Case Study On Tacit Knowledge Management Systems Within X Company

1y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
532.89 KB
9 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aarya Seiber
Transcription

Technology and Investment, 2013, 4, 92-100http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ti.2013.42011 Published Online May 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ti)Case Study on Tacit Knowledge Management Systemswithin X Company*Jiangping Wan1,2, Ming Zeng1, Yahui Zhu11School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, ChinaInstitute of Emerging Industrialization Development, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, ChinaEmail: scutjsp@126.com, zm656690@qq.com, zhuyahui0819@qq.com2Received February 12, 2013; revised March 29, 2013; accepted April 6, 2013Copyright 2013 Jiangping Wan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.ABSTRACTCase study on tacit knowledge management system within X company includes the design of tacit knowledge management system (the recognition and acquisition of tacit knowledge), mechanisms (the factor analysis for the transition andsharing of tacit knowledge) and implementation (the sharing enterprise culture build, the effective incentive mechanismconstruct and the organization structure design). The evaluation system is established based on critical success factors(the recognition capability, the sharing standard, the sharing mechanism of tacit knowledge). The purpose of study is toimprove tacit knowledge management system within enterprise.Keywords: Explicit Knowledge; Tacit Knowledge; Knowledge Conversion; Tacit Knowledge Management Systems;Case Study1. IntroductionMichael Polanyi divided knowledge into tacit knowledgeand explicit knowledge [1]. Tacit knowledge exists inhuman brains, which is the knowledge that people don’tknow, in other words people don’t know what they know.Verna Allee thought that tacit knowledge which exists inindividuals is private and has its own special background,and it also depends on experience, intuition and discernment [2]. Nonaka figured that organizations create andmake use of knowledge via the interaction of tacitknowledge and explicit knowledge, which is calledknowledge conversion process [3].X company is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, with approximately 259,000 people serving clients in more than120 countries. X company, which owns unparalleled experience, comprehensive capabilities across all industriesand business functions, and extensive research on theworld’s most successful companies, collaborates withclients to help them become high performance businessesand governments.X company has conducted business more than twentyyears in the greater China region, which locates in Bei*This research was supported by Key Project of Guangdong ProvinceEducation Office (06JDXM63002), NSF of China (70471091), andQualiPSo (IST-FP6-IP-034763).Copyright 2013 SciRes.jing, Shanghai, Dalian, Chengdu, Guangzhou, HongKong and Taipei. X company, an expert for performanceimprovement, helps customers determine strategy, optimize the process, integrate system, import innovation,enhance the overall competitive advantage, thus achievesgreat excellent performance. Its senior managers alsocarry out successful knowledge management practicewithin its interior, sharing knowledge has become thelong-standing culture while X company helps customersmanage knowledge effectively. The success for X company largely benefits from its strong knowledge management system.This paper is organized in the following: Section 2 is aliterature review, including Nonaka’s framework of knowledge creation mechanisms, the concept of knowledgeconversion, and knowledge management in softwareprocess improvement (SPI). Section 3 is tacit knowledge management systems (TKMS) design. Section 4 isTKMS mechanisms. Section 5 is TKMS implementation.Section 6 is TKMS evaluation. Section 7 is conclusion.2. Literature ReviewLanguage is an excellent example of tacit knowledge:native speakers of a language are often unable to articulate the grammatical and syntactic rules governing it.Tacit knowledge contributes to the “stickiness” of inforTI

