Welcome – to aWATERSHED Event!Long-Term Flood Resiliency for Communities:A Watershed Management ApproachApril 16, 2015Kim SherwoodWatershed Consultantfrom Chautauqua County, NY
WATERSHEDS—THE FUNNEL, THESPONGE, AND THE SLIDE
Who Cares?
Why You Might Care
Why You Might Care Flooddamage – homes, property,cropland, etc.
Why You Might Care Flooddamage – homes, property,cropland, etc. Landowner complaints
Why You Might Care Flooddamage – homes, property,cropland, etc. Landowner complaints Groundwater quality & quantity
Why You Might Care Flooddamage – homes, property,cropland, etc. Landowner complaints Groundwater quality & quantity Jobsarea& Quality-of-life issues for growing
Why You Might Care Flooddamage – homes, property,cropland, etc. Landowner complaints Groundwater quality & quantity Jobsarea& Quality-of-life issues for growing MUNICIPALCOSTS
What Is AWatershed?
Ridgeline
PrecipitationRidgeline
waterRunoff
PrecipitationTributariesRidgelineAgricultureRural noff
Who’s ‘in-charge’ -of watershed management?Photo: Rick Constantino
NorthLake HEDMill CreekChautauqua – Conneaut WatershedagasadCas ekCreClear CreekMud RunLittle Conewango CreekUpper AlleganyWatershedFrench CreekWatershedCterreekallwStiUpper Allegany WatershedMOUTH
Chautauqua CountyNorthLake ErieCattaraugus RSHEDMill CreekChautauqua – Conneaut WatershedagasadCas ekCreClear CreekMud RunLittle Conewango CreekUpper AlleganyWatershedFrench CreekWatershedCterreekallwStiUpper Allegany WatershedWarrenCountyMOUTHNYPA
NorthLake HEDMill CreekChautauqua – Conneaut WatershedagasadCas ekCreClear CreekMud RunLittle Conewango CreekUpper AlleganyWatershedFrench CreekWatershedCterreekallwStiUpper Allegany WatershedMOUTHNYNYPAPA
Hypothetical WatershedStream Network
Factors Influencing Stream Runoff(Water Quantity & Quality) Upland Watershed Factorswatershed size and shapeprecipitationgeology & soilsvegetationland useimpervious covergroundwater storage
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Soils, Vegetation& Land Use
Compaction EffectsRate of Water Movement (in /hr)Water Movement Into Soils in Various SettingsOcean County,Avg. Annual Precipitation 50NJinches1615129.987.1400.1WoodsPastureSource: Ocean County Soil Conservation District, June 2001Single HouseSubdivision Lawn 1
Impervious Cover
Impervious Cover
GroundwaterStorageLoss
Municipal Costs
Municipal Costs
Factors Influencing Stream Runoff(Water Quantity & Quality) Stream, Time and Space Factorschannel characteristicsriparian functionfloodplain functionwatershed “plumbing”time & space
Channel Characteristics
Channel CharacteristicsHeadwater streams: 80% of any watershed Small & steep high energy Source of sediment & debris
Channel CharacteristicsHeadwater streams: 80% of any watershed Small & steep high energy Source of sediment & debris
Channel Characteristics
Channel CharacteristicsLowland Streams: Historically meandered Relatively large & flat Deposition areas –sediment & debris
Riparian Function NRCS
Riparian FunctionFunctional Riparian Zones: Reduce Erosion Filter Pollutants Provide Fish & Wildlife Habitat NRCS
Floodplain Function
Floodplain FunctionFunctional floodplains: Reduce stream energy & erosion Absorb excess water Slowly release water to the stream
Floodplain FunctionFunctional floodplains: Reduce stream energy & erosion Absorb excess water Slowly release water to the stream
Watershed Plumbing
Watershed Plumbing
Changes in Time & SpaceA local example
Lakewood NY, 1938 & 2004
Lakewood NY, 1938 & 2004
Lakewood NY, 1938 & 2004
Cumulative Effects
Cumulative EffectsSCENARIO A:Development Proposal: 20 New Homes - 20 acres All within the same watershed Constructed in 2015Triggers: SEQR NYS DEC SWPPPMunicipal Discussions? Wastewater Management Emergency Services, etc.
Cumulative EffectsSCENARIO B-1 (2015): 10 Existing Homes – 10 acres
Cumulative EffectsSCENARIO B-2 (2017): 10 Existing Homes – 10 acresNo Proposal: 3 Additional Homes - 3 acres All within the same watershedTriggers:Municipal Discussions?
