Message From The Governor And State Education Secretary
Message from the Governor andState Education SecretaryEach day, educators across the state seek to shape young minds, to inspire young hearts and to nurtureyoung leaders. We commend South Dakota’s educators - teachers, administrators, counselors and schoolworkers - for their dedication to the state’s youth. You should be proud of the work you do.It’s an exciting time for education in South Dakota. There is a renewed sense of energy in the field - thanksin part to the No Child Left Behind Act. The federal legislation has gone a long way in bringing educationissues to the forefront and creating a sense of urgency for improving the nation’s schools.As for South Dakota’s education system, it is in good shape overall. Granted, we have areas that needimprovement. The new 2010 Education Initiative, which you will hear more about in the coming months,will identify those areas that need work. It will provide a vision for our statewide education system as wellas a road map for reaching that vision by the year 2010.The following pages provide a snapshot of education in South Dakota. While we should be proud of theaccomplishments herein, we would be remiss to think that there are not challenges ahead.The Governor’s Office and Department of Education pledge to remain focused on finding innovative, yetpractical, solutions to improving our education system and our children’s future.Sincerely,M. Michael RoundsGovernorRick Melmer, Ed.D.Secretary of Education
Table of ContentsPutting Kids First.Year-End Highlights.Student Profile.Student Success.NCLB 2003.Schools and Personnel.Post Secondary Technical Institutes.Finances.Staff and Boards.1146911121314The 2003-04 Annual Report is dedicated toKaron Schaack. Over the course of 26 yearsof service to the Department of Education,Schaack earned the respect of South Dakota’seducation community, as a leader with acommitment and passion for quality schools.
South Dakota’s Department of Education aims to put kids first. In order to do that, we focus our effortson promoting leadership and service among administrators and educators, who touch the lives ofchildren on a daily basis. The department has identified seven goals for 2004-05 to ensure that SouthDakota students have the best educational opportunities available. They are as follows: Maintain high quality schoolsEnhance professional development for educatorsPrepare high school students for successful post-secondary educationYear-End HighlightsPutting Kids FirstCommunicate effectively with schools and familiesDevelop systems, standards for preschool educationInstitute regional Education Service AgenciesImprove Native American student achievementYear-End Highlights 2003-04Fast-paced and proactive describe department’s yearFast-paced and proactive describe the Department of Education’s year for 2003-04. During the past12 months, we established service-oriented regional agencies; outfitted public libraries with newcomputers; developed an assessment system for new teachers; and instituted a popular SummerReading Achievers Program for students. Some of the highlights are below.Bringing services closer to schoolsTo better serve South Dakota schools, theDepartment of Education established sevenregional Education Service Agencies acrossthe state. The agencies – housed at existingeducational cooperatives and Northern StateUniversity – will begin offering servicesin fall 2004. Education Service Agencieswill deliver assistance with curriculumalignment, professional development andschool improvement support. Locationsinclude: Hayti, Sioux Falls, Platte,Aberdeen, Isabel, Pierre and Rapid City.Advancing Native AmericaneducationThe department stepped up efforts toimprove Native American education inthe state. Under Gov. Rounds’ leadership,an advisory council specific to NativeAmerican education was created, andthe first-ever Indian education summitwas held. Plans are underwayto re-establish the state Officeof Indian Education within the Department ofEducation.Enhancing