Response Of Groundnut To Plant Density And Phosphorous .

2y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
431.38 KB
12 Pages
Last View : 4d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Roy Essex
Transcription

Int. J. Biosci.2016International Journal of Biosciences IJB ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print), 2222-5234 (Online)http://www.innspub.netVol. 9, No. 1, p. 291-302, 2016RESEARCH PAPEROPEN ACCESSResponse of Groundnut to Plant Density and PhosphorousApplication in the Sudan Savanna Zone of NigeriaHakeem A. Ajeigbe1*, Alpha Y. Kamara2, Ayuba Kunihya1, Abubakar H. Inuwa1, AliyuAdinoyi1International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT),1Kano Station, NigeriaInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria2Key words: Fertilizer, Groundnut, Plant density, Sudan Savanna, 02Article published on July 30, 2016AbstractDespite the recent release of several improved varieties of groundnut in Nigeria the productivities have notincrease significantly due to lack of commensurate recommendation in agronomic practices. Two groundnutvarieties were evaluated for their response to different plant density and phosphorus application in two locationsin the Sudan Savanna zone of Nigeria in 2012 and 2013. The groundnut were planted at density of 44444, 66667,and 133333 hills ha-1 with average of two plants per hill. Phosphorus was applied at rate of 0 or 20 kg P ha -1. Pfertilizer application increased pod and haulm yields by 26% and 16% respectively in Minjibir. It increased podand haulm yields by 62% and 27% respectively in Wudil. Pod and haulm yields, harvest index, revenue, profitand cost benefit ratio increased with increasing plant density. Samnut-24 produced pod yields that weresignificantly higher than Samnut-22 across treatments. Pod yields at density of 133,333 hills ha-1 was 31% higherthan at 66667 and 40% than at 44,444 hills ha-1. Application of fertilizer increased profit by 22% and 49% inMinjibir and Wudil respectively. Planting at density of 133,333 hill ha-1 increased profit by 19% and 27% over66,667 and 444444 hill ha-1 respectively in Minjibir, while it increase profit by 9% in Wudil. Cultivation ofSamnut-24 at high density with phosphorus application will make groundnut production a more profitableventure in Sudan Savanna zone of Nigeria.* CorrespondingAuthor: Hakeem A. Ajeigbe h.ajeigbe@cgiar.org291 Ajeigbe et al.

