FINAL MSK National Context

1y ago
28 Views
2 Downloads
4.29 MB
44 Pages
Last View : 28d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jewel Payne
Transcription

National Orthopaedic AllianceMusculoskeletal DiseaseNational ContextData in this presentation has been anonymised to allow it to be shared. For further information pleasecontact Ann Hoey, NOA Deputy Director via info.noa@nhs.netProfessor Peter Kay Hip and Knee Surgeon WWLNational Clinical Director MSK NHS EnglandPast President Hip Society and British Orthopaedic Association

MSK in the NHS England ( 7 -10bn)3-4th largest area of spend More years lived with MSK disability than any other disease 2nd cause of sever disability More time off work etc Not Kids, Cancer, Cardiac Is it a priority for payers? Under the Spot light Priority Economy ExpensiveVariationWaiting timesSocial care Work Benefits

Evidence-BasedInterventions: Response tothe public consultation andnext stepsPublished by NHS England in partnership with NHS ClinicalCommissioners, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, NHSImprovement and the National Institute for Health and CareExcellence

Carpal tunnel syndrome releaseThere was agreement to the inclusion of this proposal in the programme and general agreement to the clinicalcriteria, including from the British Society for Surgery of the Hand and the British Society for ClinicalNeurophysiology.We received requests for clarification which we responded to by: Adding information provided by the British Society for Surgery of the Hand andthe British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology.Amending the wording to reflect that while “service planning for themanagement of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome should include early access toneurophysiological testing the use of nerve conduction studies to diagnosecarpal tunnel syndrome” (clinician)., Nerve conduction should be carried outbefore surgery where possible as an aid to choosing appropriate treatment, forprognosis, and for reference in the event of a poor outcome.The British Society for Surgery of the Hand and the British Society of Clinical Neurophysiology approved thechanges to the recommendations and clinical criteria.

Where we are now Admitted Waiting ListEffective Use of Resource Procedures 23% of the Admitted waiting listNon EURBunionDupuytrensCarpal TunnelScopesTrigger FingerGanglionHyaluronic acid injections

Payment systemreform proposals for2019/20A joint publication byNHS England and NHS ImprovementOctober 20181.2 Our proposals . 51. 2.1 Duration of the tariff. 52. 2.2 A blended payment approach for emergency care. 53. 2.3 Outpatient attendances. 94. 2.4 Market forces factor .105. 2.5 Centralised procurement.116. 2.6 Maternity pathway.117. 2.7 Other payment reform proposals .13

What about MSK Not a central NHSE priorityStroke, Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Children Maternal, Cancer, Autism65% of CCGs and STPs say MSK is a priorityWhat have we got to help Internal knowledgeNice GuidanceRight CareGIRFTElective Care TransformationPublic HealthPersonalised CareAcademic health networksResearchHow do we decide what to put in place in a local healthcare economy?

