Design Of A Low-Cost, Underwater Acoustic Modem For

2y ago
22 Views
3 Downloads
1.39 MB
9 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Halle Mcleod
Transcription

Design of a Low-Cost, Underwater Acoustic Modemfor Short-Range Sensor NetworksB. Benson, Y. Li, R. KastnerB.Faunce, K. Domond, D. Kimball, C. SchurgersDepartment of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA 92093California Institute for Telecommunications andInformation Technology, UCSDLa Jolla, CA 92093Abstract- A fundamental impediment to the use of denseunderwater sensor networks is an inexpensive acoustic modem.Commercial underwater modems that do exist were designed forsparse, long range, applications rather than for small, dense,sensor nets.Thus, we are building an underwater acousticmodem starting with the most critical component from a costperspective – the transducer.The design substitutes acommercial transducer with a homemade transducer using cheappiezo-ceramic material and builds the rest of the modem ’scomponents around the properties of the transducer to extract asmuch performance as possible. This paper presents the designconsiderations, implementation details, and initial experimentalresults of our modem.I.INTRODUCTIONOur fundamental knowledge of aquatic ecosystems isincreasing at a tremendous rate due to the physical, chemicaland biological time-series data from long term sensors. As aresult, research sites around the world are being equipped witha broad range of sensors and instruments. Despite thesubstantial effort to monitor ecological aspects of aquaticsystems, the infrastructure needed for sensor networks inmarine and freshwater systems without question lags farbehind that available for terrestrial counterparts.There is increasing interest in the design and deployment ofunderwater acoustic communication networks. For example,the Persistent Littoral Undersea Surveillance Network(PLUSNet) demonstrates multi-sensor and multi-vehicle antisubmarine warfare (ASW) by means of an underwateracoustic communications network [1]. A short range shallowwater network to monitor pollution indicators in Newport Bay,CA is proposed in [2]. A network of acoustic modems akin tomotes is proposed for low power, short range acousticcommunications for seismic monitoring [3]. A swarm ofacoustically networked autonomous drifters is envisioned tomonitor phenomena as they are subjected to ocean currents [4].A 1km x 1km underwater wireless network of 10s oftemperature sensors is envisioned to obtain high temporal andspatial resolution observations within the coral reef lagoon atthe Moorea Coral Reef Long Term Ecological ResearchStation [5].In order to make more short-range underwater acousticcommunication networks a reality, the cost of underwateracoustic modems must come down. Commercial off-the-shelf(COTS) underwater acoustic modems are not suitable forshort-range ( 100m) underwater sensor-nets: their powerdraws, ranges, and price points are all designed for sparse,long-range, expensive systems rather than small, dense, andcheap sensor-nets [6]. It is widely recognized that an openarchitecture, low cost underwater acoustic modem is needed totruly enable advanced underwater ecological analyses.Underwater acoustic modems consist of three maincomponents (Figure 1): (1) an underwater transducer, (2) ananalog transceiver (matching pre-amp and amplifier), and (3)a digital platform for control and signal processing. Asubstantial portion of the cost of the modem is the underwatertransducer; commercially available underwater omnidirectional transducers (such as those as seen in existingresearch modem designs [7-9]) cost on the order of 2K- 3K.Commercial transducers are expensive, due to the cost ofensuring consistent quality control of manufacturingpiezoelectric materials and potting compounds, expensivecalibration equipment and time-consuming characterization,all further exacerbated by low volume production. Therefore,much of the design for the low-cost modem lies in finding anappropriate substitute for the custom commercial transducer.Jurdak et al. substituted the transducer with generic,inexpensive, speakers and microphones, but were only able toobtain a data rate of 42 bps for a transmission range of 17m[10]. Benson et. al substituted a custom transducer with acommercially available fish finder transducer (which cost 50),but was only able to obtain a data rate of 80 bps for atransmission range of 6m [11]. Furthermore, these fish findershave a 5 degree beam width, making them less than ideal formost deployment scenarios.Figure 1. Major components of an underwater acoustic modemIn this paper, we present the design of a short-rangeunderwater acoustic modem starting with the most criticalcomponent from a cost perspective – the transducer. Thedesign substitutes a commercial underwater transducer with ahomemade underwater transducer using cheap piezoceramic

