Consumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks 2019 - PassMark
Consumer Security Products PerformanceBenchmarks (Edition 2)Antivirus & Internet SecurityWindows 10November sumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks (Edition 2)M. Kankanige, D. WrenPassMark Software6 November 20182Consumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks 2019 Ed 2.docx
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareTable of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS. 2REVISION HISTORY. 3REFERENCES. 3EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4OVERALL SCORE . 5PRODUCTS AND VERSIONS . 6PERFORMANCE METRICS SUMMARY . 7TEST RESULTS . 11BENCHMARK 1 – BOOT TIME (SECONDS) . 11BENCHMARK 2 – SCAN TIME (SECONDS) . 12BENCHMARK 3 – USER INTERFACE LAUNCH TIME (MILLISECONDS) . 13BENCHMARK 4 – MEMORY USAGE DURING SYSTEM IDLE (MEGABYTES) . 14BENCHMARK 5 – MEMORY USAGE DURING INITIAL SCAN (MEGABYTES) . 15BENCHMARK 6 – BROWSE TIME (SECONDS). 16BENCHMARK 7 – EDGE LAUNCH TIME (MILLISECONDS) . 17BENCHMARK 8 – INSTALLATION TIME (SECONDS) . 18BENCHMARK 9 – INSTALLATION SIZE (MEGABYTES) . 19BENCHMARK 10 – FILE COPY, MOVE AND DELETE (SECONDS). 20BENCHMARK 11 – INSTALLATION OF THIRD PARTY APPLICATIONS (SECONDS) . 21BENCHMARK 12 – NETWORK THROUGHPUT (SECONDS) . 22BENCHMARK 13 – FILE FORMAT CONVERSION (SECONDS). 23BENCHMARK 14 – FILE COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION (SECONDS). 24BENCHMARK 15 – FILE DOWNLOAD (SECONDS) . 25BENCHMARK 16 – PE SCAN TIME (SECONDS) . 26BENCHMARK 17 – FILE COPY DISK TO DISK (SECONDS) . 27BENCHMARK 18 – FILE COPY OVER NETWORK (SECONDS) . 28BENCHMARK 19 – PCMARK 8 HOME SCORE . 29BENCHMARK 20 – WORD DOCUMENT LAUNCH AND OPEN TIME (MILLISECONDS) . 30BENCHMARK 21 – RUN EXCEL MACRO (SECONDS) . 31BENCHMARK 22 – SAVE WORD DOCUMENT TO PDF (SECONDS) . 32BENCHMARK 23 – USB 3.0 FILE COPY (SECONDS) . 33DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE . 34CONTACT DETAILS . 34APPENDIX 1 – TEST ENVIRONMENT . 35APPENDIX 2 – METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION . 36Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 2 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareRevision HistoryRevRevision HistoryDateEdition 1Initial version of report26 October 2018Edition 2Updated list of products6 November 2018ReferencesRef #1DocumentWhat Really Slows Windows Down (URL)Performance BenchmarkEdition 2AuthorO. Warner,The PC SpyDate2001-2018Page 3 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareExecutive SummaryPassMark Software conducted objective performance testing on fourteen (14) security products. This reportpresents our results and findings as a result of performance benchmark testing conducted on these products.For more details on which versions were tested, please see the section “Products and Versions”.Testing included twenty-three (23) performance metrics. These performance metrics are as follows: Boot Time; Scan Time; User Interface Launch Time; Memory Usage during System Idle; Memory Usage during Initial Scan; Browse Time; Edge Launch Time; Installation Time; Installation Size; File Copy, Move and Delete; Installation of Third Party Applications; Network Throughput; File Format Conversion; File Compression and Decompression; PE Scan Time; File Copy Disk to Disk; File Copy Over Network; File Download; PCMark 8 Home Score; Word Document Launch and Open Time; Run Excel Macro; Save Word Document as PDF; and USB 3.0 File Copy.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 4 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareOverall ScorePassMark Software assigned every product a score depending on its ranking in each metric compared to otherproducts in the same category.Security SoftwareIn the following table the highest possible score attainable is 322; in a hypothetical situation where a product hasattained first place in all 23 metrics. Internet Security products have been ranked by their overall scores:Product NamePerformance BenchmarkEdition 2Overall ScoreNorton Security260ESET Internet Security235Panda Dome196McAfee Total Protection187Kaspersky Internet Security184Windows Defender181Avira Internet Security174F-Secure SAFE165G Data Internet Security152AVG Internet Security147Avast Internet Security146Trend Micro Maximum Security131Trend Micro Internet Security127Bitdefender Internet Security116Page 5 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareProducts and VersionsThe names and versions of the fourteen security products tested are as follows:Product NameReleaseYearProduct VersionDate TestedNorton Security201822.16.0.247Oct 2018Panda Security SLPanda Internet Security201818.06.00Aug 2018AVG TechnologiesAVG Internet Security201818.5.3059July 2018McAfee Total Protection201816.0 R12Aug 