Fifth Annual Report Of The Bariatric Surgery Registry - Monash University

1y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
724.01 KB
40 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Anton Mixon
Transcription

JUNE2017Fifth Annual Report of theBariatric Surgery Registry

Funding PartnersThe Bariatric Surgery Registry received funding in thelast 12 months from the Commonwealth Government ofAustralia and the following supporters2Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

Table of ContentsList of Figures4List of Tables5Foreword from Chair of Steering Committee6List of Abbreviations7Data Period8Common Terms8Executive Summary9Background10Rationale for Registry & Registry Collaborators10Registry Governance12Registry Methodology13Results of the Bariatric Surgery Registry as at 30 June 2017151 » Enrolment in the registry152 » Procedures captured by the registry16Primary PatientsLegacy Patients20233 » Demographics244 » Follow-up265 » Safety reporting27DeathsPeri-operative Defined Adverse Events and ComplicationsNeed for Reoperation for Primary Patients2727296 » Weight outcomes307 » Diabetes outcomes33Conclusions35Acknowledgements35Appendix – Data Elements Captured36Appendix – Hospitals with Ethics Approval in BSR37Appendix – Data Collection Process38References39Fifth report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 20173

List of Figures4Figure 1» Rate of Obesity in Australia (1995 to 2015)10Figure 2» MBS Data on Number of Bariatric Procedures in Australia11Figure 3» Hospitals and Surgeons Performing Bariatric Surgery in Australia as at 30 June 201713Figure 4» Accumulation Rate of Patients Participating in the BSR by Patient Type15Figure 5» Change in Procedure Type Captured by BSR17Figure 6» Procedures Captured by the BSR by State and Procedure Type (FY16/17)17Figure 7» Procedures Captured by the BSR by State and Public/Private (FY16/17)18Figure 8» Primary and Revision Procedures Captured by the BSR Public/Private (FY16/17)19Figure 9» Revision Incidence Rates for Primary Bariatric Procedures as at 30 June 201721Figure 10» Patients’ Age Distribution at Time of Procedure in the BSR (FY16/17)25Figure 11» Patients’ BMI Distribution at Time of Procedure in the BSR (FY16/17)25Figure 12» Patients’ Weight at Time of Procedure in the BSR (FY16/17)26Figure 13» Reasons Listed for Defined Adverse Events in all Patients (FY16/17)29Figure 14» Reasons Listed for Reoperations on Primary Patients (FY16/17)29Figure 15» Excess Weight Loss for those Primary Patients who have reached their 3 Year Annual Follow-Up31Figure 16» Total Weight Loss for those Primary Patients who have reached their 3 Year Annual Follow-Up31Figure 17» Weight loss at Three Years Post-Primary Procedure as at 30 June 201732Figure 18» Primary Patients’ Identifying as having Diabetes and Treatment at Primary Procedure Feb 2012 to 30 June 201734Fifth report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

List of TablesTable 1» Patient Participation in the BSR Over Time15Table 2» Procedures Performed by Type16Table 3» Procedures Captured in BSR by State (FY16/17)18Table 4» Procedures Performed in Public Hospitals19Table 5» Concurrent Renal Transplants20Table 6» Primary Procedures in BSR by Type20Table 7» Number of Procedures Undergone by Primary Patients (Feb 2012 to 30 June 2017)21Table 8A   » Current Status of Sleeve Gastrectomy Primary Patients as at 30 June 201722Table 8B   » C urrent Status of Gastric Banding Primary Patients as at 30 June 201722Table 8C   » Current Status of RY Gastric Bypass Primary Patients as at 30 June 201722Table 8D   » Current Status of Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Primary Patients as at 30 June 201722Table 9» Number of Procedures Undergone by Legacy Patients (Feb 2012 to 30 June 2017)23Table 10» Demographics of Patients at their Procedure (FY16/17)24Table 11» Follow-Up Completion by Type (Excluding LTFU)26Table 12» Deaths Reported to the BSR up to 30 June 201727Table 13» Cause of Death that was Likely Related to Bariatric Procedure up to 30 June 201727Table 14» Defined Adverse Events in All Patients up to 30 June 201727Table 15» Primary Procedures by Type with a Defined Adverse Events (FY16/17)28Table 16» Revision Procedures by Type with a Defined Adverse Events (FY16/17)28Table 17» Mean BMI for all Primary Procedures Feb 2012 to 30 June 201730Table 18» Weight Outcomes at 12 Months for all Primary Procedures Feb 2012 to 30 June 201730Table 19» Primary Patients Identifying as Having Diabetes at Baseline Feb 2012 to 30 June 201733Table 20» Treatment for Diabetes at Baseline Feb 2012 to 30 June 201733Table 21» Treatment of Patients with Diabetes Reported at Baseline Followed up at 12 Months34Fifth report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 20175