teacher leadershipGov. Mike Rounds and the Department ofEducation hosted the inaugural TeacherLeadership Conference. More than 475teachers representing schools statewidegathered to discuss strategies forimplementing No Child Left Behind Actrequirements. The agenda covered statestandards, state testing and assessmentsystems, the statewide accountabilitysystem, scientifically based instructionalstrategies, and requirements regardinghighly qualified teachers.Developing accountability forNCLBIn the spring of 2003, students in grades3-8 and 11 completed the new DakotaState Test of Educational Progress (STEP)assessment. The results provide a baselinefor measuring adequate yearly progressunder the No Child Left Behind Act.South Dakota’s schools fared well on thisfirst assessment – surpassing statewide goalsfor proficiency in reading and math for 2003. Ofthe 67,000 students who took the Dakota1
Year-End HighlightsSTEP, 71 percent were proficient or advancedin reading, and 59 percent were proficient oradvanced in math.its agriculture-education mobile laboratory and MidCentral Cooperative/Rapid City Central High Schoolfor a distance learning collaborative.Promoting summer reading as partof NCLBNAEP: Students rank in the top 10South Dakota was the only state in the nationselected to participate in the No Child LeftBehind Summer Reading Achievers Program.Participating sites were chosen based onthe presence of supportive communityand business groups and active schooldistrict leaders. The Summer ReadingAchievers Program aims to keep K-8students actively reading during thesummer months. More than 40,000students registered to participate.Attacking literacyissuesThe Department of Educationreceived a 14.5 million grantto fund its Reading First program.The initiative is designed to achievereading improvement in youngreaders. Over the next six years,the grant money will be used tohelp schools implement researchbased reading programs for K-3students and to provide professionaldevelopment opportunities, so thatteachers have the skills necessary toteach these programs. Nine schooldistricts (McLaughlin, Smee, WhiteRiver, Mitchell, Watertown, Pierre,Bennett County, Bon Homme andWagner) received funding throughthe program in 2003-04.Boosting career andtechnical education2Career and technical education got a 500,000 boost from the 2004 Legislature.These new dollars, distributed by theDepartment of Education, will supplementcareer and technical education at the highschool level, since many schools have cut theirprograms. The following projects receivedfunding: Western Dakota Technical Institute forFor the first time ever, South Dakota participated inthe National Assessment of Educational Progress,which measures student knowledge and skills incore academic subjects. Students’scores for 2002-03 – the most recentscores available – ranked among the top10 nationwide in reading and math. Inaddition, South Dakota students withdisabilities scored above the nationalaverage, as did students eligible forfree and reduced lunch. These aboveaverage NAEP results demonstrate ourstudents’ competitiveness at a nationallevel.Taking technology to theclassroomThe department’s final Technologyfor Teaching and Learning Academieswere held in summer 2003. More than1,290 teachers, administrators andpara-professionals received trainingin how to integrate technology intoeducation. Since the academies werestarted in 1997, the department hastrained more than 9,000 individuals,with 5,000 attending the four-weekbasic academy! Participants learnedeverything from basic computerapplications to Web authoring anddesktop publishing.Providing dollars to schoolsState aid to schools reached nearly 338.9 million for FY04. Schoolsstatewide benefited from these dollarsthat help support general education, specialeducation, alternative education, post-secondaryinstitutes, and technology in the schools. In additionto state aid, the department oversaw distribution ofmajor grants such as Title I and the National SchoolLunch Program to a tune of nearly 119.5 million.