Int. J. Biosci.2016Introductionsemiarid and sub-humid Savannas, is often limited byGroundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is a leguminousbiophysical constraints, including poor soil fertilitycrop of economic importance around the world, with(Manu et al., 1991; Giller et al., 2011;). Groundnut is aabout 94% of the world production coming from theleguminous plant and it can fix its own nitrogen fromrain-fed crop grown largely by resource-poor farmersthe atmosphere, however, it needs other macro and(Dwivedi et al., 2002). Nigeria is the largestmicronutrient in the soil. Phosphorus deficiency is thegroundnutAfricamost frequent nutrient stress for growth andaccounting for 40% production of the region. InproducingcountryinWestdevelopment of grain legumes including groundnutNorthern Nigeria, Groundnut contributes 23% of(Kwari 2005; Kamara et al., 2008; Kamara et al.,household cash revenue (Ndjeunga et al., 2010) and2011). Phosphorus is essential for many processeswas grown on 2.4 million hectares in 2012 producingthat occur in the growing plants such as biological3.07 million tons with an average pod yield of 1.268nitrogen fixation, photosynthesis, respiration, energytons/ha (FAOSTAT, 2015).storage and cell division. Sharma and Yadov (1997)reported that phosphorus plays a beneficial role inThe average yields of groundnut in Nigeria and mostlegumegrowthandpromotesextensiverootparts of West Africa are lower (903 kg ha-1) thandevelopment and thereby ensuring good yield.those in South Africa (2000 kg ha-1), Asia (1798 kgKamara et al. (2011b), reported response of soybeanha-1), or the rest of the world (1447 kg ha-1)to P fertilizer in the savannas of northern Nigeria,(FAOSTAT, 2015). The main constraints limitingwhile Kamara et al. (2011a) reported linear increasegroundnut production in the Nigerian savannas arein pod yields of groundnut with increase in P ratesdiseases (early and late leaf spot and rosette),from 0 to 40 kgP/ha. Addition of phosphorusdrought, low soil fertility and poor agronomicfertilizer enhances root development which improvespractices (Ndjeunga and Ajeigbe, 2012). Naab et al.the supply of other nutrients and water to the growing(2005) noted that the lower yields in West Africa areparts of the plants, resulting in an increasedlargely due to leaf spot disease as well as low soilphotosynthetic area and therefore, more dry matterfertility and water limitation (drought). Drought is anaccumulation (Maity et al., 2003; Atayese, 2007).important constraint in the dry savannas and it cancome early, mid or late season drought. While earlyFarmers in Nigeria and many other West Africamaturing varieties may escape early or end of seasoncountries plant grain crops in rows spaced 75 cmdrought, varieties with drought resistant or tolerancebecause most tractor and animal drawn ridgersare required to produce economic yields when mid-available are fixed at width of 75 cm leaving theseason drought occurs.farmers with no option in reducing row spacing. Thislong established practice has been in line with theRecently released varieties (Samnut 24, Samnut 25,recommended groundnut spacing (75 cm x 20cm)and Samnut 26) in Nigeria (NACGRAB 2014,) arecorresponding to plant density of 66,667/ha usingresistant/tolerant to most of the important diseasesabout 50 to 60 kg of seed (Ousmane and Ajeigbe,and are early maturing to escape drought. These2009). This density though higher than the initialvarieties are being promoted in the dry savannas ofrecommendation of 44,000/ha (NAERLS, 1977), itNigeria through several initiatives (Monyo andmay not be optimal for maximising groundnut yield.Gowda, 2014). However poor agronomic practices,In India for example, between row spacing variesespecially the practice of wide spacing and limited orfrom 20 - 100 cm and within row spacing from 7.5 cmlack of fertilizer application particularly phosphorusto 15 cm (Nigam et al., 2006) ensuring hill density oflimits on-farm yield (Ajeigbe and Singh, 2006) and100 to over 200,000 hill/ha. Kamara et al. (2014)profitabilityCropreported soybean yield increased by 62-100% whenproduction in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in thedensity increased from 266,666 to 666,700 ha-1 in theofgroundnut292 Ajeigbe et al.production.

Int. J. Biosci.Guineasavanna2016ofNigeria. Theynotedthatdays of 43 and 38 in 2012 and 2013 respectively.appropriate plant density enhances productivitythrough efficient use of soil moisture and nutrient asCultural practiceswell as adequate photosynthetic light capture. NigamThe fields were harrowed and ridged at 75cm betweenet al. (2006) suggested that optimum plant standridges using tractor drawn implements before plotremains the key to higher yields in groundnut. Mostlayout and sowing. Groundnut seeds were sown at theof the newly released groundnut varieties are erectrate of 2 seeds per hole at depth of 3-5 cm. Weedstypes of early duration with much smaller foliagewere controlled manually using hand hoe at 3, 6 andcompared to the older varieties which are spreading9 weeks after sowing stics of most of the modern varieties haveExperimental design and treatmentschanged, the recommended seeding rate of 50-60 kgThe experimental design was a split-split-plot with 4seed ha-1 and planting densities have remainedreplications. The groundnut varieties; SAMNUT 22 (aunchanged. Combining adaptedearly maturingmedium maturing Virginia type variety released ingroundnut varieties with phosphorous application2001) and SAMNUT 24 (an early maturing Spanishand optimal plant density may increase groundnuttype variety released in 2011) were the main plots.productivity and make groundnut cultivation a moreThe fertilizer application; 20 kg P ha-1 applied atprofitable enterprise for smallholder farmers. On thissowing and a control with no fertilizer were the sub-basis, field trials were established in two locations inplots.the Sudan Savanna ecology of Nigeria to evaluate theresponse of two contrasting groundnut varieties to PThe 20 kgP ha-1 was applied as SSP by drawing aapplication and increased plant density.furrow on the ridge. The required SSP was spreadevenly in the furrow and covered with soil. One blankMaterials and methodsrow was left in between the sub-plots. The sub-sub-Experimental siteplots were the density treatments of 44,444, 66,667The experiments were carried out in 2012 and 2013and 133,333 hills ha-1 obtained using a spacing of 75 xcropping seasons at Wasai (latitude 8.67oE and30, 75 x 20 and 75 x 10cm respectively. The sub-sub-longitudeplots sizes were 12 m2 (4 rows 4 m long).12.15oN),Minjibirlocalauthority (LGA) and Wudil (latitudelongitude11.82oN),government8.78 oEandWudil LGA of Kano State. SoilData collectionsamples were taken from the two locations, air dry inThe two middle rows per plot were used for datathe shade and analysed in the soil analyticalcollection. Data were collected on % soil cover at 3laboratory of ICRISAT Niamey. The results of soiland 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) which was theanalysis for both locations are presented in Table 1.proportion of the plated area covered by theThe soils were slight acidic with very low organicgroundnut at 3 and 6 weeks respectively after sowing.matter, N and P. most of the other nutrients areDays to 50% flowering (number of days from sowinglimiting.to when at least 50% of the plants in the net plot hadat least one flower), days to physiological maturityRainfall (Table 2) in both locations had mono-modal(days to when at least 90% of the plants in the netdistribution which starts in June and end inplots have attained physiological maturity). PlantSeptember with most of the rains falling in July andheight (cm) at maturity (mean height from base toAugust. Rainfall in Minjibir was 994 mm in 2012 andhighest point of five plants), number of branches per1054 mm in 2013 with raining days of 32 and 36 inplant, pod and haulm yields (Pod and haulm weights2012 and 2013 respectively; Wudil had 945.8 mmwere obtained after sun-drying all the plantsrainfall in 2012 and 907.4 mm in 2013 with rainingharvested from the two middle rows per plot to293 Ajeigbe et al.