2018F-Secure SAFE201817.4Aug 2018Avira Operations GmbHAvira Internet Security201815.0.42.11Oct 2018ESET, spol. s r.o.ESET Internet Security201811.2.49.0Jul 2018Trend Micro Inc.Trend Micro Internet Security201815.0.1163Oct 2018Trend Micro Inc.Trend Micro Maximum Security201815.0.1163Oct 2018G Data Internet Security201825.5.0.2Oct 2018Kaspersky Internet Security201819.0.0Aug 2018Avast Internet Security201818.5.2342Jul 2018Windows Defender20181.271.1100.0(Windows 1803)Jul 2018Bitdefender Internet Security201823.0.9.25Oct 2018ManufacturerSymantec CorporationIntel Security GroupF-Secure CorporationG Data Software AGKaspersky LabAvast SoftwareMicrosoft CorporationBitdefenderPerformance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 6 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwarePerformance Metrics SummaryWe have selected a set of objective metrics which provide a comprehensive and realistic indication of the areas inwhich a security product may impact system performance for end users. Our metrics test the impact of the securitysoftware on common tasks that end-users would perform on a daily basis.All of PassMark Software’s test methods can be replicated by third parties using the same environment to obtainsimilar benchmark results. Detailed descriptions of the methodologies used in our tests are available as “Appendix2 – Methodology Description” of this report.Benchmark 1 – Boot TimeThis metric measures the amount of time taken for the machine to boot into the operating system. Securitysoftware is generally launched at Windows startup, adding an additional amount of time and delaying the startupof the operating system. Shorter boot times indicate that the application has had less impact on the normaloperation of the machine.Benchmark 2 – Scan TimeAll security solutions have functionality designed to detect viruses and various other forms of malware by scanningfiles on the system. This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of clean files. Our sample fileset comprised a total file size of 982 MB and was made up of files that would typically be found on end-usermachines, such as media files, system files and Microsoft Office documents.Benchmark 3 – User Interface Launch TimeThis metric provides an objective indication as to how responsive a security product appears to the user, bymeasuring the amount of time it takes for the user interface of the security software to launch from Windows. Toallow for caching effects by the operating system, both the initial launch time and the subsequent launch timeswere measured. Our final result is an average of these two measurements.Benchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System IdleThis metric measures the amount of memory (RAM) used by the product while the machine and security softwareare in an idle state. The total memory usage was calculated by identifying all security software processes and theamount of memory used by each process.The amount of memory used while the machine is idle provides a good indication of the amount of systemresources being consumed by the security software on a permanent basis. Better performing products occupy lessmemory while the machine is idle.Benchmark 5 – Memory Usage during Initial ScanThis metric measures the amount of memory (RAM) used by the product during an initial security scan. The totalmemory usage was calculated by identifying all security software processes and the amount of memory used byeach process during the scan.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 7 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 6 – Browse TimeIt is common behavior for security products to scan data for malware as it is downloaded from the internet orintranet. This behavior may negatively impact browsing speed as products scan web content for malware. Thismetric measures the time taken to browse a set of popular internet sites to consecutively load from a local serverin a user’s browser window.Benchmark 7 – Edge Launch TimeThis metric is one of many methods to objectively measure how much a security product impacts on theresponsiveness of the system. This metric measures the amount of time it takes to launch the user interface ofMicrosoft Edge. To allow for caching effects by the operating system, both the initial launch time and thesubsequent launch times were measured. Our final result is an average of these two measurements.Benchmark 8 – Installation TimeThe speed and ease of the installation process will strongly influence the user’s first impression of the securitysoftware. This test measures the minimum installation time required by the security software to be fully functionaland ready for use by the end user. Lower installation times represent security products which are quicker