Public libraries across South Dakota receivedone (or more) public access computers, thanksto the South Dakota State Library. As partof its mission to promote lifelong learning,the State Library applied for a grant from theBill and Melinda Gates Library Foundation.Implemented in 2003-04, the total dollar valueof the donated equipment, training and onsiteassistance exceeded 1 million. Additionalcomputers in local libraries allow more SouthDakota citizens access to the “informationsuperhighway.”Ensuring teacher qualityAn assessment system for new teachers inSouth Dakota took shape during theyear. In a series of meetingsspearheaded by theDepartment of Education,Educational TestingServices and educationprofessionals statewiderecommendedqualifying scores on39 Praxis content andpedagogy tests. Newteachers who pass acontent test demonstratetheir mastery of a subjectarea, ensuring that ourclassrooms are filled withknowledgeable, first-rateinstructors. The Boardof Education is slated toreview the recommended scores at its November2004 meeting.Promoting healthy schoolsTo promote healthy practices among youth, thedepartment introduced the Governor’s HealthySchool program. Schools that are leading the wayin health education and healthy practices will berecognized for their efforts. Top winners receive a 5,000 award for their school!Completing successful federalreviewsYear-End HighlightsEquipping local libraries withcomputersFederal reviewers completed comprehensiveevaluations of the department’s Title I and Perkinsprograms. Both were successful – a testimonyto the department’s strong accountability anddedication to serving the schools of this state.Federal reviews ensure accountability, quality andproper financial practices.Feeding kids a well-balanced dietDuring 2003-04, the department’s Childand Adult Nutrition Services helped toserve more than 17,000,000 nutritionallybalanced lunches throughthe National SchoolLunch Program.Many studentsreceived theirlunches freeor at a reducedcost. South Dakotaschools servedapproximately 31,181free lunches and8,933 reduced-pricelunches per day lastyear through thisprogram!3
Student Profile4Student ProfileEnrollment in South Dakota’s public K-12 schools declined 4.6 percent from 1999 to 2003. Neighboringstates such as Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, Nebraska and Wyoming also saw decreases inenrollment from 1996 to 2001, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. The state’s twolargest districts – Sioux Falls and Rapid City – accounted for 26.5 percent of public school students.K-12 Enrollment by District (Fall 2003)AberdeenAgar-Blunt-OnidaAlcester-HudsonAndes lle FourcheBennett CountyBeresfordBig Stone CityBisonBon HommeBonesteel-FairfaxBowdleBrandon sbardCusterDakota ValleyDe SmetDell RapidsDeubrookDeuelDolandDouglasDupreeEagle ButteEdgemontEdmunds CentralElk MountainElk Point-JeffersonElktonElm akonHamlinHansonHarding CountyHarrisburgHarroldHenryHerreidHill CityHitchcockHot oisIsabelJones CountyKadokaKimballLake Madison CentralMarionMcCook illerMitchellMobridgeMontroseMount VernonNew PlankintonPlattePollockPoloRapid on CountySioux FallsSioux ValleySissetonSmeeSouth ShoreSpearfishStanley CountyStickneySummitTea AreaTimber LakeTodd terWessingtonWessington SpringsWest CentralWhite LakeWhite RiverWillow 2262931196471873091
K-12 Enrollment 19992000Percent of Total Enrollment Percent of TotalEthnicEnrollment- Ethnic breakdownbreakdown2001200217, 052017, 042K-12 Demographic Profile (2003-04)17, 61630,00017, 666South Dakota’s attendancerate has stayed steady - at animpressive 95 percent - overthe last 10 years.The state’s dropout rate,which covers grades 7-12,was just 1.6 percent in 200203, the most recent year forwhich statistics are available.17, 576 Public150,000Students PrivateStudent ProfileAttendance andGraduation Rates2003YearPercentPercentofofTotalTotal EnrollmentEnrollment - Limited sh 1.78%Native ntEnrollment - Studentswith centofofTotalTotal EnrollmentEnrollment - Studentsfree le forfor free3 2 . 4%13.9%5
