C National Library Of Sri Lanka-Cataloguing-In-Publication .

2y ago
57 Views
2 Downloads
3.34 MB
218 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Genevieve Webb
Transcription

Copyright C October 2002Institute of Policy Studies, Sri LankaNational Library of Sri Lanka-Cataloguing-In-Publication DataShand, RicIrrigation and Agriculture in Sri Lanka/ Ric Shand.Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies, 2002.- 210p. ; 25 c.m.ISBN 955-8708-11-9Price:i. 631.5875493 DDC 21ii. Title1.Agriculture – Sri Lanka2.Irrigation – Sri LankaISBN 955-8708-11-9PricePlease address orders to:Institute of Policy Studies99 St Michael’s Road, Colombo 3, Sri LankaTel: 94 1 431 368, 431 378 Fax: 94 1 431 395Email: ips@sri.lanka.netThe views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of theInstitute of Policy Studies.

Irrigation and AgricultureinSri LankabyRic ShandThis study was first commissioned under the Public Sector Restructuring Project in Sri Lanka forthe World Bank and the Ministry of Finance and Planning, Government of Sri Lanka, Colombo, 1

List of TablesivList of DiagramsviList of MapsviList of FiguresviSpecial Terms, Acronyms and Ric ShandHistorical BackgroundRic Shand14Irrigation in Public Sector Investment Programmes 1950 to 2000S. Somasunderam and Y.M.W.B. Weerasekera12Benefits and Costs of Past Irrigation InvestmentRic Shand and S.A.B. Ekanayake37Options for Future Investment in IrrigationN. Wickremaratne and Ric Shand61Operation and Maintenance Requirements of Irrigation SystemsN. Wickremaratne and S.A.B. Ekanayake107Benefits and Costs of Rice Based Agricultural DevelopmentS.A.B. Ekanayake116Diversification and the Development of Commercial AgricultureU. Pethiyagoda and Ric Shand139Developments in Irrigation and Agriculture in the 1990sRic Shand168Annex 1185References187i

ForewordSri Lanka has always been predominantly an agricultural economy since ancient times and thehistory of irrigation facilities dates back to over two millennia. Small village tanks with singlechannel systems developed into an advanced irrigation technology such as the device called thevalve pit (Biso Kotuwa) and a large number of irrigation systems helped make Sri Lanka inancient times the “the Granary of the East”.At the time of regaining independence the predominantly agricultural sector consisted of anexport agricultural sector and a subsistence agricultural sector. Governments after independenceattempted to develop the domestic agricultural sector through the development of agriculturalinfrastructure to improve irrigation facilities, apart from institutions for the delivery of credit,inputs and extension services. The major focus of agricultural policy was to achieve selfsufficiency in food, mainly rice and investments were made in the restoration and rehabilitationof existing irrigation schemes and the construction of new schemes. It was also to help inrelieving the growing pressure of the population working on land in the existing dry zone areas.About 75 per cent of the population still live in the rural sector and agriculture, particularly ricefarming is, in Sri Lanka not merely a livelihood but is considered a way of life. In order todevelop this sector it becomes necessary, as there is a seasonal variation in rainfall, to provideirrigation facilities to cultivate land in two seasons at least.The Gal Oya Scheme was the first large multipurpose project to be undertaken followed since1955 by a number of other irrigation schemes culminating in the largest ever multipurposeirrigation project undertaken by the State since independence in the Mahaweli DevelopmentProgramme.The present volume is timely and deals in depth with some important issues and problemsassociated with these irrigation schemes and agriculture. It has been written by a number ofeminent specialists in their respective fields and ably correlated and edited by Ric Shand who hascontributed considerably to the text himself. The study was originally completed in 1990 andhas since been revised and updated to the year 2000. Of special interest is the examination ofsuch issues as the costs and returns of irrigation schemes , the options for investment inirrigation, the adoption of new designs and technologies, the benefits and costs of rice baseddevelopment with particular reference to productivity levels, and theprospects fordiversification and development of commercial agriculture.The arguments are supported by a wealth of statistical data and illustrated by some veryinteresting maps and diagrams. There is no doubt that the information and discussions providedin the book would be of interest and use to policy planners, administrators, experts in irrigationand agriculture as well as to the general public alike.Gamani CoreaChairman, IPSAugust 2002ii