Foreword from Chairof Steering CommitteeProfessor Ian CatersonThe BSR is getting bigger and bigger and we now have 28,308 patients in theBSR and over the last year have added 12,665 patients. As well we now have 92hospitals and 146 surgeons contributing. All this is a credit to those who contribute,giving their and their staff’s time – we really appreciate this.We are reaching the stage with the BSR where we are able to get large scale,meaningful data on quality and safety, and outcomes from the registry. This willguide the provision of bariatric surgery for the future and will help by ensuring thatthe procedure(s) becomes even safer than it is now. My personal hope is that in timewe will be able to give data which will enable better individual outcomes for patients,by enabling better and appropriate patient selection and appropriate operations.The field of bariatric surgery is evolving rapidly with new operations and proceduresappearing on a regular basis. The BSR will allow us to ensure that these newerprocedures are effective and safe.What is also emerging is the difficulty of getting the longer term follow-up. We needto work with the contributors and the patients to make sure we have a system thatgets this important data. We are aiming for greater than 95% continuing follow-up!Of course the BSR is only as good as the contributions it gets and we are reallyappreciative of the efforts of so many people – however, please help us to getfollow-up.Finally we must thank the staff of the BSR. They are doing a wonderful job, arealways cheerful and helpful (so ring if you have issues, please) and they are makingsure that this registry works, works well and will make important contributions tohealth care in obesity. Very many thanks are due to them for their efforts which goabove and beyond their duties.Professor Ian D Caterson6Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

List ofAbbreviationsANZGOSAAustralia and New Zealand Gastro-Oesophageal Surgery AssociationACSQHCAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health CareAMAAustralian Medical AssociationBMIBody Mass IndexBPD/DSBilio-Pancreatic Diversion with Duodenal SwitchBSRBariatric Surgery RegistryDOSDay Of SurgeryFYFinancial YearICUIntensive Care UnitITInformation TechnologyLAGBLaparoscopic Adjustable Gastric BandingLSGLaparoscopic Sleeve GastrectomyLTFULost To Follow-UpMBSMedical Benefits ScheduleNSWNew South WalesNZNew ZealandOPOperationOSSANZThe Obesity Surgery Society of Australia and New ZealandQLDQueenslandRACSRoyal Australasian College of SurgeonsRYGBRoux-Y Gastric BypassSASouth AustraliaSAGBSingle Anastomosis Gastric BypassSPHPMSchool of Public Health and Preventive MedicineST DEVStandard DeviationTASTasmaniaVICVictoriaWAWestern AustraliaFifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 20177