Student SuccessStudent SuccessSouth Dakota students routinely score better than the national average on tests that compare theirknowledge with students around the country. Supported by a dedicated, high-quality teaching force andaccess to the most up-to-date technology, our students enter post-secondary education or the workforcewith a solid start.ACT AssessmentA curriculum-based achievement test, the ACT is made up of four separate exams in English, reading,mathematics and science. South Dakota students who took the test in 2003 outperformed their peers inall four areas. Composite scores for the past five years are outlined below, as are individual scores for2003. The ACT is scored on a scale of 1 to 36, with 36 being the highest possible score.ACT Average Composite ScoreSouth onal21.021.021.020.820.82003 AverageACTScores:2003 AverageACTTestTest Scores:MathematicsMathematics2003 2003AverageScores:AverageACTACT TestTest Scores:EnglishEnglishSouth Dakota20.6South Dakota21.2National20.3National20.6051015202003 2003AverageACTScores:AverageACTTestTest 20252003 AverageACTTest2003 AverageACTTest Scores:Scores:ScienceScienceSouth Dakota002525South Dakota21.6National20.80510152025
Administered for the first time in South Dakota, the NAEP national standardized test measures whatstudents know in various subject areas. South Dakota’s scores ranked among the top 10 in the nation.More than 12,000 South Dakota students participated in the assessment between Jan. 27 and March 7,2003. NAEP scores range from 0 to 500, with 500 being the highest score.NAEPScaleScale Scores2003:NAEPScores2003Grade4ReadingGrade 4 ReadingSouth Dakota222NationalNAEPScale Scores2003:NAEPScaleScores2003Grade4Mathematics Grade 4 Mathematics2160South Dakota237National234050100150200Student SuccessNational Assessment of Educational Progress50100150200250250NAEPScores2003NAEP ScaleScale Scores2003:Grade 88ReadingGradeReadingSouth Dakota270National2610NAEPScale de 8 Mathematics50South 3007
Student SuccessStanford 10 AbbreviatedApproximately 73,000 students took the Stanford 10 AB, which compares our students to a nationalnorm. Results released in May 2004 show that South Dakota’s scores in every subject area improved orremained the same at every grade level, compared to 2003. The largest gains came in the lower grades,with the youngest students – grade 3 – moving up 8 percentile points in overall rank. Percentile rankscores range from 1 to 99, with 50 being the national average.Stanford 10 Abbreviated (State Averages 2003-04)Percentile RankGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade 65665462616563656162626363646667
In August 2003, the Department of Education posted its first-ever state Report Card, as required by theNo Child Left Behind Act. The Report Card identifies Dakota STEP assessment results, attendance/graduation rates, and teacher qualifications for the state, individual districts and schools. At the statelevel, South Dakota exceeded its goals for overall proficiency in both reading and math for 2003. 71% of all students were proficient or advanced in reading (2003 goal: 69%)59% of all students were proficient or advanced in math (2003 goal: 52%)17 schools were identified as “distinguished” under NCLBStudent SuccessNo Child Left Behind: 2003 Report Card32 schools – just 2.79% – were identified for “improvement” under NCLB; 199 were “on alert”*88.7% of classes were taught by highly qualified teachers (goal: 100% by 2006) “Improvement” status means two consecutive years of no adequate yearly progress, as identified under NCLB. “Alert”status means one year of no adequate yearly progress.Dakota STEP AssessmentThe Dakota STEP Assessment measures student progress on South Dakota’s content standards inreading and math. Students in grades 3-8 and 11 complete the test, which was administered for the firsttime in 2003.Math All Grades 2003NoChild Left Behind Math Scores 2003 - All StudentsNo Child Left Behind Math Scores 2003 - All StudentsBelow Basic %% NotTested2003 Goal (52.0% proficient & asic %Proficient %80%Advanced %Reading All Grades 2003No Child Left Behind Reading Scores 2003 - All StudentsNo Child Left Behind Reading Scores 2003 - All StudentsBelow Basic %% NotTested2003 Goal (69.0% proficient & asic %Proficient %90%Advanced %9