J. P. WAN ET AL.mation required for problem-solving, making it difficultfor others to gather, transfer, and utilize. The difficult tocodify nature of tacit knowledge contributes to difficultto imitate capabilities that may provide competitive advantage to the organization. Success of process improvement projects depends on the capture of both explicit and tacit types of knowledge [4].The concept of “tacit knowledge” is a cornerstone inorganizational knowledge creation theory and coversknowledge that is unarticulated and tied to the senses,movement skills, physical experiences, intuition, or implicit rules of thumb. Knowledge of wine tasting, craftinga violin, or interpreting a complex seismic printout of anoil reservoir is well-known examples of tacit knowledge.Tacit knowledge differs from “explicit knowledge” thatis uttered and captured in drawings and writing. For example, knowledge of a solution to a differential equationis explicit knowledge. The concept of “knowledge conversion” explains how tacit and explicit knowledge interact along a continuum [4].Nonaka’s framework [3] provides a rationale for theuse of knowledge-creation practices to generate groupknowledge by engaging individual team members inprocess improvement projects. The framework depictsthe process of knowledge creation as cycles of conversions between two types of knowledge—explicit, andtacit (Figure 1). It is worthwhile to note that this classification of knowledge as either explicit or tacit is one oftwo prominent classifications in the knowledge management literature (Table 1 provides a brief overview ofdifferent classifications of knowledge creation efforts[5]). Explicit knowledge is codified and documented, andits transfer can take place in impersonal ways—for instance, through written instructions and diagrams. Tacitknowledge is knowledge that is difficult to articulate,especially in terms of cause-effect relationships.Knowledge transfer model of software process improvement (SPI) and the conceptual framework of influencing factors are established in [6]. The model includesfive elements which are knowledge of transfer, sourcesof knowledge, recipients of knowledge, relationship oftransfer parties, and the environment of transfer.The conceptual framework includes ten key factorswhich are ambiguity, institutionalization, transfer willingness, capacity of impartation, capacity of absorption,incentive mechanism, culture, technical support, trust andknowledge distance. The knowledge creation effectivefactors were found in both necessary elements for stimulus of knowledge creation and the key influencing factorsof software project success [7]. The knowledge creationeffective factors in requirement development project areclarified through deeply interviewing the software enterprises in Guangdong province as well as other corporateCopyright 2013 SciRes.93Figure 1. Nonaka’s framework of knowledge-creation mechanisms.Table 1. Selected classifications of knowledge creation mechanisms.Author(s)YearKnowledge creation mechanismsArgyris1977Single & double loop learningNonaka1991Combination, internalization,socialization & externalizationKogut andZander1992Operational & conceptualSpender1996Capturing individual andorganizational knowledgeNahapiet andGhoshal1998Acquiring intellectual & social capitalinformation departments. Knowledge creation theory ofNonaka is appropriate for analyzing knowledge creatingof software requirement development (SRD). The issueof this research is exported: how to improve SRD withknowledge creation theory? And it includes three subissues: 1) What factors are impacting SRD in the view ofknowledge creation theory? 2) What do enable knowledge flow during SRD? 3) How can we guide SRD byusing knowledge creation theory? Case study findingsinclude [8]: 1) It can facilitate the implementation of theproject to have the necessary diversity of the project team;2) The introduction of experts on requirement canachieve the transformation of knowledge effectively, thushelping to carry out the project; 3) Methodology and related technologies are important. A knowledge model forSPI project based on knowledge creation theory and itstwenty-four measurement items are developed in [9], andtwo hypothesizes about the interaction of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge in SPI are proposed. Elevenfactors are extracted through statistical analysis. Threeknowledge creation practices for capturing tacit knowledge contribute greatly to SPI, which are communicationamong members, crossover collaboration in practicalwork and pair programming. Two knowledge creationpractices for capturing explicit knowledge have significant positive impact on SPI, which are integrating projectdocument and on the job training.TI

J. P. WAN ET AL.943. Tacit Knowledge Management SystemsDesignX company strengthens enterprise tacit knowledge management to convert the enterprise knowledge assets intotangible assets for sustainable competitive advantage. Itis necessary to manage the tacit knowledge that we musthave a explicit understanding on both the purpose andfunction of tacit knowledge management for recognitionand acquirement tacit knowledge.3.1. The Purpose, Function of Tacit KnowledgeManagementTacit knowledge management can achieve the followingpurpose and function within an enterprise: 1) Enhancethe enterprise’s strain and innovation capacity. Tacitknowledge management improves enterprise organization’s strain and innovation capacity with the knowledgesharing and collective wisdom; 2) Prevent the loss ofenterprise’s core knowledge. Tacit knowledge management can prevent a heavy loss that enterprise’s knowledge staff or technician leaving office; 3) Improve theorganization efficiency. With obtaining and sharing thebest experience, enterprise can shorten the operation timeand minimize the repeated work, so as to improve theorganization efficiency.3.2. The Recognition of Tacit KnowledgeIt is necessary to recognize knowledge for managing tacitknowledge in X company. It should be to make internaltacit knowledge transparent, find out the knowledgewhich can create the most value, where and who needsthese knowledge, who controls these knowledge, thendescribe the relationship between the personnel, workand tacit knowledge, it is necessary for achieving thecommunication and sharing of tacit knowledge.3.2.1. The Classification of Tacit KnowledgeX company classifies the tacit knowledge as follow: 1) Itcan be divided into practice, impart and innovative according to the different approach which the knowledgestaff obtains tacit knowledge; 2) It can be divided intoencoding, not easy coding and can’t coding according tothe degree of coding; 3) It can be divided into individual,team and enterprise according to the different degree thatgroup locates in; 4) It can be divided into apparent, transitional, matured according to the cognition degree oftacit knowledge owner to tacit knowledge and the innovated degree of tacit knowledge.3.2.2. Enterprise Knowledge Structure Chart BuildKnowledge structure chart refers to a chart in a methodrefine knowledge based from big to small, from thick tothin, from general to professional, in the form of treehierarchical structure, decomposed the organize knowledge of layers. The method of building enterpriseknowledge structure chart is: first of all, enterprise managers should determine enterprise’s overall strategicgoals according to inner and outer environment. Then,the enterprise’s overall goal is deeply analysed, the overall goal into different points target is decomposed, andthe corresponding business process is recognized. Next,all knowledge are recognized which needed during realizing each business process, classify the knowledge according to attributes levels. Last, it is to excavate theidentified knowledge with directional mining method onthe basis of classification (Figure 2).Figure 2. X company knowledge structure chart.Copyright 2013 SciRes.TI