material and builds the rest of the modem ’s componentsaround the properties of the transducer to extract as muchperformance as possible.We describe the ialexperimental results of our modem prototype.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section II describes the design of our homemade transducerand its experimentally determined electrical and mechanicalproperties. Section III describes the design of our analogtransceiver and Section IV describes the design transceiver.We present experimental results in Section V and compare thepower and cost of our modem to existing modem designs inSection VI. We conclude with a discussion on future work inSection VII.II. TRANSDUCERIn this section we describe the design of our homemadetransducer, explaining the reasons behind the selection of itspiezo-ceramic, urethane compound, and wire leads. We thenpresent the transducer ’s experimentally determined electricaland mechanical properties which are used to govern the rest ofthe modem design.A. Transducer DesignUnderwater transducers are typically made frompiezoelectric materials – materials (notably crystals such aslead zirconate titanate and certain ceramics) that generate anelectric potential in response to applied mechanic stress andproduce a stress or strain when an electric field is applied. Forunderwater communication, transducers are usually omnidirectional in the horizontal plane to reduce reflection off thesurface and bottom. This is especially important for shallowwater communications.The 2D omni-directional beam pattern can be achievedusing a radially expanding ring or using a ring made of severalceramics cemented together. A radially expanding ceramicring provides 2D omni-directionality in the planeperpendicular to the axis and near omni-directionality inplanes through the axis if the height of the ring is smallcompared to the wavelength of sound being sent through themedium [12]. The radially expanding ceramic is relativelyinexpensive to manufacture. A ring made of several ceramicscemented together provides greater electromechanicalcoupling, power output, and electrical efficiency; thepiezoelectric constant and coupling coefficient areapproximately double that of a one-piece ceramic ring [Ken1].They work better because the polarization can be placed in thedirection of primary stresses and strains along thecircumference. However, these are much more difficult tomanufacture and are therefore much more expensive than aone piece radial expanding piezoelectric ceramic ring. Wethus selected to use a single radially expanding ring, a 10Steminc model SMC26D22H13SMQA to achieve an omnidirectional beam pattern at low-cost.The most common method of making transducers from aring ceramic is to add two leads, and pot it for waterproofing[12]. We used shielded cables for the transducer leads toensure the leads would not pick up unwanted electromagneticnoise and attached the leads using solder with 3% silver.The piezoelectric ceramic needs to be encapsulated in apotting compound to prevent contact with any conductivefluids. Urethanes are the most common material used forpotting because of their versatility. The most important designconsideration is to find a urethane that is acousticallytransparent in the medium that the transducer will be used; thisis more important for higher frequency or more sensitiveapplications where the wavelength and amplitude is smallerthan the thickness of the potting material. Generally, similardensity provides similar acoustical properties. Mineral oil isanother good way to pot the ceramics because it is inert andhas similar acoustical properties as water. Some prefer usingmineral oil to urethane because it is not permanent. However,the oil still needs to be contained by something, which is oftena urethane tube. We selected a two-part urethane pottingcompound, EN12, manufactured by Cytec Industries [13] as ithas a density identical to that of water, providing for efficientmechanical to acoustical energy coupling.Creating a transducer by potting the ceramic shifts itsresonance frequency due to the additional mass movingimmediately around the transducer. The extent of the shiftdepends on the potting compound ’s characteristics.Characteristics can vary depending on the type, age,temperature, and mixing method of the compound. Theamount of potting can influence resonance frequency as well.Having tight control over these variables to ensure exactreproducibility requires expensive equipment. To keep costslow, we used a simplistic potting method, pouring and mixingthe compound by hand in a thermostat controlled lab.Experimental results described in the next subsection indicatethat the transducer variations caused in our simplistic pottingprocedure are suitable for our intended application.Figure 2 shows the piezo-ceramic ring, the potted ceramic,and the transducer in the potting compound mounted to aprototype plate to be attached to the modem housing. The totalcost of our transducer, including the ceramic, leads, pottingand labor is approximately 50.Figure 2. From left to right: The raw piezoelectric ring ceramic, the pottedceramic, the transducer in the potting compound mounted to a prototype plateto be attached to a modem housing.B. Transducer PropertiesFor a single radially expanding ceramic ring, the resonancefrequency occurs when the circumference approximatelyequals the operating wavelength [12, 14]. In air, this frequencyis about 41 kHz for every inch in diameter of a solid radiallyexpanding ceramic ring; for the ring made of several ceramicscemented together, in the case that there is not inactivematerial (such as electrodes or cement), the resonance