Student SuccessHelping schools implement NCLBThe federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 called for a dramatic overhaul of the nation’s educationalsystem. One of its major tenants is stronger accountability for results.In developing its statewide accountability system, the South Dakota Department of Education tookaggressive steps to develop a fair and clear-cut system - one based on research, conversations withpeople in the field, and thoughtful deliberation. The result - our state Accountability Workbook - wasapproved by the U.S. Department of Education on June 17, 2004.The Department of Education offers schools numerous resources related to NCLB, including:* school support teams to provide assistance to schools/districts to develop improvement plans* scientifically researched tools/resources to develop curriculum and instruction related to schoolimprovement* training for educators/administrators responsible for meeting adequate yearly progress goals* data retreats to promote data-based decision making* professional development opportunities to meet highly qualified teacher status and to improveinstruction* additional funds to Title I schools in improvement statusNCLB: Frequently asked questionsWhat is NCLB?The No Child Left Behind Act was signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002. Designed toimprove student achievement, NCLB is built on four main principles: accountability for results; anemphasis on doing what works based on scientific research; expanded parental options; and expandedlocal control and flexibility.What is the end result of NCLB?The goal of NCLB is that all students will be proficient in math and reading by the school year 2013-14.How is progress measured under NCLB?Under NCLB, states are to institute fair and effective annual tests for students in grades 3-8 and onein the high school grades. In South Dakota, we use the Dakota STEP test, administered to grades 3-8and 11. The results of this test help to determine if students are making progress in meeting the state’scontent standards. These results also identify areas that need attention. Annual measurable objectiveshave been set to ensure that South Dakota is on track to meet the goal of 100 percent proficiency by2013-14.What if a school or district does not show improvement?If a school or district does not show adequate improvement, they will receive extra help with planningand technical assistance. The South Dakota Department of Education can provide numerous resources.If a Title I school doesn’t meet its target for growth two years in a row, parents have a right to transfertheir child to another school within the district, and the district must pay for transportation.10Where can I find information on my school’s progress?Each year, the South Dakota Department of Education issues a State Report Card, which outlinesperformance at the school, district and state level. It’s available on the department’s Web site.
Schools and PersonnelNumber of Schools (2003-04)Public school districtsNon-public school systemsBIA school systemsMulti-districts & cooperativesCommunity-based service providersAlternative programs (stand alone)Special education schoolsSpecial populationsCorrectional facilitiesTOTAL172492017168542293PersonnelSouth Dakota had 172 public school districts in 2003-04, down from 178 a decade ago. Instructionalpositions made up the majority of school staff, and 60 percent of classroom teachers were ages 41 andup. South Dakota’s student-to-teacher ratio compares well with the national average, and classroomteachers continue to push our students to academic excellence.Teachers/Classroom Staff:FTEs per Age Range (2003-04)Age20-3031-4041-5051 FTEs1400.342173.562573.762962.49Percent of Total15.3723.8628.2532.52Staff Breakdown(2003-04 FTEs)3.4%Management StaffDOE’s distance learning keepsschools connected Staff BreakdownIn a state characterized by rural living,FTEs)distance learning continues to (2003-04providetremendous educational*Includesopportunities.Theguidance counselors, librarians,Department of Education leads speechthe chargepathologists, etc.in bringing the technology of the Digital**Includescustodians,Dakota Network to schools,businessesandsecretaries, cooks,school nurses, educational assistants, etc.communities across the state. Below is asnapshot of DDN programming in 2003-04. Nearly 625 teachers participated inprofessional development opportunitiesvia the DDN.More than 11,795 students statewideparticipated in classes, workshops orsimilar programming via the DDN.Nearly 77,200 videoconferences wereheld via the DDN, accounting for88,223 hours.40.6%Other chool ServiceSpecialists**Includes guidance counselors, librarians,speech pathologists, etc.**Includes custodians, secretaries, cooks,school nurses, educational assistants, etc.11
