrors, room layout, restrooms and theplacement of PREA posters and information was observed. Facility notices in English andSpanish provided during the Pre-Onsite Audit Phase were found displayed in numerouslocations throughout the facility with the date posted noted as 1/27/21. PREA reportinginformation was posted on bulletin boards in each housing pod, stenciled by the inmatetelephones and posted throughout the facility. The Ethics Line posters were found posted inareas visible to staff. Signs on entry doors of all pods reminds female staff to make oppositegender announcements when they enter the pod. This practice was observed during the sitereview with all females saying “female on the pod” when they entered. In interview of 47inmates, 15 inmates reported females do not announce their presence when they enter theirpod and one reported they do not always announce. One Correctional Officer interviewedreported females do not announce. The facility was found to not meet compliance to provision115.15 (d) of standard 115.15. The recommended corrective action plan is outlined in thenarrative of 115.15.The telephone numbers for internal and external reporting were dialed on an inmate telephone.Inmates are informed in the Inmate Rules and Regulations Handbook and on postedinformation they can report allegations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment internally byspeed dialing *453 on an inmate telephone. When this number is dialed, e-mail alerts areimmediately transmitted to the Warden, Assistant Wardens, the Chiefs, Shift Supervisors andthe Investigator. When the number was dialed, the Investigator showed me the alert sheimmediately received when the call was placed. Inmates are informed they can remainanonymous if they wish to and do not have to use their pin number to cal

Reporting, facility procedures, training curriculums, the Pre-Audit Questionnaire and supporting PREA-related documentation was provided by the facility to demonstrate compliance to the PREA standards. Also reviewed were the following Administrative Policies and Procedures of the State of Tennessee Department of Corrections:

Related Documents:

1 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Audit Report Adult Prisons & Jails Interim Final Date of Report October 31, 2018 Auditor Information Name: Robert Manville Email: Robertmanville9@gmail.com Company Name: TrueCore Behavioral Solutions Mailing Address: 168 Dogwood Drive City, State, Zip: Milledgeville, Ga. 31061 Telephone: 912-486-0004 Date of Facility Visit: October 24-25-2018

This is MSYF’s second PREA audit since the implementation of the PREA standards on August 20, 2013. MSYF’s first PREA audit was conducted in February 2015. Audit Notices were posted throughout the facility in all areas where residents, staff, volunteers, contractors, and visitors to the facility could be

The Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), a federal law enacted in 2003, was created to eliminate sexual abuse in confinement. In addition to providing federal funding for research, programs, training, and technical assistance to address the issue, the legislation mandated the development of national standards. The National Prison Rape

PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS - PRISONS & JAILS Sec. 115.5 General definitions. 115.6 Definitions related to sexual abuse. Standards for Adult Prisons and Jails Prevention Planning 115.11 Zero tolerance of sexual abuse and sexual harassment; PREA coordinator. 115.12 Contracting with other entities for the confinement of inmates.

A Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) on-site audit of the U.S. Immigration and Enforcement (ICE) operated Broadview Service Staging Area (BSSA) was conducted on September 10-11, 2018 by Joseph W. Ehrhardt, certified PREA Auditor contracted through Creative Corrections, LLC of Beaumont, Texas. This was the first PREA audit for BSSA.

Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape (PREA standards), as required by PREA. The standards apply to adult prisons and jails, juvenile confinement facilities, police lock-ups, and community confinement facilities. The standards, which took effect on August 20, 2012, seek to pr

ent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape (PREA standards), as required by PREA. The stand ards apply to . adult prisons and jails, juvenile confinement facilities, police lock-ups, and comm unity confinement facilities. The P

Previous editions of this Standard were issued in 2003, 2012, and 2016. The 2019 edition of this Standard was approved by the American National Standards Institute as an American National Standard on December 4, 2019. v This is a preview of "ASME PVHO-2-2019". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.