Academic Libraries: 2010

1y ago
24 Views
2 Downloads
3.50 MB
59 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Konnor Frawley
Transcription

Academic Libraries: 2010First LookNCES 2012–365U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F E D U C AT I O N

Academic Libraries: 2010First LookDECEMBER 2011Tai PhanNational Center for Education StatisticsLaura HardestyJamie HugCindy SheckellsGovernments DivisionU.S. Census BureauNCES 2012-365U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

U.S. Department of EducationArne DuncanSecretaryInstitute of Education SciencesJohn Q. EastonDirectorNational Center for Education StatisticsJack BuckleyCommissionerElementary/Secondary & Libraries Studies DivisionJeffrey A. OwingsAssociate CommissionerThe National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting datarelated to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, andreport full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specializedanalyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statisticalsystems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries.NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurateindicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high quality data to the U.S. Department of Education,Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, allinformation contained herein is in the public domain.We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences. You, asour customer, are the best judge of our success in communicating information effectively. If you have any comments or suggestionsabout this or any other NCES product or report, we would like to hear from you. Please direct your comments to:NCES, IES, U.S. Department of Education1990 K Street NWWashington, DC 20016-5651December 2011The NCES Home Page address is http://nces.ed.gov.The NCES Publications and Products address is http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.This publication is only available online. To download, view, and print the report as a PDF file, go to the NCES Publicationsand Products address shown above.This report was prepared in part under Contract No. ED-IES-11-J-0003 with the U.S. Census Bureau. Mention of trade names,commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.Suggested CitationPhan, T., Hardesty, L., Hug, J., and Sheckells, C. (2011). Academic Libraries: 2010 (NCES 2012-365). U.S. Department ofEducation, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved [date] from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.Content ContactTai Phan(202) 502-7431tai.phan@ed.gov

AcknowledgmentsThis publication and the collection of academic library data have been a collaborative effort.First, we would like to thank the academic librarians who provided the information upon whichthe report is based and the library representatives from each state/jurisdiction who assisted in thisdata collection. The American Library Association (ALA) Office for Research and Statistics andthe Academic Libraries Survey Technical Working Group were instrumental in designing thesurvey. Members of the Academic Libraries Survey Technical Working Group during the time ofthe study were as follows: C. Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University Libraries; Terri Fishel,Macalester College Library; Kit Keller, ALA Consultant; Martha Kyrillidou, Association ofResearch Libraries; William Miller and Rita Pellen, Florida Atlantic University Libraries;Kenley Neufeld, Santa Barbara City College; Patricia Profeta, Indian River State CollegeLibrary; and Mary Jane Petrowski, ALA Association of College and Research Libraries.iii

ContentsPageAcknowledgments. iiiList of Tables .vIntroduction .1Selected Findings .2Tables .3References .17Appendix A: Technical Notes .19Appendix B: Glossary . 32Appendix C: Survey Questionnaire and Instructions.34iv

List of TablesTablePage1.Total circulation, interlibrary loan transactions, and documents received fromcommercial services at academic libraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegieclassification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .42.Number of academic libraries, by public service hours per typical week, control,level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fall 2010 .53.Gate count, and total information services to individuals and groups, by control, level,size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .64.Volumes held at end of fiscal year and number of academic libraries, by number ofbooks, serial backfiles and other paper materials including government documents,control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .75.Number of volumes, units, and subscriptions held at the end of the fiscal year atacademic libraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution:Fiscal year 2010 .86.Number of volumes, units, and subscriptions added during the fiscal year at academiclibraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution:Fiscal year 2010 .97.Number and percentage distribution of different types of full-time equivalent (FTE)staff at academic libraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification ofinstitution: Fall 2010 .108.Number of academic libraries and expenditures, by control, level, size, and Carnegieclassification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .119.Number of academic libraries and expenditures, by selected expenditure categories,control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .1210.Expenditures for different types of information resources at academic libraries, bycontrol, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010 .1311.Operating expenditures for equipment and other selected expenditures at academiclibraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution:Fiscal year 2010 .14v