for auser to install.Benchmark 9 – Installation SizeIn offering new features and functionality to users, security software products tend to increase in size with eachnew release. Although new technologies push the size limits of hard drives each year, the growing disk spacerequirements of common applications and the increasing popularity of large media files (such as movies, photosand music) ensure that a product's installation size will remain of interest to home users.This metric aims to measure a product’s total installation size. This metric is defined as the total disk spaceconsumed by all new files added during a product's installation.Benchmark 10 – File Copy, Move and DeleteThis metric measures the amount of time taken to move, copy and delete a sample set of files. The sample file setcontains several types of file formats that a Windows user would encounter in daily use. These formats includedocuments (e.g. Microsoft Office documents, Adobe PDF, Zip files, etc), media formats (e.g. images, movies andmusic) and system files (e.g. executables, libraries, etc).Benchmark 11 – Installing Third Party ApplicationsThis metric measures the amount of time taken to install and uninstall third party programs. The installation speedof third party applications may be impacted by security behavior such as heuristics or real time malware scanning.Benchmark 12 – Network ThroughputThe metric measures the amount of time taken to download a variety of files from a local server using theHyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which is the main protocol used on the web for browsing, linking and datatransfer. Files used in this test include file formats that users would typically download from the web, such asimages, archives, music files and movie files.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 8 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 13 – File Format ConversionThis test measures the amount of time taken to convert an MP3 file to a WAV and subsequently, convert the sameMP3 file to a WMA format.Benchmark 14 – File Compression and DecompressionThis metric measures the amount of time taken to compress and decompress different types of files. Files formatsused in this test included documents, movies and images.Benchmark 15 – File DownloadThis test measures the amount of time taken to download a set of setup files from a local server using theHyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP). The data set comprised a total file size of 290MB, and the formats usedinclude executables and Microsoft installation packages.Benchmark 16 – PE Scan TimeAll security solutions have functionality designed to detect viruses and various other forms of malware by scanningfiles on the system. This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of PE (Portable Executable)files. Our sample file set comprised a total file size of 2.03GB and consisted of .exe (329MB), .dll (920MB) and .sysfiles (827MB).Benchmark 17 – File Copy Disk to DiskThis test measures the amount of time taken to copy files between two local drives. The data set comprised a totalfile size of 5.44GB, and the formats used included documents, movies, images and executables.Benchmark 18 – File Copy Over NetworkThis test measures the amount of time taken to copy files from a local drive to a local server. The data setcomprised a total file size of 5.44GB, and the formats used included documents, movies, images and executables.Benchmark 19 – PCMark 8 Home ScoreThis test measures the overall performance as an overall score over a range of areas, including memory, video,gaming, music, communications, productivity and HDD performance.Benchmark 20– Word Document Launch and Open TimeThis metric measures how much security software impacts on the responsiveness and performance of the system.This metric measures the amount of time it takes to open a large, mixed media document with Microsoft Word.To allow for caching effects by the operating system, both the initial launch time and the subsequent launch timeswere measured. Our final result is an average of these two measurements.Benchmark 21 – Run Excel MacroThis test measures the amount of time taken to open an Excel document and run a macro to perform a range ofoperations. The test is run five times with a reboot in between each run. Our final result is taken as an average ofthese five measurements.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 9 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 22 – Save Word Document as PDFThis test measures the amount of time taken to open a large Word document and save it in PDF format. The testis run five times with a reboot in between each run. Our final result is taken as an average of these fivemeasurements.Benchmark 23 – USB 3.0 File CopyThis test measures the amount of time taken to copy files from a USB 3.0 drive to a local disk. The data setcomprised a total file size of 6.06GB, and the formats used included documents, movies, system files andexecutables.