Int. J. Biosci.2016constant weight and then converted to kg ha-1).(GENSTAT, Statistical software 16th edition). Leastsignificance difference between means was used toEconomic analysiscompare treatments (LSD) using a significance levelPartial budgeting was used to estimate revenue, andof α 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficients weretotal profit per hectare for each groundnut variety atcalculated between the variable and yields.different fertilizer and density treatments using themethod suggested by Ajeigbe and Singh (2006). TheResultsvariable cost consisted of the cost of seed, fertilizerVariety (V), Phosphorus fertilizer application (F) andand fertilizer application. Labour cost for plantingplant density (P) significantly influenced groundnutand harvest were assumed constant across seedingperformance in both locations. Table 3A shows therate. Profit margin was estimated by deducting themean squares from the Analysis of Variance for thecost of the seed, fertilizer and fertilizer applicationmeasured parameters in Minjibir. Year of plantingfrom the income derived from grain and haulmsignificantly affected all the agronomic parametersproduced. Farm gate price were determined each yearexcept pod yield. Phosphorus fertilizer applicationby taking average price across locations two monthssignificantly influenced pod and haulm yields as wellafter harvest.as harvest index (HI). Plant density significantlyaffected pod and haulm yields. Differences betweenStatistical analysisthe two varieties were significant for all parametersThe data were subjected to analysis of varianceexcept for haulm yield.(ANOVA) using the GENSTAT statistical programmeTable 1. Soil analysis for Minjibir and Wudil experimental plots, 2012 and 2013 Cropping 291.74.04.2Organic Carbon (%)N-total (mg/kg)Zn (mg/kg)Available P (mg/kg)pH/H2OExchangeable K (Cmol/kg)Ca2 (Cmol/kg)PbSand (%)Silt (%)Clay 152,,2.95.70.30.8,,92.84.62.5Table 2. Monthly rainfall (mm) in the experimental sites in 2012 and 0021.5156.2293.7424.898000994294 Ajeigbe et 12511991945.843907.438

