Accepted Manuscript

2y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
1.29 MB
9 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Randy Pettway
Transcription

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Page 1 of 9doi:10.1017/S0029665121000574 The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society.This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributionlicence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.The Nutrition Society Winter Conference Live 2020 was held virtually on 8–9 December 2020Proceedings of the Nutrition SocietyConference on ‘Micronutrient malnutrition across the life course, sarcopenia andfrailty’Widdowson AwardHard facts and misfits: essential ingredients of public healthnutrition researchAnn Prentice1,21Medical Research Council Nutrition and Bone Health Group, University of Cambridge, Clifford Allbutt Building, HillsRoad, Cambridge CB2 0AH, England2Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, POBox 273, The GambiaPolicy decisions and the practice of public health nutrition need to be based on solid evidence, developed through rigorous research studies where objective measures are used andresults that run counter to dogma are not dismissed but investigated. In recent years,enhancements in study designs, and methodologies for systematic reviews and meta-analysis,have improved the evidence-base for nutrition policy and practice. However, these still relyon a full appreciation of the strengths and limitations of the measures on which conclusionsare drawn and on the thorough investigation of outcomes that do not fit expectations or prevailing convictions. The importance of ‘hard facts’ and ‘misfits’ in research designed toadvance knowledge and improve public health nutrition is illustrated in this paper througha selection of studies from different stages in my research career, focused on the nutritionalrequirements of resource-poor populations in Africa and Asia.Africa: Calcium: Evidence-based nutrition: Gambia: Vitamin DPolicy decisions and the practice of public health nutritionneed to be based on solid evidence, developed throughrigorous research studies where objective measures areused and results that run counter to dogma are not dismissed but investigated. Dr Elsie Widdowson, afterwhom this Nutrition Society Award was named, was apassionate advocate of this philosophy throughout herlong career, and she has been an inspiration to me andmany others engaged in public health nutrition research.These principles have been the bedrock of studies intothe nutritional requirements of resource-poor populationsin Africa and Asia that I have conducted or been involvedin over the years. A selection of these studies are describedin this paper to illustrate the importance of ‘hard facts andmisfits’ for research designed to advance knowledge andimprove public health nutrition.Lactational performance in poorly nourished womenThe problem of infant growth faltering in resource-poorregions of the world has long been recognised(1,2) andAbbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; SA-BMC, size-adjusted bone mineral content.Corresponding author: Ann Prentice, email ann.prentice@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.ukDownloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 209.126.7.155, on 02 May 2021 at 02:12:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available athttps://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665121000574