TablePage12.Percentage of academic libraries with selected electronic services, by control, level,size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fall 2010 .1513.Percentage of academic libraries reporting virtual reference services, by type of virtualreference service reported, control, level, size, and Carnegie classificationof institution: Fiscal year 2010 .16A-1.Number and percentage of responding academic libraries, by level,control of institution, and item: 2010.24A-2.Number and percentage of nonresponding academic libraries, by level, control ofinstitution, and state/jurisdiction: 2010 .28A-3.Total number of academic libraries, by level, control of institution, andstate/jurisdiction: 2010 .30vi

IntroductionThis report presents tabulations for the 2010 Academic Libraries Survey (ALS) conducted by theU.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), within theInstitute of Education Sciences. The 2010 ALS population included postsecondary institutionswith all of the following: total library expenditures that exceed 10,000; an organized collectionof printed or other materials, or a combination thereof; a staff trained to provide and interpretsuch materials as required to meet the informational, cultural, recreational, or educational needsof the clientele; an established schedule in which services of the staff are available to theclientele; and the physical facilities necessary to support such a collection, staff, and schedule.This definition includes libraries that are part of learning resource centers. Branch andindependent libraries are defined as auxiliary library service outlets with quarters separate fromthe central library that houses the basic collection. The central library administers the branches.In ALS, libraries on branch campuses that have separate NCES identification numbers arereported as separate libraries.When academic libraries are referred to in this report, they will always be entities that areinformational resources within degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the United States,including institutions that are eligible for Title IV aid and branch campuses of Title IV-eligibleinstitutions.NCES has conducted the ALS since 1966 at various intervals. However, beginning with the 1988survey, the ALS has been conducted on a 2-year cycle. The survey focuses on library services,collections, library staff, expenditures, electronic services, and information literacy.Because the purpose of this report is to introduce new NCES data through the presentation oftables containing descriptive information, only selected findings are presented. These findingshave been chosen to demonstrate the range of information available from the study rather than todiscuss all of the observed differences or focus on any particular issue.Three appendixes follow this report. Appendix A contains technical notes, survey methodology,and methodological tables. Appendix B contains the glossary. Appendix C contains the surveyquestionnaire and instructions.1

Selected FindingsServices Academic libraries loaned some 11.2 million documents to other libraries in fiscal year 2010 (table1). Academic libraries also borrowed approximately 10.2 million documents from other libraries andcommercial services. Documents from commercial services accounted for about 176,000 of thosedocuments borrowed. The majority of academic libraries, 2,440, were open between 60-99 hours during a typical weekin fall of 2010 (derived from table 2). Another 559 academic libraries were open 100 or morehours per typical week. In fiscal year 2010, academic libraries conducted approximately 34.6 million informationservices to individuals,1 including computer searches (table 3).Collections At the end of fiscal year 2010, there were 227 academic libraries that held at least 1 million ormore books, serial backfiles, and other paper materials including government documents (table4). Academic libraries held approximately 158.7 million e-books and about 1.8 million electronicreference sources and aggregation services1 at the end of fiscal year 2010 (table 5).In fiscal year 2010, academic libraries added about 12.9 million audiovisual material units,making their total audiovisual material holdings over 1.12 billion units (tables 5 and 6).Staff Academic libraries reported 88,943 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff working in academiclibraries during the fall of 2010 (table 7).Academic libraries reported 26,706 FTE librarians working during the fall of 2010 (table 7).Librarians accounted for about 30 percent of the total number of FTE staff in academic librariesduring the fall of 2010.Expenditures Just under half of academic libraries, 1,739, had total expenditures of 500,000 or more in fiscalyear 2010 (derived from table 8). Another 581 academic libraries had total expenditures under 100,000 (derived from table 8). During fiscal year 2010, academic libraries spent about 3.4 billion on salaries and wages,representing approximately 50 percent of total library expenditures (table 9). Academic libraries spent approximately 152.4 million for electronic books, serial backfiles, andother materials in fiscal year 2010 (table 10). Expenditures for electronic current serialsubscriptions totaled about 1.2 billion.During fiscal year 2010, academic libraries spent approximately 142.7 million for computerhardware and software (table 11).Electronic Services In fall of 2010, about 41 percent of academic libraries reported providing documents digitized by staff(table 12). Over half (54 percent) reported providing technology to assist patrons with disabilities in fall of 2010(table 12).Virtual Reference During fiscal year 2010, some 72 percent of academic libraries reported that they supported virtualreference services (table 13). During fiscal year 2010, about 32 percent of academic libraries reported that they utilized instantmessaging applications (table 13).1See appendix C for definitions of information services to individuals and electronic reference sources andaggregation services.2