Data PeriodThe data contained in this document were extracted from the Bariatric Surgery Registry (BSR) as at 28 July 2017 but pertains toprocedures that have occurred up to 30 June 2017. As the Registry does not capture data in real time, there can be a lag betweenthe occurrence of an event and its capture in the BSR.Common Terms and definitionsPrimary patientsObesityPeri-operative Follow-Upparticipants whose first entryinto the Registry is with their firstbariatric surgical proceduredefined as having a bodymass index (BMI, kg/m2) of30 or over (Class I Obesity)patient observation from anyvisit between 20-90 dayspost-operative (previouslycalled 30 day follow-up)Legacy patientsSevere Obesityparticipants whose first entryinto the Registry is with asubsequent (or revision)bariatric surgical proceduredefined as having a bodymass index (BMI, kg/m2) of35 or over (Class II Obesity)Annual Follow-Uppatient observation taken fromany visit on an annual basisfrom the Primary operationMorbid ObesityPrimary procedurethe first bariatric procedureperformed upon a patientdefined as having a bodymass index (BMI, kg/m2) of 40or over (Class III Obesity)Revision procedureInitial Weighta subsequent bariatric procedureperformed upon a patient whohas had a primary proceduretaken as the higher of the weightat Intention to Treat or weight atOperation of a Primary PatientOpt-outExcess Weight Loss (EWL)patients who have been sentExplanatory Statements and whohave elected to not have theirdata included in the Registrymeasure of the percentage ofexcess weight a patient has lostfrom one time point to anotherwhere excess weight is defined asthe patient’s initial weight minustheir ideal weight at BMI 25Partial opt-outpatients who have been sentExplanatory Statements andwill allow the BSR to keep theirinformation but do not want tobe contacted by the Registry8Defined Adverse Event(previously called sentinel event)indicated by the presence ofa particular event occurring inthe peri-operative phase (upto 90 days) in the healthcaresetting, these are described as:1. Unplanned Return to Theatre2. Unplanned Admissionto ICU3. Unplanned Re-admissionto HospitalFinanical Yeardefined as the Australian financialyear from 1 July to 30 Junethe following calendar yearTotal Weight Loss (TWL)measure of the percentage ofweight a patient has lost fromone time point to another. Inthe BSR this is measured fromthe patient’s initial weightFifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

ExecutiveSummaryThe Bariatric Surgery Registry (BSR) is proud to present its FifthAnnual Report as at 30 June 2017. The BSR has enjoyed anotheryear of growth nearly doubling the registry to just under 30,000patients. During the period the BSR welcomed the finalisationof agreements with both the HealthScope and Ramsay Healthhospital groups. On the back of this the BSR was able to add 24sites and 33 surgeons to its contributors.The cohort of new patients acquired during the financial year2016/17 (FY16/17) remains predominantly female (80%), in theirmid-forties (mean age of 43.9 years), have their procedure ina private hospital (90%) and if they are a primary patient, theirmean BMI on day of surgery is 42.9 and 14% of them identifyas having diabetes.Over 22,000 of the participating patients are primary patientsand their progress will be tracked annually throughout 10 yearsof their bariatric journey including collection of their weight,diabetes treatment and reoperation history. There are currentlymore than 10,000 primary patients who have been followed upone year after their initial surgery while 78 patients have reachedtheir 5 year mark.Sleeve Gastrectomies have risen to 65% of all procedures inFY16/17 from 59% in FY15/16 with Gastric Bands falling furtherfrom 14% to 9%. A number of the BSR’s original bandingpatients have converted their bands to sleeves (1%) and theBSR will continue to follow these treatment pathways as theyemerge.The rate of death from bariatric surgery remains low with 5cases likely to be related to the procedure and 11 yet to bedetermined. In the peri-operative period, 2.4% of primaryprocedures for which there is a peri-operative follow-up and7.3% of revision procedures had a Defined Adverse Event(unplanned return to theatre, admission to ICU or re-admissionto hospital). In the primary patient cohort, 641 of them required arevision procedure (866 revisions in total) which represents 2.9%of the cohort.Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017In this year’s report the BSR is publishing Total Excess WeightLoss (TWL) and the Excess Weight Loss (EWL) findings. EWLremains similar to last year for the 887 patients who have reachedtheir 3 year review with EWL of 49.7%. TWL in the same cohortis 19.7%. The 12 month EWL is significantly higher at 62.8% thisyear. This most likely reflects the fact that more patients haveundergone a sleeve gastrectomy. Weight loss usually peaks at12-18 months with some weight regain expected after this time.By comparison patients who have undergone Gastric Bandingtend to lose weight more gradually. It is expected that the nextreport will contain sufficient patients at each time point to see ifthis trajectory is borne out in the population.For the cohort of primary patients identifying as having diabetesat baseline, it has been pleasing to note that 38% no longeridentify as having diabetes 12 months after surgery. Thiscontinues to be an encouraging outcome and one which theBSR will continue to monitor.Roll out of the BSR across Australia nears its end with only 26more sites (17% of all sites where bariatric surgery is known tooccur) requiring ethics approval and 39 surgeons to bring onboard. The coming year will see the BSR working hard to acquirethese final sites and surgeons. As well, the BSR is launchingin New Zealand through a partnership with the University ofAuckland and the support of OSSANZ.The BSR plans to improve its data capture systems througha number of IT projects including the extraction of data forannual follow-up through surgeon’s software, a new Call Centremanagement system, data linkages with State Governments,direct bulk loading of data into the BSR and the development ofan SMS/ Secure Portal Platform. It is hoped these improvementsin data capture will decrease the workload on surgeons whileimproving both cost efficiency and data quality. This will serve asa springboard for the on-going sustainability of the BSR.9