PathwayPreventionPrevention Broadly egObesity, smokingPrevention: earlyReferral pathways todetection eg osteoprosis, appropriate secondaryfrailtycare (# or red flagsymptoms)InterventionReferral pathway toOperative Interventionconservative treatmente.g. physioOrthopaedics, Spinal,Rheumatology. Eg.Jointreplacement rates per100k populationGIRFTAdvice and guidance, MSKtriage services. First contactpractitionersHigh Impact Interventions, e.g.Osteoporosis, Back Pain, RheumatoidArthritis, Support FCP, Advice &Guidance, MSK Triage Services,Integrated Care Models, MedicinesOptimisation and Medicines ValueProgramme, Pain Managementprogrammes,Promote primary andsecondary prevention, workMSK Pathways, Falls Andin collaboration with PHE,Support FCP, MSK Triage,Fragility, Fraility,LA to address widerFCPPopulation appraochdeterminants of health andreduce inequalitiesCommissioning guidance:interventional Rx forbackpain, Hip arthroplasty,Knee arthroscoplasty andarthroscopy, shoulderdecompression.Choosing WiselyLifeCourse Approach, WiderNon-operative InterventionRevision, readmits, LOS,mortal, finance, litigation, hipimplant type, reducing smallno surgeons etcAdvice and guidance, MSK triage services. Firstcontact practitionersECTPRightCareProblem PresentsOutcomesSupport/ ResourcePROMsOtherOtherPROMsShared Decision Making,Reduce Inequalities in accessand outcomes, reduceunwarranted variationGIRFT Guidance, Trust DataPacks, Good Practice Manuals,Data Portal, Recommendations,Site Visit Report, Logic ModelsReduce referrals to secondarycare for MSK relatedconditions, ReduceMSK Handbooks, Evalutaion,Inequalities in access and Logic Modelsoutcomes, reduceunwarranted variationEmbed Shared DecisionMaking to ensure informedpatient choice andReport PROMs in focusappropriate referrals, ReducepacksInequalities in access andoutcomes, reduceunwarranted variationShared Decision MakingMSK Optimal Pathways, MSKFocus Packs, GP Practice packs,STP Packs, MSK Logic Models,Bespoke analytics, Storyboards,Case Books, Patient Stories,working with Spec Comm

reduce inequalitiesMSK Pathway Overview and Improvement Initiatives V4PreventionProblem PresentsPathwayChoosing WiselyPublic Health/GIRFTLocal AuthorityECTPSTP PrioritiesNHSI Op ProdRightCarePrevention Broadly egObesity, smokingLifeCourse Approach, WiderDeterminanants of health,reducing inequalities, riskfactors, Work & health,Health and WellbeingBoardsprogrammes,Commissioning guidance:Interventioninterventional Rx forPrevention: earlyReferral pathways to Referral pathway toOperativeInterventionbackpain, Hiparthroplasty, Non-operative Interventiondetection eg osteoprosis, appropriate secondary conservative treatmentKnee arthroscoplasty andfrailtycare (# or red flage.g. physioarthroscopy, shouldersymptoms)decompression.Orthopaedics, Spinal,Rheumatology. Eg.Jointreplacement rates per100k populationRevision, readmits, LOS,mortal, finance, litigation, hipimplant type, reducing smallno surgeons etcAdvice and guidance, MSKtriage services. First contactpractitionersAdvice and guidance, MSK triage services. Firstcontact practitionersPromote primary andsecondary prevention, workMSK Pathways, Falls Andin collaboration with PHE,Support FCP, MSK Triage,Fragility, Fraility,LA to address widerFCPPopulation appraochdeterminants of health andreduce inequalitiesTheatre productivityHigh Impact Interventions, e.g.Osteoporosis, Back Pain, RheumatoidArthritis, Support FCP, Advice &Guidance, MSK Triage Services,Integrated Care Models, MedicinesOptimisation and Medicines ValueProgramme, Pain Managementprogrammes,unwarranted variationOutcomesworking with Spec CommSupport/ ResourcePROMsOtherOtherPROMsShared Decision Making,Reduce Inequalities in accessPublicoutcomes,Health OutcomesandreduceFramework (PHOF)unwarrantedvariationGIRFT Guidance, Trust DataPacks,Good PracticeManuals,Joint StrategicNeeds Assessment,DataPortal,Recommendations,MSK ROITools,Knowledge andSiteVisit Report,IntelligenceHubs,Logic ModelsShared Decision MakingReduce referrals to secondarycare for MSK relatedconditions, ReduceMSK Handbooks, Evalutaion,Inequalities in access and Logic Modelsoutcomes, reduceunwarranted variationEmbedTBC Shared DecisionMaking to ensure informedpatient choice andReport PROMs in focusappropriate referrals, ReducepacksInequalities in access andoutcomes, reduceunwarranted variationTBCMSK Optimal Pathways, MSKFocus Packs, GP Practice packs,STP Packs, MSK Logic Models,Bespoke analytics, Storyboards,Case Books, Patient Stories,working with Spec Comm

“We must not use data like a drunkenman uses a lamp post: more forsupport than for illumination”.Understand data and collectively actupon it

