Bridging The Physical Scales In Evolutionary Biology: From .

1y ago
746.48 KB
10 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 1m ago
Upload by : Louie Bolen

Available online at www.sciencedirect.comScienceDirectBridging the physical scales in evolutionary biology:from protein sequence space to fitness of organismsand populationsShimon Bershtein1, Adrian WR Serohijos2 andEugene I Shakhnovich3Bridging the gap between the molecular properties of proteinsand organismal/population fitness is essential forunderstanding evolutionary processes. This task requires theintegration of the several physical scales of biologicalorganization, each defined by a distinct set of mechanisms andconstraints, into a single unifying model. The molecular scale isdominated by the constraints imposed by the physicochemical properties of proteins and their substrates, which giverise to trade-offs and epistatic (non-additive) effects ofmutations. At the systems scale, biological networks modulateprotein expression and can either buffer or enhance the fitnesseffects of mutations. The population scale is influenced by themutational input, selection regimes, and stochastic changesaffecting the size and structure of populations, which eventuallydetermine the evolutionary fate of mutations. Here, wesummarize the recent advances in theory, computersimulations, and experiments that advance our understandingof the links between various physical scales in biology.Addresses1Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,Beer-Sheva 84501, Israel2Département de Biochimie, Centre Robert-Cedergren enBioinformatique & Génomique, Université de Montréal, Montréal,QC H3T 1J4, Canada3Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University,12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United StatesCorresponding author: Shakhnovich, Eugene I([email protected])Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2017, 42:31–40This review comes from a themed issue on Folding and bindingEdited by Jane Clarke and Rohit V ructure, function and intracellular abundances, selection operates directly on the phenotypes and its outcomedepends on fitness of organisms and populations. Understanding the link between the molecular effect of mutations and their fitness effects, the genotype-phenotypegap, is a major problem in biology. The relationshipbetween the biophysical properties of macromoleculesand their fitness effects is complex [1] and is influencedby various mechanisms operating at the molecular,systems, organismal, and, finally, population scales[2,3,4 ,5,6,7 ,8 ,9–14]. Although each scale of biologicalorganization is usually studied independently by traditional scientific disciplines, it is becoming clear thatmore accurate understanding of evolutionary processeswill depend on integrating these scales into a unifiedmodel [10].A useful concept to visualize the linkage between genotype and phenotype in biology is fitness landscape. Theconcept was originally introduced by Sewall Wright inthe early 1930s [15]. Wright’s landscape can be easilyimagined in three dimensions (in reality it is highlymultidimensional) where axes x and y represent allelefrequencies at loci 1 and 2, while axis z (the height)represents the mean fitness of a population. In such arepresentation, peaks and valleys describe, respectively,high and low mean fitness of a population. Selection isviewed as a force driving the allele frequencies to increasea population’s mean fitness over time. However, if thelandscape is rugged, that is, characterized by multiplepeaks, selection is most likely to push a population to thenearest peak (local optimum), thus, effectively, locking itin a suboptimal fitness [16]. Climbing to the highest peakof the landscape (the global optimum) would requirepassing through a fitness valley that is disfavoured byselection.0959-440/# 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.IntroductionThe direction of evolution is shaped by the interplay ofmutations and selection. These two factors operate onvastly different scales: while mutations perturb the biophysical properties of proteins, potentially altering theirwww.sciencedirect.comThe common use of the ‘fitness landscape’ metaphoroften involves discrete values of fitness that correspondto specific alleles [16–18], or, more generally, discretesequence variants [17,18]. However, such representations are limited to known variants, and their predictivepower of the effects and evolutionary consequences ofde novo mutations is limited. Conversely, full representation of the fitness landscape in sequence space is stillvery challenging due to high dimensionality of suchmapping.Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2017, 42:31–40