frequency is approx 37 kHz for every innch [12]. TheSMC26D22H13SMQA has an outer diameterr of 1.024 inches,a wall thickness of 0.1 inches and a height of 00.512 inches.Steminc specifies that the ceramic ring has a nominalresonance frequency of 43kHz /- 1.5kHz. Experimentallymeasuring the impedance of two different cerramics (Figure 3)shows the ceramics do fall within this speecification. Theresonance frequency ( 43kHz) and anti-resoonance frequency( 45kHz) occur at minimum and maximuum impedances,respectively [14, 15].dthe transducer ’sThe experimental procedure to determineTVR and RVR included placing our transducer in water 1meter apart from a reference transsducer with a known TVRand RVR (in our case, an ITC10422 [16]) in the middle of a 3meter deep, 2 meter wide cylindriccal test tank, and collectingsignals swept across frequenciees, 31k-90kHz in 1kHzincrements, sent from the reference transducer to ourtransducer and vice versa. We theen calculated the RVR andTVR of our transducer based on the collected data and thereference ’s TVR and RVR. Figurres 5 and 6 show the TVRand RVR of transducer T1.T1 TVVR144dB re 1uPa/V @1m142138136134132Figure 3. The SMC26D22H13SMQA cerammic impedance (andresonance frequency) in air of two ceramics (T1, T2)13030405060708090Frequencyy [kHz]Figure 5. Experimentally determined trransmitting voltage response fortransducer T1TT1 RVR-190-195dB re 1V/1uPaAs stated in the previous subsection, potttting the ceramicshifts the resonance frequency due to the additional massmoving immediately around the transducer. Figure 4 showsthe extent of this shift and the relatively small variation(caused by the ceramic ’s variation and the pootting procedure)between two different transducers (potted ussing the ceramicsT1 and T2 from Figure 3). Transmittting around thetransducer ’s resonance frequency (35kHz) prrovides the mostefficient electrical to acoustical energy couplinng encyy [kHz]Figure 6. Experimentally determined reeceiving voltage response fortransducer T1TFigure 4. The transducer impedance and resonance frrequency ( 35kHz) oftransducers potted from ceramics T1 and T2To characterize the transducer ’s eleectro-mechanicalproperties, we experimentally measured its transmittingvoltage response (TVR) and its receiving vvoltage response(RVR). The TVR is defined as the sounnd pressure levelexperienced at 1m range, generated by the traansducer per 1 Vof input Voltage and is a function of frequenccy. The RVR is ameasure of the voltage generated by a planne wave of unitacoustic pressure at the receiver and is a functtion of frequency.The max response of the TVR annd RVR do not necessarilyoccur at the transducer ’s electriccal resonance (as seen inFigures 5 and 6), but the transducer ’s resonance frequency stillfalls near the peak. The sharp peakks and valleys of TVR andRVR can be attributed to inefficciencies in the calibrationprocedure and characteristics of resonancerthat are directlyrelated to geometry of the PZT. Too obtain a flatter, smootherTVR and RVR (such as those forf [16]), more expensiveceramics and manufacturing and calibration procedures arerequired.