AcknowledgementsThe editor and contributors wish to express their warm thanks to the Institute of Policy Studiesand to its Executive Director, Dr. Saman Kelegama for their generous offer to publish an updatedversion of the 1990 study.As team leader of the original study and as editor of this volume, I would like to express my deepappreciation for the contributions made by the highly talented specialist members of the team.Their team spirit and cooperation made the study an enjoyable experience at a difficult time forSri Lanka. The team was ably and sympathetically coordinated by Mr. Merrick Perera.We extend our warm thanks for the invaluable cooperation of the Cartography Unit in theResearch School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University and in particular toKay Dancey in the Unit who expertly and patiently prepared all the Maps, Diagrams and Figures.We also thank Christine Gomesz of the IPS who has guided this manuscript through the finalstages of its preparation for publication.Ric ShandEditorAugust 2002iii

List of TablesTable 2.1Classification of Irrigation Works by Type, Size and Features10Table 3.1Investment in Irrigation 1950-198715Table 3.2Investments in Irrigation as Percentages of PIP15Table 3.3Sectoral Allocation in Public Investment Programmes from1979-83 to 1996-200017Table 3.4Mahaweli Allocations in the Public Investment Programme 1980-200021Table 3.5Ongoing and New Investments and Annual Expenditures in theMahaweli, 1979 to 200024Table 3.6Investment in Non-Mahaweli Irrigation Schemes, 1986-199927Table 3.7Breakdown of Expenditures on the Inginimitiya Project29Table 3.8Estimated Costs of the Kirindi Oya Project30Table 3.9Some Performance Indicators of Major and Medium Schemes31Table 3.10Breakdon of Expenditures on the Village Irrigation Rehabilitation Project32Table 3.11Estimated Actual Costs of the Tank Irrigation Modernisation Project33Table 3.12The Gal Oya Left Bank Management Project34Table 3.13Other Performance Indicators of the Gal Oya Left Bank 41Management Project34Table 4.1Indicators of Costs and Benefits for Mahaweli and Rehabilitation Schemes38Table 4.2Cost and Benefit Parameters for Six World Bank-Supported Projects41Table 4.3Appraisal and Project Completion Projections of Cropping Intensitiesand Paddy Yields for the TIMP46Table 4.4Sensitivity Tests on the Projected EIRR of the VIRP49Table 4.5Distribution of the Benefit Cost Ratios within the VIRP52Table 4.6Projected Economic Returns from the Major IrrigationRehabilitation Project (MIRP)53Total Areas under Other Proposed River Basin Development SystemProposals within the North Central Province67Reported Differences brought about by the New Technology atWalagambahuwa80Table 5.3Cropping Patterns Followed by Farmers80Table 6.1Holding Size and Cropping Intensity in Major Schemes110Table 6.2Profitability of Irrigated Paddy111Table 6.3Incidence of Paddy Parcels with Water Problems by Size of Parcel,Maha Season 1986/87113Incidence of Paddy with Water Problems, Yala 1987 or Most RecentlyCultivated Yala113Table 5.1Table 5.2Table 6.4iv

Table 6.5Percentage Distribution of Paddy Parcels with Water Problemsby Type, Maha 1986/87113Percentage Distribution of Paddy Parcels with Water Problemsby Type, most recent Yala114Table 7.1A Comparison of Estimates of Rice Production126Table 7.2Projected Paddy Yields127Table 7.3Average Paddy Yields in System H128Table 7.4Projections of Population, Demand and Supply of Rice, 1991 to 2016130Table 7.5Total Rice Production at Varying Levels of Yield Increase per annumwith Area Expansion as Planned in 1992131Total Rice Production at Varying Levels of Yield Increase per annumwith Area Expansion Planned in 1992, Including System B (RB)and Moragahakanda131Table 7.7Supply of Nutrients and the Sources137Table 7.8Availability, Requirement and the Per Capita Per Day Shortfall ofLocally Produced Food Items138Table 8.1Area Planned by Crops, Uda Walawe Project140Table 8.2Area Cultivated in Uda Walawe Project by Crops, Year and Season,1969/70 to 1979Quantities, Yield and Area Required by Some Traditional Dry ZoneCrops in 1987Table 6.6Table 7.6Table 8.3Table 8.4141148Costs and Returns for Paddy and Some Other Crops UnderIrrigation at Polonnaruwa148Yields and Returns from Crops Grown at Kalawewa, System Hin Yala Season149Table 8.6Areas of Crops Grown in System H in Yala Season, 1977 to 1984150Table 8.7Crop Requirements Based on Nutritional Needs in 1986150Table 8.8Economic Performance of Crops in Yala Season in Well Irrigated Areas153Table 8.9Areas of Gravity Command within the AMDP by Type of Drainage154Table 8.10Crops Identified as having Potential for Mahaweli Areas156Table 9.1Growth Rates and Structure of Real Output, 1986 to 1997168Table 9.2Sri Lanka Trade Policy Protection – Agricultural Crops Relative toManufacturing Industry175Table 8.5v