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society2A. Prenticeremains an intense area of research and public healthconcern. In the past, because breast-feeding of infantswas universally practised in these disadvantaged populations, it was assumed that growth faltering was a result ofcompromised pregnancy and lactation due to the mother’spoor nutritional status. In the 1970s, Professor RGWhitehead, Director of the MRC Dunn Nutrition Unitin Cambridge, established an intensive series of programmes in Cambridge and The Gambia, West Africa,to provide the scientific evidence on which nutritionalinterventions to reduce infant growth faltering could bebased. The Gambian research was based in the village ofKeneba and its neighbouring villages in the province ofWest Kiang, a remote and resource-poor region of thecountry. This region had been the subject of longitudinaldemographic and health surveys since 1950, primarily inconnection with malaria research. In this rural Gambiansociety at that time, malnutrition and poor infant growthwere already well documented, associated with marginaldiets, seasonal food shortages and high infection rates(3).Large family sizes were the norm and infants were customarily breast-fed for about 2 years with complementaryfoods introduced from about 4 months, making Kenebaan ideal location for this research. In Cambridge, a muchmore affluent society, nutrition and health provision wasgenerally good and breast-feeding, at least in the firstyear post-partum, was relatively common. Studies inCambridge among pregnant and lactating women wereconducted to provide comparative data for the Gambianstudies.The initial stages of the work involved establishing asmall team of scientists, doctors and other staff inKeneba to create a rapport with the local communityand develop culturally-sensitive research methods andprotocols. This was especially important for the lactationstudies in order to prevent any alteration in mother–infant behaviour that might interrupt breast-feeding, aproblem that was suspected in many of the studiescited in the literature up to that time(4). The ability tomeasure the breast-milk intake of babies in a nonintrusive manner was advanced by the development bythe MRC Dunn Nutrition Unit scientists of innovativestable isotope methods using 2H oxide, and these werepioneered in the Gambian and Cambridge lactation studies(5,6). Unexpectedly, these studies demonstrated thatGambian infants had similar breast-milk intakes tothose in Cambridge in the first months after birth whenthey were exclusively or predominantly breast-fed(4,7).The fact that the lactational performance of theseGambian women did not appear to be compromised bytheir poor diet was underscored by the results of maternal supplementation trials conducted during lactation.These trials used a specially prepared energy-protein-richbiscuit, made locally, and a vitamin-fortified tea drink.These trials demonstrated that improving the diet ofthe mother had no effect on the breast-milk intake orgrowth of the infant(8). There were increases in thebreast-milk content of certain vitamins present in thesupplement but only marginal effects on the macronutrient content(8). The most noteworthy effects were inmothers, who gained weight and reported fewer episodesof poor health. However, these women also had lowerconcentrations of several hormones associated with lactation, especially prolactin(9,10). This suggested that thesupplement had produced a relaxation from a state ofhigh metabolic efficiency and that much of the additionalenergy derived from the supplement was wasted in lessefficient metabolic processes(10). Furthermore, the lowerprolactin concentration of these mothers was associatedwith a shorter period of amenorrhoea(9). Even greatereffects on lowering prolactin and shortening the periodof amenorrhoea were seen when the Gambian mothersalso received the dietary supplement during pregnancy(11).As part of these early investigations, detailed studies ofbreast-milk composition revealed that the Gambianwomen had consistently lower breast-milk calcium concentrations than women in Cambridge, by about25 %(12,13). Breast-milk calcium concentration was shownto decrease as lactation progressed, tracking within individuals, and was independent of the volume of breast-milkconsumed by the infant(13–15). These findings indicated,therefore, that, on average, the Gambian breast-fed infantsconsumed considerably less calcium than their Cambridgecounterparts during exclusive breast-feeding and after theintroduction of complementary foods(16,17). With theexception of certain water-soluble vitamins whose concentration in breast-milk depends on maternal dietary intake,few components of breast-milk had been found to vary tothis extent between populations(18). A comparison ofbreast-milk calcium concentrations from different regionsof the world showed that women in populations with ahigh customary calcium intake, such as in the UK andNorth America, tended to have higher breast-milk calciumthan in African countries with a much lower dietary calcium intake(13,18). This led to the possibility that the calcium content of breast-milk might be dependent on thematernal intake.Hard factsThe objective studies conducted in The Gambia providedthe hard evidence that human lactational performance islittle affected by maternal nutritional status, other thanin severe malnutrition. Improvements in the diet ofpoorly nourished lactating mothers were shown tobenefit the woman in terms of nutritional status and perceptions of well-being, but also to decrease the period oflactational infertility, which may not be to her advantage. These results ran counter to expectations at thetime, but are now widely accepted and incorporatedinto textbooks and policy documents.MisfitsThe breast-milk calcium concentration of Gambianwomen was found to be considerably lower than thatof women in Cambridge and other regions of theworld. Since calcium is a primary bone-forming mineraland essential for infant skeletal growth and maternalbone health, this unexpected finding was noteworthyand indicated the need for more intensive studies into calcium nutrition in The Gambia.Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 209.126.7.155, on 02 May 2021 at 02:12:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available athttps://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665121000574