32 Folding and bindingIt is important to note that the term ‘fitness’ is often usedin a variety of contexts that might be different from thetraditional use of the term by Wright who defined fitnessas a quantity that is proportional to the mean number ofproduced viable and fertile progeny [19]. For example,‘fitness’ can stand in the literature for an organismalphenotype, systems level response, biological functionof a protein, and, in case of sequence space-based landscapes, a molecular property that directly affects a protein’s biological function [20–22]. Thus, the concept of‘fitness’ is often interpreted to mean functional ratherthan reproductive capacity. However, in our view, such abroad definition of fitness detracts from the main conundrum in evolution that mutations and selection are separated by several levels of biological organization. To thatend, we will exclusively use the term ‘fitness’ in thetraditional sense close to Wright’s as a phenotypic traitthat is under selection and, as such, determines theoutcome of a competitive evolutionary scenario in thewild, or in laboratory experiments. In the subsequentdiscussion we focus on organism-based definition of fitness as a reproductive capacity or related phenotypictraits of an organism linked to its specific genotype ratherthan a more traditional Wright’s view of fitness as meanreproductive capacity of a population. We also note thatspecific phenotypic traits that are most relevant for theoutcome of a competition might depend on the environment and ecological scenarios under which the competition occurs.Another challenge that limits our ability to predict thedirection and outcomes of evolution is that structure of apopulation has a crucial effect on how it evolves on thefitness landscape. Theoretical population genetics predicts that population size controls the balance betweenthe forces of selection and random genetic drift; thiseventually determines the direction of evolution on thefitness landscape. Earlier studies appreciated the role ofpopulation size, deriving an ‘effective population size’ tofit the genetics or the evolutionary data to existing population genetics models [23]. Nevertheless, direct experimental evidence for this fundamental concept is veryscarce due to the inherent difficulty of simultaneouslycontrolling the population size and obtaining tractablemolecular readouts of evolutionary processes in a configurable and reproducible environment of a laboratoryexperiment, or in multiscale organism-based simulations.To address these challenges, several authors have recently introduced the concept of a ‘biophysical fitness landscape’. The key premise of a biophysical fitness landscapeis that the gap between genotype and fitness is bridgedthrough the intermediate phenotype-molecular biophysical properties of proteins (Figure 1). In this approach thesequence-fitness gap might be overcome in two (or more)steps: (A) from sequence variation to variation of themolecular and systems-level properties of proteinsCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology 2017, 42:31–40(panels a–c in Figure 1) and (B) from variation of themolecular (stability, activity, etc.) and systems-level properties (e.g. abundances) to the organismal fitness effectsreflected in a biophysical fitness landscape (panel d inFigure 1) to the fate of a mutation in a population (fixationor loss, panel e in Figure 1). The key assumption of thisapproach is that the complexity of mapping sequencevariation to changes in the molecular properties (step Aabove, from panel a to panels b,c in Figure 1)) is at the rootof the complexity of the sequence-fitness relationship(‘ruggedness of fitness landscape’). Molecular effects ofmutations are complex, degenerate and epistatic: similarmolecular effects can be caused by different mutationsand they strongly depend on the molecular background[9,22,24,25 ]. However, at the next level(s) (step B), therelationship between changes in the molecular properties(stability, activity, aggregation propensity), cellular (intracellular abundance), and the ensuing phenotypiceffects might be much less degenerate and predictive,giving rise to a smooth fitness landscape in the space ofmolecular properties of proteins (Figure 1). It is alsoimportant to note that pleiotropy, when mutations haveconflicting effects on different molecular traits, is anothermajor source of epistasis. In terms of the biophysicalfitness landscape this means that projection of individualmutational effects could lead to complex trajectories inthe space of biophysical parameters. In this review wepresent recent theoretical, computational and experimental studies that elaborate on and further develop theseideas.From protein sequence space to proteinbiophysicsMaynard Smith was first to suggest that evolution can beviewed as a walk through a protein sequence space [26].Assuming an L-residue long protein sequence, its sequence space will constitute a network of 20L sequencesinterconnected through edges, each representing achange in a single residue. Each of the sequences isassigned a value (a molecular property such as thermodynamic stability, or function), thus forming a discretelandscape of the sequence space. Because mutationsare rare, evolutionary trajectories are thought to traversethe sequence space by single mutation steps, withoutpassing through non-functional intermediates. Theresulting accessible fraction of the interconnected functional sequences constitutes the (nearly) neutral proteinnetwork [27–30]. If the effect of each mutation on fitnessis independent on the genetic background on which itoccurs, the resulting fitness landscape will contain a singlepeak populated by optimal sequences with multipleevolutionary trajectories leading to it. Conversely, shouldepistasis (non-additivity of mutations) be prevalent, fitness effect of a mutation might be beneficial or detrimental depending on the genetic background [31,32 ].Epistasis can severely constrain the accessible evolutionary pathways, and create a rugged fitness landscape