Int. J. Biosci.2016Year Variety (Y V) interaction was significant foron groundnut variety. V P interaction significantlyplant height at harvest, number of branches per plant,affected pod yield and harvest index. The three wayhaulm yields and harvest index. No significant valueinteractions among V, F and P was not significant forwas observed for Y F interaction. The responses ofmost parameters.number of branches to P fertilization was dependentTable 3. Combined mean squares from the analysis of variance for days to 50% flowering, plant height, numberof branches per plant and pod weight of groundnut 3A. Minjibir, 2012 and 2013.Sourcevariationof d.fReplicationYear (Y)Variety (V)Fertilizer (F)Hill Density sidualTotal3111211122212222699550% floweringPlant(cm)height Numberbranches/plant0.17713.7604*2390.0104**0.0938 ns1.1563 ns23.0104**0.0938 ns0.0104 ns0.6979 ns0.8229 ns0.4063 ns0.2604 ns0.3229 ns1.7813 ns1.0729 ns1.0729 ns0.9959190.97374.82**6491.33**71.99 ns31.99 ns359.56**57.77 ns83.24 ns22.58 ns28.44 ns2.69 ns0.09 ns28.11 ns34.17 ns13.98 ns3.26 ns35.136.13457.196**79.753**0.230 ns1.089 ns155.296**6.050 ns13.425*9.040 ns5.981 ns0.869 ns0.555 ns3.790 ns2.826 ns16.846**3.181 ns3.023of Pod yield (kg/ha)70570219938 ns19846200**1780243**2741981**34694 ns6518 ns8381 ns48348 ns433357**117552 ns85264 ns5462 ns32605 ns149041 ns50641 ns78589Haulm(kg/ha)yield Harvest Index1009554586753**306230 ns1917045**1127381**3393024**61611 ns551 ns185065 ns156101 ns372367 ns169680 ns60857 ns422342 ns341336 ns17170 ns19137615.29975.38**32340.04**630.38**174.59 ns1584.38**40.04 ns0.04 ns88.16 ns299.89*267.97 ns63.37 ns0.28 ns443.57*80.39 ns61.91 ns98.63WAS Weeks after sowing.3B. Wudil, 2012 and 2013.Source of variationd.f50% flowering Plant height (cm) Numberof Pod yield(kg/ha) Haulm yield (kg/ha)Harvest 2250731404.0Year **Variety 926.0**Fertilizer Hill Density V11.260 ns1467.42**9.047*14875 ns4803018**2242.7**Y.F10.094 ns44.65 ns2.242 ns2071231**661178*770.7*V.F11.260 ns0.00 ns6.136*1160061**857871*0.0 nsY.P20.667 ns57.88 ns0.432 ns2681901**2309461**148.0 nsV.P20.125 ns39.01 ns2.683 ns106311 ns16356 ns70.6 nsF.P20.542 ns9.74 ns0.090 ns15009 ns33741 ns61.3 nsY.V.F10.010 ns8.90 ns2.004 ns20621 ns92566 ns42.7 ns20.667 ns5.27 ns0.168 ns240700*100620 ns159.8 ns21.500 ns3.02 ns0.350 ns53423 ns148161 ns392.4 nsV.F.P20.542 ns29.61 ns1.872 ns101458 ns191350 ns46.9 nsY.V.F.P20.667 ns13.68 ns1.746 ns22829 ns292683 ns72.4 5Y.V.PY.F.PWAS Weeks after sowingTable 3B shows the mean squares from the Analysisagronomic parameters except pod yield. Significantof Variance for the measured parameters in Wudil.differences were observed between the varieties for allYear of planting significantly affected all thethe agronomic parameters. P fertilizer application295 Ajeigbe et al.

Int. J. Biosci.2016significantly influenced plant height, number ofwas significant for number of branches per plant podbranches per plant, pod and haulm yields as well asand haulm yields. Y P interaction was significant forHI. Plant density significantly affected pod yield. Y Vpod and haulm yields. V P and F P interactions wereinteraction was significant for plant height at harvest,not significant for any of the attributes. The three waynumber of branches per plant, haulm yields andinteractions among V, F and P was not significant forharvest index. Y F interaction was significant forany parameter.pod and haulm yields as well as HI. V F interactionTable 4. Effect of fertilizer, groundnut variety and hill density on plant cover, days 50% flowering, plant height,and number of branches of groundnut in Minjibir.MinjibirTreatmentsWudil50% floweringPlant height (cm) Number of branches/plant50% floweringPlant heightBranches per 89.3828.8136.698.27P of F0.0560.002 .001 .0010.055 .001LSD0.4061.4140.7080.4372.4410.507Samnut 2230.4032.939.5231.5430.638.80Samnut 2420.4249.387.7029.6040.366.32P of F .001 .001 .001 .001 .001 0.298.5630.8133.957.8120 kg P/ha25.4442.028.6630.3337.047.30P of 0.8434.397.73P of 914.420.23.516.916.5YearVarietyFertilizerHill densityEffect of fertilizer, groundnut variety and hill densitybranches per groundnut plant in Minjibir and Wudil.on growth parametersThe plants were significantly taller in 2012 than 2013Table 4 shows the effect of year, groundnut varieties,but produced more branches in 2013 than 2012.phosphorus fertilizer application and plant density onSamnut 24 flowered and matured significantly earlierdays to 50% flowering, plant height and number ofthan Samnut 22.Table 5. Interaction effect of variety and Hill density on pod weight (kgha-1) of groundnut at Minjibir and Wudil.Hill 1333336666744444MeanSamnut 22954626647742831745720765Samnut 123954901LSD Variety (V)114.2103.5LSD Density (P)139.8126.7LSD V x P197.7179.2296 Ajeigbe et al.