BackgroundRationale for Registry & Registry CollaboratorsObesity is one of the major challenges facing the Australianand New Zealand community. The incidence of obesity hascontinued to increase over the last two decades.The Australian Federal Parliament recognised the need toaddress this issue in 2009 in the Georganas Report – Weighingit Up i, describing the increasing obese and overweightpopulation as a “pressing health concern for Australia”. At thattime it was estimated that 24.6% of the adult population ofAustralia were obese.Seven years later, the AMA went further in their PositionStatement on Obesityii in 2016 . With nearly 5 million Australianadults now estimated to be obese (27.9%), they describedthe situation as a “crisis” and called for the management ofthis disease to be a national and economic priority where “awhole of society response to obesity should be strategic, andcoordinated”.Research has shown that obesity is a difficult condition to preventand treat. For the 6 million Australians who are overweight (BMI25-30) and at risk of becoming obese, prevention strategies arecritical. But for the 5 million Australians who are already obese(BMI 30), effective treatment options are required and to date,they appear to be limited. There is some evidence that the 1.5million Australians with severe obesity (BMI 35) may benefitfrom bariatric surgery as it provides more predictable anddurable weight loss than conservative regimes and is generallyvery safeiii. This has led to an increase in bariatric surgery ofmore than 63% in just the last four years. Largely fundedprivately (88% procedures in the BSR are private), Australiansare choosing this treatment option.Figure 1 » Rate of Obesity in Australia (1995 to 2015)30%Male25%Female20%Total Obese15%10%5%0%19952007-082014-15Source: ABS- National Health Survey: First Results, 2014–15 & Overweight & Obesity in Adults in Australia: A Snapshot, 2007-0810Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

Figure 2 » MBS Data on Number of Bariatric Procedures in /15FY15/16FY16/17Source: MBS Medicare Items Processed for Major Bariatric Procedures - Gastric Band, SLeeve Gastrectomy RYGB/SAGBGeorganas ReportRecommendation 6:“ the Minister for Health and Ageing developa national register of bariatric surgery withthe appropriate stakeholders. The registershould capture data on the number of patients,the success of surgery and any possiblecomplications. The data that is generatedshould be used to track the long-term successand cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery.”It was in this context that the Obesity Surgery Society of Australiaand New Zealand (OSSANZ) auspiced the Bariatric SurgeryRegistry (BSR) in 2012. The Georganas Report had directlyrecommended such a registry and the profession respondedpiloting the BSR in Victoria. The Commonwealth Governmentprovided 4 years of funding (May 2014-2018) to rollout the BSRacross the 151 sites and 181 surgeons across Australia thatundertake bariatric surgery.As a clinical quality and safety registry, the BSR seeks to answer:1. Is this treatment safe?2. Is this treatment effective?The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in HealthCare (ACSQHC) promotes clinical quality registries as they areknown to drive change and lead to improved patient careand outcomesiv. In addition to benchmarking performance anddetermining variations in clinical outcomes, the data collectedby the BSR can also track the longitudinal health outcomesof bariatric patients. This provides a unique opportunity todetermine the effectiveness of this surgery upon the patients’obesity, diabetes management and the on-going need forfurther surgery over a ten year period.Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 201711