J. P. WAN ET AL.3.2.3. Expert Knowledge Map BuildThe building process of expert knowledge map for Xcompany is: The recognition of enterprise knowledgeexperts; the selection of experts; the classification andrecognition of knowledge experts; establish a search engine of knowledge experts; expand expert knowledgemap’s content, improve in the repeated evaluation; precipitate experts’ tacit knowledge (Figure 3).95ideas of the simulation system with low cost; we canobtain by on-the-scene observation, experience, mentoring with statistics for the transient state of tacit knowledge.4. Tacit Knowledge Management SystemsMechanism3.3. Tacit Knowledge Obtain4.1. The Factor Analysis of Affecting TacitKnowledge Transition and SharingX company acquires apparent tacit knowledge throughon-the-scene observation, experience, imitation andcrowd test; acquires the matured tacit knowledge throughthe man-machine auxiliary experiment to speed up thetacit knowledge refinement, finds problems and tacitknowledge kernel with the help of computer through the4.1.1. Analysis in the Perspective of Human NatureTacit knowledge owners usually have forestall and monopoly psychology, leading tacit knowledge difficult toautomatic communicate and transform, plus the unfairphenomenon of domestic enterprises “knowledge transaction” widespread, it accelerates staff and organizationFigure 3. X company expert knowledge map.Copyright 2013 SciRes.TI

