Quality Council For General And Further Education And Training

1y ago
2 Views
1 Downloads
1.26 MB
85 Pages
Last View : 23d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Mya Leung
Transcription

Quality Council for General and FurtherEducation and TrainingReport on the Quality Assurance ofthe April 2021 NATED Report190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3Examinations Administered by theDepartment of Higher Educationand Training (DHET)

REPORT ON THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF THEAPRIL 2021 NATED REPORT 190/191: ENGINEERINGSTUDIES N2–N3 EXAMINATIONS ADMINISTERED BYTHE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION ANDTRAINING (DHET)PUBLISHED BY:Quality Council for General and FurtherEducation and Trainingi

COPYRIGHT 2021UMALUSI COUNCIL FOR QUALITY ASSURANCEIN GENERAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.While all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the informationcontained herein, Umalusi accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever if the information is, forwhatsoever reason, incorrect, and Umalusi reserves its right to amend any incorrect information.ii

CONTENTSINTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDvABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSviiLIST OF TABLES AND FIGURESviiiCHAPTER 11MODERATION OF QUESTION PAPERS1.1 Introduction11.2 Scope and Approach11.3 Summary of Findings31.4 Areas of Improvement121.5 Areas of Non-compliance121.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement131.7 Conclusion14CHAPTER 2 MODERATION OF CONDUCT OF INTERNAL CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT152.1 Introduction152.2 Scope and Approach152.3 Summary of Findings162.4 Areas of Improvement342.5 Areas of Non-compliance342.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement352.7 Conclusion35CHAPTER 3 MONITORING OF WRITING363.1 Introduction363.2 Scope and Approach363.3 Summary of Findings383.4 Areas of Improvement493.5 Areas of Non-compliance493.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement503.7 Conclusion50CHAPTER 4 STANDARDISATION OF MARKING GUIDELINES514.1 Introduction514.2 Scope and Approach514.3 Summary of Findings524.4 Areas Good Practice544.5 Areas of Non-compliance544.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement544.7 Conclusion54iii

CHAPTER 5 MONITORING OF THE MARKING CENTRES555.1 Introduction555.2 Scope and Approach555.3 Summary of Findings555.4 Areas of Improvement585.5 Areas of Non-Compliance585.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement595.7 Conclusion59CHAPTER 6 VERIFICATION OF THE MARKING606.1 Introduction606.2 Scope and Approach606.3 Summary of Findings626.4 Areas of Improvement706.5 Areas of Non-compliance706.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement706.7 Conclusion71CHAPTER 7 STANDARDISATION AND RESULTING727.1 Introduction727.2 Scope and Approach727.3 Findings and Decisions737.4 Areas of Improvement747.5 Areas of Non-compliance747.6 Directives for compliance and Improvement757.7 Conclusion75iv

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDThe NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examinations are administered and managedby the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) on a trimester basis in April, August andNovember of each year. Programmes for these examinations are offered by public Technical andVocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges, private Further Education and Training (FET) colleges,some correctional services centres and a few centres outside the borders of South Africa.As a Quality Council, Umalusi, is mandated by the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) and Generaland Further Education and Training Quality Assurance (GENFETQA) Acts to develop and implementpolicy and criteria for assessment of the qualifications on its sub-framework. The NATED Report 190/191:Engineering Studies N1–N3 is registered by SAQA as a programme on the Umalusi sub-framework.As the Quality Council for General and Further Education and Training, Umalusi:a. Must perform the external moderation of assessment of the various assessment bodies andeducation institutions;b. May adjust raw marks during the standardisation process; andc. Must, with the consensus of the Director-General and after consultation with the relevantassessment body or education institution, approve the publication of the results of learners if theCouncil is satisfied that the assessment body or education institution has:i. Conducted the assessment free from any irregularity that might jeopardise the integrity ofthe assessment or its outcomes;ii. Complied with the requirements prescribed by the Council for conducting assessments;iii. Applied the standards prescribed by the Council with which a learner is required to complyto obtain a certificate; andiv. Complied with every other condition determined by the Council.Umalusi therefore has a mandate to ensure that the NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3examinations conducted each trimester are fair, valid and reliable. To perform this function, Umalusi isrequired to ensure that the quality and standard of all the assessment practices associated with theNATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examinations are set and maintained.All the question papers for the April 2021 examinations were set nationally by the DHET and moderatedexternally by Umalusi. The DHET distributed question papers via courier to nodal points for collection byexamination centres. Once the examinations had been written, answer scripts had to be returned to thenodal points within 60 minutes, of the stipulated end time of examinations, as per regulations. Drawingsubjects were written during the first week of the examination session. All the April 2021 examinationswere written during morning sessions, starting at 09:00.The DHET mandated the marking centre management staff of the national and provincial markingcentres to make use of the marking personnel who had been appointed for the November 2020 NATEDReport 190/191 examinations.The DHET followed a decentralised (provincial) marking model for most N2 instructional offerings anda centralised (national) model for most N3 instructional offerings. The N2 marking guidelines werestandardised on-line, after which they were distributed electronically to the marking centres.v