List of DiagramsPageDiagram 5.1Present and Potential Additional Areas Under theMahaweli Irrigation System63The Mahaweli Development Project and Special AreasAccelerated Mahaweli AreaAccelerated Mahaweli Development Programme61113List of MapsMap 2.1Map 2.2Map 3.1List of FiguresFigure 5.1Figure 5.2Figure 5.3Figure 5.4Figure 5.5Figure 5.6Figure 5.7Figure 5.8Figure 5.9Figure 5.10Figure 5.11Figure 7.1viVillage Tank SystemsSolar Radiation and Rice Grain YieldProfile of a Typical Dry Zone LandscapeMuthukandiya Model – Farm LevelMuthukandiya Model – Village LevelWeli Oya ModelA Two-Tank Version of the Weli Oya ModelTypes of AquifersAreas under Ground Water InvestigationsVanathavillu BasinMurunkan BasinTrends in Paddy Prices and Cost of Production7882848586899092949597120

Special Terms, Acronyms and AbbreviationsADBAsian Development BankACAlternative cropsAMDPAccelerated Mahaweli Development ProgrammeANUGABiennial food fair held in Cologne, Federal Republic of GermanyBDSBaffle Distribution SystemBGsBathalagoda rice varietiesCEMCountry Economic MemorandumCICropping intensityDRCDomestic Resource CostEBCREconomic benefit cost ratiosEDSEnterprise development strategyEIEDEmployment Investment Enterprise StrategyEIRREconomic internal rate of returnEMSExport marketing strategyEPCEffective Protection CoefficientERREconomic rate of returnESCEffective Subsidy CoefficientFCCField canalsGDPGross Domestic ProductGODBGal Oya Development BoardGOSLGovernment of Sri LankaGPSGuaranteed Price SchemeIDAInternational Development AgencyIPSInstitute of Policy StudiesISMPIrrigation Systems Management ProjectLBLeft BankLDDLand Development Departmentvii

LMCALower Mahaweli Catchment AreaLHGLow humic gley (soil)MARDMinistry of Agricultural Development and ResearchMASLMahaweli Authority of Sri LankaMEAMahaweli Economic AgencyMECAMahaweli Engineering and Construction AgencyMIRPMajor Irrigation Rehabilitation ProjectMOARDMinistry of Agricultural Development and ResearchNPCNominal Protection CoefficientOECDOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentOEDOperations Evaluation Department (World Bank)OFCOther food cropsO&MOperations and MaintenancePARPoverty Assessment ReportPCRProject Completion ReportPIPPublic Investment ProgrammePMUPlanning and Monitoring UnitPPARProject Performance Audit ReportRBRight BankRBEReddish brown earthsRVDBRiver Valley Development BoardSEDZSouth East Dry ZoneSRDSR Daines ReportTECTotal estimated costTIMPTank Irrigation Rehabilitation ProjectTORTerms of ReferenceUKODMUnited Kingdom Overseas Development Ministryviii

UMCAUpper Mahaweli Catchment AreaUMPDUpper Mahaweli Peripheral DevelopmentUSAIDUnites States Agency for International DevelopmentVIRPVillage Irrigation Rehabilitation Projectix

Contributors1990 Irrigation Sub-Sector Study TeamMerrick PereraCoordinatorPublic Sector Restructuring ProjectMinistry of Finance and PlanningRic ShandTeam LeaderUniversity of Colombo and The Australian National UniversityS. A. B. EkanayakeSenior EconomistPlanning and Monitoring UnitMahaweli Authority of Sri LankaU. PethiyagodaEmployment Investment Enterprise DevelopmentMahaweli Authority of Sri LankaN. L. SirisenaDeputy DirectorStatistics DivisionCentral Bank of Sri LankaS. SomasunderamDeputy DirectorNational Planning DivisionMinistry of Finance and PlanningY. M. W. B. WeerasekeraSenior EconomistDepartment of Economic ResearchCentral Bank of Sri LankaK. N. WickramaratneAssistant DirectorMahaweli Engineering and Construction AgencyMahaweli Authority of Sri Lankax

