Trial Statistics Jan 2020 - United States Patent And .
Trial StatisticsIPR, PGR, CBMPatent Trial and Appeal BoardJanuary 2020
Petitions by Trial Type(All Time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)Trial types include Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), and CoveredBusiness Method (CBM).3
Petitions Filed by Technology in FY20(FY20: Oct. 1, 2019 to Jan. 31, 2020)4
Petitions Filed by Month(Jan. 2019 and Previous 12 Months: Jan. 1, 2019 to Jan. 31, 2020)5
Institution Rates(FY13 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)Institution rate for each fiscal year is calculated by dividing petitions instituted bydecisions on institution (i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomesof decisions on institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.6
Institution Rates by Technology(All Time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)Institution rate for each technology is calculated by dividing petitions instituted bydecisions on institution (i.e., petitions instituted plus petitions denied). The outcomesof decisions on institution responsive to requests for rehearing are excluded.7
Pre-Institution Settlements(FY13 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)Settlement RateSettlementsSettlement rate for each year is calculated by dividing pre-institution settlements bythe sum of proceedings instituted, denied institution, dismissed, terminated with arequest for adverse judgment, and settled before decision on institution.8
Post-Institution Settlements(FY13 to FY20: Oct. 1, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)Settlement RateSettlementsSettlement rate for each year is calculated by dividing post-institution settlements byproceedings terminated post-institution (i.e., settled, dismissed, terminated with arequest for adverse judgment, and final written decision), excluding joined cases.9
Status of Petitions(All Time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020)These figures reflect the latest status of each petition. The outcomes of decisions oninstitution responsive to requests for rehearing are incorporated. Once joined to a basecase, a petition remains in the Joined category regardless of subsequent outcomes.10
Outcome of concluded proceedings(All time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2019)Institution Denied2,99933%InstitutedFWD AllPatentableDenied5872,8386%FWD 303433%Mixed33%5166%FWD Mixed5396%Settled2,65629%FWD All Unpatentable1,908Settled21%Requested AdverseJudgment3714%Joined and dismissed cases are excluded.2,55430%Percentage of the Final Written Decisions587 (19%)539 (18%)FWD All Patentable1,908 (63%)FWD All UnpatentableFWD Mixed11
Trial Statistics IPR, PGR, CBM Patent Trial and Appeal Board January 2020. 3 Petitions by Trial Type (All Time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Jan. 31, 2020) Trial types include Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), and Covered Business Method (CBM). 4 Petitions Filed by Technology in FY20
QRP Fox Hunt 0200Z-0330Z, Jan 6 NCCC Sprint 0230Z-0300Z, Jan 6 PODXS 070 Club PSKFest 0000Z-2400Z, Jan 7 WW PMC Contest 1200Z, Jan 7 to 1200Z, Jan 8 SKCC Weekend Sprintathon 1200Z, Jan 7 to 2400Z, Jan 8 Original QRP Contest 1500Z, Jan 7 to 1500Z, Jan 8 Kid's Day Contest 1800Z-2359Z, Jan 7 ARRL RTTY Roundup 1800Z, Jan 7 to 2400Z, Jan 8
historically elevated (and is expected to remain so). 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11 Jan-13 Jan-15 Jan-17 Jan-19 Jan-21 /MT High-Analysis Phosphate Global Net Price Calculated from Published Weekly Spot Prices 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Jan-20 Jul-20 Jan-21 Jul-21 Jan-22 /MT Global DAP/MAP Benchmark .
Trial Statistics IPR, PGR, CBM Patent Trial and Appeal Board September 2020. IPR 11,299 93%. CBM 602 5%. PGR 246 2%. 12,147 Total. 3. Petitions by Trial Type (All Time: Sept. 16, 2012 to Sept. 30, 2020) Trial types include Inter Partes Review (IPR ), Post Grant Review (PGR ), and Covered
Lake Erie ‐ Niagara River Monthly Hydrology: 2004‐2013 relative to 1926‐2013 0 50 100 150 200 250 2004 Jan 2005 Jan 2006 Jan 2007 Jan 2008 Jan 2009 Jan 2010 Jan 2011 Jan 2012 Jan 2013 Jan Basin Precipitation [% of LTA] ‐0.30 ‐0.20 ‐0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Water Level [m from LTA] ‐1,000 ‐500 0 500 1,000 1,500
Domestic and regional forces shaping Asia Asian consumer demand to support future growth Note: (1) HSBC Global Research Industrial output, 2000-20091 Asia recovery1 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 90 95 100 105 110 115 EM Asia G3 USA Helping lift personal incomes and .
Written Comprehensives for Double Major Seniors Only AS NEEDED JAN 6-7 JAN 5-6 JAN 4-5 JAN 9-10 Written Comprehensives for Seniors JAN 10-11 JAN 9-10 JAN 8-9 JAN 13-14 Oral Comprehensive Exams for Seniors JAN 12-14
Thu, Jan 21 Chapter 4 Simple Soccer Anatomy Fri, Jan 22 Chapter 4 Simple Soccer Anatomy Sun, Jan 24 3 - Tank States [5%] 3Mon, Jan 25 Chapter 4 Simple Soccer Anatomy Tue, Jan 26 Futures: TBD Wed, Jan 27 4 - My Team [3%] Thu, Jan 28 Brainstorming: Simple Soccer Strategy Fri, Jan 29 Chapter 6 LUA Scripting Sun, Jan 31 5 - Team Design [3%]
Financial Accounting Working Papers, Robert F. Meigs, Jan R. Williams, Sue Haka, Susan F. Haka, Mark S Bettner, Jun 1, 2000, Business & Economics, 400 pages. . Accounting Chapters 1-14 The Basis for Business Decisions, Robert F. Meigs, Jan R. Williams, Sue Haka, Susan F. Haka, Mark S. Bettner, Sep 1, 1998, Business & Economics, . The Study Guide enables the students to measure their progress .