To do this, the BSR has been designed with the underlyingprinciple to provide data that is accurate, complete and valuable.To drive change and improve care, there must be confidence thatthe data is reflecting reality. The data governance framework ofthe BSR has been designed to control the definition, collection,verification, storage, analysis and reporting of data to ensure itsaccuracy and completeness.AccuratePopultaionCompleteIn addition, stakeholders must find the data valuable – it hasto answer the pressing questions they have about resourceallocation, how to improve outcomes, effectiveness or risks.To this end, the BSR has collaborated with governments,surgeons, private hospital groups, individual hospitals, themedical technology industry, private insurers and medicaldefence organisations to determine their needs and developreporting that delivers value. Most importantly, the BSR has alsobegun to speak directly with patients to understand their needsand how engagement with the Registry can help them in theirdecision making, assessment of risk and on-going journey oftreatment.ValuableLongitudinalRegistry GovernanceA Steering Committee was formed and met for the first time inFebruary 2012. The Steering Committee has continued to meetquarterly since. The Chair is an independent obesity expert,Professor Ian Caterson. Current membership includes:»» OSSANZ – Prof Wendy Brown (Clinical Lead),Mr Andrew MacCormick, Emeritus Prof Paul O’Brien»» RACS – Ms Meron Pitcher»» Australia and NZ Gastro-Oesophageal SurgicalAssociation (ANZGOSA) – Prof Neil Merrett»» Medical Technology Association ofAustralia (MTAA) – Edwin Ho»» Custodian/ Epidemiologist – Prof John McNeil»» Australian Commonwealth Department ofHealth – Nathan Hyson»» Community Representative – Corinna MusgraveIn the five years the Steering Committee has been operating itsprimary role has been to oversee the governance of the BSR,provide strategic direction and ensure the agreed outcomesfrom the registry are achieved. To do this, it has worked with theBSR staff to develop a Data Governance Framework and theassociated policies and processes that underpin the »»»»»»»»Ethics ProtocolOutlier PolicyPrivacy PolicyGrievance & Complaint PolicyCall Centre Protocol & ScriptsData Access & Reporting PolicyData Dictionary (clinical & IT)BSR-i Business RulesData Element Variation ProcessesData Capture Variation ProcessesBSR-i System Change Request ProcessesReporting TemplatesThe Registry Custodian is the School of Public Health andPreventive Medicine (SPHPM) within the Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences at Monash University.12Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

Registry MethodologyParticipants – Site and Surgeon AccrualA call was made to all surgeon members of OSSANZ in June2013 asking them to register their interest in participating inthe Registry. A further call was made in June 2014. As a result,185 Australian surgeons registered their interest in the Registry(Figure 3). It is estimated there are another 24 surgeons who arecurrently performing bariatric surgery that have not registeredinterest with the Registry. In NZ, another 15 surgeons havebeen registered and are awaiting final locality approval to startcontributing data.Prior to commencing data collection at a given site, theRegistry requires approval from the relevant ethics committee.A Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU), naming the LocalInvestigator (a contributing surgeon at the site), is signedbetween the Registry and the hospital site. These documentsoutline the responsibilities and expectations of each party.In the year 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 an additional 41 siteshave been approved by their nominated ethics committees,bringing the total number of sites with ethics approval to 125as at 30 June 2017. It should be noted that this includes tensites that have either closed or have no surgeons currentlyperforming bariatric surgical procedures. The BSR estimatesthere are another 26 sites in Australia where bariatric proceduresare performed, but probably in small numbers, that are yet to beapproved by ethics.The BSR now has 92 sites and 146 surgeons contributing datato the Registry.Data ElementsThe need for near complete data capture is required to ensurethe reliability of the Registry. Hence, the data elements that arecurrently collected by the Registry include only those elementsthat were most reliably completed during the pilot study (20122014).The collected data provides information on the patient (to allowtracking and to identify risk factors), the patient’s weight andBMI, the patient’s health (diabetes status and treatment), thetype of surgery undertaken, whether a concurrent liver or renaltransplant took place, the device utilised, the need for revision orrepeat surgery, unplanned admissions to ICU or readmissions tohospital as well as mortality.Whilst it is possible to add further data elements in sub-studiesof the Registry, the current intention is for this minimal dataset toformulate the main “spine” of the Registry dataset. For the dataelements that are collected, please refer to the Appendix.Figure 3 » Hospitals and Surgeons Performing Bariatric Surgery in Australia as at 30 June 20172. HospitalsPerformingBariatricsn 151HospitalsApprovedby Ethicsn 125HospitalsContributingn 92Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 20171. SurgeonsRegisteredInterestn 185Surgeonsat SitesApprovedby Ethicsn 182SurgeonsContributingn 14613