In addition to the TVR and RVR, an important parameter ofa transducer is how much voltage it can tolerate before itbreaks A typical Type I PZT ’s can experience up to 12 voltsAC per .001 inches wall thickness without much effect to itselectro-mechanical properties[17]. Thus, voltages up to1200Vpp or 425Vrms should be used for our transducer.Using the passive sonar equation we can calculate theexpected max distance the transducer will be able to send asignal given a Source Level (SL), the transmission loss (TL,due to spreading and absorption loss in the water), and thenoise level (NL) of the ocean.SNR SL – TL - NL(1)Figure 7 shows the expected max distance achievable forthe transducer transmitting at the transducer ’s resonancefrequency at various voltages assuming a noise level of 50 dBr 1 uPa. Transmitting 425 Vrms, for an SNR of 10 dB re 1uPa at the receiver, the transducer could theoretically send asignal up to 2800 meters. The receive voltage at 10 dB SNR(determined using the RVR) is 820uV.SNR vs. Range12025 Vrms125 Vrms225 Vrms325 Vrms425 Vrms100SNR806040200-2005001000per unit depending on the quantity produced. The transmitterand receiver portions of the analog transceiver are described inmore detail in the following subsections.150020002500Figure 8. Analog TransceiverC. Analog TransmitterThe transmitter was designed to operate for signal inputsin a range of 0 – 100kHz. The architecture is uniqueandconsists of two different amplifiers working in tandem(Figure 9). The primary amplifier is a highly linear Class ABamplifier that provides a voltage gain of 23 while achieving apower efficiency of about 50%. The output of the Class ABamplifier is connected to current sense circuitry that in turncontrols the secondary amplifier, which is a Class D switchingamplifier. The Class D amplifier is inherently nonlinear butpossesses an efficiency of approximately 95%. With both ofthe amplifiers driving the load and working together, thetransmitter achieves a highly linear output signal whilemaintaining a power efficiency greater than 75%. Due to itshigh linearity, the transmitter may be used with anymodulation technique that can be programmed into the digitalhardware platform.3000Distance (m)Figure 7. SNR vs. range for various transmit voltages based on transducerT1 ’s TVR. The graph assumes transmission at 35kHz and an ocean noiselevel of 50 dB re 1uPa.The transducer ’s experimentally determined electrical andmechanical properties govern the design choices for the rest ofthe modem design. The following section describes theanalog transceiver.III. ANALOG TRANSCEIVERThe analog transceiver (Figure 8) consists of a high powertransmitter and a highly sensitive receiver both of which areoptimized to operate in the transducer ’s resonance frequencyrange (Figure 4). The transmitter is responsible for amplifyingthe modulated signal from the digital hardware platform andsending it to the transducer so that it may be transmittedthrough the water. The receiver amplifies the signal that isdetected by the transducer so that the digital hardwareplatform can effectively demodulate the signal and analyze thetransmitted data. The transceiver costs between 125 and 225Figure 9. Analog transmitter block diagram. The transmitter uses twoamplifiers two achieve efficiencyA power management circuit is provided to adjust theoutput power in real-time to match it to the actual distancebetween transmitter and receiver. The ability to provide alow-power output has several important benefits: (1) lessinterference for nearby ongoing communications; (2) reducednoise pollution and (3) considerable power savings. Thecurrent configuration of the transmitter is equipped with apower management system that can switch between outputlevels of 2, 12, 24 and 40 watts. The power managementsystem has been designed so that the transmitter will maintainmaximum efficiency over this wide range of power output