Cumulative EffectsSCENARIO B-3 (2020): 10 Existing Homes – 10 acresNo Proposal: 4 Additional Homes - 4 acres All within the same watershedTriggers:Municipal Discussions?
Cumulative EffectsSCENARIO B-4 (2023): 10 Existing Homes – 10 acresNo Proposal: 3 Additional Homes - 3 acres All within the same watershedTriggers:Municipal Discussions?
Cumulative EffectsIndividually minor, but cumulatively significant effects
Factors Influencing Stream Runoff(Water Quantity & Quality) Stream runoff is influenced by inherent and changedupland and stream characteristics of the watershed: watershed size and shapeprecipitationgeology & soilsvegetation & land useimpervious covergroundwater storagechannel characteristicsriparian functionfloodplain functionwatershed plumbingtime & space
Municipal CostsRebuilt 5 timesIn 3 years: 15,000Stabilized in 2005: 3,500
Municipal Costs BenefitsRebuilt 5 timesIn 3 years: 15,000Stabilized in 2005: 3,500Until 2009: 0
The Eight Tools ofWatershed “Investment”
Who’s ‘in-charge’ -of watershed management? Mayors/ Supervisors Business Owners Conservation Groups Planning / Zoning Highway Departments NYS DEC Private Landowners All Of The AbovePhoto: Rick Constantino
A Lesson Learned.the Hard Way
Thanks for your time!
CommentsorQuestions?
Thank You.
Roundtable Discussions Group Introductions, flooding stories, lessons learned Group Homework (20 minutes)Choose 1 (or more) from handout; discuss Report Discussion (10 minutes)Back (2 minutes / group)Choose a Discussion or Homework topic; reportyour group’s issue / concern
Upper Allegany Watershed Upper Allegany Watershed North Branch Mill Creek Mud Run Cassadaga Creek Clear Creek Stillwater Creek MOUTH Little Conewango Creek Lake Erie CONEWANGO CREEK WATERSHED. NY PA . watershed plumbing time & space. Municipal Costs Rebuilt 5 times In 3 years: 15,000 Stabilized in 2005: 3,500 . Municipal Costs Benefits
Event 406 - Windows Server 2019 58 Event 410 58 Event 411 59 Event 412 60 Event 413 60 Event 418 60 Event 420 61 Event 424 61 Event 431 61 Event 512 62 Event 513 62 Event 515 63 Event 516 63 Event 1102 64 Event 1200 64 Event 1201 64 Event 1202 64 Event 1203 64 Event 1204 64
Three separate watershed assessments were performed to guide the development of a watershed management plan for the North Branch Park River: 1) a Baseline Watershed Assessment, 2) a Watershed Field Assessment, and 3) a Land Use Regulatory Review. The Baseline Watershed Assessment evaluates the existing environmental and land use conditions in
Watershed, a watershed that flows toward the Columbia River. In this way, one watershed is artificially connected to several other watersheds at once. The watershed of surface flow, the watershed where domestic water originates, and the watershed where wastewater goes
Baseline Watershed Assessment North Branch Park River Watershed Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection July 2010 146 Hartford Road Manchester, Connecticut 06040 In Cooperation With: Farmington River Watershed Association Park River Watershed Revitalization Initiative
the Genesee County Soil and Water Conservation Districts’s prior experience with watershed collaboration will be a great help in this planning effort. They will be able to share their knowledge in the formation and direction of this watershed alliance. The watershed alliance is the first phase of a multi-phased watershed project that will benefit
Corte Madera Creek Watershed Infiltration and Storage Assessment (FOCMC 2m) Corte Madera Creek Watershed Sediment Control and Drinking Water Reliability Project (MMWD 1.2m) Corte Madera Creek Watershed: Barriers to Fish Passage in Sleepy Hollow Creek (San Anselmo 2m) Corte Madera Creek Watershed: Saunders Fish Barrier Removal(San Anselmo 2m)
Part I: Upper & North Fork Big Hole River Watershed Page 11 Watershed Restoration Planning A Watershed Restoration Plan is a guiding document that outlines watershed restoration goals and needs to address non-point source pollution. The plan describes actions to occur over a 3 -5 year period. It is designed to be a working
Marxism is a highly complex subject, and that sector of it known as Marxist literary criticism is no less so. It would therefore be impossible in this short study to do more than broach a few basic issues and raise some fundamental questions. (The book is as short as it is, incidentally, because it was originally designed for a series of brief introductory studies.) The danger with books of .