DHS Integrated Eligibility Determination Project Using (ONE)

2y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
734.77 KB
13 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Lucca Devoe
Transcription

DHS Integrated EligibilityDetermination ProjectUsing(ONE)Presentation to Joint Interim LegislativeCommittee on Information Management& TechnologyClyde Saiki, DHS Director (Interim)Sarah Miller, DHS COO for TechnologyJanuary 2016

DHS Integrated Eligibility Determination Project OverviewKentucky has expanded its Eligibility Determination system, nowcalled benefind, to include other human services programs,including Non-MAGI Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, and ERDCDHS seeks to expand OHA’s ONE System to take advantage of thisincreased functionality for our human services programs2 Kentucky already transferred the benefind code to Oregon for DHS use DHS is committed to making minimum necessary system customizations toONE system, and changing policy and business processes wherever feasible

Comparing Oregon and Kentucky Programs A side-by-side comparison of KY and OR programs was completed DHS team went to Kentucky to observe benefind in operations andto compare service delivery models; findings included: Minor variations in eligibility criteria exist Similar caseload volumes exist DHS business processes are more advanced then KY’s butcould be further enhanced with benefind functionality Enhancements would be required for DHS’s operationalreporting needsOverall: Strong belief that benefind transfercould work for Oregon with limited changes3

The Future of DHS Eligibility SystemsEligibility Determinations for DHS Non-MAGI Medicaid, SNAP, TANFand Childcare programs will be made through enhancing 4Using ONE, applicants will fill out a single application for multiple programs OHA uses it for MAGI Medicaid eligibility DHS uses it for Non-MAGI Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, and ERDC eligibility Just like ONE passes eligibility to MMIS for MAGI Medicaid, DHS will buildinterfaces from ONE to other systems for benefit issuance (i.e. EBT cards, etc) Several aging DHS legacy systems can be replaced with proven, current technology Faster, efficient, and accurate eligibility determinations can be made acrossmultiple program areas Accurate information for data reporting and analysis will be available

High Level Project Business Objectives1.Allow applicants to provide information online once for multiple programs 2.5Online application portal extends the hours of access for applicants,reduces the need to travel to local offices, streamlines eligibilitydetermination servicesEliminate manual processes for multiple program areas in order to: Reduce the amount of time that elapses between completing anapplication and receiving an eligibility determination Reduce the amount of time that DHS staff spend creating, reviewing, andacting on each application Reduce the rate of errors in making eligibility determinations

A Future Day in the Life of a ONE Eligibility WorkerEligibility WorkerLog InDashboardData EntryAuthorize BenefitsVerificationYesSingle Sign OnRequest forInformationSystemgeneratescorrespondencePull appropriate taskfrom queue. Managefrom your dashboardComplete ApplicantRegistration and t provides unVerificationData needed to runverification is receivedand enteredCurrent state for OHA workers,Future state for DHS workers6Authorize theappropriate benefitsAuthorize BenefitsAuthorize theappropriate benefits

Project ApproachPhasePlanning &Fit-GapWhat We Will Do Create Foundational Project Management DeliverablesTransfer latest system code from KY to ORAssemble DHS Project Team & System Integrator Project TeamCompare base KY system to OR business needs, identify gaps that must be addressedDesign Finalize system functional & technical requirements for OregonDefine future-state business processes supporting new capabilitiesCapture all changes occurring as a result of the new technology and processesPlan to move data from existing systems into the new tool, prepare for data conversionCommunicate with staff and stakeholders about the projectBuild Build technology, integrating and “talking to” current state systems not being replacedWrite business/operations scenarios that simulate how the system is usedDevelop detailed training coursesCommunicate specifics about changes and benefits that ONE will bringTest Extensively test the system to confirm it is running correctly and works with other systemsDHS currently usesMake final adjustments to technology and processes as necessary, based on the results oftests Implement7 Conduct training to help staff and others learn new technology and processes“Turn on” the system to perform business processesConduct additional training as neededDecommission DHS legacy systems

Why Now? Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) funds Medicaideligibility system projects at 90%FF/10%GF match Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) funds SNAP eligibility projects at50%FF/50%GF match Administration on Children and Families (ACF) does not providefunding for TANF or Childcare eligibility projects (100%GF) toblock grant states like Oregon CMS, FNS, ACF developed a joint “A-87” Cost Allocation Exceptionallowing for sharing of costs across all three program areas so thatthe Federal/State match estimated at 85%FF/15%GF 8Advanced Planning Document requesting funding permission from all threeagencies was submitted on 12/24/15If completed prior to 12/31/2018, using cost allocation saves almost 40Million in State GF

So What’s Different for DHS This Time?1. Establish clear, defined governance process, including partnership with theState CIO’s office2. Spend sufficient time planning in support of project objectives3. Minimize changes to the transfer system; be willing to change policy andbusiness process before making technology changes4. Set scope and stick to it; use a defined scope management process for changes5. Use architecture and technology that exists in OHA/DHS and supports similarprograms in other states6. Follow a defined methodology for organizational change management; usesystem integrator to supplement business expertise and experience9