1. IntroductionSince Independence, investment in irrigation has received high priority in the PublicInvestment Programme (PIP) in Sri Lanka. The proportion of public investment allocatedfor irrigation varied from 9 per cent to 40 per cent in the 1950-87 period. Beingtraditionally a predominantly agricultural economy, it is not surprising that such largeallocations were made for investment in irrigation. Irrigation is an input that helps not onlyin the expansion of area under agriculture, but can also facilitate technological change andtherefore help to increase productivity. Also, agro-climatically, Sri Lanka has an unusuallyfavourable environment for exploitation of rainfall and cultivable land through irrigation1.One major concern associated with past expenditures on irrigation in the PIP was that thehigh priority given to this sub-sector may have resulted in shortages of essential investmentfunds for other sub-sectors within agriculture. For example, the tree crop sector (tea, rubberand coconut), which accounts for a higher value added than the paddy sector in GDP, mayhave suffered. Relatedly, sectors other than agriculture in the economy may also have beenadversely affected. Thus, essential developments in those areas may have been undulypostponed. It has been suggested that sectors such as industry and transport earn greaterreturns relative to irrigation and agriculture and therefore should be given preference in theallocation of scarce investment funds within the economy.A 1988 study for the World Bank found that, in spite of substantial subsidies given forirrigation, fertilizer and credit, the overall effects of economy-wide policies discriminatedagainst the rice sector, although to a lesser extent, relative to tree crops (Krueger et al.1988). In this context, greater attention in allocation of Public Investment Funds to theagricultural sector relative to other sectors may have been justified. But, given thatinvestments in irrigation were concentrated in particular areas, e.g. the AcceleratedMahaweli Development Programme (ADMP), the effect of the implicit tax on rice willhave varied substantially within the rice sector. Thus, rice growers outside the AMDP arelikely to have been at a greater disadvantage than those within the AMDP. This may haveimportant socio-economic and even political implications.The above issues relate to inter-sectoral allocations within the agricultural sector. Anotherimportant issue, which needs attention, is related to the allocation of public investment1Sri Lanka has two monsoons, a rainfall distribution and drainage pattern that permit large proportions ofrainfall to be harnessed for irrigation purposes.1

within the irrigation sub-sector. In brief, the major issue relates to the overwhelming shareof the PIP given to the Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme (AMDP) in thepost-1980 period. For example, by the end of 1988, a total of Rs. 46,546 million has beenspent on the AMDP. Nearly 60 per cent of this was spent on major head works.2What worried most critics was the impact of the acceleration. Fears were expressed in somequarters that spending such a large amount of the country’s resources on the AMDP wouldpose a threat to the country’s macroeconomic stability. Nevertheless, the AMDP wentahead because of the perceived necessity to secure the expected benefits of the programme,which were to reduce unemployment by creating short and long term employmentopportunities; to increase agricultural production, particularly rice to achieve food selfsufficiency, and to alleviate power shortages. The World Bank (1987) agreed to the AMDPfor the above reasons despite the lack of knowledge and studies. There were also politicalconsiderations. The decision to accelerate the Mahaweli Programme involved a trade-off.Political and economic benefits were to compensate for the economic and political costs ofthe economic and reform measures of the 1978 government, e.g., devaluation and reducingsubsidies. Also, many donors were prepared to fund large capital projects.Whether the potential economic benefits of such a programme justify the enormous capitalcosts needs to be established. The AMDP is already near its end, and the major issue is notwhether it was justified, rather it is whether similar programmes should continue to formthe basis of national irrigation policy.This study was originally completed in 1990. It has since been revisited and updated toYear 2000, so this particular question can be tested against the Public InvestmentProgramme through the 1990s.In the chapters that follow, a brief historical background on irrigation in Sri Lanka is givenin Chapter 2. Chapter 3 tracks investment in irrigation from 1950 to Year 2000, with2This was not a new phenomenon. The Short Term Implementation Program of the Department of NationalPlanning (1962 p.119) drew attention to the fact that irrigation and land development continued to absorb agreater part of investment in the agricultural sector and stated that:“despite this considerable investment, the output of this sector has not been such as to make anysignificant impact on our food problem. It is time, therefore, to critically examine returns inrelation to investment made and to adopt a more realistic approach to development. This is allthe more necessary at a time of scarce capital and foreign exchange resources. Continuedinvestment in a traditional field quite unrelated to output can only be undertaken at the cost offunds to other more productive activities.”2

particular emphasis on the period from 1979 to 2000 in the PIP. In consideration ofinvestment in irrigation, a key factor to be considered is the comparison of costs andreturns of the alternatives. Chapter 4 reviews costs and returns of past irrigation schemesfor which adequate data could be obtained, ranging from the largest river basindevelopment schemes such as the Accelerated Mahaweli Development Programme(AMDP) to the smallest minor irrigation projects.Chapter 5 examines options for investment in irrigation, including new projects within andoutside the AMDP, rehabilitation and modernisation of existing projects, minor projectsand ground water-based irrigation systems. It considers the need for adoption of newdesign concepts and new technologies in major irrigation schemes, and makesrecommendations amongst these options.Chapter 6 comprises two parts. The first reviews O&M requirements and the past record offee collection in Sri Lanka under traditional systems of rice based irrigated agriculture. Thesecond is concerned with O&M under modernised irrigation systems and more diversifiedirrigated agriculture.The history of irrigated agriculture in Sri Lanka has essentially been one of rice baseddevelopment with particular priority to self-sufficiency in rice. Chapter 7 examines thebenefits and costs