Tables3

Table 1. Total circulation, interlibrary loan transactions, and documents received from commercial services at academic libraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classificationTable 1. of institution: Fiscal year 2010Totalnumber 002,600,0791,680,40480,65895,792Level3Total 4-year and above4Doctor’sMaster’sBachelor’sLess than 49233,33360,865166,74888,55866,30111,8899,702Size (FTE enrollment)6Less than 1,0001,000 to 2,9993,000 to 4,9995,000 to 9,99910,000 to 19,99920,000 or 917,57435,32568,437Institutional characteristicAll U.S. academic librariesCirculationInterlibrary loan transactions and documents received from commercial servicesLoans provided to other librariesLoans and documents receivedNonNonFrom commercialTotal Returnablereturnable1Total Returnablereturnable1services24Carnegie classification3Doctoral/Research27569,397,995 4,2172,457,97566,754Master’s I and 46260,57425,524Not 10,34312,812981“Non-returnable” refers to materials that the supplier/lending library does not expect to have returned. Examples of non-returnables include photocopies or facsimiles, fiche-to-fiche copies, print copiesfrom microfilm, electronic full-text documents, and gratis print copies of unpublished reports and/or departmental working papers.2“Documents received from commercial services” refers to all documents from commercial document delivery services received by the library’s users. This includes all transactions that the library paysfor, even if library staff is not involved in the transaction, and includes documents bought from providers such as Infotrieve, Ingenta, CISTI Document Delivery, and Thomson Scientific - DocumentSolution.3While “Level” and “Carnegie classification” are similar, there is not complete overlap in the two classifications. “Level” refers to the highest level of any degree offered by the institution. The“Carnegie classification” is based on criteria such as institutional mission and research funding in addition to highest level of degree awarded. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of HigherEducation, 2005 Edition. Alexander C. McCormick. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2005.4The number of doctoral, master’s, and bachelor’s level institutions does not sum to the total number of 4-year and above institutions because there are 4-year and above institutions that grant otherdegrees and are thus not included in the breakdown.5“Less than 4-year” category refers to institutions that have at least a 2-year degree, but less than a 4-year degree (below the Baccalaureate degree).6“Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment” is calculated by adding one-third of part-time enrollment to full-time enrollment.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Academic Libraries Survey (ALS), 2010.

Table 2. Number of academic libraries, by public service hours per typical week, control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fall 2010Public service hours per typical weekTotal number ofacademic librariesLessthan 2020 - 3940 - 5960 - 7980 - 99100 - 119120 - 517Level2Total 4-year and above3Doctor’sMaster’sBachelor’sLess than 2918833Size (FTE enrollment)5Less than 1,0001,000 to 2,9993,000 to 4,9995,000 to 9,99910,000 to 19,99920,000 or 111228393635411Institutional characteristicAll U.S. academic libraries5Carnegie er's I and 7171340884973109Specialized58021412128398537Not classified2271116613113221These libraries are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.2While "Level" and "Carnegie classification" are similar, there is not complete overlap in the two classifications. "Level" refers to the highest level of any degree offered by the institution. The"Carnegie classification" is based on criteria such as institutional mission and research funding in addition to highest level of degree awarded. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of HigherEducation, 2005 Edition. Alexander C. McCormick. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2005.3The number of doctoral, master's, and bachelor's level institutions does not sum to the total number of 4-year and above institutions because there are 4-year and above institutions that grant otherdegrees and are thus not included in the breakdown.4Less than 4-year category refers to institutions that have at least a 2-year degree, but less than a 4-year degree (below the Baccalaureate degree).5Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment is calculated by adding one-third of part-time enrollment to full-time enrollment.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Academic Libraries Survey (ALS), 2010.11970221