96J. P. WAN ET AL.owned tacit knowledge to protect their own intellectualproperty rights and also further intensifies this kind ofpsychology. Knowledge receiver have conflicted psychology. The reasons are primary in the following: thecompetitive concept is not clear, the “hide privacy” psychology, “knowledge island” phenomenon.4.1.2. Analysis from Perspective of Enterprise CultureAt present there is a common misunderstanding withinthe organization, such as the solutions provided by seniormembers are better than the ones provided by primarymembers. The organization should avoid measuring thequality of knowledge by position, it should be judgedwith the knowledge of the contribution and fitness.Moreover, the team members lack direct dialogue space,many organizations only pay more attention to the infrastructure construction, but ignore to create a good dialogue environment for team members, thus appear thesituation that the members of the organization have thedesire of communication but without communicationplace. Moreover, team members lack necessary trust between each other. The basis of knowledge transition iscredit. Credit refers to “believe” or “trust” according tothe view of Davenport. Because different people havedifferent evaluation about the significance, value, meanness of knowledge, the conclusion may be different, sothe team members have different sense of approval forthe same view between each other, inevitably lack oftrust. Finally, team members lack common language.Communication between both have a big difference withthe knowledge basis and communication barriers, it isalso difficult to promote tacit knowledge transform andthe realization of enterprise knowledge sharing.4.1.3. Analysis from the Perspective of Characteristicsof the Knowledge ItselfFirst of all, knowledge itself has unique scarcity. Secondly, tacit knowledge has media nonverbal characteristics. One of the characteristics for tacit knowledge is existing in the form of the language, secondly, the neededtime of study also becomes a factor interfered with thepropagation of tacit knowledge, the distance also produces influence and difficulty for the propagation of tacitknowledge. Thirdly, tacit knowledge has unconsciouscharacteristics, first of all, it often makes people ignorethe existence of tacit knowledge, secondly, from the perspective of personal use, we usually don’t need to makeit clarify and consume a large time for only using thetacit knowledge; many expression form of tacit knowledge are thought no value. Some individuals who ownthe tacit knowledge of unique value usually don’t want totransfer and share. Finally, tacit knowledge as a kind ofcapability can bring value to a person.Copyright 2013 SciRes.4.1.4. Analysis from the Perspective of ManagementInstitutionFirst of all, enterprise tacit knowledge flow does notadapt to enterprise organization structure. The traditionalorganization structure uses the pyramid hierarchical organization structure, although this kind of organizationstructure improves the labor productivity to some extent,it will appear the following disadvantages with the development of society: it is difficult for knowledge andinformation communication, it is difficult staff creativity,it is difficult to adapt the changeable environmentquickly. Moreover, without organization incentive system, it is difficult to measure knowledge sharing performance effectively. People are competitive inherently,they also show self-satisfaction for owing the knowledgeothers lacked, and even keep a secret, make themselvesbecome the owner of the scarce resources and have thesuperiority. It is difficult for X company let employeesshare their knowledge. The traditional organization performance appraisal system doesn’t put the employee’sknowledge contribution in an important position whichshould be. There are incentive systemic problems, theadaptability of the incentive problem, the effectiveness ofthe incentive problem, incentive innovation question andother kinds of problems incentive system in fact withinenterprise.4.2. Sharing Tacit Knowledge4.2.1. Ways for Sharing Tacit KnowledgeX company realizes the sharing of tacit knowledge asfollow: 1) Establish community practice. When peoplehave a reason to work together, they will share storiesand lessons they learned, they impart their practicalknowledge each other; 2) Master trains an apprentice.“Master trains an apprentice” activities make the staffhave the opportunity to absorb and digest experience andbroad their views from industry experts; 3) Personnelrotation. According to the generally determined deadlineof enterprise planned, let staffs rotate as different working practice; 4) Strong connected cross-functional team.Knowledge workers from different functional departments work in the same team work, it makes them sharetheir tacit knowledge, and when the team complete thetask and dismiss, different functional departments’ employees can also bring the complementary tacit knowledge back to their departments, further promoting andapplying; 5) Construct case library. The constructionprocess of the case library includes four phases for describing, storage, sharing and innovation. In the describing phase, experts can describe the safety knowledgeclearly through many kinds of form either elaborating thespecific process or describing and demonstrating bysome tools at the same time. In the storage phase, orTI

J. P. WAN ET AL.ganization should gather, select, classify, sort and storageto the organizational case library with the numerous secure knowledge, so the past work experiences of organization and decision-making cases can become repeatedusing resources. In the sharing phase, the organizationprovide case sharing platform in the internal organization,so that employees can extract the ways of solving relatedproblems quickly through the case study, not all startfrom all over again, and avoid the waste of resources. Inthe innovation phase, employees blend tacit knowledgeacquired from case in its own knowledge system throughintegration and internality, and apply knowledge in theactual work practice, arouse a new valuable tacit knowledge; 6) Establish experts group. Organization shouldstrengthen the effective supervision and support duringassembling experts group to make sure that questions canget a satisfactory answer asked by employees; 7) Keepexperience communication conferences. In the experience communication conferences, the content of the employees expressed bases on their own knowledge background, every employee submit their knowledge in theprocess, understand and learn other people’s knowledge,so as to realize the knowledge sharing; 8) Establish interest groups. Group determines the project based on theanalysis of enterprise internal question; 9) Establish electronic network. It is an important channel which makingthe knowledge sharing both sides get rid of space, timelimit and ignoring the organization internal hierarchyrelationship to realize the knowledge sharing to a certainextent.4.2.2. Technology Platform of Sharing TacitKnowledgeIt should solve two basic questions for realizing knowledge sharing. First, construct the enterprise informationnetwork which covers all business activities of the enterprise and guarantee that the enterprise has a smoothphysical channel in each information release point andinformation collection point in the complex survival environment; Second, the application software systemsshould be developed to meet the needs of enterprise(Figure 4).4.2.3. Institution of Sharing Tacit KnowledgeThe institution of sharing tacit knowledge in X companyincludes the following aspects: the institution of knowledge classification and standardization, the institution ofknowledge document accumulation and update, the institution of the internalization of external knowledge, theinstitution of intellectual property rights protection.The institution of knowledge classification and standardization refers to that the classification of enterpriseknowledge can not only be in a accordance with post andprofessional classification, but also can be in accordanceCopyright 2013 SciRes.97Figure 4. Technical platform of sharing tacit knowledgewithin X company.with the local knowledge and global knowledge, routineknowledge and exception knowledge in order to makethe knowledge enterprises’ tacit knowledge share andapply better. Local knowledge refers to the knowledgesharing in a team, a department of enterprise, and globalknowledge refers to knowledge sharing in all the departments of enterprise. Routine knowledge refers toknowledge that can numerable, standardized process andhave matured through the test of practice. Exceptionknowledge refers to a kind of personal technical skill,experience knowledge which has not rules or is difficultto encode only happening in emergencies.The institution of knowledge document accumulationand update refers to enterprise's professional knowledgemanagers organize technical skill, best practice and sorting into writing material, organize the enterprise strategyand good marketing methods and technology into become materials, then classify and keep in the archives, itcan be shared for enterprise employees. The institution ofupdating knowledge document refers that the knowledgemanager reviews the archived files in regulated time tosee whether the contents are outdated, invalid, multipleand conflict.The institution of the internalization of externalknowledge refers to transform the knowledge of externalexperts and scholars into the enterprise’s internal knowledge.The institution of intellectual property rights protection refers to protect the knowledge staff's tacit knowledge property rights, establishing a series of protectedmeasures including knowledge signature, intellectualachievements declaration, knowledge performance rewardsand punishments etc. The intellectual property protectionsystem can eliminate the knowledge staff’s scary mindfor losing some advantage status because of sharing tacitknowledge, coordinate tacit knowledge communicationand the conflict of interest between owners and usersduring the sharing process, and change the monopolytacit knowledge status into sharing with each others.TI