levels. The system is controlled by a low currrent 5 volt signalfrom the digital hardware platform so that thhe power may bedynamically controlled for different operatingg conditions.D. Analog ReceiverFigure 10. Analog receiver block diagram. The receivers provides high gain ina narrow band around the transducer ’s resoonanceThe receiver ’s architecture consists of a sett of narrow (highQ) filters with high gain (Figure 10). These filters are basedon biquad band-pass filters, and essentially coombine the tasksof filtering and amplification. The receiver is configured soHz (to match thethat it only amplifies signals around 35 kHelectrical resonance frequency of the traansducer) whileattenuating low frequencies at a rate of 120dBB per decade andhigh frequencies at rate of 80dB per decade (Figure 11). Thereceiver must be able to amplify only thee frequencies ofinterest because of the large amount of noisee associated withunderwater acoustic signals. The cuurrent receiverconfiguration consumes about 375 mW when in standby modeand less than 750 mW when fully engaged. The relativelyhigh power consumption (in comparison to thhat of the WHOIMicromodem (200mW)) [7] is a result of thee receiver ’s highgain (65dB) which is capable of sufficientlly amplifying aninput signal as small as a few hundred microvvolts allowing thereceiver to pick up signals at longer distancces (such as the820uV received signal described in section II). An ultra-lowpower wake up circuit will be added to the receiver toconsiderably reduce power consumption. A few receivercomponent values can be changed to widen itts bandwidth (butdecrease its gain) to allow for transmissionn of modulationschemes that require more bandwidth.ding, but not limited to, theunderwater acoustic modem includchoice of modulation scheme and hardware platform for itsimplementation. We selected to implement frequency shiftkeying, (FSK) on a field programmmable gate array (FPGA) forour modem prototype.FSK is a fairly simple modulattion scheme that has beenwidely used in underwater communnications over the past twodecades due to its resistance to timme and frequency spreadingof the underwater acoustic channell [7,18]. Other modulationschemes such as phase shift keying [7], direct sequence spreadspectrum (DSSS) [8] and orthoogonal division frequencymultiplexing (OFDM) [19, 20] aree

analog transceiver (matching pre-amp and amplifier), and (3) a digital platform for control and signal processing. A substantial portion of the cost of the modem is the underwater transducer; commercially available underwater omni-d

Related Documents:

EA 4-1 CHAPTER 4 JOB COSTING 4-1 Define cost pool, cost tracing, cost allocation, and cost-allocation base. Cost pool––a grouping of individual indirect cost items. Cost tracing––the assigning of direct costs to the chosen cost object. Cost allocation––the assigning of indirect costs to the chosen cost object. Cost-alloca

Cost Accounting 1.2 Objectives and Functions of Cost Accounting 1.3 Cost Accounting and Financial Accounting — Comparison 1.3 Application of Cost Accounting 1.5 Advantages of Cost Accounting 1.6 Limitations or Objections Against cost Accounting 1.7 Installation of a costing system 1.7 Concept of Cost 1.9 Cost Centre 1.10 Cost Unit 1.11 Cost .File Size: 1MB

Cost-Tolerance Trades: Supplier Expertise Tolerance Cost High precision, high cost process Design tolerance defines the process required; small changes in tolerance may allow alignment to lower cost processes; only suppliers will know if the cost-tolerance sensitivity is high Moderate precision, moderate cost process Low precision, low cost process

z find out total fixed cost, total variable cost, average fixed cost, average variable cost, average total cost and marginal cost. 18.1 DEFINITION OF COST AND COST FUNCTION Cost is defined as the expenditure incurred by a firm or producer to purchase or hire factors of production in order to produce a product. As you know, factors of

z Develop low cost titanium powder for use in Powder Metallurgy (P/M) components and EB Hearth Melting Utilize powders from emerging low cost powder production technologies and low cost feed stocks z Develop, as-needed, parameters for powder and press and sinter technology for low cost Ti p

akuntansi musyarakah (sak no 106) Ayat tentang Musyarakah (Q.S. 39; 29) لًََّز ãَ åِاَ óِ îَخظَْ ó Þَْ ë Þٍجُزَِ ß ا äًَّ àَط لًَّجُرَ íَ åَ îظُِ Ûاَش

Collectively make tawbah to Allāh S so that you may acquire falāḥ [of this world and the Hereafter]. (24:31) The one who repents also becomes the beloved of Allāh S, Âَْ Èِﺑاﻮَّﺘﻟاَّﺐُّ ßُِ çﻪَّٰﻠﻟانَّاِ Verily, Allāh S loves those who are most repenting. (2:22

III. Tabular analysis The cost of production of the selected vegetables were calculated as per the standard cost concept viz; Cost-A, Cost-B, Cost-C and tabulated for interpretation. Cost concepts: These includes cost A 1, A 2, B 1, B 2, C 1, C 2 and C 3 Cost A 1: All actual expenses