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 10 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareTest ResultsIn the following charts, we have highlighted the results we obtained for Norton Security in yellow. The averagehas also been highlighted in blue for ease of comparison.Benchmark 1 – Boot Time (seconds)The following chart compares the average time taken for the system to boot (from a sample of five fast boots) foreach Internet Security product tested. Products with lower boot times are considered better performing productsin this category.Norton Security8.2ESET Internet Security8.2McAfee Total Protection8.4F-Secure SAFE8.9Avast Internet Security8.9Panda Dome8.9G Data Internet Security9.1AVG Internet Security9.2Windows Defender9.9Average10.5Kaspersky Internet Security11.3Avira Internet Security12.8Bitdefender Internet Security13.5Trend Micro Maximum Security14.1Trend Micro Internet Security17.20sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 22s4s6s8s10 s12 s14 s16 s18 s20 sPage 11 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 2 – Scan Time (seconds)The following chart compares the average time taken to scan a set of 6159 files (totaling 982 MB) for each InternetSecurity product tested. This time is calculated by averaging the initial (Run 1) and subsequent (Runs 2-5) scantimes. Products with lower scan times are considered better performing products in this category.G Data Internet Security7Kaspersky Internet Security10Bitdefender Internet Security12Norton Security12ESET Internet Security19Panda Dome36Average41Trend Micro Internet Security42Trend Micro Maximum Security42AVG Internet Security44F-Secure SAFE45Avira Internet Security48Avast Internet Security62McAfee Total Protection66Windows Defender1490sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 220 s40 s60 s80 s100 s120 s140 s160 sPage 12 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 3 – User Interface Launch Time (milliseconds)The following chart compares the average time taken to launch a product’s user interface. Products with lowerlaunch times are considered better performing products in this category.Norton Security104Trend Micro Internet Security106Windows Defender106Kaspersky Internet Security112F-Secure SAFE116Trend Micro Maximum Security120Avira Internet SecurityESET Internet SecurityG Data Internet Security168229237Average343Avast Internet Security441AVG Internet Security481Panda Dome814Bitdefender Internet Security918McAfee Total Protection0 msPerformance BenchmarkEdition 21108200 ms400 ms600 ms800 ms1,000 ms1,200 msPage 13 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System Idle (megabytes)The following chart compares the average amount of RAM in use by an Internet Security product during a periodof system idle. This average is taken from a sample of ten memory snapshots taken at roughly 60 seconds apartafter reboot. Products with lower idle RAM usage are considered better performing products in this category.Windows Defender8.9G Data Internet Security22.7Norton Security39.1Panda Dome46.1ESET Internet Security100.0F-Secure SAFE100.7Kaspersky Internet Security108.1McAfee Total Protection153.0Average154.7Trend Micro Maximum Security191.7Trend Micro Internet Security205.2Avast Internet Security209.7AVG Internet Security218.4Avira Internet Security245.1Bitdefender Internet Security0 MBPerformance BenchmarkEdition 2666.8100 MB200 MB300 MB400 MB500 MB600 MB700 MB800 MBPage 14 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 5 – Memory Usage during Initial Scan (megabytes)The following chart compares the average amount of RAM in use by an Internet Security product during a scan.This average is taken from a sample of ten memory snapshots taken at roughly 12 seconds apart. Products withlower idle RAM usage are considered better performing products in this category.Windows Defender62.1ESET Internet Security139.7Kaspersky Internet Security160.6Panda Dome167.0Norton SecurityG Data Internet Security174.3296.5Trend Micro Internet Security328.0Trend Micro Maximum Security329.9AverageAvast Internet SecurityAVG Internet SecurityAvira Internet SecurityMcAfee Total ProtectionF-Secure SAFEBitdefender Internet Security0 MBPerformance BenchmarkEdition 2340.8383.9431.5451.9622.7631.0869.6100 MB 200 MB 300 MB 400 MB 500 MB 600 MB 700 MB 800 MB 900 MB 1,000 MBPage 15 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 6 – Browse Time (seconds)The following chart compares the average time taken for the default browser Microsoft Edge to successively loada set of popular websites through the local area network from a local server machine. Products with lower browsetimes are considered better performing products in this category. 