As in previous examinations, the April 2021 NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examinationswere conducted at some correctional services centres, private colleges, public colleges, and a fewcentres outside the borders of South Africa.As repeatedly reported in the past, the execution of the NATED Report 190/191: Engineering StudiesN2–N3 programmes and examinations present several challenges, the commonest of which include,but are not limited to:a. Outdated syllabi;b. No provision for exposure to practical components of development skills;c. Lack of lecturer capacity for effective tuition; andd. High numbers of candidates registering but failing to write the examinations.The purpose of this report is to provide feedback on the processes followed by Umalusi in the qualityassurance of the April 2021 NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examinations. The reportalso presents the findings, areas of compliance/improvement in the conduct, administration andmanagement of these examinations, and areas of non-compliance and directives for compliance. Thefindings are based on information derived from the Umalusi moderation, monitoring, verification andstandardisation processes, as well as from reports received from the DHET.This report covers the following quality assurance processes implemented by Umalusi:i. Moderation of question papers from a sample of N2 and N3 instructional offerings;ii. Monitoring/moderation of internal assessment;iii. Monitoring of the writing of examinations;iv. Monitoring of the marking of examinations;v. Standardisation of marking guidelines;vi. Verification of marking; andvii. Standardisation and resulting.vi

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSASCCD: sment Standards CommitteeChief Directorate: National Examinations and AssessmentChief Executive OfficerDepartment of Higher Education and TrainingDeputy Marking Centre Manager AcademicEastern CapeFurther Education and TrainingFree StateGautengGeneral and Further Education and Training Qualifications Sub-frameworkGeneral and Further Education and Training Quality AssuranceGovernment Printing WorksHead of DepartmentIdentity DocumentInternal Continuous AssessmentKwaZulu-NatalLimpopoMpumalangaNational Qualifications FrameworkNorth West ProvinceNorthern CapeOccupational Health and SafetyPersonnel Administrative MeasuresPortfolio of Assessment (lecturer portfolio)Portfolio of Evidence (learner portfolio)South AfricaSouth African Council for EducatorsShort Message ServiceState of ReadinessTechnical and Vocational Education and TrainingWestern Capevii