Table 3. Gate count, and total information services to individuals and groups, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010Total number ofacademic librariesGate count1during typical weekin fall 2010Total informationservices to individuals2fiscal year l3Total 4-year and above4Doctor’sMaster’sBachelor’sLess than e (FTE enrollment)6Less than 1,0001,000 to 2,9993,000 to 4,9995,000 to 9,99910,000 to 19,99920,000 or 31,6792,149,6662,295,357Institutional characteristicAll U.S. academic librariesInformation services to groups, fiscal year 2010Total number ofTotal numberservedpresentations6Carnegie 352160,0942,895,089Master's I and 2,202,13224,921428,695SpecializedNot classified227167,657402,4907,961125,3721"Gate count" is the number of persons who physically enter library facilities over the course of a typical week.2"Information services to individuals" is the number of information contacts that involve the knowledge, use, recommendation, interpretation, or instruction in the use of one or more information sourcesby a member of the library staff.3While "Level" and "Carnegie classification" are similar, there is not complete overlap in the two classifications. "Level" refers to the highest level of any degree offered by the institution. The"Carnegie classification" is based on criteria such as institutional mission and research funding in addition to highest level of degree awarded. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of HigherEducation, 2005 Edition. Alexander C. McCormick. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2005.4The number of doctoral, master's, and bachelor's level institutions does not sum to the total number of 4-year and above institutions because there are 4-year and above institutions that grant otherdegrees and are thus not included in the breakdown.5Less than 4-year category refers to institutions that have at least a 2-year degree, but less than a 4-year degree (below the Baccalaureate degree).6Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment is calculated by adding one-third of part-time enrollment to full-time enrollment.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Academic Libraries Survey (ALS), 2010.

Table 4. Volumes held at end of fiscal year and number of academic libraries, by number of books, serial backfiles, and other paper materials including government documents,Table 4. control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institutions: Fiscal year 2010Institutional characteristicAll U.S. academic librariesControlPublicPrivateLevel1Total 4-year and above2Doctor’sMaster’sBachelor’sLess than 4-year37Size (FTE enrollment)4Less than 1,0001,000 to 2,9993,000 to 4,9995,000 to 9,99910,000 to 19,99920,000 or moreNumber of academic librariesNumber of books, serial backfiles, and other paper materials including government documents5,000 to 10,000 to 20,000 to 30,000 to 50,000 to 100,000 to 250,000 to 500,000 99Volumesheld at endof fiscal year TotalLess than5,0001,076,027,407 3,689592177227197445663691293177227654,864,528 1,559421,162,879 11265159681,021,831,451 95,956 193561769558231227213104051,574,505 1,236136,323,737 6713521654781743086991,000,000or moreCarnegie 13172432190Master’s I and 53,885 806847754512685953540Not classified2,455,992227165279213740001While “Level” and “Carnegie classification” are similar, there is not complete overlap in the two classifications. “Level” refers to the highest level of any degree offered by the institution. The“Carnegie classification” is based on criteria such as institutional mission and research funding in addition to highest level of degree awarded. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of HigherEducation, 2005 Edition. Alexander C. McCormick. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2005.2The number of doctoral, master’s, and bachelor’s level institutions does not sum to the total number of 4-year and above institutions because there are 4-year and above institutions that grant otherdegrees and are thus not included in the breakdown.3“Less than 4-year” category refers to institutions that have at least a 2-year degree, but less than a 4-year degree (below the Baccalaureate degree).4“Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment” is calculated by adding one-third of part-time enrollment to full-time enrollment.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Academic Libraries Survey (ALS), 2010.