1Norton Security10.8McAfee Total Protection10.9Panda Dome11.4Avira Internet Security11.9Windows Defender12.3Avast Internet Security13.6AVG Internet Security14.0Average14.2ESET Internet Security14.3Trend Micro Internet Security14.4Bitdefender Internet Security14.7Trend Micro Maximum Security15.4G Data Internet Security19.9F-Secure SAFE20.40s15s10 s15 s20 s25 sKaspersky Internet Security was excluded from this test as the test script was blocked by the application’s firewall.Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 16 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 7 – Edge Launch Time (milliseconds)The following chart compares the average launch times of the Microsoft Edge after rebooting the machine foreach Internet Security product we tested. Products with lower launch times are considered better performingproducts in this category.Windows Defender600Bitdefender Internet Security620ESET Internet Security649Norton Security668Panda Dome685McAfee Total Protection710Kaspersky Internet Security716F-Secure SAFE736G Data Internet Security745Avira Internet Security774AVG Internet Security785Average795Avast Internet Security846Trend Micro Maximum Security1141Trend Micro Internet Security0 msPerformance BenchmarkEdition 21328200 ms400 ms600 ms800 ms1,000 ms1,200 ms1,400 msPage 17 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 8 – Installation Time (seconds)The following chart compares the minimum time it takes for security products to be fully functional and ready foruse by the end user. Products with lower installation times are considered better performing products in thiscategory.2ESET Internet Security42Norton Security54F-Secure SAFE54AVG Internet Security58Panda Dome61Avast Internet Security62Avira Internet Security64Kaspersky Internet Security81Trend Micro Internet Security81Trend Micro Maximum Security85Bitdefender Internet Security104Average130McAfee Total Protection270G Data Internet Security7820s2100 s200 s300 s400 s500 s600 s700 s800 s900 sWindows Defender was excluded from this test as it is built in to Windows 10 (Does not require installation).Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 18 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 9 – Installation Size (megabytes)The following chart compares the total size of files added during the installation of security products. Productswith lower installation sizes are considered better performing products in this category. 3F-Secure SAFE173Panda DomeAvira Internet SecurityTrend Micro Maximum Security292599725ESET Internet Security752Kaspersky Internet Security805Average824Norton Security856AVG Internet Security917Avast Internet Security1001Trend Micro Internet Security1020McAfee Total Protection1049Bitdefender Internet Security1173G Data Internet Security0 MB32044500 MB1,000 MB1,500 MB2,000 MB2,500 MBWindows Defender was excluded from this test as it is built in to Windows 10 (Does not require installation).Performance BenchmarkEdition 2Page 19 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 10 – File Copy, Move and Delete (seconds)The following chart compares the average time taken to copy, move and delete several sets of sample files foreach Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products inthis category.McAfee Total Protection4.7Norton Security4.8Avast Internet Security5.1AVG Internet Security5.1Panda Dome5.3ESET Internet Security5.6G Data Internet Security6.8Trend Micro Internet Security6.9Trend Micro Maximum Security7.0Average7.0Kaspersky Internet Security7.5F-Secure SAFE8.5Avira Internet Security9.5Bitdefender Internet Security10.9Windows Defender12.70sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 22s4s6s8s10 s12 s14 sPage 20 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 11 – Installation of Third Party Applications (seconds)The following chart compares the average time taken to install 3 different third-party applications for each InternetSecurity product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.Windows Defender7.4F-Secure SAFE8.8Norton Security8.8ESET Internet Security10.3Panda Dome10.6Avast Internet Security10.7AVG Internet Security10.9Average12.7McAfee Total Protection13.1Bitdefender Internet Security13.3G Data Internet Security14.7Avira Internet Security16.4Trend Micro Internet Security16.4Kaspersky Internet Security16.4Trend Micro Maximum Security21.10sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 25s10 s15 s20 s25 sPage 21 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 12 – Network Throughput (seconds)The following chart compares the average time to download a sample