Wave 1 - Elective Care Transformation Programme MSK handbooks: A SpotlightWave 1 Handbooks and Case Studies The handbook is a guide to ‘what, why and how’ ideascan be implemented locally to transform MSK servicesIt is informed by Wave 1 of rapid testing and includeearly outcomes and links to further evidenceThe case studies are more detailed accounts ofdifferent interventions and the learning from Wave mation/handbooks-and-case-studies/

Examples of Other Transformation Initiatives CCGs and STPs can use resources and learning developed by NHS England’s Elective Care TransformationProgramme to help address the steady rise in elective care referrals.High Impact Interventions - specifications2017 MSK triage Clinical Peer reviewHigh Impact Interventions - specifications2018/19 Ophthalmology First ContactPractitioner (MSK)Re-thinking referralsTransforming outpatients Advice and guidance services Patient-initiated, rapid access and virtual follow-up MSK triage and clinical review Telephone follow-up Standardised referraltemplatesSelf-management support Self-management education Self-management supportfor long term conditions Patient passportsAlerts to referring GPs using thee-RS when a local provider haslong waiting times for theservice their patient needs.The system suggestsalternative local providerswith shorter waiting times.

High Impact Intervention: MSK Triage What.§ MSK conditions affect 1 in 4 of the adult population, approximately 9.6 million adults in the UK.§ The NHS England RightCare programme has identified that 31% of total elective opportunitiesinvolve musculoskeletal pathways.§ Clinical triage services provide specialist clinical review of referrals after a GP has made areferral for a musculoskeletal condition.§ CCGs are delivering timely MSK triage with collaboration between clinicians in both primary andsecondary care and clear referral criteria.§ They are commonly delivered by NHS (hospital or community) or independent providers in acommunity setting.§ Referrals are often reviewed by physiotherapists, advanced physiotherapy practitioners, orGPwSIs who specialise in MSK conditions.

High impact intervention: MSK Triage (2) What § MSK triage is designed to drive establishment of specialist triage services so that patientsare seen by the right professional first time.§ It does not require an integrated triage and treatment service, although these can be bestpractice arrangements.§ The specification relates to all body parts and includes pain and rheumatological MSKrelated conditions.§ Exemptions will be defined locally e.g. urgent referrals for cancer.§ MSK triage services can reduce referrals to secondary care by up to 30%, with patientsoften seen in other community based services.§ This means that those patients who need to be seen by a hospital consultant are seen asquickly as possible.

High impact intervention: MSK Triage - Impact§ At the end of July 18, 90% of CCGs had rolled out MSK triage, withall others making significant progress.§ In order to articulate impact of the MSK triage the ECTP undertook animpact audit at the end of Q4 17/18. Provisional headlines:Ø Across all MSK triage schemes approximately 50% of all patientreferrals reviewed were diverted from secondary care.Ø Those CCGs that were compliant with the MSK triage specification bythe end of December 2017 had a significantly lower working dayadjusted referrals seen rate per 1,000 population at 9.7 compared tothose CCGs not compliant with the specification (11.3).Ø When comparing the same 2 month epoch from 16/17 to 17/18 thoseCCGs that were compliant with the MSK specification saw a 10%reduction in referrals compared to a 3% reduction in those that werenot compliant.

High impact intervention: First ContactPractitioner - a spotlight (1/3) What.§ The first contact practitioner (FCP) role should be situated at the beginning of the MSKpathway and considered part of the GP team. They should be the first point of contact forpatients and will be a real alternative to GPs for patients with MSK conditions.§ They will be providing new expertise and increased capacity to general practice andproviding patients with faster access to the right care.§ They are qualified autonomous clinical practitioners who are able to assess, diagnose, treatand discharge a person without a medical input§ All FCPs will demonstrate compliance with the Health Education England (HEE) and NHSECapability Framework§ Focusses on physiotherapists providing an FCP service in MSK care - where there is alreadya strong evidence base.