National Library of Sri Lanka-Cataloguing-In-Publication Data Shand, Ric Irrigation and Agriculture in Sri Lanka/ Ric Shand.- Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies, 2002.- 210p. ; 25 c.m. ISBN 955-8708-11-9 Price: i. 631.5875493

Related Documents:

SRI 59 26. Fashion Gray UC51825 SRI 33 21. Brick Red UC43355 SRI 31 02. Graham White UC72638 SRI 95 17. Medium Bronze UC109862 SRI 10 07. Malt UC105738 SRI 74 12. Beige UC54137 SRI 61 27. Eclipse Gray UC106669 SRI 8 22. River Rouge Red UC52006 SRI 19 03. Bone White UC109880 SRI 84 18. Bronze UC110460 SRI 2 0

Sri Rama Raksha Stotram Om asya Sri rAmarakShA stotra mahA mantrasya budhakaushika RiShiH srI sItA rAmachandro devatA anuShTup ChandaH sItA shaktiH srImAn hanumAn kIlakam srI rAmachandra prItyarthe Sri rAmarakShA stotra jape viniyogaH Sri Rama protection prayer The sage is Budha Kousika, God is Sri Sita Ramachandra,

Moolamnaya Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetam Sri Kanchi Mahaswamigal and Sri Vidyaranya Swamigal by Pujya Sri Atmabodha Tirtha Swamigal (Sri Kumbakonam Swamigal) . Bhagavadgita and Brahmasutram) of Sri Adi Sankara Bhagavadpada from 10.03.1999 to 13.03.2004 (Anusham, Sri Mahaswamigal Nakshatram day) as directed by Sri Kanchi Acharyas. The present Sri .

to Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi by Sri M. Sivaprakasam Pillai, about the year 1902. Sri Pillai, a graduate in philosophy, was at the time employed in the Revenue Department of the South Arcot Collectorate. During his visit to Tiruvannamalai in 1902 on official work, he went to Virupaksha Cave on Arunachala Hill and met the MaharshiFile Size: 539KBPage Count: 40Explore furtherWho Am I? (Nan Yar?) - Sri Ramana Maharshiwww.sriramanamaharshi.orgBe as you are – The teachings of sri Ramana Maharishiwww.sadgurus-saints-sages.comA Light on the Teaching of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshiwww.happinessofbeing.comTeachings of Ramana Maharshi in His Own Words SINGLE PAGEwww.coursnondualite.com(pdf) The Collected Works Of Sri Ramana Maharshi .isitreallyflat.comRecommended to you b

Sri Hanuman Chalisa: 50 Sri Lingashtakam: 54 Sri Bilvaashtakam: 56 Sri Shivashtakam: 58 Sri Annapurna Stotram: 59 Sri Durga Dwatrinsha Naamamala: 61 Sri Lalita Sahasra Nama Stotram: 62 Sri Devi

Rockwall Coating Rockwall Stone - Coated IPS Panel Color And Finish Guide www.insulated-panels.com 6-11/10M ENERGY STAR Qualified Color SNOW WHITE SR .65 SRI 79 MEDIUM BRONZE SR .33 SRI 36 ALMOND SR .63 SRI 76 TUNDRA BROWNSTONE SR .46 SRI 53 SR .47 SRI 54 HARBOR BLUE SR .28 SRI 30 SLATE GRAY SR .37 SRI 41 PACIFIC BLUE SR .29 SRI 31

Venkateswara Vrata Kalpam, Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Vrata Kalpam, Sri Ananda Anjaneyam, Sri Maheswara Vratam, Sri Subramanya Vratam, Sri Sai Raksha Vratam, Sri Rama Raksha Vratam are more popularly followed. All th

Sri Narasimha Karanamruthamu Sri Nayam Arankamula Sanghika Natakamu Sri Neelakanta Bhashyamu-Vol Ii SRI NEELAKANTIYA SHARIRAKA BRAHMAMIMANSA SUTRA BHASHYAMU . SRI SATYANARAYANA VRATA KALPAMU Sri Satyanarayana Vratha Mahatyamu Sri Satyasatyapurshtwa