set of common file types for each InternetSecurity product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.Avira Internet Security5.9Trend Micro Maximum Security6.3Windows Defender6.5ESET Internet Security6.6McAfee Total Protection6.8Trend Micro Internet Security7.0Panda Dome7.7Norton Security8.0AVG Internet Security8.3Avast Internet Security8.4Kaspersky Internet Security8.9Bitdefender Internet Security9.0Average15.1F-Secure SAFE16.4G Data Internet Security113.30sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 220 s40 s60 s80 s100 s120 sPage 22 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 13 – File Format Conversion (seconds)The following chart compares the average time it takes for five sample files to be converted from one file formatto another (MP3 WMA, MP3 WAV) for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times areconsidered better performing products in this category.Windows Defender52.7ESET Internet Security52.7G Data Internet Security52.9Avira Internet Security53.0Norton Security53.0Kaspersky Internet Security53.2McAfee Total Protection53.4Avast Internet Security53.5Panda Dome53.6Average53.7F-Secure SAFE54.0AVG Internet Security54.7Trend Micro Internet Security54.8Trend Micro Maximum Security54.9Bitdefender Internet Security55.251 sPerformance BenchmarkEdition 252 s52 s53 s53 s54 s54 s55 s55 s56 sPage 23 of 4712 November 2018
Consumer Security Performance Benchmarks 2018PassMark SoftwareBenchmark 14 – File Compression and Decompression (seconds)The following chart compares the average time it takes for sample files to be compressed and decompressed foreach Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products inthis category.McAfee Total Protection39.9Norton Security40.0F-Secure SAFE40.2Bitdefender Internet Security40.3Avast Internet Security40.4AVG Interne
Intel Security Group McAfee Total Protection 2018 16.0 R12 Aug 2018 F-Secure Corporation F-Secure SAFE 2018 17.4 Aug 2018 Avira Operations GmbH Avira Internet Security 2018 15.42.11 Oct 2018 ESET, spol. s r.o. ESET Internet Security 2018 11.2.49.0 Jul 2018 Trend Micro Inc. Trend Micro Internet Security 2018 15.0.1163 Oct 2018 .
The Center for Internet Security (CIS) has published benchmarks for Microsoft products and services including the Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365 Foundations Benchmarks, the Windows 10 Benchmark, and the Windows Server 2016 Benchmark. CIS benchmarks are internationally recognized as security standards for defending IT systems and data against
The Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) standard is a descriptive scale of language ability in English as a Second Language (ESL) written as 12 benchmarks or reference points along a continuum from basic to advanced. The CLB standard reflects the progression of the knowledge and skills that underlie basic, intermediate and advanced ability
Network Attached Storage VMs on NAS . 2/15/2013 Virtual Machine Workloads: The Case for New Benchmarks for NAS 10 VM-NAS I/O Stack . GPFS, WAFL, ZFS GPFS, WAFL, ZFS NAS Appliance Application NFS /SMB Current NAS Benchmarks New NAS Benchmarks Physical Machine
PassMark Software conducted objective performance testing on twelve (12) Internet Security software products and five (5) Total Security software products on Windows 7 Ultimate Edition (64-bit) SP1 between August 2014 and March 2015. This report presents our results and findings as a result of performance benchmark testing
Consumer Markets and Consumer Buying Behavior CB-2 Consumer Buying Behavior Consumer behavior is the actions a person takes in purchasing and using products and services, including the mental and social processes that precede and follow these actions Consumer Buying Behavior refers t
AVG Internet Security 9 ESET Smart Security 4 F-Secure Internet Security 2010 Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 McAfee Internet Security Microsoft Security Essentials Norman Security Suite Panda Internet Security 2011 Sunbelt VIPRE Antivirus Premium 4 Symantec Norton Internet Security 20
The Consumer Protection (Consumer Goods Safety Requirements) Regulations 2011 (CGSR) were introduced on 1 April 2011 to enhance consumer protection against unsafe general consumer goods. The CGSR covers general consumer goods which are not under the purview of other regulations or regulatory agencies in Singapore.
Archaeological illustration. [Cambridge manuals in archaeology] 930.1 ADKI Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 (2002 [printing]) Strier, Karen B. Primate behavioral ecology (Fifth edition.) 599.815 STRI London; New York: Routledge, 2017 Biology Biochemical Society (Great Britain), Estrela, Pedro Essays in biochemistry : volume 60, issue 1, Biosensor technologies for detection of .