Table 5. Number of volumes, units, and subscriptions held at the end of the fiscal year at academic libraries, by control, level, size, and Carnegie classification of institution: Fiscal year 2010Totalnumber ofacademiclibrariesBooks, serial backfiles,and other papermaterials, includinggovernment unitsCurrent onic referencesources andaggregation ,048Level2Total 4-year and above3Doctor’sMaster’sBachelor’sLess than 62,479193,439162,402Size (FTE enrollment)5Less than 1,0001,000 to 2,9993,000 to 4,9995,000 to 9,99910,000 to 19,99920,000 or 323,217265,340Institutional characteristicAll U.S. academic libraries8Carnegie ’s I and Not 816,7521“Electronic reference sources, and aggregation services” include citation indexes and abstracts; full-text reference sources (e.g., encyclopedias, almanacs, biographical and statistical sources, and otherquick fact-finding sources); full-text journal and periodical article collection services (e.g., EBSCOhost, ProQuest, Academic Universe, and INFOTRAC OneFile); and dissertation and conferenceproceedings databases. Licensed electronic resources also include those databases that institutions mount locally.2While “Level” and “Carnegie classification” are similar, there is not complete overlap in the two classifications. “Level” refers to the highest level of any degree offered by the institution. The“Carnegie classification” is based on criteria such as institutional mission and research funding in addition to

the study were as follows: C. Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University Libraries; Terri Fishel, Macalester College Library; Kit Keller, ALA Consultant; Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries; William Miller and Rita Pellen, Florida Atlantic University Libraries; Kenley Neufeld, Santa Barbara City College; Patricia Profeta, Indian River .

Related Documents:

Academic libraries loaned some 10.5 million documents to other libraries in fiscal year 2012 (table 1). Academic libraries also borrowed approximately 9.8 million documents from other libraries and commercial services. The majority of academic libraries, 2,417, were open between 60-99 hours during a

Tip 1: How to use Agilent 82357B USB/GPIB converter in NI’s MAX or LabVIEW? Figure 2. Typical setup for Agilent IO Libraries Suite. 1 Agilent I/O Libraries Each Agilent IO product is bundled with the Agilent I/O libraries. There are four I/O libraries included in Agilent IO libraries Suite: Agilent

8 Grand Valley State University (USA) G.V.S.U. Libraries 9 Harvard University (USA) Harvard University Libraries Office of Scholarly Communication 10 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA) MIT Libraries 11 Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada) Memorial University Libraries 12 Simon Fraser University (Canada)

5 HIGHLIGHTS ARL ACADEMIC LAW LIBRARY STATISTICS, 2002-03 Out of 113 ARL university libraries, 75 responded to this survey.1 Law libraries reported median values of 304,887 volumes held and 8,248 volumes added. Also, these libraries employed the full-time equivalent of 2,243 staff members in the fiscal year 2002-03. Responding libraries

ACRL ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN Introduction and Methodology The 2015 Environmental Scan of Academic Libraries is the product of ACRL’s Research Planning and Review Committee. In 2014 the committee produced the “Top Trends in Academic Libraries,” published in College and Research Libraries News (Middleton et al. 2014).

academic libraries. Measure visitor interactions at touch points in the library. Generate information on how public and academic libraries in the Chicago area can better service and educate their visitors, thereby creating a more satisfying library visit. Research Objectives Research Methodology Four libraries in the Chicago area were

Within academic libraries, “ebooks” is a fairly nebulous concept, unlike the generally distinct meaning it has in, say, public libraries, where an “ebook” can be essentially defined as an electronic version of a book you would once have been able to find in print at your

The Adventure Tourism Development Index (ATDI) is a joint initiative of The George Washington University and The Adventure Travel Trade Association (ATTA). The ATDI offers a ranking of countries around the world based on principles of sustainable adventure tourism