So What’s Different for DHS This Time?7. Ensure business leaders “own” organizational change management and act astranslator between project, IT, and business operations, focusing on gettingusers ready for system8. Dedicate communication professionals to the project9. Develop better accounting for spending and federal billing purposes10. Balance timely decision making with substantive analysis11. Set realistic expectations for project staff workloads; the project should be amarathon, not a sprint with many interim milestones that deliver value12. Define partnership between system integrator and business in order to getproject accomplished using defined roles and responsibilities10

What About All the Changes in Kentucky?New Governor took office in December 2015, creating two major changes Close kynect – the Kentucky Health Insurance Exchange andtransition to the Federally Facilitated Marketplace (FFM) Delaying the implementation rollout of benefind from December28, 2015 to February 1, 2016What does this mean for ONE System in Oregon? Nothing, OHA successfully implemented ONE on December 15,2015 in OregonWhat does this mean for implementing Oregon’s Integrated Eligibilitysolution? Nothing, Oregon is already in possession of the code base forbenefind in its code repositoryCan Oregon do anything to help Kentucky? Perhaps, OHA has developed code to connect its Medicaidprogram with Federal Healthcare.gov; we will offer to share thatwith KY.11

What’s Next?1. Seek legislative approval for funding & project relatedpositions in February 2016 session2. Negotiate contract with System Integrator – DeloitteConsulting – with separate statements of work for theFit/Gap Assessment and the Implementation work3. Negotiate contract with quality assurance firm – PublicKnowledge – mirroring approach with System Integrator4. Identify roles & responsibilities for project team members,and resource staffing plan for Fit/Gap Assessment work5. Complete project management foundational documentsfor Stage Gate 3 endorsement at the end of the Fit/GapAssessment phase, in consultation with Office of the StateCIO12

Project Team Contact InformationFor additional information regarding the DHS Integrated EligibilityDetermination Project, email the project arah Miller, DHS COO for Technologysarah.s.miller@state.or.us13

2 DHS Integrated Eligibility Determination Project Overview Kentucky already transferred the benefind code to Oregon for DHS use DHS is committed to making minimum necessary system customizations to ONE system, and changing policy and business processes wherever feasible Kentuc

Related Documents:

Staniel ss steel /TAN Length 65 – 145 mm Outer diameter 13 mm DHS Emergency Screw Stainless steel Length 50 –145 mm Outer diameter 14 mm Plates DHS plate with DCP holes Used for more than 25 years. Stainless steel / TAN Barrel angle 130 –150 2 to 20 holes Barrel length: standard and short Thickness 5.8 mm

Nov 09, 2017 · NY JFK CURRID KATHLEEN A kathleen.a.currid@cbp.dhs.gov NY Buffalo DIAMOND RICHARD P richard.p.diamond@cbp.dhs.gov NY JFK DISALVO JOSEPH joseph.disalvo@cbp.dhs.gov NY Alexandria Bay ERWIN DARREN R darren.r.erwin@cbp.dhs.gov NY Massena GRANIE DOUGLAS douglas.m.granie@cbp.dhs.gov NY Alexandria Ba

DHS PD 4300A, 5.3.a Audit Trail Content DHS PD 4300A, 5.3.b: Financial/PII Audit Review DHS PD 4300A, 5.3.c: Audit Records and Logs Protection DHS PD 4300A, 5.3.e: Risks from PII DHS PD 4300A, 5.3

In 1996, the DHS initiated the development of a forensic interviewing protocol by establishing a committee within DHS and enlisting 9 county DHS offices to participate as pilot counties in testing the protocol. 1996-1998, DHS and the GTF worked with Dr. Debra Poole in developing and

The scope of TIE is limited to internal DHS ICAM data for authoritative sources, and to internal DHS consuming applications. 4 This means TIE applies to the Sensitive but Unclassified 3 Whether or not a user receives a reason for denied access is

MI Detroit Field Office MCNAMARA, PATRICK E PATRICK.E.MCNAMARA@CBP.DHS.GOV MI Detroit MILLER, KRISTI L KRISTI.L.MILLER@cbp.dhs.gov MI Detroit PREVILLE, DIANE M DIANE.M.PREVILLE@CBP.DHS.GOV MI Detroit Metro Airport RAMIREZ, SHERRY SHERRY.RAMIREZ@CBP.DHS.GOV MI Detroit RUBINO, MATTEO A

Honolulu, Hawaii 96809-0339 IV. Processing of completed DHS 1135 and DHS 1136 forms. A. ASO/BP will pre-audit and process all forms completed correctly for payment. B. ASO/BP will return incomplete forms to the taxi provider for correction, completion, and resubmittal. C. ASO/BP will forward all other DHS 1135 and DHS 1136 forms to MQD/Medical

4 Chaminade Pierette (Air de Ballet), Op. 41 Piano Music by Female Composers (4th revised edition 2011) (Schott) 5 Chen Peixun Thunder in Drought Season 100 Years of Chinese Piano Music: Vol. III Works in Traditional Style, Book II Instrumental Music (Shanghai Conservatory of Music Press) A B C. 35 Online edition (July 2020) Piano 2021 & 2022 Grade 8 COMPOSER PIECE / WORK / ARRANGER .