From sequences to fitness Bershtein, Serohijos and Shakhnovich 33Figure 1(a)(b)Sequence scale(c)Molecular scaleWildtype1Folded fractionSystems scale0.80.60.4mutant0.20–202468WildtypeBound fraction1sequence to structure& function of proteinsWildtype0.8modulation & regulationby biological netwroks0.6mutant0.40.2010 –4mutantFunctional capacityStability, kcal/molmutant10.80.6Wildtype0.40.20010 –210 010 2246810cytoplasmic abundance10 4Product turnoverAffinity, 810Enzyme Efficiency, k cat/K m(d)(e)Organismal scalePopulation scaleFitness effect of a mutation:s Fitnessconsequence onreproductive capacityevolutionary successof mutationsbiophysicWildtypeal trait,rait,XtsicaliophybYfitnessmutant fitnesswildtypefitnesswildtypeProbability of fixation:Pfix 1 exp(–2s)1 exp(–2Ne s)Current Opinion in Structural BiologyBiophysics as a stepping stone between sequence and phenotype. Closing the genotype-phenotype gap is facilitated by an intermediateprojection of organismal fitness to biophysical properties of macromolecules. While the effect of sequence variation (panel a) on molecular traits(e.g. folding stability, binding affinity, catalytic activity, panel b) might be complex, the ensuing relation between variation of the observablebiophysical traits (vertical axes in panel b) and their fitness effect on the organism might be simple and predictable in some cases (panel d andFigure 2). The effects of mutations are also modulated by a regulation of biological networks (panel c) that might also have simple integrativeeffect on fitness. On the level of populations, the probability of fixing a specific mutation is a function of the effect of a mutation (selectioncoefficient) and an effective population size (Ne). Note a different interpretation of fitness landscape in (panel d) from classical Wright’s wheremean fitness of the population versus allele frequencies is usually plotted.multiple local optima separated from each other and theglobal fitness peak by trajectories passing through nonfunctional sequence states [33 ,34,35]. Kaltenbachet al. [33 ] examined the evolutionary reversibility ofphosphotriesterase that was evolved by directed evolution to arylesterase and back, and found that many of theoriginal amino acid exchanges between the new and theoriginal function could not be tolerated, and an alternativewww.sciencedirect.comset of mutations was needed to restore the phosphodiesterase activity. Extensive epistasis made the adaptivefitness landscape in sequence space highly rugged, and,although the evolutionary trajectories were phenotypically (at the level of protein phenotype, function) reversible,the genotypic trajectory became irreversible, suggestingthat the new and the original activities constitute separatefitness peaks [36].Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2017, 42:31–40