GM Networked Orthopaedic ServiceGM Networked Orthopaedic ServiceNetwork BoardMembership: Accountable Clinical Officer;Clinical Directors; Directorate Managers;Primary Care Practitioners; PatientRepresentativesGM Orthopaedic AllianceSupports the network in an operational deliveryrole as an advisory bodySuper-specialist centre (acts as Lead Provider –responsible for negotiations withcommissioners)Principles: Quality Standards Simplified commissioning Clinical leadership and common governance Surgeons to work at multiple sites Agreed research/innovation aims Coordinated training / recruitment Procurement at GM level MSK/Orthopaedics MDTsSpecialist centreJoint centreA&E / Local Hospital18

How should activity be coordinated?Unit typeSuper-specialistSpecialistJoint centresLocal hospitalsSuggested ‘baskets’ of activities Complex primary joint replacement Revision joint replacement for infection or complex revision Pelvic reconstruction Conditions requiring close multidisciplinary collaboration – e.g. inflammatoryarthritis, metastatic bone tumour, soft tissue sarcoma Primary elbows/ankles; uni-compartmental replacements; non-infectedrevisions; complex soft tissue / osteotomy High risk but non-complex activity – co-morbidities Conditions requiring close multidisciplinary collaboration – e.g. inflammatoryarthritis, primary and metastatic bone tumour, soft tissue sarcoma Specialist trauma Primary hips/knees/shoulders (non-complex) High volume procedures Arthroscopies (low complexity) Day surgery (23hr) Simple soft tissue Outpatient diagnostics and follow-up Injections Routine trauma Day case patient procedures19

Current activity55,408 T Oprocedures in2016/1720

Model configurationA&E / local hospital 10Joint centre 4Specialist centre 2Super-specialist centre 1

Quality Standards for GM – long-termNational Orthopaedic Alliancedefined domains:1. Primary care/secondary careinterface referral (add GM infoon social care interface)2. Pre-operative assessment(need to add info for GM on‘optimisation’)3. Efficient theatre utilisation4. Enhanced recovery (need to addspecific info for GM re: evening& weekend physio provision)5. Discharge process6. Patient outcomes andexperience7. Patient involvement shareddecision making8. Procedures of limited value9. Coding and costing)10. Referral to treatment timemanagement11. Safety12. Appraisal13. New procedures/minimumnumbers14. Procurement15. Commissioning16. Spines17. Hip and knee18. Sports knee19. Foot and ankle20. Upper limb21. Cancer (bone)22. Bone Infection23. Anaesthetics, peri-operativecare and enhanced recovery24. Pain services25. Rehabilitation26. Rheumatology27. Paediatrics28. TumourSuggested GM specific standards:29. Integration with community30. Transition services (adultservices ‘pulling in’)31. Mandate good data collection(coding) and systemresponsiveness32. Patient information33. Orthotic provision34. AHP services35. Consent36. Infection screen37. Ring fenced beds38. Standards for recruiting &training (theatre staff, juniordoctors, AHPs)

Priority Quality Standards – short-termNOA defined domains selected for priority review and adoption in GM1. Primary care/secondary care/social care interface referral2. Pre-operative assessment and optimisation3. Efficient theatre utilisation14. Procurement17. Hip and kneeGM authored domains selected for priority implementation37. Ring fenced beds

Standardised processes Linked with Theme 2 to create standardised referral templates across GM Recommended creation of ‘first contact’ physiotherapists/therapy services Aim is for patients to be discharged back to ‘first contact’ physios in ‘wraparound’service Supported by standardised enhanced recovery pathways in use by providers

Theatre Utilisation - GM Orthopaedicshas a 15% opportunityThere was a 15 percent opportunity across the elective orthopaedic operating lists undertaken during thecalendar year 2017. This suggests that, after a 5% tolerance for On-The-Day cancellations is applied, therewas a potential opportunity for an additional 5686 cases across the 16,954 elective sessions completed.