Proceedings of the Nutrition SocietyHard facts and misfits in nutrition research3Fig. 1. Effects on breast-milk calcium concentration of maternal calcium supplementation during (a) lactation and (b) the precedingpregnancy. The data are expressed as mean (SE) concentration (mg/l) in breast-milk collected serially from 60 and 125 rural Gambianmothers respectively during randomised placebo-controlled trials of calcium carbonate supplementation (lactation trial 1000 mgCa/dfor 12 months; pregnancy trial 1500 mgCa/d from 20 weeks gestation to delivery)(22,23). Dark bars, calcium-supplemented group;light bars, placebo group. The numbers of women in the calcium and placebo groups respectively who participated in the sub-studyof breast-milk calcium were: lactation trial 30, 30; pregnancy trial 61, 64. There were no significant differences between the groups atany time.Dietary calcium intake and breast-milk calciumThe unexpected finding of low breast-milk calcium concentrations among Gambian women led to a more thorough exploration of dietary calcium intake in thispopulation. The Gambian diet at that time was basedpredominantly on millet, sorghum and rice as staples,with groundnut (peanut)-, leaf- and vegetable-basedsauces. Fish were eaten occasionally, often as dried ingredients in sauces, but the diet rarely included meat ormilk. Dietary assessments were conducted, using detailedweighed intakes conducted by trained research assistants,combined with laboratory analysis of local foods andcondiments. Potential hidden sources of calcium, suchas flavourings, bush foods and pica, were also analysedand included in the estimates.These studies demonstrated that the customary diet inrural Gambia was, and still is, very low in calciumthroughout life(19,20). This is largely ascribed to a lackof animal milk and milk products in the diet. Scrutinyof FAO balance sheets confirmed the much lower milksupply in The Gambia, and many other African countries, compared to the UK, Europe, Northern Americaand Australasia(20). These studies provided the estimatesof average calcium intake of 300–400 mg/d in womenand children, and 200 mg/d in infants(17,19). These intakesare considerably lower than international dietary reference values and recommendations(21). Such low intakeswere surprising given that they are very close to thedaily biological requirements for fetal growth, breastmilk production and childhood mineral accretion, evenbefore making allowance for the reduced amount of calcium that can be absorbed from the diet(15).We conducted two randomised placebo-controlledsupplementation trials to test whether raising the calciumintake of Gambian mothers would increase breast-milkcalcium concentration and infant growth: the first duringlactation, the second during pregnancy. The motherswere supplemented with 1000 mg Ca/d from 2 weekspost-partum for 12 months in the lactation trial(22) andwith 1500 mg Ca/d from 20 weeks gestation to deliveryin the pregnancy trial(23). In both trials, the supplementwas orange-flavoured, chewable calcium carbonate. Thesupplement was well accepted by the mothers and compliance was high. Breast-milk samples were obtainedserially at specific times post-partum using carefullystandardised collection and assay protocols(24). No significant differences were found between the calciumsupplemented and placebo groups in either trial(Fig. 1), thus demonstrating that breast-milk calciumconcentration is not responsive to changes in maternalcalcium intake. There was also no effect on the growthof the infants in terms of rates of increase in weightand length(22,23,25). In addition, in the pregnancy trial,there were no differences in the mother’s blood pressurebetween groups at any stage of pregnancy or lactation,nor was there an effect of the calcium supplement oninfant birth size(25).Hard factsContrary to common perceptions at the time, theGambian studies demonstrated that breast-milk calciumcontent is not influenced by maternal calcium intake.This is now widely accepted and has largely stoppedthe practice of mothers with low calcium intakes beingadvised either not to breast-feed or to take calcium supplements in lactation in order to boost breast-milk calcium. The pregnancy trial also showed that the increasein calcium intake in these mothers did not produce benefits in terms of maternal blood pressure or fetal growth.Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 209.126.7.155, on 02 May 2021 at 02:12:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available athttps://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665121000574