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURESTable 1A:Instructional offerings included in the moderated sample of question papersTable 1B:Approval status of question papers and marking guidelines after preliminarymoderationFigure 1A:Approval status of the NATED Report 190/191 Engineering Studies questionpapers after preliminary moderationFigure 1BApproval status of the NATED Report 190/191 Engineering Studies markingguidelines after preliminary moderationTable 1C:Summary of findings of the initial moderation of question papersTable 2A:Moderation of Report 190/191 internal continuous assessmentTable 2B:Findings on the moderation of August 2020 internal assessmentTable 3A:Examination centres monitored during the writing of examinationsTable 3B:Findings at sites monitoredTable 4A:N2 marking guideline discussions attended by external moderatorsTable 4B:N3 marking guideline discussions attended by external moderatorsTable 4C:Findings on the standardisation of marking guidelines of NATED N2 and N3instructional offeringsTable 5A:Marking centres monitored by Umalusi monitorsTable 5B:Marking centres monitored by Umalusi staff membersTable 6A:Distribution of instructional offerings across marking centresTable 6B:N2 sampling gridTable 6C:N3 sampling gridTable 6D:Verification of marking of N2 instructional offerings, number of provinces andexamination centres per provinceTable 6E:Verification of marking N3 instructional offerings, number of provinces andexamination centres per provinceTable 6F:Findings of the verification of marking of N2 instructional offeringsTable 6G:Findings of the verification of marking of N3 instructional offeringsTable 7A:Instructional offerings with outliersTable 7B:Standardisation decisionsviii

CHAPTER 1 MODERATION OF QUESTION PAPERS1.1IntroductionUmalusi conducts external moderation of question papers that are set nationally by the Departmentof Higher Education and Training (DHET). The purpose of external moderation of examination questionpapers and marking guidelines is to ensure that quality and standards are maintained in all the NATEDReport 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examination cycles.The moderation of question papers is a critical element of the quality assurance of the assessmentprocess. The external moderation process confirms that the question papers have been developedwith rigour and that they comply with Umalusi’s criteria and the curriculum and assessment policydocuments of the assessment body.The DHET is expected to appoint examiners and internal moderators with the requisite contentknowledge in the instructional offerings to set and internally moderate the question papers before theyare presented to Umalusi for external moderation. The question papers and marking guidelines areexpected to be print-ready when submitted to Umalusi for external moderation. It therefore remainsthe specific responsibility of the internal moderators to ensure that the question papers and markingguidelines are of an acceptable standard.To maintain public confidence in the national examination system, the question papers mustfurthermore be seen to be:a. Fair;b. Reliable;c. Within the scope of the national curriculum and assessment guideline;d. Representative of relevant conceptual domains; ande. Representative of relevant levels of cognitive demand.1.2Scope and ApproachUmalusi moderated and approved a total of 44 question papers and marking guidelines for the April2021 NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies N2–N3 examinations.The instructional offerings were moderated off-site; question papers, marking guidelines, assessmentframeworks and internal moderators’ reports were forwarded electronically to external moderators.1

Table 1A indicates the selected instructional offerings moderated per level:Table 1A: Instructional offerings included in the moderated sample of question papersInstructional OfferingsLevelAircraft Maintenance TheoryN3Building and Civil TechnologyN3Building DrawingN2 and N3Bricklaying and Plastering TheoryN2Building ScienceN2 and N3Carpentry and Roofing TheoryN2Diesel Trade TheoryN2 and N3Electrical Trade TheoryN2 and N3ElectrotechnologyN3Engineering DrawingN2 and N3Engineering ScienceN2 and N3Fitting and Machining TheoryN2Industrial ElectronicsN2 and N3Industrial Organisation and PlanningN3Industrial OrientationN3Instrument Trade TheoryN2 and N3Logic SystemsN2 and N3MathematicsN2 and N3MechanotechnologyN3Motor Trade TheoryN2 and N3Plant Operation TheoryN2 and N3Platers’ TheoryN2Plating and Structural Steel DrawingN2 and N3Plumbing TheoryN2Radio and Television TheoryN3Refrigeration Trade TheoryN3Supervision in IndustryN3Waste-water Treatment PracticeN3Water and Waste-water Treatment PracticeN2Water Treatment PracticeN3Welders’ TheoryN2The criteria according to which the question papers were moderated included the following aspects:a. Technical aspects related to the presentation of the question papers and marking guidelines;b. Effectiveness of internal moderation in improving the quality of question papers;c. Adherence to the syllabus with respect to content coverage;d. Types of questions, formulation and clarity of questions;e. Distribution of marks across cognitive levels;f. Consistency and appropriateness of mark allocation;g. Relevance and correctness of the marking guidelines;h. Appropriateness of language register, correct use of grammar in question papers and markingguidelines and content that is free from bias;i. Degree of predictability of questions and innovation in question papers; and2