Int. J. tthanSamnutSamnut2224grewflowering were lower in 2013 than in 2012. Thebuthadnumber of branches per plant were significantlysignificantly less branches per plant than Samnut 22.higher in 2012 than in 2013. Samnut 24 adnotallerthanSamnut22buthadsignificant effect on growth parameters (days to 50%significantly lower number of branches per plant.flowering, plant height and number of branches perApplication of phosphorus fertilizer significantlyplant). Plant density had no significant effect on theincreased plant height.growth parameter. In Wudil, number of days toTable 6. Interaction effect of variety and P fertilizer application on haulm yield (kgha-1) of groundnut at Minjibirand Wudil.MinjibirWudilVariety0 kg P/ha20 kgP/haMean0 kg P/ha20 kgP/haMeanSamnut 22183921261922113112731202Samnut 24173020081869122617961536Mean1785206712031535LSD Variety (V)178.1163.4LSD Fertilizer (F)218.2163.4LSD V x F308.6283.0Effect of variety and Hill density on groundnut yieldplants ha-1 and 25% higher than that at density ofTable 5 shows the interaction of groundnut varieties44444 plants ha-1. In both locations, the earlyand plant density on groundnut pod yields in thematuring variety SAMNUT 24 produced higher podSudan savannah zone of Nigeria. Pod yields generallyyields than SAMNUT 22 at all plant density. Theincreased with increasing plant density for the twomean pod yield of SAMNUT 24 were higher thanvarieties in both locations. In Minjibir mean

Int. J. Biosci. 2016 Introduction Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is a leguminous crop of economic importance around the world, with about 94% of the world production coming from the rain-fed crop grown largely by resource-poor farmers (Dwivedi et al., 2002). Nigeria

Related Documents:

Cooking oil is an important and essential item in the FMCG sector. An average Indian consumes 15 Kg of oil in a year. Compared to other oils like sunflower oil, cottonseed oil, and soy oil, groundnut oil has more nutritional value. In addition to cooking, groundnut oil is used in the bakery and confectionery industry. Groundnut oil is used in .

1. Introduction Groundnut, or peanut, is commonly called the poor man's nut. Today it is an important oilseed and food crop. This plant is native to South America and has never been found uncultivated. The botanical name for groundnut, Arachis hypogaea Linn., is derived from two

The concept of the project is such that the knowledge of designing, mechanism and plucking forces are increased. Some plucking forces are needed to pluck the Groundnut from its plant. This project consists of designing and development of a machine to pluck Groundnut so that the farmer can sell it directly in the market and can achieve more profit.

weed dry weight and recordedhigher weed control efficiency in groundnut.The use of herbicide as a means of weed management is fast gaining momentum especially in groundnut cultivation. Herbicides are efficient in suppressing or modifying weed growth in such a way as to prevent interference with crop establishment (Kunjo, 1981).

7. Climatic Requirements 8. Soil Requirements 9. Land Husbandry and Crop Management 10. Abiotic Stresses 11. Biotic Stresses 12. Aflatoxins in Groundnut 13. Genetic Resources 14. Conclusions Related Chapters Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary The groundnut or peanut is o

Step 3: Applying fertilizer Groundnut can fix nitrogen from the air, and therefore does not need to be fertilized with nitrogen fertilizers such as ammonium nitrate or urea. Groundnut needs other nutrients such as phosphorus and calcium. Good types of phosphorus fertilizer are SSP and Compound L. Compound L has high P content in relation to N.

total production of 37.1 million metric t and an average productivity of 1.4 metric t/ha (FAO, 2003). Over 100 countries worldwide grow groundnut. Developing countries constitute 97% of the global area and 94% of the global production of this crop. The production of groundnut is concentrated in Asia

Accounting records will be maintained in accordance with ORGANIZATION NAME's fiscal year, ie. January 1-December 31. 2. The double-entry method of bookkeeping and the accrual method of accounting shall be used. 3. ORGANIZATION NAME's computer system will be utilized in maintaining and creating the general ledger, all related journals and financial reports. 4. All revenues, support and expenses .