Opportunity by Trust908Trust A(5% Opp112 cases)304412234Trust B18% Opp854 cases)Trust C(27% Opp1550 cases)Trust D(28% Opp770 cases)Trust E(13% Opp282 cases)Trust F(12% Opp –610 cases)Trust G(7% Opp169 cases)Trust H(11% Opp1340 cases)There was a 15 percent opportunity across the elective orthopaedic operating lists undertaken across 8 trusts in Greater Manchester duringthe calendar year 2017. Trust A had the lowest opportunity at 5% (112 cases after 5% tolerance for On-The-Day cancellations) and Trust Dhad the highest opportunity as a percentage of throughput at 28% (770 cases), whereas Trust C had the greatest opportunity in total capacityto undertake additional operations (1550 cases after 5% tolerance).Nb. The number of additional cases (blue) reflects the opportunity before a tolerance for on-day cancellations is considered.

Downtime analysis by TrustTrustABCDEFGHTrustABCDEFGHTrustABCDEFGThere is significant variation in late starts with Trust G demonstrating best performance on starting ontime with an average 9 minutes late start compared to Trust D at an average 41 minutes. Trust D also hasthe greatest delays between cases when they happen, and the earliest finishes.H

Update on MSK ClinicalNetworks: Improving theatreefficiency and reducing variationin clinical practiceProfessor Peter Kay Hip and Knee SurgeonNational Clinical Director MSK NHS EnglandPast President Hip Society and British Orthopaedic Association

Conclusion You can’t consider theatre efficiency in isolation Provider – commissioner The Whole Pathway need to influence what comes in/goes out Individual theatre efficiency is the starting point Best use of what you have Use of data to benchmark individual units Rationalisation across units “a bigger foot print” Equipment Loan Kits, low volume specialisation Expertise and staff CCG, STP and regional considerations

Procurement Proposal for GM level value-based procurement approach drafted as part of thedesign of the new modelCategoryEstimated spend P/AEstimated potential savings P/AA.Procurement of implants – primary (assuming annual 8.5m – implants 425k - 850k (5-10%)volume of 7800) 37.5m other 900k- 2.8m (2.5-7.5%)pathway costs*B.C.Procurement of implants – Revision (assuming annual 1m 75k - 150k (5-10%)volume of circa 800 revision Hip/knee – cost data for 9m other pathway 225k - 675k (2.5-7.5%)other revisions unavailable)costs**Procurement of consumables (Cement, procedure packs, 1m 50 - 100k (5-10%) 400k 100k 240k 12k - 24k (5-10%)pulse lavage, “toga” gowns, drills/blades etc)D.Demand management/product selection – EG valueassessment of “Attune knee implant”E.Loan kitsF.Buyer/supplier efficiency savings – Purchase to pay 50kefficiencies, inventory management, theatre supportschedulingEstimated annual savings projection 1.8M - 4.8M

Identified areas for savingsIn opting for a primary supplier with 75% of activity rather than a sole provider,allows opportunities for innovation and a degree of clinical preference were totalconsensus cannot be achieved.The proposal is to develop and award a five-year contract for the supply of 75%activity to one supplier in the following lots: Lot 1: Primary hip and knee replacements (est. value 7.3m) Lot 2: Revision surgery (est. value 1.6m) Lot 3: Shoulder surgery (est. value 850k) Lot 4: Ankle surgery (est. value 234k) Lot 5: Elbow surgery (est. value 86K)Total annual contract value est. 10.1m (Data source - NJR)

Clinical Supply Chain Context & AnalysisOrthopaedics Primary Hip Arthroplasty North West

Regional Activity, % Cemented (Region)All Patients 70’sConfidentialSource: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) to date

Regional Supply Base (All Joint Reconstruction)Risks Monopolistic competition Tacit collusion Price InflationOpportunities Brand / productfragmentation Supply-chain & logisticsconsolidation Admin Consolidation

Regional Brand Fragmentation (Hip Stem & Cup)Source: PPIB Data CollectionConfidentialSome trusts are using numerous brands which leads to poorer outcomes and higher costs