Technical InstitutesPost-Secondary Technical InstitutesWithin South Dakota, four school districts operate a technical institute. The South Dakota Board ofEducation is the policy-making board for these entities, while the Department of Education overseesareas such as instructor credentialing, program development and elimination, and financial managementof state and federal allocations.Lake Area Technical Institute, Watertown(605) 882-LATI or 1-800-657-4344http://lati.tec.sd.us/Southeast Technical Institute, Sioux Falls(605) 367-7624 or 1-800-247-0789http://www.southeasttech.comMitchell Technical Institute, Mitchell1-800-MTI-1969http://mti.tec.sd.us/Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City(605) 394-4034 or ondary Technical Institutes Enrollment (Fall)Post-Secondary Technical Institutes Enrollment (Fall) Full Time 32-020120-010020-009919-9998ProgramCompleters byProgram Completers byTechnical 610019417940032035209200Students5,500Part Time StudentsYearLake Area TI399Mitchell TI404Southeast TI667Western Dakota TI3221,792Total05001000StudentsNearly 82 percent of South Dakota’stechnical institute completers are employedin the state, demonstrating the tremendousimpact of technical education on state andlocal economies.1215002000
FinancesDepartment of Education Budget Breakdown (FY04)State AidState Aid to General EducationState Aid to Special EducationAlternative Education ProgramsNat’l Board Certified TeachersTechnology in SchoolsState Aid to Post-Secondary InstitutesTOTAL STATE AIDGrants Distributed (by DOE Office)General AdministrationCareer & Technical EducationCurriculum, Technology & AssessmentAccreditation & Teacher QualitySchool EnhancementEducational Services & Support 270,763,321 41,106,875 450,000 60,000 10,751,325 15,752,326 338,883,847 7,926,395 3,931,200 10,987,157 12,813,569 28,449,919(includes Child & Adult Nutrition) 55,104,930(includes Title I and Special Ed)State LibraryTOTAL GRANTS 280,911 119,494,081Operational BudgetGRAND TOTAL 18,117,599 476,495,527Department of EducationBudget Percentages(FY04)Per StudentAllocationPer StudentAllocationof GeneralStateof GeneralStateAid Aid 4,000FinancesFor fiscal year 2004, the Department of Education’s budget totaled nearly 476.5 million. A majority ofthese dollars flowed through the department to local school districts in the form of state aid or federalgrants. They covered items such as Title I programs, the National School Lunch program and aid toSpecial Education. The department’s operational budget accounted for just 3.8 percent of the total.Agency Budget3.80% 3,967.88 3,889.19YearGrants25.08%2004State Aid71.12%FY2003FY2001FYFY3,5002000 3,604.65Department of EducationBudget Percentages(FY04)2002 3,665.93FYDollars 3,802.3013
Staff & BoardsStaff & BoardsDepartment of Education Management TeamDr. Rick MelmerDeborah BarnettDr. Tammy BauckKris ConzetStacy KrusemarkDorothy LieglDiane LoweryWade PoganyJanet RickettsMelody SchoppGloria Smith-RockholdMary Stadick SmithSecretaryDeputy SecretaryDirector, Office of Curriculum, Technology & AssessmentGrant WriterDirector, Office of Finance & ManagementActing Director, Office of State LibraryNCLB CoordinatorDirector, Office of School EnhancementDirector, Office of Educational Services and SupportDirector, Office of Accreditation & Teacher QualityActing Director, Office of Career & Technical EducationCommunications DirectorBoard of Education MembersGlenna FoubergDr. Kelly Duncan-ClarkElmer BietzJack BroomeBarbara EveristDr. Richard GowenMarilyn HoytCarolyn J. MollersRoger PorchPresident, Aberdeen (expires 12/05)Vice President, Dakota Dunes (expires 12/04)Tripp (expires 12/04)Burke (expires 12/06)Sioux Falls (expires 12/07)Rapid City (expires 12/06)Huron (expires 12/05)Rapid City (expires 12/04)Philip (expires 12/07)State Library Board MembersKraig KeckRichard Van BeekDr. Eric AbrahamsonLinda DaugaardMichelle HowardJoe Van De RostyneWarren Wilson14Chair, Sioux Falls (expires 7/1/04)Vice Chair, Aberdeen (expires 7/1/06)Rapid City (expires 7/1/04)Garretson (expires 7/1/07)Brookings (expires 7/1/07)Aberdeen (expires 7/1/06)Vermillion (permanent member)
State Education Secretary . Table of Contents The 2003-04 Annual Report is dedicated to Karon Schaack. Over the course of 26 years of service to the Department of Education, Schaack earned the respect of South Dakota's education community, as a leader with a
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được
Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .
More than words-extreme You send me flying -amy winehouse Weather with you -crowded house Moving on and getting over- john mayer Something got me started . Uptown funk-bruno mars Here comes thé sun-the beatles The long And winding road .