98J. P. WAN ET AL.5. Tacit Knowledge Management SystemsImplementationX company achieves the tacit knowledge managementthrough building the sharing enterprise culture, constructing the effective incentive mechanism of the tacitknowledge sharing, optimizing and designing organization structure.5.1. Building Sharing Enterprise CultureCultivates sharing type enterprise culture within X company mainly has the following steps: 1) Enterprise seniorleaders’ attention and participation. Enterprise seniorleaders’ attention can build a good atmosphere, that senior leaders participate and take the leading support andpromote the sharing type culture construction can haveexample effectiveness; 2) Cultivate employees sharingvalues and team spirit. Team spirit emphasize the important position the team in the enterprise, it makes the employees to share experience and knowledge. The mutualcooperation among the members of the group can promote the transition of tacit knowledge; 3) Create a kindorganization environment of sharing and innovatingknowledge can be respected. Pay much attention andencouragement to the employee’s knowledge sharingbehavior, let employees contribute positive their knowledge in strong sharing type culture atmosphere for theorganization; 4) Establish the corresponding knowledgeincentive mechanism. Establish explicit knowledge system, make explicit the employee’s knowledge achievement; establish a knowledge performance mechanism,the objective evaluation standards and knowledge rewardmechanism, reward contributed employees; 5) Buildlearning organization. Train the knowledge staff continuing learning spirit.5.2. Construct Effective Incentive MechanismX company establishes the effective incentive mechanism mainly in the following: 1) Build an incentive mechanism with the center of the knowledge staff's humancapital property rights. The incentive mechanism withthe center of the knowledge staff’s human capital is asfollow: a) incentive mechanism of tacit knowledge property rights; b) incentive mechanism of fully authorized; c)incentive mechanism of comprehensive salary. 2) Buildan incentive mechanism with the center of self development. It includes: a) pay attention to the knowledge staff’sindividual development; b) give challenging work; c)strengthen the education training. 3) Build an incentivemechanism with the center of psychological contract.The psychological contract can create a “hidden platform” for enterprise’s tacit knowledge transition andsharing.Copyright 2013 SciRes.5.3. Design Organization Structure5.3.1. Overlapping PrincipleThat conscious overlap enterprise information, businessactivities and management responsibilities in the processof organizational structure design seems to mean unnecessary waste, but overlapping design can stimulate frequent dialogue and communication between enterpriseemployees, it can help staff to form a “common cognitivebasis”, and also promote the individual tacit knowledgeinnovate into explicit knowledge.5.3.2. The Learning PrinciplesEnterprise organization structure should create a goodorganizational environment for the employees’ learn, andguide the staff systematic learn actively, so that employees can systematic study and think, and integrate thescattered knowledge resource dispersed in each staff'sbrain into a strong power. It can achieve a great purposewhich acquires knowledge and information from others.It is more important to activate employee’s knowledgeinnovative capability with learn.5.3.3. The Principles of Matching Power andKnowledge DistributionWhile running the knowledge management within enterprise, personal value and influence depends more on bothhow much the knowledge he owns and knowledge innovation capability, not the position, that is the principles ofmatching decision-making according with knowledge.The implementation of X company organization structure optimum design includes as follow: 1) Establish aknowledge-based cooperation team. 2) Establish ChiefKnowledge Officer. 3) Establish overlapping project develop teams.6. Tacit Knowledge Management SystemsEvaluationThere are nine questions in tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion (TKMS) [4]: 1) What is the status of“truth” in the definition of knowledge? 2) Do tacit andexplicit knowledge fall along a continuum? 3) Is thetacit/explicit knowledge distinction along the continuumvaluable for organization science? 4) What is the conceptual basis of knowledge conversion? 5) Given therelationship between tacit knowledge and social practices,how can the concept of knowledge conversion be upheld?6) What is the outcome of knowledge conversion? 7)What is the relationship between organizational knowledge creation and social practices in organizations? 8)When and why do social practices contribute to the conservation of existing tacit knowledge and existing routinerather than organizational knowledge creation and innovation? 9) How can leadership motivate and enable individuals to contribute to organizational knowledge creaTI