34 Folding and bindingWhich biophysical properties determine the epistatic interaction between mutations? Various mechanisms wereproposed, including protein-ligand or protein-DNA binding [25 ,37,38 ], protein conformation [33 ,39], and allostery [40]. However, protein stability appears to be themost prevalent mechanism of intramolecular epistasis[7 ,41 ,42,43]. Since most mutations destabilize proteinstructures [14,44], it was asserted that protein evolution isoften accompanied by stability-activity trade-offs [45].Indeed, Gong et al. [41 ] demonstrated that evolutionof influenza nucleoprotein is constrained by a stabilityrelated epistasis: acquisition of stabilizing mutations wasrequired before obtaining the adaptive substitutions,which, on their own, caused adverse effects due to destabilization of the nucleoprotein and, therefore, were evolutionary inaccessible. Stability activity trade-off is oftencast as the effect of stabilizing mutations on ‘flexibility’ ofthe protein which is detrimental to ‘functional proteindynamics’ [46,47]. Experimental studies indeed showedthat mutations introduced in the active site of a proteinstabilize the protein yet make it less or completely inactive[48]. However, more comprehensive analyses wheremutations were introduced throughout the protein, andnot just in the active site, showed no inverse relationbetween stability and activity [36,49]. Moreover, a weakpositive correlation between activity and stability wasobserved for multiple variants of dihydrofolate reductase(DHFR) from Escherichia coli [36]. Nonetheless, a highlystabilizing mutation in the active site of DHFR, D27F,completely eliminated its function [36], similar to whatwas observed for another enzyme in [48]. The apparentdisparity of the conclusions from substitutions in/near theactive site and elsewhere in the protein can be rationalizedby the observation that most ‘random’ mutations in proteins are destabilizing [13,44,50]. Carving an active site onan enzyme requires several functional substitutions,which, from the point of view of an independent trait– stability – could be random or even detrimental (e.g.,placing charged residues in partly buried areas of theprotein). Thus, activity-stability trade-off could be realfor substitutions in the active sites. However, it disappearsor reverses itself for substitutions outside the active sites.Two possibilities can be raised to explain this finding: (1)that global stability of a protein against unfolding mightnot be relevant for its global dynamics in the native stateand (2) that global dynamics might not determine functionality, as was indeed argued in [51]. To illustrate thesearguments, the following analogy with building a housemight be offered. In order for a house to be livable, it musthave windows. Windows certainly diminish structuralintegrity of the building (decreased ‘stability’). However,that does not mean that a building must be structurallyshaky to be livable. What it does imply, though, is thatother parts of the building must be reinforced to allow forwindows to be carved in the walls without the buildingfalling apart completely — the analogy with the needto make stabilizing mutations elsewhere in the proteinCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology 2017, 42:31–40to evolve functional variants [49,52]. A strong evidencethat overall stabilization of proteins does not come at adetriment to its function comes from long term evolutionary experiments with E. coli [53]. Most lines that evolvedat 20 8C lost fitness relative to the ancestor when theycompeted at 40 8C and above [88], whereas most lines thatevolved at 41.5 8C did not lose fitness at 20 8C and below[54].The prevalence of epistasis, and its impact on evolution isstill debated. Some describe it as rampant [38 ] andpervasive [55], or even consider it a determining factorof the molecular evolution [22,56], whereas others view itas less important [57,58]. We return to the discussion ofprevalence and mechanisms of epistasis later, after introducing the theoretical foundation of protein biophysicspopulation genetics mapping.From protein biophysics to organismal fitnessAlthough insightful and informative, evolutionary studiesthat focus entirely on the protein sequence space landscapes have one major disadvantage — being purelyphenomenological, they are oblivious to the biophysicalmechanisms of the molecular and systems scales thatdetermine fitness effects of mutations [59]. Indeed, biological networks are responsible for the striking capacityof organisms, on one hand, to limit the enormous fitnesscost of the mutational load [60,61], and, on the other hand,to harness its evolutionary potential [62]. A major role inmodulating the mutational effects at a systems scale isplayed by protein quality control (PQC). In general,molecular chaperones constituting the PQC can serveas a buffer against the deleterious effects of mutations,thus they are less likely to be purged by purifying selection [12,63]. This lead to the view that certain elements ofthe PQC act as ‘capacitors’ of genetic variability thatbroadly reshape the biophysical properties — organismalfitness map [12,64–67] and control the rate of proteinevolution [63,68–72]. Recently, PQC was also identifiedas imposing a global barrier to functional integration ofhorizontally transferred genes in bacteria, because thenewly acquired genes were found to be incompatible withthe elements of PQC of the host [73 ].Rodrigues et al. [4 ] have recently demonstrated that it ispossible to incorporate the pleiotropic effects of mutations originating in the PQC interaction with the mutantproteins into a model that correctly predicts organismalfitness entirely from the biophysical characteristics. Themodel is based on the relationship between fitness andmetabolic flux [74,75]:fitness flux ¼a E;BþE(1)where E is the functional capacity of a protein in theenzymatic chain, a denotes maximal fitness at the highestflux, and B is the constant related to the effect of all

From sequences to fitness Bershtein, Serohijos and Shakhnovich 35PQC [12]. Rodrigues et al. [4 ] showed that this latterquantity can be accurately predicted from the in vitromeasurements of the population of the molten-globulelike state of the mutant proteins, in agreement withtheoretical predictions from the dynamic turnover model[12]. Using the model, Rodrigues et al. [4 ] success

Enzyme Efficiency, k cat /K m 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Product turnover 0102 4 6 8 cytoplasmic abundance 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Functional capacity 1 Fitness Probability of fixation: s fitness mutant fitness wildtype fitness wildtype Fitness effect of a mutation: P fix 1 exp(–2s) 1 (a) (

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .

Each level of Girl Scouting has its own unique bridging award patch. Bridging Ceremonies Bridging ceremonies often utilize a bridge as girls take literal steps toward the future. For Girl Scouts, the act of crossing the bridge is both a physical and symbolic step. Bridging ceremonies can: Include troops, groups, or individuals

But what are the best scales on this chromatic? - 10-note scales have only 1 semitone, not enough for musical interest. - 12-note scales have 5 semitones, but this makes scale notes very closely spaced. - 11-note scales have 3 semitones, which seems a good compromise (1 more semitone than classical scales). Scales on 19-note chromatic 59

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

MARCH 1973/FIFTY CENTS o 1 u ar CC,, tonics INCLUDING Electronics World UNDERSTANDING NEW FM TUNER SPECS CRYSTALS FOR CB BUILD: 1;: .Á Low Cóst Digital Clock ','Thé Light.Probé *Stage Lighting for thé Amateur s. Po ROCK\ MUSIC AND NOISE POLLUTION HOW WE HEAR THE WAY WE DO TEST REPORTS: - Dynacó FM -51 . ti Whárfedale W60E Speaker System' .

Glossary of Social Security Terms (Vietnamese) Term. Thuật ngữ. Giải thích. Application for a Social Security Card. Đơn xin cấp Thẻ Social Security. Mẫu đơn quý vị cần điền để xin số Social Security hoặc thẻ thay thế. Baptismal Certificate. Giấy chứng nhận rửa tội

More than words-extreme You send me flying -amy winehouse Weather with you -crowded house Moving on and getting over- john mayer Something got me started . Uptown funk-bruno mars Here comes thé sun-the beatles The long And winding road .

Phần II: Văn học phục hưng- Văn học Tây Âu thế kỷ 14- 15-16 Chương I: Khái quát Thời đại phục hưng và phong trào văn hoá phục hưng Trong hai thế kỉ XV và XVI, châu Âu dấy lên cuộc vận động tư tưởng và văn hoá mới rấ

7 ESSENTIAL JAZZ GUITAR SCALES FOR BEGINNERS earning jazz guitar scales can be complicated and often beginners wonder which scales they should learn first. The 7 scales on the chart below are a good place to start. These scales are essential for beginning jazz guitarists and enable you to play over almost any jazz standard.

Piano Scale Books Hirschberg Scales and Chords Are Fun: Bk. 1 (Major), Bk. 2 (Minor). Schaum, Scales and Pieces in All Keys: Bk. 1, Bk. 2. Palmer, Manus, Lethco: Scales, Chords-1st Book Palmer, Manus, Lethco: Complete Book of Scales Ada Richter: Know Your Scales and Arpeggios The Brown Scale Book Franz Schulz: Scales and Chords in all Keys

between plies of dissimilar orientation, so fiber-bridging does not occur. Therefore, in order to be useful in structural modeling, expressions relating the delamination growth rate and strain energy release rate must account for the effect of fiber-bridging. Fiber-bridging under quasi-static loading can be quantified as a delamination .

The Pentatonic Scale on Piano 10 The Pentatonic Scale and the CAGED System for Guitar 11 Hearing Pentatonic Scales 12 Beyond the Major Pentatonic 13 . seventh chords, minor or major scales, church modes, and more. Soloing with the pentatonic scale over chord progressions is very comm

Bass Fundamentals Column #14 – Putting Scales To Work As you know, scales are simply a sequence of notes played one at a time. And one of the first scales you learn is the Major scale, shown below in the key of G over two octaves. And you should know that scales ar

These pay scales come into effect from 1.1.2006. 9. Pay Scales and Pay Fixation Formula: a. The Pay Scales prescribed for UGC Revised Pay Scales 2006 as per Fitment Tables annexed shall be implemented. b. The pay of all eligible university and college teachers in the UGC Scales of Pay as on 1.1.2006 shall be fixed at the corresponding pay inFile Size: 421KB

Keyboard: Learn to play A, E, and scales using the “Scales” worksheet Treble Clef – Construct Scales Bass Clef – Construct Scales Grand Staff – Construct Scales . What are the two names for the note found one whole step above G#? 9. What are the two names for the note found one whole step belo

Reptile scales, bird feathers, and mammal hair are all made from the same substance called keratin (pronounced as kara - tin). A reptile's scales help it to save water and thus live on land. A covering of scales prevents dehydration (dee hi drey shun), or loss of water in dry air. However, scales do not help to keep the reptile's body warm.