Cumulative Revisions by brand CombinationCemented 480- 1100 ( 707)Cemented 480- 1100 ( 605)Cemented 480- 1100 ( 610)Hybrid 900- 1700 ( 821)Hybrid 700- 1700 ( 736)Hybrid 800- 2000 ( 823)Uncemented 1000- 2000 ( 1,205)Uncemented 1000- 2000 ( 1,365)High variety : Approx. 400 combinations where annual case volume is 1000

Cost Outcomes % UncementedSource: NJR / PPIB Data CollectionConfidential

Cost Range: Standardised Primary HipSource: PPIB Data CollectionConfidential

Relative Component Pricing (Primary Hip)Confidential

Opportunity (Primary Hips) 3.3M on 12M SpendConfidential

Developing Long Term Plan - 10 year Plan

Networks and a changing systemYou have to build it yourself“When you are done changing, you're done.”Benjamin Franklin

The Writing on the WallShared decisions with patients, workforce,Networking, benchmarking are the futureYou are not alone – MSK Support Network

National Clinical Director MSK NHS England . Stroke, Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Children Maternal, Cancer, Autism 65% of CCGs and STPs say MSK is a priority . RightCare Promote primary and secondary prevention, work in collaboration with PHE, LA to address wider

Related Documents:

SONOSITE X-PORTE MAIN FEATURES AT A GLANCE. Extreme Definition Imaging (XDI) substantially reduces visual clutter . L25xp: Arterial, Nerve, MSK, Venous HSL25xp: Arterial, MSK, Nerve, Venous HFL38xp: Arterial, Breast, MSK, Nerve, Small Parts, Venous C60xp: MSK, Nerve C35xp: MSK,N

MSK-135 consists of 3 x 45W solar panels connected in parallel and MSK-90 consists of 3x30W solar panels in parallel to form solar panel array. The kit can be folded neatly into a carrying case with handle, for easy stor-age while the kit is not in use. APPLICATIONS The kits are perfect for charging and maintaining any 12V battery system in the .

2 13 20 24 41 57 65 75 Radiology - Advanced Imaging Cardiology MSK- Pain MSK- Spine MSK- Joint Radiation Therapy Lab Managment Program Medical Oncology - Medicare

Final Exam Answers just a click away ECO 372 Final Exam ECO 561 Final Exam FIN 571 Final Exam FIN 571 Connect Problems FIN 575 Final Exam LAW 421 Final Exam ACC 291 Final Exam . LDR 531 Final Exam MKT 571 Final Exam QNT 561 Final Exam OPS 571

Keywords: Musculoskeletal, Pain, Survey, Global, Solomon Islands Background Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are common and the biggest global cause of physical disability [1]. A series of sys-tematic reviews on the prevalence of MSK pain that were conducted as part of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD)

Cluj-Napoca E CFR 1907 Cluj - AS Roma 20.45CET (21.45 Hora local) F Olympique de Marseille - Chelsea FC 20.45CET (20.45 Hora local) Stade Vélodrome, Marselha F MŠK Žilina - FC Spartak Moskva 20.45CET (20.45 Hora local) Štadión MŠK Žilina, Zilina G Real Madrid CF - AJ Auxerre 20.45CET (20.45 Hora local) Estadio Santiago Bernabéu, Madrid

amplitudes. Also called FFSK (fast frequency shift keying) when h 0.5 When h 0.5, MSK is FSK with cosinusoidal pulses is the data rate in bits/sec is peak frequency deviation the fm digital modulation constant or index R Δf R f h D º 2 MSK, GMSK- Minimum-Shift Keying these are a type of M 4 modul

weekend, your pet will be kept at the airport due to customs duty hours. If possible pets should arrive during weekday/daytime hours to prevent unnecessary stress for the pet or owner. Commercial Airline Transport . If flying commercially, contact the airline prior to purchasing tickets to ensure pets will actually be able to fly on the day of travel (e.g. ask about the airline’s regulations .