j.1.3An overall evaluation of the question papers in terms of their suitability for the level assessed.Summary of FindingsThe preliminary moderation process of the 44 sampled question papers resulted in the followingfindings:a. Six question papers and four marking guidelines were approved and print-ready;b. Fifteen question papers and 18 marking guidelines were approved but required minortechnical changes;c. Twenty question papers and 19 marking guidelines were conditionally approved; theserequired amendments such as rephrasing or replacement of questions; andd. Three question papers together with their marking guidelines were rejected and requiredresetting and resubmission for external moderation.Table 1B: Approval status of question papers and marking guidelines after preliminarymoderationStatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedApproved:Bricklaying and Plastering Theory N2Diesel Trade Theory N2Print readyBuilding and Civil Technology N3Engineering Science N2Diesel Trade Theory N2Instrument Trade Theory N3Instrument Trade Theory N3Motor Trade Theory N2Waste-water Treatment Practice N3Water and Waste-water TreatmentPractice N2Approved:Aircraft Maintenance Theory N3Aircraft Maintenance Theory N3Minor technical changesBuilding Drawing N2Bricklaying and Plastering Theory N2Building Science N2 and N3Building and Civil Technology N3Engineering Science N3Building Drawing N2Industrial Electronics N2 and N3Building Science N2 and N3Industrial Orientation N3Electrotechnology N3Instrument Trade Theory N2Engineering Drawing N3Motor Trade Theory N2 and N3Engineering Science N3Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N2Industrial Electronics N2 and N3and N3Industrial Orientation N3Plumbing Theory N2Instrument Trade Theory N2Supervision in Industry N3Motor Trade Theory N3Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N2and N3Plumbing Theory N2Waste-water Treatment Practice N3Conditionally approved:Electrical Trade Theory N3Carpentry and Roof Work N2Questions/answersEngineering Drawing N3Electrical Trade Theory N2 and N3require restructuring/Engineering Science N2Industrial Organisation and Planning N3rephrasingPlaters’ Theory N2Mathematics N3Welders’ Theory N23

StatusConditionally approved:Question papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedLogic Systems N2Fitting and Machining Theory N2Questions/answersLogic Systems N2 and N3require replacementMathematics N2Mechanotechnology N3Plant Operation Theory N2Plant Operation Theory N3Platers’ Theory N2Practice N2Radio and Television Theory N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Supervision in Industry N3Water and Waste-water TreatmentWater Treatment Practice N3Welders’ Theory N2Conditionally approved:Carpentry and Roof Work N2Questions requireElectrical Trade Theory N2restructuring/Electro-technology N3rephrasing/Fitting and Machining Theory N2replacementIndustrial Organisation and Planning N3Logic Systems N3Mathematics N2 and N3Mechanotechnology N3Plant Operation Theory N2 and N3Radio and Television Theory N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Water Treatment Practice N3Rejected:Building Drawing N3Building Drawing N3Question paper to beDiesel Trade Theory N3Diesel Trade Theory N3reset and resubmittedEngineering Drawing N2Engineering Drawing N2Logic Systems N2Fitting and Machining Theory N2for internal and externalmoderationConditionally approved:Questions/answersLogic Systems N2 and N3require replacementMathematics N2Mechanotechnology N3Plant Operation Theory N2Plant Operation Theory N3Platers’ Theory N2Practice N2Radio and Television Theory N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Supervision in Industry N3Water and Waste-water TreatmentWater Treatment Practice N3Welders’ Theory N24