J. P. WAN ET AL.tion by transcending social practices?In our understanding, X company tacit knowledgemanagement system mainly involves recognition andacquirement of tacit knowledge, conversion, sharing and99implementation. It can take the three key indicators(critical success factors) for evaluation. The typical experts within X company give the evaluated score of everyproject according to the evaluation standard in Table 2.Table 2. The critical success factors of tacit knowledge management system.NumberIndexU11The classified degree of tacitknowledgeU12The perfect degree of the knowledgestructure chartU13The utilized efficiency of expertknowledge mapU14The acquisitive standard of tacitknowledgeU21The unblocked standard of the ways oftacit knowledge sharing channelsU22The perfect degree of the technologicalplatformU23The perfect standard of tacitknowledge sharing mechanismU31The building standard of sharingenterprise cultureU32The perfect degree of the effectiveincentive mechanism of knowledge staffU33The support strength of organizationalstructure designCopyright 2013 SciRes.Level (description)V1: Tacit knowledge hasn’t classi

oil reservoir is well-known examples of tacit knowledge. Tacit knowledge differs from "explicit knowledge" that is uttered and captured in drawings and writing. For ex-ample, knowledge of a solution to a differential equation . is explicit knowledge. The concept of "knowledge con-version" explains how tacit and explicit knowledge in-

Related Documents:

(explicit to tacit). As tacit knowledge is internal, and embedded in people, human interactions are essential for its transfer. So in the socialization process tacit knowledge in the form of experience or skills can be transferred between individuals. Externalization, on the other hand is a process of making tacit knowledge explicit. For example,

understand the importance of tacit knowledge sharing during ERP implementation. The sharing of tacit knowledge is a key problem in any ERP system implementation because tacit knowledge is embedded in complex organizational processes, in legacy systems, in externally based processes. This study presents findings about facilitators of tacit

methodology for tacit knowledge sharing. Tacit knowledge is that knowledge related to skills, know-how, know why, and high level of expertise [27, 28]. Several researchers talk about tacit knowledge and say that whether tacit knowledge is an individual issue or something which can be shared by individuals and groups. [29 ,30]. 3.

knowledge (p. 1014). Bordum views the move to capture tacit knowledge in knowledge management systems as an exercise of power by managers over workers. Hager and Farrell suggest that tacit knowledge is an ambiguous concept, and in many cases labeling something as being tacit knowledge only renames a problem and therefore closes off further inquiry.

for tacit knowledge. The value of harvesting the tacit knowledge held by the traditional doctors is vast and presents new frontiers in the field of knowledge management. However, there is not much work conducted in harvesting of tacit knowledge from traditional doctors (Gibert-Tisseuil 1997).

a conducive environment for tacit knowledge; identify the challenges experienced in the management of tacit knowledge; give recommendations and propose a model/framework for tacit knowledge management at KIPPRA. The study adopted a qualitative research method. Interviews and observation were used as primary data collection methods.

XML and EDI were discussed in his paper, however, tacit knowledge was not supported by the system. To support both explicit and tacit knowledge, a knowledge management system needs to be built with content and collaboration technologies. As Duffy (2001) pointed out, technologies to support tacit knowledge are more likely to need human .

Part 2, Design – High Strength Steels was combined with Part 1, Design in 1993. Part 5, Special Types of Construction was combined with Part 1, Design in 2008. Part 10, Bearing Design, and Part 11, Bearing Construction, were combined into a new Part 5, Bearing Design and Construction in 2013.