4A. PrenticeMisfitsThese detailed studies showed that the customary diet inrural Gambia is very low in calcium, in common withmany other resource-poor communities in Africa, atintakes very close to the biological requirement forbone mineral accretion and maintenance. This suggestedthat skeletal mineral content might be compromised inthese populations during times of increased biologicalrequirement, such as pregnancy, lactation and periodsof rapid childhood growth.Proceedings of the Nutrition SocietyCalcium requirements for maternal and infantbone healthDuring the 1980s, Dr Elsie Widdowson was awarded theprestigious Rank Prize in Nutrition, with which sheendowed a fellowship at the MRC Dunn NutritionUnit to work with me and the teams in Cambridge andKeneba to study the calcium requirements of mothersand children in Africa. This prompted the purchase ofa single-photon absorptiometer, one of the first instruments designed to measure bone mineral content in vivothat could be used in healthy infants, children and adults.This was the start of the Nutrition and Bone HealthResearch Group based in the MRC Dunn NutritionUnit and then in MRC Human Nutrition Research atthe Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, and funds wereobtained to set up parallel bone imaging facilities inCambridge and The Gambia. The single-photon absorptiometer has been replaced over the years by new generations of bone scanning instruments as they became moresophisticated. Our more recent studies have predominantly used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.To consider whether a low maternal calcium intakeduring lactation might necessitate mobilisation of skeletal calcium to support breast-milk production, we conducted a series of studies in Cambridge to investigatewhether the bone mineral content of well-nourishedbreast-feeding mothers alters during and after lactation,and whether any changes are related to maternal calciumintake(12–14,26,27). These studies demonstrated that measurable decreases in size-adjusted bone mineral content(SA-BMC) occur in the first few months of lactation, predominantly at the lumbar spine and hip, and that theseare reversed in later lactation or after breast-feedingstops(26). The magnitude of the decreases after 3 monthsof exclusive breast-feeding was shown to vary betweenindividuals, depending on the volume of breast-milk produced and other factors(27). However, no correlationswith maternal calcium intake or breast-milk calcium concentration were found, despite the wide range of calciumintakes between the study participants(27).To investigate this further, bone scanning was conducted to chart the skeletal changes during lactation inboth the Gambian lactation and pregnancy calcium supplementation trials described earlier. The expectationswere that the skeletal response to lactation would beless among women in the calcium-supplemented groupFig. 2. Effects on size-adjusted bone mineral content (SA-BMC) ofthe lumbar spine (L1–4) of maternal calcium supplementationduring pregnancy in Gambian mothers. The data are expressed asmean percentage difference (SE) relative to the placebo group at0 5 months post-partum. The scans were obtained usingdual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as part of a randomisedplacebo-controlled trial of 1500 mgCa/d from 20 weeks gestationto delivery with follow-up. Measurements in the DXA sub-studywere made serially on each individual during the index lactation at0 5, 3 and 12 months(28) and approximately 5 years later at a timewhen the mother was neither pregnant nor lactating and at least 3months since the end of a recent lactation period (NPNL)(30). Thenumbers of measurements at each timepoint for the calcium andplacebo groups respectively were 0 5 months 23, 27; 3 months 29, 29; 12 months 40, 39; NPNL 31, 28. Dark bars,calcium-supplemented group; light bars, placebo group. Thechanges over time were significantly different between the twogroups: in the index lactation P for interaction 0 05; in thefollow-up study P for interaction 0 002.than in the placebo group because the requirement tomobilise bone calcium to support breast-milk productionwould be lower, given the greater amount of calciumavailable from the diet. The results showed that thiswas not the case. In the lactation trial, which was performed at a time when only forearm scanning by singlephoton absorptiometer was available, the expecteddecrease and reversal in SA-BMC was observed, butthere were no significant differences between thegroups(22). In the pregnancy trial, which was conductedseveral years after the lactation trial, whole-body andregional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans wereobtained to 12 months of lactation. The expecteddecrease in SA-BMC was observed in the first monthsof lactation but there was little sign of recovery of bonemineral by 12 months post-partum (Fig. 2)(28). The likelyexplanation for this was that, unlike most mothers in theCambridge studies, all the mothers in the Gambian pregnancy trial were still breast-feeding on demand at 12months and would not have begun to wean their infantfrom the breast. More surprisingly, and contrary toexpectations, there were greater decreases in lumbarspine and whole-body SA-BMC in the mothers whoDownloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 209.126.7.155, on 02 May 2021 at 02:12:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available athttps://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. htt

Nutrition Research Reviews is published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society Hard facts and misfits: essential ingredients of public health nutrition research Ann Prentice1,2 1. Medical Research Council Nutrition and Bone Health Group, Clifford Allbutt Building, U

Related Documents:

111. Burt Bacharach 4. All That Heaven Allows Rep. Manuscript Away All Boats Rep. Manuscript Swell Guy Rep. Manuscript Star in the Dust Rep. Manuscript Shenandoah Rep. Manuscript Music by Frank Skinner Universal Studios 4-78RPM Back Street Arabian Nights Saboteur Back Street (A Collection) Universal Studios Universal Studios

Registered Charity Number 207890 Accepted Manuscript This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the RSC Publishing peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, which is

means the first manuscript from the 7th century containing the whole Bible. The siglum 6t1 indicates the first manuscript of the Psalms from the 6th century, which is the oldest manuscript that contains the East Syriac headings. The headings of the Psalms in

The Voynich Manuscript, MS 408 in the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library at Yale University, has been called “the most mysterious manuscript in the world” (Brumbaugh 1977: title). Description of the document can be found on the Yale website (Yale Library 2013), and the manuscript can be seen inFile Size: 2MB

The Voynich Manuscript is an undeciphered document from medieval Europe. We present current knowledge about the manuscript's text through a series of questions about its linguis-tic properties. 1 Introduction The Voynich manuscript, also referred to as the VMS, is an illu

The Voynich Manuscript Folio Astronomical 68v3 Abstract: The Voynich Manuscript astronomical folio 68v3 resembles a drawing found in an Armenian manuscript. The decoded hieroglyphs provide the names of a number of constella@ons and contrary to medieval teachings proposes tha

Voynich Manuscript Revealed 3 Abstract The Voynich Manuscript is a 15th century book written by an unknown author(s) which has been the subject of worldwide debates within the academic community. The philological study outlined below reveals that the Voynich Manuscript was written in a Turk

The Voynich manuscript is a document written in unknown alphabets that was found by Wilfrid Voynich (1865-1930) in 1912 [1]. Because of the Voynich manuscript‟s long history, some pages of manuscript were missing. As the result, there are almost 240 pages remaining [2]. In addition, th