The graphs below (Figure 1A and 1B) provide a summary of the findings at first moderation of thequestion papers and the marking guidelines as captured from the external moderators’ reports.Question itionally approvedRejectedFigure 1A: Approval Status of the NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies question papersafter first moderationMarking Conditionally approvedRejectedFigure 1B: Approval Status of the NATED Report 190/191: Engineering Studies markingguidelines after first moderationTable 1C provides a summary of the most significant findings from the moderation of the April 2021examination question papers and marking guidelines. All findings are discussed in terms of the sampleof 44 instructional offerings moderated.Table 1C: Summary of findings of the initial moderation of question papersCriterionChallengesInstructional offering concernedTechnical criteriaSubmissionNeither the assessment grid nor internalBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2of supportingmoderation report were received for sixEngineering Drawing N2 and N3documentsquestion papers (14%), compared to 8%Mathematics N3during the August 2020 examinations.Plant Operation Theory N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N35

StatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedTechnical criteriaLayout of theThe cover page of four question papersCarpentry and Roof Work N2question paper(9%) did not contain all the necessaryEngineering Drawing N2 and N3details such as the logo, name ofPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N2instructional offering, time allocation,number of pages and additionalinformation; this can be compared to10% in the August 2020 examinations.Layout of theThe layout of two question papers (5%)Building Drawing N2question paperwas not reader-friendly, compared toMathematics N213% in the August 2020 examinations.Numbering of pagesNot all pages in two question papersEngineering Drawing N2(5%) were correctly numbered; thisSupervision in Industry N3proportion was the same as in theAugust 2020 examinations.Numbering of questionsSome questions in two question papersEngineering Drawing N3(5%) were not correctly numbered;Plant Operation Theory N3this was the same proportion (as in theAugust 2020 examinations).Headers and footersIn three question papers (7%), theFitting and Machining Theory N2headers and footers were notPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N2consistent and did not adhere to theSupervision in Industry N3required format, compared to 5% in theAugust 2020 examinations.Font type and sizeFonts were not used appropriatelyMathematics N2throughout one question paper (3%) (asin the August 2020 examinations).Mark and timeMark allocations in three questionAircraft Maintenance Theory N3allocationpapers (7%) were not clearly indicated,Carpentry and Roof Work N2as was the case in the AugustPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N2examinations.The mark allocation in six questionBuilding Drawing N2papers (14%) did not correspond toMathematics N2those in the marking guidelines; thisPlant Operation Theory N3can be compared to 13% in the AugustPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N2examinations.and N3Radio and Television Theory N3Quality of graphicsThe quality of illustrations, graphs andBuilding Drawing N2and illustrationstables was not appropriate, not clear,Carpentry and Roof Work N2contained errors or not print ready inEngineering Drawing N2 and N3eight question papers (19%), a declineEngineering Science N3compared to the 28% in the AugustMathematics N2 and N32020 examinations.Plant Operation Theory N3One question paper (6%) did notFitting and Machining Theory N2Format requirementsadhere to the format requirements ofthe syllabus.6

StatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedInternal moderationIncompleteThe moderator reports for 11 questionBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2moderator reportspapers (25%) were not complete, theBuilding Drawing N2 and N3same proportion as in the August 2020Building Science N2examinations.Engineering Drawing N2Fitting and Machining Theory N2Logic Systems N2 and N3Mathematics N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Water and Waste-water TreatmentPractice N2Quality andThe internal moderation reports forBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2standardnine question papers (25%) wereBuilding Drawing N3of internalunsatisfactory, compared to 18% in theCarpentry and Roof Work N2moderation reportAugust 2020 examinations.Electrical Trade Theory N2Engineering Drawing N2Fitting and Machining Theory N2Logic Systems N2Mathematics N2Radio and Television Theory N3The internal moderation reports forBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2six question papers (25%) were notBuilding Drawing N3of a satisfactory standard; the sameFitting and Machining Theory N2proportion as in the August 2020Industrial Electronics N2 and N3examinations.Mathematics N2RecommendationsThere was no evidence in nineBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2and implementation ofquestion papers (43%) that the internalBuilding Drawing N3recommendationsmoderator’s recommendations hadCarpentry and Roof Work N2been addressed or implemented,Fitting and Machining Theory N2compared to 18% in the August 2020Logic Systems N3examinations.Mathematics N2Motor Trade Theory N3Plant Operation Theory N2Radio and Television Theory N3Content coverageCoverage of theThe syllabus was not adequatelyDiesel Trade Theory N3syllabuscovered in four question papers (8%),Logic Systems N2 and N3the same proportion as in the AugustMathematics N22020 examinations.Several questions in four questionDiesel Trade Theory N3papers (9%) were beyond the scope ofFitting and Machining Theory N2the syllabus; this can be compared toLogic Systems N2 and N35% in the August 2020 examinations.7

StatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedInternal moderationIn two question papers (7%), topicsDiesel Trade Theory N3were not spread appropriately acrossMathematics N3the question paper; this can becompared to the 5% in the August 2020examinations.In three question papers (7%), topicsDiesel Trade Theory N3were not appropriately linked orMathematics N2 and N3integrated, as in the August 2020examinations.Four question papers (10%) did notBuilding Drawing N2reflect the latest developments in theMathematics N2 and N3teaching of the instructional offerings,Plant Operation Theory N2compared to 18% in the August 2020examinations.Types and quality of questionsTypes of questionsTwo question papers (5%) did not allowBuilding Science N3for creative responses from candidates,Engineering Science N3compared to 13% in the August 2020examinations.There was no correlation between markBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2allocation and level of difficulty or timeCarpentry and Roof Work N2allocation in questions in eight questionEngineering Drawing N2papers (18%), compared to 13% in theFitting and Machining Theory N2August 2020 examinations.Mathematics N3Plant Operation Theory N2 and N3Water Treatment Practice N3Quality ofQuestions in two question papers (5%)Fitting and Machining Theory N2questionsdid not relate to pertinent issues inIndustrial Organisation and Planning N3the instructional offerings; this was thesame proportion as in the August 2020examinations.Questions in eight question papersCarpentry and Roof Work N2(19%) contained vaguely definedElectrotechnology N3problems, ambiguous wording,Industrial Electronics N3extraneous or irrelevant information,Logic Systems N3trivia or unintentional clues to thePlant Operation Theory N2 and N3correct answers, compared to 18% inRefrigeration Trade Theory N3the August 2020 examinations.Water Treatment Practice N3Questions in five question papers (11%)Building Drawing N3did not provide clear instructional keyCarpentry and Roof Work N2words/verbs.Fitting and Machining Theory N2Industrial Electronics N3Plant Operation Theory N28

StatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedTypes and quality of questionsSome questions in 11 question papersBuilding Drawing N3(25%) did not contain sufficientCarpentry and Roof Work N2information to elicit appropriateEngineering Drawing N2responses, compared to 10% in theEngineering Science N2August 2020 examinations.Industrial Electronics N2 and N3Industrial Organisation and Planning N3Logic Systems N3Mathematics N2 and N3Plant Operation Theory N3Six question papers (14%) containedBuilding Drawing N3factual errors or misleading information,Building Science N2 and N3compared to 8% in the August 2020Engineering Science N2examinations.Mathematics N2Plant Operation Theory N3All references in questions to visuals,drawings, illustrations, examples, tables,graphs were relevant and correct in 36question papers (81%), compared to72% in the August 2020 examinations.Cognitive skillsAnalysis gridAnalysis grids in 14 question papersBricklaying and Plastering Theory N2(33%) did not indicate the cognitiveBuilding Science N2level of each question/sub-question,Electrical Trade Theory N2compared to 18% in the August 2020Engineering Drawing N2 and N3examinations.Fitting and Machining Theory N2Logic Systems N2 and N3Mathematics N2 and N3Mechanotechnology N3Plant Operation Theory N3Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N2Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Marks were inappropriately distributedEngineering Drawing N2across cognitive levels in sevenFitting and Machining Theory N2question papers (12%), compared toLogic Systems N2 and N320% in the August 2020 examinations.Mathematics N2 and N3Plant Operation Theory N3AssessmentFive question papers (15%) did notAircraft Maintenance Theory N3of latestreflect the latest developments in theBuilding Drawing N3developmentsknowledge field; this can be comparedIndustrial Organisation and Planning N3to 13% in the August 2020 examinations.Mathematics N3Motor Trade Theory N29