Data Collection ProcessThe data collection process is summarised in the Appendix.Surgeons or hospital data collectors provide data about thepatients and their procedures using one of the following options:»» Web browser with secure authorised entry usingthe Bariatric Surgery Registry Interface (BSR-i)»» Paper based data forms (secure fax or posted)»» Secure electronic record transfer from surgeons’or hospitals’ electronic medical recordUpon receipt of this information the BSR sends the patientan Explanatory Statement about the Registry and theirparticipation. The patient has a two week period to opt-out ofthe Registry by calling a “Free-call 1800-number”. Patients havethe option to completely opt-out, meaning that no data is heldin the Registry other than that needed to identify them in thefuture should they have another procedure, or partially opt-out,meaning that they will allow their data to be held in the Registrybut they do not wish to be called or contacted by the Registry.It is important to note that patients have the right to opt-out atany time during the follow-up period. If the patient declines toparticipate, information apart from name, date of birth, name oftreating hospital and name of treating surgeon is deleted by theRegistry. These basic demographics are maintained on a “donot contact” list.Hospital Information Services (HIS) at each hospital siteprovide regular ICD-10 coding reports for bariatric proceduresperformed by surgeons who participate in the Registry. Thecoding reports include patient demographic and procedureinformation. These data are sent to the BSR using the securefile transfer platform (SFTP).ICD-10 coding reports provided by HIS are used to verify datasubmitted by surgeons/ hospital data collectors. If the surgeonor hospital has not previously provided information of a bariatricpatient, the reports are used as the primary source of data.When ICD-10 coding is the primary source, surgeons are askedto complete the missing data elements not made available fromthe hospitals (e.g. device/stapling information, whether it is aprimary or revision operation, height/ weight information anddiabetes treatment).Follow-up data are provided by surgeons or public hospitalclinics, either by return of a paper form or through submissionon the BSR-i. If surgeons or public data collectors indicatethey have not seen the participant, BSR Call Centre staff willcontact the participant for a brief 5 minute phone call (using setBSR Call Centre Protocols and Scripts) to collect the follow-upinformation related to the peri-operative period and/or 12 monthintervals after surgery. Five attempts are made to contact thepatient before they are allocated to “Lost to Follow-Up” (LTFU).The BSR plans to develop an SMS, email or web-basedsecure portal platform to contact participants to obtain followup information. This platform will invite participants to linkto a secure portal at various stages of their post-operativeexperience. If they do not respond to the request for followup, the Registry will call the participants. The SMS, email orwebsite platform will be designed to engage with participantsby providing useful information during their post-surgeryexperience and will allow them to give their own data back tothe Registry.Data ReportingThe BSR follows a reporting cycle throughout the year to provide valuable data back to the key stakeholders. These reports include:RELEASED TOREPORT TYPEREPORTINGPublicAnnual ReportAs at 30 June each yearPublicSemi-annual UpdateAs at 31 December each yearSurgeonIndividual Surgeon ReportsAs at 30 September each yearDevice Manufacturer (Funder)Individual Industry ReportsAs at 31 March each yearHospital Group (Participant)Hospital Group ReportsAs at 31 March each yearAs a clinical quality and safety registry, the BSR also reports on any identified outlier in accordance with the BSR’s Outlier Policy.14Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017

Results of the Bariatric SurgeryRegistry as at 30 June 20171 Enrolment in the RegistrySince commencement in February 2012, ExplanatoryStatements that invite patients to participate in the Registryhave been sent to a total of 30,120 patients who had theiroperation before or on 30 June 2017. There have been 1,146patients who have chosen to opt-out (3.8%) and 107 (0.4%)partial opt-out (although those who choose partial opt-out arestill considered participants). When the data was drawn on 28July 2017, a further 666 patients (2.2%) were still in the twoweek period where their participation was pending.This means there are currently 28,308 patients who areparticipating and have their information included in the Registry.This is the cohort on which this report is based.Table 1 » Patient Participation in the BSROver TimeParticipatingOpted OutOpt Out RateAS AT30 JUNE2015AS AT30 JUNE2016AS AT30 JUNE20175,78815,64328,308*2135541,1463.5%3.4%3.8%* Includes 44 patients who only had an abandoned procedureTable 1 illustrates that the BSR has grown nearly six-fold overthe last 24 months while maintaining an opt-out rate below 4%.Figure 4 » Accumulation Rate of Patients Participating in the BSR by Patient Type(February 2012 to 30th June 2017)30,000Feb 2012BSR Pilot beganNumber of patients25,000Primary Gastric banding(LAGB) patientsJuly 2014National roll-outPrimary Sleeve gastrectomy(LSG) patients20,00015,000Primary Other patients10,000Legacy patients5,00002012201320142015Fifth Report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 20172016201715

2 Procedures Captured by the RegistryThe BSR has captured 30,473 completed proceduresperformed on 28,264 participants. The BSR has also capturedanother 68 abandoned procedures. 44 of these abandonedprocedures involved participants who did not go on to have acompleted procedure.The types of procedures undertaken are also described in Table2. The mix of procedures captured by the BSR has changeddramatically over the last three years as shown in Figure 5.Sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) represents nearly two-thirds of allprocedures captured in FY16/17.In the last financial year 11,872 completed procedures havebeen captured by the BSR (Table 2). It is estimated that this isnearly half of the 21,216 procedures that occurred in Australiaover the same period (MBS figures). Of the three most popularprocedures, we captured 46% of LSG, 66% of LAGB and 65%of RYGB/SAGB*. This compares to the capture rate as at 30June 2016 of 40% of LSG, 68% of LAGB and 68% of RYGB/SAGB.Table 2 » Procedures Performed by TypeTOTAL BSR(Feb 2012 to 30 June 2017)PrimaryRevisionTotalPrimaryRevisionTotalMBS DATAFY16/17(Est of % collectedin brackets)15,4781,67017,1487,0686897,75716,990 (46%)Gastric Banding (LAGB)4,5281,3005,8288352601,0951,650 (66%)R-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)1,2761,5172,7935216161,1372,576 (65%)6784581,136338201539Surgical Revers

4 Fifth report of the Bariatric Surgery Registry June 2017 List of Figures Figure 1 » Rate of Obesity in Australia (1995 to 2015) 10 Figure 2 » MBS Data on Number of Bariatric Procedures in Australia 11 Figure 3 » Hospitals and Surgeons Performing Bariatric Surgery in Australia as at 30 June 2017 13 Figure 4 » Accumulation Rate of Patients Participating in the BSR by Patient Type 15

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

fifth wheel king pin jost kz1006 kz1012-01 20.10001 fifth wheel lock claw jost sk1489 sk1489z 20.10002 fifth wheel lock claw jost sk1489zs 20.10021 fifth wheel lock jaw jost sk210515 20.10026 fifth wheel lock jaw jost sk240514 20.10027 fifth wheel lock jaw jost sk240514 20.10028 fifth wheel lock jaw jost sk240514z 20.10003 fifth wheel lock ring .

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.