StatusQuestion papers of instructionalMarking guidelines of instructionalofferings concernedofferings concernedMarking guidelinesAccuracy ofSome answers in seven markingBuilding Drawing N2 and N3marking guidelinesguidelines (18%) did not correspondCarpentry and Roof Work N2to the questions in the question paper,Logic Systems N2an increase from 8% in the August 2020Mathematics N2examinations.Plant Operation Theory N3Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N3Seventeen marking guidelines (42%)Bricklaying and Plastering Theory N2contained answers that were notBuilding Drawing N3accurate, an increase compared toBuilding Science N2 and N325% in the August 2020 examinations.Carpentry and Roof Work N2Engineering Drawing N2 and N3Engineering Science N2Logic Systems N2 and N3Mechanotechnology N3Plant Operation Theory N2 and N3Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N2Radio and Television Theory N3Refrigeration Trade Theory N3Supervision in Industry N3Seven marking guidelines (27%) didAircraft Maintenance Theory N3not make provision for alternativeBuilding Drawing N2responses, where these were possible,Building Science N2compared to 13% in the August 2020Engineering Science N2examinations.Mathematics N3Plant Operation Theory N3Water and Waste-water TreatmentPractice N2Layout of markingThe marking guidelines for five questionEngineering Drawing N2 and N3guidelinespapers (9%) were not set out clearly, aMathematics N3decrease from 13% in the August 2020Plating and Structural Steel Drawing N2examinations.and N3The marking guideline for one questionPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N3paper (2%) was very poor; this can becompared to 5% in the August 2020examinations.Mark allocationThe allocation of marks in someBuilding Drawing N2questions were incomplete in sixLogic Systems N3marking guidelines (14%), compared toPlating and Structural Steel Drawing N225% in

examination centres. Once the examinations had been written, answer scripts had to be returned to the nodal points within 60 minutes, of the stipulated end time of examinations, as per regulations. Drawing subjects were written during the first week of the examination session. All the April 2021 examinations

Related Documents:

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan

service i Norge och Finland drivs inom ramen för ett enskilt företag (NRK. 1 och Yleisradio), fin ns det i Sverige tre: Ett för tv (Sveriges Television , SVT ), ett för radio (Sveriges Radio , SR ) och ett för utbildnings program (Sveriges Utbildningsradio, UR, vilket till följd av sin begränsade storlek inte återfinns bland de 25 största

Hotell För hotell anges de tre klasserna A/B, C och D. Det betyder att den "normala" standarden C är acceptabel men att motiven för en högre standard är starka. Ljudklass C motsvarar de tidigare normkraven för hotell, ljudklass A/B motsvarar kraven för moderna hotell med hög standard och ljudklass D kan användas vid

LÄS NOGGRANT FÖLJANDE VILLKOR FÖR APPLE DEVELOPER PROGRAM LICENCE . Apple Developer Program License Agreement Syfte Du vill använda Apple-mjukvara (enligt definitionen nedan) för att utveckla en eller flera Applikationer (enligt definitionen nedan) för Apple-märkta produkter. . Applikationer som utvecklas för iOS-produkter, Apple .

This presentation and SAP's strategy and possible future developments are subject to change and may be changed by SAP at any time for any reason without notice. This document is 7 provided without a warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a .

och krav. Maskinerna skriver ut upp till fyra tum breda etiketter med direkt termoteknik och termotransferteknik och är lämpliga för en lång rad användningsområden på vertikala marknader. TD-seriens professionella etikettskrivare för . skrivbordet. Brothers nya avancerade 4-tums etikettskrivare för skrivbordet är effektiva och enkla att

Den kanadensiska språkvetaren Jim Cummins har visat i sin forskning från år 1979 att det kan ta 1 till 3 år för att lära sig ett vardagsspråk och mellan 5 till 7 år för att behärska ett akademiskt språk.4 Han införde två begrepp för att beskriva elevernas språkliga kompetens: BI